Translator Disclaimer
1 March 2001 Corticosteroid-Binding Globulin Status at the Fetomaternal Interface During Human Term Pregnancy
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The status of the corticosteroid-binding globulin (CBG) at the fetomaternal interface, especially in the maternal intervillous blood space (I), was investigated and compared to that of CBG in the maternal (M) and fetal (umbilical arteries [A] and vein [V]) peripheral circulations at term. Immunoquantitation of plasma CBG showed that the CBG concentration in I was 30% less than that in M (P < 0.001) and threefold higher than that in umbilical cord blood (P < 0.001). The microheterogeneity of CBG studied by immunoaffinoelectrophoresis in the presence of concanavalin A and Western blotting indicated that the CBG in I was mainly of maternal origin and different from fetal CBG. A CBG mRNA, but no classic 50- to 59-kDa CBG, was found in isolated term trophoblastic cells. The steroid environment of the CBG in I differed greatly from that in the peripheral maternal and fetal circulations, because the progesterone:cortisol molar ratio in I was 75-fold higher than that in M and 7- to 10-fold higher than that in the fetal circulation. Binding studies revealed that the affinity constants of CBG for cortisol in I, A, and V were significantly lower than that in M plasma (P < 0.02) in their respective hormonal contexts. The binding parameters for I-CBG stripped of endogenous steroids and lipids were close to those for M-CBG but different from those of fetal CBG (P < 0.001). These data reflect the physiological relevance of the CBG-steroid interaction, especially with very CBG-loaded progesterone at the fetomaternal interface during late pregnancy.

Claudine Benassayag, Isabelle Souski, Thérèse-Marie Mignot, Brigitte Robert, Jacqueline Hassid, Paulette Duc-Goiran, Françoise Mondon, Régis Rebourcet, Louis Dehennin, Emmanuel-Adrien Nunez, and Françoise Ferré "Corticosteroid-Binding Globulin Status at the Fetomaternal Interface During Human Term Pregnancy," Biology of Reproduction 64(3), 812-821, (1 March 2001). https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod64.3.812
Received: 10 July 2000; Accepted: 1 October 2000; Published: 1 March 2001
JOURNAL ARTICLE
10 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top