Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
31 January 2013 First Identification of Polymorphic Microsatellite Markers in the Burgundy Truffle, Tuber aestivum (Tuberaceae)
Virginie Molinier, Claude Murat, Emmanuelle Morin, Armelle Gollotte, Daniel Wipf, Francis Martin
Author Affiliations +

Truffles are edible ectomycorrhizal fungi belonging to the genus Tuber P. Micheli ex F. H. Wigg. and living in symbiosis with different host trees. More than 100 Tuber species exist in the world but only a few, such as T. magnatum Picco, T. melanosporum Vittad., and T. aestivum Vittad., have interesting organoleptic qualities. The first two species have a natural distribution restricted to limited European countries, but T. aestivum has a natural distribution across Europe. Previous studies utilizing random-amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) or intersimple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers and sequencing of a few genes suggested the existence of genetic diversity between T. aestivum populations (Gandeboeuf et al., 1997; Mello et al., 2002; Weden et al., 2004). However, the absence of codominant molecular markers, such as microsatellites or simple sequence repeats (SSRs), precluded the investigation of T. aestivum population genetics.

Recently, next-generation sequencing techniques have provided new prospects to develop microsatellite markers in nonmodel species, quickly and for relatively low costs (Abdelkrim et al., 2009; Csencsics et al., 2010; Perry and Rowe, 2011). Direct shotgun pyrosequencing (DSP) has been successfully used for the identification of microsatellites in animals or plants but, to our knowledge, this approach has never been used for ectomycorrhizal fungi. Recently the sequencing of the black truffle genome revealed a substantial richness in repeated sequences such as microsatellites (Murat et al., 2011). This result suggested that a DSP approach could be used for identifying microsatellites in Tuber species. The aim of our study was therefore to use DSP to identify, for the first time, polymorphic microsatellites in the economically important truffle T. aestivum.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Total genomic DNA was isolated from an ascocarp of T. aestivum harvested in Haute-Saône (France) (MD4) (Appendix 1, group A). DNA was extracted from frozen tissues with a cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) protocol available at the MYCORWEB website ( http://mycor.nancy.inra.fr/). A total of 150 µg of genomic DNA was sent to Genoscope (Evry, France). Direct shotgun sequencing occurred in a 1/2 plate optimized run of 454 GS-FLX Titanium and produced 534620 reads. The fasta and quality files generated were trimmed using the program “TrimSeq.pl” to trim raw sequencing reads at both ends based on moving averages of quality scores (phred = 20) and to remove reads smaller than 300 bp. After trimming and editing, 411374 reads corresponding to 195 Mbp were retained for microsatellite identification. MISA ( http://pgrc.ipk-gatersleben.de/misa/download/misa.pl) was used to identify di-, tri-, tetra-, penta-, and hexanucleotide simple sequence repeat markers. Using this software, a total of 7784 perfect microsatellites were identified (2519 di-, 3568 tri-, 1248 tetra-, 324 penta-, and 125 hexanucleotide repeat motifs). Using the MISA output files, only microsatellites beginning between 100 and 300 bp from the 5′ ends of the reads were selected. After this step, 181 microsatellites with more than 10 repeats were obtained. WebSat (Martins et al., 2009) and Primer3 (Rozen and Skaletsky, 2000) were respectively used to check repeats and to design primers for 40 microsatellites randomly selected among the 181 microsatellites previously obtained. The PCR feasibility was checked using OligoAnalyzer 3.1 ( http://eu.idtdna.com/analyzer/Applications/OligoAnalyzer/Default.aspx). Primers were tested in silico using AmplifX software ( http://crn2m.univ-mrs.fr/pub/amplifx-dist).

TABLE 1.

Characteristics of the primers developed in Tuber aestivum for the 15 selected microsatellites.

t01_01.gif

To evaluate the microsatellite primers in a PCR reaction, two T. aestivum ascocarps were used. DNA was extracted with a DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. All PCR amplifications were performed using 30 ng of template DNA in a final volume of 20 µL containing 10 × PCR buffer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA), 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen), 0.125 mM each of dNTPs, 0.5 µM each of forward and reverse primers, and sterile water to adjust to the final volume. PCRs were conducted in a Mastercycler Gradient S PCR system (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) after an initial denaturation of 3 min at 94°C, 30 cycles at 94°C for 25 s, 58°C for 25 s, and 72°C for 40 s, followed by 72°C for 15 min. PCR products were checked on a 1.5% agarose gel. According to Paolocci et al. (2006), the gleba of Tuber ascocarps is mainly composed of haploid maternal tissue and the DNA extracted from ascocarps therefore corresponds to a haploid tissue. For this reason, only the microsatellites producing a single band signal were selected for future investigations. Twenty-five primer pairs (62.5%) resulted in good amplification (i.e., one band for both ascocarps).

To identify polymorphic microsatellites, the 25 retained primer pairs were tested with 14 T. aestivum samples from different European countries (Appendix 1, group B). Genomic DNA from the 14 ascocarps was isolated from 20 mg of dried gleba as described above. PCR conditions were the same as those described above. PCR products were separated on a 4% agarose gel. Fifteen out of the 25 microsatellites (60%) showed size polymorphisms on 4% agarose gel. To assess more precisely the level of polymorphism, 15 microsatellites were used to perform a genotyping analysis using 5′ end-labeled primers (FAM or VIC) (Table 1). Seventy-five samples from seven European populations (Appendix 1, group C) were chosen to perform preliminary genotyping. PCR products were assayed, using 500 LIZ as a size standard, on an ABI 3730XL sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA) at the “Plateforme de Génotypage GENTYANE” (Clermont-Ferrand, France). All amplifications were carried out individually. Allele sizes were analyzed with GeneMapper (Applied Biosystems). Expected heterozygosity (He) was calculated using GenAlEx (Peakall and Smouse, 2006) (Table 2). As expected, due to the haploid nature of the ascocarp (Paolocci et al., 2006), each locus gave only one peak for all 75 samples. The number of different alleles per locus ranged from four to 15, and He ranged from 0.266 to 0.620. Finally, 63 different multilocus genotypes were obtained from the 75 T. aestivum isolates.

CONCLUSIONS

A DSP approach on a single T. aestivum ascocarp allowed for the identification of 7784 perfect microsatellites for 195 Mbp (nearly 40 microsatellites per Mbp). To our knowledge, our study is the first report of DSP to identify nuclear polymorphic microsatellite markers in an ectomycorrhizal fungal species. Indeed, until now, the DSP approach has only been performed on organisms belonging to the Animalia and Plantae kingdoms. This method is very quick and relatively inexpensive compared to the enriched library methods commonly used to develop polymorphic microsatellites. Indeed, with only 1/2 plate of a pyrosequencing run, we were able to identify several thousand microsatellites. DSP is therefore a useful approach to characterize polymorphic markers for nonmodel species. The markers developed in this study will enable future population genetic studies for this truffle species. Moreover, from a commercial point of view, population genetic studies could be useful to label some remarkable ecotypes showing particular alleles. Indeed, because the price of this truffle continues to increase and varies depending on geographical origin, a certificate of “true geographical origin” could be used to avoid fraud in the commercial truffle market.

TABLE 2.

Genotyping of the 15 microsatellites for 75 truffle samples belonging to seven Tuber aestivum populations.*

t02_01.gif

LITERATURE CITED

1.

J. Abdelkrim , B. Robertson , J. A. Stanton , and N. Gemmell . 2009. Fast, cost-effective development of species-specific microsatellite markers by genomic sequencing. BioTechniques 46: 185–192. Google Scholar

2.

D. Csencsics , S. Brodbeck , and R. Holderegger . 2010. Cost-effective, species-specific microsatellite development for the endangered dwarf bulrush (Typha minima) using next-generation sequencing technology. Journal of Heredity 101: 789–793. Google Scholar

3.

D. Gandeboeuf , C. Dupré , G. Chevalier , P. Roeckel-Drevet , and P. Nicolas . 1997. Grouping and identification of Tuber species using RAPD markers. Canadian Journal of Botany 75: 36–-5. Google Scholar

4.

W. S. Martins , D. C. S. Lucas , K. F. S. Neves , and D. J. Bertioli . 2009. WebSat: A Web software for microsatellite marker development. Bioinformation 3: 282–283. Google Scholar

5.

A. Mello , A. Cantisani , A. Vizzini , and P. Bonfante . 2002. Genetic variability of Tuber uncinatum and its relatedness to other black truffles. Environmental Microbiology 4: 584–594. Google Scholar

6.

C. Murat , C. Riccioni , B. Belfiori , N. Cichocki , J. Labbé , E. Morin , E. Tisserant , et al. 2011. Distribution and localization of microsatellites in the Perigord black truffle genome and identification of new molecular markers. Fungal Genetics and Biology 48: 592–601. Google Scholar

7.

F. Paolocci , A. Rubini , C. Riccioni , and S. Arcioni . 2006. Reevaluation of the life cycle of Tuber magnatum. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 72: 2390–2393. Google Scholar

8.

R. Peakall , and P. E. Smouse . 2006. GenAlEx 6: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes 6: 288–295. Google Scholar

9.

J. C. Perry , and L. Rowe . 2011. Rapid microsatellite development for water striders by next-generation sequencing. Journal of Heredity 102: 125–129. Google Scholar

10.

S. Rozen , and H. Skaletsky . 2000. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. In S. Misener and S. A. Krawetz [eds.], Methods in molecular biology, vol. 132: Bioinformatics methods and protocols, 365–386. Humana Press, Totowa, New Jersey, USA. Google Scholar

11.

C Wedén , E. Danell , F. J. Camacho , and A. Backlund . 2004. The population of the hypogeous fungus Tuber aestivum syn. T. uncinatum on the island of Gotland. Mycorrhiza 14: 19–23. Google Scholar

Appendices

APPENDIX 1.

Locality information of the different samples and populations of Tuber aestivum used in this study.

tA01_01.gif

Notes

[1] The authors thank Genoscope for financing the Tuber aestivum genome sequencing in the TUBEREVOL project. The work presented was also supported by the Conseil Régional de Bourgogne (Program Jeune Chercheur Entrepreneur; grant 20100112095254682-1 ). The authors thank G. Chevalier, H. Frochot, P. Déquéant, and D. Besson for providing T. aestivum samples. The authors thank the strategic platform “GENTYANE” INRA, Ibisa 2009, and its group leader C. Poncet. The authors thank Krista Plett for English editing of this manuscript.

Virginie Molinier, Claude Murat, Emmanuelle Morin, Armelle Gollotte, Daniel Wipf, and Francis Martin "First Identification of Polymorphic Microsatellite Markers in the Burgundy Truffle, Tuber aestivum (Tuberaceae)," Applications in Plant Sciences 1(2), (31 January 2013). https://doi.org/10.3732/apps.1200220
Received: 4 May 2012; Accepted: 1 August 2012; Published: 31 January 2013
KEYWORDS
direct shotgun pyrosequencing
polymorphism
truffle
Tuber aestivum
Tuberaceae
Back to Top