Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
5 March 2024 Linking Migration Flows With the Prevalence of Exotic Plant Species in the Andes
Maríá Virginia González, Lia Montti, Yohana G. Jimenez, Ezequiel Aráoz
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Human mobility and connectivity between cities are key features of globalization that foster urban expansion, landscape transformations, and changes in species distributions. Andean ecosystems which function as biodiversity reservoirs, are vulnerable to environmental changes and to the introduction of exotic species. Through this study, we assess the association of migratory flows and other socioenvironmental characteristics with the prevalence of exotic woody species in the Andean region. We collected data on urban and demographic dynamics, migration proxies, and topographic and climate indicators for every first-order administrative unit of the Andean region. We used global biodiversity databases to obtain occurrence records of woody plants and estimated the proportion of exotic species records in each administrative unit. We performed multiple regression models that assessed the association of this prevalence with socioenvironmental information, and we compared them using the Akaike information criterion. We obtained 2,461,168 records of native species and 891,579 records of exotic species. Topography, climate, and immigration were included i the 10 best models, suggesting that the social connectivity of administrative units (through immigration) is a driver of changes in species composition of local communities. We consider that the prevalence of exotic species in woody plant composition is highly influenced by cultural drivers through the introduction of exotic species and through their use in urban and periurban environments.

Introduction

Human migration, which entails social and cultural connectivity between regions, may drive ecological changes and influence ecosystem functioning and biodiversity. In South America, human migration is directed toward urban systems, which host around 80% of the population, and drives biophysical and demographic changes far beyond urban areas, modifying socioecological systems (Donoso and Sarmiento 2021). Urban areas, which function as an intertwined network connected through flows of people, material, money, and information (Seto et al 2012), usually constitute focal points for the introduction of exotic species (Spear et al 2013). As a result, tree communities in urban areas present a limited subset of native species and an overrepresentation of exotic species (McKinney 2006; Cadotte et al 2017), which may turn invasive under certain conditions (Pauchard et al 2016).

Exotic species constitute one of the main threats to the functioning of Andean ecosystems, which present relatively low proportions of rural population and reduced likelihood of deforestation (Aide et al 2019). In South America, urban areas have played a significant role in driving socioecological change, because of their increased connection with global and local markets and because of human migration (Aide and Grau 2004). Urbanization and urban growth are expected to continue, and projections indicate that 90% of people will live in cities by 2050 (Parés-Ramos et al 2013), posing significant challenges to the sustainability of socioecological systems (Branca and Haller 2021). The Andean region constitutes a biodiversity hotspot characterized by complex topography and reduced accessibility due to geographic barriers, such as mountains and the Amazon forests (Stadel 2000). While South American moist lowland forests currently undergo deforestation and degradation, forest recovery often occurs at high elevations and on slopes (Nanni et al 2015). Thus, the introduction of exotic species with invasive potential poses a significant concern because of their capacity to disrupt species composition, ecosystem functioning, and the provision of essential ecosystem services (Jimenez et al 2021).

The relationship of species composition (native and exotic) and species richness with socioeconomic conditions is a hot topic in human–nature studies (eg Guo et al 2012). The association of international migration with the introduction of exotic species has been addressed in previous analyses focusing on trade dynamics and climate change (Chapman et al 2016), but the association of exotic trees and human migration at the local scale has frequently been disregarded. Most studies on introductions of exotic species are carried out in wealthy regions of the world (Capinha et al 2023). This is especially concerning because tropical and subtropical zones present high biodiversity and are located in developing countries that have fewer economic resources for research and conservation (Nuñez and Pauchard 2010; Early et al 2016). Further, local variability is often neglected (Lopez-Angulo et al 2018) leading to inadequate conservation strategies.

Although urban processes influence the diversity of native and exotic species (Fischer et al 2016; Cadotte et al 2017; Mehraj et al 2018), the extent to which this influence is explained by human mobility is unclear, owing to a lack of high-resolution homogeneous migratory data at regional scales. The goal of this study was to assess the influence of human mobility and the social connectivity of cities on the prevalence of exotic woody species (estimated as the proportion of their occurrence) in Andean environments. To achieve this goal, we (1) collected data on the occurrence of native and exotic woody plants in the Andean region obtained from global biodiversity databases, (2) developed metrics of immigration from 2010 (last census) and urban development for each major administrative unit, and (3) evaluated the influence of human movement and urban development on the proportion of exotic species in each, considering other socioenvironmental variables that may influence this ratio. Human migration indicates the level of connectivity and globalization of cities where migrants arrive and bring cultural values, skills, remittances, or even plants that ultimately influence their surroundings.

Material and methods

Study area

This study was carried out in 6 Andean countries: Argentina, Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, and Venezuela (Table 1), classified as low- and middle-income countries according to the World Bank (n.d.). In this study, we considered every first-order administrative unit taken from the Global Administrative Unit Layers database (FAO 2015) whose boundaries overlapped our study area. Within these countries, we selected the administrative units that belonged to the Andes region following the classification of Tovar et al (2022). The Andes are a mountain range spanning over 9000 km in length and reaching over 6000 m in elevation (Tovar et al 2022) that encompasses diverse ecosystems and hosts almost 10% of the vascular plant species in the world (Pérez-Escobar et al 2022).

TABLE 1

Comparison and characterization of the migration dynamics and demographics between Andean countries.

img-z2-2_R1.gif

The socioecological system studied experienced growth of urban areas with increasing concentrations of population and economic activity between 1950 and 2010 (Buytaert and Bievre 2012; Cerrutti and Parrado 2015). The study area encompasses different stages of urban transition (the shift from low to high urban development related to history and the country's economic development; Álvarez-Berríos et al 2013). Urban transitions range from Bolivia and Ecuador, with a low to medium proportion of urban population and high urban growth, to Argentina, Colombia, and Peru, where urban growth has slowed down (Álvarez-Berríos et al 2013; Bernard et al 2017).

Data

An overview of all data used is provided in Table 2. The table also explains their relevance for our study.

TABLE 2

Overview of data selected; their relevance is related not only to prevalence of exotic woody plants but also to the mountain context in which the analysis takes place.

img-z3-2_R1.gif

Woody species data: Information on woody species records was collected during February and March of 2023 from several databases (Table 2): the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF 2023a, 2023b), the Botanical Information and Ecology Network (Enquist et al 2016), Integrated Digitized Biocollections (Michonneau and Collins 2017), and Species Link (Thiers et al 2022). In this study, we only included woody plants (trees and bushes), since these plants tend to thrive in urban areas because of human intervention and management practices (Ossola et al 2020).

To systematize and integrate records from different databases, we used the bdc package of the R software (Ribeiro et al 2022). Species names were standardized according to the Leipzig Vascular Plants Catalogue (Freiberg et al 2020). We classified every plant species based on its origin (native or exotic) using the GlobalTreeSearch Species List (Beech et al 2017). For every first-order administrative unit, we estimated the proportion of exotic woody plant records in relation to the total number of woody species records (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1

Exotic woody plants in proportion to the total number of woody species by first-order administrative unit in the Andean region.

img-z4-2_R1.jpg

Migration data: We obtained migration data from WorldPop Hub, a portal of open spatial demographic data and dynamics that includes over 40,000 datasets. The dataset on migration flows (Ceauşu et al 2019) comprises migrant stocks obtained from censuses from 2010. Migrants are people whose administrative unit of residence changed in the previous 5 years (Ceauşu et al 2019). We estimated a migration index for each administrative unit that combined internal and international migration. Because of the size of values and variation, we estimated the logarithm of international migrant flows and multiplied it by the logarithm of internal migration for each country to obtain a weighted immigration flow index (Figure 2). This immigration index constitutes an integral indicator of local and international human social mobility (Table 2).

FIGURE 2

Index of weighted immigration flows by first-order administrative unit in the Andean region.

img-z4-7_R1.jpg

Urban development: We estimated different metrics of urban development that may affect the prevalence of exotic species. We used the most recent census for each administrative unit to estimate its population. The time since the city's foundation is deemed to indicate the period of urban interconnection (Table 2), so we used the foundation date of cities (Grau and Foguet 2021).

We used the harmonized global nighttime light dataset (Li et al 2020) to characterize the urban dynamics from 2000 to 2021 (Table 2). This dataset comprises sensor-detected nighttime light data from 2000 to 2021, making it possible to delineate urban expansion. Nighttime light values range from 0 to 63, and values over 20 are considered reliable urban pixels (Li et al 2020). We estimated the trend in nighttime lights by regressing yearly radiance against the calendar year. Finally, we calculated nighttime lights per inhabitant (Table 2) by dividing the population of each administrative unit by the number of urban pixels in 2020.

Natural environment: Since environmental conditions, such as climate and topography, can influence plant distributions and establishment, we included mean elevation, the standard deviation of elevation, mean precipitation, precipitation range, and mean temperature of each administrative unit in the analysis (Table 2).

Data analysis

To identify the most important variables to explain exotic woody species' prevalence, we performed multiple linear regression models. We considered all the linear combinations of explanatory variables (mean temperature, mean precipitation, precipitation range, mean elevation, standard deviation of elevation, foundation date, nighttime lights per inhabitant, nighttime light trends, total population, weighted immigration flows; Table 2) to explain the prevalence of exotic woody plants within each administrative unit. We conserved the most parsimonious models (the ones that were within 2 units of the Akaike information criterion [AIC]; Vrieze 2012) with respect to the best model. AIC is a metric that indicates the balance between data adjustment and model complexity. We averaged the most parsimonious models to assess the effect of each explaining variable on exotic prevalence (Symonds and Moussalli 2010). We also evaluated the frequency of each variable in the most parsimonious models to assess their consistency. All these analyses were performed using R software (R Core Development Team 2021).

Results

We collected 2,461,168 records of 10,365 native woody species across our study area. Of these native occurrences, 68.9% were from Colombia (1,698,175), 15.9% from Peru (392,990), 7.5% from Ecuador (186,760), 6.1% from Bolivia (150,292), 0.7% from Venezuela (18,320), and 0.6% from Argentina (14,631).

We gathered 891,579 records of 14,149 exotic species across the same 6 countries. Of these total occurrences, 64.6% were from Colombia (576,239), 9.6% were from Peru (85,031), 11.1% were from Ecuador (98,682), 7.8% were from Bolivia (69,319), 1.5% were from Venezuela (13,384), and 5.5% were from Argentina (48,874) (Table 1).

After model comparison (n 5 511 possible models; see  Table S1 (Gonzalez_MRD2023_Supplemental_material_Tables1-2.pdf), Supplemental material,  https://doi.org/10.1659/mrd.2023.00017.S1) we conserved 10 models (AIC between –175,233 and –173,233; Table 3). These models included immigration flows alongside climate indicators as predictive variables. Moreover, most of the models included at least one additional social variable such as total population, nighttime light trends, nighttime lights per inhabitant, and foundation date (see  Table S2 (Gonzalez_MRD2023_Supplemental_material_Tables1-2.pdf), Supplemental material,  https://doi.org/10.1659/mrd.2023.00017.S1). Model averaging showed that the prevalence of exotic species increased in association with weighted immigration flows. Additionally, there was a positive correlation concerning the standard deviation of elevation as well as nighttime lights per inhabitant (Figure 3). In contrast, the prevalence of exotic woody plants exhibited a decrease relative to mean temperature, mean elevation, and mean precipitation (Figure 3).

TABLE 3

Best 10 models with their predictors and the predictors' significance in each model.

img-z5-2_R1.gif

FIGURE 3

Main results of regression models between the proportion of exotic woody plants and different socioenvironmental predictors.

img-z6-2_R1.jpg

Discussion

Migrants do not come empty-handed

Since woody plants are long-lived organisms that can persist for many years, the current species composition and their dynamics are a legacy of anthropogenic disturbance and human mobility (Kowarik and von der Lippe 2008; Pemberton and Liu 2009). Our results showed that social connectivity plays a significant role in shaping species composition and abundance in Andean ecosystems. Human mobility, assessed through an immigration indicator, was a better predictor of exotic species prevalence in woody vegetation communities than other plausible socioeconomic indicators such as population or the date the city was founded (although they also played some role). The effect of migration on species composition is likely explained by 3 different processes: (1) Increased human mobility is associated with more frequent introductions of exotic species, which can establish viable populations and eventually become invaders (Mack and Lonsdale 2001; Hulme 2009). (2) Immigrating people can influence the cultural values of local communities and promote or suppress the use of certain species in managed urban landscapes (Reichard and White 2001; García Lerena et al 2018). (3) Immigrating people may foster urban expansion and increase disturbance frequency and intensity (eg road construction, natural cover fragmentation), which provide new places where pioneer species with high propagule pressure may thrive (Mehraj et al 2018).

Migration patterns in the Andes have undergone a shift from rural–urban to interurban migration, primarily from small towns to larger cities (Medina et al 2016). This transformation is propelled by the pursuit of better opportunities, although in certain instances, migration is influenced by the expansion of agricultural frontiers. For example, in Ecuador, migration flows are concentrated toward the Amazonian lowlands (driven by the search for farmlands) and close to the capital city, Quito, in the highlands, motivated by urban amenities (Medina et al 2016). In Colombia, human mobility has been shaped by political and economic changes, such as the eradication of armed conflict and improved economic growth (Ramírez 2012). Although immigration is usually considered a relevant driver of population distribution and landscape modification (Bernard et al 2017; Royuela and Ordóñez 2018), the assessment of the association of migration flows and the prevalence of exotic plant species remains relatively unexplored. Our results highlight that human mobility, an indicator of the connectivity of a region, is associated with higher proportions of exotic species records (Figure 4). Moreover, using the combination of data on internal and international migration, we were able to overcome the problem associated with scarcity and reduced accessibility to information, which usually hinders studies on the association between human migration and species composition.

FIGURE 4

Correlation between the proportion of woody plants and weighted immigration flows. The solid line represents the fitted regression line. Bars indicate the deviations (residuals) between the observed values and those predicted by the regression. Smaller deviations represent a more accurate fit.

img-z7-2_R1.jpg

Invasibility patterns in the Andes: climate and people moving plants

The Andean region presents a high diversity of biophysical conditions (eg topography, climate, and land cover) that interact with Andean societies (eg through exotic species introductions and changes in land use and disturbance regimes) to determine their invasibility. Invasibility refers to traits of the receiving communities that enable the establishment and expansion of exotic species (Vicente et al 2010). Most arrivals of exotic plants involve connections with remote places; however, the establishment of new plant populations is moderated by the interaction of species characteristics and biophysical conditions (Furlan et al 2016). For instance, in mountain areas, the prevalence of exotic species decreases with elevation because of adverse biophysical conditions and reduced accessibility (Marini et al 2013). The latitudinal gradient also plays a role, for example, in low latitudes, characterized by less-stressing environmental conditions (eg high temperature and precipitation) and diverse native communities that may act as biological barriers reducing invasibility (Naeem et al 2000; Sax and Gaines 2008).

Because of their geographic isolation and steep slopes, which are associated with wide gradients of environmental conditions, mountains are extremely vulnerable to climate change. Climate warming and human interventions are likely to eliminate the barriers to the upward migration of exotic woody plants. This phenomenon is particularly evident in lowland cities, where changing temperature and precipitation patterns are weakening the limits to exotic plant migration upward (Payne et al 2020; Jimenez et al 2021). In addition, in higher latitudes there is a widespread use of exotic species (Egerer et al 2019) for aesthetic, recreational, and productive purposes, especially when native communities are present in small patches or when native species are undervalued for human uses (Sjöman et al 2016). For example, in harsh regions, cultivated cosmopolitan plants, such as Pinus, Ulmus, and Eucalyptus, are more likely to be used (Furlan et al 2016) to overcome resource scarcity with regard to specific purposes, such as silviculture (Thuiller et al 2006) or agriculture, as with Prunus persica in the puna region (Stampella et al 2013). In conclusion, it is likely that at least part of the increased prevalence of exotic species in harsher environments is explained by their adaptive traits, acclimatation capacity, and tolerance to adverse conditions that have been widely used for human purposes.

Ecosystem services and disservices of exotic plants in the Andes

The functioning of Andean ecosystems and the provision of ecosystem services depends on their identity and structural complexity. Alteration in species composition can disrupt the predictability of these ecosystem services and increase the vulnerability of local communities (eg exotic plants associated with fire regimes because of their traits; Contreras et al 2011) through alteration of dynamics in native plant communities (increased fire frequency) that are valuable for ecosystem services provision, such as water regulation.

At present, exotic species do not reach high densities in high elevations, but their presence in these environments, even at low densities, may disrupt ecosystem functions (Morales and Aizen 2002; Pauchard et al 2009). It is important to note that exotic plants can also offer ecosystem benefits, as they can host certain invertebrates (Salisbury et al 2017) or provide additional services. Exotic forest expansion in the surroundings of urban centers and low-residential areas enhances water regulation services and the capacity to sequester atmospheric carbon dioxide, showcasing the complex interactions between exotic and native species in Andean ecosystems (Jimenez et al 2023).

Big data: advantages and biases

Our study explored the role of socioeconomic development on the prevalence of exotic woody species using a novel approach that combines indicators of human migration with massive biodiversity data. Migration data are scarce, so we built an indicator of human mobility using the highest-resolution regional dataset available and combining it with emerging datasets on biodiversity.

Recent years have witnessed a significant increase in available biodiversity data, providing new opportunities to explore patterns and processes governing exotic plant dynamics. Biodiversity records, georeferenced by museums, herbaria, and citizens, are aggregated in regional and global datasets (Franklin et al 2017). However, challenges persist in handling these data, including geolocation and taxonomic uncertainties and sampling biases. For example, sampling is uneven across geographical space: with most sampling concentrated near roads and cities in the lowlands, the Andes tend to be underrepresented (Hughes et al 2021). Quantitative modifications to avoid these biases, such as evaluating the proportion of exotic species, rather than their raw abundance, must be implemented. In addition, the northern Andes (eg Colombia with 60% of exotic occurrences), which has higher native biodiversity, has more information about species occurrences. It is crucial to recognize the limitations of biodiversity records to avoid drawing inaccurate conclusions about vegetation patterns and dynamics; for example, range maps or diversity maps with erroneous records may lead to inaccurate results. These biases may be explained by a combination of factors: (1) inventories are usually restricted to forest vegetation, (2) exotic species lists underestimate the number of exotic species in each country (eg Global Register of Introduced and Invasive Species [GRIIS]; Seebens and Kaplan 2022), and (3) there is an overrepresentation of urban trees in citizen science studies (Ossola et al 2020). In this study, the inclusion of all the exotic woody species rather than only those included in GRIIS allowed us to generate a more complete database.

Final considerations and future perspectives

Social connectivity and human disturbance have led to changes in ecosystems where exotic species (eg woody plants) can accumulate and increase local biodiversity. The migration of people from diverse backgrounds introduces a myriad of perspectives, experiences, and values that significantly influence the development and construction of the biophysical environment. In some cases, species introductions turn into biological invasions, leading to unexpected outputs in the provision of ecosystem services. These complex processes need to be analyzed along with other socioeconomic changes (eg urbanization, land use changes, climate warming) and biophysical patterns.

Considering that global human migration is expected to increase by up to 200 million by 2050 (Black et al 2011), it is likely that the exchange of plants outside their current distribution range will increase. This will raise the risk of biological invasions. The emergent pattern could be universal and can be identified in cities of different sizes, cultures, and geographies. This is an exploratory and initial insight into what is hopefully a new research agenda, where we can explore the environmental impacts of migratory movements as part of urban processes. Human migration is far more complex and multifaceted, but, by identifying drivers of exotic woody plant introductions, this study aims to contribute to a solid basis for understanding the impacts of human mobility on biodiversity.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We want to thank Dr Santiago Velazco, who provided the scripts for the extraction, curation, and merging of biodiversity data. Also, we recognize the valuable contribution of Javier Foguet, who provided the database of the foundation date of every Andean city. We thank the anonymous reviewers and the editor for the valuable comments that led to a significant improvement of this article.

© 2024 González et al.

This open access article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please credit the authors and the full source.

REFERENCES

1.

Aide TM, Grau HR . 2004. Globalization, migration, and Latin American ecosystems. Policy forum. Science 305(5692):1915–1916.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1103179Google Scholar

2.

Aide TM, Grau HR, Graesser J, Andrade-Nuñez MJ, Aráoz E, Barros AP, Campos-Cerqueira M, Chacon-Moreno E, Cuesta F, Espinoza R , et al. 2019. Woody vegetation dynamics in the tropical and subtropical Andes from 2001 to 2014: Satellite image interpretation and expert validation. Global Change Biology 25(6):2112–2126.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14618Google Scholar

3.

Alvarez-Berríós NL, Parés-Ramos IK, Aide TM . 2013. Contrasting patterns of urban expansion in Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, and Bolivia between 1992 and 2009. Ambio 42(1):29–40.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-012-0344-8Google Scholar

4.

Beech E, Rivers M, Oldfield S, Smith PP . 2017. GlobalTreeSearch: The first complete global database of tree species and country distributions. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 36(5):454–489.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2017.1310049Google Scholar

5.

Bernard A, Rowe F, Bell M, Ueffing P, Charles-Edwards E . 2017. Comparing internal migration across the countries of Latin America: A multidimensional approach. PLOS ONE 12(3):e0173895.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173895Google Scholar

6.

Black R, Adger WN, Arnell NW, Dercon S, Geddes A, Thomas D . 2011. The effect of environmental change on human migration. Global Environmental Change 21: S3–S11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.10.001Google Scholar

7.

Branca D, Haller A . 2021. Urbanization, touristification and verticality in the Andes: A profile of Huaraz, Peru. Sustainability 13(11):6438.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116438Google Scholar

8.

Brun P, Zimmermann NE, Hari C, Pellissier L, Karger D . 2022. CHELSA-BIOCLIM+ a novel set of global climate-related predictors at kilometre-resolution. EnviDat.  https://doi.org/10.16904/envidat.332Google Scholar

9.

Buytaert W, Bievre BD . 2012. Water for cities: The impact of climate change and demographic growth in the tropical Andes. Water Resources Research 48(8): W08503.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011755Google Scholar

10.

Cadotte MW, Yasui SLE, Livingstone S, MacIvor JS . 2017. Are urban systems beneficial, detrimental, or indifferent for biological invasion? Biological Invasions 19(12):3489–3503.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1586-yGoogle Scholar

11.

Capinha C, Essl F, Porto M, Seebens H . 2023. The worldwide networks of spread of recorded alien species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120(1):e2201911120.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2201911120Google Scholar

12.

Ceauşu S, Woods D, Utazi CE, Abel GJ, Vollenweider X, Tatem AJ, Sorichetta A . 2019. Mapping Gender-Disaggregated Migration Movements at Subnational Scales in and Between Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Southampton, United Kingdom: WorldPop.  https://doi.org/10.5258/SOTON/WP00673Google Scholar

13.

Cerrutti M, Parrado E . 2015. Intraregional migration in South America: Trends and a research agenda. Annual Review of Sociology 41:399–421.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112249Google Scholar

14.

Chapman DS, Makra L, Albertini R, Bonini M, Páldy A, Rodinkova V, Sikoparija B, Weryszko-Chmielewska E, Bullock JM . 2016. Modelling the introduction and spread of non-native species: International trade and climate change drive ragweed invasion. Global Change Biology 22(9):3067–3079.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13220Google Scholar

15.

Contreras TE, Figueroa JA, Abarca L, Castro SA . 2011. Fire regimen and spread of plants naturalized in central Chile. Revista chilena de historia natural 84(3):307–323. Google Scholar

16.

Danielson JJ, Gesch DB . 2011. Global Multi-Resolution Terrain Elevation Data 2010 (GMTED2010). Reston, VA: USGS [US Geological Survey] Publications Warehouse, EROS [Earth Resources Observation and Science] Center.  https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20111073Google Scholar

17.

Donoso ME, Sarmiento FO . 2021. Changing mountain farmscapes: Vulnerability and migration drivers in the Paute River watershed, southern Ecuador. Journal of Mountain Science 18(7):1902–1919.  https://doi.org/10.1007/S11629-0206127-Y/METRICSGoogle Scholar

18.

Early R, Bradley BA, Dukes JS, Lawler JJ, Olden JD, Blumenthal DM, Gonzalez P, Grosholz ED, Ibañez I, Miller LP , et al. 2016. Global threats from invasive alien species in the twenty-first century and national response capacities. Nature Communications 7(1):12485.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12485Google Scholar

19.

Egerer MH, Lin BB, Threlfall CG, Kendal D . 2019. Temperature variability influences urban garden plant richness and gardener water use behavior, but not planting decisions. Science of the Total Environment 646:111–120. Google Scholar

20.

Enquist BJ, Condit R, Peet RK, Schildhauer M, Thiers BM . 2016. Cyberinfrastructure for an integrated botanical information network to investigate the ecological impacts of global climate change on plant biodiversity. PeerJ Preprints 4:e2615v2.  https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2615v2Google Scholar

21.

FAO [Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations]. 2015. Global Administrative Unit Layers (GAUL). FAO Map Catalog. Rome, Italy: FAO.  https://data.apps.fao.org/map/catalog/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/9c35ba10-5649-41c8-bdfc-eb78e9e65654 ; accessed on 30 January 2023. Google Scholar

22.

Fischer LK, Rodorff V, von der Lippe M, Kowarik I . 2016. Drivers of biodiversity patterns in parks of a growing South American megacity. Urban Ecosystems 19(3):1231–1249.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-016-0537-1Google Scholar

23.

Franklin J, Serra-Diaz JM, Syphard AD, Regan HM . 2017. Big data for forecasting the impacts of global change on plant communities. Global Ecology and Biogeography 26(1):6–17.  https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12501Google Scholar

24.

Freiberg M, Winter M, Gentile A, Zizka A, Muellner-Riehl AN, Weigelt A, Wirth C . 2020. LCVP, the Leipzig catalogue of vascular plants, a new taxonomic reference list for all known vascular plants. Scientific Data 7(1):416.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-00702-zGoogle Scholar

25.

Furlan V, Kujawska M, Hilgert NI, Pochettino ML . 2016. To what extent are medicinal plants shared between country home gardens and urban ones? A case study from Misiones, Argentina. Pharmaceutical Biology 54(9):1628–1640.  https://doi.org/10.3109/13880209.2015.1110600Google Scholar

26.

Garcíá Lerena M, Doumecq M, Stampella P, Pochettino M . 2018. Las raíces del paisaje: los árboles en la construcción de las estancias de la región pampeana argentina. In : Alcantra M, Montero MG, Sanchez Lopez F, editors. Ciencias y Medio Ambiente. Memoria del 568 Congreso Internacional de Americanistas. Salamanca, Spain: Universidad de Salamanca, pp 115–132.  https://doi.org/10.14201/0AQ0251_4Google Scholar

27.

GBIF [Global Biodiversity Information Facility]. 2023a. GBIF Occurrence Download. Copenhagen, Denmark: GBIF.org.  https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.d92t3cGoogle Scholar

28.

GBIF [Global Biodiversity Information Facility]. 2023b. GBIF Occurrence Download. Copenhagen, Denmark: GBIF.org.  https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.hswebfGoogle Scholar

29.

Grau HR, Foguet J . 2021. El legado de la urbanización europea en el cono sur sudamericano: una aproximación a la historia de las teleconexiones sobre la ecología del territorio. Ecologia Austral 31(1):114–128.  https://doi.org/10.25260/ea.21.31.1.0.1230Google Scholar

30.

Guo Q, Rejmanek M, Wen J . 2012. Geographical, socioeconomic, and ecological determinants of exotic plant naturalization in the United States: Insights and updates from improved data. NeoBiota 12:41–55.  https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.12.2419Google Scholar

31.

Higgs E. 2017. Novel and designed ecosystems. Restoration Ecology 25(1):8–13.  https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12410Google Scholar

32.

Hughes AC, Orr MC, Ma K, Costello MJ, Waller J, Provoost P, Yang Q, Zhu C, Qiao H . 2021. Sampling biases shape our view of the natural world. Ecography 44(9):1259–1269.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.05926Google Scholar

33.

Hulme PE. 2009. Trade, transport and trouble: Managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization. Journal of Applied Ecology 46(1):10–18.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01600.xGoogle Scholar

34.

Jimenez YG, Aráoz E, Grau HR, Paolini L . 2021. Linking forest transition, plant invasion and forest succession theories: Socioeconomic drivers and composition of new subtropical Andean forests. Landscape Ecology 36(4):1161–1176.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-021-01192-zGoogle Scholar

35.

Jimenez YG, Grau HR, Fernandez RD, Ceballos SJ, Blundo C, Malizia A, Carilla J, Osinaga Acosta O, Aráoz E . 2023. The role of species composition in montane reforested areas to offset carbon emissions. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment 32:101024.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2023.101024Google Scholar

36.

Kowarik I, von der Lippe M . 2008. Pathways in plant invasions. In : Nentwig W, editor. Biological Invasions. Ecological Studies Vol 193. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, pp 29–47.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-36920-2_3Google Scholar

37.

Li X, Zhou Y, Zhao M, Zhao X . 2020. A harmonized global nighttime light dataset 1992–2018. Scientific Data 7:168.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0510-yGoogle Scholar

38.

Lopez-Angulo J, Pescador DS, Sanchez AM, Mihoč MA, Cavieres LA, Escudero A . 2018. Determinants of high mountain plant diversity in the Chilean Andes: From regional to local spatial scales. PLOS ONE 13(7):e0200216.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200216Google Scholar

39.

Mack RN, Lonsdale WM . 2001. Humans as global plant dispersers: Getting more than we bargained for. Current introductions of species for aesthetic purposes present the largest single challenge for predicting which plant immigrants will become future pests. BioScience 51(2):95–102.  https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0095:HAGPDG]2.0.CO;2Google Scholar

40.

Marini L, Bertolli A, Bona E, Federici G, Martini F, Prosser F, Bommarco R . 2013. Beta-diversity patterns elucidate mechanisms of alien plant invasion in mountains. Global Ecology and Biogeography 22(4):450–460.  https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12006Google Scholar

41.

McKinney ML. 2006. Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biological Conservation 127(3):247–260.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.005Google Scholar

42.

Medina RG, Ponssa ML, Aráoz E . 2016. Environmental, land cover and land use constraints on the distributional patterns of anurans: Leptodacylus species (Anura, Leptodactylidae) from Dry Chaco. PeerJ 4:e2605.  https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2605Google Scholar

43.

Mehraj G, Khuroo AA, Qureshi S, Muzafar I, Friedman CR, Rashid I . 2018. Patterns of alien plant diversity in the urban landscapes of global biodiversity hotspots: A case study from the Himalayas. Biodiversity and Conservation 27(5):1055–1072.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1478-6Google Scholar

44.

Michonneau F, Collins M . 2017. ridigbio: Interface to the iDigBio Data API. R package version 0.3.5.  https://CRAN.R-project.org/package5ridigbio; accessed on 17 February 2023. Google Scholar

45.

Morales CL, Aizen MA . 2002. Does invasion of exotic plants promote invasion of exotic flower visitors? A case study from the temperate forests of the southern Andes. Biological Invasions 4(1):87–100.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020513012689Google Scholar

46.

Naeem S, Knops JM, Tilman D, Howe KM, Kennedy T, Gale S . 2000. Plant diversity increases resistance to invasion in the absence of covarying extrinsic factors. Oikos 91:97–108. Google Scholar

47.

Nanni AS, Gasparri NI, Grau HR . 2015. Redistribution of forest biomass in an heterogeneous environment of subtropical Andes undergoing agriculture adjustment. Applied Geography 62:107–114.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.04.012Google Scholar

48.

Nievas RP, Calderon MR, Moglia MM . 2019. Environmental factors affecting the success of exotic plant invasion in a wildland–urban ecotone in temperate South America. Neotropical Biology and Conservation 14(2):257–274.  https://doi.org/10.3897/neotropical.14.e37633Google Scholar

49.

Nuñez MA, Pauchard A . 2010. Biological invasions in developing and developed countries: Does one model fit all? Biological Invasions 12(4):707–714.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9517-1Google Scholar

50.

Ossola A, Hoeppner MJ, Burley HM, Gallagher RV, Beaumont LJ, Leishman MR . 2020. The Global Urban Tree Inventory: A database of the diverse tree flora that inhabits the world's cities. Global Ecology and Biogeography 29(11):1907–1914.  https://doiorg/101111/geb13169 Google Scholar

51.

Parés-Ramos IK, Álvarez-Berríós NL, Aide TM . 2013. Mapping urbanization dynamics in major cities of Colombia, Ecuador, Perú, and Bolivia using night-time satellite imagery. Land 2(1):37–59.  https://doi.org/10.3390/land2010037Google Scholar

52.

Pauchard A, Kueffer C, Dietz H, Daehler CC, Alexander J, Edwards PJ, Arévalo JR, Cavieres LA, Guisan A, Haider S , et al. 2009. Ain't no mountain high enough: Plant invasions reaching new elevations. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7(9):479–486.  https://doi.org/10.1890/080072Google Scholar

53.

Pauchard A, Milbau A, Albihn A, Alexander J, Burgess T, Daehler C, Englund G, Essl F, Evengård B, Greenwood GB , et al. 2016. Non-native and native organisms moving into high elevation and high latitude ecosystems in an era of climate change: New challenges for ecology and conservation. Biological Invasions 18(2):345–353.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-015-1025-xGoogle Scholar

54.

Payne D, Snethlage M, Geschke J, Spehn EM, Fischer M . 2020. Nature and people in the Andes, East African mountains, European Alps, and Hindu Kush Himalaya: Current research and future directions. Mountain Research and Development 40(2):A1–A14.  https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-19-00075.1Google Scholar

55.

Pemberton RW, Liu H . 2009. Marketing time predicts naturalization of horticultural plants. Ecology 90(1):69–80.  https://doi.org/10.1890/071516.1Google Scholar

56.

Pérez-Escobar OA, Zizka A, Bermúdez MA, Meseguer AS, Condamine FL, Hoorn C, Hooghiemstra H, Pu Y, Bogarín D, Boschman LM , et al. 2022. The Andes through time: evolution and distribution of Andean floras. Trends in Plant Science 27(4):364–378.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2021.09.010Google Scholar

57.

R Core Development Team. 2021. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.  https://www.R-project.org/ ; accessed on 15 December 2022. Google Scholar

58.

Ramírez MC. 2012. Internal Migration Pattern at Local Level in Colombia: An Approach From the 1993 and 2005 Censuses. Paper presented at XXVII International Union for the Scientific Study of Population (IUSSP) International Population Conference, Busan, Republic of Korea, 28 August 2013. Aubervilliers, France: International Union for the Scientific Study of Population.  https://iussp.org/sites/default/files/event_call_for_papers/Article%20Migration%20Colombia%20(IUSSP).pdf; accessed on 15 September 2023. Google Scholar

59.

Reichard SH, White P . 2001. Horticulture as a pathway of invasive plant introductions in the United States: Most invasive plants have been introduced for horticultural use by nurseries, botanical gardens, and individuals. BioScience 51(2):103–113.  https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0103:HAAPOI]2.0.CO;2Google Scholar

60.

Ribeiro BR, Velazco SJE, Guidoni-Martins K, Tessarolo G, Jardim L, Bachman SP, Loyola R . 2022. bdc: A toolkit for standardizing, integrating and cleaning biodiversity data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution (MEE) 13(7):1421–1428.  https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13868Google Scholar

61.

Royuela V, Ordóñez J . 2018. Internal migration in a developing country: A panel data analysis of Ecuador (1982–2010). Papers in Regional Science 97(2):345–367.  https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12251Google Scholar

62.

Salisbury A, al-Beidh S, Armitage JO, Bird S, Bostock H, Platoni AM, Tatchell M, Thompson KA, Perry JN . 2017. Enhancing gardens as habitats for plant-associated invertebrates: Should we plant native or exotic species? Biodiversity and Conservation 26:2657–2673. Google Scholar

63.

Sax DF, Gaines SD . 2008. Species invasions and extinction: The future of native biodiversity on islands. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(supplement 1):11490–11497.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0802290105Google Scholar

64.

Schultz C. 2014. World Migration Report. Migration, Health, and Cities. Migration, Health and Urbanization: Interrelated Challenges. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Migration [IOM]. Google Scholar

65.

Seebens H, Kaplan E . 2022. DASCO: A workflow to downscale alien species checklists using occurrence records and to re-allocate species distributions across realms. NeoBiota 91:75–91.  https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.74.81082Google Scholar

66.

Seto KC, Güneralp B, Hutyra LR . 2012. Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109(40):16083–16088.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211658109Google Scholar

67.

Sjöman H, Morgenroth J, Sjöman JD, Sæbø A, Kowarik I . 2016. Diversification of the urban forest: Can we afford to exclude exotic tree species? Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 18:237–241.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.06.011Google Scholar

68.

Spear D, Foxcroft LC, Bezuidenhout H, McGeoch MA . 2013. Human population density explains alien species richness in protected areas. Biological Conservation 159:137–147.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.11.022Google Scholar

69.

Stadel C. 2000. Ciudades medianas y aspectos de la sustentabilidad urbana en la región andina. Revista Geográfica 12(12):25–43. Google Scholar

70.

Stampella PC, Lambaré DA, Hilgert NI, Pochettino ML . 2013. What the Iberian conquest bequeathed to us: The fruit trees introduced in Argentine subtropic: Their history and importance in present traditional medicine. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2013:868394.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/868394Google Scholar

71.

Symonds MRE, Moussalli A . 2010. A brief guide to model selection, multimodel inference and model averaging in behavioural ecology using Akaike's information criterion. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 65:13–21. Google Scholar

72.

Thiers B, Pirani JR, Nelson G, Miller J, Maia L, Imperatriz-Fonseca VL, Bustamante M, Almeida E, Canhos D, De Giovanni R , et al. 2022. speciesLink: Rich data and novel tools for digital assessments of biodiversity. Biota Neotropica 22:20221394.  https://doi.org/10.1590/1676-0611-BN-2022-1394Google Scholar

73.

Thuiller W, Richardson DM, Rouget M, Procheş Ş , Wilson JRU . 2006. Interactions between environment, species traits, and human uses describe patterns of plant invasions. Ecology 87(7):1755–1769.  https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1755:IBESTA]2.0.CO;2Google Scholar

74.

Tovar C, Carril AF, Gutiérrez AG, Ahrends A, Fita L, Zaninelli P, Flombaum P, Abarzúa AM, Alarcón D, Aschero V , et al. 2022. Understanding climate change impacts on biome and plant distributions in the Andes: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Biogeography 49(8):1420–1442.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.14389Google Scholar

75.

Vicente J, Alves P, Randin C, Guisan A, Honrado J . 2010. What drives invisibility? A multi-model inference test and spatial modelling of alien plant species richness patterns in northern Portugal. Ecography 33(6):1081–1092.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.6380.xGoogle Scholar

76.

Vrieze SI. 2012. Model selection and psychological theory: A discussion of the differences between the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC). Psychological Methods 17(2):228. Google Scholar

77.

World Bank. n.d. Low & Middle Income Data. Washington, DC: World Bank.  https://data.worldbank.org/income-level/low-and-middle-income?most_recent_value_desc5false; accessed on 25 February 2023. Google Scholar

78.

Yang J, La Sorte FA, Pyšek P, Yan P, Nowak D, Mcbride J . 2015. The compositional similarity of urban forests among the world's cities is scale dependent. Global Ecology and Biogeography 24(12):1413–1423.  https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12376Google Scholar

Appendices

Supplemental material

 TABLE S1 (Gonzalez_MRD2023_Supplemental_material_Tables1-2.pdf) Comparative analysis of performance scores among top regression models.

 TABLE S2 (Gonzalez_MRD2023_Supplemental_material_Tables1-2.pdf) Estimation of mean and range for the set of predictor variables employed.

Found at:  https://doi.org/10.1659/mrd.2023.00017.S1

Maríá Virginia González, Lia Montti, Yohana G. Jimenez, and Ezequiel Aráoz "Linking Migration Flows With the Prevalence of Exotic Plant Species in the Andes," Mountain Research and Development 44(1), R1-R9, (5 March 2024). https://doi.org/10.1659/mrd.2023.00017
Received: 17 May 2023; Accepted: 1 December 2023; Published: 5 March 2024
KEYWORDS
Andes
exotic woody plants
human migration
nighttime lights
urban growth
Back to Top