Translator Disclaimer
1 August 2004 Reduction of the Ambient UV-B Radiation in the High-Arctic Increases Fv/Fm in Salix arctica and Vaccinium uliginosum and Reduces Stomatal Conductance and Internal CO2 Concentration in Salix arctica
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

This study investigates effects of reducing the ambient UV radiation on gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence of two shrub species, Salix arctica and Vaccinium uliginosum, in a high arctic heath in Northeast Greenland in July and August. On two sites films, Mylar and Lexan, were used to reduce UV-B radiation and UV-B + A radiation, respectively. A UV transparent film, Teflon, and no film were used as controls. Field measurements showed that the plants under Teflon, Mylar, and Lexan received approximately 91, 39, and 17% of the ambient UV-B irradiance, respectively. Reduced UV radiation increased maximal photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm) in both species. The responses varied in significance according to species, sites and time of growing season. Net assimilation (Pn), measured as net CO2 uptake, was not significantly affected. But over the whole growing season stomatal conductance and intercellular CO2concentration were decreased by both UV treatments. The underlying mechanisms for these results are discussed. PAR-irradiance had a negative influence on the absolute values of Fv/Fm. A positive correlation was found between Fv/Fm and Pn measured at ambient CO2-level. It is concluded that it cannot be excluded, that the observed short-term effects could result in long-term negative effects on growth and survival for the investigated species.

Introduction

A depletion of stratospheric ozone has occurred over the last 25 yrs. (Searles et al., 2001) and concurrently the irradiance of ultraviolet-B (UV-B, 280–315 nm [CIE, 1999]) radiation has increased on the earth's surface (Herman et al., 1996; Dahlback, 2002). Effects of UV-B, both direct and indirect and on different organizational levels, on sensitive vegetation and ecosystems have been reported (see e.g., Sullivan and Rozema, 1999; Björn, 2002). At high latitudes not only the relative increase in UV-B has been occurring most rapidly but also the absolute net depletion of ozone has been highest resulting in the potentially highest impact on the vegetation there (Björn et al., 1999; Pyle, 1997; Paul, 2001). The longevity of arctic plants makes them adapt only slowly (Callaghan and Jonasson, 1995) for which reason acclimation is of special importance when facing changes in the environment. Because of the short growing season and low temperatures arctic plants are already extremely acclimated to climate (e.g., Bliss, 1997). Furthermore, some of these acclimations increase the sensitivity to UV-B, such as a fast spring growth rate, a high ratio of unsaturated against saturated fatty acids and a slow photo reactivation (Rousseaux et al., 2001; Li et al., 2002, Björn, 2002). As an overall result, effects of even small changes in the UV-B level are likely to occur in arctic vegetation.

In this experiment we wanted to investigate effects of the present ambient UV radiation on high arctic vegetation and to study possible seasonal variation of these effects. The manipulative approach chosen was to reduce the UV-radiation dose on the vegetation by means of filters. As photosynthetic processes integrate many of the proposed direct and indirect UV effects (see e.g., Sullivan and Rozema, 1999), the investigations were focused on the effect of these treatments on the photosynthetic apparatus. As nondestructive measurements were needed, measurements were concentrated on net leaf photosynthesis and fast kinetics chlorophyll fluorescence. Thus, effects on maximal photochemical efficiency (Fv/Fm) and ambient and potential net photosynthesis, measured as CO2 flux, were studied. The overall hypothesis was that if the vegetation has not been fully acclimated to the present UV radiation, reductions in the irradiance load would improve the photosynthetic performance of the plants.

Materials and Methods

EXPERIMENTAL SITE

The fieldwork was carried out in a High Arctic heathland (Zackenberg Research Station, Northeast Greenland, 74°N; 21°E) in July and August 2001. The mean air temperature was 4.9 and 5.8°C in July and August, respectively. The annual precipitation was 236 mm w.eq., falling mostly as snow during winter (DPC, 2003).

The plant species investigated were Salix arctica Pall. and Vaccinium uliginosum L., ssp. microphyllum Lge., comprising ca. 20 and 60% of the vegetation cover, respectively, and having broad, flat leaves well suited for physiological measurements.

EXPERIMENTAL SET-UP AND TREATMENTS

The aim was to establish plots where parts of the UV spectrum in natural daylight were reduced with ambient UV irradiance as reference. Reductions were achieved by filtering the solar radiation through two different filters, Mylar® (type D. DuPont Teijin Films, Wilmington, Delaware, USA) and Lexan® (RIAS, Roskilde, Denmark). As control Teflon® filter (Fluoretek AB, Knivsta, Sweden.) was adopted. Teflon is referred to as “filter control,” Mylar as “–UV-B,” and Lexan as “–UV-AB”. A fourth treatment was a control without any filter.

Two sampling sites were chosen, in the following named site 1 and 2, and filters were placed parallel to the soil surface 5 cm above canopy by means of 40 cm × 60 cm aluminium frames. The experiment was designed as a randomized block design where each site consisted of four experimental plots (replicates) of each treatment, in total 16 plots per site. Both sites were south-facing slopes, chosen to maximize the incoming amount of radiation and to make possible that the plots could benefit from uphill precipitation. Site 1 was marginally sloping (approx. 5°) while the inclination of site 2 was much steeper (approx. 45°).

MEASUREMENTS

Filter transmittance for UV-A and UV-B was analyzed by a spectrophotometer (Cary 50, Varian Inc.). Measurements in the experimental area were done with a broadband cosine corrected UV-B sensor (UV-S-310-T, Scintec, Atmosphärenmesstechnik GmbH, Tübingen, Germany—now manufactured as UV-S-B-T by Kipp & Zonen B.V., Delft, The Netherlands).

During the sampling period measurements of maximal photochemical efficiency, measured as chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv/Fm), were at each site done every third day and weekly on S. arctica and V. uliginosum, respectively. Measurements of net photosynthesis (Pn), measured as leaf gas exchange, were done weekly at site 1 on S. arctica.

After dark adaptation for a minimum of 25 min (most often 30–40 min) of the leaves, chlorophyll fluorescence was measured with a Handy PEA (Hansatech Instruments, Ltd. King's Lynn, Norfolk, UK) at 650 nm light (Tsimili-Michael and Strasser, 2001) with an intensity of 2500 μmol m−2 s−1. Measurements on S. arctica were done in situ whereas leaves of V. uliginosum were excised and immediately brought to the laboratory to be measured. This procedure was tested, and the detachment did not affect the response.

Leaf gas exchange was measured with a CIRAS-1 connected to an automatic broad leaf cuvette (PLC(B)) (PP Systems, Hertfordshire, UK) and done at leaf temperature optimum (20°C) and saturating photon irradiance (1200 μmol m−2 s−1) at two CO2 levels: Ambient (364 ppm) and saturated (1800 ppm). In cases where the leaf did not fill out the cuvette of the PLC (B) (2.5 cm2), a digital picture was taken of the cuvette with the leaf inserted and data was recalculated with the actual area, obtained by image analysis.

Possible plot edge effects were taken into account by preferentially avoiding measurements on leaves near the edges of the plots. Diurnal variations of responses were also taken into account by measuring chlorophyll fluorescence within the same time interval each day (1300–1800 h). Gas exchange measurements, taking longer time, were done between 1100 and 2200 h. Data showed that the time of the day did not influence Pn (data not shown). Weekly, computer controlled CIRAS measurements were done to obtain Pn response curves of temperature, light, and CO2 on leaves of S. arctica plants growing outside the laboratory.

During two days in August, series of measurements were performed, where Fv/Fm and gas exchange were measured on the same S. arctica leaf consecutively in order to compare the two physiological parameters directly on leaf basis.

The following climatic parameters were measured continuously on both sites by means of two identical data loggers (CR 10X, Campbell Scientific, Ltd., Loughborough, UK). At each site close to the plots relative air humidity and air temperature were measured (Vaisala 50Y probe) and PAR was measured perpendicular to the slope (GaAsP photodiode [Pontailler, 1990]). In four plots at each site soil moisture in 0 to 30 cm depth were measured (CS615 Water Content Reflectometer, Campbell Scientific). In all plots air and soil temperature in 3 cm depth were measured with epoxy (air) or rubber (soil) coated thermocouples connected to an AM25T Solid State Multiplexer (Campbell Scientific). Surface volumetric soil moisture content in 0 to 6 cm depth was measured weekly in all plots (Theta-probe type ML2x, Delta-T Devices Ltd). UV-B data was obtained from the meteorological station (no. 641) about 1 km from the sites (Asiaq (Greenland Survey)), unpublished).

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Statistical analyses were conducted using the GLM procedure (SAS Institute, 2002). The effects of UV treatments, block and growing season (date) were tested with a three-way ANOVA. This was done for each species and each site. We used a four-way ANOVA to test the effects of species and sites, respectively. Each sampling day was also separately tested in a two-way ANOVA with treatment and block as factors. In cases of significant treatment effects these analyses were followed by tests of treatment differences using Tukey's test. In addition, a repeated measures approach was also carried out, with treatment and block as main factors and with day repeated within each plot. This was to take into account that the same experimental unit (the plot) was measured several times during the season. Data from Fv/Fm and Pn measurements on the same day were tested to examine the connection between the two physiological parameters done with a multiple regression.

Levene's test was used to test for homogeneity of variance. Where necessary parameters were transformed in order to meet the assumptions of ANOVA. All values presented here are non-transformed. Unless otherwise noted, differences are considered at the P < 0.05 level.

In the following, analyses are referred to as “effect of treatments” when the tests included all four treatments and “effect of UV reduction” when only the treatments with filters (UV-B, UV-B + A and filter control) were included in the tests.

Results

FILTER PROPERTIES

Laboratory spectrophotometer measurements of the transmittance of the films showed that the Teflon, Mylar, and Lexan transmittance of UV-A (315–400 nm) averaged 88.6, 77.6, and 29.3% and for UV-B (280–315 nm) averaged 83.4, 0.7, and 8.0%, respectively. The field measurements with the Scintec sensor showed that the plant canopy under Teflon, Mylar, and Lexan, respectively, were exposed to approx. 91, 39, and 17% of the clear sky UV-B irradiance, slightly depending on the exposure angle to the sun (Table 1). Some of the measured irradiation is supposed to be due to diffuse and reflected radiation reaching the UV-B sensor from the open sides not covered with filters.

MICROCLIMATE

Overlying large fluctuations, the overall irradiance and air and soil temperatures were declining during the experimental period (Fig. 1). The low PAR and temperatures 13–22 July were due to a very cloudy period. As can be seen on Figure 1a the PAR irradiance was highest on the site sloping most perpendicular to the midday solar irradiance (site 2). Midday refers to the time where the irradiance is highest which was around 1400 h (Fig. 1a). Correlations between radiation on the less sloping site 1 and on the nearby meteorological station were very good (all r > 0.94, P < 0.0001 for PAR, n = 479) for which reason the UV-B data is expected to be comparable to radiation at site 1.

Mean relative air humidity was 78% ± 0.5 (diurnal) and 67 % ± 0.9 (1300–1800 h) at Site 1. Soil moisture contents at both 0–6 and 0–30 cm depth were significantly lower at site 2 than at site 1 (mean values around 0.3 and 0.45 m−3 m−3, respectively). During the experimental period soil moisture hardly decreased and the soil moisture did not differ substantially between the treatments within the sites. No significant differences or tendencies in surface soil moisture content (0–6 cm depth) were seen during the season or between treatments within the sites.

CHLOROPHYLL FLUORESCENCE

At both sites and for both species there was an overall effect of treatment (all P < 0.0001) and of UV reduction on Fv/Fm (all P < 0.0001 at site 2. P = 0.0002 for S. arctica and P = 0.0023 for V. uliginosum at site 1). Table 2 shows the details. It can also be seen that the values of Fv/Fm in the filter control were somewhat higher than 0.7, thus indicating a generally low stress level in the leaves of the two species. The levels of Fv/Fm were similar at the two sites but, aided by the large number of samplings (n = 6896), the overall Fv/Fm proved to be significantly lower at site 2 than at site 1 (P < 0.001). At site 1, the overall Fv/Fm did not differ significantly between the two species, but at site 2, V. uliginosum had a significantly lower overall Fv/Fm than S. arctica (P < 0.001).

Figures 2 and 3 show the results of all measurements. For S. arctica the effects were pronounced in the middle of the sampling period with values of Fv/Fm being significantly higher after UV-B + A reduction at site 1 and after UV-B reduction at site 2. For V. uliginosum significantly positive effects of mainly UV-B+A reduction was seen on Fv/Fm in the end of the growing season at site 1 (higher values). This trend was not observed at site 2.

Mean values of Fv/Fm correlated negatively with PAR (1300–1800 h) at each site (r = −0.80, P < 0.0001, n = 20 and r = −0.74, P = 0.001, n = 16 at site 1 and 2, respectively) (Fig. 4). Tested on site 1 this correlation was even stronger in the first half of the sampling period (10–27 July) (r = −0.93, P = 0.0003, n = 9) but less at the end of the period (30 July–17August) (r = −0.72, P = 0.02, n = 10).

GAS EXCHANGE

Figure 5 shows the seasonal variation of net photosynthesis at saturating light intensity in S. arctica. Comparing the treatments, the overall mean values of Pn, measured as net CO2 uptake, did not show any significant influence of UV reduction (Table 3). Despite this, both UV reduction treatments resulted in significantly lower overall values of stomatal conductance (gs) and intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) (all P < 0.002). This was the case at both ambient and saturating CO2 level (Table 3). Apparently Ci did not show any particular seasonal variation whereas gs showed same seasonality as Pn.

From the simultaneous measurements on the same S. arctica leaves, a correlation between Pn and Fv/Fm (all treatments) was found when Pn was measured at ambient CO2 level (r = 0.35, P = 0.006) but not at saturating level (Fig. 6).

Discussion

CHLOROPHYLL FLUORESCENCE

This experiment showed significantly higher values of Fv/Fm at reduced UV levels. This is in contrast to other UV-B exclusion experiments on natural vegetation at high latitudes (Xiong and Day 2001; Lud et al., 2001) where no changes in maximal photochemical efficiency were observed. Levels of and differences in Fv/Fm represent not only plant stress caused by UV-B. The influence of PAR on Fv/Fm was so large that plant stress caused by PAR and interactions between PAR and UV-B were considerable. In agreement with Xiong and Day (2001) this could be due to PSII being more affected by the large changes in PAR than the relatively small changes in UV-B (energetically).

The fact that PSII is more stressed on days with high PAR (negative correlation) is likely to be due to an irradiance that has been higher than the light saturating level for the plants. There were no days in the season where mean PAR (1300–1800 h) were more than 900 μmol m−2 s−1 and light response curves showed that in general leaves of S. arctica were saturated at 1200 μmol m−2 s−1. However, it should be taken into account that the light response curves were measured at 20°C leaf temperature while the ambient leaf temperature probably has been lower. On days with high PAR it is thus likely that the plants have been stressed by PAR as well as by UV-B.

Correlations between PAR and Fv/Fm declined during the season. As mean temperatures also declined during the season this could partially explain the response, but the primary cause is likely that Fv/Fm became increasingly influenced by senescence. Senescence starts already at the beginning of August, past the middle of the experimental period. This is in agreement with seasonal Pn peaking already during the end of July (Fig. 5) and was also confirmed by observations on the leaves, where changes in color were detected only short time after the peak of Pn.

The Fv/Fm-effects on S. arctica are most prominent in the middle of the sampling period (beginning of August) (Figs. 2, 3). The reason for this is presumably a combined effect of first, that the plants had experienced some weeks with UV-B reduction, and second, that there was still a relatively high incoming solar radiation at that time. According to the different slopes of the two sites, the high dependence on the solar radiation also explains why the effects on Fv/Fm differ between the sites. The site with highest incoming solar radiation (site 2) showed effects of the lowest UV-B reduction (-UV-B) while significant effects at site 1 only was found with the highest UV-B reduction (-UV-AB). The latter treatment does not reveal significant higher values of Fv/Fm at site 2. This indicates some interactions with UV-A effects when solar radiation is high as at site 2 in the beginning of August. These interactions could both involve the need for UV-A to contribute to photoreactivation and protection by flavonoids (Turunen et al., 1999; Jenkins et al., 2001) but also negative effects of UV-A (Cooley et al., 2000).

The effects on V. uliginosum appear later in the sampling period than those of S. arctica (Fig. 2). This could be due accumulative effects, but Phoenix et al. (2001) found no effects on V. uliginosum of 5 yr UV-B treatment. Instead the later appearance of effects in V. uliginosum at site 1 probably should be linked with interactions between the effects of senescence and UV-B. Vaccinium uliginosum at site 2 did not show any marked effects of reduced UV-B, nor is seen as prominent day to day fluctuations than on V. uliginosum at site 1 and on S. arctica on both sites (Figs. 2, 3)—except for 10 July, where initial methodological difficulties with V. uliginosum at site 2 are supposed to have affected the results that day. Phoenix et al. (2001) concluded a general UV-B tolerance but also interaction between precipitation and UV-B effects in V. uliginosum. Our results from the drier site 2 could be attributed to this. It is likely that Fv/Fm has been governed by factors other than the solar radiation on V. uliginosum at site 2.

REDUCED gs AND Ci BUT NOT Pn

The significantly higher gs—but not Pn—in the filter control plots (near-ambient UV-B) could be due to direct effects of UV-B. Direct effects on stomates have been reported from UV-B supplemental experiments (Nogués et al., 1999; Cooley et al., 2000). In contrast to this study other experimenters have shown that supplemental UV-B resulted in reduced gs, but their results on Ci were inconsistent: Correia et al. (1999) also found an increased Ci while Nogués et al. (1999) found that the decrease in gs was not followed by a similar decrease in Ci. As more closed stomates make changes in Ci more dependent on internal CO2 exchanges among the mesophyll cells, we believe that the reduced Ci found in this study is more determined by effects on respiration and/or rates of carboxylation/oxygenation of RuBisCO rather than being a direct result of reduced gs. This is in accordance with the absence of effects on Pn, which, in case of Ci having been determined only by gs, would have been expected to have decreased too. If the lower gs in the plants treated with UV reduction has limited the gross CO2 uptake at ambient CO2 level, the unaffected Pn could be explained by a lower respiration. If the amount of damage caused by UV-B was lower in the plants treated with UV reduction, the respiration needed for repair and protection would also be lower. Since reduction of UV-B resulted in positive effects on Fv/Fm and since UV-B in general causes the D1 polypeptide in PSII to become more unstable (Mackerness et al., 1997; Mattoo et al., 1999) it is also likely that UV-B reduction resulted in a lower turnover rate of D1 and thus a lower maintenance respiration. The assumption of lowered respiration is in agreement with Gwynn-Jones (2001) who found leaf respiration to be higher with enhanced UV-B. UV-B effects on respiration are in general not well investigated (Rozema et al., 1997) and our experiment reveals a need for further research.

The effects of UV-B may seem of less importance in the perspective of short-time climate variability or global change (e.g., Björn et al., 1999). Our results are in agreement with this. However, the impact of ambient UV-B may have been larger than we detected, at least for some of the leaves. In our experiment block effects and especially different angles of the leaves to the solar irradiance have caused large variation in data. This, together with the fact that accumulating effects of ambient UV-B have been found in Antarctic (Day et al., 2001; Robson et al., 2003) and that a continuous increase of the ambient UV-B level is presumed (Taalas et al., 2000), suggests that further investigations of the effects of ambient UV-B radiation on vegetation at high latitudes is necessary.

Conclusion

The net depletion of the stratospheric ozone layer has increased the UV-B radiation in the High Arctic in such an order that a reduction of the UV-B irradiance on S. arctica and V. uliginosum resulted in frequent increases in Fv/Fm and reductions of gs and Ci without affecting Pn. It cannot be excluded, that the observed short-term effects could result in long-term negative effects on growth and survival for the investigated species.

Acknowledgments

The work was financial supported by DANCEA (Danish Co-operation for Environment in the Arctic). Thanks to the logistic staff from the Danish Polar Center for making the experiments in Zackenberg possible. Thanks to Carsten Dam Hansen and Steen Grüner Hanson from Optics and Plasma Research Department, Risoe National Laboratory for spectroscopic analysis of the filters.

References Cited

1.

L. O. Björn 2002. Effects of ultraviolet-B radiation on terrestrial organisms and ecosystems with special reference to the Arctic. In Hessen, D. O., (ed.), UV Radiation and Arctic Ecosystems. Ecological Studies 153. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer, 93–121. Google Scholar

2.

L. O. Bjorn, T. V. Callaghan, C. Gehrke, D. Gwynn-Jones, J. A. Lee, U. Johanson, M. Sonesson, and N. D. Buck . 1999. Effects of ozone depletion and increased ultraviolet-B radiation on northern vegetation. Polar Research 18:331–337. Google Scholar

3.

L. C. Bliss 1997. Arctic ecosystems of North America. In Wielgolaski, F. E. (ed.), Polar and Alpine Tundra. Ecosystems of the World, 3. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 551–684. Google Scholar

4.

T. V. Callaghan and S. Jonasson . 1995. Arctic terrestrial ecosystems and environmental change. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A 352:259–276. Google Scholar

5.

CIE, 1999. 134/1:TC 6-26 report: Standardization of the terms UV-A1, UV-A2 and UV-B. CIE Collection in Photobiology and Photochemistry, CIE 134-1999 ISBN 3 900 734 94 1. Google Scholar

6.

N. M. Cooley, M. G. Holmes, and T. H. Attridge . 2000. Growth and stomatal responses of temperate meadow species to enhanced levels of UV-A and UV-B + A radiation in the natural environment. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology 57:179–185. Google Scholar

7.

C. M. Correia, E. L V. Areal, M. S. Torres-Pereira, and J. M G. Torres-Pereira . 1999. Intraspecific variation in sensitivity to ultraviolet-B radiation in maize grown under field conditions. II. Physiological and biochemical aspects. Field Crops Research 62:97–105. Google Scholar

8.

A. Dahlback 2002. Recent changes in surface ultraviolet solar radiation and stratospheric ozone at a high arctic site. In Hessen, D. O. (ed.), UV Radiation and Arctic Ecosystems. Ecological Studies, 153. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer, 1–20. Google Scholar

9.

T. A. Day, C. T. Ruhland, and F. S. Xiong . 2001. Influence of solar ultraviolet-B radiation on Antarctic terrestrial plants: Results from a 4-year field study. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B Biology 62:1–278–87. Google Scholar

10.

DPC, 2003. Zackenberg Ecological Research Operations. 8th Annual Report 2002. Danish Polar Center. Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (URL:  www.zackenberg.dk). Google Scholar

11.

D. Gwynn-Jones 2001. Short-term impacts of enhanced UV-B radiation on photo assimilate allocation and metabolism: a possible interpretation for time-dependent inhibition of growth. Plant Ecology 154:67–73. Google Scholar

12.

J. R. Herman, P. K. Bhartia, J. Ziemke, Z. Ahmad, and D. Larko . 1996. UV-B increases (1972–1992) from decreases in total ozone. Geophysical Research Letters 23:162117–2120. Google Scholar

13.

G. I. Jenkins, J. C. Long, H. K. Wade, M. R. Shenton, and T. N. Bibikova . 2001. UV and blue light signalling: pathways regulating chalcone synthase gene expression in Arabidopsis. New Phytologist 151:121–131. Google Scholar

14.

S. Li, M. Paulsson, and L. O. Björn . 2002. Temperature-dependent formation and photo repair of DNA damage induced by UV-B radiation in suspension-cultured tobacco cells. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology 66:67–72. Google Scholar

15.

D. Lud, A. H L. Huiskes, T. C W. Moerdijk, and J. Rozema . 2001. The effects of altered levels of UV-B radiation on an Antarctic grass and lichen. Plant Ecology 154:89–99. Google Scholar

16.

S. A-H. Mackerness, B. R. Jordan, and B. Thomas . 1997. UV-B effects on the expression of genes encoding proteins involved in photosynthesis. In Lumsden P. J. (ed.), Plants and UV-B: Responses to Environmental Change. Society for Experimental Biology Seminar Series 64. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 113–134. Google Scholar

17.

A. K. Mattoo, M. T. Giardi, A. Raskind, and M. Edelman . 1999. Dynamic metabolism of photosystem II reaction center proteins and pigments. Physiologia Plantarum 107:4454–461. Google Scholar

18.

S. Nogués, D. J. Allen, J. I L. Morison, and R. N. Baker . 1999. Characterization of stomatal closure caused by ultraviolet-B radiation. Plant Physiology 121:2489–496. Google Scholar

19.

N. Paul 2001. Plant responses to UV-B: time to look beyond stratospheric ozone depletion?. New Phytologist 150:1–8. Google Scholar

20.

G. K. Phoenix, D. Gwynn-Jones, T. V. Callaghan, D. Sleep, and J. A. Lee . 2001. Effects of global change on a sub-Arctic heath: effects of enhanced UV-B radiation and increased summer precipitation. Journal of Ecology 89:256–267. Google Scholar

21.

J. Y. Pontailler 1990. A cheap quantum sensor using a gallium arsenide photodiode. Functional Ecology 4:591–596. Google Scholar

22.

J. A. Pyle 1997. Global ozone depletion: observations and theory. In Lumsden P. J. (ed.), Plants and UV-B: Responses to Environmental Change. Society for Experimental Biology Seminar Series 64. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–11. Google Scholar

23.

T. M. Robson, V. A. Pancotto, S. D. Flint, C. L. Ballare, O. E. Sala, A. L. Scopel, and M. M. Caldwell . 2003. Six years of solar UV-B manipulations affect growth of Sphagnum and vascular plants in a Tierra del Fuego peatland. New Phytologist 160:379–389. Google Scholar

24.

M. C. Rousseaux, A. L. Scopel, P. S. Searles, M. M. Caldwell, E. S. Osvaldo, and C. L. Ballaré . 2001. Responses to solar ultraviolet-B radiation in a shrub dominated natural ecosystem of Tierra del Fuego (Southern Argentina). Global Change Biology 7:467–478. Google Scholar

25.

J. Rozema, J. Staaij, L. O. Björn, and M. Caldwell . 1997. UV-B as an environmental factor in plant life: stress and regulation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 12:22–28. Google Scholar

26.

SAS Institute, 2002. SAS/STAT Users Guide, release 8.2. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA. Google Scholar

27.

P. S. Searles, S. D. Flint, and M. M. Caldwell . 2001. A meta-analysis of plant field studies simulating stratospheric ozone depletion. Oecologia 127:1–10. Google Scholar

28.

J. H. Sullivan and J. Rozema . 1999. UV-B effects on terrestrial plant growth and photosynthesis. In Rozema J. (ed.), Stratospheric Ozone Depletion: The Effects of Enhanced UV-B Radiation on Terrestrial Ecosystems. Leiden, Holland: Backhuys Publishers, 39–57. Google Scholar

29.

P. Taalas, J. Kaurola, A. Kylling, D. Shindell, R. Sausen, M. Dameris, V. Grewe, J. Herman, J. Damski, and B. Steil . 2000. The impact of greenhouse gases and halogenated species on future solar UV radiation doses. Geophysical Research Letters 27:1127–1130. Google Scholar

30.

M. Tsimilli-Michael and R. J. Strasser . 2001. Fingerprints of climate changes on the photosynthetic apparatus' behaviour, monitored by the JIP-test. In Walther, G.-R., Burga, C. A., Edwards, P. J. (eds.), “Fingerprints” of Climate Changes—Adapted Behaviour and Shifting Species Ranges. New York and London: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 229–247. Google Scholar

31.

M. Turunen, W. Heller, S. Stich, H. Sandermann, M-L. Sutinen, and Y. Norokorpi . 1999. The effects of UV exclusion on the soluble phenolics of young Scots pine seedlings in the subarctic. Environmental Pollution 106:219–228. Google Scholar

32.

F. S. Xiong and T. A. Day . 2001. Effect of solar ultraviolet-B radiation during springtime ozone depletion on photosynthesis and biomass production of antarctic vascular plants. Plant Physiology 125:738–751. Google Scholar

Appendices

FIGURE 1.

Seasonal fluctuations of PAR and temperature at site 1, UV-B from the climate station and diurnal fluctuations of PAR at site 1 and 2. (a) Mean diurnal PAR and UV-B ± 1 SE. (b) Daily accumulated PAR ± 1 SE and UV-B throughout the experimental period. (c) Mean diurnal temperatures of soil (black) and air (white). For both: ○ = control. ▿ = filter control. □ = -UV-B. ⋄ = -UV-AB. (d) Mean daily temperatures throughout the measurement period. Signatures as in (c). (a) and (c) cover the period 10 July to 8 August. (b) and (d) are 24-h means

i1523-0430-36-3-364-f01.gif

FIGURE 2.

Mean Fv/Fm per treatment per sampling day and mean PAR at site 1 showing when significant differences between the filter treatments were found (2-factor ANOVA, filter treatments only). Days with significance are marked with * when P < 0.05; ** when P < 0.01, or *** when P < 0.001

i1523-0430-36-3-364-f02.gif

FIGURE 3.

Mean Fv/Fm per treatment per sampling day and mean PAR at site 2. See Figure 2 legend. PAR data on 11, 14, and 17 July are omitted because of errors in noon PAR data

i1523-0430-36-3-364-f03.gif

FIGURE 4.

Correlation between accumulated (1300–1800 h.) daily PAR and mean daily Fv/Fm (filter treatments). Site 1: r = −0.80 (n = 20; days where either one or both of the species were measured on). Site 2: r = −0.74 (n = 16)

i1523-0430-36-3-364-f04.gif

FIGURE 5.

Net photosynthesis (Pn) at 1200 μmol photons m−2 s−1, 360 ppm CO2, and 20°C throughout the season. Data are mean ± 1 SE

i1523-0430-36-3-364-f05.gif

FIGURE 6.

Fv/Fm and net photosynthesis (Pn) at ambient CO2 level. r = 0.35 (P = 0.0006) for all treatments together. Each dot corresponds to one measurement (n = 59). Omission of the Fv/Fm < 0.65 does not change neither slope nor y axis intersection of the regression line

i1523-0430-36-3-364-f06.gif

TABLE 1

Percentages of ambient UV-B and PAR that reached the plant canopy under the frames with Mylar, Teflon, and Lexan filters using a UV-B sensor (Scintec) and PAR sensor (LiCor). Measurements at a 45° angle to the sun correspond to measurements on a horizontal surface as the mean solar elevation is approximately 45° over the horizon

i1523-0430-36-3-364-t01.gif

TABLE 2

Mean Fv/Fm in the period 8 July–17 August. Letters are to be read per site per species. If different, the means are statistically different, P < 0.05

i1523-0430-36-3-364-t02.gif

TABLE 3

Mean ± 1 SE of net photosynthesis (Pn), stomatal conductance (gs) and inter-cellular CO2 (Ci) per treatment at site 1, S. arctica in the period 20 July–17 August. P refers to ANOVA for all four treatments. P, filter treatment refers to ANOVA within the three filter treatments. Different letters show significant differences at α = 0.05 (Tukey, all treatments). Letters are to be read per dependent variable per CO2 level

i1523-0430-36-3-364-t03.gif
Linda Bredahl, Helge Ro-Poulsen, and Teis N. Mikkelsen "Reduction of the Ambient UV-B Radiation in the High-Arctic Increases Fv/Fm in Salix arctica and Vaccinium uliginosum and Reduces Stomatal Conductance and Internal CO2 Concentration in Salix arctica," Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research 36(3), 364-369, (1 August 2004). https://doi.org/10.1657/1523-0430(2004)036[0364:ROTAUR]2.0.CO;2
Published: 1 August 2004
JOURNAL ARTICLE
6 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top