Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 April 2005 Feathered Dragons: Studies on the Transition from Dinosaurs to Birds
Frances C. James, John A. Pourtless IV
Author Affiliations +

Feathered Dragons: Studies on the Transition from Dinosaurs to Birds.—Philip J. Currie, Eva B. Koppelhus, Martin A. Shugar, and Joanna L. Wright, Eds. 2004. Indiana University Press, Bloomington. xiii + 361 pp. ISBN 0-253-34373-9. Cloth, $49.95.—The discovery in 1993, in Upper Cretaceous sediments in Montana, of a remarkably complete skeleton of a subadult birdlike dinosaur, Bambiraptor feinbergi (Burnham et al. 1997, 2000), prompted Martin Shugar to organize the Florida Symposium on Dinosaur-Bird Evolution, an international event held on 7 and 8 April 2000 in Fort Lauderdale. The guest of honor was John Ostrom, the Yale paleontologist whose work initiated the current resurgence—now in its fourth decade—of interest in the origin of birds. Bambiraptor feinbergi was on display at the meeting, along with some new fossils from China. Most of the papers in this volume were presented orally at that meeting.

The book has a section of fanciful color plates of drawings of dinosaurs that suit the book's flamboyant title, but the text has a serious scientific intent. Even so, nearly every chapter repeats the mantra of the birds-are-dinosaurs movement, and the foreword assures the reader that, because the “level of controversy over bird origins has waned” (p. xii), attention can now turn to other issues, such as the evolution of feathers and flight. In general, the book reflects the heady enthusiasm of the many paleontologists and systematists in the 1990s who were interpreting the wonderful new fossil discoveries in Early Cretaceous deposits in China and elsewhere as increasing support for the view that birds evolved from certain maniraptoran theropod dinosaurs (troodontids and dromaeosaurs).

After an introductory tribute by Robert Bakker to Edward Hitchcock's mid-19th-century studies of dinosaur footprints found in the Connecticut Valley redbeds, the 14 chapters that report original work are organized into three sections: two on the setting; six on osteology and ichnology (tracks); and six on eggs, nests, feathers, and flight. Dale Russell compares dinosaur assemblages of central Asia and North America, emphasizing the importance of the many specimens of well-preserved small birdlike dinosaurs found in the dune fields of Mongolia, a region that was isolated in the Late Cretaceous period. Most relevant for the subject of this book are the oviraptorosaurs (Oviraptor), troodontids (Saurornithoides), and dromaeosaurs (Velociraptor), plus two primitive “theropod-mimic” birds (Mononykus and Shuvuuia). Russell reminds readers that we do not know the biogeographic origin of birds, or theropods, or dinosaurs. In Chapter 2, Gregory Retallack argues that large-scale acidification was the most direct cause of the selective extinctions of animals and plants that occurred 65 million years ago, after the now-famous meteorite impact that marked the transition from the Cretaceous to the Tertiary period, taking with it all the dinosaurs, the enantiornithine birds, and many other taxa.

The section on osteology and ichnology begins with David Burnham's formal description of the virtually complete skull and post-cranium of the holotype of Bambiraptor feinbergi, based on the individual bones; the description is supplemented with photographs of the skull and drawings of most of the bones. Additional study has suggested that this dromaeosaurid is less velociraptorine than stated here (Senter et al. 2004). The forelimb is very similar to that of Archaeopteryx, but there is no discussion of whether Bambiraptor may indeed have been a bird.

The next three papers describe new details of specimens from Canada and Mongolia. Then Fernando Novas, without suggesting that Unenlagia might be a bird, argues that its ilium is even more birdlike than that of dromaeosaurids, and Joanna Wright reviews information about the birdlike features of dinosaur footprints. Overall, this section adds new information about the birdlike osteology of various maniraptorans.

Section 3 begins with an important paper by Gerald Grellet-Tinner and Luis Chiappe that compares the microstructures of eggs and the nesting behaviors of turtles, crocodilians, dinosaurs, and birds. Like birds, troodontids and oviraptorids laid eggs at daily intervals in open nests (not covered by substrate). Like birds, they had asymmetrical eggs with at least two eggshell layers separated by an aprismatic delimitation. David Varricchio and Frankie Jackson add details to information about Troodon and argue that, because delayed incubation and brooding behavior must have synchronized the hatching of eggs, the body temperature of the adult must have at least temporarily surpassed that of the environment. The argument by Thomas Hopp and Mark Orsen in Chapter 11 that brooding behavior selected for the evolution of long flight feathers is supported only by some drawings of birds in unnatural poses. Contrary to Ostrom, Sankar Chatterjee and R. J. Templin consider the cursorial model for the origin of flight to be biomechanically untenable. They construct a thesis that involves the theropod origin of birds and the arboreal origin of flight and support it by putting the new Chinese fossils in an order that fits that scenario.

The most ornithological paper in the book is the detailed analysis of the plumage of Archaeopteryx by Peter Wellnhofer, confirming that Archaeopteryx was a true bird. It had an especially avian ulnar abduction in the wrist, was adapted for powered and active flight, and—except for the feathered tail—had modern avian plumage in every detail. Caudipteryx, with its short forelimb and modern feathers, living at least 25 million years after Archaeopteryx, is more controversial. It has been called a dinosaur, but it has many characteristics of a flightless bird. Wellnhofer remarks that the “protofeathers” of several other fossil taxa from China are also present in pterosaurs and “it could be that these filamentous structures of the integument have nothing to do with protofeathers at all” (p. 294). Note also that ichthyosaur integumental fibers conform to dromaeosaur protofeathers (Lingham-Soliar 2003). The final chapter by Robert Bakker and Gary Bir is not ornithological. It attempts to characterize the predatory behavior of three genera of large predaceous dinosaurs from the distribution of their shed teeth at Como Bluff, Wyoming.

Most authors in this book have taken the birds-are-dinosaurs paradigm as a given, dismissing alternatives in Kuhnian fashion, but ornithologists should be more cautious. They know that 35 families of modern birds include taxa that are flightless, and that flightless birds can get very large. At least one group of “dinosaurs,” the oviraptorosaurs, is now recorganized as flightless birds (Lü 2000, Maryanska et al. 2002). No wonder they have birdlike eggshells and brooding behavior! If several different groups of early birds evolved flight-lessness, deciphering the origin of birds from the fossil evidence is going to require more ornithological expertise and skepticism than is apparent in this book or several other recent books on this subject. Some of the papers here are not relevant to ornithology. Others may be more relevant to ornithology than their authors thought.

Literature Cited

1.

D. A. Burnham, K. L. Derstler, P. J. Currie, R. T. Bakker, Z. Zhou, and J. H. Ostrom . 2000. Remarkable new birdlike dinosaur (Theropoda: Maniraptora) from the Upper Cretaceous of Montana. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, no. 13.  Google Scholar

2.

D. A. Burnham, K. L. Derstler, and C. J. Linster . 1997. A new specimen of Velociraptor (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from the Two Medicine formation of Montana. Pages 847– 866 in Dinofest International: Proceedings of a Symposium held at Arizona State University (D. L. Wolberg, E. Stump, and G. D. Rosenberg, Eds.). Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia.  Google Scholar

3.

T. Lingham-Soliar 2003. Evolution of birds: Ichthyosaur integumental fibers conform to dromaeosaur protofeathers. Naturwissen-schaften 90:429–432. Google Scholar

4.

J. L&uuml 2000. Oviraptosaurs compared to birds. Pages 175–189 in Fifth International Meeting of the Society of Avian Paleontology and Evolution and the Symposium on Jehol Biota (L. Shi and F. Zhang, Eds.). Vertebrata Palasiatica 38 (Supplement).  Google Scholar

5.

T. Maryanska, H. Osmolska, and M. Wolsan . 2002. Avialan status for Oviraptosauria. Acta Paleontologica Palonica 47:97–116. Google Scholar

6.

P. Senter, R. Barsbold, B. B. Britt, and D. A. Burnham . 2004. Systematics and evolution of Dromaeosauridae (Dinosauria, Theropoda). Bulletin of Gunma Museum of Natural History 8:1–20. Google Scholar

Appendices

Frances C. James and John A. Pourtless IV "Feathered Dragons: Studies on the Transition from Dinosaurs to Birds," The Auk 122(2), 714-716, (1 April 2005). https://doi.org/10.1642/0004-8038(2005)122[0714:R]2.0.CO;2
Published: 1 April 2005
Back to Top