Classical theory predicts a high demographic vulnerability and diminished performance of peripheral plant populations, but recent studies highlight the fact that environmental factors may override that geographical pattern. In this study, we compare the density, population structure and population dynamics of the boreo-alpine Silene acaulis (Caryophyllaceae) in two locations at its southern European distribution limit, using matrix projection models. One population was close to the species' lower altitudinal limit, and thus exposed to more ecologically marginal conditions (higher intraspecific competition and temperature) than the population higher up. The low-altitude population was sparser and its members were older as a result of lower recruitment and survival of new individuals. Additionally, this population's growth rate was lower, mainly due to a shorter permanence of large plants. The contrasting demographic differences between two closely located, southern peripheral populations highlight the importance of distinguishing between geographical periphery and ecological marginality.
You have requested a machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Neither BioOne nor the owners and publishers of the content make, and they explicitly disclaim, any express or implied representations or warranties of any kind, including, without limitation, representations and warranties as to the functionality of the translation feature or the accuracy or completeness of the translations.
Translations are not retained in our system. Your use of this feature and the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in the Terms and Conditions of Use of the BioOne website.
Vol. 53 • No. 3–4