Translator Disclaimer
1 January 2020 Gaseous Pollutants in Basra City, Iraq
Ali Abdul Zahra Douabul, Sama Sameer Al Maarofi, Hamid Talib Al-Saad, Shukri Al-Hassen
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

This study aimed to detect the present levels and distribution of CO, CO2, SO2, NO2, and total hydrocarbons gases (HCs) produced from different industrial plants in Basra city, Iraq. Measurements were carried out in the winter and summer of 2011. CO, SO2, NO2, and HC concentrations were measured using a Drager CMS portable detector, while CO2 concentrations were measured using a RI-411A portable detector. The average minimum concentrations of CO, CO2, SO2, NO2, and HCs were 2.0 mg/L, 250.0 mg/L, 4.0 mg/L, 0.4 mg/L, 0.5 mg/L, and 0.3 mg/L, respectively. Their average maximum concentrations were 18.0 mg/L, 280 mg/L, 0.9 mg/L, 1.3 mg/L, and 1.3 mg/L, respectively. The results indicate that stations close to the electrical power plant and oil refinery have higher levels of pollutants when compared to the urban station. According to the standards guidelines reported by the World Health Organization's Environmental Protection Act, the detected concentrations of CO for short-term exposure and the average concentrations of NO2 and SO2 for short-term and long-term exposure pose serious health hazards, especially in the industrial areas.

Introduction

The atmosphere is generally defined as a complex, dynamic, natural gaseous system that is important in order to support life.1 The quality status of air is of crucial importance not only to healthy human life but also for wildlife, vegetation, water, and soil.2,3 Generally, air quality is rated and can be ranked as being good quality (which refers to clean, clear, unpolluted air) or poor quality (which occurs when pollutants are present at a level considered to be dangerous for the health of humans and the environment).4,5 Bad air quality generally results from increasing levels of gaseous pollutants, which are mainly considered toxic for humans and other living organisms due to their extensive natural or anthropogenic activities.6 Natural gaseous pollutants are classified as natural-primary pollutants (which are released mostly from volcanic eruption), carbon monoxide gas from motor vehicle exhaust, and as sulfur dioxide released from factories, or they can be natural-secondary pollutants like ground-level ozone.6 These pollutants can also be released as primary or secondary pollutants from different anthropogenic activities.7 The most common primary anthropogenic pollutants produced by human activity are: (1) sulfur oxides (SOx), especially sulfur dioxide (SO2), which is produced mainly in power stations; (2) nitrogen oxides (NOx), especially nitrogen dioxide (NO2), which is released primarily via high temperature combustion; (3) carbon monoxide (CO), which is the major product of incomplete fuel combustion; (4) carbon dioxide (CO2), which is released from combustion, cement production, and respiration; and (5) ammonia (NH3), which is released primarily via agricultural processes.8

According to both environment protection agency and global World Health Organizations, air pollution can be a serious cause of different health conditions, including respiratory infections and lung cancer.89101112 Gehring et al13 indicated that long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution can cause allergies and that individuals—especially children under the age of 8—are more susceptible to developing asthma.14 Other studies have also indicated that the risk of developing lung cancer is highly related to air pollution caused by high traffic15 or long-term expose to nitrogen dioxide.16 Gaseous pollutants are also considered to be risk factors for stroke17 and are associated with an increased incidence of and mortality from coronary artery disease. The early indication of air pollution goes back to the twelfth century, when smoke from burning coal (mainly CO and CO2) caused serious health problems in England. The discovery led King Edward to become the first to ban the use of coal in lime kilns in London in 1307.18 Along with the increase in number of industrial zones within cities and urban areas, it has been noted that their impacts have significantly affected the surrounding air quality.1 In 1948, one of the most dramatic air inversions occurred in Donora, Pennsylvania, when a wall of smog killed 20 people and sickened 7,000 more.18 Additionally, in England two episodes of “killer fogs” claimed the lives of more than 6,000 people in 1952.19 On the other hand, some environmental variables intensified the dangers of certain gases; for example, in Meuse Valley, Belgium in 1930, the high humidity concentrated the SO2 gas and increased its release levels, leading to the deaths of 63 people in a space of 5 days.19

Recently, the general quality of ambient air in Basra city (southern Iraq) has been decreasing because of an increase in the city's population and high traffic levels, as well as the expansion and establishment of several industrial plants, including petrochemical plants, oil refineries, burned natural gas flames, fertilizer plants, paper and pulp mills, power generation stations, and industrial workshops.21 These have put the local population in direct daily contact with the different gaseous pollutants that are caused by daily urban activities, mostly by increasing the use of fossil fuel combustion from electrical generators and motors vehicle, as well as exposing the population to industrial activities. Previous studies have indicated high concentrations of CO, NO2, SO2, and HCs within the industrial area in Basra city,212223 and given that concentrations from these emissions are constantly increasing, these high levels have become hazardous to human health. The lack of management and control of the gaseous discharges and residues in urban and industrial areas has increased the possibility that the air quality has become worse. This study aims to detect the present levels and distribution of CO, CO2, SO2, NO2, and total hydrocarbons gases (HCs) that are produced from different industrial plants in Basra city in southern Iraq. This survey will also serve as background information to help future environmental assessment studies within the region.

Materials and Methods

Seven stations were chosen in Basra city—Al-Qurna, Al-Deer, Garmatt Ali, Al-Ashar, Abu Al-Khaseeb, Al-Seeba, and Al-Faw (Fig. 1). These stations were selected in order to monitor the concentrations of CO, CO2, SO2, NO2, and HCs in the ambient air during the winter and summer months of 2011. CO, SO2, NO2, and HC concentrations were measured using the portable detection instrument Drager Chip-Measurement-System (Dragerwerk AG & Co, Lubeck, Germany), while CO2 concentrations were measured using the portable detection instrument RI-411A (RKI Instruments, Inc., Union City, California, USA). The instruments used were calibrated and certified every six months by sending them to the manufacturing company.

Figure 1.

Sampling locations for air pollution in Basra city, southern Iraq.

10.4137_ASWR.S10835-fig1.tif

The survey took seven days (one day per station) for every season. The gaseous probe detector was fixed to a 1.5 meter stand, which represents the average human height, to ensure that it was possible to measure the average concentrations that most people inhale. The average of two readings was taken between late afternoon and sunset under low to moderate wind speed, in order to capture the amount of traffic during rush hours.

A principal component analysis (PCA) was constructed using the average seasonal reading of each pollutant at each station. PCA plot was developed using the CANOCO program for Windows 724 to examine the differences in average levels of gaseous pollutants in the atmosphere across the seven selected stations during the study period. Focus scaling of the data was set on inter-species correlation and the species scores were divided by the standard deviation.

Results and Discussion

The average concentrations of gaseous pollutants measured in the seven stations are listed in Table 1 and are shown in Figure 2. The results indicate that average concentrations of CO, NO2, and HCs are significantly different (P < 0.005) among the studied stations. The results also indicate that the average concentrations of the monitored gaseous pollutants were higher in the winter than those recorded in the summer. This may be primarily attributed to the differences in weather conditions, especially wind speeds and directions,23 air temperature,21 and humidity;22 however, these variation were not statistically significant (P > 0.005). During the study period, the concentration of CO ranged from 4.0 mg/L to 18.0 mg/L, with mean concentration at 10.6 mg/L. The concentration of CO2 ranged from 230.0 mg/L to 280.0 mg/L, with mean concentration at 262.1 mg/L. The concentration of SO2 ranged from 0.4 mg/L to 0.9 mg/L, with mean concentration at 0.6 mg/L. The concentration of NO2 ranged from 0.5 mg/L to 1.3 mg/L, with mean concentration at 0.9 mg/L. Moreover, the concentration of HCs gases ranged from 0.3 mg/L to 1.3 mg/L, with mean concentration at 0.8 mg/L.

Figure 2.

CO, CO2, NO2, SO2 and HCs concentrations of Basra city's ambient air during winter and summer of 2011.

10.4137_ASWR.S10835-fig2.tif

Table 1.

Average concentrations (mg/L ± SD) of the selected gaseous pollutants in Basra city during winter and summer of 2011.

10.4137_ASWR.S10835-table1.tif

The PCA analysis indicated that Al-Ashar and Al-Seeba stations were highly polluted when compared to the other monitored stations, while Al-Qurna, Al-Deer, and Al-Faw stations were less polluted (Fig. 3). However, according to the standard guideline concentrations of CO, CO2, NO2, and SO2 reported by the global health organizations listed in Table 2, CO2 concentrations were within acceptable limits. Among the studied areas, average CO concentrations were higher than the levels permitted for short-term exposure, as previously reported.9,11,20,23 The SO2 concentrations within the studied locations were also higher than the global limit concentrations allowed for long-term and short-term exposure, also previously reported.891011,20,23 The average concentration of NO2 was higher than the allowable limit recommended for long-term exposure.91011,21,23 However, the maximum concentration levels of NO2 that were recorded in the Al-Seeba station were also higher than the recommended concentrations allowed for short-term exposure, as previously reported.9,11

Figure 3.

PCA of the average concentrations of CO, CO2, NO2, SO2, and HCs in the ambient air of the seven selected stations in Basra city during the study period.

10.4137_ASWR.S10835-fig3.tif

Notes: Axis 1 accounted for 94.4%, axis 2 accounted for 100.0%, and axis 3 accounted for 100.0% of the total variance. Chloride (Cl-1) had strong positive loadings on axis 1, while sulfate (SO4-2) had negative loading on Axis 2.

Table 2.

Review of guidance intended to limit ambient air concentrations of CO, CO2, NO2, and SO2 concentrations (mg/L).

10.4137_ASWR.S10835-table2.tif

Health hazards associated with total HCs were mostly related to the proportion of petroleum hydrocarbon gases (PAHs) that conceded as carcinogenic pollutants.25 In terms of daily HC intake, the range would normally span from less than 10 ng to more than 100 ng.25 In general, the average concentrations of the HCs among the studied locations were high and fell within the hazard range for human and environment health.25 Generally, the concentrations of CO, NO2, SO2, and HCs recorded by the previous studies for the last ten years in the region were high. Al-Mayahi20 reported that CO concentrations ranged from 10 mg/L to 80 mg/L, while Al-Hassan23 stated that the average concentration was 27 mg/L. Al-Saad et al21 indicated that SO2 concentrations ranged from 10 mg/L to 15 mg/L. In Al-Hassan,23 the average concentration of CO2 and NO2 were 300 mg/L and 3 mg/L respectively. In addition, Al-Saad et al21 and Al-Hassen23 reported that the average HCs concentrations were 5 mg/L and 2 mg/L, respectively.

The current concentrations of measured gaseous pollutants in this study were lower than the levels indicated in the previous studies, especially the studies done during the first and second Gulf War. However, the relative reduction in the current concentrations of gaseous pollutants, which are primarily due to a lack of management and technical support of the secondary power plants, did not—with the exception of CO2 levels—prevent the temporal risk to human health in the Basra region, this according to European, American, Australian, and WHO guidelines.

Conclusion

The present data may serve as background levels of gaseous pollutant, as most industries currently are on halt. The survey indicates that the impacts from the remaining working electrical power plant in Al-Najibyia and from Abadan's oil refinery are significantly affecting the air quality in the Al-Ashar and Al-Seeba stations, respectively. The recent improvement of the local economy of Basra can play a significant role in changing the environmental structure of the city by building more industrial plants and expanding the original ones. Thus, these changes can have a direct affect not only on the atmosphere of the region but also on the water and soil.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: Sh A, HA. Analysed the data: Sh A. Wrote the first draft of the manuscript: SA. Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: SA, AD. Agree with manuscript results and conclusions: AD, SA, HA, Sh A. Jointly developed the structure and arguments for the paper: SA, AD. Made critical revisions and approved final version: AD, SA, HA, Sh A. All authors reviewed and approved of the final manuscript.

Funding

Author(s) disclose no funding sources.

Competing Interests

Author(s) disclose no potential conflicts of interest.

Disclosures and Ethics

As a requirement of publication author(s) have provided to the publisher signed confirmation of compliance with legal and ethical obligations including but not limited to the following: authorship and contribu-torship, conflicts of interest, privacy and confidentiality and (where applicable) protection of human and animal research subjects. The authors have read and confirmed their agreement with the ICMJE authorship and conflict of interest criteria. The authors have also confirmed that this article is unique and not under consideration or published in any other publication, and that they have permission from rights holders to reproduce any copyrighted material. Any disclosures are made in this section. The external blind peer reviewers report no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

The researchers wish to acknowledge the Marine Science Center (University of Basra) for providing laboratory facilities. We also acknowledge the effort of Mr. Tom Hill for English editing of the manuscript.

REFERENCES

1.

Vallero, D.A. Fundamentals of Air Pollution.4th ed.London: Elsevier Inc.; 2008. Google Scholar

2.

Ayres, J.G.Health effects of gaseous air pollutants. In: Hester, R.E.Harrison, R.M., editors. Air Pollution and Health. Cambridge: The Royal Society of Chemistry; 1998: 1–20. Google Scholar

3.

Schwela, D.Air pollution and health in urban areas. Rev Environ Health. 2000; 12(1-2): 13–42. Google Scholar

4.

Gittins, M.J. Air pollution. In: Bassett, W.H. Clay's Handbook of Environmental Health, 18th ed.London: E & FN Spon; 1999: 729–76. Google Scholar

5.

Megainey, C. Introduction to environmental protection. In.: Bassett, W.H. Clay's Handbook of Environmental Health. London: E & FN Spon; 1999: 684–703. Google Scholar

6.

Harrison, R.M. Air pollution: sources, concentrations and measurements. In: Harrison, R.M. Pollution: Causes, Effects and Control, 4th ed.Cambridge: RSC; 2001: 169–92. Google Scholar

7.

World Health Organization. Air Quality Guidelines for Particulate Matter, Ozone, Nitrogen Dioxide and Sulfur Dioxide: Global Update. Copenhagen: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe; 2005. Google Scholar

8.

Department of the Environment and Heritage. National Standards for Criteria Air Pollutions in Australia. Canberra: Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities; 2005. Google Scholar

9.

World Health Organization. Air Quality Guidelines for Europe, 2nd ed.Copenhagen: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe; 2000. Google Scholar

10.

Environmental Protection. The Air Quality Standards Regulations 2010.  http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2010/1001/made/data.pdf. Updated 2010. Google Scholar

11.

Bay Area Air Quality Management District. California Environmental Quality Act. Air Quality Guidelines. San Francisco: Bay Area Air Quality Management District; 2012. Google Scholar

12.

Gehring, U.Wijga, A.H.Brauer, M. Traffic-related air pollution and the development of asthma and allergies during the first 8 years of life. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010; 181(6): 596–603. Google Scholar

13.

Gasana, J.Dillikar, D.Mendy, A.Forno, E.Ramos Vieira, E.R.Motor vehicle air pollution and asthma in children: A meta-analysis. Environ Res. 2012; 117: 36–45. Google Scholar

14.

Raaschou-Nielsen, O.Andersen, Z.J.Hvidberg, M. Lung cancer incidence and long-term exposure to air pollution from traffic. Environ Health Perspect. 2011; 119(6): 860–5. Google Scholar

15.

Clapp, R.W.Jacobs, M.M.Loechler, E.L.Environmental and occupational causes of cancer: new evidence 2005-7. Rev Environ Health. 23(1): 1–37. Google Scholar

16.

Mateen, F.J.Brook, R.D.Air pollution as an emerging global risk factor for stroke. JAMA. 305(12): 1240–1. Google Scholar

17.

Andersen, Z.J.Kristiansen, L.C.Andersen, K.K. Stroke and long-term exposure to outdoor air pollution from nitrogen dioxide: a cohort study. Stroke. 2012: 43(2): 320–5. Google Scholar

18.

Anderson, H.R.Ponce, A.D.L.Bland, J.M.Bower, J.S.Strachan, D.P.Air pollution and daily mortality in London: 1987-92. BMJ. 1996; 312(7032): 665–9. Google Scholar

19.

Devra, D.L. When Smoke Ran Like Water: Tales of Environmental Deception and the Battle Against Pollution. New York: Basic Books; 2002. Google Scholar

20.

Al-Mayahi, I.K. An Environmental Analysis on the Factors Affecting the Air Pollutants Quality at Basra Province [dissertation]. Basra: College of Education, University of Basra; 2005. Google Scholar

21.

Al-Saad, H.T.Al-Imarah, F.J.M.Hassan, W.F.Jasim, A.H.Hassan, I.F.Determination of some trace elements in the fallen dust on Basra. Basrah Journal of Science. 2010; 28(2): 243–52. Google Scholar

22.

Garabedain, S.A.K.Levels of some trace metals in falling dust of Basra. Mesopotamian Journal of Marine Science. 2008; 23(2): 279–86. Google Scholar

23.

Al-Hassen, S.I. Environmental Pollution in Basra City [dissertation]. Basra: College of Arts, University of Basra; 2011. Google Scholar

24.

Braak, TCJF. CANOCO-a FORTRAN Program for Canonical Community Ordination. Microcomputer Power, Itaca, New York, USA; 1992. Google Scholar

25.

Larsen, J.C.Larsen, P.B. Chemical carcinogens. In: Hester, R.E.Harrison, R.M., editors. Air Pollution and Health. Cambridge: RSC; 1996: 44–52. Google Scholar
© 2013 SAGE Publications. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
Ali Abdul Zahra Douabul, Sama Sameer Al Maarofi, Hamid Talib Al-Saad, and Shukri Al-Hassen "Gaseous Pollutants in Basra City, Iraq," Air, Soil and Water Research 6(1), (1 January 2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/ASWR.S10835
Published: 1 January 2020
JOURNAL ARTICLE
PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top