Translator Disclaimer
12 October 2011 Diploid Clone Produces Unreduced Diploid Gametes but Tetraploid Clone Generates Reduced Diploid Gametes in the Misgurnus Loach
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Most individuals of the loach Misgurnus anguillicaudatus reproduce bisexually, but cryptic clonal lineages reproduce by natural gynogenesis of unreduced diploid eggs that are genetically identical to maternal somatic cells. Triploid progeny often occur by the accidental incorporation of a sperm nucleus into diploid eggs. Sex reversal from a genetic female to a physiological male is easily induced in this species by androgen treatment and through environmental influences. Here, we produced clonal tetraploid individuals by two methods: 1) fertilization of diploid eggs from a clonal diploid female with diploid sperm of a hormonally sex-reversed clonal diploid male and 2) artificial inhibition of the release of the second polar body in eggs of clonal diploid females just after initiation of gynogenetic development. There is no genetic difference between the clonal diploid and tetraploid individuals except for the number of chromosome sets or genomes. Clonal tetraploid males never produced unreduced tetraploid sperm, only diploid sperm that were genetically identical to those of a clonal diploid. Likewise, clonal tetraploid females did not form unreduced tetraploid eggs, just diploid eggs. However, the eggs' genotypes were identical to those of the original clone, and almost all the eggs initiated natural gynogenesis. Thus, gametogenesis of the clonal tetraploid loach is controlled by the presence of two chromosome sets to pair, thereby preserving the normal meiotic process, i.e., the formation of bivalents and subsequently two successive divisions.

© 2012 by the Society for the Study of Reproduction, Inc.
Kagayaki Morishima, Hiroyuki Yoshikawa, and Katsutoshi Arai "Diploid Clone Produces Unreduced Diploid Gametes but Tetraploid Clone Generates Reduced Diploid Gametes in the Misgurnus Loach," Biology of Reproduction 86(2), (12 October 2011). https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.111.093302
Received: 12 May 2011; Accepted: 1 October 2011; Published: 12 October 2011
JOURNAL ARTICLE
PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top