Inflammation of the cervicovaginal mucosa is considered a risk factor for HIV infection in heterosexual transmission. In this context, seminal plasma (SP) may play an important role that is not limited to being the main carrier for the virions. It is known that SP induces an inflammatory reaction in the cervix called postcoital leukocytic reaction, which has been associated with promotion of fertility. The mechanisms by which SP triggers this reaction, however, have not been clearly established. Previously we reported the expression of prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 (PTGS2), also known as cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2), in human vaginal cells in response to toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands and other proinflammatory stimuli. In this study, we demonstrate that SP induces transcriptional and translational increase of COX-2 expression in human vaginal cells and cervicovaginal tissue explants. Furthermore, SP potentiates vaginal PTGS2 expression induced by other proinflammatory stimulants, such as TLR ligands and a vaginal mucosal irritant (nonoxynol-9) in a synergistic manner. SP-induced PTGS2 expression is mediated by intracellular signaling pathways involving MAPKs and NF-κB. Using fractionation and functional analysis, seminal prostaglandin (PG)-E2 was identified as a one of the major factors in PTGS2 induction. Given the critical role of this PG-producing enzyme in mucosal inflammatory processes, the finding that SP induces and potentiates the expression of PTGS2 in cervicovaginal cells and tissues has mechanistic implications for the role of SP in fertility-associated mucosal leukocytic reaction and its potential HIV infection-enhancing effect.
INTRODUCTION
Mucosal inflammation of the female lower genital tract is regarded as an important factor favoring acquisition of HIV-1 infection via vaginal intercourse [1–3]. The sites of inflammation are enriched with HIV target immune cells and may have breaches in the mucosal epithelial barrier, both of which facilitate HIV acquisition [4]. Seminal plasma (SP) is the main vector for HIV in sexual transmission, but SP is not only a carrier for HIV [5, 6]. In vitro studies have shown that SP may both inhibit and facilitate HIV infection. Inhibitory effects of SP include antiviral activity of the semen cationic polypeptides, suppression of HIV binding to a subset of dendritic cells, protection of HIV-target cells by semenogelin, inactivation of HIV by SP-reactive oxygen species, and SP-induced increase in transepithelial resistance [7–12]. In contrast, SP may facilitate HIV infection in several ways. Semen-derived enhancer of viral infection (SEVI) amyloid fibrils have been shown to promote virions' attachment to target cells [13]. In cervicovaginal mucosa, SP induces upregulation of CCL20, a chemokine involved in attracting Langerhans cells to the epithelium, a phenomenon associated with HIV transmission [14]. Neutralization of the vaginal acidic pH, deleterious to virion survival, is an additional factor that increases the chances of HIV infection [15].
From in vivo studies, it is also known that semen causes the so-called postcoital inflammatory response, or leukocytic reaction [16, 17]. Presence of seminal plasma in the mammalian reproductive tract results in an immediate and dramatic influx of immune cells to the cervix and an increase in the level of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines [18]. These changes are believed to play a role in facilitating conception [18, 19]. In immortalized cervical cells, SP has been reported to stimulate proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-8, IL-6, CSF2, CCL2, GM-CSF, and CCL20 [14, 20, 21].
SP has also been shown to induce prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 (PTGS2), also known as cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2), in cervical adenocarcinoma cells in vitro and ectocervical cells in vitro and in vivo [16, 20, 21]. PTGS2 codes for an enzyme that is ubiquitously expressed in inflammatory settings [22]. It catalyzes the rate-limiting step in the synthesis of prostaglandins. A major PTGS2 product, prostaglandin (PG) E2, is essential in inflammation-related tissue changes [23]. It induces vasodilation and increases vascular permeability, resulting in massive influx of immune cells, including HIV target cells, to the sites of inflammation. Elevated levels of PGE2 result in chemoattraction and activation of immune cells and are associated with visible signs of acute inflammation [24]. Previously, we identified PTGS2 as a biomarker for vaginal inflammation. We have reported the induction of vaginal PTGS2 in response to diverse proinflammatory stimulants, such as TNF-α, microbial ligands, and cell membrane-damaging surfactants [25]. In this study, we demonstrate that SP causes PTGS2 upregulation in human vaginal cells, confirming the inflammatory potential of SP and suggesting a possible role in HIV-1 transmission. We also identify PGE2, abundantly present in SP, as one of the major factors responsible for PTGS2 induction in vaginal cells.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Materials
Microbial ligands, Pam3CSK4 (Pam) and Lipoteichoic acid (LTA), and the immunomodulatory compound imiquimod (IMQ) were purchased from Invivogen (San Diego, CA). Nonoxynol-9 (N-9) was a kind gift from OrthoMcNeil Corporation (Raritan, NJ). 16,16-dimethyl (dm) PGE2 and PGE2 receptor antagonist AH-6809 were purchased from Cayman chemical (Ann Arbor, MI). Signal transduction inhibitors Bay11-7082, SB 202190, and U0126 were purchased from Calbiochem (Billerica, MA). Amicon Centrifugal Filter Devices with cutoffs of 100, 50, and 30 kD were purchased from Millipore Corporation (Billerica, MA). The primary antibodies used in Western blots were anti-COX-2 (PTGS2; Abcam Inc., Cambridge, MA), anti-beta actin (ACTB; BD Transduction Labs, Chicago, IL), anti-phos p38MAPK (Biosource, Grand Island, NY), anti-phos ERK1/2, anti-p38MAPK and anti-ERK 1/2 (Cell Signaling Technology, Boston, MA), anti-IkB-α and anti-NF-kB/p65 (RE-LA; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA).
Semen Collection and Preparation
Human semen was obtained from healthy, normozoospermic men enrolled in an Eastern Virginia Medical School Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved semen donation program. Semen was left at room temperature for about 1 h to allow liquefaction to occur. The samples were then centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 20 min at room temperature. Samples were either used the same day or aliquoted and stored at −80°C. In some experiments, several samples were pooled. Some samples were purchased from Lee Biosolutions (St. Louis, MO).
Seminal Plasma Fractionation and Heat Treatment
To test for the heat lability of PTGS2-stimulating factor(s), SP was incubated at 95°C for 10 min. Molecular-weight fractionation of SP was done by sequential filtration of SP diluted in growth medium with Amicon Centrifugal Filter Devices with cutoffs of 100, 50, and 30 kD. All the retained and flow-through fractions were stored at −80°C until used.
Cell Culture
The vaginal epithelial cell line VK-2/E6E7 was a gift from Dr. Raina Fichorova (Brigham and Women's Hospital, MA). This cell line was derived from epithelial cells of vaginal mucosal tissue from a 32-yr-old premenopausal woman undergoing anterior-posterior repair and was demonstrated to have structural and functional properties similar to those of their parental primary cells [26]. VK-2 cells were cultured to ∼80% confluency in 100- or 35-mm plates using keratinocyte serum-free medium (Gibco, Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY) supplemented with bovine pituitary extract (50 μg/ml) and epidermal growth factor at 0.1 ng/ml, penicillin-streptomycin (1%) and CaCl2 (0.4 mM). Medium was replenished every other day.
Cytotoxicity
Cells were grown in 96-well plates and incubated for 24 h with all the test compounds. Viability was estimated using CellTiter 96 AQueous One solution Cell Proliferation assay (Promega, Madison, WI).
Electrophoresis and Immunoblotting
Cells were washed three times with cold PBS and lysed with Laemmli loading buffer followed by boiling for 10 min to obtain total cellular protein. Nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions were isolated as described elsewhere [27] with minor modifications. Briefly, the cells were rinsed with ice-cold PBS and scraped with buffer containing 0.25 M sucrose, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 3 mM CaCl2, and 0.5% Triton X-100. The samples were centrifuged at 1000 × g for 5 min. The supernatant and the pellet were the cytoplasmic and nuclear fraction respectively.
These fractions were lysed using Laemmli loading buffer as mentioned above. Nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions were resolved by 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred onto PVDF membrane (Immobilon-P; Millipore). Nonspecific binding was blocked for 1 h in PBS containing 0.1% Tween-20 and 5% nonfat dry milk for 1 h. The membrane was incubated overnight at 4°C with specific primary antibodies. After incubation, the membrane was washed and incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit or anti-mouse secondary antibody (Invitrogen). Immunodetection was performed using enhanced chemiluminiscent Western blotting detection reagents (Amersham, GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ). To monitor protein loading for immunoblotting, the membrane was stripped, and ACTB, or total p38MAPK or ERK 1/2, was detected. Immunoblots were visualized using FluorChem Q Imaging System (Alpha Innotech, San Leandro, CA). Quantification of the blots was done using Image J (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). Intensity of PTGS2 bands was quantified in arbitrary units by normalizing to ACTB.
RNA Extraction and Quantitative RT-PCR
Total RNA was isolated from cultured cells using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) followed by purification using RNeasy columns (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer's recommendations.
For quantitative PCR analysis, RNA (1 μg) was converted to cDNA using a combination of random primers (reverse transcription system; Promega). PCR amplification was performed using the LightCycler FastStart DNA Master SYBR Green I (Roche, Indianapolis, IN) kit, according to the manufacturer's recommendations. GAPDH was used as the internal standard for PCR. The specific primers used were as follows:
GAPDH:
Forward 5′-GAGTCAACGGATTTGGTCGT-3′ and
Reverse 5′-GATCTCGCTCCTGGAAGATG-3′.
The thermocycler parameters were 95°C for 10 min, followed by 45 cycles of 95°C for 10 sec and 55°C for 5 sec and 72°C for 15 sec. Expression of PTGS2 mRNA was normalized using GAPDH. Relative gene expression was calculated by dividing the normalized expression in SP-treated cells by that of cells with growth medium only.
Quantitation of PGE2
SP PGE2 quantitation was done by multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) and liquid chromatography method using an ACQUITY UPLC system (Waters Corp., Milford, MA) at the Proteomics and Metabolomics Shared Resource, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center of Georgetown University. (See description of procedure in Supplemental Materials and Methods, available online at www.biolreprod.org.)
Each SP sample was prepared in triplicates, and three injections of each preparation were performed to assess reproducibility. The mass spectrometry data from the UPLC-TOFMS were processed using the TargetLynx (Waters Corp.).
Ectocervical and Vaginal Tissue Culture and Sample Processing
Ectocervical and vaginal tissues were obtained from premenopausal women (36 and 44 yr old, respectively) undergoing surgery because of benign gynecological conditions (fibroids and rectocele/cystocele). Proper consent was obtained according to an Eastern Virginia Medical School IRB-approved protocol. The mucosal and submucosal layers were dissected from the musculature. The tissues were cut into pieces 5 mm in diameter with 2–4 mm in thickness. They were acclimated at 37°C with 5% CO2 on cell culture inserts in RPMI 1640 (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% FBS and penicillin-streptomycin (1%). Subsequently, the tissues were subjected to different treatments. For immunoblotting, proteins were solubilized by homogenization of tissues in Laemmli loading buffer.
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining was performed with paraffin-embedded tissues fixed in 4% buffered formalin (Fisher Scientific, Hanover Park, IL). Briefly, the slides were deparaffinized, dehydrated, and rehydrated as per standard procedures. This was followed by antigen retrieval in citrate buffer (pH 6.2) at high temperature. Thereafter, the slides were cooled and washed with PBS. This was followed by incubation with anti-COX-2 (PTGS2) primary antibody (Abcam) at 1:500 dilution. Nonspecific binding was blocked by 1.5% goat serum. The slides were washed and incubated with goat anti-rabbit biotinylated secondary antibody followed by ABC reagent (Vectastain Labs, Burlingame, CA). The antigen was localized by incubation with AEC chromogen (ScyTek Labs, Logan, UT).
Data Analysis and Statistics
Statistical analysis and graphic presentation (Student t-test, Pearson correlation) were done using GraphPad Prism software version 5.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA). P-values less than 0.05 were regarded statistically significant. Statistical significance is indicated in the legends to figures. Quantification of immunoblots was done using Image J software (National Institutes of Health). Densitometric readings of PTGS2 signals on immunoblots were normalized to ACTB used as loading control and expressed in arbitrary units.
RESULTS
Effects of SP on Viability of Vaginal Cells
Human vaginal (VK-2/E6E7) cells were incubated with SP at different concentrations ranging from 0.1% to 30%. Viability was evaluated 24 h postincubation. A noticeable decrease in cell viability (down to 83% of medium control) was observed at a SP concentration of 20%, followed by a further drop in viability (to 65% of control) at a SP concentration of 30% (Fig. 1). Therefore, only SP concentrations ≤10% were used in the following experiments.
SP Induces a Dose-Dependent Increase in PTGS2 Expression in Human Vaginal Cells
Changes in PTGS2 mRNA and protein levels in vaginal cells in response to SP were assayed by quantitative RT-PCR and immunoblotting. Expression of PTGS2 followed a dose-dependent relationship with SP. The quantitative RT-PCR analysis revealed that PTGS2 mRNA expression increased 9-fold after treating the cells with 5% SP and 16-fold after treatment with 10% SP, compared to control (Fig. 2A). PTGS2 mRNA induction was corroborated by a similar dose-dependent increase in PTGS2 protein expression, as observed by immunoblotting (Fig. 2B).
SP Activates NF-kB and MAPK Pathways That Participate in PTGS2 Expression in Vaginal Cells
Depending on cell type and stimulus, different intracellular signaling pathways are shown to be involved in inflammation and PTGS2 expression. Nuclear factor kB (NF-kB) pathway is considered of central importance in inflammation and PTGS2 induction [28]. Activation of NF-kB in VK-2 cells stimulated with SP was demonstrated by rapid (within 30 min) degradation of NF-kB inhibitor IkB-α in cytoplasm accompanied by release and nuclear translocation of REL A (also known as NF-kB/p65; Fig. 3A). In addition, activation of mitogen-activated kinases (MAPK) p38 and ERK 1/2 was demonstrated by their phosphorylation, which occurred in VK-2 cells within 15 min of being incubated with SP (Fig. 3A). To confirm the involvement of these pathways in PTGS2 expression, VK-2 cells were treated with the pathway-specific inhibitors Bay11-7082 (NF-kB pathway), SB202190 (p38MAPK), and U0126 (ERK 1/2). Presence of each of the inhibitors abolished expression of PTGS2 (Fig. 3B), confirming the pathway involvement in SP induced PTGS2 expression by vaginal cells.
SP Potentiates PTGS2 Expression Caused by TLR Ligands and N-9
We previously demonstrated that TLR ligands Pam, LTA, and IMQ and the proinflammatory surfactant N-9 induce PTGS2 expression in VK-2 cells [25, 29]. In this study, we evaluated the effect of SP on PTGS2 expression in the presence of these compounds. Suboptimal concentrations of the compounds and SP dilutions were selected so that individual treatments of cells would result in low to negligible expression of PTGS2. However, when the compounds and SP were combined at these concentrations, PTGS2 protein expression was much higher than a mere sum of the PTGS2 induced by either of the treatments (Fig. 4). The observed synergistic effect of SP and TLR ligands implies that exposure to SP could potentiate inflammatory responses of the female vaginal epithelium to microbial antigens.
SP from Different Individuals Shows Variability in Its Capacity to Induce PTGS2 Expression
To evaluate interindividual variability in SP capacity to induce PTGS2, VK-2 cells were treated with SP from 12 different donors. Figure 5 shows a considerable interindividual variation in PTGS2 mRNA induction as demonstrated by quantitative RT-PCR. A mean of 24-fold increase in PTGS2 expression was observed across the group with donor-to-donor variation ranging from 7.4- to 41.6-fold compared to control (Fig. 5). Variations (although not as high in magnitude) in the PTGS2 stimulatory effect were also observed between semen samples from the same donor obtained on different days (data not shown).
PGE2 Is a Major Factor in SP-Mediated Stimulation of PTGS2
In an initial step to characterize the factor(s) responsible for PTGS2 induction, SP was heated for 10 min at 95°C. Figure 6A demonstrates that heat treatment drastically decreased the capacity of SP to induce PTGS2 in VK-2 cells, suggesting that the SP factor(s) responsible for increasing PTGS2 production was heat labile.
Next, SP was fractionated on the basis of the the molecular weights of its constituents using Amicon Centrifugal Filters with cutoffs of 100, 50, and 30. VK-2 cells were then treated with filter-retained and flow-through fractions. Fractions that passed through the filters with a cutoff of 30 kDa remained active in PTGS2 induction. In contrast, the retained fractions did not cause PTGS2 expression. Notably, although flow-through lower-molecular-weight fractions were free from higher-molecular-weight proteins, the separation was not complete for the retained fractions. Small proteins, similar to those contained in the flow-through fractions, were still present in the retained fractions (observed by gel electrophoresis), while PTGS2-stimulating activity was lost in them, suggesting that PTGS2 was induced by small nonprotein molecules present in the flow-through fraction. PGE2 is a biologically active, heat-labile, small molecule (molecular weight = 352.5 Da) that is present in high quantity in SP [30]. Importantly, PGE2 is known to stimulate PTGS2 expression in various cells, including cervical adenocarcinoma cells [21]. We hypothesized that PGE2 could be the factor responsible for PTGS2 induction. To test this hypothesis, VK-2 cells were treated with PGE2 receptor antagonist AH 6809, which has equal affinity to multiple PGE2 receptors [31]. SP induction of PTGS2 was completely inhibited in the presence of the PGE2 receptor antagonist. Furthermore, we confirmed the stimulatory activity of PGE2 by testing dmPGE2 (a stable form of PGE2), which caused a dose-dependent increase in PTGS2 expression in VK-2 cells (Fig. 6D).
PGE2 Levels in Seminal Plasma Correlate with Seminal Plasma Ability to Stimulate PTGS2 Expression in VK-2 Cells
PGE2 was quantified in several individual SP samples showing distinctly high or low PTGS2 induction capacity using liquid chromatography (Fig. 7, A and B). PTGS2 protein levels in VK-2 cells were evaluated by PTGS2 immunoblot band intensities normalized to ACTB. A positive correlation (Pearson correlation coefficient R2 = 0.89, P = 0.016) between the concentration of PGE2 and PTGS2 levels was observed (Fig. 7C), supporting the hypothesis that PGE2 in SP is implicated in PTGS2 induction in vaginal epithelial cells.
SP Induces PTGS2 Expression in Ectocervical and Vaginal Tissue Explants
Next, we verified the expression of PTGS2 in response to SP in ectocervical tissue explants. Cultured cervical tissues were treated with pooled SP at 75% in medium for 24 h. A clear increase in PTGS2 protein expression was observed by IHC staining (Fig. 8A) and was further corroborated by immunoblotting using anti-PTGS2 antibodies (Fig. 8B). Similar results indicating increase in PTGS2 expression were obtained for vaginal explants treated with 75% SP for 24 h (Fig. 9).
DISCUSSION
Earlier, we reported that diverse proinflammatory stimuli cause expression of PTGS2 in human vaginal epithelial cells [25, 29]. PTGS2 (or COX-2) is an inducible enzyme that is essential in promoting inflammation [32–34]. It catalyzes the rate-limiting step in the synthesis of prostaglandins. A major PTGS2 product, PGE2, is considered to be the primary culprit of inflammation-related changes in tissues [23]. Here, we report that SP causes transcriptional and translational dose-dependent induction of PTGS2 in human vaginal epithelial cells.
SP induction of PTGS2 in the female genital tract has been demonstrated in endometrial tissues of horses and pigs and in human cervical adenocarcinoma cells [21, 35, 36]. More recently, SP-induced PTGS2 expression was also observed in normal cervical biopsies as part of an inflammatory-like response postulated to be necessary for promotion of fertility [16, 20].
One of the central pathways involved in cellular inflammatory responses and PTGS2 upregulation is the NF-kB signaling pathway. In addition, different MAPKs may also be activated in response to proinflammatory stimuli and engaged in PTGS2 expression [37]. Previously, we have reported that NF-kB and MAPK pathways are involved in PTGS2 expression in vaginal cells in response to the proinflammatory spermicide N-9 [25]. We also found that these pathways are implicated in PTGS2 upregulation via TLRs stimulated by microbial pathogens (unpublished results). Here, we demonstrate that the same signaling pathways, NF-kB, p38MAPK, and ERK1/2, are also activated by SP and that their activation is responsible for PTGS2 induction (Fig. 3).
Given the commonality in induction pathways, we wanted to evaluate the impact of SP on PTGS2 expression in the presence of other proinflammatory stimuli commonly present in the vaginal environment. We found that SP acts in synergy with TLR ligands, such as Pam, LTA, and IMQ and the vaginal spermicide N-9. We demonstrated that PTGS2 expression induced by these compounds is strongly potentiated by SP (Fig. 4). These data imply that, in vivo, SP could favor or increase inflammatory responses triggered by preexisting cevicovaginal infections. In addition, SP from men harboring genital infections could be more potent in eliciting inflammatory responses in the female genital mucosa than SP from healthy men. This is in agreement with reports of higher incidences of cervicitis in women whose partners are diagnosed with urethritis [38, 39]. Furthermore, our data suggest that exposure to SP in sexually active women may worsen mucosal inflammation caused by vaginal topical products, such as those containing N-9 (commercial spermicides) or IMQ (products to treat genital/anal warts) as active ingredients. Tested in a phase III clinical trial as an HIV microbicide, N-9 not only failed to protect women but actually increased susceptibility to HIV infection if used frequently [40]. Cervicovaginal mucosal inflammation induced by frequent exposure to N-9 has been postulated as a causative factor for the observed increased rate of HIV acquisition [41, 42]. Our data further suggest that frequent exposure to SP in this population of commercial sex workers could have exacerbated N-9-induced inflammatory response, thus increasing the propensity for HIV infection.
We have observed considerable variation in the PTGS2-inducing capacity of SP among different individuals (Fig. 5), which could be the result of interindividual variability in SP composition [43, 44]. We have also noted some variation among SP samples from the same individual. SP variability could be due to differences in genetic polymorphisms, lifestyle, sexual practices, and use of medications [45]. Other significant factors are subclinical infections and variations in the genital microbiome. Seasonal variations due to changes in daylight and temperature could in turn explain the differences in SP from the same person [45, 46].
Seminal plasma is a complex fluid that contains a multitude of biologically active molecules [43]. In our attempts to pinpoint the factor(s) responsible for PTGS2 stimulation, we found that small molecules, possibly of a nonprotein nature, might be plausible candidates (Fig. 6A). We hypothesized that these could be prostaglandins of the E-series, which are present in SP at uniquely high concentration (of at least three orders of magnitude higher than in other human fluids and tissues) [30]. PGE mediates its activity through four subtypes of G-protein-coupled receptors, EP1–EP4 [33]. We demonstrated that PTGS2 expression was abrogated in the presence of AH-6809, an antagonist of prostaglandin receptors that blocks EP1, EP2, and EP3. AH-6809 also suppresses receptor of PGD2 [31]; however PGD2 is not present in SP, which justifies the suggestion that the prostaglandin(s) involved in PTGS2 induction by SP belong to PGE family (Fig. 6C). One of the most important PGEs known to be involved in inflammation is PGE2, a low-molecular-weight (352.5 Da) component present in SP. Importantly, being a product of PTGS2 activity, PGE2 displays a feedback reaction by inducing PTGS2 expression in diverse cell types [21, 47]. This role of PGE2 was confirmed by the direct effect of PGE2 on PTGS2 stimulation in human vaginal cells when incubated with dmPGE2 (Fig. 6D). At the same time, the role of other semen PGEs in PTGS2 induction cannot be excluded.
To further test the hypothesis of the role of PGE2 in PTGS2 induction and find out whether there is a correlation between these two factors, we selected five SP samples with high and low PTGS2 response for quantitation of their PGE2 content using liquid chromatography. We observed a positive correlation between PGE2 levels and PTGS2 expression (Fig. 7B). Although more experiments are needed to confirm this correlation, an association between PGE2 level in SP and SP ability to stimulate PTGS2 expression appears evident. PTGS2 upregulation in the genital tract induced by SP may result in an even higher level of PGE2, which would further stimulate mucosal expression of PTGS2 [48].
Several studies have demonstrated a direct effect of PGE2 on HIV-1 infectivity. PGE2 promotes replication of the virus [49] and activates HIV-1 long terminal repeat (LTR)-mediated gene activity in T-cells [50]. Activation of HIV-LTR was also observed in the presence of SP [11]. This would point to a direct effect of SP in promoting HIV infection, separate from the reported facilitating effect of SP-derived amyloid fibrils [13, 51].
Furthermore, SP may also facilitate HIV infection indirectly. Involvement of PGE2 in inflammation is well established. Acting via EP receptors, PGE2 is capable of modulating the immune cells functions, and their activation might increase HIV-1 capture, transmission, and/or infection. A novel role of PGE2 in immune activation as a factor that facilitates expansion of Th17 subset of T helper cells is now emerging [52]. Importantly, evidence is accumulating that Th17 cells are preferential targets for HIV-1/SIV [53, 54].
Recently, another molecule, transforming growth factor- β (TGF-β), which is present in extremely high concentration in human semen, has been shown to induce activation of a number of inflammation-related genes, including PTGS2 in the female genital tract [55]. There are three isoforms of TGF-β in semen (TGF-β1, TGF-β2, TGF-β3); they exist predominantly in a latent form complexed with the latency-associated peptide (LAP). Physiological release from an inactive complex can be accomplished by proteolytic degradation of LAP. Physicochemical activation of TGF-β can be achieved by heat. Maximum activation of TGF-β2 and TGF-β3 occurs at 100°C, while TGF-β1 is denatured at this temperature[56]. Heat-activated TGF-β isoforms can account for PTGS2-inducing activity that we observed in vaginal cells treated with thermally treated SP (Fig. 6). It has been proposed that TGF-β can interact with PGEs to cause inflammation-related response [55].
It has been known for several decades that SP causes an inflammatory-like response in the female genital mucosa [18]. Increased migration of immune cells to the site of semen deposition, called leukocytic reaction [17, 57], and expression and release of diverse proinflammatory cytokines stimulated by SP have been observed in different mammals, including humans [58]. It has been proposed that these events facilitate conception [18]. While being physiologically beneficial for reproductive functions, the influx of immune cells that are targets for HIV infection may enhance HIV acquisition and transmission.
In conclusion, seminal plasma induces PTGS2 in vaginal epithelial cells through activation of NF-κB and MAPKs. SP-induced PTGS2 expression follows a specific and dose-dependent response and shows interindividual variability. Semen PGE2 is involved in the PTGS2 induction. Increased mucosal expression of PTGS2, especially in the presence of microbial antigens and other proinflammatory stimuli, may have implications for HIV-1 transmission and the design of strategies to prevent sexually transmitted infections.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors would like to thank Dr. Amrita Cheema and her team at Proteomics and Metabolomics Shared Resource, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center of Georgetown University, for quantitation of PGE2 in seminal plasma.
REFERENCES
Notes
[1] Financial disclosure Supported by CONRAD intramural funds (G.D.) from the U.S. Agency for International Development (grant GPO-8-00-08-00005-00) and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (grant 41266). The views of the authors do not necessarily represent those of their funding agencies. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.