In order to establish a unified construction land market, it is necessary to choose a rational pathway for the market transfer of Rural Collective Construction Land (RCCL) in China. This paper focuses on different methods of RCCL transfer based on stakeholder analysis and three case studies including models from Guangdong, Wuhu and Chongqing. The main finding is that all three models improved resource allocation efficiency and intensive utilization of RCCL through land and capital transfer. Each model built different interest coordination mechanisms among stakeholders, suited to different regions and cases. The Guangdong model is suitable for an economically developed region. The Wuhu model is suitable for developing regions in central China while western underdeveloped regions in China can adopt the Chongqing model. The policy implication is that better policy making for the promotion of RCCL transfer in China should consider regional characteristics as well as the economic development context.
How to translate text using browser tools
1 May 2015
Rural Collective Construction Land Transfer Based on Stakeholder Analysis
Shi Minjun,
Wang Hongjuan,
Xie Junqi,
Shang Zhiyuan,
Zhou Dingyang
ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE
Journal of Resources and Ecology
Vol. 6 • No. 3
May 2015
Vol. 6 • No. 3
May 2015
Coordination of Stakeholder Interest
Market Transfer
Path Choice
Rural Collective Construction Land