Translator Disclaimer
1 June 2007 Allocation of Gamma-Tubulin Between Oocyte Cortex and Meiotic Spindle Influences Asymmetric Cytokinesis in the Mouse Oocyte
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

In oocytes, asymmetric cytokinesis represents a conserved strategy for karyokinesis during meiosis to retain ooplasmic maternal factors needed after fertilization. Given the role of gamma-tubulin in cell cycle progression and microtubule dynamics, this study focused on gamma-tubulin as a key regulator of asymmetric cytokinesis in mouse oocytes. Gamma-tubulin properties were studied using multiple-label digital imaging, Western blots, quantitative RT-PCR, and microinjection strategies in mouse oocytes matured in vivo (IVO) or in vitro (IVM). Quantitative image analysis established that IVO oocytes extrude smaller first polar bodies (PBs), contain smaller spindles, and have more cytoplasmic microtubule organizing centers (MTOCs) relative to IVM oocytes. Maturation in culture was shown to alter gamma-tubulin distribution, as evidenced by incorporation throughout the meiotic spindle and within the first PB. Western blot analysis confirmed that total gamma-tubulin content remained elevated in IVM oocytes compared with IVO oocytes. Analysis of gamma-tubulin mRNA during maturation revealed fluctuations in IVO oocytes, whereas IVM oocytes maintained relatively stable at lower levels for the time points examined (0–16 h). Selective reduction of gamma-tubulin mRNA by injection of siRNA diminished both spindle and PB size, whereas overexpression of enhanced green fluorescent protein gamma-tubulin had the opposite effect. Together, these studies reinforce the notion that limiting gamma-tubulin availability during meiotic maturation ensures coordination of karyokinesis and cytokinesis and conservation of gamma-tubulin as an embryonic reserve.

Susan L. Barrett and David F. Albertini "Allocation of Gamma-Tubulin Between Oocyte Cortex and Meiotic Spindle Influences Asymmetric Cytokinesis in the Mouse Oocyte," Biology of Reproduction 76(6), 949-957, (1 June 2007). https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.106.057141
Received: 5 September 2006; Accepted: 1 February 2007; Published: 1 June 2007
JOURNAL ARTICLE
9 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top