Translator Disclaimer
13 November 2015 Why we should retain Nothofagus sensu lato
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
We present the case that the fossil record of Nothofagaceae, which is much more extensive in terms of species numbers than the living species, cannot be dealt with in a productive way by the recent proposal by Heenan and Smissen to split Nothofagus into four genera (Phytotaxa, vol. 146, http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.146.1.1). Such a proposal will render the fossil record almost unworkable, and will lead to a major split in the approach taken by palynologists in comparison to other researchers. We believe the case for the new generic names, while valid, is weak, and is far outweighed by the utility of retaining Nothofagus sensu lato.
© CSIRO 2015
Robert S. Hill, Gregory J. Jordan and Michael K. Macphail "Why we should retain Nothofagus sensu lato," Australian Systematic Botany 28(2–3), (13 November 2015). https://doi.org/10.1071/SB15026
Received: 10 June 2015; Accepted: 20 August 2015; Published: 13 November 2015
JOURNAL ARTICLE
4 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top