Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 July 2017 Middle Permian (Wordian) Mixed Boreal—Tethyan Brachiopod Fauna from Matsukawa, South Kitakami Belt, Japan
Jun-Ichi Tazawa, Hideo Araki
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

A middle Permian (Wordian) brachiopod fauna, consisting of 19 species in 18 genera, is described from the lower part of the Kamiyasse Formation in Matsukawa, South Kitakami Belt, northeastern Japan. The Matsukawa fauna is a mixed Boreal—Tethyan brachiopod fauna that shows strong affinities with the middle Permian (Wordian—Capitanian) brachiopod faunas of central Japan (Hida Gaien Belt), eastern Russia (South Primorye), northeastern China (Heilongjiang), northern China (Inner Mongolia) and northwestern China (Xinjiang). The palaeobiogeographical data suggest that Proto-Japan, including South Kitakami, was part of a continental shelf along the northern and eastern margins of North China, located in the mid-latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere during the middle Permian (Wordian).

Introduction

Matsukawa, located in Kesennuma City, Miyagi Prefecture, South Kitakami Belt, northeastern Japan (Figure 1), is a classic locality for Permian marine invertebrate fossils. In the first study of the locality, Wakimizu (1892) reported on occurrences of fossil corals, bryozoans, brachiopods and crinoids. Then, in the first study on the Palaeozoic brachiopods in Japan, Yabe (1900) described the brachiopod species Lyttonia sp. (= Leptodus nobilis) from Matsukawa. Later, 16 Permian brachiopod species were described by Hayasaka (1917, 1922a, 1925, 1963), Tazawa (1979, 1999b) and Tazawa and Araki (1984a, 1984b, 1999, 2013). However, systematic and palaeobiogeographic studies on the brachiopods of the Matsukawa fauna remain insufficient and incomplete.

During the past three decades, middle Permian mixed brachiopod faunas containing both Boreal and Tethyan elements have been recognized in Japan (South Kitakami and Hida Gaien belts), eastern Russia (South Primorye), northeastern China (Jilin and Heilongjiang), northern China (Inner Mongolia) and northwestern China (Xinjiang) (Tazawa, 1987, 1991, 1998, 2001a, 2003, 2007; Nakamura and Tazawa, 1990; Shi et al., 1995, 2002; Shi and Zhan, 1996; Shi and Tazawa, 2001; Shi, 2006; Tazawa and Chen, 2006; Kotlyar et al., 2007; Shen et al., 2009). Palaeobiogeographically, the regions cited above are included in a province (transitional zone) between the Boreal and Tethyan realms, located in the region of North China (Sino-Korea) in the Northern Hemisphere; i.e., the Sino-Mongolian-Japanese Province of Shi and Tazawa (2001) [= the Inner Mongolian-Japanese Transition Zone of Tazawa (1991), or the Northern Transitional Zone of Shi et al. (1995)]. The Permian brachiopod fauna of Matsukawa has also been assigned to the SinoMongolian-Japanese Province based on the presence of both Boreal (Costatumulus, Yakovlevia and Alispiriferella) and Tethyan (Neorichthofenia, Leptodus and Paralyttonia) genera (Yabe, 1900; Tazawa, 1979, 2003; Tazawa and Araki, 1984a, 1984b).

The present paper describes brachiopod species from the middle Permian of Matsukawa, and discusses the age and palaeobiogeography of the fauna, based on the collections of K. Nakamura, H. Koizumi and the present authors, which were collected during the period of 1960–2000s. The fossils described herein are registered and housed in the Department of Geology, Niigata University, Niigata (NU-B prefix); the Tohoku University Museum, Sendai (IGPS prefix); the Hokkaido University Museum, Sapporo (UHR prefix); and the Kesennuma Board of Education (tentatively placed in the Old Tsukitate Junior High School) in Kesennuma (KCG prefix).

Figure 1.

Map showing the Matsukawa area, enclosed by solid line, and fossil localities AR4, AR5 and KZ9 (using the topographic map of GSI).

f01_265.jpg

Stratigraphy

The stratigraphy of the Permian rocks in the Matsukawa area has been studied by Shiida (1940), Kambe and Shimazu (1961) and Tazawa (1975, 1976). According to Tazawa (1975, 1976) and unpublished data by the present author (J. Tazawa), the Permian of the Matsukawa area is represented by the lower part of the Kamiyasse Formation, which consists mainly of sandstone and shale with thin argillaceous limestone layers; the formation has a total thickness of 215 m (Figure 2), is distributed over an area of approximately 300 m (E–W) × 850 m (N–S), and exhibits a NE—SW strike and a dip of 50°–70° to the WNW. The fusulinid Monodiexodina sp., probably Monodiexodina sutchanica (Dutkevich), commonly occurs in sandstone and argillaceous limestone beds in the Matsukawa area. Brachiopods were collected from three localities, AR4 (Anabuchi), AR5 (Kiritoshi) and KZ9 (Omotematsukawa). The topographic and stratigraphic locations, and fossil contents of the fossil localities are as follows:

AR4 (Anabuchi): Cliff along the Matsukawa River (38°55′12″N, 141°32′32″E) exposing dark grey argillaceous limestone of the lower part of the Kamiyasse Formation, and containing the fusulinid species Monodiexodina sp. and ten brachiopod species (Hexiproductus echidniformis, Urushtenoidea crenulata, Permundaria tenuistriata, Yakovlevia mammata, Neorichthofenia mabutii, Leptodus nobilis, Paralyttonia kesennumensis, Martinia sp., Alispiriferella lita and Licharewina arakii).

AR5 (Kiritoshi): Road cutting (38°54′55″N, 141°32′33″E) exposing greenish grey fine-grained sandstone of the lower part of the Kamiyasse Formation, and containing six brachiopod species [Capillomesolobus heritschi, Dyoros (Dyoros) sp., Linoproductus hayasakai, Costatumulus cancriniformis, Yakovlevia kaluzinensis and Alispiriferella lita].

KZ9 (Omotematsukawa): Sandstone quarry (38°55′09″N, 141°32′39″E) exposing greenish grey fine-grained sandstone of the lower part of the Kamiyasse Formation, and containing five brachiopod species (Transennatia gratiosa, Hexiproductus echidnigormis, Urushtenoidea crenuata, Scacchinella gigantea and Keyserlingina sp).

Matsukawa fauna

The brachiopod fauna described herein includes the following 19 species in 18 genera: Capillomesolobus heritschi Pečar, 1986, Dyoros (Dyoros) sp., Transennatia gratiosa (Waagen, 1884). Hexiproduclus echidniformis (Chao, 1925), Urushtenoidea cremdata (Ding in Yang et al., 1962), Scacchinella gigantea Schellwien, 1900, Linoproductus hayasakai Tazawa, 1979, Costatumulus cancriniformis (Tschemyschew, 1889), Permnndaria tenuistriata Tazawa, 1974, Yakovlevia mammata (Keyserling, 1846), Yakovlevia kaluzinensis Fredericks, 1925, Neorichthofenia mabutii (Tazawa and Araki, 1984b), Leptodus nobilis (Waagen, 1883), Keyserlingina sp., Paralyttonia kesennumensis Tazawa and Araki, 1984a, Martinia sp., Alispiriferella lita (Fredericks, 1924), Licharewina arakii (Hayasaka, 1963) and Dielasma sp.

Figure 2.

Generalized columnar section of the lower part of the Kamiyasse Formation in the Matsukawa area, showing the fossil horizons of Monodiexodina and localities AR4, AR5 and KZ9.

f02_265.jpg

Figure 3.

Stratigraphic distribution of brachiopod species of the Matsukawa fauna, excluding the four uncertain species [Dyoros (Dyoros) sp., Keyserlingina sp., Martinia sp. and Dielasma sp].

f03_265.jpg

Age

The stratigraphic distribution of the brachiopod species of the Matsukawa fauna, excluding the four uncertain species, Dyoros (Dyoros) sp., Keyserlingina sp., Martinia sp. and Dielasma sp., are summarized in Figure 3.

Of the brachiopods listed above, Capillomesolobus heritschi is known from the Sakinarian—Wordian, and Hexiproductus echidniformis and Costatumulus cancriniformis are known from the Asselian—Wordian. In contrast, Transennatia gratiosa, Neorichthofenia mabutii, and Alispiriferella lita are known from the Wordian—Changhsingian. Linoproductus hayasakai, Permnndaria tenuistriata, Paralyttonia kesennumensis and Licharewina arakii are restricted to the Wordian. The other species, Urushtenoidea cremdata and Yakovlevia kaluzinensis are known from the Kungurian—Wuchiapingian, Leptodus nobilis is known from the Kungurian—Changhsingian, and Scacchinella gigantea and Yakovlevia mammata are long-ranging species known from the Kasimovian—Capitanian. In summary, the age of the Matsukawa fauna is assigned to the Wordian. This conclusion is supported by the occurrence of the Wordian—Capitanian fusulinid Monodiexodina [probably M. sutchanica (Dutkevich)] in three horizons in the lower Kamiyasse Formation of Matsukawa (see Figure 2).

Figure 4.

Geographic distribution of brachiopod species of the Matsukawa fauna, excluding the four uncertain species [Dyoros (Dyoros) sp., Keyserlingina sp., Martinia sp. and Dielasma sp].

f04_265.jpg

Figure 5.

Middle Permian (Wordian) reconstruction map of the world (adapted from Scotese, 2004), showing the geographic distribution of brachiopod species of the Matsukawa fauna excluding the four uncertain species [Dyoros (Dyoros) sp., Keyserlingina sp., Martinia sp. and Dielasma sp]. Location numbers are same in Figure 4, and the numbers appended to the circles in the legend indicate the species numbers. M: Mongolia, NC: North China, SC: South China, I: Boreal Realm, II: Tethyan Realm, III: Panthalassan Realm, IV: Gondwanan Realm.

f05_265.jpg

Palaeobiogeography

The geographic distribution of the brachiopod species of the Matsukawa fauna, excluding the four uncertain species, Dyoros (Dyoros) sp., Keyserlingina sp., Martinia sp. and Dielasma sp., are summarized in Figures 4 and 5.

The Matsukawa fauna includes the Boreal (antitropical) elements Dyoros (Dyoros) sp., Costatumulus cancriniformis, Yakovlevia mammata, Y. kahizinensis and Alispiriferella lita, and also the Tethyan (tropical) elements Transennatia gratiosa, Hexiproductus echidniformis, Urushtenoidea crenulata, Permundaria tenuistriata, Neorichthofenia mabutii, Leptodus nobilis, Keyserlingina sp., Paralyttonia kesennumensis and Licharewina arakii. Consequently, the fauna is a mixed Boreal-Tethyan fauna, with the Tethyan elements predominating.

Notably, mixed Boreal-Tethyan faunas are also known from southwestern Japan (Maizuru and Akiyoshi belts and Mizukoshi, which is the southwestern extension of the Hida Gaien Belt), central Japan (Hida Gaien Belt and Hitachi, which is the southern extension of the South Kitakami Belt), eastern Russia (South Primorye), northeastern China (Heilongjiang), northern China (Inner Mongolia) and northwestern China (Xinjiang). In tenus of its specific composition, the Matsukawa fauna most closely resembles the middle Permian brachiopod fauna of South Primorye, eastern Russia, as the following six species are common to both faunas: Transennatia gratiosa, Costatumulus cancriniformis, Yakovlevia mammata, Y. kaluzinensis, Leptodus nobilis and Alispiriferella lita. On the other hand, the middle Permian brachiopod faunas of South China (Yangtze) are clearly distinguished from the Matsukawa fauna by the absence of Boreal elements.

The palaeobiogeographical data suggest that Proto-Japan, including South Kitakami, was part of a continental shelf along the northern and eastern margins of North China, located in mid-latitude regions of the Northern Hemisphere during the middle Permian (Wordian), as stated by Tazawa (1993, 2000, 2004).

Systematic descriptions

Order Productida Sarytcheva and Sokolskaya, 1959
Suborder Chonetidina Muir-Wood, 1955
Superfamily Chonetoidea Bronn, 1862
Family Rugosochonetidae Muir-Wood, 1962
Subfamily Capillomesolobinae Pečar, 1986
Genus Capillomesolobus Pečar, 1986

  • Type species.—Capillomesolobus karavankensis Pečar, 1986.

  • Capillomesolobus heritschi Pečar, 1986
    Figure 6.1

  • Chonetes sinuosa Schellwien, 1900, p. 38, pl. 9, figs. 17, 18.

  • Chonetes sp. Heritsch, 1938, p. 103, pl. 7, figs. 6, 7.

  • Mesolobus mesolobus (Norwood and Pratten). Nakamura, 1959, p. 205. pl. 2. figs. 2. 3; Minato et al. 1979. pl. 46. fig. 11.

  • Mesolobus sp. Tazawa, 1979, p. 25, pl. 4, fig. 2.

  • Capillomesolobus heritschi Pečar, 1986, p. 28, pl. 3, figs. 1–9, text-fig. 11; Tazawa and Nakamura, 2015, p. 159, figs. 4.1—4.3.

  • Material.—One specimen from locality AR5, external and internal moulds of a ventral valve, IGPS96237.

  • Remarks.—This specimen was previously described by Tazawa (1979) as Mesolobus sp. The Matsukawa specimen can be referred to Capillomesolobus heritschi Pečar (1986, p. 28, pl. 3, figs. 1–9, text-fig. 11), from the Trogkofel Limestone of the Karavanke Mountains, Slovenia, in its small size (length about 10 mm, width about 12 mm), deep ventral sulcus with median lobe, and numerous capillae (numbering 13–14 in 2 mm at midlength) on the external surface of the ventral valve. Comparison with the other species of Capillomesolobus has been discussed by Tazawa and Nakamura (2015, p. 161).

  • Distribution.—Sakmarian—Wordian: Balkan States (Slovenia) and northeastern Japan (South Kitakami Belt).

  • Subfamily Svalbardiinae Archbold, 1982
    Genus Dyoros Stehli, 1954
    Subgenus Dyoros (Dyoros) Stehli, 1954

  • Type species.—Chonetes consanguineous Girty, 1929.

  • Dyoros (Dyoros) sp.
    Figure 6.2

  • Neochonetes sp. Tazawa, 1979, p. 25, pl. 4, fig. 1.

  • Material.—One specimen from locality AR5, internal mould of a ventral valve, IGPS96238.

  • Remarks.—This specimen is assigned to the subgenus Dyoros (Dyoros) by its large, transverse ventral valve (length 13 mm, width 25 mm), with large, angular ears, deep sulcus and short median septum. The Matsukawa species somewhat resembles Dyoros (Dyoros) sp., described by Tazawa (2008a, p. 23, figs. 3.18, 3.19) from the Takakurayama Formation of the Takakurayama area, South Kitakami Belt (Abukuma Mountains), northeastern Japan. Accurate comparison is, however, difficult because of poor preservation of the present material.

  • Suborder Productidina Waagen, 1883
    Superfamily Marginiferoidea Stehli, 1954
    Family Marginiferidae Stehli, 1954
    Subfamily Marginiferinae Stehli, 1954
    Genus Transermatia Waterhouse, 1975

  • Type species.—Productus gratiosus Waagen, 1884.

  • Transennatia gratiosa (Waagen, 1884)
    Figure 6.3

  • Productus gratiosus Waagen, 1884, p. 691, pl. 72, figs. 3–7; Diener, 1897. p. 23. pl. 3. figs. 3–7; Mansuy. 1913. p. 115. pl. 13. fig. 1; Diener. 1915. p. 70. pl. 7. fig. 4; Colani. 1919. p. 10. pl. 1. fig. 2; Chao. 1927. p. 44. pl. 4. figs. 6–10; Chi-Thuan. 1962. p. 491. pl. 2. figs. 5–7.

  • Productus (Dictyoclostus) gratiosus Waagen. Huang, 1933, p. 88, pl. 11, fig. 14; Hayasaka, 1960, p. 49, pl. 1, fig. 8.

  • Marginifera gratiosa (Waagen). Reed, 1944, p. 98, pl. 19, figs. 6, 7.

  • Dictyoclostus gratiosus (Waagen). Zhang and Ching (Jin), 1961, p. 411, pl. 4, figs. 12–18; Wang et al., 1964, p. 291, pl. 45, figs. 14–19; Leman, 1994, pl. 1, figs. 11–13.

  • Gratiosina gratiosa (Waagen). Grant, 1976, pl. 33, figs. 19–26; Licharew and Kotlyar, 1978, pl. 12, figs. 5, 6; pl. 20, fig. 1; Minato et al., 1979. pl. 61. figs. 11–13.

  • Asioproductus gratiosus (Waagen). Yang et al., 1977, p. 350, pl. 140, fig. 5; Feng and Jiang, 1978, p. 254, pl. 90, figs. 1, 2; Tong, 1978, p. 228, pl. 80. fig. 7; Lee et al., 1980, p. 373, pl. 164, fig. 14; pl. 166, figs. 5, 6.

  • Asioproductus bellus Chan (Zhan), 1979, p. 85, pl. 6, figs. 7–13; pl. 9, figs. 8–10, text-fig. 18.

  • Gratiosina sp. Minato et al., 1979, pl. 61, fig. 14.

  • Dictyoclostus minor Lee and Gu in Lee et al., 1980, p. 372, pl. 166, figs. 1–4.

  • Transennatia gratiosus (Waagen). Wang et al., 1982, p. 214, pl. 92, figs. 6–8; pl. 102, figs. 4–9; Liu et al., 1982, p. 185, pl. 132, fig. 9; Ding and Qi, 1983, p. 280, pl. 95, fig. 14; Zeng et al., 1995, pl. 5, figs. 14, 15.

  • Transennatia gratiosa (Waagen). Yang, 1984, p. 219, pl. 33, fig. 7; Jin, 1985, pl. 4, figs. 33, 34, 45, 46; Tazawa and Matsumoto, 1998, p. 6, pl. 1, figs. 4–8; Tazawa et al., 2000, p. 7, pl. 1, figs. 3–5; Tazawa, 2001b, p. 289, figs. 6.1–6.7; Tazawa and Ibaraki, 2001, p. 7, pl. 1, figs. 1–3; Shen et al., 2002, p. 676, figs. 4.27–4.31 ; Tazawa, 2002, fig. 10.2; Chen et al., 2005. p. 354, fig. 10E–H, 11; Tazawa. 2008a, p. 26, fig. 4.1; Tazawa, 2008b, p. 43, figs. 6.6, 6.7; Shen and Zhang, 2008, figs. 4.20–4.22; Shen and Clapham, 2009, p. 718, pl. 1, figs. 13–22; Shen and Shi, 2009, p. 157, fig. 3K–O; Tazawa et al., 2014. p. 378. figs. 2.2. 2.3; Tazawa. 2015, p. 65. figs. 6.2. 6.3.

  • Material.—Two specimens from locality KZ9: (1) external mould of a ventral valve, UHR17098; and (2) external mould of a dorsal valve, UHR17099.

  • Remarks.—The specimens from Matsukawa are poorly preserved, but they can be referred to Transennatia gratiosa (Waagen, 1884, p. 691, pl. 72, figs. 3–7), from the Wargal and Chhidru formations of the Salt Range, Pakistan, on the basis of their small size (length 12 mm, width 16 mm in the dorsal valve specimen, UHR17099), large triangular ears, strongly geniculated dorsal valve with nearly flat visceral disc and moderately long trail, and sharply reticulate ornament on visceral discs of both ventral and dorsal valves, although the Matsukawa specimens are smaller in size than the Pakistani specimens. Dictyoclostus minor Lee and Gu (in Lee et al., 1980), from the Miaoling Formation of Jilin, northeastern China, is probably a junior synonym of Transennatia gratiosa.

  • Distribution.—Wordian-Changhsingian: northwestern China (Shaanxi), northeastern China (Heilongjiang and Jilin), eastern Russia (South Primorye), northeastern Japan (South Kitakami Belt), central Japan (Hida Gaien Belt and Hitachi), southwestern Japan (Mizukoshi in central Kyushu), eastern China (Anhui, Zhejiang and Jiangxi), central-southern China (Hubei, Hunan, Guangdong and Guangxi), southwestern China (Guizhou, Sichuan and Yunnan), Tibet (Xizang), Vietnam, Cambodia, Malaysia, Nepal (Kumaon Himalayas), Pakistan (Salt Range), India (Kashmir) and Greece.

  • Figure 6.

    1, Capillomesolobus heritschi Pečar; 1a, b, external latex cast of ventral valve, IGPS96237; 2, Dyotos (Dyotos) sp.; 2a, b, internal mould of ventral valve, IGPS96238; 3, Transennatia gratiosa (Waagen); 3a, b, external mould of dorsal valve, IGPS17099; 4-6, Hexiproductus echidniformis (Chao); 4, internal mould of ventral valve, KCG050; 5, external mould of dorsal valve, KCG051; 6, external mould of dorsal valve, KCG053; 7, Yakovlevia mammata (Keyserling); 7a, b, internal mould and internal latex cast of ventral valve, KCG015; 8, 9, Urushtenoidea crenulata (Ding); 8a–e, ventral, posterior, anterior and lateral views of internal mould of ventral valve, UHR30387; 9, internal mould of dorsal valve, UHR17068; 10, Costatumulus cancriniformis (Tschernyschew); 10a–d, ventral, anterior, posterior and lateral views of internal mould of ventral valve, IGPS96217; 11, Pertmmdaria tenuistriata Tazawa; 11a, b, external mould and external latex cast of dorsal valve, KCG014; 12, Yakovlevia kaluzinensis Fredericks, internal mould of ventral valve, KCG008. Scale bars represent 1 cm.

    f06_265.jpg

    Family Paucispiniferidae Muir-Wood and Cooper, 1960
    Subfamily Paucispiniferinae Muir-Wood and Cooper, 1960
    Genus Hexiproductus Shi, Chen and Tong, 2008

  • Type species.—Productus echidniformis Chao, 1925.

  • Hexiproductus echidniformis (Chao, 1925)
    Figures 6.4–6.6

  • Productus echidniformis Grabau emend. Chao, 1925, p. 239, pl. 2, figs. 7–9.

  • Avonia echidniformis (Grabau emend. Chao). Chao, 1927, p. 120, pl. 14, figs. 17–27; Chao, 1928. p. 55, pl. 6, fig. 7; Ozaki. 1931, p. 108, pl. 10, figs. 6–9; Nakamura, 1959, p. 201, pl. 1. figs. 2–8; Volgin, 1960, p. 47, pl. 4, fig. 4; Sergunkova and Zhizhilo, 1975, p. 60, pl. 9, fig. 7; Lee and Gu, 1976, p. 240, pl. 141, fig. 1; Minato et al., 1979, pl. 46, figs. 15–17; Lee et al., 1980. p. 350, pl. 145, fig. 25; Lee and Duan, 1985, p. 227, pl. 66, figs. 16–21; Zhan and Wu. 1987. p. 203, pl. 47, figs. 23–25; He et al., 1995, pl. 56, figs. 51, 52, 61–64; Wang, 1995, pl. 1, fig. 4; Wang and Yang, 1998, p. 67, pl. 3, figs. 21–25.

  • Productus (Avonia) echidniformis Grabau and Chao. Licharew, 1939, p. 86, pl. 17, figs. 9, 10.

  • Avonia sp. Minato et al., 1979, pl. 46, figs. 13, 14.

  • Avonia echidniformis (Grabau emend. Chao). Zhang et al., 1983, p. 286, pl. 131, fig. 1.

  • Avonia”? echidniformis (Grabau emend. Chao). Chen and Shi, 2002, p. 299, fig. 4J.

  • Breileenia echidniformis (Grabau in Chao). Chen and Shi, 2006, p. 137, pl. 1, figs. 13, 14; text-fig. 10.

  • Hexiproductus echidniformis (Grabau in Chao). Shi et al., 2008, p. 290, figs. 6A–6D.

  • Hexiproductus echidniformis (Chao). Tazawa and Nakamura, 2015, p. 161, figs. 4.4–4.10.

  • Material.—Four specimens from localities AR4 and KZ9: (1) internal mould of a ventral valve, KCG050; and (2) external moulds of three dorsal valves, KCG051-053.

  • Description.—Shell medium in size for genus, transversely subrectangular in outline, hinge slightly shorter than greatest width at midlength; length about 17 mm, width about 35 mm in the largest dorsal valve specimen (KCG052). Ventral valve strongly and unevenly convex in lateral profile, most convex in umbonal region, gently convex visceral disc; umbo small, incurved and overhanging hingeline a little; ears small, not clearly demarcated from visceral region; sulcus shallow on visceral region. Dorsal valve moderately concave, with deeply concave umbonal region and nearly flat visceral disc, roundly geniculated, and followed by a short trail; fold absent. External surface of ventral valve ornamented with strong costae and irregular fine concentric rugae; costae bearing numerous elongate spine bases. External ornament of dorsal valve similar to that of ventral valve, but no spine bases. Internal structures of ventral valve not clearly preserved and obscure.

  • Remarks.—These specimens can be referred to Hexiproductus echidniformis (Chao, 1925), originally described from the upper Carboniferous-lower Permian of Gansu, northwestern China and Shanxi, northern China, in shape and external ornament of both valves. The Matsukawa specimens most resemble the shells described by Tazawa and Nakamura (2015) as Hexiproductus echidniformis (Chao, 1925) from the lower part of the Hosoo Formation of Nakadaira, South Kitakami Belt, in size, outline and external ornament of both the ventral and dorsal valves.

  • Distribution.—Kasimovian-Wordian: Uzbekistan (Fergana), northwestern China (Xinjiang, Gansu and Ningxia), northern China (Inner Mongolia, Shanxi and Hebei), northeastern China (Liaoning), northeastern Japan (South Kitakami Belt) and eastern China (Shandong).

  • Superfamily Aulostegoidea Muir-Wood and Cooper, 1960
    Family Echinostegidae Muir-Wood and Cooper, 1960
    Subfamily Chonosteginae Muir-Wood and Cooper, 1960
    Genus Uruslitenoidea Jin and Hu, 1978

  • Type species.—Unishtenia chaoi Jin, 1963.

  • Uruslitenoidea crenulata (Ding in Yang et al., 1962)
    Figures 6.8, 6.9

  • Eomarginifera crenulata Ding in Yang et al., 1962, p. 85, pl. 37, figs. 6–8.

  • Unishtenia crenulata (Ding). Jin, 1963, p. 20, 29, pl. 1, figs. 17–24; pl. 2, figs. 9, 10, 18–20. text-fig. 5; Jin et al., 1974, p. 309, pl. 162, figs. 1–3; Yang et al., 1977. p. 335, pl. 136, fig. 11; Tong, 1978, p. 218, pl. 78, fig. 17; Yang and Gao, 1996. pl. 34. figs. 7, 8.

  • Uruslitenoidea crenulata (Ding). Nakamura, 1979, p. 228, pl. 1, figs. 5–9; pl. 3. figs. 1, 2; Yang, 1984, p. 213, pl. 31, fig. 19; Jin, 1985, pl. 6, fig. 41; Tazawa, 2001b, p. 296, figs. 7.1–7.9; Shen et al., 2003, p. 1131, figs. 4.11–4.13; Tazawa, 2008b, p. 50, figs. 7.15, 7.16; Shen and Shi, 2009, p. 155, fig. 3B–I.

  • Uruslitenoidea maceus (Jin). Nakamura, 1979, p. 227, pl. 1, figs. 1–4; pl. 2, figs. 1–3; Minato et al., 1979, pl. 65, figs. 8–11; Tazawa, 2002. fig. 10.8.

  • Uncisteges crenulata (Ding). Liu et al., 1982, p. 178, pl. 129, fig. 1; Zhu, 1990. p. 74. pl. 14. figs. 4–14; pl. 17, fig. 12.

  • Material.—Three specimens from localities AR4 and KZ9: (1) internal moulds of two ventral valves, UHR30387, 30388; and (2) internal mould of a dorsal valve, UHR17068.

  • Remarks.—These specimens can be referred to Urushtenoidea crenulata (Ding in Yang et al., 1962), from the Maokouan of Qinghai, northwestern China, in their small, transversely subquadrate shell (length about 15 mm, width about 21 mm in the largest dorsal valve specimen, UHR17068), numerous fine costae (6-7 in 5 mm) on the ventral trail, and internal structures of the dorsal valve consisting of long median septum, small and highly raised adductor scars, and prominent brachial ridges. Urushtenoidea maceus Jin (1963, p. 19, pl. 2, figs. 1–6), from the Chihsian and Maokouan of eastern China (Jiangsu, Anhui and Zhejiang) and central-southern China (Hubei), differs from U. crenulata in having finer costae on the ventral valve. Uruslitenoidea chaoi Jin (1963, p. 15, 28, pl. 1, figs. 1–4, 9–12; pl. 2, figs. 7, 8, 13–17), from the upper Chihsian-lower Maokouan of Jiangxi and Anhui, eastern China, is readily distinguished from the present species in having coarser costae on the ventral valve.

  • Distribution.—Kungurian-Wucliiapingian: northwestern China (Qinghai and Gansu), northeastern Japan (South Kitakami Belt), central Japan (Hida Gaien Belt), southwestern Japan (Mizukoshi in Kyushu Island), eastern China (Jiangsu and Fujian), central-southern China (Hubei, Hunan, Guangdong and Guangxi), southwestern China (Sichuan), Tibet (Xizan), Laos and Cambodia.

  • Family Scacchinellidae Licharew, 1928
    Subfamily Scacchinellinae Licharew, 1928
    Genus Scacchinella Gemmellaro, 1891

  • Type species.—Scacchinella variabilis Gemmellaro, 1891.

  • Scacchinella gigantea Schellwien, 1900
    Figures 7.8, 7.9

  • Scacchinella gigantea Schellwien, 1900, p. 35, pl. 4, figs. 1–3; pl. 5, figs. 1–8, text-figs. 5, 6, 8; Heritsch, 1938, p. 101, pl. 5, figs. 1, 2, 9; Licharew, 1939, p. 96, pl. 23, fig. 2; Ramo vs, 1965, p. 357, pl. 13, figs. 3–6; Tazawa and Araki, 1999, p. 453, figs. 2.1–2.4.

  • Material.—Five specimens from locality KZ9: (1) external mould of a ventral valve, NU-B197; and (2) internal moulds of four ventral valves, NU-B198-201.

  • Remarks.—These specimens were described by Tazawa and Araki (1999) as Scacchinella gigantea Schellwien, 1900. The Matsukawa specimens are strongly deformed and imperfect, but they can be referred to Scacchinella gigantea Schellwien (1900, p. 35, pl. 4, figs. 1–3; pl. 5, figs. 1–8, text-figs. 5, 6, 8), from the Trogkofel Formation of the Carnic Alps, by the medium to large, transversely subelliptical ventral valve with a broad and very shallow depression in the middle of the anterior side of the valve. Scacchinella exasperata Cooper and Grant (1975, p. 921, pl. 271, figs. 14–24; pl. 273, figs. 26–28), from the lower Wolfcampian of West Texas, differs from S. gigantea in the more rounded cylindrical outline and in having a broader ventral interarea. Scacchinella titan Cooper and Grant (1975, p. 923, pl. 270, figs. 12–16; pl. 272, figs. 1–6; pl. 273, figs. 1–25; pl. 274, figs. 16; pl. 275, figs. 1–4; pl. 276, figs. 1–3; pl. 277, figs. 1–4; pl. 278, figs. 1–19; pl. 279, figs. 1–9; pl. 280, figs. 1–8; pl. 281, figs. 1–18; pl. 282, figs. 1–19; pl. 283, figs. 1–22; pl. 284, figs. 16–30), from the upper Wolfcampian of West Texas, differs from the present species in the larger dimensions, more rounded, nearly circular anterior profile and much broader ventral interarea.

  • Distribution.—Asselian-Capitanian: Balkan States (Slovenia), central Russia (southern Urals), Uzbekistan (Fergana) and northeastern Japan (South Kitakami Belt).

  • Figure 7.

    1, Costatumulus cancriniformis (Tschernyschew); 1a, b, external latex cast of ventral valve, IGPS96218; 2–4, Linoproductus hayasakai Tazawa; 2a, b, external latex cast and internal mould of ventral valve, IGPS96239 (holotype); 3, external latex cast of ventral valve, IGPS96241; 4, external latex cast of dorsal valve, IGPS96249; 5–7, Neorichthofenia mabutii (Tazawa and Araki); 5a–f ventral, anterior, posterior and lateral views of internal mould of ventral valve, and internal mould of dorsal valve, IGPS98870 (holotype); 6, external mould of dorsal valve, IGPS98877; 7a–c, ventral view of internal mould of ventral valve, and internal mould of dorsal valve, IGPS98872; 8, 9, Scacchinella gigantea Schellwien; 8, anterior view of external latex cast of ventral valve, NU-B197; 9a, b, anterior and posterior views of internal mould of ventral valve, NU-B 198. Scale bars represent 1cm

    f07_265.jpg

    Superfamily Linoproductoidea Stehli, 1954
    Family Linoproductidae Stehli, 1954
    Subfamily Linoproductinae Stehli, 1954
    Genus Linoproductus Chao, 1927

  • Type species.—Productus cora d'Orbigny, 1842.

  • Linoproductus hayasakai Tazawa, 1979
    Figures 7.2–7.4

  • Productus cora d'Orbigny. Hayasaka, 1925, p. 94, pl. 5, figs. 7–9.

  • Linoproductus cora (d'Orbigny). Hayasaka and Minato, 1956, p. 145, pl. 23, figs. 9, 10; Tazawa, 1976, pl. 2, fig. 11; Minato et al., 1979, pl. 62, figs. 1, 2; Tazawa and Ibaraki, 2001, p. 10, pl. 1, figs. 11–13; pl. 2, figs. 1–8.

  • Linoproductus sp. Minato et at., 1979, pl. 62, figs. 3, 4.

  • Linoproductus hayasakai Tazawa, 1979, p. 26, pl. 4, figs. 5–11.

  • Material.—Eleven specimens from locality AR5: (1) external and internal moulds of four ventral valves, IGPS96239 (holotype), IGPS96240-96242; (2) external mould of a ventral valve, IGPS96243; (3) internal moulds of five ventral valves, IGPS96244-96248; and (4) external mould of one dorsal valve, IGPS96249.

  • Description.—Shell medium in size for genus, equidimensional subquadrate in outline, with greatest width at hinge; length 41 mm, width 42 mm in the holotype (IGPS96243). Ventral valve moderately convex in lateral profile, most convex at umbonal slope, not geniculated; umbo massive, strongly incurved and overhanging hingeline a little; ears large, flattened, extremities blunt, angular; sulcus absent; lateral slopes steep. Dorsal valve moderately concave, with deeply concave umbonal region, nearly flat visceral disc, strongly geniculated and followed by a short trail; fold absent. External surface of ventral valve ornamented with numerous regular costellae on whole valve, and concentric rugae on ears; costellae intercalated and bifurcated anteriorly, numbering 15–18 in 10 mm at midlength of valve; no spines or spine bases. External ornament of dorsal valve similar to those of ventral valve, but concentric rugae stronger and developed on both ears and visceral disc; no spines or spine bases. Internal structures of both valves not well preserved.

  • Remarks.—These specimens were described by Tazawa (1979) as a new species, Linoproductus hayasakai, which is characterized by its medium size, fine costellae and no spines on the ventral valve. The type species, Linoproductus cora (d'Orbigny, 1842), redescribed by Tschemyschew (1902, p. 279, 621, pl. 33, figs. 2, 3; pl. 35, fig. 1; pl. 54, figs. 1–5, text-figs. 69–71), from the lower Permian of Tinian, northern Russia, differs from L. hayasakai in its larger size and in having coarser costellae and sporadically distributed spines on the ventral valve. Linoproductus kaseti Grant (1976, p. 154, pl. 41, figs. 8–28), from the Rat Buri Limestone of Phangnga, southern Thailand, is also a medium-sized Linoproductus species, but the Thailand species differs from the present species in its elongate outline and in having coarser costellae and some spines on the ventral valve.

  • Distribution.—Wordian: northeastern Japan (South Kitakami Belt).

  • Genus Costatumulus Waterhouse in Waterhouse and Briggs, 1986

  • Type species.—Auriculispina tumida Waterhouse in Waterhouse, Briggs and Parfrey, 1983.

  • Costatumulus cancriniformis (Tschemyschew, 1889)
    Figures 6.10, 7.1

  • Productus cancriniformis Tschemyschew, 1889, p. 283, 373, pl. 7, figs. 32, 33; Tschemyschew, 1902, p. 292, 629, pl. 52, figs. 5, 6; Fredericks. 1925. p. 27. pl. 4. figs. 115. 116.

  • Cancrinella cancriniformis (Tschemyschew). Kaschirzew, 1959, p. 39, pl. 15, figs. 4, 5; Solomina, 1960, p. 49, pl. 8, figs. 3–7; Ustritsky and Tschernjak, 1963, p. 84, pl. 13, figs. 6–8; pl. 14, figs. 1–5; Abramov, 1970, p. 124, pl. 5, figs. 9–12; Solomina, 1970, p. 85, pl. 5, fig. 9; Zavodowsky and Stepanov, 1970, p. 101, pl. 24, fig. 8; pl. 27, fig. 10; pl. 35, figs. 4–7; Grigorjeva et al., 1977, p. 134, pl. 20, fig. 1; Tazawa, 1979, p. 27, pl. 4, figs. 3, 4; Lee and Duan, 1985, p. 239, pl. 75, figs. 2–5; Pavlova and Lazarev in Tatarinov et al., 1991. p. 114. pl. 26. figs. 5. 6. 8. 14; Kalashnikov. 1993. p. 81. pl. 33. fig. 10.

  • Costatumulus cancriniformis (Tschemyschew). Shen et al., 2000, p. 743.

  • Material.—Two specimens from locality AR5, external and internal moulds of two ventral valves, IGPS96217, 96218.

  • Description.—Shell medium in size for genus, subcircular in outline, with greatest width at midlength; length 24 mm, width 26 mm in the better preserved specimen (IGPS96217). Ventral valve strongly convex in both lateral and anterior profiles; umbo small, strongly incurved; ears small; sulcus absent. External surface of ventral valve ornamented with numerous fine costellae, quincuncially arranged elongate spine bases and numerous, somewhat undulated concentric rugae; numbering 12–13 costellae and 4 rugae in 5 mm at about midlength of valve.

  • Remarks.—These specimens are referred to Costatumulus cancriniformis (Tschemyschew, 1889, p. 283, 373, pl. 7, figs. 32,33), from the lower Permian (Artinskian) of the northern Urals, by the strongly inflated ventral valve, ornamented with numerous undulated concentric rugae. Costatumulus tazawai Shen, Archbold, Shi and Chen (2000, p. 743, figs. 12.1–12.8, 12.11–12.14), from the Selong Group (Wuchiapingian) of Xizang (Tibet), differs from C. cancriniformis in having more numerous, finer costellae on the ventral valve. The type species, Costatumulus tumida (Waterhouse in Waterhouse et al., 1983, p. 133, pl. 3, figs. 2–4. 6, 7), from the Tiverton Formation of the Bowen Basin, Queensland, eastern Australia, is readily distinguished from the present species in having less strong concentric rugae on the ventral valve.

  • Distribution.—Moscovian-Wordian; northern Russia (Timan, Pechora Basin, northern Urals, Taimyr Peninsula, Verkhoyansk Range and Kolyma-Omolon), southern Mongolia, northern China (Shanxi), eastern Russia (South Primorye) and northeastern Japan (South Kitakami Belt).

  • Family Kansuellidae Muir-Wood and Cooper, 1960
    Subfamily Auriculispininae Waterhouse in Waterhouse and Briggs, 1986
    Genus Permundaria Nakamura, Kato and Choi, 1970

  • Type species.—Permundaria asiatica Nakamura, Kato and Choi, 1970.

  • Permundaria tenuistriata Tazawa, 1974
    Figure 6.11

  • Permundaria tenuistriata Tazawa, 1974, p. 317, pl. 43, figs. 1, 2.

  • Material.—One specimen from locality AR4, external mould of a dorsal valve, KCG014.

  • Remarks.—The material available is lacking the ventral valve, but it can be referred to Permundaria tenuistriata Tazawa, 1974, from the lower part of the Kamiyasse Formation of the Kamiyasse—Imo area, South Kitakami Belt, northeastern Japan, on account of its large (length 45 mm, width about 50 mm), semicircular and almost flat dorsal valve, ornamented by numerous regular concentric rugae and numerous capillae (11–12 capillae in 2 mm at about midlength). Permundaria asiatica Nakamura, Kato and Choi (1970, p. 296, pl. 2, figs. 1, 2), from the lower part of the Kanokura Formation of the Setamai area, South Kitakami Belt and from the middle Permian (Capitanian) of Sisophon, western Cambodia, is distinguished from P. tenuistriata in having coarser capillae (6–8 in 3 mm at 10 mm from umbo) on the ventral valve.

  • Distribution.—Wordian: northeastern Japan (South Kitakami Belt).

  • Family Yakovleviidae Waterhouse, 1975
    Genus Yakovlevia Fredericks, 1925

  • Type species.—Yakovlevia kaluzinensis Fredericks, 1925.

  • Yakovlevia mammata (Keyserling, 1846)
    Figure 6.7

  • Productusmammatus Keyserling, 1846, p. 206, pl. 4, fig. 5; de Koninck, 1847, p. 49, pl. 7, fig. 4; Tschemyschew, 1902, p. 295, pl. 35, figs. 4–6; Keidel, 1906, p. 367, pl. 12, fig. 5.

  • Linoproductus? mammatus (Keyserling). Chao, 1927, p. 146, pl. 15, figs. 10–14.

  • Productus (Linoproductus?) mammatus Keyserling. Grabau, 1931, p. 288, pl. 29, figs. 10–14.

  • Productus (Thomasina) mammatus Keyserling. Stepanov, 1937, p. 127, 177. pl. 2, figs. 5–7.

  • Muirwoodia mammata (Keyserling). Muir-Wood and Cooper, 1960, pl. 120, figs. 9–11; Harker in Harker and Thorsteinsson, 1960, p. 58, pl. 16, figs. 1–5; Gobbett, 1963, p. 112, pl. 13, figs. 23–28; Lee and Gu, 1976, p. 263, pl. 159, figs. 7–9; pl. 163, fig. 2; pl. 164, figs. 3, 4; pl. 170, figs. 6, 7; Licharew and Kotlyar, 1978, pl. 14, figs. 3–5; Liu and Waterhouse, 1985, p. 17, pl. 4, figs. 4–6; Nakamura et al., 1992, pl. 1. fig. 4; Kalashnikov. 1993, p. 63, pl. 19, figs. 1–3.

  • Yakovlevia mammatus (Keyserling). Kotlyar, 1961, text-figs. 4–6.

  • Yakovlevia mammata (Keyserling). Brabb and Grant, 1971, p. 16, pl. 1. figs. 9–12. 33–36; Ifanova, 1972, p. 121, pl. 7, figs. 4, 5; Kalashnikov, 1986, pl. 121, figs. 5, 6; Malkowski, 1988, p. 40, pl. 5, fig. 6; Zhang, 1990, pl. 2, figs. 4, 7, 9; Tazawa, 1999b, p. 90, figs. 3.1–3.5; Wang and Zhang, 2003, p. 85, pl. 6, figs. 1–8; pl. 7, figs. 1–10; Klets, 2005, pl. 11, figs. 1–7.

  • Yakovlevia paramammata Lee and Gu in Lee et al., 1980, p. 382, pl. 171, figs. 4, 15.

  • Muirwoodia sp. Tazawa, 1987, fig. 1.6.

  • Material.—One specimen from locality AR4, internal mould of a ventral valve, KCG015.

  • Remarks.—The single ventral valve specimen from Matsukawa is safely assigned to the genus Yakovlevia by the flattened, transversely subtrapezoidal ventral valve, with large diductor scars which are striated and encircled by a strong ridge posterolaterally. This specimen is referred to Yakovlevia mammata (Keyserling, 1846), from the lower Permian (Sakmarian?) of the Pechora Basin, northern Russia, in its small size (length 19 mm, width 33 mm), and in having large, acute ears and a narrow, moderately deep sulcus on the trail. Yakovlevia greenlandica (Dunbar, 1955, p. 103, pl. 16, figs. 1–17), from the Guadalupian of eastern Greenland, is also a small-sized Yakovlevia species, but the Greenlandic species is distinguished from Y. mammata by its less transverse outline. Yakovlevia mammatiformis (Fredericks, 1926, p. 87, pl. 3, figs. 4–6), from the lower Permian (Artinskian) of the Pechora Basin, northern Russia, is clearly distinguished from the present species by its larger size and more transverse outline.

  • Distribution.—Kasimovian-Capitanian: northern USA (Alaska), northern Canada (Devon Island), Spitsbergen, northern Russia (Timan, Pechora Basin and Verkhoyansk Range), northwestern China (Xinjiang), northern China (Inner Mongolia), northeastern China (Heilongjiang), eastern Russia (South Primorye) and northeastern Japan (South Kitakami Belt).

  • Yakovlevia kaluzinensis Fredericks, 1925
    Figure 6.12

  • Chonetes (Yakovlevia) kaluzinensis Fredericks, 1925, p. 7, pl. 2, figs. 64–66.

  • Yakovlevia kaluzinensis Fredericks. Kotlyar, 1961, text-figs. 1–3; Licharew and Kotlyar, 1978, pl. 14, figs. 1, 2; Manankov, 1998, pl. 8, figs. 18, 19; Tazawa, 1999b, p. 90, figs. 3.7–3.15; Tazawa, 2001b, p. 291, figs. 6.20–6.25; Tazawa, 2008b, p. 49, fig. 7.14; Tazawa and Araki, 2013, p. 5, fig. 2.2.

  • Material.—One specimen from locality AR5, internal mould of a ventral valve, KCG008.

  • Remarks.—This specimen was described by Tazawa and Araki (2013) as Yakovlevia kaluzinensis Fredericks, 1925, originally described by Fredericks (1925, p. 7, pl. 2, figs. 64–66) from the Chandalaz Formation of the Vladivostok area, South Primorye, eastern Russia. Yakovlevia impressa (Toula, 1875, p. 236, pl. 5, fig. 11), from the middle Permian of Spitsbergen, differs from Y. kaluzinensis in having larger and more prominent ears. The preceding species, Yakovlevia mammata (Keyserling, 1846), is distinguished from the present species by its much smaller size and the larger and more acute ears.

  • Distribution.—Kungurian—Wucliiapingian?: southern Mongolia, eastern Russia (South Primorye), northeastern Japan (South Kitakami Belt), central Japan (Hida Gaien Belt) and southwestern Japan (Mizukoshi in central Kyushu).

  • Superfamily Richthofenioidea Cooper and Grant, 1975
    Family Hercosiidae Cooper and Grant, 1975
    Genus Neorichthofenia Shen, He and Zhu, 1992

  • Type species.—Richthofenia mabutii Tazawa and Araki, 1984b.

  • Neorichthofenia mabutii (Tazawa and Araki, 1984b)
    Figures 7.5–7.7

  • Richthofenia mabutii Tazawa and Araki, 1984b, p. 3, pl. 1, figs. 1–7.

  • Neorichthofenia mabutii (Tazawa and Araki). Shen et al., 1992, p. 180, pl. 3. figs. 13–22.

  • Material.—Eight specimens from locality AR4: (1) internal moulds of five conjoined shells, IGPS98870 (holotype), 98871-98874; (2) internal moulds of two ventral valves, IGPS98875. 98876; and (3) external mould of a dorsal valve, IGPS98877.

  • Description.—Shell medium in size for genus, highly conical in shape; hinge shorter than greatest width at about midlength; length about 12 mm, width about 19 mm, height about 15 mm in the holotype (IGPS98870); length 13 mm, width 14 mm in the sole dorsal valve specimen (IGPS98877). External features of ventral valve unknown. Dorsal valve semicircular in outline, almost flat and slightly concave in both lateral and anterior profiles; hinge short and straight; posterior projection (neck) long and slender. External surface of dorsal valve ornamented with 5 concentric rugae and numerous fine pustules on visceral disc, and numerous fine prostrate spines on front of valve. Internally, ventral valve being a deep conical cavity, with a broad low median ridge anteriorly and an elongate trigonal median hollow posteriorly; median ridge developed on anterior half or more; median hollow corresponding to interarea and pseudodeltidimn of ventral valve; internal surface of ventral cavity covered by numerous fine irregular radial ribs and some strong concentric rugae near commissure. Dorsal interior with a weak median septum, a bilobed cardinal process bearing a long shaft, and a pair of dendritic adductor scars; endospines occurring in a row at one-third length from anterior margin of valve.

  • Remarks.—The specimens from Matsukawa were described by Tazawa and Araki (1984b) as a new species, Richthofenia mabutii. Subsequently Shen et al. (1992) proposed the genus Neorichthofenia with the Matsukawa species as type species. Neorichthofenia is characterized by having a median ridge in the ventral valve. No other species have been assigned to the genus.

  • Distribution.—Wordian—Changhsingian: northeastern Japan (South Kitakami Belt) and southwestern China (Sichuan).

  • Suborder Lyttoniidina Williams, Harper and Grant, 2000
    Superfamily Lyttonioidea Waagen, 1883
    Family Lyttoniidae Waagen, 1883
    Subfamily Lyttoniinae Waagen, 1883
    Genus Leptodus Kayser, 1883

  • Type species.—Leptodus richthofeni Kayser, 1883.

  • Leptodus nobilis (Waagen, 1883)
    Figures 8.1, 8.2

  • Lyttonia nobilis Waagen. 1883. p. 398. pl. 29, figs. 1–3; pl. 30, figs. 1, 2, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11; Noetling, 1904, p. 112, text-figs. 4–7; Noetling, 1905, p. 140, pl. 17, figs. 1,2; pl. 18, figs. 1–11, text-fig. 2; Mansuy, 1913, p. 123, pl. 13, fig. 10; Mansuy. 1914. p. 32, pl. 6. fig. 7; pl. 7, fig. 1; Albrecht, 1924, p. 289, fig. 1; Huang, 1932, p. 89, pl. 7, figs. 9, 10; pl. 8, figs. 8, 9; pl. 9, figs. 1–8, text-figs. 8–11.

  • Lyttonia sp. Yabe, 1900, p. 2, text-figs. 1, 2.

  • Oldhamina (Lyttonia) richthofeni var. nobilis Waagen. Fredericks, 1916, p. 76, pl. 4, fig. 2, text-fig. 22.

  • Lyttonia richthofeni Kayser. Hayasaka, 1917, p. 43, pl. 18, figs. 1–8; Hayasaka, 1922a, p. 62, pl. 11, figs. 1–6; Hayasaka, 1922b, p. 103, pl. 4, figs. 12, 13; Mashiko, 1934, p. 182, text-fig.

  • Lyttonia (Leptodus) richthofeni Kayser. Hamlet, 1928, p. 31, pl. 6, figs. 1–4.

  • Lyttonia richthofeni forma nobilis Waagen. Licharew, 1932, p. 69, 96, pl. 2, figs. 13, 14; pl. 5, figs. 1–4, 6, text-fig. 3.

  • Lyttonia cf. nobilis Waagen. Huang, 1936, p. 493, pl. 1, fig. 5.

  • Leptodus nobilis (Waagen). Termier and Termier, 1960, p. 241, text-pl. 3. figs. 1–10; Chi-Thuan, 1961. p. 274. pl. 1, fig. 1; Ding in Yang et al., 1962, p. 90, pl. 37, fig. 4; Schréter, 1963, p. 107, pl. 3, figs. 5–8; Cooper and Grant, 1974, pl. 191, figs. 8, 9; Grant, 1976. pl. 43, figs. 18, 19; Lee and Gu, 1976, p. 267. pl. 162, figs. 1, 2; Tazawa, 1976, pl. 2, fig. 8; Yang et al., 1977, p. 371, pl. 147, fig. 5; Feng and Jiang, 1978, p. 269, pl. 100, fig. 2; Licharew and Kotlyar, 1978, pl. 14, figs. 13–15; Jin et al., 1979, p. 82, pl. 23, fig. 15; Minato et al., 1979, pl. 66, figs. 1, 4, 5; Zhan, 1979, p. 93, pl. 9. fig. 12; Lee et al., 1980, p. 389, pl. 172, figs. 15, 16; Liao, 1980, pl. 6, figs. 42, 43; Wang et al., 1982, p. 229, pl. 95, fig. 20; Gu and Zhu, 1985, pl. 1, figs. 31, 33, 34; Liao and Meng, 1986, p. 81, pl. 2. figs. 24, 25; Sremac, 1986, p. 30, pl. 10, figs. 1, 2; Liang. 1990, p. 225, pl. 40, figs. 1, 5; Leman, 1994, pl. 1, figs. 3, 4; Zeng et al., 1995, pl. 11, fig. 3; Tazawa et al., 1998, p. 241, figs. 2.1, 2.2. 4; Tazawa and Matsumoto, 1998, p. 7, pl. 2, figs. 7–12; Kato et al., 1999, p. 47, fig. 4; Tazawa, 2001b, p. 297, figs. 7.13–7.16; Tazawa and Ibaraki, 2001, p. 11, pl. 1, figs. 7–10; Shen et al., 2002, p. 678, fig. 5.28; Tazawa, 2002, fig. 10.14; Tazawa. 2003, p. 31, figs. 4.1, 4.2; Wang and Zhang, 2003, p. 118, pl. 22, figs. 13–18; Tazawa, 2009, p. 71, fig. 4.7.

  • Gubleria armenica Sarytcheva, 1964, p. 68, pl. 8, figs. 1–3; Sarytcheva in Ruzhentsev and Sarytcheva, 1965, p. 39, figs. 9, 10.

  • Gubleria sp. Licharew and Kotlyar, 1978, pl. 15, figs. 5, 6.

  • Leptodus ivanovi Fredericks. Minato et al., 1979, pl. 66, fig. 3.

  • Leptodus sp. Minato et al., 1979, pl. 66, fig. 2.

  • Leptodus elongatus Ching and Hu. Wang et al., 1982, p. 229, pl. 91, figs. 16, 17; pl. 93, fig. 4.

  • Gubleria sp. Zhu, 1990, p. 80, pl. 16, fig. 24.

  • Leptodus sp. Yanagida et al., 1993, p. 5, pl. 1, figs. 8, 9.

  • Leptodus sp. Yanagida, 1996, fig. 2.14.

  • Leptodus sp. Tazawa, 1999a, p. 5, pl. 1, fig. 1; Tazawa et al., 1999, fig. 2.1.

  • Gubleria sp. Sone et al., 2001, p. 185, figs. 6.9–6.12.

  • Leptodus sp. Shen and Zhang, 2008, fig. 5.4.

  • Material.—Three specimens from locality AR4, internal moulds of three ventral valves, KCG016-018.

  • Description.—Shell small in size for genus, elongate subtrigonal to transversely oval in outline, scoop-shaped, with greatest width near anterior margin; length 30 mm, width 26 mm in an elongate specimen (KCG017), length 14 mm, width 28 mm in a transverse specimen (KCG018). Ventral interior with regularly and symmetrically arranged lateral ridges on both sides of median ridge; median ridge strong, extending for valve length; lateral ridges broad, solid (solidiseptate), nearly straight to slightly arched toward anterior, numbering 13 on each side of median septum in the elongate specimen (KCG017).

  • Remarks.—These specimens are referred to Leptodus nobilis (Waagen, 1883), originally described from the Wargal and Chhidru formations of the Salt Range, by their flat ventral valve with numerous, regularly and symmetrically disposed broad and solid lateral ridges on both sides of the median ridge. The Matsukawa specimens, being smaller than the type specimens of the Salt Range, may be young shells. Leptodus richthofeni Kayser, 1883, originally described by Kayser (1883, p. 161, pl. 21, figs. 9–11) from the upper Permian of Loping, Jiangxi Province, eastern China, and refigured by Cooper and Grant (1974, pl. 191, figs. 11–15) on the lectotype, is readily distinguished from L. nobilis by its more highly convex ventral valve and the sharp lateral ridges with wider interspaces.

  • Distribution.—Kungurian—Changhsingian: Hungary, Balkan States (Croatia and Serbia), Armenia (Transcaucasia), northwestern China (Qinghai), northern China (Inner Mongolia), northeastern China (Heilongjiang and Jilin), eastern Russia (South Primorye), northeastern Japan (South Kitakami Belt), central Japan (Hida Gaien and Mino belts), southwestern Japan (Maizuru and Akiyoshi belts), eastern China (Zhejiang, Fujian and Jiangxi), central-southern China (Hubei, Hunan, Guangdong and Guangxi), southwestern China (Guizhou, Sichuan and Yunnan), Cambodia, Malaysia, Timor and Pakistan (Salt and Khisor ranges).

  • Genus Keyserlingina Tschemyschew, 1902

  • Type species.—Keyserlingina schellwieni Tschemyschew, 1902.

  • Keyserlingina sp.
    Figure 8.3

  • Material.—One specimen from locality KZ9, internal mould of a ventral valve, KCG019.

  • Description.—Ventral internal plate small in size (length 10 mm, width 8 mm), nearly flat, elongate subcircular in outline, and marked with numerous fine pustules; median ridge long and broad, not well preserved in anterior parts; lateral ridges symmetrically arranged and slightly inclined towards front, numbering 2 on each side of median ridge.

  • Remarks.—The specimen from Matsukawa is safely assigned to the genus Keyserlingina on the basis of its small, nearly flat internal plate, with a broad median ridge and symmetrically arranged, broad and deeply grooved lateral ridges. The Matsukawa species resembles Keyserlingina filicis (Keyserling, 1853), redescribed by Tschernyschew (1902, p. 56, 474, pl. 42, figs. 16, 17) from the lower Permian Schwagerina Limestone of the Urals, in having lateral ridges slightly inclined towards the anterior. An accurate comparison is difficult for this poorly preserved specimen.

  • Figure 8.

    1, 2, Leptodus nobilis (Waagen); 1, internal mould of ventral valve, KCG016; 2, internal mould of ventral valve, KCG017; 3, Keyserlingina sp., 3a–c, internal mould and internal latex cast of ventral valve, KCG019; 4, Parafyttonia kesennumensis Tazawa and Araki; 4a–c, internal mould and internal latex cast of dorsal valve, IGCP98393; 5, Licharewina arakii (Hayasaka); 5a–d, dorsal view of external latex cast, and ventral and dorsal views of internal mould of conjoined shell, KCG004; 6, Dielasma sp.; 6a, b, external latex cast and internal mould of dorsal valve, IGPS96236; 7, Martinia sp., internal mould of ventral valve, NU-B2012; 8–11, Alispiriferella lita (Fredericks); 8a, b, ventral and dorsal views of internal mould of conjoined shell, KCG020; 9a, b, ventral and dorsal views of conjoined shell, KCG021; 10a, b, external latex casts of ventral and dorsal valves, IGPS96219; 11, external latex cast of dorsal valve, IGPS96220. Scale bars represent 1 cm.

    f08_265.jpg

    Family Rigbyellidae Williams, Harper and Grant, 2000
    Genus Paralyttonia Wanner in Wanner and Sieverts, 1935

  • Type species.—Paralyttonia permica Wanner in Wanner and Sieverts, 1935.

  • Paralyttonia kesennumensis Tazawa and Araki, 1984a
    Figure 8.4

  • Paralyttonia kesennumensis Tazawa and Araki, 1984a, p. 122, figs. 2.1, 2.2.

  • Material.—Two specimens from locality AR4, internal moulds of two ventral valves, IGPS98393, 98394.

  • Remarks.—This species was described by Tazawa and Araki (1984a) based on the holotype from the lower part of the Kamiyasse Formation at Takayashiki (about 1.6 km south from locality AR4) and the paratypes from both Takayashiki and Matsukawa (locality AR4). Until now the following four species have been assigned to the genus Paralyttonia: P. permica Wanner in Wanner and Sieverts, 1935, P. transiens Wanner in Wanner and Sieverts, 1935, P. tenax Grant, 1976 and P. kesennumensis Tazawa and Araki, 1984a. The Kitakami species is most like Paralyttonia tenax Grant (1976, p. 168, pl. 44, figs. 4–36; pl. 45, figs. 32–42, text-fig. 15), from the Rat Buri Limestone of Ko Muk, southern Thailand, but it differs from the Thailand species in its smaller size and in having longer and more regular septa.

  • Distribution.—Wordian: northeastern Japan (South Kitakami Belt).

  • Order Spiriferida Waagen, 1883
    Suborder Spiriferidina Waagen, 1883
    Superfamily Martinioidea Waagen, 1883
    Family Martiniidae Waagen, 1883
    Subfamily Martiniinae Waagen, 1883
    Genus Martinia M'Coy, 1844

  • Type species.—Spirifer glaber Sowerby, 1820.

  • Martinia sp.
    Figure 8.7

  • Material.—One specimen from locality AR4, internal mould of a ventral valve, NU-B2012.

  • Remarks.—This specimen is safely assigned to the genus Martinia by its medium-sized (length about 35 mm, width about 38 mm), subcircular-shaped and moderately convex ventral valve and several conspicuous radial vascular markings on the internal surface of the ventral valve. An accurate comparison is difficult for this poorly preserved specimen.

  • Superfamily Spiriferoidea King, 1846
    Family Spiriferellidae Waterhouse, 1968
    Genus Alispiriferella Waterhouse and Waddington, 1982

  • Type species.—Spirifer (Spiriferella) keilhavii var. ordinaria Einor in Licharew and Einor, 1939.

  • Alispiriferella lita (Fredericks, 1924)
    Figures 8.8–8.11

  • Spiriferella saranae mut. lita Fredericks, 1924, p. 36, pl. 1, figs. 16–27, text-fig. 2.

  • Spirifer cf. saranae mut. lita Fredericks. Hayasaka, 1925, p. 98, pl. 5, fig. 14.

  • Spiriferella cf. saranae mut. lita Fredericks. Nonaka, 1944, p. 86, pl. 7, figs. 12–14.

  • Spiriferella keilhavii (von Buch). Yanagida, 1963, p. 72, pl. 9, figs. 4–9; pl. 10, figs. 1–7.

  • Alispirifer aif. laminosus transversa Maxwell. Yanagisawa, 1967, p. 90, pl. 2, fig. 3.

  • Cancellospirifer? maxwelli Campbell. Yanagisawa, 1967, p. 92, pl. 3, fig. 16.

  • Timaniella harkeri Waterhouse. Licharew and Kotlyar, 1978, pl. 18, figs. 2, 3.

  • Spiriferella grandis Kotlyar in Licharew and Kotlyar, 1978, p. 73, pl. 18, figs. 7, 8.

  • Spiriferella lita (Fredericks). Tazawa, 1979, p. 28, pl. 4, figs. 12, 13; pl. 5, figs. 1–4, 6; Tazawa, 2001b, p. 302, figs. 8.19–8.22; Tazawa and Chen, 2006, p. 336, fig. 6.4.

  • Alispiriferella sp. Yanagida, 1996, figs. 2.2, 2.4.

  • Spiriferella cf. lita (Fredericks). Tazawa et al., 2000, p. 12, pl. 1, figs. 16, 17.

  • Alispiriferella ordinaria (Einor). Tazawa, 2001b, p. 302, fig. 8.14.

  • Alispiriferella japonica Tazawa, 2001b, p. 303, figs. 8.15–8.18.

  • Alispiriferella neimongolensis Wang and Zhang, 2003, p. 154, pl. 46, figs. 9–18; pl. 50, figs. 5, 9; Tazawa and Chen, 2006, p. 336, fig. 6.3.

  • Alispiriferella lita (Fredericks). Tazawa and Hasegawa, 2007, p. 9, figs. 5.3–5.11; Tazawa, 2008a, p. 41, figs. 6.6, 6.7; Tazawa, 2008b, p. 55. figs. 9.8–9.14; Tazawa. 2009. p. 74. figs. 5.4–5.9.

  • Material.—Nineteen specimens from localities AR4 and AR5: (1) external and internal moulds of a conjoined shell, IGPS96219: (2) internal mould of a conjoined shell, with external mould of the ventral valve, IGPS96221; (3) internal mould of a conjoined shell, with external mould of the dorsal valve, IGPS96220; (4) internal moulds of two conjoined shells, KCG020, 021; (5) external and internal moulds of three ventral valves, IGPS96222—96224; (6) internal moulds of three ventral valves, IGPS96225—96227; (7) external and internal moulds of ttree dorsal valves, IGPS96228—96230; (8) external mould of a dorsal valve, IGPS96231; and (9) internal moulds of four dorsal valves, IGPS96232—96235.

  • Remarks.—Most of the specimens from Matsukawa were previously described by Tazawa (1979) as Spiriferellalita (Fredericks, 1924). Two newly added specimens, numbered KCG020 and KCG021, are also referred to Alispiriferella lita (Fredericks, 1924), from the middle Pennian (Wordian) of South Primorye, eastern Russia, by their large transverse shells and deep ventral sulcus with smooth V-shaped bottom and strong simple costae on the ventral valve. The type species, Alispiriferella ordinaria (Einor in Licharew and Einor, 1939, p. 140, 217, pl. 23, figs. 6, 7; pl. 24, fig. 1), from the lower Permian of Novaya Zemlya, northern Russia, differs from A. lita by the smaller and less transverse shell with ventral sulcus bearing two prominent sulcal costae. Alispiriferella keilhavii (von Buch), redescribed by Dunbar (1955, p. 199, pl. 25, figs. 1–9; pl. 26, figs. 1–11; pl. 27, figs. 1–44), from the middle Permian of Greenland, differs from the present species in having weakly fasciculate costae on both valves.

  • Distribution.—Wordian—Clianghsingian: northern China (Inner Mongolia), northeastern China (Heilongjiang), eastern Russia (South Primorye), northeastern Japan (South Kitakami Belt), central Japan (Hida Gaien Belt) and southwestern Japan (Akiyoshi Belt and Mizukoshi in central Kyushu).

  • Order Spiriferinida Ivanova, 1972
    Suborder Cyrtinidina Carter and Johnson, 1994
    Superfamily Cyrtinoidea Fredericks, 1911
    Family Cyrtinidae Fredericks, 1911
    Genus Licharewina Kotlyar, Zakharov and Polubotko, 2004

  • Type species.—Licharewina praetriassica Kotlyar, Zakharov and Polubotko, 2004.

  • Licharewina arakii (Hayasaka, 1963)
    Figure 8.5

  • Geyerella arakii Hayasaka, 1963, p. 481, figs. 2, 3.

  • Licharewina arakii (Hayasaka). Tazawa and Araki, 2013, p. 9, figs. 3.1, 3.2.

  • Material.—One specimen from locality AR4, internal mould of a conjoined shell, with external mould of the dorsal valve and interarea of the ventral valve, KCG004.

  • Remarks.—This specimen was first described by Hayasaka (1963) as Geyerella arakii Hayasaka, 1963. Then, Tazawa and Araki (2013) redescribed the specimen as Licharewina arakii (Hayasaka, 1963). This species is characterized by its large size and the highly pyramidal ventral valve. Licharewina josephinae (Gemmellaro, 1899), redescribed by Shen and Clapham (2009, p. 732, pl. 6, figs. 1–15) from the Episkopi Formation (Wuchiapingian) of Hydra Island, Greece, differs from L. arakii in its smaller size and less pyramidal outline. The type species, Licharewina praetriassica Kotlyar, Zakharov and Polubotko (2004, p. 522, figs. 6.13–6.20), from the upper Permian (Changhsingian) of the Caucasus Mountains, is readily distinguished from the present species by its much smaller size.

  • Distribution.—Wordian: northeastern Japan (South Kitakami Belt).

  • Order Terebratulida Waagen, 1883
    Suborder Terebratulidina Waagen, 1883
    Superfamily Dielasmatoidea Schuchert, 1913
    Family Dielasmatidae Schuchert, 1913
    Subfamily Dielasmatinae Schuchert, 1913
    Genus Dielasma King, 1859

  • Type species.—Terebratulites elongatus Schlotheim, 1816.

  • Dielasma sp.
    Figure 8.6

  • Dielasma sp. Tazawa, 1979, p. 30, pl. 5, fig. 5.

  • Material.—One specimen from locality AR5, external and internal moulds of a dorsal valve, IGPS96236.

  • Remarks.—This specimen was described by Tazawa (1979) as Dielasma sp. The Matsukawa species is large in size for the genus (length 29 mm, width 20 mm in the dorsal valve, IGPS96236), and characterized by the presence of a sharp fold on the anterior portion of the dorsal valve. This species is most like Dielasma plica (Kutorga, 1842), redescribed by Diener (1903, p. 44, pl. 2, fig. 2) from the middle Permian (Capitanian) of Chitichun No. 1, southern Tibet, in having a dorsal fold. An accurate comparison, however, is difficult for this poorly preserved specimen.

  • Distribution.—Wordian: northeastern Japan (South Kitakami Belt).

  • Acknowledgements

    We sincerely thank Koji Nakamura (Professor Emeritus at Hokkaido University, Sapporo) and the late Hitoshi Koizumi (Kesennuma, Miyagi Prefecture) for providing part of the brachiopod specimens; Naotomo Kaneko (AIST, Geological Survey of Japan, Tsukuba) and Yousuke Ibaraki (Fossa Magna Museum, Itoigawa) for their help in drawing figures; and Shuzhong Shen (Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing, China) and one anonymous reviewer for their valuable comments and suggestions on the manuscript.

    References

    1.

    Abramov, B. S., 1970: Biostratigraphy of the Carboniferous of Sette-Davana (Southern Verkhoyansk), 176 p. Nauka, Moskva. (in Russian; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    2.

    Albrecht, J., 1924: Paläontologische und stratigraphische Ergebnisse der Forschungsreise nach Westserbien 1918. Denkschriften der Akademie der Wissenschaften, Mathematisch-Naturwissen-schaftliche Klasse, Band 99, p. 289–307. Google Scholar

    3.

    Archbold, N. W., 1982: Classification and evolution of the brachiopod family Rugosochonetidae Muir-Wood, 1962. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria , vol. 94, p. 1–10. Google Scholar

    4.

    Brabb, E. E. and Grant, R. E., 1971: Stratigraphy and paleontology of the revised type section for the Tahkandit Limestone (Permian) in east-central Alaska. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper, no. 703, p. 1–26. Google Scholar

    5.

    Bronn, H. G., 1862: Die Klassen und Ordnungen der Weichthiere (Malacozoa), Band 3, 518 p. C. F. Winter'sche Verlagshandlung, Leipzig and Heidelberg. Google Scholar

    6.

    Carter, J. L. and Johnson, J. G., 1994: Suborder Cyrtinidina. In, Carter, J. L., Johnson, J. G., Gourvennec, R. and Hou, H-F. eds., A revised classification of the spiriferid brachiopods. Annals of the Carnegie Museum, Pittsuburgh, vol. 63, p. 327–374. Google Scholar

    7.

    Chao, Y. T., 1925: On the age of the Taiyuan Series of North China. Bulletin of the Geological Society of China , vol. 4, p. 221–249. Google Scholar

    8.

    Chao, Y. T., 1927: Productidae of China, Part 1. Producti. Palaeontologia Sinica, Series B, vol. 5, fascicle 2, p. 1–244. Google Scholar

    9.

    Chao, Y. T., 1928: Productidae of China, Part 2. Chonetinae, Productinae and Richthofeninae. Palaeontologia Sinica, Series B, vol. 5, fascicle 3, p. 1–103. Google Scholar

    10.

    Chen, Z.-Q., Campi, M. J., Shi, G. R. and Kaiho, K., 2005: Post-extinction brachiopod faunas from the Late Permian Wuchiapingian coal series of South China. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica , vol. 50, p. 343–363. Google Scholar

    11.

    Chen, Z.-Q. and Shi, G. R., 2002: Late Carboniferous to Early Permian brachiopod faunas from the Bachu and Kalpin areas, Tarim Basin, NW China. Alcheringa , vol. 25, p. 293–326. Google Scholar

    12.

    Chen, Z.-Q. and Shi, G. R., 2006: Artinskian—Kungurian (Early Permian) brachiopod faunas from the Tarim Basin, Northwest China, Part 1: Biostratigraphy and systematics of Productida. Palaeontographica, Abteilung A, Band 274, p. 113–177. Google Scholar

    13.

    Chi-Thuan, T. T., 1961: Les brachiopodes permiens du Phnom-Tup (Sisophon-Cambodge). Annales de la Faculté des Sciences, Université de Saigon, 1961, p. 267–308. Google Scholar

    14.

    Chi-Thuan, T. T., 1962: Les brachiopodes permiens de Cam-lo (Province de Quang-Tri). Annales de la Faculté des Sciences, Université de Saigon, 1962, p. 485–498. Google Scholar

    15.

    Colani, M. M., 1919: Sur quelques fossiles ouralo-permiens de Hongay. Bulletin du Service Géologique de l'Indochine , vol. 6, p. 1–27. Google Scholar

    16.

    Cooper, G. A. and Grant, R. E., 1974: Permian brachiopods of West Texas, 2. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, no. 15, p. 233–794. Google Scholar

    17.

    Cooper, G. A. and Grant, R. E., 1975: Permian brachiopods of West Texas, 3. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology, no. 19, p. 795–1921. Google Scholar

    18.

    Diener, C., 1897: The Permocarboniferous fauna of Chitichun, No. 1. Palaeontologia Indica, Series 15, vol. 1, part 3, p. 1–105. Google Scholar

    19.

    Diener, C., 1903: Permian fossils of the central Himalayas. Palaeontologia Indica, Series 15, vol. 1, part 5, p. 1–204. Google Scholar

    20.

    Diener, C., 1915: The Anthracolithic faunae of Kashmir and Spiti. Palaeontologia Indica, New Series, vol. 5, memoir no. 2, p. 1–135. Google Scholar

    21.

    Ding, P. and Qi, W., 1983: Carboniferous and Permian Brachiopoda. In, Xian Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources ed., Palaeontological Atlas of Northwest China; Shaanxi, Gansu and Ninxia Volume, Part 2. Upper Palaeozoic, p. 244–425. Geological Publishing House, Beijing, (in Chinese with English titleGoogle Scholar

    22.

    Dunbar, C. O., 1955: Permian brachiopod faunas of central East Greenland. Meddelelser om Grønland , vol. 110, p. 1–169. Google Scholar

    23.

    Feng, R. and Jiang, Z., 1978: Phylum Brachiopoda. In, Geological and Palaeontological Team of Guizhou ed.. Palaeontological Atlas of Southwest China; Guizhou, Part 2. Carboniferous to Quaternary Volume, p. 231–305. Geological Publishing House, Beijing, (in Chinese; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    24.

    Fredericks, G., 1911: Note on some Upper Paleozoic fossils from the vicinity of Krasnoufimsk. Prilozhenie k Protokolam Zastdanii Obshchestva Estestvoisnytatelei pri Imperattorskom Kazanskom Universitete, Kazan , vol. 42, p. 1–12. (in Russian; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    25.

    Fredericks, G., 1916: The palaeontological notes, 2. On some Palaeozoic Brachiopoda of Eurasia. Trudy Geologicheskago Komiteta, Novaya Seriya, fascicle 156, p. 1–87. (in Russian with English titleGoogle Scholar

    26.

    Fredericks, G., 1924: Upper Paleozoic of the Ussuriland. Materialy po Geologii i Poleznym Iskopaemym Dal'nego Vostoka, no. 28, p. 1–52. (in Russian with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    27.

    Fredericks, G., 1925: Upper Palaeozoic of Oussouriland, 2. Permian Brachiopoda of Cape Kalouzin. Materialy po Geologii i Poleznym Iskopaemym Dal'nego Vostoka, no. 40, p. 3–28. (in Russian with English titleGoogle Scholar

    28.

    Fredericks, G., 1926: Study on the fauna from sandy-argillaceous beds in the Kejim-Terovey River. Izvestiya Geologicheskogo Komiteta , vol. 45, p. 81–91. (in Russian; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    29.

    Gemmellaro, G. G., 1891: Sopra un nuovo genere di Brachiopodi proveniente dei calcari con Fusulina della provincia di Palermo. Società di Scienze Naturali ed Economiche di Palermo, vol. 4, p. 22–23. Google Scholar

    30.

    Gemmellaro, G. G., 1899: La fauna dei calcari con Fusulina della valle del fiume Socio nella Provincia di Palermo, Parte 4 Brachiopoda. Giornale di Scienze Naturali ed Economiche di Palermo , vol. 22, p. 95–214. Google Scholar

    31.

    Girty, G. H., 1929: New Carboniferous invertebrates, 2. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences , vol. 19, p. 135–142 and p. 406–415. Google Scholar

    32.

    Gobbett, D. J., 1963: Carboniferous and Permian brachiopods of Svalbard. Norsk Polarinstitut Skrifter, no. 127, p. 1–201. Google Scholar

    33.

    Grabau, A. W., 1931: The Permian of Mongolia, 665 p. American Museum of Natural History, New York. Google Scholar

    34.

    Grant, R. E., 1976: Permian brachiopods from southern Thailand. Journal of Paleontology, vol. 50, Supplement to no. 3, p. 1–269. Google Scholar

    35.

    Grigorjeva, A. D., Ganelin, V. G. and Kotlyar, G. V., 1977: Family Linoproductidae. In, Sarytcheva, T. G. ed., Late Palaeozoic Productids of Siberia and Arctic Region, p. 126–165. Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instituta Akademii Nauk SSSR, vol. 161, Nauka, Moskva, (in Russian; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    36.

    Gu, F. and Zhu, R., 1985: Lower Permian brachiopods from Lin-Dong, Nei Mongol. Bulletin of the Shenyang Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, no. 12, p. 74–97. (in Chinese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    37.

    Hamlet, B., 1928: Permische Brachiopoden, Lamellibranchiaten und Gastropoden von Timor. Jaarboek van het Mijnwezen in Nederlandsche-Indië , vol. 56, p. 1–115. Google Scholar

    38.

    Harker, P. and Thorsteinsson, R., 1960: Permian rocks and faunas of Grinnel Peninsula, Arctic Archipelago. Geological Survey of Canada, Memoir , 309, p. 1–89. Google Scholar

    39.

    Hayasaka, I., 1917: On the brachiopod genus Lyttonia with several Japanese and Chinese examples. Journal of the Geological Society of Tokyo , vol. 24, p. 43–53. Google Scholar

    40.

    Hayasaka, I., 1922a: Some Permian brachiopods from the Kitakami Mountains. Japanese Journal of Geology and Geography , vol. 1, p. 51–70. Google Scholar

    41.

    Hayasaka, I., 1922b: Paleozoic Brachiopoda from Japan, Korea and China, Part 1. Middle and Southern China. Science Reports of the Tohoku Imperial University, Second Series , vol. 6, p. 1–116. Google Scholar

    42.

    Hayasaka, I., 1925: On some brachiopods from the Lyttonia horizon of the Kitakami Mountains. Japanese Journal of Geology and Geography , vol. 4, p. 89–103. Google Scholar

    43.

    Hayasaka, I., 1960: On the occurrence of Neospirifer fasciger (Keyserling) in Japan, and a note on some associate brachiopods from around Kesen-numa City, northeast Japan. In, Shimane University ed., Collection of Essays in Commemoration of the Tenth Anniversary (1959) of Shimane University (Natural Science), p. 34–57. Shimane University, Matsue. Google Scholar

    44.

    Hayasaka, I., 1963: Some Permian fossils from southern Kitakami 2. Two brachiopod species. Proceedings of the Japan Academy , vol. 39, p. 479–483. Google Scholar

    45.

    Hayasaka, I. and Minato, M., 1956: Some brachiopods from the lower Kanokura Series of the Kitakami Mountains, Japan. Transactions and Proceedings of the Palaeontological Society of Japan, New Series, no. 21, p. 141–147. Google Scholar

    46.

    He, X., Zhu, M., Fan, B., Zhuang, S., Ding, H. and Xue, Q., 1995: The Late Palaeozoic Stratigraphic Classification, Correlation and Biota from Eastern Hill of Taiyuan City, Shanxi Province, 149 p. Jilin University Press, Changchun, (in Chinese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    47.

    Heritsch, F., 1938: Die stratigraphische Stellung des Trogkofelkalkes. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie Geologie and Paläontologie, Band 79, p. 63–185. Google Scholar

    48.

    Huang, T. K., 1932: Late Permian Brachiopoda of southwestern China. Palaeontologia Sinica, Series B, vol. 9, fascicle 1, p. 1–139. Google Scholar

    49.

    Huang, T. K., 1933: Late Permian Brachiopoda of southwestern China, Part 2. Palaeontologia Sinica, Series B, vol. 9, fascicle 2, p. 1–172. Google Scholar

    50.

    Huang, T. K., 1936: On the occurrence of Lyttonia in the Wolfcamp Series of the Glass Mountains of Texas with notes on lyttonids from southwestern China. Bulletin of the Geological Society of China , vol. 15, p. 489–493. Google Scholar

    51.

    Ifanova, V. V., 1972: Permian brachiopods of the Pechora Basin. In, Ifanova, V. V. and Semenova, E. G. eds., Middle Carboniferous and Permian Brachiopods from East and North of the European Part of the USSR, p. 72–161. Nauka, Moskva, (in Russian with English titleGoogle Scholar

    52.

    Ivanova, E. A., 1972: Main features of spiriferid evolution (Brachiopoda). Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal, 1972, no. 3, p. 28–42. (in Russian; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    53.

    Jin, Y., 1963: Urushtenia from the Lower Permian of China. Acta Palaeontologia Sinica , vol. 11, p. 1–31. (in Chinese with English summaryGoogle Scholar

    54.

    Jin, Y., 1985: Permian Brachiopoda and palaeogeography of the Qinghai—Xizang (Tibet) Plateau. Palaeontologia Cathayana, no. 2, p. 19–71. Google Scholar

    55.

    Jin, Y. and Hu, S., 1978: Brachiopods of the Kuhfeng Formation in South Anhui and Nanking Hills. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica , vol. 17, p. 101–127. (in Chinese with English summaryGoogle Scholar

    56.

    Jin, Y., Liao, Z. and Fang, B., 1974: Permian Brachiopoda. In, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Academia Sinica ed., Handbook of Stratigraphy and Palaeontology of Southwest China, p. 308–313. Science Press, Beijing, (in Chinese; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    57.

    Jin, Y., Ye, S., Yu, H. and Sun, D., 1979: Phylum Brachiopoda. In, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology and Qinghai Institute of Geological Sciences eds., Palaeontological Atlas of Northwest China; Oinghai, Part 1, p. 60–217. Geological Publishing House, Beijing, (in Chinese; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    58.

    Kalashnikov, N. V., 1986: Brachiopoda. In, Gorskii, V. P. and Kalmykova, M. A. eds., Atlas of Characteristic Permian Fauna and Flora from the Urals and Russian Platform, p. 29–30 and p. 89–94. Trudy VSEGEI, New Series, vol. 33, Nedra, Leningrad, (in Russian; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    59.

    Kalashnikov, N. V., 1993: Permian Brachiopods of Northern European Russia, 114 p. Nedra, Sankt-Peterburg. (in Russian; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    60.

    Kambe, N. and Shimazu, M., 1961: Explanatory Text of the Geological Map of Japan, Scale 1: 50,000, Kesennuma, 73 p. Geological Survey of Japan, Kawasaki, (in Japanese with English summatyGoogle Scholar

    61.

    Kaschirzew, A. S., 1959: Field Atlas on the Permian Fauna of Northeast SSSR, 85 p. Izdatel'stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR, Moskva, (in Russian; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    62.

    Kato, M., Takeuchi, K., Hendarsyah, A. and Sundari, D., 1999: On the occurrence of the Permian brachiopod genus Leptodus in Timor. Geological Research and Development Centre, Bandung, Palaeontology Series, no. 9, p. 43–51. Google Scholar

    63.

    Kayser, E., 1883: Obercarbonische Fauna von Lo-Ping. In, Richthofen, F. von ed., China, Band 4, Palaeontologischer Theil, p. 160–208. Dietrich Reimer, Berlin. Google Scholar

    64.

    Keidel, H., 1906: Geologische Untersuchungen im südlichen Tian-Schan nebst Beschreibung einer obercarbonischen Brachiopodenfauna aus dem Kukurtuk-Tal. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie Geologie and Paläontologie, Band 22, p. 266–384. Google Scholar

    65.

    Keyserling, A., 1846: Geognostische Beobachtungen, 1. Paläontologische Bemerkungen. In, Krusenstern, P. von and Keyserling, A. eds., Wissenschaftliche Beobachtungen auf einer Reise in das Petschora-Landim Jahre 1843, p. 151–406. Carl Kray, St. Petersburg. Google Scholar

    66.

    Keyserling, A., 1853: Sur les fossiles du calcaire Carbonifére de Sterlitemak (Russie). Bulletin de la Sociéte Géologique de France, 2e Serie , vol. 10, p. 242–254. Google Scholar

    67.

    King, W., 1846: Remarks on certain genera belonging to the class Palliobranchiata. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, London , vol. 18, p. 26–42 and p. 83–94. Google Scholar

    68.

    King, W., 1859: On Gwynia, Dielasma, and Macandrevia, three new genera of Palliobranchiata Mollusca, one of which has been dredged in the Strangford Lough. Dublin University Zoological and Botanical Association, Proceedings , vol. 1, p. 256–262. Google Scholar

    69.

    Klets, A. G., 2005: Upper Paleozoic of Marginal Seas of Angarida, 240 p. Academic Publishing House “Geo”, Novosibirsk, (in Russian with English abstract). Google Scholar

    70.

    Koninck, L. de, 1847: Recherches sur les animaux fossiles. Part 1. Monographie des genres Productus et Chorretes, 246 p. H. Dessain, Liége. Google Scholar

    71.

    Kotlyar, G. V., 1961: Genus Yakovlevia Fredericks. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, vol. 140, p. 459–461. (in Russian: original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    72.

    Kotlyar, G. V., Kossovaya, O. L. and Zhuravlev, A. V., 2007: Late Wordian—Capitanian mixed faunas of East Asia. In, Wong, Th. E. ed., Proceedings of the 15th International Congress on Carboniferous and Permian Stratigraphy. Utrecht, the Neterlands, 10–16 August 2003, p. 537–545. Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam. Google Scholar

    73.

    Kotlyar, G. V., Zakharov, Y. D. and Polubotko, I. V., 2004: Late Changhsingian fauna of the northwestern Caucasus Mountains, Russia. Journal of Paleontology , vol. 78, p. 513–527. Google Scholar

    74.

    Kutorga, S. S., 1842: Beitrag zur Paläontologie Russlands. Russisch-Kaiserliche Mineralogische Gesellschaft zu St. Petersbourg, Verhandlungen 1842, p. 1–34. Google Scholar

    75.

    Lee, L. and Duan, C., 1985: Phylum Brachiopoda. In, Tianjin Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources ed.. Paleontological Atlas of North China, Part 1. Paleozoic Volume, p. 209–260. Geological Publishing House, Beijing, (in Chinese with English title). Google Scholar

    76.

    Lee, L. and Gu, F., 1976: Carboniferous and Permian Brachiopoda. In, Geological Bureau of Nei Mongol and Geological Institute of Northeast China eds., Palaeontological Atlas of Northeast China; Nei Mongol, Part 1. Palaeozoic Volume, p. 228–306. Geological Publishing House, Beijing, (in Chinese; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    77.

    Lee, L., Gu, F. and Su, Y., 1980: Carboniferous and Permian Brachiopoda. In, Shenyang Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources ed., Palaeontological Atlas of Northeast China, Part 1. Palaeozoic Volume, p. 327–428. Geological Publishing House, Beijing, (in Chinese with English titleGoogle Scholar

    78.

    Leman, M. S., 1994: The significance of Upper Permian brachiopods from Merapoh area, northwest Pahang. Geological Society of Malaysia, Bulletin , vol. 35, p. 113–121. Google Scholar

    79.

    Liang, W.-P., 1990: Lengwu Formation of Permian and its Brachiopod Fauna in Zhejiang Province, 522 p. Geological Memoirs, Series 2, Number 10, Geological Publishing House, Beijing, (in Chinese with English summatyGoogle Scholar

    80.

    Liao, Z., 1980: Upper Permian brachiopods from western Guizhou. In, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Academia Sinica ed., Stratigraphy and Palaeontology of the Upper Permian Coalbearing Formation in Western Guizhou and Eastern Yunnan, p. 241–277. Science Press, Beijing, (in Chinese; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    81.

    Liao, Z. and Meng, F., 1986: Late Chanxsingian brachiopods from Huatang of Chenxsingian County, southern Hunan. Memoirs of Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Academia Sinica, no. 22, p. 71–94. (in Chinese with English summaryGoogle Scholar

    82.

    Licharew, B. K., 1928: Über einige seltene und neue Brachiopoden aus dem Unterperm des nördlichen Kaukasus. Paläontologische Zeitschrift, Band 10, p. 258–289. Google Scholar

    83.

    Licharew, B. K., 1932: Fauna of the Permian of Northern Caucasus, Fascicle 2. Brachiopoda Family Lyttoniidae Waagen. Trudy Vsesoyuznogo Geologo-Razvedochnogo Obedineniya NKTP SSSR, vypusk 215, p. 55–111. (in Russian with English summaryGoogle Scholar

    84.

    Licharew, B. K., 1939: Class Brachiopoda. In, Gorsky, I. ed., The Atlas of the Leading Forms of the Fossil Faunas of USSR, Volume 5. The Middle and Upper Carboniferous, p. 79–113. TsNIGRI, Leningrad. (in Russian with English titleGoogle Scholar

    85.

    Licharew, B. K. and Einor, O. L., 1939: Contributions to the knowledge of the Upper Palaeozoic fauna of Novaya Zemlya. Trudy Arkticheskogo Nauchno-Issledovatel'skogo Instituta, vol. 127, p. 1–245. (in Russian with English summaryGoogle Scholar

    86.

    Licharew, B. K. and Kotlyar, G. V., 1978: Permian brachiopods from South Primorye. In, Popeko, L. I. ed., Upper Palaeozoic of Northeastern Asia, p. 63–75. DVNTS, Vladivostok, (in Russian; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    87.

    Liu, F. and Waterhouse, J. B., 1985: Permian strata and brachiopods from Xiujimqinqi region of Neimongol (Inner Mongolia) Autonomous Region, China. Papers, Department of Geology, University of Queensland , vol. 11, p. 1–44. Google Scholar

    88.

    Liu, Z., Tan, Z. and Ding, Y., 1982: Phylum Brachiopoda. In, Geological Bureau of Hunan ed., Palaeontological Atlas of Hunan, p. 172–216. Geological Publishing House, Beijing, (in Chinese with English titleGoogle Scholar

    89.

    Malkowski, K., 1988: Paleoecology of Productacea (Brachiopoda) from the Permian Kapp Starostin Formation, Spitsbergen. Polish Polar Research , vol. 9, p. 3–60. Google Scholar

    90.

    Manankov, I. N., 1998: Late Permian Productida (Brachiopoda) from Southeastern Mongolia., Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal, 1988, no. 5, p. 49–55. (in Russian with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    91.

    Mansuy, H., 1913: Faunes des Calcaires à Productus de l'Indochine, Première série. Mémoires du Service Géologique de l'Indochine , vol. 2. p. 1–133. Google Scholar

    92.

    Mansuy, H., 1914: Faunes des Calcaires à Productus de ľ Indochine, Deuxième série. Mémoires du Service Géologique de l'Indochine , vol. 3. p. 1–59. Google Scholar

    93.

    Mashiko, K., 1934: Discovery of Lyttonia in a limestone exposed at Takauti, Nakayakuno-mura, Amata-gun, Kyoto Prefecture. Japanese Journal of Geology and Geography , vol. 11, p. 181–183. Google Scholar

    94.

    M'Coy, F., 1844: A Synopsis of the Characters of the Carboniferous Limestone Fossils of Ireland, 207 p. Williams & Norgate, London. Google Scholar

    95.

    Minato, M., Hunahashi, M., Watanabe, J. and Kato, M., 1979: Variscan Geohistory of Northern Japan: The Abean Orogeny, 427 p. Tokai University Press, Tokyo. Google Scholar

    96.

    Muir-Wood, H. M., 1955: A History of the Classification of the Phylum Brachiopoda, 124 p. British Museum (Natural History), London. Google Scholar

    97.

    Muir-Wood, H. M., 1962: On the Morphology and Classification of the Brachiopod Suborder Chonetoidea, 132 p. British Museum (Natural History), London. Google Scholar

    98.

    Muir-Wood, H. M. and Cooper, G. A., 1960: Morphology, Classification and Life Habits of the Productoidea (Brachiopoda), 447 p. Geological Society of America Memoir 81, Geological Society of America, New York. Google Scholar

    99.

    Nakamura, K., 1959: Some Lower Permian Sakamotozawa brachiopods. Journal of the Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Series 4, vol. 10, p. 199–207. Google Scholar

    100.

    Nakamura, K., 1979: Additional occurrence of Urushtenoidea (Brachiopoda) from the Permian of Asia. Journal of the Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Series 4 , vol. 19, p. 221–233. Google Scholar

    101.

    Nakamura, K., Kato, M. and Choi, D. R., 1970: On Permundaria, a new genus of the brachiopod family Linoproductidae. Journal of the Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Series 4 , vol. 14, p. 293–299. Google Scholar

    102.

    Nakamura, K. and Tazawa, J., 1990: Faunal provinciality of the Permian brachiopods in Japan. In, Ichikawa, K., Mizutani, S., Hara, I., Hada, S. and Yao, A. eds., Pre-Cretaceous Terrones of Japan, p. 313–320. Publication of IGCP Project No. 224, Nippon Insatsu Shuppan, Osaka. Google Scholar

    103.

    Nakamura, K., Tazawa, J. and Kumon, F., 1992: Permian brachiopods of the Kapp Starostin Formation, West Spitsbergen. In, Nakamura, K. ed., Investigations on the Upper Carboniferous—Upper Permian Succession of West Spitsbergen, 1989–1991, p. 77–95, Hokkaido University Press, Sapporo. Google Scholar

    104.

    Noetling, F., 1904: Über den Bau und die Organisation der Lyttoniidae Waagen. Verhandlungen der Deutschen Zoologischen Gesellschaft, 1904, p. 103–122. Google Scholar

    105.

    Noetling, F., 1905: Untersuchungen über die Familie Lyttoniidae Waag, emend. Noetling. Palaeontographica, Band 51, p. 129–154. Google Scholar

    106.

    Nonaka, J., 1944: Some Permian brachiopods from Inner Mongolia. Japanese Journal of Geology and Geography , vol. 19, p. 83–87. Google Scholar

    107.

    Orbigny, A. d', 1842: Voyages dans l'Amérique Méridionale. Géologie, Paléontologie; Foraminifères. Tome 3, p. 50–56. Pitois-Levrault, Paris. Google Scholar

    108.

    Ozaki, K., 1931: Upper Carboniferous brachiopods from North China. Bulletin of the Shanghai Science Institute , vol. 1, p. 1–205. Google Scholar

    109.

    Pečar, J., 1986: Upper Carboniferous and Permian mesolobid chonetacean brachiopods of Karavanke Mountains (Yugoslavia) and Garnic Alps (Italy). Geologija, vols. 28 and 29, p. 9–53. Google Scholar

    110.

    Ramovs, A., 1965: Rozvoj Mlajšoga Paleozoika v Okolici Ortneka na Dolenjskem, 416 p. Sloveniska Akademija Znanosti in Umetnosti, Ljubljana. Google Scholar

    111.

    Reed, F. R. C., 1944: Brachiopoda and Mollusca from the Productus Limestone of the Salt Range. Palaeontologia Indica, New Series , vol. 23. p. 1–596. Google Scholar

    112.

    Ruzhentsev, V. E. and Sarytcheva, T. G., 1965: Development and change of marine organisms at the Palaeozoic—Mesozoic boundary. Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instituta Akadémii Nauk, SSSR , vol. 108, p. 1–431. (in Russian; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    113.

    Sarytcheva, T. G., 1964: Oldhaminoid brachiopods from the Permian of Trans-Caucasia. Paleontologicheskiy Zhurnal, 1964, no. 3, p. 58–72. (in Russian; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    114.

    Sarytcheva, T. G. and Sokolskaya, A. N., 1959: On the classification of pseudopunctate brachiopods. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR , vol. 125, p. 181–184. (in Russian; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    115.

    Schellwien, E., 1900: Die Fauna der Trogkofelschichten in den karnischen Alpen und den Karawanken, 1 Theil: Die Brachiopoden. Abhandlungen der K.K. Geologischen Reichsanstalt, Band 16, p. 1–122. Google Scholar

    116.

    Schlotheim, F. F., 1816: Beiträge zur Naturgeschichte der Versteinerungen in geognostischer Hinsicht. Denkschriften der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Band 6, p. 13–36. Google Scholar

    117.

    Schréter, Z., 1963: Bükkhegység felsö-permi brachiopodai. Geologica Hungarica, Series Palaeontologica, fascicle 28, p. 1–181. Google Scholar

    118.

    Schuchert, C., 1913: Class 2. Brachiopoda. In, Zittel, K. A. von , ed., Textbook of Palaeontology, Vol. 1,Part 1, 2nd Edition, p. 355–420. Macmillan & Co., London. Google Scholar

    119.

    Scotese, C. R., 2004: A continental drift flipbook. Journal of Geology , vol. 112, p. 729–774. Google Scholar

    120.

    Sergunkova, O. I. and Zhizhilo, O. R., 1975: Brachiopods of the Lower and Upper Carboniferous and the Lower Permian of Southern Fergana. In, Khodanovich, R. I. ed., Biostratigraphy of the Upper Palaeozoic of the Marginal Mountains, Southern Fergana, p. 54–77. Izdatelstvo FAN, Tashkent, (in Russian; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    121.

    Shen, S.-Z., Archbold, N. W., Shi, G. R. and Chen, Z.-Q., 2000: Permian brachiopods from the Selong Xishan section, Xizang (Tibet), China. Part 1 : Stratigraphy, Strophomenida, Productida and Rhynchonellida. Geobios , vol. 33, p. 725–752. Google Scholar

    122.

    Shen, S.-Z. and Clapham, M. E., 2009: Wuchiapingian (Lopingian, Late Permian) brachiopods from the Episkopi Formation of Hydra Island, Greece. Palaeontology , vol. 52, p. 713–743. Google Scholar

    123.

    Shen, S.-Z., He, X.-L. and Zhu, M.-L., 1992: Changhsingian brachiopods from Zhongliang Hill of Chongqing, Sichuan Province. In, Editorial Committee of Stratigraphy and Palaeontology of Oil and Gas Bearing Areas in China ed., The Symposium on Stratigraphy and Palaeontology of Oil and Gas Bearing Areas in China (3), p. 171–218. Petroleum Industry Press, Beijing, (in Chinese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    124.

    Shen, S.-Z. and Shi, G. R., 2009: Latest Guadalupian brachiopods from the Guadalupian/Lopingian boundary GSSP section and Penglaitan in Labin, Guangxi, South China and implications for the timing of the pre-Lopingian crisis. Palaeoworld , vol. 18, p. 152–161. Google Scholar

    125.

    Shen, S.-Z., Shi, G. R. and Fang, Z., 2002: Permian brachiopods from the Baoshan and Simao blocks in western Yunnan, China. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences , vol. 20, p. 665–682. Google Scholar

    126.

    Shen, S.-Z., Sun, D.-L. and Shi, G. R., 2003: A biogeographically mixed late Guadalupian (late Middle Permian) brachiopod fauna from an exotic limestone block at Xiukang in Lhaze County, Tibet. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences , vol. 21, p. 1125–1137. Google Scholar

    127.

    Shen, S.-Z., Xie, J.-F., Zhang, H. and Shi, G. R., 2009: Roadian—Wordian (Guadalupian, Middle Permian) global palaeobiogeography of brachiopods. Global and Planetary Change , vol. 65, p. 166–181. Google Scholar

    128.

    Shen, S.-Z. and Zhang, Y.-C., 2008: Earliest Wuchiapingian (Lopingian, Late Permian) brachiopods in southern Hunan, South China: Implications for the pre-Lopingian crisis and onset of Lopingian recover/radiation. Journal of Paleontology , vol. 82, p. 924–937. Google Scholar

    129.

    Shi, G. R., 2006: The marine Permian of East and Northeast Asia: an overview of biostratigraphy, palaeobiogeography and palaeogeographical implications. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, vol. 26, p. 175–206. Google Scholar

    130.

    Shi, G. R., Archbold, N. W. and Zhan, L.-P., 1995: Distribution and characteristics of mixed (transitional) mid-Permian (Late Artinskian—Ufimian) marine faunas in Asia and their palaeogeographical implications. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology , vol. 114, p. 241–271. Google Scholar

    131.

    Shi, G. R., Chen, Z.-Q. and Tong, J.-N., 2008: New latest Carboniferous brachiopods from the Hexi Corridor Terrane, North China: Faunal migrations and palaeogeographical implications. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria , vol. 120, p. 277–304. Google Scholar

    132.

    Shi, G. R., Shen, S.-Z. and Tazawa, J., 2002: Middle Permian (Guadalupian) brachiopods from the Xiujimqinqi area, Inner Mongolia, northeast China, and their palaeobiogeographical and palaeogeographical significance. Paleontological Research , vol. 6, p. 285–297. Google Scholar

    133.

    Shi, G. R. and Tazawa, J., 2001: Rhynchopora and Blasispirifer (Brachiopoda) from the Middle Permian of the Hida Gaien Belt, central Japan, and their paleobiogeographical significance. Journal of the Geological Society of Japan , vol. 107, p. 755–761. Google Scholar

    134.

    Shi, G. R. and Zhan, L.-P., 1996: A mixed mid-Permian marine fauna from the Yanji area, northeastern China: A paleobiogeographical reinterpretation. Island Arc , vol. 5, p. 386–395. Google Scholar

    135.

    Shiida, I., 1940: On the geology of the vicinity of Kesennuma City, Miyagi Prefecture. Contributions from the Institute of Geology and Paleontology, Tohoku University, no. 33, p. 1–72. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    136.

    Solomina, R. V., 1960: Some Permian brachiopods of Pai-Khoi. Sbornik Statey po Paleontologii i Biostratigrqfii, no. 19, p. 24–73. (in Russian; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    137.

    Solomina, R. V., 1970: Part 2. Descriptions of fauna and flora: Brachiopoda. In, Menner, V. V., Sarytcheva, T. G. and Tschernjak, T. G. eds., Stratigraphy of C arboniferous and Permian of the Northern Verkhoyansk, p. 70–113. Nedra, Leningrad, (in Russian; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    138.

    Sone, M., Leman, M. S. and Shi, G. R., 2001 : Middle Permian brachiopods from central Peninsular Malaysia—faunal affinities between Malaysia and West Cambodia. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences , vol. 19. p. 177–194. Google Scholar

    139.

    Sowerby, J., 1818–1821: The Mineral Conchology of Great Britain, Volume 3, 184 p. W. Ardling, London. Google Scholar

    140.

    Sremac, J., 1986: Middle Permian brachiopods from the Velebit Mts. (Croatia, Yugoslavia). Palaeontologia Jugoslavica , vol. 35, p. 1–43. Google Scholar

    141.

    Stehli, F. G., 1954: Lower Leonardian Brachiopoda of the Sierra Diablo. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History , vol. 105, p. 262–358. Google Scholar

    142.

    Stepanov, D. L., 1937: Permian Brachiopoda of Spitsbergen. Trudy Arkticheskogo Instituta , vol. 76, p. 105–192. (in Russian with English summaryGoogle Scholar

    143.

    Tatarinov, L. P., Luvsandansan, B., Afanasjeva, G. A., Barsbold, R., Morozova, I. P., Novitskaja, L. I., Rasnitsyn, A. P., Reschetov, V. Yu., Posanov, A. Yu., Sysoev, V. A. and Trofimov, B. A., 1991: Permian Invertebrates of Southern Mongolia: The Joint Soviet-Mongolian Paleontological Expedition, 173 p. Nauka, Moskva. (in Russian with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    144.

    Tazawa, J., 1974: Two species of Permundaria from the Kitakami Mountains, northeast Japan. Transactions and Proceedings of the Palaeontological Society of Japan, New Series, no. 94, p. 313–318. Google Scholar

    145.

    Tazawa, J., 1975: Uppermost Permian fossils from the southern Kitakami Mountains, northeast Japan. Journal of the Geological Society of Japan , vol. 81, p. 629–640. Google Scholar

    146.

    Tazawa, J., 1976: The Permian of Kesennuma, Kitakami Mountains: A preliminary report. Earth Science (Chikyu Kagaku) , vol. 30, p. 175–185. Google Scholar

    147.

    Tazawa, J., 1979: Middle Permian brachiopods from Matsukawa, Kesennuma region, southern Kitakami Mountains. Saito Ho-on Kai Museum of Natural History, Research Bulletin, no. 47, p. 23–35. Google Scholar

    148.

    Tazawa, J., 1987: Permian brachiopod faunas of Japan and their palaeobiogeography. Chikyu Monthly (Gekkan Chikyu) , vol. 9, p. 252–255. (in Japanese; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    149.

    Tazawa, J., 1991: Middle Permian brachiopod biogeography of Japan and adjacent regions in East Asia. In, Ishii, K., Liu, X., Ichikawa, K. and Huang, B. eds., Pre-Jurassic Geology of Inner Mongolia, China: Report of China-Japan Cooperative Research Group, 1987–1989, p. 213–230. Matsuya Insatsu, Osaka. Google Scholar

    150.

    Tazawa, J., 1993: Pre-Neogene tectonics of the Japanese Islands from the viewpoint of palaeobiogeography. Journal of the Geological Society of Japan , vol. 99, p. 525–543. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    151.

    Tazawa, J., 1998: Pre-Neogene tectonic divisions and Middle Permian brachiopod faunal provinces of Japan. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria , vol. 110, p. 281–288. Google Scholar

    152.

    Tazawa, J., 1999a: Leptodus and Spiriferella (Permian Brachiopoda) from the Usuginu Conglomerate, southern Kitakami Mountains, northeast Japan. Science Reports of Niigata University, Series E, no. 14, p. 1–13. Google Scholar

    153.

    Tazawa, J., 1999b: Boreal-type brachiopod Yakovlevia from the Middle Permian of Japan. Paleontological Research , vol. 3, p. 88–94. Google Scholar

    154.

    Tazawa, J., 2000: The Palaeozoic of the Hida Gaien, South Kitakami and Kurosegawa belts: Correlation and tectonic history. Memoirs of the Geological Society of Japan, no. 56, p. 39–52. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    155.

    Tazawa, J., 2001a: Middle Permian brachiopod fauna of Japan and South Primorye, Far East Russia: their palaeobiogeographic and tectonic implications. Geosciences Journal , vol. 5, p. 19–26. Google Scholar

    156.

    Tazawa, J., 2001b: Middle Permian brachiopods from the Moribu area, Hida Gaien Belt, central Japan. Paleontological Research , vol. 5, p. 283–310. Google Scholar

    157.

    Tazawa, J., 2002: Late Paleozoic brachiopod faunas of the South Kitakami Belt, northeast Japan, and their paleobiogeographic and tectonic implications. Island Arc , vol. 11, p. 287–301. Google Scholar

    158.

    Tazawa, J., 2003: The palaeobiogeographical significance of brachiopods Yakovlevia, Spiriferella and Leptodus from the middle Permian of the South Kitakami Belt, NE Japan. Earth Science (Chikyu Kagaku), vol. 57, p. 315–318. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    159.

    Tazawa, J., 2004: The strike-slip model: A synthesis on the origin and tectonic evolution of the Japanese Islands. Journal of the Geological Society of Japan , vol. 110, p. 503–517. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    160.

    Tazawa, J., 2007: Middle Permian brachiopod faunas of Japan and their significance for understanding the Paleozoic-Mesozoic tectonics of the Japanese Islands. In, Wong, Th. E. ed., Proceedings of the 15th International Congress on Carboniferous and Permian Stratigraphy, Utrecht, the Netherlands, 10–16 August 2003, p. 565–573. Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Amsterdam. Google Scholar

    161.

    Tazawa, J., 2008a: Brachiopods from the Upper Permian Takakurayama Formation, Abukuma Mountains, northeast Japan. Science Reports of Niigata University (Geology), no. 23, p. 13–53. Google Scholar

    162.

    Tazawa, J., 2008b: Permian brachiopods from the Mizukoshi Formation, central Kyushu, SW Japan: Systematics, palaeobiogeography and tectonic implications. Paleontological Research , vol. 12, p. 37–61. Google Scholar

    163.

    Tazawa, J., 2009: Brachiopods from the Upper Permian Tsunemori Formation of the Akiyoshi area, southwest Japan, and their tectonic implications. Paleontological Research , vol. 13, p. 65–78. Google Scholar

    164.

    Tazawa, J., 2015: Systematics and palaeobiogeography of Permian brachiopods from Pliocene conglomerate of Hitachi, central Japan. Science Reports of Niigata University (Geology), no. 30, p. 57–88. Google Scholar

    165.

    Tazawa, J. and Araki, H., 1984a: Paralyttonia (Oldhamina, Brachiopoda) from the Permian of Northeast Japan. Journal of the Geological Society of Japan , vol. 90, p. 121–123. Google Scholar

    166.

    Tazawa, J. and Araki, H., 1984b: A new species of Richthofenia (Brachiopoda) from the Permian of Northeast Japan. Saito Ho-on Kai Museum Natural History, Research Bulletin, no. 25, p. 1–6. Google Scholar

    167.

    Tazawa, J. and Araki, H., 1999: Scacchinella (Permian Brachiopoda) from the southern Kitakami Mountains, northeast Japan. Earth Science (Chikyu Kagaku), vol. 53, p. 452–455. Google Scholar

    168.

    Tazawa, J. and Araki, H., 2013: Four brachiopod species newly described from the Middle Permian of Kesennuma, South Kitakami Belt, northeast Japan. Science Reports of Niigata University (Geology), no. 28, p. 1–14. Google Scholar

    169.

    Tazawa, J. and Chen, Z.-Q., 2006: Middle Permian brachiopods from the Tumenling Formation in the Wuchang area, southern Heilongjiang, NE China, and their palaeobiogeographical implications. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences , vol. 26, p. 327–338. Google Scholar

    170.

    Tazawa, J. and Hasegawa, S., 2007: Anidanthus, Gypospirifer and Alispiriferella (Brachiopoda) from the Upper Permian Mizukoshi Formation, central Kyushu, SW Japan. Science Reports of Niigata University (Geology), no. 22, p. 1–14. Google Scholar

    171.

    Tazawa, J. and Ibaraki, Y., 2001: Middle Permian brachiopods from Setamai, the type locality of the Kanokura Formation, southern Kitakami Mountains, northeast Japan. Science Reports of Niigata University, Series E, no. 16, p. 1–33. Google Scholar

    172.

    Tazawa, J., Kikuchi, Y., Nikaido, A., Adachi, S. and Okumura, Y., 2014: Permian brachiopods from boulders in the Pliocene basal conglomerate of Hitachi, central Japan, and their tectonic implications. Journal of the Geological Society of Japan , vol. 120, p. 377–391. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    173.

    Tazawa, J. and Matsumoto, T., 1998: Middle Permian brachiopods from the Oguradani Formation, Ise district, Hida Gaien Belt, central Japan. Science Reports of Niigata University, Series E, no. 13, p. 1–19. Google Scholar

    174.

    Tazawa, J. and Nakamura, K., 2015: Early Permian (Kungurian) brachiopods from Nakadaira, South Kitakami Belt, northeastern Japan. Paleontological Research , vol. 19, p. 156–177. Google Scholar

    175.

    Tazawa, J., Ono, T. and Hori, M., 1998: Two Permian lyttoniid brachiopods from Akasaka, central Japan. Paleontological Research , vol. 2, p. 239–245. Google Scholar

    176.

    Tazawa, J., Takizawa, F. and Kamada, K., 2000: A Middle Permian Boreal—Tethyan mixed brachiopod fauna from Yakejima, southern Kitakami Mountains, NE Japan. Science Reports of Niigata University, Series E, no. 15, p. 1–21. Google Scholar

    177.

    Tazawa, J., Yoshida, K. and Machiyama, H., 1999: Permian brachiopods from a sandstone block in the Usuginu Conglomerate, southern Kitakami Mountains, northeast Japan and their geological significance. Earth Science (Chikyu Kagaku) , vol. 53, p. 159–163. (in Japanese with English title). Google Scholar

    178.

    Termier, H. and Termier, G., 1960: Contribution à la classification des Brachiopodes: le lophophore des Collolophides nov. ord., Appendice. Les Oldhaminidés du Cambodge. Société Géologique de France, Bulletin, Série 7 , vol. 1, p. 233–243. Google Scholar

    179.

    Tong, Z., 1978: Phylum Brachiopoda: Carboniferous and Permian. In, Geological Institute of Southwest China ed., Palaeontological Atlas of Southwest China: Sichuan, Part 2. Carboniferous to Mesozoic, p. 210–267. Geological Publishing House, Beijing, (in Chinese: original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    180.

    Toula, F., 1875: Permo-Carbon-Fossilien von der Westküste von Spitzbergen. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie Geologie and Paläontologie, 1875, p. 225–264. Google Scholar

    181.

    Tschemyschew, Th., 1889: General geologic map of Russia, Sheet 139. Central Urals and the Western slope. Trudy Geologicheskago Komiteta , vol. 3, p. 1–393. (in Russian: original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    182.

    Tschemyschew, Th., 1902: Upper Carboniferous brachiopods of the Urals and Timan. Trudy Geologicheskago Komiteta , vol. 16, p. 1–749. (in Russian: original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    183.

    Ustritsky, V. I. and Tschernjak, G. E., 1963: Biostratigraphy and brachiopods of the Upper Palaeozoic of Taimyr. Trudy NIIGA , vol. 134, p. 1–139. (in Russian: original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    184.

    Volgin, V. I., 1960: Brachiopods of the Upper Carboniferous and Lower Permian of Southern Fergana, 202 p. Izdatel'stvo Leningradskogo Universiteta, Leningrad, (in Russian: original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    185.

    Waagen, W., 1883–1884: Salt Range fossils, 1. Productus-Limestone fossils: Brachiopoda. Palaeontologia Indica, Series 13, vol. 1, p. 391–546 (1883) and p. 547–728 (1884). Google Scholar

    186.

    Wakimizu, T., 1892: Discovery of a Paleozoic fossil locality in the Kitakami Mountains. Journal of Geography (Chigaku Zasshi), vol. 4, p. 384–385. (in Japanese: original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    187.

    Wang, C., 1995: Brachiopod fauna from Kangkelin Formation in Akesu, Xinjiang Autonomous Region. Journal of Changchun University of Earth Sciences , vol. 25, p. 15–23. (in Chinese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    188.

    Wang, C. and Yang, S., 1998: Late Carboniferous-Early Permian Brachiopods of Central Xinjiang, and Their Biostratigraphical Studies, 156 p. Geological Publishing House, Beijing, (in Chinese: original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    189.

    Wang, C. and Zhang, S., 2003: Zhesi Brachiopod Fauna, 210 p. Geological Publishing House, Beijing, (in Chinese: original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    190.

    Wang, G., Liu, Q., Jin, Y., Hu, S., Liang, W. and Liao, Z., 1982: Phylum Brachiopoda. In, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources ed., Palaeontological Atlas of East China, Part 2. Late Palaeozoic Volume, p. 186–256. Geological Publishing House, Beijing, (in Chinese with English titleGoogle Scholar

    191.

    Wang, Y., Jin, Y. and Fang, D., 1964: Brachiopod Fossils of China, Part 1, 354 p. Science Press, Beijing, (in Chinese: original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    192.

    Wanner, J. and Sieverts, H., 1935: Zur Kenntnis der permischen Brachiopoden von Timor. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie und Paläontologie, Abteilung B, Band 74, p. 201–281. Google Scholar

    193.

    Waterhouse, J. B., 1968: The classification and description of Permian Spiriferida (Brachiopoda) from New Zealand. Palaeontographica, Abteilung A, Band 129, p. 1–94. Google Scholar

    194.

    Waterhouse, J. B., 1975: New Permian and Triassic brachiopod taxa. University of Queensland Papers, Department of Geology , vol. 7, p. 1–23. Google Scholar

    195.

    Waterhouse, J. B. and Briggs, D. J. C., 1986: Late Palaeozoic Scyphozoa and Brachiopoda (Inarticulata, Strophomenida, Productida and Rhynchonellida) from the southeast Bowen Basin, Australia. Palaeontographica, Abteilung A, Band 193, p. 1–76. Google Scholar

    196.

    Waterhouse, J. B., Briggs, D. J. C. and Parfrey, S. M., 1983: Major faunal assemblages in the Early Permian Tiverton Formation near Homevale Homestead, northern Bowen Basin, Queensland. In, Foster, C. ed., Permian Geology of Queensland, p. 121–138. Geological Society of Australia, Queensland Division, Brisbane. Google Scholar

    197.

    Waterhouse, J. B. and Waddington, J., 1982: Systematic descriptions, paleoecology and correlations of the Late Paleozoic Subfamily Spiriferellinae (Brachiopoda) from the Yukon Territory and the Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Geological Survey of Canada, Bulletin 289, p. 1–73. Google Scholar

    198.

    Williams, A., Harper, D. A. T. and Grant, R. E., 2000: Lyttoniidina. In, Kaesler, R. L. ed., Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part H. Brachiopoda Revised, Volume 3: Linguliformea, Craniiformea, and Rhynchonelliformea (Part), p. 619–642. Geological Society of America, Boulder and University of Kansas, Lawrence. Google Scholar

    199.

    Yabe, H., 1900: The brachiopod Lyttonia from Rikuzen Province. Journal of the Geological Society of Tokyo , vol. 7, p. 1–4. Google Scholar

    200.

    Yanagida, J., 1963: Brachiopods from the Upper Permian Mizukoshi Formation, central Kyushu. Memoirs of the Faculty of Science, Kyushu University, Series D , vol. 14, p. 69–78. Google Scholar

    201.

    Yanagida, J., 1996: Permian brachiopods from the Tsunemori Formation, SW Japan, and their palaeobiogeographic implication. In, Copper, P. and Jin, J. eds., Brachiopods, p. 313–315. Proceedings of the Third International Brachiopod Congress, Sudbury/Ontario/ Canada/2–5 September 1995, A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam. Google Scholar

    202.

    Yanagida, J., Imamura, S. and Kawai, M., 1993: Reexamination of the brachiopod fauna from the Permian Karita Formation, southwest Japan. Memoirs of the Faculty of Science, Kyushu University, Series D , vol. 28, p. 1–21. Google Scholar

    203.

    Yanagisawa, I., 1967: Geology and paleontology of the Takakurayama-Yaguki area, Yotsukura-cho, Fukushima Prefecture. Science Reports of the Tohoku University, Second Series , vol. 39, p. 63–112. Google Scholar

    204.

    Yang, D., 1984: Systematic descriptions of palaeontology: Brachiopoda. In, Yichang Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources ed., Biostratigraphy of the Yangtze Area, (3) Late Palaeozoic Era, p. 203–239, p. 330–333 and p. 387–396. Geological Publishing House, Beijing, (in Chinese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    205.

    Yang, D., Ni, S., Chang, M. and Zhao, R., 1977: Phylum Brachiopoda. In, Geological Institute of Hubei et al. eds., Palaeontological Atlas of South-Central China, Part 2. Late Palaeozoic Volume, p. 303–470. Geological Publishing House, Beijing, (in Chinese: original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    206.

    Yang, S. and Gao, J., 1996: Systematic descriptions; Brachiopods. In, Zeng, X., Zhu, W., He, X., Teng, F. et al. eds., Permo—Carboniferous Biostratigraphy and Sedimentary Environment of West Qinling, p. 211–218 and p. 271–274. Geological Publishing House, Beijing, (in Chinese with English summaryGoogle Scholar

    207.

    Yang, Z., Ting (Ding), P., Yin, H., Zhang, S. and Fang, J., 1962: Carboniferous, Permian and Triassic brachiopod faunas from the Chilianshan region. In, Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Geological Institute, Academia Sinica and Beijing University of Geology eds., Monograph on Geology of the Chilianshan Mountains, Volume 4, Part 4, p. 1–129. Science Press, Beijing, (in Chinese: original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    208.

    Zavodowsky, V. M. and Stepanov, D. L., 1970: Class Articulata. In, Kulikov, M. V. ed., Field Atlas of Permian Fauna and Flora of Northeast SSSR, p. 72–182. Magadanskoye Knizhnoye Izdatel'stvo, Magadan, (in Russian: original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    209.

    Zeng, Y., He, X. and Zhu, M., 1995: Permian Brachiopods and Community Succession in the Huayin Mountains, Sichuan, 187 p. China University of Mining and Technology Press, Xuzhou. (in Chinese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    210.

    Zhan, L.-P., 1979: Descriptions of fossils; (2) Brachiopoda. In, Hou, H.-F., Zhan, L.-P., Chen, B.-W. et al. eds., The Coal-bearing Strata and Fossils of Late Permian from Guangtung, p. 61–100. Geological Publishing House, Beijing, (in Chinese with English titleGoogle Scholar

    211.

    Zhan, L.-P. and Wu, S.-Z., 1987: Brachiopoda. In, Institute of Geology, Xinjiang Geological Bureau and Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences eds., The Carboniferous and Permian Stratigraphy and Biota in Kalpin Region, Xinjiang, p. 201–232. Ocean Press, Beijing, (in Chinese; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    212.

    Zhang, C., Zhang, F., Zhang, Z. and Wang, Z., 1983: Phylum Brachiopoda. In, Regional Geological Surveying Team of Xinjiang, Institute of Geoscience of Xinjiang, and Geological Surveying Group of Petroleum Bureau of Xinjiang eds., Palaeontological Atlas of Northwest China; Xinjiang Autonomous Region, Part 2. Late Palaeozoic, p. 262–386. Geological Publishing House, Beijing, (in Chinese; original title translatedGoogle Scholar

    213.

    Zhang, Y., 1990: Early Permian brachiopod fauna from Ekenalsileng region of Badain Jaran desert south margin, Nei Mongol. Bulletin of the Xian Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, no. 28, p. 57–64. (in Chinese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    214.

    Zhang, Y. and ching (Jin), Y., 1961: An Upper Permian brachiopod fauna from Jiangxian, Anhui Province. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, vol. 9, p. 401–417. (in Chinese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    215.

    Zhu, T., 1990: The Permian Coal-bearing Strata and Palaeobiocoenosis of Fujian, 127 p. Geological Publishing House, Beijing, (in Chinese with English abstractGoogle Scholar
    © by the Palaeontological Society of Japan
    Jun-Ichi Tazawa and Hideo Araki "Middle Permian (Wordian) Mixed Boreal—Tethyan Brachiopod Fauna from Matsukawa, South Kitakami Belt, Japan," Paleontological Research 21(3), 265-287, (1 July 2017). https://doi.org/10.2517/2016PR029
    Received: 2 May 2016; Accepted: 1 October 2016; Published: 1 July 2017
    KEYWORDS
    Brachiopoda
    Matsukawa
    Middle Permian
    mixed Boreal—Tethyan fauna
    South Kitakami Belt
    Back to Top