BioOne.org will be down briefly for maintenance on 17 December 2024 between 18:00-22:00 Pacific Time US. We apologize for any inconvenience.
Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
8 December 2016 Development of Highly Variable Microsatellite Markers for the Tetraploid Silene stellata (Caryophyllaceae)
Juannan Zhou, Michele R. Dudash, Charles B. Fenster, Elizabeth A. Zimmer
Author Affiliations +

There are nearly 700 species in the genus Silene L. (Caryophyllaceae). Silene species exhibit diverse pollination specialization as manifested by their floral diversity (Kephart et al., 2006). Approximately one third of all Silene species in the Old and New World exhibit nocturnal pollination syndromes and usually form close interactions with noctuid moths from the genus Hadena (Noctuidae) (Kephart et al., 2006). Silene stellata (L.) W. T. Aiton is an infrequent native perennial herb that is distributed throughout the eastern part of the United States. The flowers are pollinated by Hadena ectypa as well as by a number of generalist nocturnal moths (Reynolds et al., 2009; Kula et al., 2013). In addition to the positive effect of pollination, oviposition by female H. ectypa inside the calyx results in strong negative effects through larval predation on the reproductive tissues of S. stellata (Kula et al., 2013). Depending on the amount of pollination service provided by the generalist moths, the net outcome of the Silene–Hadena interaction can range from mutualism to parasitism (Reynolds et al., 2012), making it a valuable system for understanding the evolutionary dynamics of interspecific interactions (Kephart et al., 2006; Bernasconi et al., 2009).

Ecological and evolutionary studies utilizing genetic markers of North American Silene species are relatively few compared with the European species (Moyle, 2006), potentially due to technical complications caused by the prevalent polyploidy: most North American Silene species have been shown to be polyploids, including tetra-, hexa-, and octoploids, with tetraploidy being the most common ploidy level (Popp and Oxelman, 2007). Prior to this study, we tested nine microsatellite markers developed for S. latifolia Poir. (Magalhaes et al., 2011) in 20 individuals of S. stellata and did not identify any polymorphic loci. We report the development of 18 highly variable microsatellite markers for the tetraploid S. stellata. These markers are being used to quantify the population genetic structure of S. stellata. We will also use these markers to assess individual siring abilities through paternity assignment to investigate selection on floral design through the male function of the hermaphroditic S. stellata. We also tested transferability of these markers to two closely related tetraploid Silene species: the specialist hummingbird-pollinated S. virginica L. and the primarily Bombus- and hawk moth–pollinated S. caroliniana Walter (Reynolds et al., 2009).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Genomic DNA was extracted from fresh leaf tissue of a S. stellata individual collected from a natural population near Mountain Lake Biological Station in Giles County, Virginia, USA (37.348296°N, 80.544301 °W, elevation ca. 1100– 1300 m; Appendix 1), using the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, California, USA) following the manufacturer's protocol. DNA libraries were prepared using the KAPA Library Preparation Kit version 2.13 (KR0453; Kapa Biosystems, Wilmington, Massachusetts, USA) following the manufacturer's protocol. Libraries were quantified with a Qubit Fluorometric Quantitation instrument (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, California, USA) and then sequenced using an Illumina MiSeq version 3 kit (Illumina, San Diego, California, USA) to produce paired-end reads of ≤301 bases. A total of 8,557,438 reads were imported and paired by name in Geneious 7.0.6 (Biomatters, Auckland, New Zealand). A de novo assembly was performed on the first 1,000,000 sequences for which both reads of any pair were ≥200 bases.

Table 1.

Characteristics of 18 microsatellite loci developed in Silene stellata.a

t01_01.gif

A total of 99,506 consensus sequences between 200 and 400 bp were extracted and screened for potential microsatellite loci using MSATCOMMANDER 1.0.8 beta (Faircloth, 2008) with default settings. Primers were designed for sequences with perfect di-, tri-, and tetranucleotide repeats in Primer3 software (Rozen and Skaletsky, 1999). We designed primers for 153 out of a total of 946 loci identified as containing microsatellites. One hundred fourteen primer pairs were first tested with seven randomly selected S. stellata samples for amplification success and polymorphism. For each primer pair, we modified the forward primer by attaching a CAG tag (5′-CAGTCGGGCGTCATCA-3′) preceding the 5′ end to enable the cost-efficient fluorescent labeling system of PCR products described by Boutin-Ganache et al. (2001) and Glenn (2001). Ten microliter PCR reactions were performed using the QIAGEN Type-it Microsatellite PCR Kit. Each reaction contained the following components : ∼10 ng of genomic DNA, 5 µL of the 2× Multiplex PCR Master Mix, 0.02 µM of the modified forward primer, 0.2 µM of reverse primer, and 0.2 µM of the fluorescently labeled CATG primer (5′-6FAM, 5′-HEX). A touchdown PCR protocol was used to test all primer pairs: 5 min of denaturing at 95°C; five cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 60°C for 1.5 min, and 72°C for 30 s; followed by 28 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 55°C for 1.5 min, and 72°C for 30 s; and a final extension at 60°C for 30 min.

Of the 114 primer pairs tested, 50 produced bands consistently on an agarose gel. Amplicons of these primers were analyzed using an ABI Prism 3730 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA), then visualized and scored in Geneious 7.0.6 (Biomatters). Eighteen loci showed clear peak patterns and were polymorphic (Table 1). These 18 polymorphic loci were further characterized using a total of 95 S. stellata individuals collected from three local populations near Mountain Lake Biological Station (Meadow, Woodland, and Windrock) within 8 km of one another. To investigate marker transferability, these 18 loci were also tested on six individuals from one population each of S. virginica from Newport, Virginia, and S. caroliniana from Potomac, Maryland (Appendix 1).

We report the following parameters for the three populations of S. stellata: sample size, number of alleles, number of private alleles, observed heterozygosity, and expected heterozygosity. The parameters were estimated using GenoDive version 2.0b27 (Meirmans and Van Tienderen, 2004) while correcting for unknown dosage of alleles for partial heterozygotes. Across the three populations, the number of alleles ranged from six to 45, and expected heterozygosity ranged from 0.511 to 0.951 (Table 2).

Of the 18 loci tested in S. virginica and S. caroliniana, 10 loci were successfully amplified in both species. Genotyping results showed two loci were monomorphic in both species, one locus was polymorphic in S. virginica but monomorphic in S. caroliniana, five loci were polymorphic in both species, and two loci showed multiple bands (Table 3). Vouchers for the Silene species were deposited at the Norton-Brown Herbarium (University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA; Appendix 1).

CONCLUSIONS

We developed 18 novel microsatellite loci for S. stellata. These loci showed high variability in S. stellata and therefore are suitable for future paternity analysis. Five of these markers are polymorphic in the related S. virginica and S. caroliniana. These microsatellites will also be useful for studying the population genetics of S. stellata and related North American species in this genus.

Table 2.

Genetic diversity of the 18 polymorphic microsatellites of Silene stellata.a

t02_01.gif

Table 3.

Genetic diversity of six microsatellite loci developed in Silene stellata in two related native Silene species.a

t03_01.gif

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank G. Bernasconi, D. Taylor, and their laboratory groups for initial help in microsatellite marker development, and T. Glenn and his laboratory group for help in next-generation sequencing and primer design of Silene stellata.

LITERATURE CITED

1.

Bernasconi, G., J. Antonovics, A. Biere, D. Charlesworth, L. F. Delph, D. Filatov, T. Giraud, et al. 2009. Silene as a model system in ecology and evolution. Heredity 103: 5–14. Google Scholar

2.

Boutin-Ganache, I., M. Raposo, M. Raymond, and C. F. Deschepper. 2001. M13-tailed primers improve the readability and usability of microsatellite analyses performed with two different allele-sizing methods. BioTechniques 31: 24–28. Google Scholar

3.

Faircloth, B. C. 2008. MSATCOMMANDER: Detection of microsatellite repeat arrays and automated, locus-specific primer design. Molecular Ecology Resources 8: 92–94. Google Scholar

4.

Glenn, T. C. 2001. 5′ tags: A cheap way to fluorescently tag PCR products. Website  http://dna.uga.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2013/12/5-Primer-Tags-PCR-products.pdf [accessed 21 November 2016]. Google Scholar

5.

Kephart, S., R. J. Reynolds, M. T. Rutter, C. B. Fenster, and M. R. Dudash. 2006. Pollination and seed predation by moths on Silene and allied Caryophyllaceae: Evaluating a model system to study the evolution of mutualisms. New Phytologist 169: 667–680. Google Scholar

6.

Kula, A. A. R., M. R. Dudash, and C. B. Fenster. 2013. Choices and consequences of oviposition by a pollinating seed predator. Hadena ectypa (Noctuidae), on its host plant. Silene stellata (Caryophyllaceae). American Journal of Botany 100: 1148–1154. Google Scholar

7.

Magalhaes, I. S., G. Gleiser, A.-M. Labouche, and G. Bernasconi. 2011. Comparative population genetic structure in a plant–pollinator/seed predator system. Molecular Ecology 20: 4618–4630. Google Scholar

8.

Meirmans, P. G., and P. H. Van Tienderen. 2004. GENOTYPE and GENODIVE: Two programs for the analysis of genetic diversity of asexual organisms. Molecular Ecology Notes 4: 792–794. Google Scholar

9.

Moyle, L. C. 2006. Correlates of genetic differentiation and isolation by distance in 17 congeneric Silene species. Molecular Ecology 15: 1067–1081. Google Scholar

10.

Popp, M., and B. Oxelman. 2007. Origin and evolution of North American polyploid Silene (Caryophyllaceae). American Journal of Botany 94: 330–349. Google Scholar

11.

Reynolds, R. J., M. J. Westbrook, A. S. Rohde, J. M. Cridland, C. B. Fenster, and M. R. Dudash. 2009. Pollinator specialization and pollination syndromes of three related North American Silene. Ecology 90: 2077–2087. Google Scholar

12.

Reynolds, R. J., A. A. R. Kula, C. B. Fenster, and M. R. Dudash. 2012. Variable nursery pollinator importance and its effect on plant reproductive success. Oecologia 168: 439–448. Google Scholar

13.

Rozen, S., and H. Skaletsky. 1999. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. In S. Misener and S. A. Krawetz [eds.], Methods in molecular biology, vol. 132: Bioinformatics: Methods and protocols. 365–386. Humana Press, Totowa, New Jersey, USA. Google Scholar

Appendix 1.

Geographic location and voucher information of Silene populations used in this study.

tA01_01.gif
Juannan Zhou, Michele R. Dudash, Charles B. Fenster, and Elizabeth A. Zimmer "Development of Highly Variable Microsatellite Markers for the Tetraploid Silene stellata (Caryophyllaceae)," Applications in Plant Sciences 4(12), (8 December 2016). https://doi.org/10.3732/apps.1600117
Received: 19 September 2016; Accepted: 1 October 2016; Published: 8 December 2016
KEYWORDS
Caryophyllaceae
microsatellites
plant–animal interaction
polyploidy
Silene stellata
Back to Top