Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2007 Prioritizing Avian Conservation Areas in China by Hotspot Scoring, Heuristics and Optimisation
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

A quantitative process for the conservation analysis of 179 endangered birds of China is presented. At first, for each bird species its conservation priority status was assessed by calculating its conservation priority index (CPI), using six protection attributes (e.g. extinction risk, taxonomic uniqueness, public appeal). Second, based on the birds' conservation status, prioritisation by alternative approaches was performed. A hotspot score, a heuristic and an optimisation approach were used. The territory of China was divided into 583 grid cells (1° ×1°). The efficiency of the current network of protected areas was tested by comparing it with data obtained from prioritization. Analyses indicated that 28 species should be classified as highest conservation priorities, 13 of them were recommended for inclusion to the national wildlife protection list. The optimisation method for area selection was shown to be superior to the heuristic and hotspot approaches, since it selected more currently unreserved high priority areas whilst keeping the total number of sites low. It is proposed that seven Important Bird Areas (IBA's) should be added to the current protected area network. The suggested avian conservation assessment procedure can identify previously overlooked endangered bird species and candidate priority areas for conservation throughout comparative approaches.

REFERENCES

1.

P. Abellán , D. Sánchez-Fernández , J. Velasco , A. Millán 2005. Conservation of freshwater biodiversity: a comparison of different area selection methods. Biodiv. Conserv. 14: 3457–3474. Google Scholar

2.

M. B. Araujo 1999. Distribution patterns of biodiversity and the design of a representative reserve network in Portugal. Divers. Distrib. 5: 151–163. Google Scholar

3.

M. Beger , G. P. Jones , P. L. Munday 2003. Conservation of coral reef biodiversity: a comparison of reserve selection procedures for corals and fishes. Biol. Conserv. 111: 53– 62. Google Scholar

4.

J. M. R. Benayas , E. Montaña 2003. Identifying areas of highvalue vertebrate diversity for strengthening conservation. Biol. Conserv. 114: 357–370. Google Scholar

5.

M. A. Burgman , D.A. Keith , T. V. Walshe 1999. Uncertainty in comparative risk analysis for threatened Australian plant species. Risk Anal. 19: 585–598. Google Scholar

6.

T. H. Cheng (eds). 2000. A complete checklist of species and subspecies of the Chinese birds. Science Press, Beijing, China. Google Scholar

7.

T. H. Cheng , Z. Y. Long , T. C. Lu (eds). 1995. Fauna Sinica. Aves. Vol. X. Passeriformes, Muscicapidae I. Turdinae. Science Press, Beijing, China. Google Scholar

8.

T. H. Cheng , Z. Y. Long , B. L. Zheng (eds). 1987. Fauna Sinica. Aves. Vol. XI. Passeriformes, Muscicapidae II. Timallinae. Science Press, Beijing, China. Google Scholar

9.

T. H. Cheng , Y. K. Tan , T. C. Lu (eds). 1978. Fauna Sinica. Aves. Vol. IV. Galliformes. Science Press, Beijing, China. Google Scholar

10.

T. H. Cheng , Y. H. Xian , G. X. Guan (eds). 1991. Fauna Sinica. Aves. Vol. VI. Columbiformes, Psittaciformes, Cuculiformes and Strigiformes. Science Press, Beijing, China. Google Scholar

11.

H. Cofre , P. A. Marquet 1999. Conservation status, rarity, and geographic priorities for conservation of Chilean mammals: an assessment. Biol. Conserv. 88: 53–68. Google Scholar

12.

A. Das , J. Krishnaswamy , K. S. Bawa , M. C. Kiran , V. Srinivas , N. S. Kumar , K. U. Karanth 2006. Prioritisation of conservation areas in the Western Ghats, India. Biol. Conserv. 133: 16–31. Google Scholar

13.

U. Dhar , R. S. Rawal , J. Upreti 2000. Setting priorities for conservation of medicinal plants — a case study in the Indian Himalaya. Biol. Conserv. 95: 57–65. Google Scholar

14.

J. R. Dunk , W. J. Zielinski , H. H. Welsh 2006. Evaluating reserves for species richness and representation in northern California. Divers. Distrib. 12: 434–442. Google Scholar

15.

H. A. Eeley , M. J. Lawes , B. Reyers 2001. Priority areas for conservation of subtropical indigenous forest in southern Africa: a case study from KwaZulu-Natal. Biodivers. Conserv. 10: 1221–1246. Google Scholar

16.

N. J. Fox , L. E. Beckley 2005. Priority areas for conservation of Western Australian coastal fishes: a comparison of hotspot, biogeographical and complementarity approaches. Biol. Conserv. 125: 399–410. Google Scholar

17.

D. R. Given , D. A. Norton 1993. A multivariate approach to assessing threat and for priority setting in threatened species conservation. Biol. Conserv. 64: 57–66. Google Scholar

18.

E. Greenbaum , O. Komar 2005. Threat Assessment and Conservation Prioritization of the Herpetofauna of EI Salvador. Biodiv. Conserv. 14: 2377–2395. Google Scholar

19.

P. C. Griffin 1999. Endangered species diversity ‘hotspots’ in Russia and centers of endemism. Biodiv. Conserv. 8: 495–511. Google Scholar

20.

F. M. Lei , Y. H. Qu , Q. Q. Tang , S. C. An 2003. Priorities for the conservation of avian biodiversity in China based on the distribution patterns of endemic bird genera. Biodiv. Conserv. 12: 2487–2501. Google Scholar

21.

LINDO Systems, Inc., Industrial LINDO/PC release 6.1. 1999. LINDO Systems, Inc. Chicago, USA Google Scholar

22.

A. T. Lombard , C. Hiton-Taylor , A. G. Rebelo , R. L. Pressey , R. M. Cowling 1999. Reserve selection in the Succulent Karoo, South Africa: coping with high compositional turnover. Plant Ecol. 142: 35–55. Google Scholar

23.

J. MacKinnon , K. Phillipps , F. Q. He (eds). 2000. A Field Guide to the Birds of China (Chinese translation). Hunan Educational Press, Changsha, China. Google Scholar

24.

A. Pérez-Arteaga , S. E Jackson , E. Carrera , K. J. Gaston 2005. Priority sites for wildfowl conservation in Mexico. Anim. Conserv. 8: 41–50. Google Scholar

25.

R. L. Pressey 2002. Classics in physical geography revisited. Prog. Phys. Geog. 26: 434–441. Google Scholar

26.

R. L. Pressey , A. O. Nicholls 1989. Efficiency in conservation evaluation: scoring versus iterative approaches. Biol. Conserv. 50: 199–218. Google Scholar

27.

A. S. Rodrigues , J. O. Cerdeira , K. J. Gaston 2000. Flexibility, efficiency, and accountability: adapting reserve selection algorithms to more complex conservation problems. Ecography 23: 565–574. Google Scholar

28.

J. P. Rodriguez , F. Rojas-Suárez , C. J. Shape 2004. Setting priorities for the conservation of Venezuela's threatened birds. Oryx 38: 373–382. Google Scholar

29.

H. Sarakinos , A. O. Nicholls , A. Tubert , A. Aggarwal , C. R. Margules , S. Sarkar 2001. Area prioritization for biodiversity conservation in Québec on the basis of species distributions: a preliminary analysis. Biodiv. Conserv. 10: 1419–1472. Google Scholar

30.

S. Sfenthourakis , A. Legakis 2001. Hotspots of endemic terrestrial invertebrates in southern Greece. Biodiv. Conserv. 10: 1387–1417. Google Scholar

31.

J. M. Thiollay 2002. Bird diversity and selection of protected areas in a large neotropical forest tract. Biodiv. Conserv. 11: 1377–1395. Google Scholar

32.

J. K. Turpie , L. E. Beckley , S. M. Katua 2000. Biogeography and selection of priority areas for conservation of South African coastal fishes. Biol. Conserv. 92: 59–72. Google Scholar

33.

S. Wang , Y. Xie (eds). 2004. China Species Red List. Vol. I–III. Higher Education Press, Beijing, China. Google Scholar

34.

P. Williams , D. Gibbons , C. Margules , A. Rebelo , C. Humphries , R. Pressey 1996. A comparison of richness hotspots, rarity hotspots, and complementary areas for conserving diversity of British birds. Conserv. Biol. 10: 155–174. Google Scholar

35.

A. G. Wolman 2006. Measurement and meaningfulness in conservation science. Conserv. Biol. 20: 1626–1634. Google Scholar

36.

Z. Xie 2003. Characteristics and conservation priority of threatened plants in the Yangtze valley. Biodiv. Conserv. 12: 65–72. Google Scholar

37.

J. Y. Yip , R. T. Corlett , D. Dudgeon 2004. A fine-scale gap analysis of the existing protected area system in Hong Kong, China. Biodiv. Conserv. 13: 943–957. Google Scholar

38.

J. Y. Yip , R. T. Corlett , D. Dudgeon 2006. Selecting small reserves in a human-dominated landscape: A case study of Hong Kong, China. J. Environ. Manage. 78: 86–96. Google Scholar
You-Hua Chen "Prioritizing Avian Conservation Areas in China by Hotspot Scoring, Heuristics and Optimisation," Acta Ornithologica 42(2), 119-128, (1 December 2007). https://doi.org/10.3161/068.042.0206
Received: 1 March 2007; Accepted: 1 November 2007; Published: 1 December 2007
JOURNAL ARTICLE
10 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top