Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 July 2018 A Turonian Polycotylid Plesiosaur (Reptilia: Sauropterygia) from Obira Town, Hokkaido, and Its Biostratigraphic and Paleoecological Significance
Tamaki Sato, Tomoya Hanai, Shoji Hayashi, Tomohiro Nishimura
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The Polycotylidae are short-necked plesiosaurs known from the Cretaceous in various parts of the world, but only a few occurrences have been documented in Japan, where elasmosaurid remains are much more common. An indeterminate polycotylid specimen from the Upper Cretaceous in Obira Town, Hokkaido, is described. Characteristics of the vertebrae and clavicular arch support its taxonomic affinity. The Turonian occurrence of the specimen indicates the continuous presence of the Polycotylidae across the Cenomanian-Turonian boundary in the northwestern Pacific. Macroscopic osteological features of the vertebrae and clavicular arch indicate an advanced stage of ossification, and there are histological characteristics suggesting slowed growth. The osteoporotic-like condition implies a high degree of aquatic adaption.

Introduction

The Yezo Group in Hokkaido and Sakhalin is so far the only place in the northern Pacific where a continuous stratigraphic sequence of mid to uppermost Cretaceous is available with a reasonable number of reptilian fossils and good stratigraphic controls (Sato et al., 2012; Takashima et al., 2004; Konishi et al., 2016). Basic taxonomie studies of the Yezo fauna are therefore crucial to understand the temporal and geographic distributions of various Cretaceous marine reptiles. Remains of the Plesiosauria (Reptilia: Sauropterygia) are fairly common in the Japanese Upper Cretaceous (Sato et al., 2012), and the long-necked Elasmosauridae numerically dominate the record, represented by several incomplete but articulated skeletons (e.g. Nakaya, 1989; Ogawa and Nakaya, 1998; Sato et al., 2006). In contrast, non-elasmosaurid specimens, such as those of the Polycotylidae and Pliosauroidea, are much fewer in number and represented by more fragmentary remains. However, reports of their occurrences have doubled in the last decade or so (e.g. Sato et al., 2012), suggesting their taxonomic and/or morphological diversity is higher than perceived.

In this study, we describe a polycotylid specimen from the Turonian of the Yezo Group in Hokkaido. This specimen is important because 1) it includes the first reasonably complete clavicular arch of the Polycotylidae from Japan, 2) its Turonian occurrence demonstrates the survival of Polycotylidae across the Cenomanian-Turonian boundary in the northwest Pacific, and 3) it provides the first histological data of definite Polycotylidae using CT-scanning and thin-sectioning.

Much of the Yezo plesiosaurian specimens were collected as isolated floats in a riverbed. Even the preserved bones tend to be incomplete due to their large size and weathering of the float, and their stratigraphic origins are often given as a range of the horizons exposed in the area. For example, Echizenya and Minoura (2005) reported the occurrence of two damaged vertebrae and the anterior tip of the interclavicle from the upper Cenomanian to lower Turonian of the Yezo Group, but the fragmentary nature of the specimen and lack of co-occurring age-indicative fossils did not allow in-depth investigation on the morphology and stratigraphic significance of their specimen.

Figure 1.

Locality map and stratigraphy of HMG-357. A, map of Hokkaido with a star indicating the fossil locality and grey areas the distribution of the Yezo Group. B, details of the now-submerged locality area. Mm—o refers to local stratigraphic units, Ng to Neogene, Pg to Paleogene. C, local stratigraphy with a star indicating the HMG-357 horizon. Geological map based on Tsushima et al. (1958). Timescale follows Cohen et al. (2013).

f01_265.jpg

Previous studies on plesiosaurian bone histology are limited in their taxonomic, geographic, and stratigraphic coverage. Indeterminate elasmosaurids of southern high latitudes in the latest Cretaceous (Campanian—Maastrichtian) are the most common material (e.g. Wiffen et al., 1995; Fostowicz-Frelik and Gaździcki, 2001; Talevi and Fernández, 2014), whereas Cruickshank et al. (1996) and Street and O'Keefe (2010) studied a pliosaurid and a cryptoclidid of the Jurassic, respectively. To our knowledge, there are no previous studies on the histology of definite polycotylid specimens. Wiffen et al. (1995) examined skeletal histological features of two “pliosaurid” vertebrae from the Campanian—Maastrichtian of New Zealand. The classification back then was the one proposed by Brown (1981) in which the Polycotylidae was not recognized as a discrete taxon, and it is quite possible that Wiffen's “pliosaurid” specimens may actually represent or include polycotylid material, but it is difficult to prove it.

Material and methods

The specimen described here, HMG-357 of Hobetsu Museum in Mukawa Town, Hokkaido, came from the Upper Cretaceous Yezo Group in Obira Town, Hokkaido; see Figure 1 and “Remarks on stratigraphy” in “Systematic paleontology” for details on its geology. Sato and Nishimura (2012) and Sato et al. (2012) briefly reported/mentioned its occurrence.

Two anteromost dorsal ribs, #7 and #15 (see “Systematic paleontology” below) were used for our histological study. CT scanning was performed using Tesco Microfocus CT TXS320-ACTIS (0.2 mm resolution, 260 kV, 200 µA) at the National Museum of Nature and Science, Tokyo, Japan, and image segmentation and visualization were performed using VG Studio Max 2.0.5 (Volume Graphics GmBH, Heidelberg, Germany). The thin sectioning procedure generally follows Chinsamy and Raath (1992). The rib #15 was sectioned at six points, and prepared sections were numbered #15-I to #15-VI from the proximal to distal end. Thin sections were observed in transmitted light using a Leica Z6 APO microscope at Tokyo Gakugei University and Leica M125 microscope at the University of Tokyo, and photographed using Leica DFC290 HD digital sight camera and Canon EOS Kiss X6i digital single-lens camera, respectively. Because of the large size of the samples, multiple photographs were integrated into a single image showing the entire section. The polarizing microscope Olympus BX41 at the University of Tokyo was also used in observation of thin sections, using the Canon EOS Kiss X6i digital camera. Original CT images were processed with Photoshop Creative Cloud software to emphasize the contrast.

Nomenclature and definitions of technical terms in bone histology are based on Francillon-Vieillot et al. (1990).

Systematic paleontology

Sauropterygia Owen, 1860
Plesiosauria de Blainville, 1835
Polycotylidae Cope, 1869
Polycotylidae gen. et sp. indet.

  • Referred specimen.—HMG-357, a partial skeleton consisting of five articulated vertebrae at the base of the neck, eight ribs, clavicular arch, and a scapular dorsal blade.

  • Locality.—Collected as a float in the Obirashibe River in the Lake Obirashibe area, Obira Town, Hokkaido, Japan.

  • Horizon.—Estimated to be in an upper part of the Saku Formation (Mm—o units) of the Yezo Group, upper middle to lower upper Turonian.

  • Remarks on stratigraphy.—HMG-357 was collected in 1986 as a float in the Obirashibe River by Ken-ichi Chiyokawa and donated to the Hobetsu Museum. A reservoir (Lake Obirashibe) was constructed in 1992 and the locality has been submerged.

  • The nodule containing HMG-357 was prepared sometime before our research, but the remaining matrix consists of bioturbated mudstone and includes very fine sands and abundant wood particles. Judging from matrix, the nodule came from the Mm—o stratigraphic units, i.e., the uppermost geological unit of the Saku Formation. The Mm-o units correlates to the upper part of the Inoceramus hobetsensis Zone and the lower part of the I. teshioensis Zone (Tanabe et al., 1977; Funaki and Hirano, 2004). In addition, the ammonoid Scalarites sp. co-occurred in the nodule; this genus is known from the Turanian to the Coniacian in the Yezo Group (Matsumoto, 1977; Toshimitsu and Hirano, 2000). Based on this evidence, the stratigraphic origin of the plesiosaur specimen is confidently estimated to be in an upper part of the Saku Formation (Mm—o units) of the Yezo Group, representing the upper middle Turanian to the lower upper Turanian.

  • Osteological description

    HMG-357 includes five vertebrae, eight ribs, a part of the left scapula and a clavicular arch. Judging from the anatomical positions and size of individual elements, it is safely assumed that this specimen originated from the pectoral region of a single individual. The neurocentral suture is completely closed in all vertebrae, indicating this individual was an “adult” or “old adult” sensu Brown (1981; also see “Discussion”). An Arabic numeral is painted on each element (but it does not match the anatomical order), and in the following description this number is employed to distinguish ribs, e.g. #15 for the rib with the painted number of “HMG 357-15”.

    The articulated vertebrae (Figure 2A, B) represent the transition from the cervical to dorsal vertebrae, and the rib facets gradually shift from the centrum in cervicais to the tip of the transverse process in dorsals. The centra are amphicoelous (Figure 2C, D), and wider than tall and taller than long (Table 1), and there is no ventral notch on the ventral edge of the intervertebral facet. The foramina subcentralia are located in the shallow depressions on the ventral surface separated by a longitudinal ridge (Figure 2E). The neural spine slightly narrows dorsally in lateral view, and lacks the thickening at the anterior and posterior corners seen in the “pectoral” vertebrae of elasmosaurids (e.g. Sato et al., 2006).

    All of the eight ribs (#7, 8, 10 to 15: Figure 3) are more or less damaged, but most of them can be matched with the corresponding vertebrae with reasonable confidence based on the fit of the head and rib facet, as well as the symmetry. We consider #11 as the anteromost right rib in the preserved series because of the shortness and the presence of the anterior process. #10 is slightly longer than #11, and likely represents the next right rib, because the partly damaged distal end retains the base of the anterior process. The articular facet is elongate and seems to match the facet on the second anteromost vertebra, although it may have been compressed slightly. #12 is longer than #10, and has an elongate articular facet which corresponds to the rib facets of the 3rd anterior vertebra; it is paired with #14 based on the characteristics of the constriction near the head, as well as the thickness of the shaft.

    Table 1.

    Vertebral measurements of HMG-357. Length (L), height (H), and width (W) of the centrum in mm. Subscripts “d” and “e” refer to distorted centrum and estimated length, respectively.

    t01_265.gif

    Figure 2.

    Photograph (A) and interpretation (B) of the left lateral view of the five vertebrae of HMG-357 in articulation, and anterior (C), posterior (D) and ventral (E) views of the second vertebra. Hatching indicates damaged surface, and the open-circle-and-dot pattern marks matrix/adhesive in this and following figures. Abbreviations: rf, rib facet; tp, transverse process.

    f02_265.jpg

    #15 and #7 are used for the histological study and described in detail. #7 is the best preserved rib in this specimen, although the distal end and the rim of the articular facet are slightly damaged. It is about 13 cm long from the rib facet to the broken distal end, and the longitudinal diameter of the damaged proximal end is about 25 mm. The shaft is gently curved, and the articulation facet is deeply concave to fit the convex facet on the transverse process, and there are ridges and gentle grooves on the surface near the head. #15 is heavily abraded and missing the rim of the head, the dorsal surface and the distal part, but paired with #7 based on the similarity of the ridge and groove near the ventral edge, as well as the concavity and inferred size of the articular facet. It is about 75 mm long, and the longitudinal diameter of the damaged proximal end is about 20 mm. #8 and #13 represent the posteromost pair belonging to the posteromost vertebra in the preserved series. The rib head is more massive than #7, the articular facet is deeply concave with a well denned rim, and the shaft is thicker.

    Figure 3.

    Photographs and interpretation of the ribs of HMG-357. A, B, dorsal (?) view of the 1st right rib (#11); C, D, dorso-posterior view of the 2nd right (?) rib (#10); E, F, posterior (?) view of the 3rd left rib (#12); G–L, proximal (G, H), anterior (I, J), posterior (K, L) views of the 4th left rib (#7); M–P, posterodorsal (M, N) and anterior (O, P) views of the 4th right rib (#15); Q, R, posterior view of the 5th left rib (#13).

    f03_265.jpg

    Figure 4.

    Photograph and interpretation of the clavicular arch of HMG-357 m anterior (A, D), ventral (B, E), and dorsal or visceral (C, F) views. Abbreviations: cl, clavicle; frag, fragmentary; icf, interclavicular foramen; icl, interclavicle; 1, left; r, right.

    f04_265.jpg

    In plesiosaurs, the transition from the cervical to dorsal vertebrae is gradual and they are conventionally distinguished based on the location of the rib facet relative to the neurocentral suture (e.g. Welles, 1943; Carpenter, 1999). The neurocentral suture is completely closed in HMG-357 and cannot be traced in the vertebra bearing #7 and #15 ribs, but the rib facet on the short transverse process is convex without any trace of suture, suggesting it is a dorsal vertebra. In addition, the damaged shaft of #7 indicates that it was much longer than more anterior ribs. Therefore, we interpret #7 and #15 as the first dorsal ribs of this plesiosaur.

    The preserved portion of the clavicular arch is missing much of the original edge of the bone (Figure 4). It is fairly thick in the anteromedial portion near the large interclavicular foramen, but the element thins posterolaterally, and it is only 1 mm thick or so at the broken edge of the interclavicle and clavicles. The three bones are fused, but the suture is partially traceable. There are longitudinal sharp ridges on the interclavicle lateral to the interclavicular foramen. This portion of the arch is slightly asymmetrical.

    Judging from the thickness of the anterior edge and concavity on the medial side, the preserved dorsal blade came from the left scapula (Figure 5). The distal end of the blade is damaged but indicates that the tip of the blade widens and did not simply taper.

    Microanatomical and histological descriptions

    CT images of HMG-357 rib # 7.—The CT value (X-ray transmissivity) of the matrix and bone did not differ considerably, and the contrast of the image was enhanced in Figure 6. The comparison with the structures observed in thin sections supports our interpretation of these images. The brightness of the bone is reversed in some places within the same image, i.e., the trabeculae appear brighter than the matrix in the anterior half of the rib but darker in the posterior half, likely reflecting the subtle difference in the relative transmissivity between the matrix and bone. The bright spots in spongiosa likely represent pyrite crystals (see “microscopic description” below).

    The inner rib structure exhibits osteoporotic-like condition at the two sectioned points (i.e., rib head and midshaft). The medullary cavity is surrounded by extensive spongiosa, and a thin layer of compact cortical bone forms the solid surface.

    Microscopic description.—The longitudinal section of a rib head (HMG-357 #15-1, Figure 7A) displays loose spongiosa, consisting of thin trabeculae (about 0.2 mm) oriented longitudinally to the articular facet. The outermost cortex at the ventral side of the rib exhibits nearly avascular primary bone with few secondary osteons. There is a mass of tissue at the ventral comer of the articular facet, which appears homogeneous and contains numerous fiber bundles, possibly related with tendon insertions (Figure 7D; Haines and Mohuiddin, 1968; Petermann and Sander, 2013). Bands of alternating light and dark tissue are present in the fiber bundles showing possible tempo and mode of calcification of existing soft tissue (see also Main et al., 2005). In the medullary region, the trabecular tissue is mostly secondary remodeled.

    Figure 5.

    Photograph and interpretation of the dorsal blade of the right (?) scapula of HMG-357 in lateral (A, C) and medial (B, D) views.

    f05_265.jpg

    Figure 6.

    CT images of the proximal (A) and midshaft (B) portions of the left (?) anteromost dorsal rib (#7) of HMG-357.

    f06_265.jpg

    In the shaft sections, there is a large open medullary cavity surrounded by spongiosa with numerous erosion lacunae throughout the preserved portion (Figure 7B, C). Most parts of the cortex are heavily remodeled; especially, the ventral region is completely remodeled by dense Haversian tissue (Figure 7E).

    A thin layer of primary bone tissue consisting of parallel-fibered bone is present in the outermost cortex of the posterior side (Figure 7G). A part of the peripheral bone tissue comprises mostly avascular tissue including possible lines of arrested growth (LAG) (Figure 7I), which resembles an external fundamental system (EFS) (e.g. Sander et al., 2006). The outermost edge of the ventral side includes numerous fiber bundles running toward the periphery between secondary osteons (Figure 7D). There are numerous erosion cavities in the deeper cortex; they are irregularly shaped and larger in the deeper area. Howship's lacunae are occasionally present in the wall of the erosion cavity, indicating active resorption by osteoclasts (Figure 7F). The trabeculae are about 0.1–0.3 mm thick and form a coarse network and are composed of secondary lamellar bone tissue (Figure 7H).

    The marrow spaces of HMG-357-# 15 are filled with minerals. Dark irregular spots are observed on the trabecular surfaces and form thick black layers in places (e.g. Figure 7F). They are opaque in transmitted light, but exhibit metallic luster in reflected light, likely representing pyrite crystals commonly occurring in fossilized bones from the Yezo Group (e.g. Kaim et al., 2008).

    Discussion

    Justification of taxonomic identification

    HMG-357 is identified as a polycotylid based on the morphology of the vertebrae and clavicular arch. Preserved bones of HMG-357 are comparable in size to the previously described Yezo polycotylid specimens which represent relatively small adult individuals (e.g. Sato and Storrs, 2000; Echizenya and Minoura, 2005).

    The vertebrae of HMG-357 shows typical features of polycotylid “pectorals,” such as the short centrum with oval articular faces without a ventral notch, a pair of foramina subcentralia separated by a ridge, large zygapophyses, and the neural spine which narrows dorsally (e.g. Williston, 1903; Adams, 1997; Frey et al., 2017). In contrast, more common elasmosaurid “pectoral” vertebrae are characterized by the square neural spine in which the anterior and posterior comers are thickened and the intervertebral facet bears a ventral notch, and they lack the sharp ridge on the ventral surface of the centrum separating the paired depressions hosting the foramina subcentralia (e.g. Sato et al., 2006). Morphology of the clavicular arch is quite variable among the elasmosaurids (e.g. Welles, 1962), but an elongate interclavicular foramen between the sharp longitudinal ridges as in the HMG specimen has not been reported in any known elasmosaurid taxa. Much less information is available for the Cretaceous pliosauroids because of the paucity of the postcranial materials, but HMG-357 can be distinguished from the two genera with comparable specimens: Brachauchenius which lacks foramina subcentralia (e.g. Williston, 1903; Albright et al., 2007a), and Kronosaurus whose cervical and anterior dorsal centra are taller than wide (Romer and Lewis, 1959). The clavicular arch has been described only in a few pliosauroids (e.g. Peloneustes in Andrews, 1913), but we are not aware of any with an interclavicular foramen and surrounding ridge.

    Figure 7.

    Histological thin sections of the right (?) anteromost dorsal rib (#15) of HMG-357. A, longitudinal section of the proximal portion under natural transmitted light, with square D indicating the location of the close-up image in D of this figure; B, C, transverse sections (B is a few millimeters more distal than C) under natural transmitted light, with squares E to I indicating locations of close-up images in E to I of this figure; D–I, close-ups under polarized microscope showing fiber bundles and the bands of alternating light and dark tissue (D), Haversian tissue (E), Howship's lacunae (arrow heads, F), primary parallel-fibered bone tissue (arrow head, G), secondary lamellar bone tissue (H), and avascular bone tissue with possible lines of arrested growth (arrow head, I).

    f07_265.jpg

    Characteristics of the interclavicular arch of HMG-357 distinguish it from non-polycotylids, but they are fairly common among polycotylids for which detailed comparison is available. HMG-357 shares the presence of a large interclavicular foramen with ridges on the sides with Dolichorhynchops osborni, D. bonneri, Eopolycotylus rankini, and Trinacromerum bentonianum (Williston, 1903, 1908; Adams, 1997; Albright et al., 2007b; O'Keefe, 2008); the taxa with the large foramen range from the Cenomanian to Santoni an or Campanian. In the Campanian—Maastrichtian D. herschelensis Sato, 2005, however, the area for the interclavicular foramen is mostly ossified, leaving very small openings and weak lateral ridges. The interclavicle is poorly preserved or unknown in many polycotylid taxa and it is hard to assess the effect of ontogenetic variability, but the presence of well defined foramen in the adult individual HMG-357 and other early polycotylids suggests that the closure of this foramen in D. herschelensis likely represents an autapomorphic condition.

    Significance of the occurrence of Turonian polycotylids in Japan

    Early polycotylid remains have been reported from the upper Lower Cretaceous of North America and Australia (Druckenmiller and Russell, 2009), although phylogenetic relationships within the group and referral of certain genera at higher taxonomic levels conflict in recent studies (e.g. Albright et al., 2007b; Druckenmiller and Russell, 2008; Ketchum and Benson, 2010; Sato et al., 2011). Diverse polycotylids are known from the Cenomanian to Campanian, mostly from the Western Interior Seaway (WIS) of North America but also from Asia and northern Africa, with the latest ones from the Campanian-Maastrichtian of North America and the Southern Hemisphere (summarized in Druckenmiller and Russell, 2009; Schmeisser McKean and Gillette, 2012).

    The fossil record of Late Cretaceous polycotylids is geographically and stratigraphically sparse and uneven outside the WIS, and the polycotylid remains from the Japanese Cretaceous are important to form an understanding of the global distribution of the group. For example, the Cenomanian occurrence of an indeterminate polycotylid (Sato and Storrs, 2000) and the Turonian age of HMG-357 indicate that polycotylids crossed the Cenomanian-Turonian (C/T) boundary in the northwestern Pacific as they did in the Western Interior Seaway, so that their survival was not a local phenomenon restricted to the latter. No other Late Cretaceous polycotylid localities in the Pacific have a stratigraphic range across the boundary.

    In the Yezo Group of Hokkaido and Sakhalin, C/T boundary events such as faunal turnover among shelled molluscs (ammonoids, inoceramids) and some microfossils, as well as an excursion of the carbon isotope ratio, are recognized, and their causal relationship with an oceanic anoxic event (OAE2) has been debated (e.g. Toshimitsu et al., 2003; Takashima et al., 2004; Yazykova et al., 2004; Takahashi, 2005; Kurihara et al., 2012). Meanwhile, some groups appear to have been less affected. There are no marked extinction events among radiolarians and dinoflagellate cysts (Yazykova et al., 2004; Kaneko and Hirano, 2005), and the coleoid cephalopods Longibelus matsumotoi and Conotheuthis hayakawai occur in Cenomanian and Turonian strata (Tanabe el al., 2017). Sato and Tanabe (1998) reported the occurrence of a Cenomanian polycotylid skeleton which contains many jaw apparati of ammonoids as its stomach contents. Most ammonoid species went extinct at the C/T boundary just to be replaced with other new species in the Turonian (Toshimitsu et al., 2003). Although the number and quality of Yezo plesiosaur specimens are not sufficient to analyze changes at lower taxonomic levels as in these invertebrates, they do demonstrate the survival of the clade across the C/T boundary, thanks to the continuous stratigraphic sequence with fine biostratigraphic resolution.

    Ontogenetic stages and aquatic adaptation inferred from bone histology

    Ontogeny affects morphology and various other aspects of an animal, and the importance of assessing the growth stage of studied specimen(s) cannot be overemphasized. However, growth stages are only roughly estimated for large fossil vertebrates, because their remains are often fragmentary and/or rare, and it is hard to document an ontogenetic sequence. Here we assess the growth stage of HMG-357 based on the osteological and histological features.

    Unlike dinosaurs for which various criteria to distinguish ontogenetic stages have been proposed (summarized in Hone et al., 2016), there are very few previous studies for plesiosaurs. Brown (1981, p. 255) distinguished “juvenile”, “adult”, and “old adult” individuals of plesiosaurs based on osteological characters. An individual is “juvenile” if the neural arches and centra are not fused; it is “adult” if they are fused, and “old adult” if the individual exhibits additional characters indicative of advanced ossification. As Brown himself clearly indicated, these terms should be always used with quotation marks to indicate their special meanings which do not necessarily correspond to the biological age or maturity. Unfortunately this practice is not strictly followed, and it is sometimes unclear whether the distinction of juvenile and adult is based on the criterion set by Brown or not (e.g. Wiffen et al., 1995; Liebe and Hurum, 2012).

    Brown's criterion has been widely used in the description of plesiosaurian specimens, probably because it is so practical; vertebrae are commonly found and easily identified as plesiosaurian. At the same time, it is quite approximate, in particular for the distinction of “adult” and “old adult” specimens. The ontogenetic sequence of ossification remains unknown for plesiosaurs, and it is hard to judge if a particular character of ossification appears earlier or later than other features. In the first place, the sequence of the closure of neurocentral sutures within the vertebral column (e.g. Brochu, 1996; Hone et al., 2016) has not been established to show if there is a consistent pattern within the Plesiosauria or subgroups, so even the distinction of “juvenile” and “adult” is challenged if the suture is partially closed within an individual. It is practically impossible to distinguish “adult” and “old adult” individuals for the fragmentary specimens in which additional characters indicative of advanced ossification cannot be confirmed.

    In the case of HMG-357, the closure and complete obliteration of the neurocentral suture indicates it does not represent a “juvenile” sensu Brown. The interclavicle and clavicles are fused, leaving partially obliterated sutures, and this may be taken as evidence of advanced ossification at an “old adult” level. These bones are fused but sutures are clearly visible at least in one “juvenile” Trinacromerum specimen (the holotype of T. “willstoni” Riggs 1944; T. bentonianum in Carpenter, 1996), and they are at least partially visible in several polycotylid specimens in which neurocentral sutures are closed (e.g. Sato, 2005; Albright et al., 2007b).

    The parallel-fibered avascular bone observed in HMG-357 (Figure 7G) can be interpreted as a sign of slow periosteal growth immediately before death. Woven-fibered tissue with plexiform or radial vascular canals have been observed in the juvenile and subadult individuals of various non-polycotylid plesiosaurs and “pliosaurid” (see Introduction) plesiosaurs (Wiffen et al., 1995; Fostowicz-Frelik and Gazdźicki, 2001; Liebe and Hurum, 2012), suggesting relatively rapid bone deposition (Huttenlocker et al., 2013). Assuming that rapid deposition of bone tissue also occurred in an early ontogenetic stage of polycotylid plesiosaurs, the peripheral bone tissue in HMG-357 may indicate slowed deposition at a late ontogenetic stage of the individual.

    Given that the degree of remodeling is mostly related with skeletal maturity in tetrapods such as dinosaurs and terrestrial mammals (Klein and Sander, 2008; Mitchell et al., 2017), the extensive remodeling of the rib may suggest that HMG-357 reached skeletal maturity. In addition, although obscured by the extensive remodeling, the presence of the peripheral bone tissue which resembles an EFS implies an effective cessation of any significant periosteal growth of the bone in HMG-357 (e.g. Erickson, 2005; Woodward et al., 2011).

    The extensive spongiosa and thin compacta in the studied HMG ribs represent an osteoporotic-like condition (Ricqlès and Buffrénil, 2001), which has been reported in highly aquatic amniotes including extinct taxa such as ichthyosaurs (Houssaye et al., 2014; Houssaye et al., 2016; Nakajima et al., 2014) and mosasaurs (Houssaye et al., 2013). Prominence of the erosion spaces including the Howship's lacunae suggests ongoing osteoclast activity and intense resorption activity. In extant taxa, active swimmers such as cetaceans and pinnipedians display similar microanatomical features (notably the spongy inner organization) requiring efficient swimming abilities (e.g. manoeuvrability, speed) and relying on hydrodynamic buoyancy and body trim control (Ricqlès and Buffrénil, 2001; Houssaye, 2009). Therefore, these results on HMG-357 suggest that this polycotylid plesiosaur had acquired highly aquatic adaptation in bone microstructure.

    In summary, osteological features indicate that HMG-357 represents an “old adult” sensu Brown (1981), in which the periosteal deposition of bone tissue was probably slowed by maturity at least in this part of the skeleton. The microscopic features also exhibit an osteoporoticlike condition, suggesting that polycotylid plesiosaurs were highly aquatic animals.

    Conclusions

    HMG-357 represents an indeterminate polycotylid plesiosaur from the Upper Cretaceous Yezo Group in Hokkaido, Japan. Its stratigraphic origin is estimated to be the upper middle to lower upper Turanian, and the Turanian occurrence demonstrates the survival of the polycotylids across the Cenomanian-Turonian boundary in the northwestern Pacific. The specimen consists of five vertebrae and ribs at the base of the neck, clavicular arch, and a scapular blade, and the ribs were subjected to the first detailed histological study of the Polycotylidae. The complete closure of the neurocentral suture and partial obliteration of the clavicular sutures indicates that the individual reached an advanced stage of ossification. Parallel-fibered tissue and a possible EFS in the rib are signs of slowed growth, and an osteoporotic-like condition suggests that this polycotylid was highly adapted to life in water.

    Acknowledgements

    We thank Ken-ichi Chiyokawa for donating the specimen to the Hobetsu Museum. We are grateful to the museum for permission to use their specimen for destructive analysis, and former and current curators Tsutomu Chitoku and Kazuhiko Sakurai for assisting various aspects of our research. Two anonymous reviewers provided constructive comments and suggestions which improved our manuscript considerably. Chisako Sakata and Makoto Manabe (National Museum of Nature and Science) are thanked for assistance in the use of the CT-scanner, and Koichiro Fujimoto, Masataka Nakata (Tokyo Gakugei University) and Takanobu Tsuihiji (University of Tokyo) for assistance in the use of laboratory equipment. We also thank Yasuhisa Nakajima and Momo Yamashita (University of Tokyo) for their helpful advice, and Janet and David Gillette of the Museum of Northern Arizona for access to comparative specimens. Financial support was provided by the Inaniori Foundation and Tokyo Gakugei University (to TS), JSPS KAKENHI grants 15K05327 (to TS) and 26800270 (to SH).

    References

    1.

    Adams, D. A., 1997: Trinacromerum bonneri, new species, last and fastest plesiosaur of the Western Interior Seaway. Texas Journal of Science , vol. 49, p. 179–198. Google Scholar

    2.

    Albright, L. B. III , D. D. Gillette . and Titus, A. L., 2007a: Plesiosaurs from the Upper Cretaceous (Cenomanian—Turonian) Tropic Shale of southern Utah, part 1: new records of the pliosaur Brachauchenius lucasi. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology , vol. 27, p. 31–40. Google Scholar

    3.

    Albright, L. B. III , D. D. Gillette. and Titus, A. L., 2007b: Plesiosaurs from the Upper Cretaceous (Cenomanian—Turonian) Tropic Shale of southern Utah, part 2: Polycotylidae. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology , vol. 27, p. 41–58. Google Scholar

    4.

    Andrews, C. W., 1913: A Catalogue of the Marine Reptiles of the Oxford Clay, Part II, 206 p., 13 pls. British Museum (Natural History), London. Google Scholar

    5.

    Blainville, H. D. de, 1835: Description de quelques espèces de reptiles de la Californie, précédé de l'analyse d'un système general d'Erpetologie et d'Amphibiologie. Nouvelles Annales du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris , vol. 4, p. 233–296. Google Scholar

    6.

    Brochu, C., 1996: Closure of neurocentral sutures during crocodilian ontogeny: implications for maturity assessment in fossil archosaurs. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology , vol. 16, p. 49–62. Google Scholar

    7.

    Brown, D. S., 1981: The English Upper Jurassic Plesiosauroidea. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Geology , vol. 35, p. 253–347. Google Scholar

    8.

    Carpenter, K., 1996: A review of short-necked plesiosaurs from the Cretaceous of the Western Interior, North America. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie. Abhandlungen, Band201, p. 259–287. Google Scholar

    9.

    Carpenter, K., 1999: Revision of North American elasmosaurs from the Cretaceous of the Western Interior. Paludicola , vol. 2, p. 148–173. Google Scholar

    10.

    Chinsamy, A. and Raath, M., 1992: Preparation of fossil bone for histological examination. Palaeontologia Africana , vol. 29, p. 39–44. Google Scholar

    11.

    Cohen, K. M., Finney, S.C., Gibbard, P. L. and Fan, J.-X., 2013 (updated): The ICS International Chronostratigraphic Chart. Episodes 36: 199–204 [online]. [Cited 22 October 2017]. Available from:  http://www.stratigraphy.org/ICSchart/ChronostratChart2017-02.pdf Google Scholar

    12.

    Cope, E. D., 1869: Synopsis of the extinct Batrachia, Reptilia and Aves of North America, part 1. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, New Series , vol. 14, p. 1–252. Google Scholar

    13.

    Cruickshank, A., Martill, D. and Noe, L., 1996: A pliosaur (Reptilia, Sauropterygia) exhibiting pachyostosis from the Middle Jurassic of England. Journal of the Geological Society , vol. 153, p. 873– 879. Google Scholar

    14.

    Druckenmiller, P. S. and Russell, A. P., 2008: A phylogeny of Plesiosauria (Sauropterygia) and its bearing on the systematic status of Leptocleidus Andrews, 1922. Zootaxa , vol. 1863, p. 1–120. Google Scholar

    15.

    Druckenmiller, P. S. and Russell, A. P., 2009: Earliest North American occurrence of Polycotylidae (Sauropterygia: Plesiosauria) from the Lower Cretaceous (Albian) Clearwater Formation, Alberta, Canada. Journal of Paleontology , vol. 83, p. 981–989. Google Scholar

    16.

    Echizenya, H. and Minoura, N., 2005: Late Cretaceous polycotylid plesiosaur from Mikasa District, Hokkaido. Bulletin of the Hobetsu Museum , vol. 21, p. 1–10. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    17.

    Erickson, G. M., 2005: Assessing dinosaur growth patterns: a microscopic revolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution , vol. 20, p. 677–684. Google Scholar

    18.

    Fostowicz-Frelik, L. and Gaździcki, A., 2001: Anatomy and histology of plesiosaur bones from the Late Cretaceous of Seymour Island, Antarctic Peninsula. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica , vol. 60, p. 7–31. Google Scholar

    19.

    Francillon- Vieillot, H., Buffrénil, V. de, Castanet, J., Géraudie, J. F., Meunier, J., Sire, J. Y., Zylberberg, L. and Ricqlès, A. de, 1990: Micro structure and mineralization of vertebrate skeletal tissues. In, Carter, J. G. ed., Skeletal Biomineralization: Patterns, Processes and Evolutionary Trends, Volume 1, p. 471–530. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York. Google Scholar

    20.

    Frey, E., Mulder, E. W. A., Stinnesbeck, W., Rivera-Sylva, H. E., Padilla-Gutiérrez, J. M. and González-González, A. H., 2017: A new polycotylid plesiosaur with extensive soft tissue preservation from the early Late Cretaceous of northeast Mexico. Boletín de la Sociedad Geológica Mexicana , vol. 69, p. 87–134. Google Scholar

    21.

    Funaki, H. and Hirano, H., 2004: Cretaceous stratigraphy in the northeastern part of the Obira area, Hokkaido, Japan. Bulletin of the Mikasa City Museum, no. 8, p. 17–35. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    22.

    Haines, R. W. and Mohuiddin, A., 1968: Metaplastic bone. Journal of Anatomy , vol. 103, p. 527–538. Google Scholar

    23.

    Hone, D. W. E., Farke, A. A. and Wedel, M. J., 2016: Ontogeny and the fossil record: what, if anything, is an adult dinosaur? Biology Letters, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2015.0947Google Scholar

    24.

    Houssaye, A., 2009: “Pachyostosis” in aquatic amniotes: a review. Integrative Zoology , vol. 4, p. 325–340. Google Scholar

    25.

    Houssaye, A. and Bardet, N., 2012: Rib and vertebral micro-anatomical characteristics of hydropelvic mosasauroids. Lethaia , vol. 45, p. 200–209. Google Scholar

    26.

    Houssaye, A., Lindgren, J., Pellegrini, R., Lee, A. H, Germain, D. and Polcyn, J. M., 2013: Microanatomical and histological features in the long bones of mosasaurine mosasaurs (Reptilia, Squamata): implications for aquatic adaptation and growth rates. Plos One 8, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076741Google Scholar

    27.

    Houssaye, A., Sander, P. M. and Klein, N., 2016: Adaptive patterns in aquatic amniote bone microanatomy—More complex than previously thought. Integrative and Comparative Biology , vol. 56, p. 1349–1369 Google Scholar

    28.

    Houssaye, A., Scheyer, T. M., Kolb, C., Fischer, V. and Sander, P. M., 2014: Anew look at ichthyosaur long bone microanatomy and histology: Implications for their adaptation to an aquatic life. Plos One 9, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095637Google Scholar

    29.

    Huttenlocker, A. K., Woodward, H. N. and Hall, B. K., 2013: The biology of bone. In, Padian, K. and Lamm, E. T. eds. , Bone Histology of Fossil Tetrapods: Advancing Methods, Analysis, and Interpretation, p. 13–34. University of California Press, Berkeley. Google Scholar

    30.

    Kaim, A., Kobayashi, Y., Echizenya, H., Jenkins, R. G. and Tanabe, K., 2008: Chemosynthesis-based associations on Cretaceous plesiosaurid carcasses. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica , vol. 53, p. 97–104. Google Scholar

    31.

    Kaneko, M. and Hirano, H., 2005: Dinoflagellate cyst assemblages and reconstruction of primary productivity across the Cenomanian/ Turanian boundary in the Obira area, northwestern Hokkaido, Japan. Bulletin of the Mikasa City Museum, no. 9, p. 27–39. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    32.

    Ketchum, H. F. and Benson, R. B., 2010: Global interrelationships of Plesiosauria (Reptilia, Sauropterygia) and the pivotal role of taxon sampling in determining the outcome of phylogenetic analyses. Biological Reviews , vol. 85, p. 361–392. Google Scholar

    33.

    Klein, N. and Sander, P. M., 2008: Ontogenetic stages in the long bone histology of sauropod dinosaurs. Paleobiology , vol. 34, p. 247– 263. Google Scholar

    34.

    Konishi, T., Caldwell, M. W., Nishimura, T., Sakurai, K. and Tanoue, K., 2016: A new halisaurine mosasaur (Squamata: Halisaurinae) from Japan: the first record in the western Pacific realm and the first documented insights into binocular vision in mosasaurs. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology , vol. 14, p. 809–839. https://doi.org/10.1080 /14772019.2015.1113447Google Scholar

    35.

    Kurihara, K., Toshimitsu, S. and Hirano, H., 2012: Ammonoid biodiversity changes across the Cenomanian-Turonian boundary in the Yezo Group, Hokkaido, Japan. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica , vol. 57, p. 749–757. Google Scholar

    36.

    Liebe, L. and Hurum, J. H., 2012: Gross internal structure and microstructure of plesiosaur limb bones from the Late Jurassic, central Spitsbergen. Norwegian Journal of Geology , vol. 92, p. 285–309. Google Scholar

    37.

    Main, R., Ricqlès, A., Homer, J. and Padian, K., 2005: The evolution and function of thyreophoran dinosaur scutes: implications for plate function in stegosaurs. Paleobiology , vol. 31, p. 291–314. Google Scholar

    38.

    Matsumoto, T., 1977: Some heteromorph ammonites from the Cretaceous of Hokkaido. Science Reports of the Department of Geology, Kyushu University , vol. 12, p. 303–366, pls. 43–61. Google Scholar

    39.

    McKean, R. S., 2012: A new species of a polycotylid plesiosaur (Reptilia: Sauropterygia) from the Lower Turanian of Utah: Extending the stratigraphic range of Dolichorhynchops. Cretaceous Research , vol. 34, p. 184–199. Google Scholar

    40.

    Mitchell, J., Sander, P. M. and Stein, K., 2017: Can secondary osteons be used as ontogenetic indicators in sauropods? Extending the histological ontogenetic stages into senescence. Paleobiology , vol. 43, p. 321–342. Google Scholar

    41.

    Nakajima, Y., Houssaye, A. and Endo, H., 2014: Osteohistology of the Early Triassic ichthyopterygian reptile Utatsusaurus hataii: Implications for early ichthyosaur biology. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica , vol. 59, p. 343–352. Google Scholar

    42.

    Nakaya, H., 1989: Upper Cretaceous elasmosaurid (Reptilia, Plesiosauria) from Hobetsu, Hokkaido, northern Japan. Transactions and Proceedings of the Palaeontological Society of Japan, New Series, no. 154, p. 96–116. Google Scholar

    43.

    Ogawa, K. and Nakaya, H., 1998: Late Cretaceous Elasmosauridae fossils from Nakagawa, Hokkaido, Japan. Bulletin of the Nakagawa Museum of Natural History , vol. 1, p. 3–52. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    44.

    O'Keefe, F. R., 2008: Cranial anatomy and taxonomy of Dolichorhynchops bonneri new combination, a polycotylid (Sauropterygia: Plesiosauria) from the Pierre Shale of Wyoming and South Dakota. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology , vol. 28, p. 664–676. Google Scholar

    45.

    Owen, R., 1860: On the orders of fossil and recent Reptilia, and their distribution in time. Reports of the British Association for the Advancement of Science , vol. 29, p. 153–166. Google Scholar

    46.

    Petermann, H. and Sander, P. M., 2013: Histological evidence for muscle insertion in extant amniote femora: implications for muscle reconstruction in fossils. Journal of Anatomy , vol. 222, p. 419– 436. Google Scholar

    47.

    Ricqlès, A. and Buffrénil, V., 2001: Bone histology, heterochronies and the return of tetrapods to life in water: where are we? In, Mazin, J. M. and Buffrénil, V. eds., Secondary Adaptation of Tetrapods to Life in Water, p. 289–310. Pfeil Verlag, München. Google Scholar

    48.

    Riggs, E. S., 1944: A new polycotylid plesiosaur. University of Kansas Science Bulletin , vol. 30, p. 77–87. Google Scholar

    49.

    Romer, A. S. and Lewis, A. D., 1959: A mounted skeleton of the giant plesiosaur Kronosaurus. Breviora , vol. 112, p. 1–15. Google Scholar

    50.

    Sander, P. M., Mateus, O., Laven, T. and Knötschke, N., 2006: Bone histology indicates insular dwarfism in a new Late Jurassic sauropod dinosaur. Nature , vol. 441, p. 739–741. Google Scholar

    51.

    Sato, T., 2005: A new polycotylid plesiosaur (Reptilia, Sauropterygia) from the Upper Cretaceous Bearpaw Formation in Saskatchewan, Canada. Journal of Paleontology , vol. 79, p. 969–980. Google Scholar

    52.

    Sato, T., Hasegawa, Y. and Manabe, M., 2006: A new elasmosaurid plesiosaur from the Upper Cretaceous of Fukushima, Japan. Palaeontology , vol. 49, p. 467–484. Google Scholar

    53.

    Sato, T., Konishi, T., Hirayama, R. and Caldwell, M. W., 2012: A review of the Upper Cretaceous marine reptiles from Japan. Cretaceous Research , vol. 37, p. 319–340. Google Scholar

    54.

    Sato, T. and Nishimura, T., 2012: Clavicular arch of a polycotylid plesiosaur from Obira Town, Hokkaido. Abstracts with Programs, 161st Regular Meeting of the Palaeontological Society of Japan, Tomioka, Gunma, p. 14. (in Japanese with English titleGoogle Scholar

    55.

    Sato, T. and Storrs, G. W., 2000: An early polycotylid plesiosaur (Reptilia; Sauropterygia) from the Cretaceous of Hokkaido, Japan. Journal of Paleontology , vol. 74, p. 907–914. Google Scholar

    56.

    Sato, T. and Tanabe, K., 1998: Cretaceous plesiosaurs ate ammonites. Nature , vol. 394, p. 629. Google Scholar

    57.

    Sato, T., Wu, X.-C., Tirabasso, A. and Bloskie, P., 2011: Braincase of a polycotylid plesiosaur (Reptilia: Sauropterygia) from the Upper Cretaceous of Manitoba, Canada. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology , vol. 31, p. 313–329. Google Scholar

    58.

    Street, H. P. and O'Keefe, F. R., 2010: Evidence of pachyostosis in the cryptocleidoid plesiosaur Tatenectes laramiensis from the Sundance Formation of Wyoming. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology , vol. 30, p. 1279–1282. Google Scholar

    59.

    Takahashi, A., 2005 : Responses of inoceramid bivalves to environmental disturbances across the Cenomanian/Turonian boundary in the Yezo forearc basin, Hokkaido, Japan. Cretaceous Research , vol. 26. p. 567–580. Google Scholar

    60.

    Takashima, R., Kawabe, F., Nishi, H., Moriya, K., Wani, R. and Ando, H., 2004: Geology and stratigraphy of forearc basin sediments in Hokkaido, Japan: Cretaceous environmental events on the northwest Pacific margin. Cretaceous Research , vol. 25, p. 365–390. Google Scholar

    61.

    Talevi, M. and Fernández, M. S., 2014: Remodeling of skeletal tissues bone and structural specialisations in an elasmosaurid (Sauropterygia: Plesiosauroidea) from the Upper Cretaceous of Patagonia, Argentina. Historical Biology , vol. 27, p. 1–8. Google Scholar

    62.

    Tanabe, K., Hirano, H., Matsumoto, T. and Miyata, Y., 1977: Stratigraphy of the Upper Cretaceous deposits in the Obira area, northwestern Hokkaido. Science Reports of the Department of Geology, Kyushu University, vol. 12, p. 203–214. (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    63.

    Tanabe, K., Misaki, A., Hikida, Y. and Nishimura, T., 2017: New records of coleoid cephalopod jaws from the Upper Cretaceous of Hokkaido, Japan, and their paleobiogeographic and evolutionary implications. Cretaceous Research , vol. 70, p. 128–141. Google Scholar

    64.

    Toshimitsu, S. and Hirano, H., 2000: Database of the Cretaceous ammonoids in Japan—Stratigraphic distribution and bibliography. Bulletin of the Geological Survey of Japan , vol. 51, p. 559–613. Google Scholar

    65.

    Toshimitsu, S., Hirano, H., Matsumoto, T. and Takahashi, K., 2003: Databse and species diversity of Japanese Cretaceous ammonoids. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences , vol. 21, p. 887–893. Google Scholar

    66.

    Tsushima, K., Tanaka, K., Matsuno, K. and Yamaguchi, S., 1958: Geological Sheet Map “Tappu”, Scale 1:50,000 and its Explanatory Text, 74 p. Geological Survey of Japan, Kawasaki, (in Japanese with English abstractGoogle Scholar

    67.

    Welles, S. P., 1943: Elasmosaurid plesiosaurs with description of new material from California and Colorado. Memoirs of the University of California , vol. 13, p. 125”254. Google Scholar

    68.

    Welles, S. P., 1962: A new species of elasmosaur from the Aptian of Columbia and a review of the Cretaceous plesiosaurs. University of California. Publications in Geological Sciences, vol. 44, p. 1”196. Google Scholar

    69.

    Wiffen, J., Buffrénil, V. de, Ricqlès, A. de and Mazin, J., 1995: Ontogenetic evolution of bone structure in Late Cretaceous Plesiosauria from New Zealand. Geobios , vol. 28, p. 625–640. Google Scholar

    70.

    Williston, S. W., 1903: North American plesiosaurs, Part 1. Field Columbian Museum Publication 73, Geological Series , vol. 2, p. 1–77. Google Scholar

    71.

    Williston, S. W., 1908: North American plesiosaurs: Trinacromerum. Journal of Geology , vol. 16, p. 715–735. Google Scholar

    72.

    Woodward, H. N., Horner, J. R. and Farlow, J. O., 2011: Osteohistological evidence for determinate growth in the American alligator. Journal of Herpetology , vol. 45, p. 339–342. Google Scholar

    73.

    Yazykova, E. A., Peryt, D., Zonova, T. D. and Kasintzova, L. I., 2004: The Cenomanian/Turonian boundary in Sakhalin, Far East Russia: Ammonites, inoceramids, foraminifera, and radiolarians. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics , vol. 47, p. 291–320. Google Scholar
    © by the Palaeontological Society of Japan
    Tamaki Sato, Tomoya Hanai, Shoji Hayashi, and Tomohiro Nishimura "A Turonian Polycotylid Plesiosaur (Reptilia: Sauropterygia) from Obira Town, Hokkaido, and Its Biostratigraphic and Paleoecological Significance," Paleontological Research 22(3), 265-278, (1 July 2018). https://doi.org/10.2517/2017PR024
    Received: 13 December 2016; Accepted: 20 November 2017; Published: 1 July 2018
    KEYWORDS
    Cenomanian-Turonian boundary
    Histology
    ontogeny
    Plesiosauria
    Polycotylidae
    Back to Top