Translator Disclaimer
1 April 2012 Should We Stay or Should We Go Now? What Happens to Small Mammals When Grass is Mown, and the Implications for Birds of Prey
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

With some raptors showing widespread declines, management of grassland to enhance access to their small mammal prey may be an important conservation tool. Many small mammal species prefer long grass as a habitat that offers protection from predation, and past studies on the consequences of grass cutting to small mammals have yielded mixed results. Using live trapping, we show that although mowing grass causes a rapid decline in small mammal captures, a small proportion of captures (20%–27%) still occurred in patches of mown grass immediately after cutting. This proportion more than halved again when the cut grass that was initially left in situ was removed. We conclude that some small mammals may remain in mown areas provided some form of cover — i.e. the cut grass — is present. These findings are discussed in light of agri-environment scheme options (e.g. grass margins) that could be improved to benefit birds of prey.

© Finnish Zoological and Botanical Publishing Board 2012
Claudia M. Garratt, Jeroen Minderman, and Mark J. Whittingham "Should We Stay or Should We Go Now? What Happens to Small Mammals When Grass is Mown, and the Implications for Birds of Prey," Annales Zoologici Fennici 49(1–2), 113-122, (1 April 2012). https://doi.org/10.5735/086.049.0111
Received: 18 May 2011; Accepted: 2 December 2011; Published: 1 April 2012
JOURNAL ARTICLE
10 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top