Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
31 July 2006 Extralimital Fossils of the “Gondwanan” Family Sphaeropsocidae (Insecta: Psocodea)
David Grimaldi, Michael S. Engel
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Two new species and genera of minute, coleopteriform psocopterans, family Sphaeropsocidae (Nanopsocetae), are described from fossils preserved in Cretaceous ambers: Sphaeropsocoides canadensis Grimaldi and Engel, n.gen., n.sp., from the Campanian of western Canada; and Sphaeropsocites lebanensis Grimaldi and Engel, n.gen., n.sp., from the Neocomian of Lebanon. These are the first described Mesozoic species of the family. Sphaeropsocus kuenowii Hagen in mid-Eocene Baltic amber is redescribed in detail. The 14 described Recent species of the family (in the genera Sphaeropsocopsis and Badonnelia ) have natural distributions that are largely restricted to southern portions of the Southern Hemisphere, but Eocene and now Cretaceous fossils reveal a formerly global distribution of the family. Hypothesized relationships of the five genera indicate basal positions of the fossil genera, and probably an entirely Tertiary age of the Recent genera Sphaeropsocopsis and Badonnelia, which would thus be too young for these two genera to have been affected by gondwanan drift.

Introduction

Breeding amidst the humus of southern temperate forests are minute, beetlelike insects with elytriform forewings, which are the Sphaeropsocidae, coelacanths of the Psocoptera. Like coelacanths, these were first known as fossils, but in this case exquisitely preserved in mid-Eocene Baltic amber (Hagen, 1882: fig. 1). Living relatives were not discovered until the early 1930s (again like coelacanths), some 50 years later, based on a species from Tasmania (Hickman, 1934). That Tasmanian species, Sphaeropsocus recens Hickman, was later transferred to a new but obviously closely related genus, Sphaeropsocopsis, along with four Recent species from Chile, Argentina, and Ascension Island (Badonnel, 1962, 1963). Since that time four additional Recent Sphaeropsocopsis species have been discovered from Chile, Angola, and St. Helena Island in the southern Atlantic (Badonnel, 1967, 1971, 1972; Camousseight and New, 1994; Lienhard and Ashmole, 2000). The closely related Recent genus Badonnelia contains four species from Chile (Badonnel, 1963, 1967, 1972; Camousseight and New, 1994) and one species is widespread throughout Europe, B. titei Pearman (reviewed in Lienhard and Smithers, 2002). With the possible exception of a putative but as yet undescribed Sphaeropsocopsis from California (Mockford, 1993) and B. titei, both of which are plausibly introduced, the Recent Sphaeropsocidae are essentially or even entirely a gondwanan group. Yet the Baltic amber species indicates these insects roamed far into the Northern Hemisphere during at least the Eocene.

Here we further document the former global spread of Sphaeropsocidae by describing the first Cretaceous species, from the Early Cretaceous of Lebanon and Late Cretaceous of western Canada. This is an appropriate opportunity to also redescribe Sphaeropsocus kuenowii Hagen, based on detailed examination of the type and of new material, and to consider relationships of the five genera.

Materials and Methods

Some amber pieces were prepared according to the protocols described by Nascimbene and Silverstein (2000), particularly the more fractured and brittle Cretaceous pieces. This involved preliminary trimming and grinding, then embedding the pieces in a very durable epoxy, and finally trimming, grinding, and polishing (often within less than one millimeter of the inclusion) so that the inclusion could be studied with compound microscopy at 100–400×. The Lebanese amber specimen in this study was collected in the 1970s by Aftim and Fadi Acra from near Jezzine and dates to approximately 120–125 Ma (Azar, 2000). The Canadian amber specimen was collected by J.F. McAlpine and J.E.H. Martin (1969) in the 1960s from near Cedar Lake, Manitoba, in outcrops of the Campanian-aged Foremost Formation (ca. 75–80 Ma). Baltic amber derives from vast deposits of the blaue Erde in northern Europe, which is mid-Eocene in age, ca. 45 Ma (Kosmowska-Ceranowicz, 1987; Ritzkowski, 1997).

Institutions that are repositories for the material examined are the following:

  • AMNH  American Museum of Natural History, New York, Division of Invertebrate Zoology (Acra Collection of Lebanese amber)

    CNC  Canadian National Collection of Insects and Spiders, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Ontario; courtesy of Dr. Jeff Cumming

    MCZ  Museum of Comparative Zoology, Department of Entomology, Harvard University, Cambridge MA; courtesy of Dr. Phil Perkins

    NHM  Natural History Museum, London, Department of Palaeontology; courtesy of Dr. Andrew J. Ross

    KU  Snow Entomological Collection, Division of Entomology, University of Kansas Natural History Museum, Lawrence

The following abbreviations are used herein for the various genera in the family so as to avoid confusion when discussing them together in condensed form: Sphaeropsocus (S.), Sphaeropsocopsis (Sp.), Sphaeropsocoides (Sd.), and Sphaeropsocites (Si.).

Systematics

Family Sphaeropsocidae Kolbe

Sphaeropsocini Kolbe, 1883: 190. Type genus: SphaeropsocusHagen, 1882. Handlirsch, 1907: 702 [elevated to familial rank]; Menon, 1942: 24; Pearman, 1958: 52; Bekker-Migdisova and Vishniakova, 1962: 230; Mockford, 1993: 63.

Diagnosis

Minute, prognathous psocopterans (ca. 1.0 mm in body length); forewings of female elytriform (male micropterous), with reduced venation and fine to coarse punctation or areolation; hind wings absent; coxae closely situated; compound eyes with 0–10 ommatidia; ocelli absent.

Included Genera

Sphaeropsocopsis Badonnel (nine Recent species: Chile, Angola, Tasmania, St. Helena Is.), Badonnelia Pearman (five Recent species: Chile, Europe), Sphaeropsocus Hagen (Baltic amber), Sphaeropsocites n.gen. (Lebanese amber), and Sphaeropsocoides n.gen. (Canadian amber). Another fossil, perhaps the fourth fossil species, is preserved in amber from the Late Cenomanian-aged Dolganian Formation (ca. 93–94 Ma) of the Taimyr Peninsula, Siberia (Rasnitsyn and Quicke, 2002: fig. 164), currently being studied elsewhere.

Comments

Most psocopteran systematists attribute the family name to Menon (1942), but it was actually validated much earlier by Kolbe (1883) as a tribe and subsequently applied by Handlirsch (1907) as a family. The family belongs to the Nanopsocetae,3 which is presently known to consist of a monophyletic lineage that also contains the Pachytroctidae, the Liposcelididae, and the lice (order Phthiraptera4). This grouping is based on morphology (Pearman, 1936) and DNA sequences (Johnson et al., 2004). Pachytroctidae is a family of 10 genera and approximately 90 described species, whose natural distribution is circumtropical and warm temperate. Liposcelididae is a family of one extinct and nine Recent genera with 181 described species, most of which are in the familiar genus of “book lice,” Liposcelis. The most interesting aspect of the Liposcelididae is that they are the sister group to the true, ectoparasitic lice (Lyal, 1985; Yoshizawa and Johnson, 2003). The fossil record of lice is virtually nonexistent, but like the Sphaeropsocidae all the fossils of Liposcelididae are preserved in amber. A recent study of fossil Liposcelididae indicates an origin of the family and probable divergence from the lice in the Early Cretaceous or possibly latest Jurassic (Grimaldi and Engel, 2005b), which is an age that corresponds well with the fossil record of Sphaeropsocidae that we report here.

Genus Sphaeropsocus Hagen

Sphaeropsocus Hagen, 1882: 226. Type species: Sphaeropsocus kuenowii Hagen, 1882, by monotypy.

Palaeotroctes Enderlein, 1911: 350. Type species: Atropos succinica Hagen, 1882, by monotypy. Synonymy vide Pearman, 1958: 51.

Diagnosis

(modified from Badonnel, 1963; Smithers, 1972; Mockford, 1993). Distinguished from Badonnelia on the basis of less reduced venation of the female forewings (vide Badonnelia, infra); distinguished from Sphaeropsocopsis by not having the apices of Rs, M, or Cu fused; from Sphaeropsocites by having P4 not swollen, eyes distant from posterior margin of head, M and Rs not fused, and no crossveins; from Sphaeropsocoides by having very short to virtually no stems for R, M, and Cu, and tibiae without apical spurs.

Sphaeropsocus kuenowii Hagen Figures 1, 2a–d, 3, 4

Sphaeropsocus künowii Hagen, 1882: 226. In Baltic amber. Name emended to kuenowii in accordance with ICZN (1999: Art. 32.5.2.1).

Atropos succinica Hagen, 1882: 231. Synonymy vide Pearman, 1958: 51.

Troctes succinicus (Hagen); Kolbe, 1883: 190.

Palaeotroctes succinicus (Hagen); Enderlein, 1911: 350.

Sphaeropsocus künowi Enderlein, 1911: 352. Lapsus calami pro Sphaeropsocus kuenowiiHagen, 1882.

Diagnosis

As for genus (vide supra).

Description

(Female) (measurements based on KU B-144): Minute psocopteran, body length sans forewings ca. 0.60 mm, with forewings 1.0 mm. Head: Prognathous; broad, width 0.8× the length. Anterior tentorial pits short, sulcuslike, convergent just above clypeus; tentorium well-developed, with tentorial bridge and anterior tentorial arms; median “coronal suture” extended from posterior margin of head to level of eyes. Ocelli absent. Compound eyes small, with seven facets not contacting each other. Clypeus of modest size; mandibles large; labial palps highly reduced (pair of small 1-segmented polyps on anterior margin of labium), area between labium and occipital foramen membranous. Maxillary palps 4-segmented, lengths of segments (longest to shortest): P4-2-3-1. Apical palpomere (P4) spindle-shaped, apical half with oval sensillar area on ventral surface. Right lacinia protrudent, apex with one small and two large teeth. Antenna length 10.5 mm; scape and pedicel twice width of flagellomeres, approximately half the length of basal flagellomere. Flagellum with 13–14 articles, each flagellomere with fine annuli, and all but basal flagellomere with sparse setulae.

Thorax: Short, dorsally with only pronotum and mesoscutum exposed. Legs of moderate length, ca. 0.60–0.65 mm. Coxae large, opposites of each pair nearly touching medially; procoxae larger than metathoracic pair. Femora thick, width of profemur 3.5× width of protibia, of metafemur 2.7× width of metatibia; profemoral length 0.18 mm; metafemoral length 0.25 mm. All tibiae approximately equal in length (0.20 mm) and width; no apical spurs present. Tarsi trimerous, total length 0.13 mm; basal tarsomere slightly longer than others; pretarsal claw with preapical tooth. Wings: Forewings present only (hind wings absent); forewing elytrous, carapacelike, length 0.67 mm, greatest width 0.38 mm; anterior margin cordate. Surface of wing between veins areolate, with dense, irregular depressions. Venation highly reduced, consisting of: circumambient C, R and Rs, MA and MP, Cu, and very short A (for proportions see fig. 3). Stem of R and M very short, but length variable even between wings of same specimen. Surface of veins minutely papillate, devoid of areolae. Apices of veins not reaching margin of wings. Outer margin of wing with row of minute, stiff setulae. Wings meet in straight line for approximately half their mesal length; divergent mesally in apical half.

Abdomen: Short, globose, approximately same size as head, dorsally obscured by forewings, ventrally exposing little or very obscure segmentation. Apical half of abdomen ventrally covered with large subgenital plate; plate with posterior margin entire (not bilobed or emarginate). In KU B-144 subgenital plate lifted, exposing what appears to be two opposing brushes of fine setulae and pocked surface of cuticle.

Holotype

MCZ 235 (fig. 2a), “no. 103” in handwriting [presumably Hagen's]. Specimen was preserved in a square chip of amber that was heavily crazed and darkened to a very deep red from years of exposure (it was originally mounted between a piece of folded paper that was then pinned, and may have originally been stored in a pinned collection). The piece was embedded in epoxy at the AMNH and ground and polished in order to expose fresh surface for viewing critical details.

Additional Material Examined

KU B-144, -148, -154, all of which are preserved in middle Eocene Baltic amber from Germany, as well as a specimen preserved in Late Eocene amber from the Rovno region of the Ukraine (Engel and Perkovsky, 2006a, 2006b).

Comments

This species has been referred to frequently in literature on insect fossils, and illustrations of it often reproduced and refigured (e.g., Badonnel, 1951; Carpenter, 1992) (fig. 1). Despite this, and the fact it is not particularly rare in Baltic amber, this intriguing species has never been redescribed in detail. We have found that Hagen's original illustration (fig. 1a) and description are remarkably accurate, which we can modify only slightly. The short vein A of the forewing is not present in the type specimen, and in other specimens A branches off at the very base of the stem of M + Cu, not off of Cu as depicted by other authors. Also, the longitudinal veins are incomplete and do not reach the wing margin.

Genus Sphaeropsocopsis Badonnel

Sphaeropsocopsis Badonnel, 1963: 322. Type species: Sphaeropsocopsis chilensis Badonnel, 1963, by original designation.

Diagnosis

Modified from Badonnel (1967, 1971, 1972), Smithers (1972), and Mockford (1993): (Female) Forewings with 4–5 main longitudinal veins (generally missing MP), apices of at least Rs, M, and Cu fused distally (but distant from wing margin); wing membrane finely and densely areolate; maxillary palpomere 4 (P4) fusiform; female terminalia with V3 deeply lobed.

Included Species

There are nine described species in the genus, all of them Recent. Five of the species are known only from Chile: Sp. chilensis Badonnel, 1963; Sp. microps Badonnel, 1963 (specimens “cf. microps” are also reported from Ascension Island in the mid-Atlantic); Sp. spinosa Badonnel, 1972; Sp. valdiviensis Badonnel, 1972; and Sp. valeriae Badonnel, 1967. Sphaeropsocopsis argentina (Badonnel, 1962) occurs in Argentina (but has also been introduced into the United States; see Relationships and Biogeography, below); Sp. recens occurs in Tasmania and southeastern Australia (Hickman, 1934); Sp. riesi Badonnel, 1972 occurs in Angola; and there is a blind cave species on St. Helena Island (Sp. myrtleae Lienhard and Ashmole, 1999). Sphaeropscopsis myrtleae was placed into this genus only on the basis of undivided mesothoracic sternites and eye reduction; the brachypterous forewings are so reduced as to obscure whether they possessed the characteristic venation and areolae.

Mockford (1993) mentioned a possible Sphaeropsocus from California, known only from three ♀ specimens representing possibly two species, but which may be a Sphaeropsocopsis. According to Mockford (1993: pg. 64) these specimens have six veins “including Cu2, but Cu1 is simple and joins M2 distally” (this last feature diagnostic of Sphaeropsocopsis). Given that one species from Argentina, Sp. argentina (Badonnel, 1962), has been introduced into the United States, it is quite possible that the California specimens were also from an introduced population.

Genus Badonnelia Pearman

Badonnelia Pearman, 1953: 262. Type species: Badonnelia titei Pearman, 1953, by original designation.

Diagnosis

Distinguished from Sphaeropsocopsis entirely on the basis of apomorphic features: Forewings also elytrous but bent down at sides of abdomen, with only two main veins and “hexagonal pattern of ridges.” Compound eye with seven ommatidia (vs. “variable”). Cuticle of body with fine granular microsculpture. Fourth maxillary palpal segment (P4) subcylindrical, elongate (vs. “fusiform”).

Included Species

There are five described species, the first four of which are from Chile: B. castrii Badonnel, 1963; B. granulosa Badonnel, 1972; B. similis Badonnel, 1963; B. testacea Badonnel, 1972; and B. titei. Badonnelia titei is widespread throughout western Europe, from the UK to Finland and Sweden, and to Switzerland, but probably introduced to that area.

Comments

As diagnosed this genus would appear to render Sphaeropscopsis paraphyletic, since it is defined entirely on the basis of characters that are apomorphic with respect to these genera. Before any formal synonymy of genera is proposed it would be important to examine the detailed morphology of as many Recent species of sphaeropsocids as possible. Such a study should also determine the exact relationship of B. titei to the other (austral) species of the genus, although based on published descriptions it appears to be typical of other species in the genus.

It must be seriously considered that B. titei is a species as yet unknown from Chile or which is a senior synonym of one of the four species described by Badonnel, but which was introduced to western Europe. Thus far, the species is known from Belgium, Finland, Great Britain, Ireland, Luxembourg, Norway, Sweden, and Switzerland. A Europe-Chile disjunction is an extremely unusual distribution for any group of organisms, particularly for a group that we hypothesize as very young and derived from a naturally austral group (Sphaeropsocopsis). Most significant is that published anecdotes reveal the “librophilous” nature of B. titei and how it is easily spread by humans. O'Connor (1987), for example, documented how B. titei was received in a shipment of books to Scotland, and even the type specimen of the species was found in the binding of an old atlas in the museum at Tring, England (Pearman, 1953)! (Full citation of the “type locality” was not specified, but apparently it was not the page with a map of Chile). We believe that Badonnelia is probably naturally endemic to Chile.

Sphaeropsocoides Grimaldi and Engel, new genus

Type Species

Sphaeropsocoides canadensis, new species, in Cretaceous Canadian amber.

Diagnosis

Anterior margin of forewing slightly less cordate than in Recent genera. Venation most similar to that of Sphaeropsocus, with five main veins, their apices not meeting wing margin (but closer to margin in Sphaeropscoides) nor apically fused; and with stem of R, stem of M, and Cu slightly longer. Antennal flagellum with 12 segments (vs. 13–14); tibia with two apical spurs; pretarsal claw with small preapical tooth.

Etymology

Base of the name is from the type genus of the family, and the suffix -oides from the Greek -eides or -eidos, meaning “like” or “having the form of”.

Sphaeropsocoides canadensis Grimaldi and Engel, new species Figures 2f–g, 5

Diagnosis

As for genus (see above).

Description

(Female) (measurements based on holotype, CNC 642): Minute psocopteran, body length with forewings 0.97 mm. Body somewhat compressed, so proportions are probably slightly distorted. Head: Prognathous; broad, width approximately equal to length. Anterior tentorial pits unapparent; pair of long, fine setae on anterior margin of head; median “coronal suture” extended from posterior margin of head to level of anterior margin of eyes. Ocelli absent. Compound eyes small, with approximately six facets not contacting each other [difficult to discern]. Clypeus of modest size; labial palpi visible in CNC 644, a pair of small lobes on anterior margin of labium [paraglossae?]; fine, stiff setae on margins, with 1 thick seta at apex of palp having slightly bifid apex. Maxillary palp 4-segmented, lengths of palpomeres (longest to shortest): P4-2-3-1. Apical palpomere (P4) narrow ovoid to spindle-shaped, apical half with dark area, presumably sensillar area. Palpomeres P2 and P3 each with lateral patch of dense microtrichia (presumably sensilla). Lacinia protrudent, length equal to that of P4, apex with one small and two large teeth. Antenna length 8.1 mm; scape and pedicel twice width of flagellomeres, slightly longer than half the length of basal flagellomere. Flagellum with 12 articles, each flagellomere with fine annuli.

Thorax: Short, dorsally with only pronotum and mesoscutum exposed. [Leg lengths and other proportions difficult to discern], ca. 0.60–0.65 mm. Tibiae with pair of small apical spurs, length of spurs approximately equal to width of tibia. Tarsi trimerous, total length 0.13 mm; basal tarsomere slightly longer than others; basal and second tarsomere each with small apical spur; pretarsal claw with preapical tooth. Wings: Forewings present only (hind wings absent); forewing elytrous, carapacelike, length 0.60 mm, greatest width 0.31 mm; anterior margin slightly cordate. Surface of wing between veins areolate, with dense, irregular depressions. Venation highly reduced, consisting of: circumambient C, short R and Rs, MA and MP, Cu, and very short A (for proportions see fig. 4a). Stem of R short; stem of M approximately twice the length. Surface of veins devoid of areolae. Apices of veins barely touching margin of wings. Outer margin of wing with row of minute, evenly-spaced, stiff setulae. Wings meet in straight line for slightly less than half their mesal length; divergent mesally in apical half.

Abdomen: Obscured by forewings and by distortion from compression in holotype. Subgenital plate large, shape of posterior margin typical of family (entire, not bilobed or emarginate).

Type Material

Holotype CNC 642, which is slightly compressed dorsoventrally (especially the head and abdomen). Paratype CNC 644, which displays some details very well (fig. 4b), but those fragments of the body that are preserved are greatly compressed. Forewings of the holotype specimen are fortuitously cleared, which confirmed that the hind wings are indeed absent.

Etymology

The specific epithet is based on Canada, the country of origin.

Comments

This species appears to be an extinct sister group to Sphaeropsocus and Sphaeropsocopsis, based on the following plesiomorphic features: presence of apical tibial spurs, the palpal segmentation, shape of the anterior margin of the wing, and the long R and M stems.

Sphaeropsocites Grimaldi and Engel, new genus

Type Species

Sphaeropsocites lebanensis, new species, in Early Cretaceous Lebanese amber.

Diagnosis

Apomorphically distinguished from all other genera of the family by palpomere P4 swollen; clypeus very large; eyes situated very posteriad on head; each forewing virtually hemispherical in shape (inner margins touching for entire length, not divergent apically); vein M short and fused to middle of Rs; course of all veins converging towards mesal margin of wing. Plesiomorphically distinguished from all other genera by non-cordate shape (lack of humeral arc) on wing base, by fine punctation (vs. areolate surface) on forewing, and less reduced venation: Rs apically branched, crossveins between R-Rs and M-Cu, incomplete crossvein between R and C, vein A long, slight claval furrow present.

Etymology

Base of the name is from the type genus of the family, and the suffix -ites is directly from the Greek, meaning “like” or “in the nature of”.

Sphaeropsocites lebanensis Grimaldi and Engel, new species Figures 2e, 6

Diagnosis

As for genus (see above).

Description

(Female) (measurements based on unique holotype): Minute psocopteran, body length with forewings 0.83 mm. Head: Prognathous; very broad, width 1.2× the length. Anterior tentorial pits not apparent (probably not present); median “coronal suture” very short, extended from posterior margin to only level of posterior margin of eyes. Ocelli absent. Compound eyes small, situated very close to posterior margin of head, with six to seven facets not contacting each other. Clypeus large and bulbous; mandibles, labium, lacinia, and base of maxillary palps not visible. Apical palpomere (P4) clavate, apical surface with field of dense sensilla. Apex of antenna obscure [total length and number of flagellomeres unknown]; scape and pedicel twice the width of flagellomeres, approximately half the length of basal flagellomere.

Thorax: Short, dorsally with only collarlike pronotum and narrower mesoscutum exposed. Femora and most of forelegs exposed; forelegs of moderate length; femora thick, width of pro- and metafemora 3× the width of respective tibiae. Lengths of pro- and mesotibiae 0.23 mm; apical tibial spurs apparently absent. Tarsi trimerous, total length 0.17 mm; basal tarsomere much longer than others (1.5× the length of tarsomeres 2+3); pretarsal claw with preapical tooth. Wings: Forewings present only; (hind wings absent); forewing elytrous, carapacelike, hemispherical in shape, length 0.57 mm, greatest width 0.29 mm; anterior margin not cordate but slightly emarginate. Wings meet mesally in straight line for nearly entire length; divergent only in proximal 1/7 of wing length. Surface of wing between veins with dense, fine areolation or punctation. Venation less reduced than other species of family, consisting of: circumambient C; R; Rs, to which at midlength is fused a short M; Cu, diverging from stem of Rs and M, and A (for proportions see fig. 6). Rs apically branched, crossveins present between R-Rs and M-Cu, an incomplete crossvein between R and C. Vein A long, slight claval suture present and parallel to A. Surface of veins devoid of areolae. Course of all veins directed towards mesal margin of wing, but not touching wing margin. Outer margin of wing without row of minute, stiff setulae.

Abdomen: Short, globose, approximately same length as forewings but slightly narrower [dorsally obscured by forewings, ventrally by debris].

Holotype

AMNH JS284, collected by Aftim and Fadi Acra from near Jezzine, Lebanon (Early Cretaceous). The piece also contains two male Chironomidae (Diptera). It is dark orange and occluded with fractures, debris, and a network of fine, rootlike plant inclusions. Observation was facilitated by embedding the piece in epoxy, sectioning it, then trimming and grinding close to the insect, but a ventral view of the holotype is still obscured by layers and fractures. Forewings of the holotype are fortuitously cleared, which confirmed that hind wings are indeed absent.

Etymology

The specific epithet is a reference to Lebanon, the country of origin for this species.

Comments

Despite the unusual, specialized features of this species, a venation that is least incomplete indicates this species is probably a sister group to all other sphaeropsocids, Recent and extinct.

Key to Genera of sphaeropsocidae

  1. 1 Forewings separated at midline in apical third or quarter; anal vein absent or reduced to short stub near wing base (fig. 3); crossveins absent

  2. – Forewings meeting at midline for entire length; anal vein distinct and elongate, running along claval suture to near posterior wing margin (fig. 6); crossveins present

  3. 2 Anal vein of forewing present as short stub near wing base

  4. – Anal vein of forewing completely absent

  5. 3 Humeral angle of forewing distinctly chordate; stem of M greatly shortened

  6. – Humeral angle of forewing present but not enlarged; stem of M well developed

  7. 4 Forewings with distinct venation, although in brachypterous forms veins are reduced and greatly desclerotized (e.g., Sp. myrtleae); humeral angle chordate, sometimes weakly so

  8. – Forewing without venation, strongly arched dorsally and extending ventrally on sides to form tear-dropped carapace; humeral angle entirely reduced and tapering gently along wing length

Relationships and Biogeography

A preliminary cladogram of sphaeropsocid relationships is provided in figure 7, based on all fossil and living genera and 16 morphological characters (excluding ones defining the family) (table 1). All characters are entirely consistent with each other (there is apparently no homoplasy), so there was no need for a data matrix and digital analysis. As recently found with the closely related family Liposcelididae (Grimaldi and Engel, 2005b), there is a perfect correlation between the chronology of fossils and the branching sequence of the cladogram.

The oldest fossil of the family, Si. lebanensis in Early Cretaceous amber, branches off first. Despite unusual, autapomorphic features of this species, it possesses an array of features that are plesiomorphic to all other species of the family. These features include a forewing humeral area that is not expanded, wings that meet medially for their entire length, an enlarged vertex, and venation: vein A is present and is least reduced among all known species, a claval suture is present, and crossveins (three in number) are present. Tibial apices of Si. lebanensis are obscure, but spurs are possibly present. The species that branches off next is Sd.canadensis in Late Cretaceous Canadian amber. It lacks the large (i.e., cordate-shaped) humeral angle of the more derived species, and it has a pair of small tibial spurs on the apices of at least the fore and mid tibiae. The undescribed sphaeropsocid in mid-Cretaceous amber from Taimyr, Siberia (Rasnitsyn and Quicke, 2002: fig. 164) is still being studied elsewhere, so our comments are based entirely on the published photograph. Like Sphaeropsocus and Sphaeropsocoides in Baltic and Canadian amber (respectively), the Siberian amber specimen appears to lack crossveins, it has incomplete apices of the wing veins, and a fairly short stem to vein M. If this is the case, then it would be phylogenetically intermediate between the Baltic and Canadian amber species. Sphaeropsocus kuenowii in Baltic amber is the sister group to living species since it retains an anal vein (albeit a vestigial one). Sphaeropsocopsis microps is perhaps the most primitive Recent species since the apices of the forewing veins are not connected and so do not loop together near the wing margin. In lieu of detailed comparisons among the eight remaining species of the Recent Sphaeropsocopsis, relationships are as yet unresolved but this scheme does include a lineage that consists of the blind, troglobitic species from St. Helena Island, Sp. myrtleae, and Badonnelia. This putative sister-group relationship is based on reduced venation, lightly sclerotized wing veins, and reduction in the wing humeral area. As such, Sphaeropsocopsis appears to be paraphyletic with respect to Badonnelia. Badonnelia is clearly a very specialized and monophyletic group since the veins are entirely lost and the lateral parts of the forewings have grown down along the sides of the abdomen.

An understanding of relationships allows better interpretation of the interesting distribution of Sphaeropsocidae. It appears very likely that Recent species of the family are naturally gondwanan, since Sp. argentina has been introduced to the southern United States from Argentina, and it is quite possible that B. titei in Europe and a Sphaeropsocopsis from California were also introduced from Chile or Argentina (Mockford [1993] considered the California specimens to be Sphaeropsocus, but based on the revised definitions by the present authors this species belongs to Sphaeropsocopsis). If this is the case, then most Recent sphaeropsocids are actually austral. The Austral Region includes the temperate regions of southeastern Australia (including Tasmania), New Zealand, New Caledonia and the Fijian Islands, Chile and Argentina, and sometimes southernmost Africa. Taxa with distributions that have an austral disjunction are classically interpreted as relicts of gondwanan drift (Hennig, 1960; Brundin, 1966; summarized in Grimaldi and Engel, 2005a).

Laurasian fossil Sphaeropsocidae would appear to refute an hypothesis that Recent species of the family were affected by gondwanan drift (though Lebanon probably has a gondwanan origin). In fact, the Cretaceous and Eocene fossil sphaeropsocids comprise just stem groups to the Recent species. Extralimital fossils critically depend on the concept of Sphaeropsocidae, which in this case was expanded to include more primitive, extinct species. Grimaldi (1992) established criteria for when fossils can be used to interpret formerly more widespread distributions of Recent lineages, specifically that the fossils must belong to the crown group. Fossil Sphaeropsocidae do clearly establish, though, the possibility that Recent Sphaeropsocidae could have expanded their distribution outside of Recent ones at some time. More importantly, the phylogeny of the family indicates that the Recent genera Sphaeropsocopsis and Badonnelia (fig. 7) are probably entirely Tertiary in age and thus too young to have been affected by Cretaceous tectonics.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr. Edward L. Mockford for information on the undescribed sphaeropsocids collected by him in California in 1953, to Drs. Antonio Arillo and Arturo Baz for reviewing the manuscript, and to Drs. Jeff Cumming, Phil Perkins, and Andrew Ross for the loan of specimens. Partial support for this project was provided by NSF DEB-0542726 (to DG), NSF EF-0341724 (to MSE), and General Research Fund Allocation #2301360 of the University of Kansas Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology (to MSE).

References

1.

D. Azar 2000. Les Ambres Mésozoïques du Liban. Ph.D. dissertation, Orsay, France University of Paris. 202. Google Scholar

2.

A. Badonnel 1951. Ordre des Psocoptères (Psocoptera Psoquillae Latreille, 1810). In P.-P. Grassé (editor),. Traité de zoologie: anatomie, systématique, biologie [Tome X: Insectes supérieurs et hémiptéroïdes (Fascicule II)]: 1301–1340 Paris Masson. 976–1948. Google Scholar

3.

A. Badonnel 1962. Psocoptères. Biologie de l'Amérique Australe 1:185–229. Google Scholar

4.

A. Badonnel 1963. Psocoptères terricoles, lapidicoles et corticicoles du Chili. Biologie de l'Amérique Australe 2:291–338. Google Scholar

5.

A. Badonnel 1967. Psocoptères édaphiques du Chile (2e note). Biologie de l'Amérique Australe 3:541–585. Google Scholar

6.

A. Badonnel 1971. Sphaeropsocopsis reisi n. sp., premier représentant africain connu de la famille des Sphaeropsocidae (Psocoptera, Nanopsocetae), avec compléments à la faune des Psocoptères angolais. Publicações Culturais da Companhia de Diamantes de Angola 84:13–28. Google Scholar

7.

A. Badonnel 1972. Psocoptères édaphiques du Chile (3e note) (Insecta). Bulletin du Muséum National d'Histoire Centrale, Sciences Zoologiques 215:206–232. Google Scholar

8.

E. E. Bekker-Migdisova and V. N. Vishniakova . 1962. Order Psocoptera: Booklice (Corrodentia, Copeognatha). In B.B. Rohdendorf (editor),. Fundamentals of paleontology [Volume 9: Arthropoda, Tracheata, Chelicerata]: 226–236 Moscow Akademii Nauk. 561. Google Scholar

9.

E. Broadhead 1950. A revision of the genus Liposcelis Motschulsky with notes on the position of this genus in the order Corrodentia and on the variability of ten Liposcelis species. Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 101:10335–388. Google Scholar

10.

L. Brundin 1966. Transantarctic relationships and their significance, as evidenced by chironomid midges with a monograph of the subfamilies Podonominae and Aphroteniinae and the austral Heptagyiae. Kunglica Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens Handlingar 11:1–472. Google Scholar

11.

A. Camousseight and T. R. New . 1994. Introducción a los insectos del orden Psocoptera en Chile. Publicación Ocasional del Museo Nacional de Historia Natural, Santiago 49:5–26. Google Scholar

12.

F. M. Carpenter 1992. Superclass Hexapoda. In R.L. Kaesler (editor),. Treatise on invertebrate paleontology, Part R, Arthropoda: 3–4 Boulder, CO Geological Society of America. 1–655. Google Scholar

13.

G. Enderlein 1911. Die fossilen Copeognathen und ihre Phylogenie. Palæontographica 58:279–360. Google Scholar

14.

M. S. Engel and E. E. Perkovsky . 2006a. Sphaeropsocus kuenowii Hagen in Rovno amber from the Ukraine (Psocoptera: Sphaeropsocidae). Entomological News (in press).  Google Scholar

15.

M. S. Engel and E. E. Perkovsky . 2006b. Psocoptera in Eocene Rovno amber from the Ukraine (Insecta). Vestnik Zoologii (in press).  Google Scholar

16.

D. A. Grimaldi 1992. Vicariance biogeography, geographic extinctions, and the North American Oligocene tsetse flies. In M.J. Novacek, Q.D. Wheeler (editors),. Extinction and phylogeny: 178–205 New York Columbia University Press. vi + [1] + 253. Google Scholar

17.

D. Grimaldi and M. S. Engel . 2005a. Evolution of the Insects. Cambridge Cambridge University Press. xv + 755. Google Scholar

18.

D. Grimaldi and M. S. Engel . 2005b. Fossil Liposcelididae and the lice ages (Insecta: Psocodea). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences 273:625–633. Google Scholar

19.

H. A. Hagen 1882. Ueber Psociden in Bernstein. Stettiner Entomologische Zeitung 43:217–238. Google Scholar

20.

A. Handlirsch 1907. Die Fossilen Insekten und die Phylogenie der rezenten Formen: Ein Handbuch für Paläontologen und Zoologen. Leipzig Engelmann. 641–1120. Google Scholar

21.

W. Hennig 1960. Die Dipteren-Fauna von Neuseeland als Systematisches und Tiergeographisches Problem. Beiträge zur Entomologie 8:505–688. Google Scholar

22.

V. V. Hickman 1934. A contribution to the study of Tasmanian Copeognatha. Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania 1933:77–89. Google Scholar

23.

International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature 1999. International Code of Zoological Nomenclature [4th ed]. London International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature. xxix + 306. Google Scholar

24.

K. P. Johnson, K. Yoshizawa, and V. S. Smith . 2004. Multiple origins of parasitism in lice. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences 271:15501771–1776. Google Scholar

25.

H. J. Kolbe 1883. Neue Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Psociden der Bernstein-Fauna. Stettiner Entomologische Zeitung 44:186–191. Google Scholar

26.

B. Kosmowska-Ceranowicz 1987. Charakterystyka mineralogiczno-petrograficzna bursztynonośnych osadów Eocenu w okolicach Chlpowo oraz osadów Paleogenu Polnocnej Polski. Biuletyn Instytutu Geologicznego 356:29–50. Google Scholar

27.

C. Lienhard and N. P. Ashmole . 2000. Sphaeropsocopsis myrtleae sp. n., a blind subterranean psocid from St. Helena (Psocoptera: Sphaeropsocidae). Revue Suisse de Zoologie 106:4905–912. Google Scholar

28.

C. Lienhard and C. N. Smithers . 2002. Psocoptera (Insecta): World catalogue and bibliography. Geneva Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle, Genève. xli + 745. Google Scholar

29.

C. H. C. Lyal 1985. Phylogeny and classification of the Psocodea, with particular reference to the lice (Psocodea: Phthiraptera). Systematic Entomology 10:2145–165. Google Scholar

30.

J. F. McAlpine and J. E. H. Martin . 1969. Canadian amber: a paleontological treasure-chest. Canadian Entomologist 101:8819–838. Google Scholar

31.

R. Menon 1942. Studies on Indian Copeognatha (Psocoptera), II. Nanopsocetae and Psocatropetae. Indian Journal of Entomology 4:123–42. Google Scholar

32.

E. L. Mockford 1993. North American Psocoptera (Insecta). Flora and Fauna Handbook 10:xviii + 1–455. Google Scholar

33.

P. Nascimbene and H. Silverstein . 2000. The preparation of fragile Cretaceous ambers for conservation and study of organismal inclusions. In D. Grimaldi (editor),. Studies on fossils in amber, with particular reference to the Cretaceous of New Jersey: 93–102 Leiden Backhuys Publishers. viii + 498. Google Scholar

34.

J. P. O'Connor 1987. Badonnelia titei (Psocoptera, Sphaeropsocidae); a splendid addition to the library of the National Museum of Ireland! Entomologist's Monthly Magazine 123:1476–1479125. Google Scholar

35.

J. V. Pearman 1936. The taxonomy of the Psocoptera: preliminary sketch. Proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society of London, Series B, Taxonomy 5:358–62. Google Scholar

36.

J. V. Pearman 1953. A new generic form allied to Sphaeropsocus Hagen (Psocoptera, Pachytroctidae). Entomologist's Monthly Magazine 89:1073262. Google Scholar

37.

J. V. Pearman 1958. Augmented description of Badonnelia titei Pearman (Psoc., Sphaeropsocidae), with notes on the genus Sphaeropsocus. Entomologist's Monthly Magazine 94:112649–52. Google Scholar

38.

A. P. Rasnitsyn and D. L. J. Quicke . (editors). 2002. History of insects. Dordrecht Kluwer Academic Publishers. Google Scholar

39.

S. Ritzkowski 1997. K-Ar-Altersbestimmungen der bersteinführenden Sedimente des Samlandes (Paläogen, Bezirk Kaliningrad). Metalla, Bochum 66:19–23. Google Scholar

40.

C. N. Smithers 1972. The classification and phylogeny of the Psocoptera. Memoirs of the Australian Museum 14:1–349. Google Scholar

41.

K. Yoshizawa and K. P. Johnson . 2003. Phylogenetic position of Phthiraptera (Insecta: Paraneoptera) and elevated rate of evolution of mitochondrial 12S and 16S rDNA. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 29:1102–114. Google Scholar

Figure 1.

Sphaeropsocus kuenowii Hagen (slightly reconstructed), as originally illustrated by Hagen, 1882 (a), by Enderlein, 1911 (b), by Badonnel, 1951 (c), and by Bekker-Migdisova and Vishniakova, 1962 (d).All authors erroneously depicted this species with a fully developed, Y-shaped frontal “suture” (which is actually an ecdysial cleavage furrow or scar; since true sutures represent segmental lines). In fact, note how later authors had simply redrawn Enderlein's illustration. Interestingly, Hagen (1882) was far more accurate than his successors in the description and depiction of this species, the latter of whom erroneously depicted a forked cubital, a long stem of vein M, and the anterior margin of the forewing as barely cordate. Despite improvements in optics, the iconography of this interesting species suffered from a steady decline in original and critical observations

i0003-0082-3523-1-1-f01.gif

Figure 2.

Photomicrographs of fossil Sphaeropsocidae.a–d. Sphaeropsocus kuenowii Hagen in mid-Eocene Baltic amber. a. Holotype, MCZ 235. b. KU B-144. c, d. KU B-148, showing detail of the areolate, elytrous forewings. e. Sphaeropsocites lebanensis Grimaldi and Engel, n.gen., n.sp., holotype, AMNH JS-284. f, g. Sphaeropsocoides canadensis Grimaldi and Engel, n.gen., n.sp., holotype CNC 642. All photos except “d” to the same scale

i0003-0082-3523-1-1-f02.jpg

Figure 3.

Dorsal habitus of Sphaeropsoscus kuenowii Hagen (KU B-144), in mid-Eocene Baltic amber, slightly reconstructed

i0003-0082-3523-1-1-f03.gif

Figure 4.

Ventral habitus of Sphaeropsocus kuenowii Hagen (KU B-148), with detail of compound eye and terminal sternites

i0003-0082-3523-1-1-f04.gif

Figure 5.

Sphaeropsocoides canadensis Grimaldi and Engel, new genus and species, in Campanian-aged amber from western Canada.a. Dorsal habitus of holotype, CNC 642. b–d. Details of paratype, CNC 644. b. Anterior portion of head. c. Apical sternites. d. Mesotarsus

i0003-0082-3523-1-1-f05.gif

Figure 6.

Sphaeropsocites lebanensis Grimaldi and Engel, new genus and species, in Neocomian-aged amber from Lebanon.Dorsal habitus of holotype AMNH JS-284

i0003-0082-3523-1-1-f06.gif

Figure 7.

Cladogram of living and extinct genera.Refer to table 1 for a list of the numbered characters supporting the clades

i0003-0082-3523-1-1-f07.gif

Table 1.

  Characters Used in the Phylogeny of Sphaeropsocidae (see fig. 7)

i0003-0082-3523-1-1-t01.gif

[1] 3The name Nanopsocetae was first established by Pearman (1936) and not by Broadhead (1950) as widely cited by many authorities.

[2] 4The difficulty of paraphyly of Psocoptera, Troctomorpha, and Nanopsocetae with respect to the true lice could be easily obviated by the demotion of Phthiraptera to a category within the infraorder Nanopsocetae and the reduction of its constituent suborders to more subordinate categories. The family-group classification of the lice would be entirely unaffected. This would certainly be preferable to the splitting of Psocoptera into innumerable new orders, would minimize the number of taxonomic changes (only five changes), and would permit the reflection of hierarchical relationships in the classification of “higher” Psocodea. Such a classification should be seriously considered by louse systematists.

David Grimaldi and Michael S. Engel "Extralimital Fossils of the “Gondwanan” Family Sphaeropsocidae (Insecta: Psocodea)," American Museum Novitates 2006(3523), 1-18, (31 July 2006). https://doi.org/10.1206/0003-0082(2006)3523[1:EFOTGF]2.0.CO;2
Published: 31 July 2006
Back to Top