Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 June 2011 Genetic Diversity of Maghrebian Hottentotta (Scorpiones: Buthidae) Scorpions Based on CO1: New Insights on the Genus Phylogeny and Distribution
Pedro Sousa, Elsa Froufe, D. James Harris, Paulo Célio Alves, Arie van der Meijden
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The medically important scorpion genus Hottentotta Birula, 1908 has long been a taxonomical challenge. This species-rich scorpion genus contains three lineages spread over most of Africa and part of Asia. The Maghrebian Hottentotta was historically recognised as a single species, H. franzwerneri (Birula, 1914), divided in two subspecies with disjunct distributions. A recent morphological study raised both Maghreb subspecies to species level, H. franzwerneri and H. gentili (Pallary, 1924). In this study we assess the phylogenetic relationships between specimens of the genus Hottentotta from Morocco using cytochrome oxidase 1 (CO1) mitochondrial DNA sequences. Our finding of H. gentili in the eastern portion of Morocco increases the known range of this taxon and significantly reduces the geographic distance that separates it from H. franzwerneri. Furthermore, we found four well supported clades in the Maghrebian Hottentotta. All H. franzwerneri specimens group in the franzwerneri clade, but H. gentili specimens group in three different clades. The Ziz valley clade form a sister group to the franzwerneri clade, specimens from the core range of H. gentili group in the central clade, while specimens from the southern distribution of the species group in the Low Draa valley clade, basal in our tree. These findings challenge current Hottentotta taxonomy because they imply paraphyly of H. gentili, although mitochondrial introgression cannot be excluded. Further studies are needed to fully comprehend the taxonomy of Hottentotta from this region and the role that colour characters play in scorpion species diagnoses.

INTRODUCTION

The scorpion genus Hottentotta Birula, 1908 is a widespread and diverse genus. Placed in the Buthidae C.L. Koch, 1837, the largest scorpion family, it comprises about 35 species that are found across Africa, the Arabian Peninsula and in Asia as far east as India (Kovařík 2007). The position of the genus Hottentotta relative to other buthids has not been firmly resolved. Taxonomic relations with the genus Mesobuthus Vachon, 1950 remain uncertain based on morphological data (Fet & Lowe 2000). To date the only study that tried to resolve the phylogeny of the Buthidae using DNA sequence data placed Hottentotta as the sister taxon to Buthacus Birula, 1908 (Fet et al. 2003). It should be noted, however, that the latter study only employed a short fragment of the rapidly evolving 16S rRNA gene to resolve the relatively deep splits in the family Buthidae.

The species diversity within the Hottentotta genus has been grouped in three lineages: the African, the Saharo-Sindian and the Indian. These lineages have been proposed based on morphological data alone (Birula 1914) and their relationships remain largely unresolved. The Maghreb representatives of this genus are placed in the Saharo-Sindian lineage, whose closest relatives can be found only in Egypt. The Maghreb Hottentotta have long been classified as a single species, Hottentotta franzwerneri (Birula, 1914) with two accepted subspecies with disjunct distributions: H. f. franzwerneri (Birula, 1914) and H. f. gentili (Pallary, 1924) (Fet & Lowe 2000). In 2007, Kovařík produced the most comprehensive revision to date of the genus Hottentotta. In this work the author elevated H. gentili (Pallary, 1924) to species status, stressing that the differences found in leg coloration, yellow in H. franzwerneri and black in H. gentili, were enough to make such a taxonomic change. Besides this clear morphological difference, the only other difference found between the two species was the presence of slight sexual dimorphism in the metasoma of H. franzwerneri, not observed in H. gentili. In his review of the genus, Kovařík (2007) also used colour characters to separate other groups of species.

Little is known about both species' ecology, although it is clear that H. gentili has a much wider distribution, approximately three times that of H. franzwerneri. As a result H. gentili can be found over a much larger altitudinal range, and thus in different climatic conditions, ranging from the partially snow-covered mountains of the High and Anti Atlas down to the Saharan plains. In comparison, H. franzwerneri is found on the lower Ksour Mountains of the Saharan Atlas Range and in the south-projecting plateaux, areas dominated by a Saharan climate. Both species, even if occurring in dry areas, are associated with more humid microhabitat conditions (Vachon 1952). This ecological requirement brings then into close contact with human settlements. Disregarded until recently as a potential threat, H. gentili was found as an important cause of scorpion envenomation in the Moroccan southwest, being responsible for several deaths in the region (Touloun et al. 2001). To our knowledge, no data regarding the specific toxicity or composition of H. franzwerneri venom have been published. Given their medical importance, understanding the distribution of the genus's diversity in the region is important, because the correct identification of scorpion species is essential to the treatment of envenomation (e.g., Touloun et al. 2001).

The Maghreb region is highly biogeographically diverse, and cryptic diversity has recently been uncovered in both the Maghreb vertebrates (e.g., Lima et al. 2009) and the scorpion fauna (Gantenbein & Largiadèr 2003). The aim of this study is therefore to assess genetic diversity of Hottentotta specimens from Morocco using cytochrome oxidase 1 (CO1) mtDNA sequences, the gene used in barcoding studies (e.g., Hebert et al. 2003). Our sequence data show a strikingly different picture of the Maghrebian Hottentotta taxa to that found using morphological data alone.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Information and geographic location of the specimens, all captured in Morocco, are given in Table 1 and Fig. 1. All specimens were examined morphologically, and identified to species level following Vachon (1952) and Kovařík (2007). All specimens are deposited in the collection of CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto, Vairão, Vila do Conde, Portugal.

For the genetic analyses, whole genomic DNA was extracted from preserved (ethanol 96 %) muscle tissue (leg or metasoma fragment) using a standard high-salt protocol (Sambrook et al. 1989). A fragment of the CO1 gene was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the primers LCO1490 and HCO2198 from Folmer et al. (1994).

The PCR conditions (25 µl reactions) were as follows: each reaction contained 2.5 µl 10× Invitrogen PCR Buffer, 0.5 µl 10 mM of each primer, 1.5 µl 50 mM MgCl2, 0.5 µl 10mM dNTP's, 0.1 µl Invitrogen Taq DNA Polymerase and approximately 100 ng per µl DNA template. The cycle parameters were: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 3 min, denaturation at 94 °C (30 s), annealing at 52°C (45 s) and extension at 72°C (45 s) repeated for 35 cycles and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. Amplified DNA templates were enzymatically purified and sequenced using the ABI PRISM BigDye Terminator protocols. The sequencing primers were the same as those used in the PCRs. Sequences were read on an ABI-310.

TABLE 1

Localities of samples used, their position in Fig. 1, their respective Clade in Fig. 2, and corresponding GenBank accession numbers. Coordinates are in the WGS84 datum, in decimal degrees.

t01_135.gif

Fig. 1.

Map showing the sampling locations of Hottentotta from Morocco included in this study. The estimated distribution of both Hottentotta species proposed by Vachon (1952) is indicated. The clades resolved in Fig. 2 are noted. Specimen codes follow Table 1.

f01_135.jpg

Sequences of seven Buthidae taxa, Androctonus australis (L., 1758), A. mauritaniens (Pocock, 1902), Buthus sp., Centruroides vittatus (Say, 1821), Mesobuthus eupeus (C.L. Koch, 1839), Tityus nematochirus Mello-Leitão, 1940, Zabius fuscus (Thorell, 1876) and one Scorpionidae taxon: Scorpio fuseus (Ehrenberg, 1829), were used as hierarchical out-groups.

Chromatograms were checked by eye using ChromasPro 1.41 (technelysium.com.au) and the sequences were subsequently aligned using ClustalW as implemented in MEGA 4 (Tamura et al. 2007) using the default settings. The resulting alignment was checked by eye, but was not found to require additional editing. Phylogeny reconstruction was performed using Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian Inference (BI) methods. The best fitting models of sequence evolution were determined by the AIC criterion in Modeltest 3.7 (Posada & Crandall 1998). ML tree searches were performed using PhyML, version 2.4.4 (Guindon & Gascuel 2003). Bootstrap branch support values were calculated with 1000 replicates. The BI analysis was conducted with MrBayes 3.1.2 (Huelsenbeck & Ronquist 2001), using models estimated with Modeltest under the AIC criterion, with 5,000,000 generations, sampling trees every 10th generation (and calculating a consensus tree after omitting the first 12,500 trees). Log likelihood scores for the remaining trees were examined in Tracer 1.4 ( http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer) and the appropriateness of the burnin-period was checked. Genetic variability was calculated with DnaSP v.5.10.01 (Librado & Rozas 2009), excluding sequences Sc434 and Sc435 due to a section of missing data (close to 200 bp) in both sequences.

In order to calculate the average genetic distances found between species recognized in genera of related Buthidae scorpions, CO1 sequences of Centruroides Marx, 1890 and Mesobuthus Vachon, 1950 were downloaded from GenBank and aligned, resulting in alignments of 39 and 19 sequences respectively. Genetic distances were calculated using MEGA 4 with Jukes-Cantor correction, using pairwise deletion of gaps and missing data, with several sequences per species when available. The alignments used are available from the authors upon request.

RESULTS

The alignment used in the phylogeny reconstruction consisted of 21 new DNA sequences from Hottentotta specimens collected in 14 locations covering most of southern Morocco. Additionally, seven outgroup sequences were used in the analysis (see Table 1). From the sequences produced, 16 haplotypes were resolved. The alignment had a length of 639 base pairs, with 92 polymorphic sites of which 87 were parsimony informative. High levels of genetic variability were found in the analysed Hottentotta sequences (Hd=0.98, π= 0.065).

The recovered ML and BI trees did not differ in their topologies in any branch with moderate to high support (Bayesian posterior probability of over 0.83, see Fig. 2).

Four highly supported clades were retrieved within Hottentotta. Thirteen specimens from the core range of H. gentili grouped together in a single Central clade that grouped with little internal support. The clade consisting of two H. franzwerneri specimens nested strongly within H. gentili clades (Bayesian posterior probability of 1 ; Fig. 2). The sister group of the H. franzwerneri clade consists of two specimens collected in the Oued Ziz valley. Interestingly, these two specimens were not the closest geographically to the franzwerneri clade, this was specimen Sc795 (Fig. 1). Noticeably, the four specimens from southern Morocco grouped together in a basal clade in relation to the remaining Hottentotta specimens.

Our sampling effort significantly increased the known distribution of H. gentili to the eastern portion of Morocco.

DISCUSSION

Our study of Hottentotta scorpions found high levels of genetic diversity, retrieving 16 haplotypes in 21 specimens analysed, a result also reported by previous studies conducted on scorpions of the Maghreb and Iberian Peninsula, such as Buthus Leach, 1815 (Gantenbein & Largiadèr 2003; Sousa et al. 2010) and Scorpio L., 1758 (Froufe et al. 2008). More unexpected was the subdivision of two species into four well supported clades. More than half of all H. gentili specimens analysed grouped together in a clade containing specimens collected in the centre of the species' known range. Also noteworthy is the grouping of our H. franzwerneri specimens well within H. gentili clades (above 94% bootstrap support). The inclusion of H. franzwerneri in the H. gentili clade may be explained by two different hypotheses. If H. gentili is a monophyletic species, then H. gentili mitochondrial introgression may have occurred, leaving a mark on the mitochondrial DNA of the H. franzwerneri specimens. On the other hand, if mitochondrial introgression has not confounded the resolution of the actual relationships of the clades of the Maghreb Hottentotta, the current taxonomy would need revision since this finding suggests that H. gentili as currently recognized may be a paraphyletic species. The existence of cryptic species that can only be uncovered using molecular characters seems to be a common pattern in scorpions (e.g., Gantenbein et al. 2000), due to a paucity of informative morphological characters in many taxa. This may lead to an over-evaluation of single morphological characters in delimiting species. In this case the use of colour alone to separate species within the Hottentotta genus must be re-evaluated in light of this new finding, as this was the only distinctive character used by Vachon (1952) and Kovařík (2007) to separate these taxa. Kovařík (2007) established H. gentili and H. franzwerneri as distinct species, but mentioned only the leg coloration and slight differences in sexual dimorphism of the metasoma and chela in H. franzwerneri. The latter differences were not found by Vachon (1952) although this author studied a similar number of adult specimens of both sexes of H. franzwerneri compared to Kovařík (2007). Both Vachon and Kovařík considered these species also geographically disjunct, with a minimum distance of around 200 km between their areas of distribution (Fig. 1). Nevertheless, the discover of H. gentili in the proximity of Bou Arfa (specimen Sc795) reduces the known distance between both species to around 70 km, and, more importantly, strongly suggests either that both species can be in contact in the present or that they have been in contact as recently as around 6,000 years ago, in the last wet phase in North Africa (deMenocal et al. 2000; Kuper & Kröpelin 2006).

Fig. 2.

Phylogram showing phylogenetic relationships estimated using Bayesian Inference as described in the text. Numbers at branches are Bayesian posterior probabilities and ML bootstrap percentages respectively. The tree was rooted with Scorpio fuliginosus (not shown). Codes refer to Table 1.

f02_135.jpg

Ecologically H. gentili and, to a lesser extent, H. franzwerneri are found in a wide variety of habitats and altitudinal gradients, although as suggested by Vachon (1952) the Maghreb Hottentotta are not true desert species. Even if they can be found in the south of Morocco, they appear to exist only in those places that can provide enough soil humidity, which in the drier south can be restricted to oases and river valleys. This factor may explain the connectivity found between H. franzwerneri and the Ziz valley clade if we assume that rivers provide corridors for dispersal.

The finding of a clade in the Low Draa Valley was also unexpected. This basal clade is the most genetically divergent according to our CO1 data, and must have separated early from the main Maghreb Hottentotta clade. We hypothesize that a continuously flowing Draa River, rather than seasonally flowing as is currently the case (abrupt changes in North Africa river basins are documented, e.g., Osborne et al. 2008), may have formed a biogeographic barrier. Other scorpion species only known from the south of the Draa River drainage in Morocco, including Buthus bonito Lourenço & Geniez, 2005 and Microbuthus maroccanus Lourenço, 2002, show that the Draa River may act as a barrier for scorpions. Buthus rochati Lourenço, 2003 can also be included in this pattern, because this species is only known from a region adjacent to the north of the drainage basin. The locality of specimen Sc 137 suggests that the distribution of the species may extend further south than was reported by Vachon (1952) and Kovařík (2007), as can be seen in Fig. 1.

However it is noteworthy that the closest relatives of the Maghreb Hottentotta can only be found in Egypt [H. minax (L. Koch, 1875), Saharo-Sindian lineage] or south of the Sahara desert [e.g. H. hottentotta (Fabricius, 1787), African lineage] (Vachon & Stockmann 1968). This distribution pattern is remarkably different from other scorpions that show similar habitat preferences. In comparison, Buthus species can be found across North Africa except for the true desert areas (Vachon 1952). This is a further indication that the Maghreb Hottentotta require higher humidity in microhabitat conditions when compared, for example, with Buthus species.

In order to compare the genetic distances we found between the different clades of Hottentotta, we calculated the Jukes-Cantor corrected genetic distance between species of two different buthid genera. Based on 19 Centruroides species for which CO1 sequences were available in GenBank, we found an average genetic distance between species of 11.2 %, with a standard deviation of 2.6 %. A similar analysis was made on CO1 sequence data available for five species of Mesobuthus, which showed an average genetic distance between species of 15%, with a standard deviation of 2.4%. These are similar to the distances found in our study (12.1%; Table 2) between the lower Draa clade and the Central clade, further suggesting that this clade may merit species status.

TABLE 2

Net pairwise sequence divergence (Jukes-Cantor) between the four clades found in Maghreb Hottentotta. Within brackets is the value for within lineage divergence for the Central clade.

t02_135.gif

In conclusion, four well-supported clades were found in the two species of Hottentotta from the Maghreb. These suggest the paraphyletic positioning of H. franzwerneri, although as our data derive from mtDNA alone, an ancient mitochondrial introgression event from H. gentili cannot be excluded. The existence of a putative cryptic species in the south of Morocco, possibly related with the lower Draa River is proposed. Additional fieldwork in the South of Morocco and adjacent areas of Algeria (a current conflict zone due to border issues between both countries), together with the analysis of nuclear genes, are necessary to clarify the taxonomic identity of H. franzwerneri and the existence of a cryptic species in the southern area of the Draa River.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This project was supported by grants from Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia POCTI/BIA-BDE/74349/2006 (to DJH) and SFRH/BPD/48042/2008 (AvdM). The work was partly funded through an FCT I&D project (PTDC/BIA-BEC/104644/2008) to AvdM. Thanks to all our colleagues who participated during fieldwork.

REFERENCES

1.

A.A. Birula 1914. Ergebnisse einer von Prof. Franz Werner im Sommer 1910 mit Unterstützung aus dem Legate Wedl ausgeführten zoologischen Forschungdreise nach Algerien. VI. Skorpione und Solifugen. Sitzungsberichteb der Kaiserlich-Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften 123 (1): 633–688. Google Scholar

2.

P. Demenocal , J. Ortiz , T. Guilderson , J. Adkins , M. Sarnthein , L. Baker & M. Yarusinsky 2000. Abrupt onset and termination of the African Humid Period: rapid climate responses to gradual insolation forcing. Quaternary Science Reviews 19: 347–361. Google Scholar

3.

V. Fet & G. Lowe 2000. Family Buthidae C.L. Koch, 1837. In : V. Fet , W.D. Sissom , G. Lowe & M.E. Braunwalder , eds, Catalog of the Scorpions of the World (1758–1998). New York: The New York Entomological Society, pp. 54–286. Google Scholar

4.

V. Fet , B. Gantenbein , A.V. Gromov , G. Lowe & W.R. Lourenço 2003. The first molecular phylogeny of Buthidae (Scorpiones). Euscorpius 4: 1–10. Google Scholar

5.

O. Folmer , M. Black , W. Hoeh , R. Lutz & R. Vrijenhoek 1994. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology 3 (5): 294–299. Google Scholar

6.

E. Froufe , P. Sousa , P.C. Alves & D.J. Harris 2008. Genetic diversity within Scorpio maurus from Morocco: preliminary evidence based on CO1 mitochondrial DNA sequences. Biologia 63 (6): 1157–1160. Google Scholar

7.

B. Gantenbein & C.R. Largiadèr 2003. The phylogeographic importance of the Strait of Gibraltar as a gene flow barrier in terrestrial arthropods: a case study with the scorpion Buthus occitanus as model organism. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 28: 119–130. Google Scholar

8.

B. Gantenbein , C. Kropf , C.R. Largiadèr & A. Scholl 2000. Molecular and morphological evidence for the presence of a new buthid taxon (Scorpiones: Buthidae) on the island of Cyprus. Revue Suisse de Zoologie 107: 213–232. Google Scholar

9.

S. Guindon & O. Gascuel 2003. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Systematic Biology 52 (5): 696–704. Google Scholar

10.

P.D.N. Hebert , A. Cywinska , S.L. Ball & J.R. Dewaard 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 270: 313–321. Google Scholar

11.

J.P. Huelsenbeck & F. Ronquist 2001. Mr. Bayes: Bayesian inference of the phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17: 754–755. Google Scholar

12.

F. Kovařík 2007. A revision of the genus Hottentotta Birula, 1908, with descriptions of four new species (Scorpiones: Buthidae). Euscorpius 58: 1–107. Google Scholar

13.

R. Kuper & S. Kröpelin 2006. Climate-controlled Holocene occupation in the Sahara: Motor of Africa's evolution. Science 313: 803. Google Scholar

14.

P. Librado & J. Rozas 2009. DnaSP v5: A software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25: 1451–1452. Google Scholar

15.

A. Lima , C. Pinho , S. Larbes , M.A. Carretero , J.C. Brito & D.J. Harris 2009. Relationships of Podarcis wall lizards from Algeria based on mtDNA data. Amphibia-Reptilia 30: 483–492. Google Scholar

16.

A.H. Osborne , D. Vance , E.J. Rohling , N. Barton , M. Rogerson & N. Fello 2008. A humid corridor across the Sahara for the migration of early modern humans out of Africa 120,000 years ago. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 105: 16444–16447. Google Scholar

17.

D. Posada & K.A. Crandall 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817–818. Google Scholar

18.

J. Sambrook , E.F. Fritsch & T. Maniatis 1989. Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Press. Google Scholar

19.

P. Sousa , E. Froufe , P.C. Alves & D.J. Harris 2010. Genetic diversity within scorpions of the genus Buthus from the Iberian Peninsula: mitochondrial DNA sequence data indicate additional distinct cryptic lineages. Journal of Arachnology 38 (2): 206–211. Google Scholar

20.

K. Tamura , J. Dudley , M. Nei & S. Kumar 2007. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24: 1596–1599. Google Scholar

21.

O. Touloun , T. Slimani & A. Boumezzough 2001. Epidemiological survey of scorpion envenomation in southwestern Morocco. Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins 7 (2): 199–218. Google Scholar

22.

M. Vachon 1952. Études sur les scorpions. Alger: Institut Pasteur d'Algérie, (published in 1948–1951 in Archives de l'Institut Pasteur d'Algérie , 1948, 26: 25–90, 162 –208, 288–316, 441–481; 1949, 27: 66–100, 134–169, 281–288, 334–396; 1950, 28: 152 –216, 383–413; 1951, 29:46–104.) Google Scholar

23.

M. Vachon & R. Stockmann 1968. Contribution a l'étude des scorpions africains appartenant au genre Buthotus Vachon 1949 et étude de la variabilité. Monitore Zoologico Italiano (N. S.) 2 (suppl.): 81–149. Google Scholar
Pedro Sousa, Elsa Froufe, D. James Harris, Paulo Célio Alves, and Arie van der Meijden "Genetic Diversity of Maghrebian Hottentotta (Scorpiones: Buthidae) Scorpions Based on CO1: New Insights on the Genus Phylogeny and Distribution," African Invertebrates 52(1), 135-143, (1 June 2011). https://doi.org/10.5733/afin.052.0106
Published: 1 June 2011
KEYWORDS
CO1
colour
cryptic diversity
Hottentotta
Maghreb
mitochondrial DNA
phylogeny
Back to Top