Translator Disclaimer
5 January 2015 Fourteen Polymorphic Microsatellite Markers for the Threatened Arnica montana (Asteraceae)
Author Affiliations +

Arnica montana L. (Asteraceae) is an important medicinal plant species (in traditional, classical, and homeopathic medicine) that is endemic to heath and grassland habitats of Europe. It is a predominantly self-incompatible, insect-pollinated species that is commonly visited by syrphid flies (Luijten et al., 1996, 2000). Arnica montana is still common in some mountain areas, but habitat fragmentation, eutrophication, acidification, abandonment of traditional agricultural practices, and flower picking for medicinal purposes has led to a rapid decrease in population sizes during the past decades, especially at lower altitudes (Dueck and Elderson, 1992; de Graaf et al., 1998; Fabiszewski and Wojtun, 2001; Falniowski et al., 2013). Although its threat category has been assessed as “least concern” in the 2014 IUCN Red List, the general trend is that population sizes are declining (Falniowski et al., 2013) and the species is classified as “endangered” in the national red list of vascular plants of Germany (Korneck et al., 1996).

Analysis of population genetic structure, gene flow, and levels of inbreeding will provide valuable insights for the effective conservation of declining populations. Here, we present a set of microsatellite markers for A. montana as a tool for population and conservation genetic studies.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Plant material and DNA extraction—Plant material of A. montana was collected in five different geographic regions comprising the lowlands and midelevation mountain ranges of Germany (German states of Saxony, Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, Brandenburg, and Baden-Württemberg) and the Italian Alps (South Tyrol). The populations were chosen to represent the species' spatial distribution in central Europe from the Southern Alps up to the Baltic. Of each population, five individuals were collected and genomic DNA was extracted from silica gel-dried leaves using the NucleoSpin Plant II kit (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) following the manufacturer's instructions. Purified DNA was eluted in a final volume of 100 µL, and final concentration was quantified using a NanoDrop ND-1000 Spectrophotometer (Peqlab, Erlangen, Germany) and gel electrophoresis.

Microsatellite marker development—The GS FLX Titanium Rapid Library Preparation Kit and the GS Junior Titanium Sequencing Kit (Roche 454 Life Sciences, Branford, Connecticut, USA) were used to generate a shotgun library of genomic DNA and sequencing on the Roche GS Junior 454 System (Roche 454 Life Sciences). The 454 pyrosequencing yielded a total of 56,545 sequence reads ranging from 40 to 1195 bp with an average length of 476 bp.

To obtain a larger number of polymorphic markers, we additionally developed and sequenced a microsatellite-enriched library. Size-selected genomic DNA fragments were enriched for microsatellite content by using magnetic streptavidin beads and biotin-labeled GATA, GTAT, AAAC, and AAAG repeat oligonucleotides. The enriched library was prepared and analyzed on a Roche 454 platform using the GS FLX Titanium reagents according to the manufacturer's manual. This produced 14,467 sequence reads ranging from 80 to 550 bp with an average length of 459 bp.

Microsatellite screening—The screening of the generated DNA sequences from the nonenriched shotgun library for microsatellite loci and the design of oligonucleotide PCR primers was conducted with QDD software version 2.1 (Meglecz et al., 2010). A total of 1197 microsatellite loci, containing di-, tri-, tetra-, penta-, and hexanucleotide repeat motifs, with a GC content of 35–60% and a melting temperature (Tm) ranging from 57°C to 60°C were identified. A total of 60 microsatellite loci with at least five repeats, including six loci with hexanucleotide repeats, two loci with pentanucleotide repeats, three loci with tetranucleotide repeats, 35 loci with trinucleotide repeats, and 14 loci with dinucleotide repeats, were tested for proper PCR amplification using genomic DNA.

The sequences obtained with the enriched library contained 676 sequences with microsatellite inserts. Using a Primer3-based (Koressaar and Remm, 2007; Untergasser et al., 2012) custom-made software (property of Ecogenics, Zurich, Switzerland), 361 reads were suitable for designing primers with a GC content of 20–80% and a Tm ranging from 57°C to 63°C. Of these loci, 24 were selected for screening. All of the selected loci had at least six repeat units in the case of tri- and tetranucleotide repeat motifs or at least 10 repeat units in the case of dinucleotide repeat motifs.

For assessing optimal annealing temperatures, a gradient PCR with annealing temperatures varying between 53°C and 63°C was carried out for each primer pair in a 15.6-µL reaction volume containing 20–40 ng DNA, 0.16 µM of each forward and reverse primer (Eurofins MWG Operon, Ebersberg, Germany), 1× TaqBuffer S (PeqLab), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.25 mM of each dNTP, and 0.03 units Hot Taq polymerase (PeqLab). For all primer pairs, the temperature profile of the PCR was as follows: 95°C for 1 min; 30 cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 58°C ± 5°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min; plus a final extension of 72°C for 7 min. Amplification of PCR was evaluated by visual inspection of gel electrophoresis.

For assessing polymorphism of the microsatellite markers, genomic DNA templates from 25 A. montana specimens of five distinct populations were used (five specimens per population; Appendix 1). PCR amplification was performed using forward primers labeled with fluorescent dyes (FAM, YakimaYellow, ATTO 565, and ATTO 550) and reverse primers (Armo01–Armo03) with a 7-bp (GTTTCTT) extension at the 5′-end to reduce stutter bands (“PIG-tailing”; Brownstein et al., 1996). The PCR products were sent to Macrogen Europe (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) for fragment analysis on an ABI 3730 sequencer.

Table 1.

Characteristics of the 14 microsatellite loci for Arnica montana.

t01_01.gif

Of 60 markers that were tested, only three markers turned out to be polymorphic: Armo01, Armo02, and Armo03 (Table 1). The remaining microsatellite markers were either monomorphic, failed to amplify consistently, or were difficult to score unambiguously.

Of 24 selected candidate primer pairs from the microsatellite-enriched library, 11 (Arm01-Arm11) were found to be polymorphic, with at least four alleles per locus (Table 1).

Microsatellite marker data analysis—Genotypes were scored by analyzing the electropherograms from the fragment analysis using GeneMarker version 1.95 (SoftGenetics, State College, Pennsylvania, USA). The fragments were scored relative to a GeneScan 500 LIZ Size Standard (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, California, USA). Descriptive statistics (number of alleles, observed and expected heterozygosities) were calculated with GenAlEx 6.5 (Peakall and Smouse, 2006). All 14 loci were polymorphic with four to 11 alleles across 25 individuals from five different populations with a total number of 102 alleles. Observed heterozygosity values ranged from 0.200 to 0.880 and expected heterozygosity from 0.192 to 0.648. Linkage disequilibrium was tested using GENEPOP (Raymond and Rousset, 1995), and the test revealed no significant association between the loci. CERVUS 3.0 (Marshall et al., 1998) was used to calculate the polymorphism information content (PIC) (Table 2) and deviations from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Three loci (Arm04, Arm07, and Arm 10) significantly deviated from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium after Bonferroni correction.

CONCLUSIONS

The 14 microsatellite markers reported in this study, developed using both enriched and nonenriched DNA libraries, are highly polymorphic with allele numbers ranging between four and 11. These markers will provide a valuable tool for genetic studies on large-scale and fine-scale population genetic structure, as well as on levels of inbreeding in A. montana. This study also demonstrates that the use of microsatellite-enriched DNA libraries allows a more efficient development of microsatellite loci as shown before (Lepais and Bacles, 2011).

Table 2.

Genetic properties of the developed microsatellites of specimens from five populations of Arnica montana.

t02_01.gif

LITERATURE CITED

  1. M. Brownstein , J. Carpten , and J. Smith . 1996. Modulation of non-templated nucleotide addition by Taq DNA polymerase: Primer modifications that facilitate genotyping. BioTechniques 20: 1004–1010. Google Scholar

  2. M. C. de Graaf , R. Bobbink , J. G. M. Roelofs , and P. J. M. Verbeek . 1998. Differential effects of ammonium and nitrate on three heathland species. Plant Ecology 135: 185–196. Google Scholar

  3. T. A. Dueck , and J. Elderson . 1992. Influence of NH, and SO2 on the growth and competitive ability of Arnica montana L. and Viola canina L. New Phytologist 122: 507–514. Google Scholar

  4. J. Fabiszewski , and B. Wojtun . 2001. Contemporary floristic changes in the Karkonosze Mts. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae 70: 237–245. Google Scholar

  5. A. Falniowski , I. Bazos , I. Hodálová , R. Landsdown , and A. Petrova . 2013. Arnica montana. In IUCN 2013. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2014.2. Website  http://www.iucnredlist.org [accessed 22 September 2014]. Google Scholar

  6. T. Koressaar , and M. Remm . 2007. Enhancements and modifications of primer design program Primer3. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 23: 1289–1291. Google Scholar

  7. D. Korneck , M. Schnittler , and I. Vollmer . 1996. Rote Liste der Farnund Blütenpflanzen (Peridophyta et Spermatophyta) Deutschlands. In G. Ludwig and M. Schnittler [eds.]. Rote Liste gefährdeter Pflanzen Deutschlands, 21–187. Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Bonn-Bad Godesberg, Germany. Google Scholar

  8. O. Lepais , and C. F. E. Bacles . 2011. Comparison of random and SSR-enriched shotgun pyrosequencing for microsatellite discovery and single multiplex PCR optimization in Acacia harpophylla F. Muell. ex Benth. Molecular Ecology Resources 11: 711–724. Google Scholar

  9. S. H. Luijten , J. G. B. Oostermeijer , N. C. van Leeuwen , and H. C. M. den Nijs . 1996. Reproductive success and clonal genetic structure of the rare Arnica montana (Compositae) in The Netherlands. Plant Systematics and Evolution 201: 15–30. Google Scholar

  10. S. H. Luijten , A. Dierick , J. Gerard , B. Oostermeijer , L. E. L. Raijmann , and H. C. M. Den Nijs . 2000. Population size, genetic variation, and reproductive success in a rapidly declining, self-incompatible perennial (Arnica montana) in The Netherlands. Conservation Biology 14: 1776–1787. Google Scholar

  11. T. Marshall , J. Slate , L. E. B. Kruuk , and J. M. Pemberton . 1998. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Molecular Ecology 7: 639–655. Google Scholar

  12. E. Meglecz , C. Costedoat , V. Dubut , A. Gilles , T. Malausa , N. Pech , and J.-F. Martin . 2010. QDD: A user-friendly program to select microsatellite markers and design primers from large sequencing projects. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 26: 403–404. Google Scholar

  13. R. Peakall , and P. E. Smouse . 2006. GenAlEx 6: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Molecular Ecology Notes 6: 288–295. Google Scholar

  14. M. Raymond , and F. Rousset . 1995. GENEPOP (version 1.2): Population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity 86: 248–249. Google Scholar

  15. A. Untergasser , I. Cutcutache , T. Koressaar , J. Ye , B. C. Faircloth , M. Remm , and S. G. Rozen . 2012. Primer3—New capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Research 40: e115. Google Scholar

Appendices

Appendix 1.

Locations and voucher information for populations of Arnica montana used in this study.a

tA01_01.gif

Notes

[1] The authors would like to thank H. Fleischer-Notter and S. Trotzer for technical assistance. We also thank S. Mbedi and the Berlin Center for Genomics in Biodiversity Research (BeGenDiv) for performing the 454 pyrosequencing. The work was financed by the Federal Agency for Nature Conservation (BfN) as part of the project “Integration of ex situ and in situ measures for the conservation of endangered flowering plants in Germany.” This is publication number 007 of BeGenDiv.

Virginia K. Duwe, Sascha A. Ismail, Andres Buser, Esther Sossai, Thomas Borsch, and Ludo A. H. Muller "Fourteen Polymorphic Microsatellite Markers for the Threatened Arnica montana (Asteraceae)," Applications in Plant Sciences 3(1), (5 January 2015). https://doi.org/10.3732/apps.1400091
Received: 23 September 2014; Accepted: 1 November 2014; Published: 5 January 2015
JOURNAL ARTICLE
PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top