Translator Disclaimer
10 July 2014 Characterization of Fungus-Specific Microsatellite Markers in the Lichen Fungus Usnea subfloridana (Parmeliaceae)
Author Affiliations +

Conspicuous epiphytic lichens like beard lichens (Usnea Dill. ex Adans.) are valuable indicators of forest ecosystems, hence contributing to monitoring the conservation value of forest landscapes (Will-Wolf et al., 2002). Usnea subfloridana Stirton is a widely distributed species occurring in Europe (Tõrra and Randlane, 2007; Randlane et al., 2009), appearing from the northern boreal to temperate regions (Halonen et al., 1998). The sexually reproducing U. florida (L.) Weber ex F. H. Wigg. and U. subfloridana, which has a predominantly asexual reproduction with symbiotic propagules, represent a typical species pair, as they share many morphological characters but differ by the characters associated with their dissimilar dispersal strategies (Articus et al., 2002; Randlane et al., 2009). Here, we develop 14 microsatellite markers to study the impact of land use and habitat fragmentation on the lichen's dispersal and population subdivision.


We selected three U. subfloridana specimens sampled from Norway, Finland, and Lithuania and two U. florida specimens sampled from the United Kingdom (Appendix 1). The central axis, which is of pure fungal origin (haploid), was manually separated and used for DNA extraction with the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Library preparation and whole genome 454 pyrosequencing of pooled DNA samples was performed by Microsynth (Balgach, Switzerland) using a Roche GS FLX sequencer to generate enough random sequences and to isolate a sufficient number of microsatellite loci. Shotgun libraries were prepared using the GS FLX Titanium Rapid Library Preparation Kit (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland), and Microsynth provided barcode adapters. We obtained 85,718 reads with an average length of 391 bases and a total of 27,344,042 bases out of a 2/16th run. We screened for all sequence motifs of di-, tri-, tetra-, and pentanucleotide microsatellites in the unassembled reads using MSATCOMMANDER 1.0.2 alpha (Faircloth, 2008). Microsatellites with motifs repeated at least eight times (for di- and trinucleotides) or six times (for all others) were selected. Primer pairs were developed with Primer3 (Rozen and Skaletsky, 2000), implemented in the software MSATCOMMANDER 1.0.2 alpha using the default parameters except for the following: optimal primer size 20 bp, product size 150–450 bp, melting temperature (Tm) 58–65°C. We found 132 primer pairs that fulfilled the specified primer parameters, but 68 pairs were later discarded either because they were duplicates, which were detected after alignment using CLC DNA Workbench 5 (CLC bio, Aarhus, Denmark), or because they contained mononucleotide repeats in the flanking region.

Additionally, we set up axenic algal cell cultures of the photobiont of U. subfloridana to assess the symbiont specificity of the newly designed markers. The culture was established under sterile conditions on 1/4 of strength of original Trebouxia Organic Nutrient Medium–I according to Ahmadjian (1967). Algal cells were taken from the algal layer of U. subfloridana thalli and inoculated on the medium. The cultivation took place under diurnal light (12 h) and darkness (12 h) for four months before the algal culture was harvested and deposited at the Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL (cultures TTA1 and TTA2) at −80°C. Algal cells were disrupted and DNA was extracted with MO BIO PowerPlant DNA Isolation Kit (MO BIO Laboratories, Carlsbad, California, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The three loci that produced positive PCR reactions were excluded from further analyses because they were considered alga-specific rather than fungus-specific. For PCR amplification, forward primers were labeled with an M13 tag (5′-TGTAAAACGACGGCCAGT-3′) (Schuelke, 2000). PCR reactions were performed in a total volume of 10 µL containing 1 µL of ∼1–5 ng genomic DNA, 0.5 µL of 5 µM forward and reverse primers, and 2× Type-it Multiplex PCR Master Mix (QIAGEN). All PCRs were performed on Veriti Thermal Cyclers (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, California, USA). The PCR reactions were assessed using a temperature gradient with one-degree increments from 56–61°C, and under the following conditions: denaturation for 5 min at 95°C, followed by 33 cycles of 30 s at 95°C, 90 s at 56–61°C, and 30 s at 72°C; then for the M13-tag binding an additional eight cycles of 30 s at 95°C, 90 s at 53°C, and 30 s at 72°C, with a final extension of 30 min at 60°C were run.

Only primers failing to amplify with DNA extracted from the axenic algal culture were considered of fungal origin. These 61 primers were tested for variability under the same conditions as above and using the total DNA of eight specimens of U. subfloridana collected from EVO population from southern Estonia (Appendix 1), resulting in 14 loci with satisfactory amplification. Cross-species amplification of two closely related species (Saag et al., 2011) was tested with 12 specimens of U. glabrescens (Vainio) Vainio and 14 specimens of U. wasmuthii Räsänen, which were collected from the same site. Approximately 50 mg dry weight of each lichen thallus was lyophilized overnight and ground in a Retsch MM2000 mixer mill (Düsseldorf, Germany) for 3 min at 30 Hz, and total DNA was extracted with the same procedure as the algal cells.

To characterize the 14 polymorphic U. subfloridana loci (Table 1), we analyzed PCR products of 174 individuals from three populations (Table 2, Appendix 1). Fluorescent forward primers were used for the PCR protocol and the reaction was adjusted to: 5 min at 95°C, followed by 28 cycles of 30 s at 95°C, 90 s at 57°C, and 30 s at 72°C, with a final extension of 80 min at 60°C. PCR products were multiplexed (Table 1) and run on a 3130x1 DNA Analyzer with GeneScan 500 LIZ Size Standard (G5 dye set) for fragment analysis (both by Life Technologies). Alleles were determined using GeneMapper version 3.7 (Life Technologies). To characterize the variability of each microsatellite locus, we counted the number of alleles and calculated Nei's unbiased gene diversity using Arlequin version 3.11 (Excoffier et al., 2005).

Table 1.

Characteristics of 14 microsatellite loci developed for the lichen fungus Usnea subfloridana.a


Table 2.

Characteristics of nine polymorphic microsatellite loci developed for Usnea subfloridana a and screened in 174 individuals.


Sequences of the 14 polymorphic loci were deposited in GenBank as they appear in the original pyrosequencing sample (Table 1). Five loci (Us10–Us14) had more than 10% of null alleles, possibly because of mutations in the primer regions, and were therefore omitted from the population analyses. The nine microsatellite loci that had no null alleles (Us1–Us9) produced three to 15 alleles per locus with a mean of 8.78. Nei's unbiased gene diversity, averaged over nine markers, ranged from 0.64 to 0.67 (Table 2). After PCR optimization for the annealing temperature (Table 1), all nine primers successfully amplified and were polymorphic in U. subfloridana, U. wasmuthii, and U. glabrescens, except marker Us07, which showed no polymorphy in U. glabrescens. As is often the case in populations of highly clonal organisms such as lichens (Walser et al., 2004; Dal Grande et al., 2012), significant linkage disequilibrium was found using Arlequin version 3.11 in 41 U. subfloridana distinct multilocus genotypes for two pairs of markers (i.e., Us02-Us06 and Us05-Us08).


The manual separation of the purely fungal central axis of the genus Usnea did not provide pure fungal DNA as expected. This preparation led to mixed DNA of the two fungal and algal symbionts and thus symbiont-specificity of genetic markers has to be tested in lichens (Devkota et al., 2014) even if lichens contain purely fungal plectenchyma. The newly developed, highly variable fungus-specific markers are currently being used to study the genetic differentiation and diversity in U. subfloridana, U. florida, and related species and will allow us to investigate effects of forest management and environmental pollution on genetic population structure in epiphytic lichens.


  1. V. Ahmadjian 1967. The lichen symbiosis. Blaisdell Publishing Co., Waltham, Massachusetts, USA. Google Scholar

  2. K. Articus , J.-E. Mattsson , L. Tibell , M. Grube , and M. Wedin . 2002. Ribosomal DNA and β-tubulin data do not support the separation of the lichens Usnea florida and U. subfloridana as distinct species. Mycological Research 106: 412–418. Google Scholar

  3. F. Dal Grande , I. Widmer , H. H. Wagner , and C. Scheidegger . 2012. Vertical and horizontal photobiont transmission within populations of a lichen symbiosis. Molecular Ecology 21: 3159–3172. Google Scholar

  4. S. Devkota , C. Cornejo , S. Werth , R. P. Chaudhary , and C. Scheidegger . 2014. Characterization of microsatellite loci in the Himalayan lichen fungus Lobaria pindarensis (Lobariaceae). Applications in Plant Sciences 2: 1300101. Google Scholar

  5. L. Excoffier , G. Laval , and S. Schneider . 2005. Arlequin ver. 3.0: An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online 1: 47–50. Google Scholar

  6. B. C. Faircloth 2008. MSATCOMMANDER: Detection of microsatellite repeat arrays and automated, locus-specific primer design. Molecular Ecology Resources 8: 92–94. Google Scholar

  7. P. Halonen , P. Clerc , T. Goward , I. Brodo , and K. Wulff . 1998. Synopsis of the genus Usnea (lichenized Ascomycetes) in British Columbia, Canada. Bryologist 101: 36–60. Google Scholar

  8. T. Randlane , T. Tõrra , A. Saag , and L. Saag . 2009. Key to European Usnea species. Bibliotheca Lichenologica 100: 433–478. Google Scholar

  9. S. Rozen , and H. J. Skaletsky . 2000. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. In S. Misener and S. A. Krawetz [eds.], Methods in molecular biology, vol. 132: Bioinformatics methods and protocols, 365–386. Humana Press, Totowa, New Jersey, USA. Google Scholar

  10. L. Saag , T. Tõrra , A. Saag , R. Del-Prado , and T. Randlane . 2011. Phylogenetic relations of European shrubby taxa of the genus Usnea. Lichenologist (London, England) 43: 427–44. Google Scholar

  11. M. Schuelke 2000. An economic method for the fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments. Nature Biotechnology 18: 233–234. Google Scholar

  12. T. Tõrra , and T. Randlane . 2007. The lichen genus Usnea (lichenized Ascomycetes, Parmeliaceae) in Estonia with a key to the species in the Baltic countries. Lichenologist (London, England) 39: 415–438. Google Scholar

  13. J. C. Walser , F. Gugerli , R. Holderegger , D. Kuonen , and C. Scheidegger . 2004. Recombination and clonal propagation in different populations of the lichen Lobaria pulmonaria. Heredity 93: 322–329. Google Scholar

  14. S. Will-Wolf , P. A. Esseen , and P. Neitlich . 2002. Monitoring biodiversity and ecosystem function: Forests. In P. L. Nimis , C. Scheidegger , and P. A. Wolseley [eds.], Monitoring with lichens— Monitoring lichens, vol. 7, 203–222. NATO Science Series IV Earth and Environmental Sciences. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany. Google Scholar


Appendix 1.

Location information, number of individuals sampled, and voucher specimens of Usnea species used in this study.



[1] The authors thank the Genetic Diversity Centre, ETH Zurich, for technical assistance. This study was supported by a fellowship to T.T. (Sciex project 10.005) and grants from the Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN) to C.S. Fieldwork in Estonia was financed by the Estonian Science Foundation (grant 9109) to Tiina Randlane.

Tiiu Tõrra, Carolina Cornejo, Saran Cheenacharoen, Francesco Dal Grande, Liis Marmor, and Christoph Scheidegger "Characterization of Fungus-Specific Microsatellite Markers in the Lichen Fungus Usnea subfloridana (Parmeliaceae)," Applications in Plant Sciences 2(7), (10 July 2014).
Received: 5 April 2014; Accepted: 1 May 2014; Published: 10 July 2014

Back to Top