Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
26 June 2017 Chapter 2: Inoceramid Bivalves from the Coniacian and Basal Santonian (Upper Cretaceous) of the Western Canada Foreland Basin
Ireneusz Walaszczyk, A. Guy Plint, Neil H. Landman
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Inoceramid bivalves are the dominant invertebrate fauna of the Coniacian and basal Santonian of the Western Canada Foreland Basin in western Alberta. In the upper lower Coniacian through to basal Santonian, six successive faunas are recognized, which provide the basis for corresponding, formally defined inoceramid zones. From bottom upward these are the zones of: Cremnoceramus crassus crassus /C. deformis deformis, Inoceramus gibbosus, Volviceramus koeneni, Volviceramus involutus, Sphenoceramus subcardissoides, and Sphenoceramus ex gr. pachti. Particular faunas represent assemblages known widely from the Euramerican biogeographic region, although they characterize mostly its northern, boreal area. The inoceramid-based biostratigraphic scheme allows correlation with other parts of the North American Western Interior and with parts of the Euramerican biogeographic region.

The studied succession provides a good record of the Inoceramus gibbosus Zone, which characterizes the topmost lower Coniacian. This zone, first recognized from northern Germany, is usually absent, both in Europe and in North America, due to a stratigraphic gap resulting from a eustatic lowstand. The base of the middle Coniacian is marked by the abrupt appearance of the taxonomically variable Volviceramus fauna (V. koeneni (Müller), V. exogyroides (Meek and Hayden)), with associated Inoceramus undabundus Meek and Hayden and Volviceramus cardinalensis, newly described herein. Scaphites (Scaphites) ventricosus Meek and Hayden, the ammonite marker of the base of the middle Coniacian first appears in the late early Coniacian. The base of the upper Coniacian marks the first appearance of the characteristic northern inoceramid species Sphenoceramus subcardissoides (Schlüter), the appearance of which coincides with Scaphites (Scaphites) depressus Reeside, the ammonite marker of this boundary. Close to this boundary Volviceramus stotti also appears, which is newly described from the Canadian sections. The base of the Santonian corresponds to the abrupt appearance of Sphenoceramus ex gr. pachti (Arkhangelsky).

The studied sections demonstrate that the appearance of new inoceramid faunas (lowest occurrence of Cremnoceramus crassus crassus (Petrascheck), of various species of Volviceramus, Sphenoceramus subcardissoides (Schlüter) and of S. ex gr. pachti) takes place immediately above major marine flooding surfaces, suggesting a close correspondence between evolutionary and/or migration events and episodes of relative sea-level rise.

INTRODUCTION

The Coniacian and Santonian (Upper Cretaceous) succession of the Western Canada Foreland Basin is characterized by a rich molluscan (principally ammonites and inoceramids) record. Recent fieldwork on sections exposed in the foredeep in Alberta (see Plint et al., this volume) allowed the collection of fossils from the most complete sections of Coniacian strata in the basin. Each specimen was precisely located in a high-resolution allostratigraphic framework that extended throughout the foredeep (Plint et al., this issue). Consequently, the palaeontological material could be placed within a high-resolution stratigraphical, temporal, and spatial framework. This paper provides the description of the inoceramid faunas, including their taxonomy, biostratigraphy, and biogeographic characteristics. The details of the physical stratigraphy, sedimentary facies and tectono-stratigraphic evolution of the area are provided in a companion paper by Plint et al. (this issue); the ammonites are documented in a companion paper by Landman et al. (this issue).

GEOLOGICAL SETTING AND LOCALITIES

The studied area lies within the foredeep of the Western Canada Foreland Basin in western Alberta, embracing the area between the Cutpick Creek section in the north (close to the town of Grande Cache), south to Kevin, in northern Montana, spanning a distance of about 750 km (fig. 1). The Coniacian and basal Santonian strata studied herein are dominated by mudstone, with subordinate sandstone, and belong to the Muskiki and Marshybank members in the lower part of the Wapiabi Formation. The lower boundary of the studied interval is placed at the top of the underlying Cardium Formation, at disconformity surface E7 of Plint et al. (1986). The top of the studied interval is placed a short distance above surface SS0, that marks the base of the Santonian, as defined biostratigraphically by the first occurrence of the ammonite Clioscaphites saxitonianus (McLearn, 1929) (see Landman et al., this issue), the first occurrence of the inoceramid, Sphenoceramus ex gr. pachti (Arkhangelsky, 1912), and in allostratigraphic terms by a major marine flooding surface (Plint et al., this issue).

The entire studied succession comprises a series of upward-coarsening, upward-shoaling packages, bounded by marine flooding surfaces. The regional correlation of marine flooding surfaces, based on data from abundant wireline well logs, numerous outcrop sections and a few cores, allowed the subdivision of the entire succession into 24 informal allomembers (CA1 through CA24), interpreted to be the result of high-frequency eustatic sea-level changes. The surfaces bounding allomembers are interpreted to approximate time lines and hence the allomembers can be considered to represent approximate chronostratigraphic subdivisions of the succession (Plint et al., this issue).

The material studied comes from 19 sections, located mostly in the Rocky Mountain Foothills (fig. 1). The graphic logs for each studied section, the stratigraphical location of the specimens studied herein, and their location within the informal allomembers are provided by Plint et al. (this issue). The summary chart showing the stratigraphic ranges of inoceramids in relation to the allostratigraphic framework is shown in figure 2.

BIOSTRATIGRAPHY

The biostratigraphic data are derived from allomembers CA1 to CA24 (bounded by surfaces E7, CS1 through CS24, and SS0), spanning the upper lower to upper Coniacian (fig. 1, and Plint et al., this issue). In all intervals where biostratigraphic data are available, both the bio- and physical stratigraphies form a consistent succession. Because the allomembers may be interpreted as chronounits (see Plint et al., this issue), then, strictly speaking, the biostratigraphic zones, as proposed herein, are chrono-biostratigraphic; the ranges of particular taxa given are composite ranges for the entire area, based on the allostratigraphic (physical) correlation of the units that contain the fossils. In most cases the first appearance of taxa seem to correspond, as expected, to flooding surfaces that form the boundaries of allomembers.

FIG. 1.

Map of localities and the location of the study area with respect to the outline map of North America.

f01_53.jpg

Six biostratigraphic zones are distinguished within the studied interval (figs. 2, 3). All are defined as interval zones. They are characterized, in ascending order, below. The paleobiogeographic terms used are after Kauffman (1973). The correlation with previously proposed Western Interior inoceramid zonations (of Kauffman et al., 1993; and of Collom, 2001), as well as with the European subdivision (as compiled by Tröger, 1989), are shown in figure 3.

Cremnoceramus crassus crassus-Cremnoceramus deformis deformis interval Zone: The base of the zone is defined by the first occurrence of any of the index taxa, and its top is placed at the first occurrence of Inoceramus gibbosus Schlüter, 1877 as defined herein. In physical terms, the base coincides with surface E7, which marks the base of allomember CA1. As the lowest occurrence of I. gibbosus is recorded in allomember CA2, the top of the zone is placed at the base of allomember CA2. The index taxa range higher, up to the middle part of allomember CA4. The other inoceramid taxa are: Cremnoceramus crassus inconstans (Woods, 1912) and Tethyoceramus spp.

FIG. 2.

Inoceramid ranges and zonation plotted against interpreted bathymetric changes in the interval studied. E5 through E7; CS1 through CS23, and SS0-erosional surfaces; CA1 through CA24-allomembers.

f02_53.jpg

The zone is widely recognizable within the entire Euramerican biogeographic region, northern Mediterranean Province, as well as in the South Atlantic Subprovince (e.g., Marcinowski et al., 1996; Walaszczyk and Wood, 1998; Kauffman and Bengtson, 1985; Walaszczyk et al., 2010, 2012, 2013).

In ammonite terms the zone corresponds to the uppermost part of the Scaphites (Scaphites) preventricosus Zone (figs. 2, 3; see also Landman et al., this issue).

The zone is well documented in all of the surface exposures that encompass the lower part of the succession: Wapiabi Creek, Chungo Creek, Blackstone River, Cutpick Creek, West Thistle Creek, and Bighorn Dam (fig. 1).

Inoceramus gibbosus interval Zone: The base of the zone is placed at the first occurrence of the index taxon, as here defined, and its top is at the first occurrence of the inoceramid genus Volviceramus. In allostratigraphic terms the zone corresponds to allomembers CA2, CA3, and CA4 (fig. 2).

FIG. 3.

Inoceramid zonation of the Coniacian and basal Santonian as recognized herein, and its correlation with the zonations of Tröger, 1989, Kauffman et al., 1993, and Collom, 2001.

f03_53.jpg

Inoceramids are quite variable in the zone. In addition to the index taxon, sulcate forms of Inoceramus ex gr. lamarcki Parkinson, 1819, Inoceramus sp., Tethyoceramus wandereri (Andert, 1911), and various species of Cremnoceramus were noted, which continue from the zone below.

In ammonite terms, the zone corresponds to the basal part of the Scaphites (S.) ventricosus Zone (fig. 2; see Plint et al., this issue). The latter species appears earlier than hitherto assumed, in the latest early Coniacian. In the U.S. Western Interior sections, the apparent coincidence of the boundary between the zones of S. (S.) preventricosus and S. (S.) ventricosus with the first appearance of Volviceramus is because of an hiatus at this level that spans at least the I. gibbosus Zone (see remarks in Walaszczyk and Cobban, 2006).

The zone was first documented in the Staffhorst Mine section in northern Germany (Walaszczyk and Wood in Niebuhr et al., 1999). Based on inoceramid assemblages reported from Eastern Europe (e.g., Glazunova, 1972) it is apparently also present there. In other parts of Europe and North America, the zone seems to be missing due to nondeposition and/or subsequent erosion. The zone is best documented in the sections on Sheep River, Blackstone River, Wapiabi Creek, and Chungo Creek (fig. 1).

Volviceramus koeneni interval Zone: The lower boundary of the zone is defined by the first occurrence of the index taxon and its top by the first occurrence of Volviceramus involutus (Sowerby, 1828), its evolutionary successor (fig. 2). The base of the zone is provisionally accepted as the base of the middle Coniacian (e.g., Tröger, 1989; Kauffman et al., 1996). The presence of the zone of Volviceramus koeneni (Müller, 1888) below the first appearance of V. involutus was documented in a series of reports (Stille, 1909; Heinz, 1928a; Tröger, 1969, 1974), and appears regularly in compilations of inoceramid zonations (Tröger, 1981, 1989). In the studied sections, definite V. involutus appears in allomember CA9. Consequently, the top of the V. koeneni Zone is placed at the base of this allomember.

Besides the index taxon, the zone is characterized by Volviceramus cardinalensis, sp. nov., Volviceramys exogyroides (Meek and Hayden, 1862), Inoceramus undabundus Meek and Hayden, 1862, and Inoceramus kleini Müller, 1888. The zone is best documented in the sections on Chungo Creek and at the Bighorn Dam (fig. 1).

Volviceramus involutus interval Zone: The base of the zone is defined by the first occurrence of the index taxon, and its top by the first occurrence of Sphenoceramus subcardissoides (Schlüter, 1877). In the allostratigraphic scheme applied herein, it spans an interval from suface CS7 up to surface CS15. Because the first appearance of S. subcardissoides coincides with the first appearance of Scaphites (S.) depressus Reeside, 1927, which marks the base of the upper Coniacian, the V. involutus Zone characterizes the upper part of the middle Coniacian.

The zone is dominated by volviceramids. The index taxon is actually rare. The forms that dominate are: V. exogyroides and V. cardinalensis, sp. nov. The V. involutus Zone corresponds to the upper part of the S. (S.) ventricosus Zone. The zone is well documented in the sections at Bighorn Dam, Sheep River, and Chungo Creek (fig. 1).

Sphenoceramus subcardissoides interval Zone: The base of the zone is defined by the first appearance of the index taxon and its top by the first appearance of Sphenoceramus ex gr. pachti (Arkhangelsky, 1912). In terms of the allostratigraphic scheme, the zone ranges between surface CS14 and the top of the Coniacian, marked by surface SS0 (fig. 2). Although the boundaries of the zone are well defined, its internal characteristics concerning inoceramid faunas and their evolution are poorly known. Starting with surface CS19 and ranging up to surface CS23, there is almost no inoceramid record. The reason is that most of the upper part of the upper Coniacian succession is preserved only to the north of our studied area, in northwestern Alberta and adjacent British Columbia. Because of differential subsidence to the northwest and flexural upwarp to the southeast, upper Coniacian strata were either not deposited, or were bevelled off across much of the studied area (see Plint et al., this issue: figs. 4, 26). In addition to the index taxon, the zone is characterized by V. involutus, V. cardinalensis, and Volviceramus stotti, sp. nov. (fig. 2).

In ammonite terms the S. subcardissoides Zone spans approximately the zone of Scaphites (S.) depressus, defined as the interval zone, ranging between the first occurrences of S. (S.) depressus Reeside, 1927 and of Clioscaphites saxitonianus (McLearn, 1929) (fig. 2). The lower part of the zone is documented in a number of sections.

Sphenoceramus ex gr. pachti interval Zone: Only the basal part of the zone was studied. Consequently, only the lower boundary, marked by the first occurrence of the index taxon, is defined herein. In allostratigraphic terms, the base of the zone is placed at surface SS0, which is taken herein as the base of the Santonian. The part of the zone, studied herein, is invariably characterized by the index taxon. In ammonite terms, the base of the zone coincides with the base of the zone of C. saxitonianus (fig. 2). The zone is best represented in the sections on West Thistle Creek, Cardinal River, and Cripple Creek. It is also documented in the sections on Ram River, Bighorn Dam, James River, and Kevin MT (fig. 1).

STAGE AND SUBSTAGE BOUNDARIES

Coniacian Substage Subdivision: There is no formal subdivision of the Coniacian Stage into substages, and what is currently used is a proposal that was generally approved during the Second International Symposium on Cretaceous Stage Boundaries, Brussels 1995. Accordingly, the base of the middle Coniacian is taken at the first occurrence of the inoceramid genus Volviceramus, and specifically of the species V. koeneni, and the base of the upper Coniacian at the first occurrence of the inoceramid species Magadiceramus subquadratus (Schlüter, 1887) (see Kauffman et al., 1996). Actually, these definitions follow the former German subdivision of the stage as used at least since the 1980s (see Tröger, 1989).

The appearance and widespread occurrence of Volviceramus, including V. koeneni, in the studied Canadian sections allows for direct biostratigraphic recognition of the base of the middle Coniacian. More problematic however, is the recognition of the base of the upper Coniacian. Magadiceramus subquadratus (and the genus in general) is a more southern form, and no specimens of the genus were found during this study. In the U.S. Western Interior, the genus has not been reported north of Wyoming (see Cobban et al., 2005). In this context, it is noteworthy that Collom (2001) reported specimens, referred by him to Magadiceramus, from as far north as Bad Heart River in north-central Alberta. At least two of his specimens (Collom, 2001: pl. 12, fig. 8; pl. 13, fig. 3) appear to be reliable Magadiceramus. (However, his specimen from Ellesmere Island, referred by him to Magadiceramus subquadratus (Schlüter) (Collom, 2001, pl. 39, fig. 6), belongs to Sphenoceramus). Even accepting the presence of these two specimens, however, it seems that the occurrence of the genus in Alberta is accidental and cannot be used confidently in biostratigraphic study. In contrast to Magadiceramus, a very distinct biostratigraphic horizon contains Sphenoceramus subcardissoides, recorded from the entire studied area. Based on allostratigraphic interpretation of the horizon at which S. subcardissoides is first found, it appears that this species forms a distinct isochronous event (first appearance event) across the area, immediately above surface CS14. Its record from the higher part of the succession is, however, poorly constrained, although it is known from Ram River and Cardinal River in allomember CA24 at the top of the Coniacian. Sphenoceramus subcardissoides was reported from various areas in Europe, and in well-dated sections it appears at, or very close to the base of the upper Coniacian, as defined by Magadiceramus (see Tröger, 1974, 1989; Tröger and Christensen, 1991; Walaszczyk and Wood in Niebuhr et al., 1999). Consequently, the species is treated as a good secondary marker of the base of the upper Coniacian. The location of its first appearance close to the base of the upper Coniacian, as currently defined, is also confirmed by its coappearance with the ammonite Scaphites (S.) depressus (Landman et al., this issue), and seems to be confirmed by the carbon-isotope correlations between the Alberta succession and the European standard curve (Jarvis et al., 2006; see Plint et al., this issue: fig. 25).

The Western Interior Scaphites Subdivision of the Coniacian: In the American Western Interior, the Coniacian substages have long been defined based on ammonites of the genus Scaphites (Cobban, 1951). The base of the middle and upper Coniacian (as defined by inoceramids) are currently defined by the first appearances of Scaphites (S.) ventricosus and of Scaphites (S.) depressus respectively (Kennedy and Cobban, 1991; Cobban et al., 2005, 2006; Walaszczyk and Cobban, 2006). Based on the record in the sections studied herein, this correlation between the ammonite and inoceramid zonations requires some amendment in the case of the lower/middle Coniacian boundary. Based on our data, it appears that S. (S.) ventricosus does not coappear with Volviceramus, but appears slightly earlier, in the latest early Coniacian. The apparent coincidence of first occurrences of both taxa seems to result from a gap at this boundary (spanning the Inoceramus gibbosus Zone) in most of the sections south of Alberta (Walaszczyk and Cobban, 2006; Walaszczyk et al., 2014b). What is confirmed, however, is the coincidence of the first occurrence of S. (S.) depressus with the inoceramid species S. subcardissoides, which seems to be a good proxy for the base of the upper Coniacian, as defined by the first occurrence of Magadiceramus subquadratus.

Coniacian-Santonian boundary: This boundary is defined by the first appearance of the inoceramid species Cladoceramus undulatoplicatus (Roemer, 1852) and the boundary was recently formally approved by the International Stratigraphical Commission (Lamolda et al., 2014). However, C. undulatoplicatus, like Magadiceramus, is a more southern form. In the North American Western Interior it has never been reported from north of southern Wyoming (Cobban et al., 2005). Another biostratigraphic proxy for this boundary, often used in the American Western Interior, is the ammonite species C. saxitonianus (see Scott and Cobban, 1964; Cobban et al., 2005, 2006; Walaszczyk and Cobban, 2006, 2007). This latter species occurs commonly in the studied area (see Landman et al. and Plint et al., this issue) and may be reliably used to locate the base of the Santonian. Additionally, in the studied sections, its first appearance coincides with the first occurrence of the inoceramid Sphenoceramus ex gr. pachti. Although the clade of Sphenoceramus pachti/cardissoides first appears slightly earlier than C. undulatoplicatus, which is the basal Santonian boundary marker (see Seitz, 1962, 1965; Tröger, 1989; Remin, 2004), the form described herein differs from the typical representatives of Arkhangelsky's species and, based on the ammonite record, coappears with C. saxitonianus at the base of the Santonian Stage.

BIOGEOGRAPHY AND EVOLUTION

During the Late Cretaceous, the studied area was a part of the Western Interior Endemic Center, which belonged to the North American Province and, together with the North European Province, formed the Euramerican Biogeographic Region (subdivision according to Kauffman, 1973). In terms of inoceramid faunas, the region was fluctuating between a highly provincial state (early-middle Cenomanian; middle-early late Turonian), to a state characterized by strong faunal unification (late Cenomanian-early Turonian; late late Turonian till early late Maastrichtian). However, even during the unification intervals, the region was an evolving and highly dynamic system, controlled mostly by climatic and eustatic changes.

The interval studied herein, i.e., the late early Coniacian to early Santonian, represented a time of inoceramid unification on a scale of the entire Euramerican Region. At the same time, however, the inoceramid assemblages were characterized by a high turnover rate. There was a total exchange of inoceramid faunas at the early to middle Coniacian boundary and at the Coniacian- Santonian boundary. Additionally, there was a marked faunal exchange at the middle to late Coniacian boundary (fig. 2). The former assumption of a lack of external (environmental) perturbations during that time (eustasy, climate) has made it difficult to identify the mechanism that triggered these changes. The studied sections have revealed, however, a close correlation between turnover/exchange intervals in inoceramid evolution and important bathymetric changes, reflected in marked facies changes and regional erosional discontinuities. New faunas typically (but not always), accompany transgressive episodes that follow the main regressive troughs (fig. 2; and discussion in Plint et al., this issue). The main exception to this seems to be the middle to upper Coniacian boundary, which in the short term coincides with a high-frequency flooding surface but in the long term marks the onset of what is interpreted as major shallowing, defined by a dramatic change from weakly bioturbated to intensely bioturbated sediment across surface CS14 (Plint et al., this issue). This could also coincide with an oceanographic change from poorly oxygenated to well-oxgygenated bottom water. The time equivalency of the recognized turning points in inoceramid evolution all over the Euramerican biogeographic region suggests that the bathymetric trends recognized herein were of a eustatic nature (see Plint et al., this issue).

The precise cause of the correlation between bathymetric fluctuations and faunal changes is, however, unclear. It seems clear that both in-place evolution and immigration/emigration events played a part. The other external factor in inoceramid evolution, which is difficult to assess at the moment, seems to be climate. In the studied interval, inoceramid assemblages were characterized by broad north-south biogeographic shifts, which at least in part, could have been climatically controlled. A profound change is noted at the early to middle Coniacian boundary. Whereas the early Coniacian inoceramid assemblages of the studied area ranged southward all over the Western Interior Basin, the middle to late Coniacian and early Santonian faunas demonstrate a clear north-south pattern, with two biogeographic biohores present, with the boundary between them located in the northern part of the U.S. Western Interior. In the middle Coniacian, the southern biohore was characterized by the co-occurrence of Volviceramus and Platyceramus, with the eventual disappearance of Volviceramus in the far south. Conversely, Platyceramus is absent from the northern biohore, which included the Canadian portion of the basin. In the late Coniacian and early Santonian, the northern biohore, including the study area, was characterized by the Boreal genus Sphenoceramus. This genus is generally absent south of Montana. (Some short-lived Sphenoceramus excursion events to the south are noted later in the Santonian.) In contrast, the southern biohore was characterized by the genera Magadiceramus, Cladoceramus, Platyceramus, and Cordiceramus, which only occasionally are noted in the north.

This biogeographic pattern is not restricted to the American Western Interior but characterizes the entire Euramerican biogeographic region. The appearance of distinct zonal faunas among inoceramids may suggest climatic zoning in at least middle to late Coniacian and early Santonian time, established after the breakdown of more equitable conditions that prevailed during early Coniacian time.

TERMS AND REPOSITORIES

Terminology and measurements of the external morphologic features of inoceramid shell are modified after Harries et al. (1996) and are shown in figure 4.

The specimens described in this paper are housed in the Royal Tyrell Museum, Drumheller, Alberta, Canada, and are prefixed TMP; some comparative material used here is from U.S. National Museum, Washington, D.C., and prefixed USNM. The geographic location of source localities are shown in figure 1 (modified from Plint et al., this issue). The geological logs of particular sections, with their allostratigraphic interpretation and specimen location are in Plint et al. (this issue).

SYSTEMATIC PALEONTOLOGY

BIVALVIA LINNÉ, 1758
PTERIOMORPHA BUERLEN, 1944
PTERIOIDA NEWELL, 1965
PTERIOIDEA GRAY, 1847
INOCERAMIDAE ZITTEL, 1881 (ICZN 473)
Genus Inoceramus Sowerby, 1814

  • Type Species: Inoceramus cuvieri Sowerby, 1814, by subsequent designation of Cox, 1969: 315.

  • Inoceramus ex gr. lamarcki Parkinson, 1819
    (sulcate variety)
    Figures 5A, B, E, F

  • Material: Two single left valves; TMP 2016.041.0097 from Wapiabi Creek and TMP 2016.041.0233 from West Thistle Creek.

  • Measurements: See table 1.

  • Description: TMP 2016.041.0097 (fig. 5A, B) is a moderately large (hmax = 84.5 mm) left valve (LV) internal mold, with the disc well preserved, but with the posterior auricle missing. The disc is triangular in outline, orthocline, with the beak curved anterodorsally, projecting slightly above the hinge line. The anterior margin is long, concave below the umbo, straight ventralward. The ventral margin is regularly rounded. The disc is weakly to moderately inflated, with maximum inflation in the umbonal part. The anterior wall is moderately high, steep, and almost perpendicular to the commissure below the umbo. The disc is ornamented with widely spaced, apparently regular (although deformed in our specimen) commarginal rugae, slightly asymmetrical with their leading edges slightly steeper, and with rounded edges and interrugae spaces.

    TMP 2016.041.0233 (fig. 5E, F) is an internal mold of the moderately large LV (hmax = 100.5 mm), with its beak and most of its posterior auricle missing. The preserved fragment of the posterior auricle suggests, however, that it was extended and relatively large, of the type similar to Inoceramus lusatiae Andert. This specimen differs from TMP 2016.041.0097 in possessing a less steep anterior wall below the umbo and in the presence of a better-developed radial sulcus, posteriorly of the disc axis. The sulcus is shallow and poorly developed; it begins at approximately 35 mm axial distance. The ornament is of the same type in both specimens.

  • Discussion: The two specimens clearly belong to the Inoceramus lamarcki group. They may be closely allied to Inoceramus annulatus Goldfuss, 1836, or Inoceramus lusatiae Andert, 1911 (the latter is suggested by the type of the posterior auricle in the larger specimen). From both of these species, our specimens differ in possessing the radial sulcus. This feature appears in various lineages/ clades of the “lamarcki” group (e.g., in the Turonian Inoceramus hobetsensis Nagao and Matsumoto, 1939, Inoceramus flaccidus White, 1879, or in Turonian representatives of Inoceramus lamarcki Parkinson, 1819, as known from the U.S. Western Interior; see Noda, 1975, Kauffman, 1977; Kauffman et al., 1978, Noda and Matsumoto, 1998, Walaszczyk and Cobban, 2000), but its taxonomic significance is not clear (Noda, 1975; Noda and Matsumoto, 1998).

  • Occurrence: Both specimens are from the topmost part of the lower Coniacian.

  • TABLE 1

    Measurements of species.

    Abbreviations to measurements are shown in figure 4; n indicates the number of ribs counted along the growth axis at 20 to 50 mm from the beak.

    t01a_53.gif

    Continued

    t01b_53.gif

    Inoceramus gibbosus Schlüter, 1877
    Figures 5C, D, G

  • 1877. Inoceramus gibbosus Schlüter: 271.

  • 1888. Inoceramus percostatus Müller: 413, pl. 17, fig. 3.

  • ?non 1911. Inoceramus percostatus Müller. Andert: 56, pl. 5, fig. 4.

  • 1929. Inoceramus dankeri Heinz var. anderti Heinz. Heinz: 686, figs. 45.

  • 1929. Inoceramus gibbosus Schlüter. Heine: 50, pl. 4, figs. 2022.

  • 1929. Inoceramus percostatus Müller. Heine: 46, pl. 3, figs. 1417.

  • 1929. Inoceramus bilobatus Müller. Heine: 49, pl. 4, figs. 1819.

  • ?non 1934. Inoceramus percostatus Müller. Andert: 119, pl. 5, fig. 4.

  • 1958. Inoceramus russiensis Nikitin. Bodylevski: 78, pl. 29, fig. 1; pl. 31, fig. 1.

  • 1959. Inoceramus percostatus Müller. Drobrov and Pavlova: 145, pl. 12, fig. 3.

  • non 1963. Inoceramus percostatus Müller. Assmus: 45, pl. 9, fig. 1.

  • ?non 1969. Inoceramus percostatus Müller. Khalafova: 177, pl. 13, fig. 4; pl. 14, fig. 1 [pl. 13, fig. 4 = deformis group; pl. 14, fig. 1 = ?Tethyoceramus sp.]

  • 1972. Inoceramus percostatus Müller. Glazunova: 59, pl. 2, figs. 12; pl. 3, fig. 2; pl. 9, fig. 1, pl. 13, fig. 6.

  • 1972. Inoceramus percostatus Müller subsp. gorenkaensis subsp. nov., Glazunova: 60, pl. 4, figs. 12; pl. 6, figs. 12; pl. 7, fig. 1; pl. 9, fig. 2.

  • 2006. Inoceramus gibbosus Schlüter, 1877. Walaszczyk and Cobban: 273; text-figs. 21, 12.11 and 13.5.

  • Type: The holotype, by monotypy, is the original of Schlüter (1877: 271) first illustrated by Heine (1929: pl. 4, figs. 2022) from the upper Coniacian of Osterfeld Mine near Oberhausen, in Westphalia, northern Germany.

  • Material: Twenty-six specimens in total, most of which are fragmentarily preserved. TMP 2016.041.0110 through 2016.041.0127, from Blackstone River. TMP 2016.041.0236 from Thistle Creek. TMP 2016.041.0098, 2016.041.0089, 2016.041.0090, and 2016.041.0095, from Wapiabi Creek. TMP 2016.041.0170 and 2016.041.0172 from Chungo Creek. One unnumbered specimen from Sheep River.

  • Measurements: See table 1.

  • Description and remarks: Most of the specimens in our collection are small-sized, juvenile fragments from the Blackstone River section. They show, however, the upright form, pointed beak, and triangular outline, with well-developed, distinct rugae, covered with well-developed, sharp-edged growth lines, typical for the species.

    The best preserved is specimen TMP 2016.041.0110 from Blackstone River; the major part of the adult stage is well preserved (fig. 5D). Its umbonal part is poorly preserved (deformed), as is its anterior part. The disc, within the preserved part, is subrectangular in outline, and possesses a distinct radial sulcus posteriorly of the growth axis. The sulcus is shallow and does not deform the concentric rugae. The concentric rugae are regular to subregular, symmetrical, with rounded edges. They are covered with sharpe-edged growth lines, which are evenly developed on the entire height of the disc.

    The juvenile fragment from Sheep River (fig. 5C) possesses a well-preserved posterior auricle, which is extended and well separated from the disc, along a well-developed auricular sulcus. The disc is covered with subregular concentric rugae, superimposed by raised sharp-edged growth lines that are typical of the species.

    The medium-sized incomplete specimen TMP 2016.041.0172 (fig. 5G), from Chungo Creek, demonstrates well the general outline of the species and type of ornament. The posterior part of its disc, with the posterior, radial sulcus, is deformed and partly missing.

  • Occurrence: The species (as herein interpreted) is known from the Wapiabi Formation from localities on Blackstone River, Wapiabi Creek, West Thistle Creek, Sheep River, and Chungo Creek. It occurs invariably in the topmost part of the lower Coniacian, disappearing below the entry of the first Volviceramus. The species, as herein understood, was first precisely located in the stratigraphic succession of the Staffhorst Mine section, in northern Germany (Walaszczyk and Wood in Niebuhr et al., 1999), where it occurs in an equivalent stratigraphic interval. Although the species was also reported from other regions (e.g., eastern part of European Russia; see, e.g., Nikitin, 1888; Glazunova, 1972), precisely located specimens have not been reported.

  • FIG. 4.

    Terminology and measurements of the external morphologic features of inoceramid shells as applied in this paper (partly after Harries et al., 1996).

    f04_53.jpg

    Inoceramus kleini Müller, 1888
    Figure 6

  • 1888. Inoceramus kleini, sp. nov. G. Müller: 415, pl. 18, fig. 1a–b.

  • ?pars 1911. Inoceramus kleini Müller. Andert: 48–50, pl. 2, fig. 6 [non pl. 1, fig. 7; pl. 2, figs. 3, 78].

  • non 1934. Inoceramus kleini Müller. Andert: 115–117, text-figs. 1012. pl. 4, figs. 910; pl. 5, figs. 12.

  • 1929. Inoceramus kleini Müller. Heine: 44–46, pl. 2, figs. 1011; pl. 3, figs. 1213.

  • 1969. Inoceramus kleini Müller. Radwanska: 709.

  • 1979. Inoceramus kleini Müller. Ivannikov: 62, pl. 14, fig. 4; pl. 15, figs. 12; pl. 16, fig. 1; pl. 17, fig. 1.

  • pars 1991. Inoceramus kleini Müller. Tarkowski: 109–110, pl. 13, fig. 7; pl. 14, fig. 2 [non pl. 14, fig. 3].

  • 1992. Inoceramus kleini Müller. Walaszczyk: 37; pl. 38, fig. 3.

  • 1992. Inoceramus kleini Müller. Cech and Svabenicka, pl. 2, fig. 2.

  • Type: By monotypy, the holotype is the specimen figured by Müller (1888, pl. 18, fig. 1a–b) from the Spiegelsberge, south of Halberstadt (Subhercynian Basin), Germany; from the middle Coniacian.

  • Material: Two specimens in total. Doublevalve TM P 2016.041.0407, from Bighorn Dam, and one uncataloged, juvenile fragment of a single valve from West Thistle Creek.

  • Measurements: See table 1.

  • Description: The double-valve specimen, TMP 2016.041.0407 (fig. 6A–C), is weakly deformed, almost complete, with posteroventral parts of valves missing. The specimen is equivalve, inequilateral, small sized, and prosocline, with the disc subtriangular in outline and moderately inflated. The posterior auricle is small, moderately well separated from the disc. The beak is pointed, curved anterodorsally. Anterior margin is slightly concave below the umbo, then slightly convex; with the anterior margin steep. The ornament is composed of regularly spaced, symmetrical rugae, with interspaces growing gradually ventralward. The edges of the rugae are sharp. The rugae weaken on the posterior auricle and on the anterior wall, but are still visible.

  • Remarks: The species is interpreted herein as the evolutionary precursor of Inoceramus undabundus Meek and Hayden. Early representatives of the latter species are similar in valve outline and type of ornament, however, the interspaces are much larger at equivalent axial length.

  • Occurrence: The species spans the lower to middle Coniacian boundary. Although we have only two specimens (one from the topmost lower Coniacian in West Thistle Creek; and the second from the basal middle Coniacian at Bighorn Dam), this stratigraphic occurrence corresponds well with its occurrence in other areas. The species is known from Germany, Poland, Russia, Romania, and the Czech Republic.

  • FIG. 5.

    A, B, Inoceramus ex gr. lamarcki Parkinson, 1819, sulcate form, TMP 2016.041.0097, Wapiabi Formation, Wapiabi Creek, 66.2 m: A, anterior view, B, left lateral view. C, Inoceramus gibbosus Schlüter, 1877, Wapiabi Formation, Sheep River, 76.0 m, right lateral view. D, Inoceramus gibbosus Schlüter, 1877, TMP 2016.041.0110, Wapiabi Formation, Blackstone River, 43.5 m, right lateral view. E, F, Inoceramus ex gr. lamarcki Parkinson, 1819, sulcate form, TMP 2016.041.0233, Wapiabi Formation, West Thistle Creek, 34.4 m: E, left lateral view, F, anterior view. G, Inoceramus gibbosus Schlüter, 1877, TMP 2016.041.0172, Wapiabi Formation, Chungo Creek, 42.0 m, right lateral view. All photographs are ×1.

    f05_53.jpg

    Inoceramus undabundus Meek and Hayden,
    1862

    Figure 7A–D

  • 1862. Inoceramus undabundus Meek and Hayden: 26.

  • 1876. Inoceramus undabundus Meek and Hayden. Meek: 60, pl. 3, fig. 2.

  • 1894. Inoceramus undabundus Meek and Hayden. Stanton: 84, pl. 16, figs. 12 [illustration and description after Meek, 1876].

  • 1898. Inoceramus undabundus Meek and Hayden. Logan: 455, pl. 105, figs. 12. [illustration and description after Meek, 1876]

  • ?1901. Inoceramus undabundus Meek and Hayden. Sturm: 92, pl. 10, fig. 4.

  • pars 1929. Inoceramus undabundus Meek and Hayden. Heine: 100, pl. 11, fig. 50; pl. 13, fig. 57 [non pl. 11, fig. 51; pl. 19, fig. 71, which are Volviceramus exogyroides Meek and Hayden]

  • pars 2006. Inoceramus undabundus Meek and Hayden, 1862. Walaszczyk and Cobban: 260; text-figs. 9.2, 9.4, 27.2, 28.2, 38.6 [only]

  • Type: The lectotype, designated by Walaszczyk and Cobban (2006: 260), is USNM 1909, which is the original of Meek (1876: pl. 3, fig. 2), from the Marias River Shale of Chippewa Point near Fort Benton, Choutea County, Montana.

  • Material: Seven specimens; TMP 2016.041.0402, TMP 2016.041.0403, TMP 2016.041.0426, TMP 2016.041.0427, TMP 2016.041.0434; all from the Bighorn Dam section; TMP 2016.041.0244 from West Thistle Creek; and TMP 2016.041.0196 from Chungo Creek.

  • Measurements: See table 1.

  • Description: The typical specimens of the species are TMP 2016.041.0426 (fig. 7A, D), TMP 2016.041.0427, TMP 2016.041.0434, and TMP 2016.041.0244. Based on these four specimens, the characteristic of the species is as follows. The shell is inequivalve, with LV larger and more inflated than the right valve (RV), with a general architecture typical for Volviceramus. Both valves grow obliquely, with δ angle ranging between 30° and 45°. The beaks in both valves pointed, only slightly coiled, not projecting above the hinge line. The oblique growth continues till ca. 10 cm in axial length, the obliquity is then markedly reduced. Both valves are ornamented with strong commarginal rugae, with distinct ventralward increase of interspaces. The details of the shell are not known; the rugae on internal molds are symmetrical to moderately asymmetrical, with leading edges steeper. The interspaces are distinctly wider than the rugae edges. The edges of the rugae are rounded.

    The smallest specimen, which comes from the basal middle Coniacian and apparently phylogenetically the oldest (2016.041.0402; fig. 7B, C), is only slightly inequivalve. It already possesses, however, the typical ornament. TMP 2016.041.0403 from Bighorn Dam and TMP 2016.041.0196 from Chungo Creek, are fragments of LVs.

  • Discussion: The material studied includes the first well-documented RVs of the species ever reported.

    Although in our material the species is represented by only seven specimens, they demonstrate the evolution of the species from a relatively small-sized, weakly inequivalve morphotype (fig. 7B, C), in the earliest middle Coniacian, to moderate size, markedly inequivalve more advanced morphotype stratigraphically higher (fig. 7A, D). The phylogenetically oldest, weakly inequivalve specimens closely resemble Inoceramus kleini, from which they differ in having more robust ornament. The phylogenetically more advanced specimens possess features typical for volviceramids; this is particularly well seen on the RVs, in which the beak moves ontogenetically from its marginal position gradually inward (fig. 7A), as a consequence of inequivalve growth of the valve. Based on its evolutionary interpretation, the species (as a successor of Inoceramus kleini) is left in the genus Inoceramus, in spite of its close morphological resemblance to Volviceramus.

    Walaszczyk and Cobban (2006) included into the synonymy of Inoceramus undabundus also Inoceramus stantoni (= I. acuteplicatus of Stanton, 1894) Sokolov, 1914. Based on the Canadian material, however, it seems that phylogenetic changes of both species differ. In contrast to I. undabundus, I. stantoni remained only slightly inequivalve and preserved its more subtle ornament. Consequently we keep both species separate here. Both I. undabundus and I. stantoni seem to originate from I. kleini.

  • Occurrence: Inoceramus undabundus is most abundant in the Bighorn Dam section, where it was found at levels 41.0, 60.0, and 73.0 m. The single specimen from West Thistle Creek is from 72.4 m, and the specimen from Chungo Creek is from 54.0 m. The species is known from the U.S. Western Interior and Gulf Coast of North America. It is convincingly documented from Poland (Sturm, 1901) and Germany (Heine, 1929).

  • FIG. 6.

    Inoceramus kleini Müller, 1888, double-valve specimen, TMP 2016.041.0407, Wapiabi Formation, Bighorn Dam, 47.0 m: A, posterior view, B, anterior view, C, right lateral, view; the specimen is ×1.

    f06_53.jpg

    Tethyoceramus (Sornay, 1980)

  • Type Species: Inoceramus (Tethyoceramus) basseae Sornay (1980: pl. 1, figs. 1, 4, 6; pl. 2, figs. 1–3) by original designation.

  • Diagnosis and Discussion on the Genus: See Walaszczyk and Wood (1998).

  • Tethyoceramus sp.
    Figure 8

  • Material: Six specimens in total. Single unnumbered specimen from Mill Creek, from 76.6 m; 4 specimens from Bighorn Dam: TMP 2016.041.0395 and TMP 2016.041.0391 from 8.5 m; TMP 2016.041.0398 from 10.5 m; and TMP 2016.041.0400 from 41.5 m. Single specimen from Highwood River, TMP 2016.041.0139.

  • Remarks: The genus is relatively rare in the studied material, similar to the equivalent succession of the U.S. Western Interior (Walaszczyk and Cobban, 2000). Most of the specimens are poorly preserved, incomplete single valves. Two left valves of specimen TMP 2016.041.0395 (fig. 8) resemble Tethyoceramus alpinus (Heinz) (the smaller specimen) and Tethyoceramus ernsti (Heinz) (the larger one). To the latter species may also be referred the huge specimen from Highwood River (TMP 2016.041.0139). TMP 2016.041.0400 (not illustrated) is referred herein to Tethyoceramus wandereri (Andert), based on its very slender form and strong inflation.

  • Occurrence: The genus is known from the mid lower Coniacian in Europe and in the American Western Interior (see Walaszczyk and Wood, 1998; Walaszczyk and Cobban, 2000), and is well represented in Madagascar, where it apparently starts at the topmost Turonian and ranges through most of the lower Coniacian (Sornay, 1980; Walaszczyk et al., 2004, 2014a).

  • Cremnoceramus Cox, 1969
    (non Cremnoceramus Heinz, 1932 (nomen nudum)

  • Type Species: By original designation, Inoceramus inconstans Woods, 1912, from the lower Coniacian (Cox, 1969: N315).

  • Cremnoceramus sp.
    Figures 9, 10

  • Material: Forty-one specimens in total. Seven specimens from Chungo Creek: TMP 2016.041.0176 though to TMP 2016.041.0180 from 33.5 m; TMP 2016.041.0175 from 34.5 m; and TMP 2016.041.0174 from 37 m. Two specimens from West Thistle Creek; TMP 2016.041.0239 and TMP 2016.041.0237, both from 28.5 m. Nine specimens from Blackstone River: TMP 2016.041.0102 from 6.5 m; TMP 2016.041.0103 from 13.6 m; TMP 2016.041.0132 from 20.5 m; TMP 2016.041.0133 from 38.2 m; TMP 2016.041.0134 from 39.4 m; and TMP 2016.041.0128 through to TMP 2016.041.0131, from 43.5 m. Four specimens from Wapiabi Creek: TMP 2016.041.0096 from 2.8 m; TMP 2016.041.0101 from 7.9 m; TMP 2016.041.0100 from 48.5 m; and TMP 2016.041.0089 from 54.7 m. Six specimens from Sullivan Creek: TMP 2016.041.0078 through to TMP 2016.041.0083, from the inconstans interval. Single, unnumbered specimen from Cutpick Creek. Eight specimens from Bighorn Dam: TMP 2016.041.0389 through to TMP 2016.041.0394 from 8.5 m; TMP 2016.041.0397 from 10.5 m; TMP 2016.041.0401 from 32.5 m; and TMP 2016.041.0396 from 34.0 m. Four specimens from Highwood River: TMP 2016.041.0141, TMP 2016.041.0142, TMP 2016.041.0143, and TMP 2016.041.0146.

  • Remarks: The taxonomy and evolutionary interpretation of the genus, as applied herein, follows Walaszczyk and Wood (1998) and Walaszczyk and Cobban (2000), with slight modification, as discussed below.

    The genus is well represented in the lowermost part of the Wapiabi Formation, up to surface CS4. The cremnoceramid assemblage is composed of Cremnoceramus deformis deformis (Meek, 1871), Cremnoceramus crassus crassus (Petrascheck, 1903), and Cremnoceramus crassus inconstans (Woods, 1912). This is the same assemblage as known from the southern part of the Western Interior Basin (see Walaszczyk and Cobban, 2000), and outside, in other areas of the Euramerican biogeographic region (e.g., Walaszczyk, 1992; Walaszczyk and Wood, 1998). The form that dominates the assemblage is C. deformis deformis (fig. 9A, D); less common is C. crassus crassus (fig. 9B). What is very interesting is the parallel occurrence of C. crassus crassus and typical forms of C. crassus inconstans (fig. 10). This may suggest that the change from C. crassus inconstans to C. crassus crassus was cladogenetic in character and both forms co-occurred subsequently. Consequently, both should be simply referred to as C. crassus and C. inconstans.

  • Occurrence: The genus is well represented in all localities studied herein spanning the lower Coniacian: Cutpick Creek, West Thistle Creek, Bighorn Dam, Chungo Creek, Ram River, Sheep River, Wapiabi Creek, Blackstone River, and Highwood River (fig. 1). The genus is known from the Euramerican biogeographic region (western Central Asia, Europe, and the Atlantic and gulf coasts of North America; North American Western Interior) (Tröger, 1981, 1989; Walaszczyk, 1992; Kauffman et al., 1993; Walaszczyk et al., 1998; Walaszczyk and Cobban, 1998, 2000; Wood et al., 2004); North Pacific Province (Japan, Sakhalin) (Noda, 1996), New Zealand (Crampton, 1996), South America (Brazil) (Kauffman and Bengtson, 1985).

  • FIG. 7.

    Inoceramus undabundus Meek and Hayden, 1862. A, TMP 2016.041.0426, Wapiabi Formation, Bighorn Dam, 73.0 m, lateral view of RV. B, C, TMP 2016.041.0402, Wapiabi Formation, Bighorn Dam, 41.0 m: B, lateral view, C, anterior view. D, TMP 2016.041.0427, Wapiabi Formation, Bighorn Dam, 73.0 m, anterodorsal view of LV. All photographs are ×1.

    f07_53.jpg

    Volviceramus Stoliczka, 1871

  • Type Species: Inoceramus involutus J. de C. Sowerby: 1828: 160, pl. 583, figs. 13, by original designation (Stoliczka, 1871: 394, 401).

  • Remarks: Woods (1912) regarded Volviceramus as a successor of the Inoceramus lamarcki Parkinson group. However, as rightly pointed out by Tsagarély (1942), both the valve outline (particularly the RV) and the ornament of Volviceramus are close to Cremnoceramus (Inoceramus inconstans in Tsagarély, 1942). The single RV of various species, as well as the juveniles LV of V. cardinalensis, sp. nov., or V. exogyroides can very easily be mistaken for Cremnoceramus. Both Volviceramus and Cremnoceramus also show similar morphological variability in juvenile obliquity of growth. In the case of Volviceramus this is well seen in LVs; this feature is difficult to evaluate in case of RVs.

    Through its distinct inequivalvness, the genus is very easily separated from other inoceramids. Some inequivalve representatives of the genus Inoceramus, as, e.g., Inoceramus inaequivalvis Schlüter, 1877, differ from Volviceramus in being distinctly less inequivalve (and they are never coiled) and in possessing more or less similar ornament on both valves.

    Volviceramids appear abuptly above CS4, which caps a prominent, sandier-upward heterolithic succession of the lower Coniacian. Already within the lowest middle Coniacian allomembers (CA5–6) the variability of the genus is remarkable. There appear: Volviceramus koeneni (Müller), V. exogyroides (Meek and Hayden), and V. cardinalensis, sp. nov. In addition to a single specimen, which shows a transitional character between V. exogyroides and V. involutus, the latter species was not noticed in this lowest interval; the first typical representatives of V. involutus are from allomember CA8.

    The intraspecific variability within Volviceramus is caused mainly by the variability in the juvenile obliquity in their LVs. This allows the distinction of two morphogroups within the clade. The first group comprises low-obliquity forms (with high juvenile δ angle), characterized by a coiled or uncoiled, slender general outline. The group is represented by: V. koeneni, V. involutus, and V. stotti, sp. nov. The second group comprises forms growing obliquely in the juvenile stage (low juvenile δ angle), changing the direction of growth, to a less oblique one, later in ontogeny. This leads to a similar final architecture of the valve as the one observed in strongly inflated cremnoceramids. The oblique juvenile growth causes marked increase in valve length, and combined with subsequent geniculation and change to distinctly lower obliquity, gives a broad morphotype with massive appearance. The group is represented by V. exogyroides and V. cardinalensis, sp. nov. (see figs. 1317). Whereas, however, the LVs in this second group resemble strongly geniculated valves in Cremnoceramus, their RVs are distinctly smaller, nongeniculated, with the typical Volviceramus RV geometry.

  • Occurrence: The documented range of Volviceramus is middle to upper Coniacian. The genus is known from the Euramerican biogeographic region (western Central Asia, Europe, Gulf of Mexico area, American Western Interior).

  • FIG. 8.

    Tethyoceramus sp., TMP 2016.041.0395 (two left valves), Wapiabi Formation, Bighorn Dam, 8.5 m: A, D, smaller specimen; A, lateral view; D, anterior view. B, C, larger specimen; B, anterior view, C, lateral view. All photographs are ×1.

    f08_53.jpg

    Volviceramus koeneni (Müller, 1888)
    Figure 11

  • 1888. Inoceramus (Volviceramus) Koeneni n.sp., Müller: 412, pl. 17, fig. 1.

  • 1891. Inoceramus paradoxus v. Haenlein. Langenhan and Grundey: 12, pl. 5, figs. 34.

  • 1891. Inoceramus varius v. Haenlein. Langenhan and Grundey: 12, pl. 5, figs. 1; ?pl. 5, fig. 2.

  • 1913. Inoceramus (Volviceramus)(aff.?) involutus Sowerby. Scupin: 213, pl. 12, fig. 3.

  • 1928. Inoceramus koeneni Müller. Heinz: 37, pl. 3, fig. 2.

  • 1929. Inoceramus koeneni Müller. Heine: 98, pl. 15, fig. 63; pl. 17, fig. 66; pl. 18, fig. 67.

  • 1932. Rhadinoceramus regalis, sp. nov., Heinz: 21.

  • non 1933. Cymatoceramus (Cymatoceramus) cf. koeneni Müller. Heinz: 253; pl. 19, fig. 3 [= Tethyoceramus basseae Sornay]

  • 1934. Inoceramus koeneni Müller. Andert: 132, text-figs. 16a–c; pl. 8, figs. 23.

  • ?1959. Inoceramus involutus Sowerby. Dobrov and Pavlova: 153; pl. 10, fig. 1.

  • ?1968. Inoceramus koeneni Müller. Kotsubinsky: 135; pl. 23, figs. 4, 5

  • 1969. Inoceramus koeneni G. Müller. Tröger: 68, pl. 1, figs. 16; pl. 2, figs. 15.

  • 1974. Inoceramus koeneni G. Müller. Tröger, pl. 5, figs. X4302, X4303, X4305, X4306.

  • 1991. Inoceramus (Volviceramus) koeneni Müller. Tröger and Christensen: 31, pl. 3, fig. 7; ?pl. 2, figs. 23.

  • 1994. Volviceramus koeneni (G. Müller, 1888). Tröger and Summesberger: 169, pl. 2, figs. 13.

  • non 1994. Inoceramus (Volviceramus) cf. koeneni Müller. Malchus et al.: 116, text-fig. 4a, pl. 1, fig. 7 [=Cordiceramus cordiforis]

  • ?non 1996. Inoceramus (Volviceramus) koeneni Müller, 1888. Noda: 566, fig. 10.

  • ?non 1998. Inoceramus (Volviceramus) koeneni Müller, 1887. Noda and Matsumoto: 459, pl. 13, fig. 3. [reillustrated specimen of Noda, 1996: fig. 10]

  • 2006. Volviceramus koeneni (Müller, 1888). Walaszczyk and Cobban: 282; text-fig. 24, 25.2–25.4, 29.2.

  • Type: The lectotype, by subsequent designation of Tröger (1969), is the original of Müller (1888: pl. 17, fig. 1) from the middle Coniacian of Lehofsberg, near Quedlinburg, Germany.

  • Material: Nine specimens in total. Single specimen, TMP 2016.041.0076, from Sullivan Creek. Eight specimens from Chungo Creek: complete, double-valve TMP 2016.041.0184; TMP 2016.041.0182, TMP 2016.041.0183 (2 specimens), and TMP 2016.041.0187, and TMP 2016.041.0189 (2 specimens). Single specimen (cf.) from Sheep River, TMP 2016.041.0333.

  • Measurements: See table 1.

  • Description: TMP 2016.041.084 (fig. 11) is a well-preserved double-valved specimen, almost complete (a small fragment of the anterior part of the LV is missing), slightly deformed; with much of its shell intact. LV is107 mm high; RV is 90 mm high. Both valves are slender (with b/h ration 0.56 and 063 in the RV and LV respectively), however, this is partly due to secondary deformation perpendicular to the commissure. The LV is more inflated than the RV; its h/b ratio being 0.54. The LV juvenile growth is slightly oblique, with δ angle c. 75°. At h = 60 mm, δ angle increases to 90°. Its beak is pointed and curved dorsally. The LV bears weak, poorly developed commarginal rugae. In the ventral part it is almost smooth. The RV is moderately inflated; its b/h ratio is 0.42. Its obliquity is almost constant, with δ approximating 90°. The anterior wall is steep, high, and slightly concave. The posterior auricle is well separated from the disc, with a distinct sulcus in the dorsal part. The beak is pointed, projecting above the hinge line. The disc is ornamented with well-developed commarignal rugae, superimposed by radial sulci in the axial part of the midadult stage (fig. 11D).

    TMP 2016.041.082, TMP 2016.041.087, and TMP 2016.041.0333 are juvenile fragments of the LVs, undeformed; TMP 2016.041.0333 is with fragments of shell intact. They are referred to the Müller's species based on their ornamented valve.

    The double valve specimen TMP 2016.041.0189 is complete, moderately large specimen (hmax of RV = 104 mm), strongly deformed. It is moderately inequivalve, with the LV almost smooth, and with strong, typically ornamented RV.

  • Remarks: V. koeneni is morphologically the closest to V. involutus. The differences are (see Tröger, 1969) that V. involutus exhibits: stronger inequivalvness, lack of undulation on the LV, and distinctly stronger inflation and coiling of LV. Transitional forms between both species occur. The stronger inflation of the RV in V. koeneni than in V. involutus, mentioned by Müller (1888), is difficult to evaluate; one would need two-valve specimens, which are extremely rare. Volviceramus koeneni is the oldest member of the Volviceramus clade.

    Cymatoceramus (Cymatoceramus) cf. koeneni Müller from Madagascar, illustrated by Heinz (p. 253; pl. 19, fig. 3), is Tethyoceramus basseae (Sornay) as shown by Sornay (1980). To Tethyoceramus also belongs, most probably, the specimen of Inoceramus (Volviceramus) koeneni as reported from Japan by Noda (1996: fig. 10; see also Noda and Matsumoto, 1998: pl. 13, fig. 3). The Japanese specimen shows a regular pattern of concentric rugae, typical for Tethyoceramus/Cremnoceramus.

  • Occurrence: Volviceramus koeneni spans the middle Coniacian. At the base of the middle Coniacian it forms a distinct interval zone, being followed by V. involutus (see also Müller, 1900; Stille, 1909; Heinz, 1928; Tröger, 1969). It is known from the Euramerican biogeographic region; neither the Madagascan report (Heinz, 1933) nor the Japanese one (Noda, 1996) can be confirmed.

  • FIG. 9.

    A, Cremnoceramus deformis deformis (Meek, 1871), RV, Wapiabi Formation, Cutpick Creek, 19 m, lateral view. B, Cremnoceramus crassus crassus (Petrascheck, 1903), LV, TMP 2016.041.0175, Wapiabi Formation, Chungo Creek, 34.5 m. C, Cremnoceramus sp., TMP 2016.041.0100, RV, Wapiabi Formation, Wapiabi Creek, 48.5 m. D, Cremnoceramus deformis deformis (Meek, 1871), TMP 2016.041.0392, RV, Wapiabi Formation, Bighorn Dam, 8.5 m. E, Cremnoceramus sp., TMP 2016.041.0089, LV, Wapiabi Formation, Wapiabi Creek, 54.7 m. All photographs are ×1.

    f09_53.jpg

    Volviceramus involutus Sowerby, 1828
    Figure 12

  • 1828. Inoceramus involutus J. de C. Sowerby: vol. vi: 160, pl. 583, figs. 13

  • 1846. Inoceramus involutus Sowerby. d'Orbigny, vol. iii: 520, pl. 413, figs. 13.

  • 1846. Inoceramus lamarcki d'Orbigny, vol. iii: 518, pl. 412.

  • 1850. Inoceramus involutus. Dixon: pl. 28, fig. 32.[= Volviceramus anglo-germanicus of Heinz, 1932; = Inoceramus involutus belovodiensis of Glasunova, 1972]

  • 1858. Inoceramus umbonatus Meek and Hayden: 50.

  • 1871. Inoceramus (Volviceramus) involutus Sowerby. Stoliczka: 394, 401

  • 1876. Inoceramus umbonatus Meek and Hayden. Meek: 44, pl. 3, fig. 1; pl. 4, fig. 12.

  • 1888. Inoceramus (Volvicerasmus) involutus Sowerby. Müller: pl. 16, figs. 3, 4,

  • 1901. Inoceramus involutus Sowerby. Sturm: pl. 9, fig. 4.

  • 1902. Inoceramus involutus Sowerby. Wollemann: pl. 1, fig. 4; pl. 2, figs. 7, 8

  • 1907. Inoceramus umbonatus Meek and Hayden. Veatch: pl. 10, fig. 2.

  • 1912. Inoceramus involutus Sowerby. Woods: 327, text-figs. 88–94.

  • 1932. Volviceramus anglo-germanicus Heinz: 22. [=Inoceramus involutus Sowerby; Dixon, 1850, pl. 28, fig. 32]

  • ?1959. Inoceramus involutus Sowerby. Dobrov and Pavlova: 153, pl. 10, fig. 1a, b.

  • 1972. Inoceramus involutus Sowerby subsp. belovodiensis Glazunova, subsp. nov., Glazunova: 63; pl. 8, fig. 1; pl. 12, figs. 1, 2; pl. 13, fig. 5.

  • 1974. Inoceramus involutus Sowerby. Kotsubinsky: 81, pl. 18.

  • 2006. Volviceramus involutus (J. de C. Sowerby, 1829). Walaszczyk and Cobban, text-figs. 9.3, 25.1, 26.1–26.3, 27.3–27.4, 28.3, 30.2.

  • Type: By subsequent designation of Woods (1912: 334) the lectotype is BM 43268, being the original of J. de C. Sowerby (1929: pl. 583, fig. 1) from the Upper Chalk, England; the locality is unknown.

  • Diagnosis: Moderately large for genus, strongly inequivalve; LV coiled, growing moderately obliquely, almost smooth; RV weakly to moderately inflated, ornamented with well-developed rugae.

  • Material: Twelve specimens in total. Three specimens from Sheep River: TMP 2016.041.0321, TMP 2016.041.0329 and TMP 2016.041.0335, from 143 m. Two specimens from West Thistle Creek: TMP 2016.041.0243 from 72.5 m, and TMP 2016.041.0240 from 100.3 m. Single specimen from Bighorn River, TMP 2016.041.0362 from 51.8 m. Single specimen from Chungo Creek, TMP 2016.041.0188 from 75.7 m. Single specimen from James River, TMP 2016.041.0160 from 80.0 m. Single, unnumbered specimen from Cutpick Creek. Three specimens from Bighorn Dam: TMP 2016.041.0418 from 65.5 m, TMP 2016.041.0423 from 67.5 m, and TMP 2016.041.0431 from 67.5 m.

  • Measurements: See table 1.

  • Description: The species is small to medium size for the genus; inequilateral, strongly inequivalve. LV is strongly coiled, up to 1.5 whorls, tightly coiled, in the studied specimens (TMP 2016.041.0243; fig. 12). The LVs grow uniformly at δ = 60°, with strong inflation. The anterior margin gives a more or less consequent plane, and forms a well-developed planispiral coiling. The whorl in cross section is rounded in the lateral, anterior, and posterior parts; the “aperture” is oval. The LV is almost smooth. Only in the juvenile part may irregular, low, rounded rugae occur. Irregular rugae also occur in some specimens in the adult stage, usually at the anterior margin. The RV, when isolated, does not have any characteristic feature that allows it to be identified as belonging to a particular species of Volviceramus.

  • Remarks: Volviceramus involutus is the only Volviceramus species with almost perfect coiling of the LV, as seen on the anterior wall of the valve, resembling Nautilus or some involute ammonites. The posterior, or lateral (which would be ventral in ammonoids), margin is certainly quite different. The species-level identification of the RV is at the moment impossible. Based on species, of which double-valved specimens are available, the variability of RVs is high, and more double-valved specimens of every species would be necessary to make a reliable assessment.

    The infraspecific variability concerns mainly the l/h ratio, which results in more slender or more robust forms. The type species (Sowerby, 1828: pl. 583, figs. 13; see also Woods, 1912: text-fig. 88) is one of the robust forms, with high l/h ratio, well above 0.8. The slender form is best represented by Dixon's specimen (1850: pl. 28, fig. 32; see also Woods, 1912, text-fig. 89), with l/h ration about 0.75. The slender form, with Dixon's specimen as its type, was referred by Heinz (1932: 22) to a new species, Volviceramus anglogermanicus. Subsequently, the same specimen was chosen as the type of the new subspecies Inoceramus involutus belovodiensis by Glazunova (1972: 63), with the same diagnosis and the same aim to separate the slender morphotype of Volviceramus involutus. Based on our material it is clear, however, that both morphotypes are extreme variants of the same type and are, consequently, regarded as infraspecific variants (see also Walaszczyk and Cobban, 2006).

    The American species Volviceramus umbonatus (Meek and Hayden, 1858) is a typical representative of V. involutus, and consequently is a synonym of Sowerby's species. Volviceramus exogyroides and I. undabundus, which have previously been considered as synonyms of V. involutus, are well defined, separate species (see discussion herein).

  • Occurrence: Volviceramus involutus first appears in the middle part of the middle Coniacian and ranges into the upper Coniacian. It is well represented in the entire Western Interior Basin. The species is widely known from Europe and western Central Asia. It does not range south into the Mediterranean Province, although it was reported from Gosau in Austria (Tröger and Summesberger, 1994). The reports from Madagascar (Heinz, 1933) and from the western North Pacific Province (Pergament, 1971) have not been confirmed.

  • FIG. 10.

    Cremnoceramus crassus inconstans (Woods, 1912), TMP 2016.041.0101, LV, Wapiabi Formation, Wapiabi Creek, 7.9 m, A, anterior view, B, oblique, posterodorsal view, C, lateral view of the juvenile stage. All photographs are ×1.

    f10_53.jpg

    FIG. 11.

    Volviceramus koeneni (Müller, 1888), TMP 2016.041.0184, double-valve specimen, Wapiabi Formation, Chungo Creek, 45.5 m, A, dorsal view, B, lateral view of the LV, C, anterior view, D, lateral view of the RV. All photographs are ×0.95.

    f11_53.jpg

    FIG. 12.

    Volviceramus involutus (Sowerby, 1828), TMP 2016.041.0243, LV, Wapiabi Formation, West Thistle Creek, 72.5 m, A, lateral view of the adult stage, B, anterior view, C, oblique, posterodorsal view, D, dorsal view, the photographs are ×1.

    f12_53.jpg

    FIG. 13.

    Volviceramus exogyroides (Meek and Hayden, 1862), TMP 2016.041.0415, LV, Wapiabi Formation, Bighorn Dam, interval 50–60 m, A, lateral view of the juvenile stage, B, lateral view of the adult stage, C, anterior view. All photographs are ×1.0.

    f13_53.jpg

    FIG. 14.

    Volviceramus exogyroides (Meek and Hayden, 1862), A, B, F, G, TMP 2016.041.0417, LV, Wapiabi Formation, Bighorn Dam, 65.5 m, A, dorsal view, B, lateral view, F, anterior view; G, apertural view. C–E, TMP 2016.041.0363, LV, Bighorn River, 51.8 m, C, anterior view, D, apertural view, E, dorsal view. All photographs are ×1.

    f14_53.jpg

    Volviceramus exogyroides (Meek and Hayden, 1862)
    Figures 1315

  • 1862. Inoceramus exogyroides Meek and Hayden: 26.

  • 1876. Inoceramus exogyroides Meek and Hayden. Meek: 46, pl. 5, fig. 3.

  • 1893. Inoceramus exogyroides Meek and Hayden. Stanton: 83, pl. 17, figs. 12 [reillustration of Meek, 1876: pl. 5, fig. 3, specimen]

  • 1898. Inoceramus exogyroides Meek and Hayden. Logan: 454, pl. 88, figs. 12 [reillustration of Meek, 1876: pl. 5, fig. 3, specimen].

  • 1907. Inoceramus exogyroides Meek and Hayden. Veatch: pl. 11, fig. 1.

  • pars 1929. Inoceramus undabundus Meek and Hayden. Heine: 100, pl. 11, fig. 51; pl. 19, fig. 71 [non pl. 11, fig. 50; pl. 13, fig. 57, which are Inoceramus undabundus Meek and Hayden].

  • 1972. Inoceramus obliquus, sp. nov., Glazunova: 63, pl. 8, figs. 2, 3.

  • 2006. Volviceramus exogyroides (Meek and Hayden, 1862). Walaszczyk and Cobban: 291; text-figs. 27.1, 28.1, 29.1, 30.1.

  • Type: The holotype, by monotypy, is the original of Meek (1876: pl. 5, fig. 3) from the Marias River Shale (Fort Benton Group), 20 miles below “Fort Benton,” on the upper Missouri River, in north-central Montana.

  • Material: Nineteen specimens. Ten specimens from Bighorn Dam: TMP 2016.041.0404 and TMP 2016.041.0405 from 47.5 m; TMP 2016.041.0414, TMP 2016.041.0415 and TMP 2016.041.0416, from an interval 50–60 m; TMP 2016.041.0417 from 65.6 m; TMP 2016.041.0433 from 67.5 m; TMP 2016.041.0420 from 72.0 m; TMP 2016.041.0441 from 75.4 m; and TMP 2016.041.0438 from 81.0 m. Single specimen from Sheep River, TMP 2016.041.0332 from 110.5 m. Single specimen from West Thistle Creek, TMP 2016.041.0234 from 53.2 m. Four specimens from Chungo Creek: TMP 2016.041.0193, and TMP 2016.041.0194, from 65.8 m; TMP 2016.041.0200 from 65.9 m; and one unnumbered specimen from 65.8 m. Three specimens from Bighorn River: TMP 2016.041.0363, TMP 2016.041.0364, from 51.8 m, and TMP 2016.041.0357, from 93.6 m.

  • Measurements: See table 1.

  • Description: The following description refers only to the LV; RVs are not represented in the studied material.

    The shell is of small to moderate size, inequilateral. Its outline changes during ontogeny following the change of growth direction; its juvenile outline is triangular, strongly oblique, elongated parallel to the ligament; its adult outline is trapezoidal, due to the change of growth, to distinctly less oblique. The specimens vary between well-geniculated ones (see fig. 13) to forms with a gradual change from the juvenile to adult stage (fig. 14A, B, F, G). The beak is pointed, anteriorly terminal. The umbo is variably coiled, prosogyrate. The change from the oblique juvenile stage to less oblique adult stage is sometimes quite abrupt, geniculated. The juvenile stage is oblique, with δ angle ranging between 30° and 40°; the adult stage growth at δ between 50° and 60°. The outline of the juvenile stage varies with variable inflation; the more inflated specimens have more coiled umbos and are more slender. Depending on the length of the juvenile stage, the adult stage is more or less subquadrate.

    The valve is ornamented with regular to subregular commarginal rugae, with regular, ventralward increase of interspaces. The rugae are round topped, symmetrical to slightly asymmetrical. The ornament becomes less distinct in the adult stage, or it disappears completely.

  • Discussion: Both the original material of Meek and Hayden (1862; also Meek, 1876) and the material recently described from the U.S. Western Interior by Walaszczyk and Cobban (2006) are represented exclusively by LVs. The only reports of the RV come from Europe. These are by Heine (1929) from northern Germany, who referred these forms to Inoceramus undabundus Meek and Hayden; and by Glazunova (1972), who described this species under the new name Inoceramus obliquus (actually, the name is the homonym of v. Haenlein's species). Describing the RV Glazunova (1972) states that the RV is distinctly smaller than the LV and its outline is L-elongated. The beak is pointed, not projecting above the ligament, the umbo is weakly inflated. The valve is more evenly inflated than the LV. The ligamental plate is concave, covered with shallow resilifers intercalated with relatively narrower interresilifers.

    Volviceramus exogyroides resembles closely Volviceramus cardinalensis, sp. nov. Both have a distinctly oblique juvenile stage and change to lower obliquity in the adult stage. The juvenile stage of V. cardinalensis, sp. nov., is, however, almost subrectangular, poorly inflated, and almost smooth.

    The species has often been placed in synonymy with Volviceramus involutus (or its American synonym, V. umbonatus). Both species differ, however, in their ontogenetic development and consequent morphological characteristics.

    The juvenile parts of LVs may easily be taken for a Cremnoceramus. The difference is clearly seen when the ligament plate is preserved, or when the specimen is preserved as with both valves. This may be the reason for reports of Cremnoceramus from the interval characterized otherwise by Volviceramus (see, e.g., Kauffman et al., 1993; Collom, 2001).

  • Occurrence: Volviceramus exogyroides is known widely in the North American Western Interior. It is also known from Europe, where it was described as Inoceramus obliquus by Glazunova (1972). The species was reported (although without illustration) from the southern and eastern margins of the East European craton (e.g., Aliev and Kharitonov, 1981; Aliev and Pavlova, 1983), but it was never illustrated.

  • FIG. 15.

    Volviceramus exogyroides (Meek and Hayden, 1862), TMP 2016.041.0198, Chungo Creek, 65.8 m; A, dorsal view, B, oblique lateral view. Both photographs are ×1.

    f15_53.jpg

    Volviceramus cardinalensis , sp. nov.
    Figures 16, 17

  • Type Specimens: The holotype is TMP 2016.041.0317, upper middle Coniacian of the Sheep River section; paratypes: 14 specimens from various localities (see Material).

  • Etymology: After Cardinal River, western Alberta, where one of the paratypes was collected.

  • Material: Fifteen specimens in total. Four specimens from Bighorn Dam: TMP 2016.041.0399, loose, but located approximately in the interval 50–60 m of the succession, TMP 2016.041.0413 from 43.0 m, TMP 2016.041.0406 from 47.5 m, and TMP 2016.041.0421 from 105.0 m. 10 specimens from Sheep River, from 144 m: TMP 2016.041.0310, TMP 2016.041.0314, TMP 2016.041.0315, TMP 2016.041.0316, TMP 2016.041.0317 (holotype), TMP 2016.041.0318, TMP 2016.041.0319, TMP 2016.041.0320, TMP 2016.041.0322, and TMP 2016.041.0323. Single, double-valved unnumbered specimen from Cardinal River, 96.8 m.

  • Diagnosis. Noncoiled Volviceramus with LV strongly oblique and weakly inflated in juvenile stage, growing almost orthoclinally, with strong inflation in adult stage. RV strongly inflated for genus, with regular, widely spaced rugae, and shallow radial sulcus on its disc.

  • Description. The species is strongly inequivalve, noncoiled Volviceramus, attaining large size, with strongly inflated LV up to 30 cm in maximum h length. The LV shows characteristic change in growth direction, leading to the development of the juvenile and adult stages, sometimes, with well-developed geniculation. The juvenile valve, up to 100 mm of axial length, growths obliquely, with δ angle ca. 45°, then, in the adult stage, it changes its growth to markedly less oblique. The juvenile stage is subrectangular in outline, and moderately to weakly inflated. The strong inflation characterizes the adult stage. The adult stage varies in the L/H ratio, ranging from L-elongated, subrectangular specimens to subquadrate ones. The RV is relatively large, with strongly inflated disc, distinctly oblique. The disc is separated from the posterior auricle, along a well-developed auricular sulcus.

    The juvenile stage of the LV is almost smooth; the adult stage is covered with subregular, widely spaced, low rugae. The RV is regularly, strongly rugate on the disc; the rugae do not continue over the posterior auricle. The rugae are distinctly narrower than interrugae spaces.

    The holotype, TMP 2016.041.0317 (figs. 16, 17), is a huge (estimated maximum h is 180 mm), double-valved specimen, apparently undeformed, with parts of shell in the ligament area preserved. The L of the juvenile stage (fig. 17B) of the LV is ca. 110 mm, and its H is ca. 60 mm. This part is weakly inflated, with juvenile b = 18 mm, smooth, growing moderately obliquely, at δ = 45°. The beak is strongly prosogyrous, curved anteriorly. The α angle is 105°. Although there is no distinct geniculation, at h = 120 mm the valve starts growing perpendicularly to the juvenile stage. The adult stage is subrectangular, longer than high (H is only 110 mm at L = 170 mm).

  • Remarks. Volviceramus cardinalensis, sp. nov., resembles V. exogyroides. It differs from the latter in its subrectangular juvenile outline, instead of suboval, and lower inflation. Moreover, the juvenile of V. exogyroides is usually regularly rugate, changing to almost smooth in adult stage. In contrary, V. cardinalensis is almost smooth in the juvenile stage, and changes its ornament to distinctly rugate in the adult.

  • Occurrence: The species seems to appear very low in the middle Coniacian and ranges to the lower upper Coniacian.

  • FIG. 16.

    Volviceramus cardinalensis, sp. nov., TMP 2016.041.0317, Wapiabi Formation, Sheep River, 144 m, A, dorsal view, B, anterior view of the LV. Both photographs are ×0.7.

    f16_53.jpg

    FIG. 17.

    Volviceramus cardinalensis, sp. nov. TMP 2016.041.0317, Wapiabi Formation, Sheep River, 144 m, A, lateral view of the LV; B, lateral view of the juvenile part of the LV. Both photographs are ×0.7.

    f17_53.jpg

    Volviceramus stotti, sp. nov.
    Figure 18

  • pars 2001. Volviceramus involutus (Sowerby, 1828). Collom: 475, pl. 15, figs. 1, 2, 4, 5. [only]

  • 2001. Volviceramus aff. koeneni [in text: Volviceramus koeneni] (Müller, 1888). Collom: 474, pl. 15, fig. 3.

  • Type Specimens: Holotype is TMP 96.19.13, double valved, moderately large; well preserved (original to Volviceramus involutus (Soweby) in Collom, 2001: pl. 15, figs. 4, 5); paratypes: TMP 2016.041.0439, and TMP 2016.041.0245; both internal molds of LVs, with fragments of shell preserved; moreover: GSC 117324, LV, an original to Volviceramus involutus (Soweby) in Collom 2001: pl. 15, fig. 1; TMP 96.53.1, LV, original to Volviceramus involutus (Soweby) in Collom 2001, pl. 15, fig. 2; and TMP 87.56.13, doublevalved specimen, original to Volviceramus aff. koeneni (Müller) in Collom 2001: pl. 15, fig. 3.

  • Type Locality: Bad Heart Formation, Kakut Creek (for details of location, see Collom, 2001).

  • Material: Our material consists of two specimens, both LVs: TMP 2016.041.0439 from Bighorn Dam, 91.5 m; TMP 2016.041.0245 from West Thistle Creek, 107.5 m. Two other specimens, TMP 2016.041.0313 and TMP 2016.041.0326, from Sheep River, are referred to herein as cf. stotti.

  • Diagnosis: Moderately inflated and moderately inequivalve Volviceramus, of moderate size, rounded, prosocline, with ornament, composed of raised growth lines, with superimposed, low, widely spaced, subregular concentric rugae.

  • Etymology: After Donald F. Stott, the preeminent Canadian geologist and researcher of the Cretaceous of the Canadian Western Interior.

  • Measurements: See table 1.

  • Description: This is a moderately inequivalve Volviceramus species, with both valves regularly inflated, strongly prosocline, straight. LV is larger and more inflated, growing dominantly posteroventrally. The beak is pointed, curved anterodorsally; it projects above the hinge line. The valve outline is parabolical. The anterior margin is relatively short (AM/h between 0.40 and 0.45). The anterior wall is steep to overhanging, rounded. The anteroventral margin is rounded, broadly convex; ventral margin is rounded. The posterior auricle is small, well separated from the disc, particularly in the RV; less so in the LV. The ligament is strong; the resilifers as observed on one of the specimens illustrated in Collom (2001: pl. 15, fig. 1) are narrow and rectangular, with narrow interresilifer plates.

    The ornament is composed of regular to subregular, round-edge rugae, superimposed by sharp-edged growth lines, well visible both on outer shell surface and on internal mold.

  • Remarks: The weak to moderate inequivalveness (the feature inferred from the characteristics of the ligamental plate), moderate to strong inflation of the LV, and a peculiar ornament, make this species different from any other Volviceramus species known. In general architecture V. stotti, sp. nov., resembles V. koeneni, however, the latter is distinctly inequivalve, with RV having a very distinct ornament, composed of sharpedged, strong concentric rugae, with variably developed radial ribs.

  • Occurrence: The species appears relatively high in the succession, close to the appearance level of Sphenoceramus subcardissoides, which marks the base of the upper Coniacian, and ranges to the top of CA16, in the middle part of the substage.

  • FIG. 18.

    Volviceramus stotti, sp. nov. A, B, D, TMP 2016.041.0439, LV, A, anterior view; B, dorsal view, D, lateral view. Wapiabi Formation; Bighorn Dam, 91.5 m; the specimen is ×0.85. C, E, TMP 2016.041.0245, LV, C, lateral view, E, posterodorsal view. Wapiabi Formation, West Thistle Creek, 107.5 m; the photograph is ×0.9.

    f18_53.jpg

    Volviceramus sp. A
    Figures 19, 20

  • Material: Two specimens in total, both internal molds of LVs. Single specimen from Sheep River, TMP 2016.041.0334, from 106.5 m; single specimen from Chungo Creek, TMP 2016.041.0195, from 56.9 m.

  • Measurements: See table 1.

  • Description: The valves are subrounded to suboval, weakly inequilateral, prosocline, moderately inflated. The beak is pointed, curved strongly dorsoanteriorly. The umbo is subtrigonal. The umbonal part grows obliquely (umbonal δ is between 35° and 40°); then the valve becomes straight, growing at d between 70° and 75°. The posterior auricle apparently does not develop, or is very small (and not preserved on our specimen). The anterior margin is relatively short (AM/h = 0.4); it is concave below the umbo, then straight. The ventral margin is broadly and regularly rounded, long. The posterior margin is not observed on our specimen; it apparently is very short.

    The umbonal part is moderately to strongly inflated. The adult stage then becomes weakly or only moderately inflated, and becomes again strongly inflated in the ventral part (?gerontic stage). The valves are almost smooth, or bear only weakly developed, widely spaced, very low rugae; growth lines are not observed.

  • Remarks: These two specimens resemble closely Volviceramus exogyroides and may easily be imagined as a morphotype of V. exogyroides, which very early in ontogeny changes its juvenile (very oblique) growth to the adult (almost straight). More material is needed to decide whether this morphotype is an extreme variant of V. exogyroides or it is an independent species.

  • Occurrence: This morphotype is known from only two specimens from our collection. Both are from the lower middle Coniacian (both are from CA7) of Sheep River and Chungo Creek.

  • Sphenoceramus J. Böhm, 1915

  • Type Species: Inoceramus cardissoides Goldfuss, 1835.

  • Generic Characters: The genus is obliquely wedge shaped in outline, weakly to moderately inflated, medium to large sized, equivalve and inequilateral. The disc is triangular in outline, with three growth axes (Schalenkante of Seitz: 1965, text-fig. 1), similar to the genus Cordiceramus, commonly with a more or less well-developed radial sulcus in the posterior part of the disc. The umbo is pointed, curved anteriorly, usually extending above the hinge line. The ornament is well developed over the disc, usually much weaker on the posterior auricle. Both concentric and radial ornament elements occur.

  • Occurrence: Sphenoceramus appeared in the late Coniacian (see Heinz, 1926, 1928; Heine, 1929; Seitz, 1962; Tröger and Christensen, 1991; Walaszczyk and Wood in Niebuhr et al., 1999), and ranged up to the mid early Campanian (Seitz, 1965). It is a Boreal species, rarely reported in the Mediterranean area (see, e.g., Tröger and Summesberger, 1994). The genus seems to be limited to the Northern Hemisphere; reports from the Southern Hemisphere (Heinz, 1929; Kauffman in Kennedy et al., 1973) are not confirmed (see discussion in Walaszczyk and Cobban, 2006; Kennedy et al., 2008; Walaszczyk et al., 2014a). The genus is widely reported from the North Pacific Province, particularly from its western parts. How abundant the genus was in this province is, however, unclear. Of a wide variety of morphotypes referred to Sphenoceramus (e.g., Matsumoto et al., 1982; Toshimitsu, 1988; Noda, 1988), most should be referred to other genera (e.g., Glazunov, 1976; Zonova, 1992, 1993).

    In the Western Interior Basin Sphenoceramus occurs regularly only in its northern part; probably ranging south to Montana. Further south the genus appears sporadically.

  • FIG. 19.

    Volviceramus sp. A, TMP 2016.041.0195, LV, Wapiabi Formation, Chungo Creek, 56.9 m, A, dorsal view, B, lateral view, C, anterior view. All photographs are ×1.

    f19_53.jpg

    FIG. 20.

    Volviceramus sp. A, TMP 2016.041.0334, Wapiabi Formation, Sheep River, 106.5 m, A, dorsal view, B, lateral view, C, anterior view. All photographs are ×1.

    f20_53.jpg

    FIG. 21.

    Sphenoceramus subcardissoides (Schlüter, 1877), Wapiabi Formation, TMP 2016.041.0001, Ram River, 132 m, lateral view. The photograph is ×1.

    f21_53.jpg

    Sphenoceramus subcardissoides (Schlüter, 1877)
    Figure 21

  • 1877. Inoceramus subcardissoides Schlüter: 271, pl. 37

  • 1905. Inoceramus subcardissoides Schlüter. Wegner: 169

  • 1926. Inoceramus subcardissoides Schlüter. Heinz: 101

  • 1932. Inoceramus subcardissoides Schlüter. Heinz: 24.

  • 1953. Inoceramus subcardissoides Schlüter. Odum: 12

  • 1956. Inoceramus ex gr. subcardissoides Schlüter. Soukup: pl. 13, figs. 13.

  • 1958. Inoceramus subcardissoides Schlüter. Kotsubinsky: 16, pl. 5, fig. 24.

  • 1968. Inoceramus subcardissoides Schlüter. Kotsubinsky: 137, pl. 24, fig. 3.

  • non 1969. Inoceramus subcardissoides soukupi Mitura in Mitura et al.: 175, pl. 2, fig. 1

  • 1974. Inoceramus cf. subcardissoides Schlüter. Tröger: pl. 6, figs. X4307, 4308

  • 1991. Inoceramus subcardissoides Schlüter. Tröger and Christensen: 32, pl. 2, fig. 4.

  • pars 2001. Euryceramus cardissoides (Goldfuss). Collom: 489, pl. 13, fig. 5; pl. 14, figs. 12 [non pl. 13, fig. 6]

  • Lectotype: The original to Schlüter (1877: pl. 37), from the Emchermergel of the rock-waste deposit of the Carnap I Mine Shaft near Horst in Westphalia, northern Germany.

  • Material: Seven specimens in total. Two fragments, TMP 2016.041.0443 from 92.5 m and TMP 2016.041.0444 from 92.0 m from Bighorn Dam. One fragmentary specimen, TMP 2016.041.0235 from 100.3 m in West Thistle Creek. Incomplete huge specimen TMP 2016.041.0201 from 96.5 m in Chungo Creek. One large incomplete specimen (internal and outer mold of the same), TMP 2016.041.0001, and TMP 2016.041.0002, from 132 m of Ram River. Incomplete fragment, TMP 2016.041.0338 from Sheep River.

  • Description: The best preserved is TMP 2016.041.0001 (fig. 21), the large fragmentary specimen from the Ram River section (and TMP 2016.041.0002, its outer mold). It is the medium stage part of the RV, with h =190 mm. Its juvenile and the anterior parts are missing. Also, it is slightly deformed in the preserved anterior part. The disc is wide, moderately inflated, apparently triangular in outline, covered with widely spaced, round-topped rugae and strong radial ribs. The latter weaken when crossing concentric rugae to form weakly developed nodes. The specimen retained a well-preserved radial sulcus, which is relatively broad and deep in the posterior part of the disc. The posterior auricle is not preserved. The radial ornament disappears from the radial sulcus, and reappears on the disc, posterior to the sulcus.

    TMP 2016.041.0235, from Thistle Creek, represents a much younger stage of the LV. It shows well, however, the tripartite disc and, although weak, clearly developed radial ribs.

    TMP 2016.041.0444, from Bighorn Dam, is a juvenile stage, 75 mm h long fragment. The specimen does not have radial ornament yet, which appears later in ontogeny. The outline and structure of the disc fits the characteristics of the species.

  • Discussion: Although incomplete, our specimens show well the characteristics of Schlüter's species: the presence of the strong, broad radial sulcus in the posterior part of the disc and the radial ornament, which crosses the concentric rugae, forming more or less well-developed nodes at crossings.

    The best reported specimens, besides the illustrated type, are the ones photographed by Collom (2001: pl. 13, fig. 5; pl. 14), from the upper Coniacian of the Smoky River area. His specimen from the Puskwaskau Formation (Collom, 2001: pl. 13, fig. 6) has different ornament and character of the posterior auricle, and is a different species.

  • Occurrence: Sphenoceramus subcardissoides first appears apparently at the base of the upper Coniacian (Tröger, 1989; Tröger and Christensen, 1991; Walaszczyk and Wood in Niebuhr et al., 1999). Heinz (1926) and Kotsubinsky (1958, 1968) reported the species from the upper Coniacian (upper Involutus Schichten in Heinz, 1926). Although quoted sometimes as ranging into the Santonian; no definite occurrence from this level can be confirmed. Consequently, it may be regarded as of late Coniacian age. In the studied area the species is common at the base of its range; its record higher in the succession is poorly known.

  • Sphenoceramus ex gr. pachti
    (Arkhangelsky, 1912)
    Figures 22, 23

  • 2006. Sphenoceramus ex gr. pachti (Arkhangelsky, 1912). Walaszczyk and Cobban: textfigs. 48.7, 48.10, 48.11.

  • Material: Three specimens from Cripple Creek: TMP 2016.041.0152, TMP 2016.041.0153, and TMP 2016.041.0154. Twenty-six specimens from West Thistle Creek; TMP 2016.041.0246-TMP 2016.041.0271. Two specimens from Bighorn Dam, TMP 2016.041.0424 and TMP 2016.041.0430. Numerous uncataloged specimens from Cardinal River.

  • Description: The species is small to medium size for the genus, inequilateral, apparently equivalve (?semiequivalve). The valve is weakly to moderately inflated, unless geniculated, quite oblique, with d between 45° and 50°. The valve outline is trapezoidal. The disc is trigonal in outline. The posterior auricle is usually well developed and well separated from the disc. The distinct auricular sulcus is visible in some specimens. The very distinct radial sulcus runs posteriorly of the growth axis. It starts at ca. 10 mm from the beak and becomes stronger with age. The beak is pointed, curved anterodorsally, projects slightly above the hinge line. The anterior margin is relatively short, usually slightly above 50% of the growth axis length, quite steep, may be slightly concave just below the umbo. The anterior margin passes into the long, broadly convex anteroventral margin. The ventral margin is narrowly rounded. The posterior margin is straight, almost parallel to the growth axis, being about 60% of the growth-axis length. The growth axis is straight in the juvenile and early adult part, then curves posteriorly. The ligament (dorsal) margin straight, relatively short, below 50% of the respective growth-axis length.

    The general outline and shape changes in geniculated specimens. The geniculation appears usually at between 30 and 40 mm axial distance from the beak. The geniculation angle varies but is approximately 60°. Rarely, double geniculation is observed. The geniculated forms are character- ized by a steep (sometimes overhanging) anterior wall, and sharp anterior margin (fig. 22J).

    The ornament is composed exclusively of commarginal rugae; very fine, discontinuous radial elements appear on some specimens (TMP 2016.041.0152, fig. 23D). Up to 20 mm of the axial length the rugae are poorly developed, and the ornament is composed almost entirely of raised, sharp-edged growth lines. In some specimens the rugae appear, however, much earlier, and the growth lines are poorly visible. In most of the specimens the rugae show a distinct stepwise change from rather closely spaced, roundtopped ones, to widely spaced ones, with distinctly sharper edges. In the geniculated specimens, the change is associated with the change of growth plane. The growth lines become less and less regular with age. The rugae do not pass onto the posterior auricle. In the geniculated specimens they pass onto the anterior wall.

  • Remarks: The studied material looks at first very variable. To a large extent this is, however, because of the genicution; the geniculation causes changes in the character of the anterior margin and wall, and in the general shape of the whole specimens. Other than that, the specimens are quite stable with respect to general outline and ornament.

    The general outline, ornament and ontogenetic changes make our specimens clearly representative of Sphenoceramus pachti. The difference between the Arkhangelsky's types and the studied material is the lack of radial ornament. In this respect, our specimens correspond to S. pachti subsp. indet. as described by Seitz (1965: pl. 9, figs. ?1, 34). Seitz suggested the possibility that his undescribed variety could represent juveniles of otherwise typical (i.e., radially ornamented) S. pachti. Although this is also possible in the case of our material, no radially ribbed specimen of S. pachti has ever been reported from the Western Interior Basin, and our material also seems to include adult specimens. Consequently, our specimens are regarded as representing a sample of a nonradially ribbed natural population.

    The geniculated, and particularly the smallsized specimens of S. pachti described herein very closely resemble the type of I. pontoni McLearn (1926: pl. 20, fig. 1). The only differences that may be indicated, based on the limited material of McLearn's species, are: (1) weakening of the posterior radial sulcus and (2) general weakening of the ornament in the adult stages of I. pontoni (this is not the case in S. pachti). The typical specimens of McLearn's species, collected from the Smoky River area, western-central Alberta, and from the Kevin section, northern Montana, come from beds slightly younger than S. pachti. Consequently, it is suggested herein that I. pontoni may represent an evolutionary descendant of S. ex gr. pachti.

  • Occurrence: The material studied is from the lower Santonian of Alberta, Canada. Very similar specimens occur higher in the lower and middle? Santonian.

  • FIG. 22.

    Sphenoceramus ex gr. pachti (Arkhangelsky, 1912), Wapiabi Formation, West Thistle Creek, basal Santonian. A, D, F, TMP 2016.041.0248, LV, 125 m; A, anterior view, D, lateral view, F, posterior view. B, TMP 2016.041.0246, LV, lateral view. C, J, TMP 2016.041.0256, RV, 127.5 m, C, lateral view, J, anterior view. E, TMP 2016.041.0269, RV, 126.5 m, lateral view. G, TMP 2016.041.0270, RV, 126.5 m, lateral view. H, I, TMP 2016.041.0268, LV, 126.5 m, H, lateral view, I, anterior view. All photographs are ×1.

    f22_53.jpg

    FIG. 23.

    Sphenoceramus ex gr. pachti (Arkhangelsky, 1912). Wapiabi Formation, basal Santonian. A, C, TMP 2016.041.0254, LV (geniculated), West Thistle Creek, 129.5 m, A, lateral view, C, anterior view. B, E, TMP 2016.041.0247, LV (geniculated), West Thistle Creek, 123 m, B, anterior view, E, lateral view. D, G, TMP 2016.041.0152, LV, Cripple Creek, 47.5 m, D, lateral view, G, oblique, dorsoposterior view. F, TMP 2016.041.0265, LV, West Thistle Creek, 125.3 m, lateral view. All photographs are ×1.

    f23_53.jpg

    Sphenoceramus ex gr. cardissoides
    (Goldfuss, 1835)
    Figure 24

  • 1965. Inoceramus cardissoides subsp. indet. Seitz: 47, pl. 4, figs. 14.

  • 2006. Sphenoceramus ex gr. cardissoides (Goldfuss, 1835). Walaszczyk and Cobban: textfigs. 48.3–48.6.

  • Material: Single RV, RTM 2016.041.0272, from 126 m level of West Thistle Creek.

  • Description: The studied specimen (fig. 24) is the small-sized internal mold of the RV; its hmax = 48.5. The valve is strongly inflated as for S. cardissoides; its b/h= 0.45. The disc is subquadrate in outline, prosogyrate. The beak is pointed, curved anterodorsally, projecting above the hinge line. Its anterior margin is distinctly concave, relatively long, with AM/h = 0.65, which is distinctly higher than in S. ex gr. pachti (ca. 0.5 or less). The anterior wall is steep to overhanging. The ventral margin is rounded. The radial sulcus is well developed. The posterior auricle is not preserved.

    The valve is ornamented with strong commarginal rugae, sharp-edged, with flat, and relatively large interspaces. The rugae are superimposed by raised, sharp-edged growth lines. Traces of weak radial ribs are visible in the axial part of the valve.

  • Remarks: The specimen clearly belongs to the Sphenoceramus pachti-cardissoides group. Its relatively long anterior margin is a characteristic of S. cardissoides. The lack of radial ornament makes it close to forms referred by Seitz (1965: 47) to Inoceramus cardissoides subsp. indet. Similarly, as with nonradially ribbed variety of S. pachti, Seitz did not name this variety, suggesting that it might comprise only the juvenile stages of other, radially ribbed species. The presence of this morphotype in the U.S. Western Interior suggests that the variety may represent a separate taxon.

  • Occurrence: The studied specimen comes from the lower Santonian of the West Thistle Creek section; the US Western Interior specimens come from the Santonian. The morphotype is also known from the lower and middle Santonian of Germany (Seitz, 1965).

  • FIG. 24.

    Sphenoceramus ex gr. cardissoides (Goldfuss, 1835), TMP 2016.041.0272, RV, Wapiabi Formation, West Thistle Creek, 125.3 m, A, lateral view, B, posterior view, C, anterior view. The photograph is ×1.

    f24_53.jpg

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

    The fossil material described here was collected during fieldwork between 2012 and 2014, with field assistance provided by O. Al-Mufti, P. Angiel, R. Buckley, S. CoDyer, M. Grifi, E. Hooper, S. Morrow, K. Pavan, T. Plint, and K. Vannelli. Funding for A.G.P.'s regional stratigraphic studies was provided by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada over numerous grant cycles. Supplementary funding was provided by Canadian Hunter Ltd, Home Oil Ltd., Imperial Oil Ltd., Texaco Ltd., and Unocal Canada, Ltd. Funding for I.W., for final studies in Denver in November 2016, is from NCN Grant UMO-2015/17/B/ ST10/03228. The remarks by journal reviewers, Gregori López, Barcelona, and an anonymous one, are warmly acknowledged.

    REFERENCES

    1.

    Aliev, M.M., and V.M. Kharitonov. 1981. Stratigraphic distribution of Inoceramus in the Upper Cretaceous deposits of Azerbaijan. Izvestia Akademii Nauk Azerbaijanskoy SSR, Seria Nauk o Zemlie (1981) 2: 3–13. Google Scholar

    2.

    Aliev, M.M., and M.M. Pavlova. 1983. Stratigraphic and paleoecologic peculiarities of inoceramides of the Upper Cretaceous of the south of the USSR. Izvestia Akademii Nauk Azerbaijanskoy SSR, Seria Nauk o Zemlie (1983) 4: 97–102. Google Scholar

    3.

    Andert, H. 1911. Die Inoceramen des Kreibitz-Zittauer Sandsteingebirges. Festschrift des Humboldtvereins zur Feier seines 50 jährigen Bestehens: 33–64. Leipzig: M. Weg. Google Scholar

    4.

    Andert, H. 1934. Die Kreideablagerungen zwischen Elbe und Jeschken. Teil 3: Die Fauna der obersten Kreide in Sachsen, Böhmen und Schlesien. Abhandlungen der Preußischen Geologischen Landesanstalt, Neue Folge 159: 1–447. Google Scholar

    5.

    Arkhangelsky, A.D. 1912. Upper Cretaceous deposits of the eastern part of the European Russia. Reprinted in Akademik A.D. Arkhangelsky, Izobrannye Trudy, vol. 1: 133–466. Moskva: Izdatelstvo Akademii Nauk SSSR. [In Russian] Google Scholar

    6.

    Assmus, G. 1963. Stratigraphie und Petrographie des Coniac im östlichen Teil der Halberstädter Mulde. Diplomarbeit of the Freiberg Technical University, Germany. Google Scholar

    7.

    Böhm, J. 1915. Vorlage von Inoceramen aus dem subhercynen Emscher und Untersenon. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft 67: 181–183. Google Scholar

    8.

    Bodylevski, W.I. 1958. Upper Cretaceous fauna from the lower reaches of the River Enisei. In Bodylevski, W.I. and N.I. Shulgina, Jurassic and Cretaceous faunas from the lower reaches of the Enisei. Trudy Vsesoiuznovo Nauchnoissledovatel'skogo Instituta Geologii Arktiki 93: 69–86. [In Russian] Google Scholar

    9.

    Cech, S., and L. Svabenicka. 1992. Macrofossils and nannofossils of the type locality of the Brezno Formation (Turonian-Coniacian, Bohemia). Vĕstnik Českého Geologického Ústavu 67: 311–326. Google Scholar

    10.

    Cobban, W.A. 1951. Scaphitoid cephalopods of the Colorado Group. United States Geological Survey, Professional Paper 239: 1–42. Google Scholar

    11.

    Cobban, W.A., T.S. Dyman, and K.W. Porter. 2005. Paleontology and stratigraphy of upper Coniacian-middle Santonian ammonite zones and application to erosion surfaces and marine transgressive strata in Montana and Alberta. Cretaceous Research 26: 429–449. Google Scholar

    12.

    Cobban, W.A., I. Walaszczyk, J.D. Obradovich, and K.C. McKinney. 2006. A USGS zonal table for the Upper Cretaceous middle Cenomanian-Maastrichtian of the Western Interior of the United States based on ammonites, inoceramids, and radiometric ages. United States Geological Survey, Open-File Report 2006–1250: 1–46. Google Scholar

    13.

    Collom, C.J. 2001. Systematic paleontology, biostratigraphy, and paleoenvironmental analysis of the Wapiabi Formation (Upper Cretaceous), Alberta and British Columbia,Western Canada. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Calgary, Alberta: 834 pp. Google Scholar

    14.

    Cox, R.R. 1969. Family Inoceramidae Giebel, 1852. 314–321. In Moore, R.C. (editor), Treatise on invertebrate paleontology. Part N. Mollusca 6 (1), Bivalvia. 489 pp. Boulder: Geological Society of America and Kansas University Press. Google Scholar

    15.

    Crampton, J.S. 1996. Inoceramid bivalves from the Late Cretaceous of New Zealand. Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences, Monograph 14: 1–188. Google Scholar

    16.

    Dobrov, S. A. and M.M. Pavlova. 1959. Inoceramids. In M.M. Moskvin (editor), Atlas of the Upper Cretaceous fauna of northern Caucasus and Crimea: 130–165 Moscow: Gostoptechizdat. [in Russian] Google Scholar

    17.

    Glazunova, A.E. 1972. Paleontological bases of the stratigraphical subdivision of the Cretaceous deposits of Povolzhe. Upper Cretaceous. Moscow: Nedra, 202 pp. [in Russian] Google Scholar

    18.

    Glazunov, V.S. 1967. Systematics of Late Cretaceous Inoceramids of Sakhalin. Paleontological Journal (1967) 1: 35–44. Google Scholar

    19.

    Goldfuss, A. 1835. Petrefacta Germaniae tam ea, quae in museo Universitatis Regiae Borussicae Fridericiae Wilhelmiae Rhenanae servantur quam alia quaecunque in Museis Hoeninghusiano, Muensteriano aliisque extant, iconibus et descriptionibus illustrata [1833–41], vol. 2: 69–140. Düsseldorf: Arnz and Co. Google Scholar

    20.

    Harries, P. J., E.G. Kauffman, and J.S. Crampton (redactors). 1996. Lower Turonian Euramerican Inoceramidae: a morphologic, taxonomic, and biostratigraphic overview. A report from the first workshop on Early Turonian inoceramids (Oct. 5–8, 1992) in Hamburg, Germany; organized by Heinz Hilbrecht and Peter Harries. Mitteilungen aus dem Geologisch-Paläontologischen Institut der Universitat Hamburg 77: 641–671. Google Scholar

    21.

    Heine, F. 1929. Die Inoceramen des mittelwestfälischen Emschers und unteren Untersenons. Abhandlungen der Preußischen Geologischen Landesanstalt, Neue Folge 120: 1–124. Google Scholar

    22.

    Heinz, R. 1926. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Stratigraphie und Tektonik der oberen Kreide Lüneburgs. Mitteilungen aus dem Mineralogisch-Geologischen Staatsinstitut, Hamburg 8: 3–109. Google Scholar

    23.

    Heinz, R. 1928. Das Inoceramen-Profil der Oberen Kreide Lüneburgs. Mit Anführung der neuen Formen und deren Kennzeichnung. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der oberkretazischen Inoceramen I. Jahresbericht des Niedersächsischen geologischen Vereins zu Hannover 21: 64–81. Google Scholar

    24.

    Heinz, R. 1929. Ueber Kreide-Inoceramen der Südafrikanischen Union (Beiträge zur Kenntnis der ober kretazischen Inoceramen 11). Compte Rendu, XV International Geological Congress, South Africa, vol. 2: 681–687. Google Scholar

    25.

    Heinz, R. 1932. Aus der neuen Systematik der Inoceramen. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der oberkretazischen Inoceramen 14. Mitteilungen aus dem Mineralogisch- Geologischen Staatsinstitut, Hamburg 13: 1–26. Google Scholar

    26.

    Heinz, R. 1933. Inoceramen von Madagascar und ihre Bedeutung für Kreide-Stratigraphie. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der oberkretazischen Inoceramen 12. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft 85: 241–259. Google Scholar

    27.

    Ivannikov, A.V. 1979. Inoceramids of the Upper Cretaceous in southwestern part of the East European Platform. Kiev: Akademia Nauk Ukrainskoy SSR, Institut Geologitcheskich Nauk, 102 pp. [in Russian] Google Scholar

    28.

    Jarvis, I., A.S. Gale, H.C. Jenkyns, and M.A. Pearce. 2006. Secular variation in Late Cretaceous carbon isotope: a new d13C carbon reference curve for the Cenomanian-Campanian (99.6–70.6 Ma). Geological Magazine 143: 561–608. Google Scholar

    29.

    Kauffman, E.G. 1973. Cretaceous Bivalvia. In A. Hallam (editor) Atlas of palaeobiogeography: 353–383. Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company. Google Scholar

    30.

    Kauffman, E.G. 1977. Illustrated guide to biostratigraphically important Cretaceous macrofossils, Western Interior Basin, USA. Mountain Geologist 14: 225–274. Google Scholar

    31.

    Kauffman, E.G., and P. Bengtson. 1985. Mid-Cretaceous inoceramids from Sergipe, Brazil: a progress report. Cretaceous Research 6: 311–315. Google Scholar

    32.

    Kauffman, E.G., et al. 1993. Molluscan biostratigraphy of the Cretaceous Western Interior Basin, North America. In W.G.E. Caldwell and E.G. Kauffman (editors), Evolution of the Western Interior Basin. Geological Association of Canada, Special Paper 39: 397–434. Google Scholar

    33.

    Kauffman, E.G. (compiler), W.J. Kennedy, and C.J. Wood. 1996. The Coniacian stage and substage boundaries. Bulletin de l'Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Sciences de la Terre 66 supp.: 81–94. Google Scholar

    34.

    Kennedy, W.J. and W.A. Cobban. 1991. Coniacian ammonite faunas from the United States Western Interior: Special Papers in Palaeontology 45: 96 pp. Google Scholar

    35.

    Kennedy, W.J., E.G. Kauffman, and H.C. Klinger. 1973. Upper Cretaceous invertebrate faunas from Durban, South Africa. Transactions of the Geological Society of South Africa 76: 95–111. Google Scholar

    36.

    Kennedy, W.J., I. Walaszczyk, and H.C. Klinger. 2008. Cladoceramus (Bivalvia, Inoceramidae)-ammonite associations from the Santonian of KwaZulu. South Africa. Cretaceous Research 29: 267–293. Google Scholar

    37.

    Khalafova, R.A. 1969. Fauna and stratigraphy of the Upper Cretaceous deposits of the SE part of the Small Caucasus and Nachitchewan area of ASSR. Erevan: ASS Academy of Sciences: 330 pp. [in Russian] Google Scholar

    38.

    Kotsubinsky, S.P. 1958. Inoceramids of the Cretaceous deposits of the Volhynian-Podolian Plate, 49 pp. Akademia Nauk Ukrainskoy SSR; Kiev. [in Ukrainian] Google Scholar

    39.

    Kotsubinsky, S.P. 1968. Inoceramidae. In S.I. Pasternak et al., Fauna of the Cretaceous deposits of the Western Ukraine: 115–148. Kiev: Naukova Dumka. [in Ukrainian] Google Scholar

    40.

    Kotsubinsky, S.P. 1974. Inoceramus. In G.J. Krymgoltz (editor), Atlas of the Upper Cretaceous Fauna of Donbass: 76–86. Moscow: Nedra. [in Russian] Google Scholar

    41.

    Lamolda, M.A., C.R.C. Paul, D. Peryt, and J.M. Pons. 2014. The Global Boundary Stratotype and Section Point (GSSP) for the base of the Santonian Stage, “Cantera de Margas,” Olazagutia, northern Spain. Episodes 37: 2–13. Google Scholar

    42.

    Langenhan, U., and M. Grundey. 1891. Das Kieslingswalder Gestein und seine Versteinerungen. Jahresbericht des Glatzer Gebirgs-Vereins 10: 3–12. Google Scholar

    43.

    Logan, W.N. 1898. The invertebrates of the Benton, Niobrara and Fort Pierre groups. University Geological Survey of Kansas 4 (Paleontology) (Upper Cretaceous 8): 431–518. Google Scholar

    44.

    Malchus, N., A.V. Dhondt, and K.-A. Tröger. 1994. Upper Cretaceous bivalves from the Glauconie de Lonzee near Gembloux (SWE Belgium). Bulletin de l'Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Science de la Terre 64: 109–149. Google Scholar

    45.

    Marcinowski, R., I. Walaszczyk, and D. Olszewska--Nejbert. 1996. Stratigraphy and regional development of the mid-Cretaceous (Upper Albian through Coniacian) of the Mangyshlak Mountains, Western Kazakhstan. Acta Geologica Polonica 46: 1–60. Google Scholar

    46.

    Matsumoto, T., M. Noda, and T. Kozai. 1982. Upper Cretaceous inoceramids from the Monobe Area, Shikoku. In Multidisciplinary research in the upper Cretaceous of the Monobe area, Shikoku. Special Papers of the Palaeontological Society of Japan 25: 53–68. Google Scholar

    47.

    McLearn, F. H. 1926. New species from the Coloradoan of lower Smoky and lower Peace Rivers, Alberta. Contributions to Canadian Palaeontology; Geological Survey. Geological Survey of Canada, Museum Bulletin 42: 117–126. Google Scholar

    48.

    McLearn, F.H. 1929. Palaeontology. In Mesozoic Palaeontology of Blairmore Region, Alberta. Bulletin of the Natural History Museum of Canada 58: 73–79. Google Scholar

    49.

    Meek, F.B. 1871. Preliminary paleontological report, consisting of lists of fossils, with description of some new types, etc. United States Geological Survey of Wyoming (Hayden), Preliminary Report 4: 287– 318. Google Scholar

    50.

    Meek, F.B. 1876. A report on the invertebrate Cretaceous and Tertiary fossils of the upper Missouri country. United States Geological Survey of the Territories Report 9: 1–629. Google Scholar

    51.

    Meek. F.B., and F.V. Hayden. 1858. Descriptions of new organic remains collected in Nebraska Territory in the year 1857, by Dr. F.V. Hayden, Gelogist to the Exploring Expedition under the command of Lieut. G.K. Warren, Top. Engr. U.S. Army, together with some remarks on the geology of the Black Hills and portions of the surrounding country. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 10: 41–59. Google Scholar

    52.

    Meek. F.B., and F.V. Hayden. 1862. Description of new Cretaceous fossils from Nebraska Territory, collected by the expedition sent out by the government under the command of liet. John Mullan, U.S. Topographical Engineers, for the location and construction of a Wagon Road from the sources of the Missouri to the Pacific Ocean. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 14: 21–28. Google Scholar

    53.

    Mitura, F., S. Ciesliński, and J. Milewicz. 1969. Upper Cretaceous inocerams from the North Sudetic Basin. Biuletyn Instytutu Geologicznego 217: 169– 181. Google Scholar

    54.

    Müller, G. 1888. (“1887”) Beitrag zur Kenntnis der oberen Kreide am nördlichen Harzrande. Jahrbuch des Preußischen Geologischen Landesanstalt 8: 372–456. Google Scholar

    55.

    Müller, G. 1900. Die Gliederung der Actinocamax-Kreide im nordwestlischen Deutschland. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft 52: 38–39. Google Scholar

    56.

    Nagao, T. and T. Matsumoto. 1939. A monograph of the Cretaceous Inoceramus of Japan. Part I. Journal of the Faculty of Science, Hokkaido Imperial University (Series 4) 4: 241–299. Google Scholar

    57.

    Niebuhr, B., et al. 1999. The Upper Cretaceous succession (Cenomanian-Santonian) of the Staffhorst Shaft, Lower Saxony, northern Germany: integrated biostratigraphic, lithostratigraphic and downhole geophysical log data. Acta Geologica Polonica 49: 175–213. Google Scholar

    58.

    Nikitin, S. 1888. Les vestiges de la période crétacee dans la Russie centrale. Memoires du Comité Géologique (St. Petersburg) 5: 163 pp. Google Scholar

    59.

    Noda, M. 1975. Succession of Inoceramus in the Upper Cretaceous of Southwest Japan. Memoirs of the Faculty of Science, Kyushu University, Series D, Geology 23: 211–261. Google Scholar

    60.

    Noda, M. 1988. Notes on Cretaceous inoceramids from Sakhalin, held at Tohoku University, Sendai. Saito Ho-on Kai Special Publication (Professor Tamio Kotaka Commemorative Volume): 137–175. Google Scholar

    61.

    Noda, M. 1996. Five inoceramids (Bivalvia) from the Upper Cretaceous of Hokkaido with some phylogenetic and taxonomic considerations, Part 1. Introductory remarks, method and systematic descriptions of one species of Inoceramus (I.) and one of I. (Volviceramus). Transactions and Proceedings of the Palaeontological Society of Japan, N.S. 184: 555–570. Google Scholar

    62.

    Noda, M., and T. Matsumoto. 1998. Palaeontology and stratigraphy of the inoceramid species from the mid-Turonian through upper Middle Coniacian in Japan. Acta Geologica Polonica 48: 345–482. Google Scholar

    63.

    Ødum, H. 1953. De geologiska resultaten fran Borningarna vid Höllviken. De. V: the macro-fosils of the Upper Cretaceous. Sverige Geologiska Undersökning, Ser. C 527: 1–37. Google Scholar

    64.

    Orbigny, A. d' 1843–1847. Paléontologie française. Terrains crétacés 3 (Lamellibranches). Paris: Masson & Cie, 807 pp. Google Scholar

    65.

    Parkinson, J. 1819. Remarks on the fossils collected by Mr. Phillips near Dover and Folkstone. Transactions of the Geological Society (London) 5: 1–55. Google Scholar

    66.

    Pergament, M.A. 1971. Biostratigraphy and inocerams of Turonian-Coniacian deposits of the Pacific regions of the USSR. Transactions of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Geological Institute 212: 1–196. [in Russian] Google Scholar

    67.

    Petrascheck, W. 1903. Ueber Inoceramen aus der Kreide Böhmens und Sachsens. Jahrbuch der Kaiserlich-Königlischen Reichsanstalt 53: 153–168. Google Scholar

    68.

    Plint, A.G., R.G. Walker, and K.M. Bergman. 1986. Cardium Formation 6. Stratigraphic framework of the Cardium in subsurface. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology 34: 213–225. Google Scholar

    69.

    Radwanska, Z. 1969. Kreda w otworze Sady IG-1. Kwartalnik Geologiczny 13: 709–710. Google Scholar

    70.

    Remin, Z. 2004. Biostratigraphy of the Santonian in the SW margin of the Holy Cross Mountains near Lipnik, a potential reference section for extra-Carpathian Poland. Acta Geologica Polonica 54: 587–596. Google Scholar

    71.

    Schlüter, C. 1877. Kreide-Bivalven. Zur Gattung Inoceramus. Palaeontographica 24: 250–288. Google Scholar

    72.

    Scott, G.R. and W.A. Cobban. 1964. Stratigraphy of the Niobrara Formation at Pueblo, Colorado. Professional Paper of the United States Geological Survey 454-L: 1–30. Google Scholar

    73.

    Scupin, H. 1912–1913. Die Löwenberger Kreide und ihre Fauna. Palaeontographica (Suppl. 6): 1–276. Google Scholar

    74.

    Seitz, O. 1962. Über Inoceramus (Platyceramus) mantelli Mercey (Barrois) aus dem Coniac und die Frage des Byssus-Ausschittes bei Oberkreide-Inoceramen. Geologisches Jahrbuch 79: 353–386. Google Scholar

    75.

    Seitz, O. 1965. Die Inoceramen des Santon und Unter- Campan von Nordwestdeutschland. II. Teil. Biometrie, Dimorphismus und Stratigraphie der Untergattung Sphenoceramus J. Böhm. Beihefte zum Geologischen Jahrbuch 69: 1–194. Google Scholar

    76.

    Sokolov, D.V. 1914. Kreideinoceramen des Russischen Sachalin. Memoires du Comité Geologique, Nouvelle Série 83: 1–95. Google Scholar

    77.

    Sornay, J. 1980. Revision du sous-genre d'inocerame Tethyoceramus Heinz 1932 (Bivalvia) et de ses representants Coniaciens a Madagascar. Annales de Paléontologie 66: 135–150. Google Scholar

    78.

    Soukup, J. 1956. Das Vorkommen von Inoceramen aus der Gruppe subcardissoides in the böhmischen Kreide. Sborník Ústředního Ústavu Geologického 22: 103–122. Google Scholar

    79.

    Sowerby, J. 1814. In Article 6. Proceedings of philosophical societies-Linnaean Society. Annals of Philosophy 4: 448. Google Scholar

    80.

    Sowerby, J. de C. 1826–1829. The mineral conchology of Great Britain; or, Coloured figures and descriptions of those testaceous animals or shells, which have been preserved at various times and depths in the earth, vol. 6. London: Meredith, 230 pp. Google Scholar

    81.

    Stanton, T.W. 1894. The Colorado Formation and its invertebrate fauna. Bulletin of the Unites States Geological Survey 106: 3–189. [1893 imprint] Google Scholar

    82.

    Stille, H. 1909. Die Zone der Inoceramus koeneni G. Müller bei Paderborn. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft 61: 194–196. Google Scholar

    83.

    Stoliczka, F. 1871. Cretaceous fauna of southern India, vol. 3. The Pelecypoda, with a review of all known genera of this class, fossils and recent. Memoirs of the Geological Survey of India. Palaeontologica Indica: 1–507. Google Scholar

    84.

    Sturm, F. 1901 (“1900”). Der Sandstein von Kieslingswalde in der Grafschaft Glatz und seine Fauna. Jahrbuch der Königlich Preußischen Geologischen Landesanstalt und Bergakademie 21: 39–98. Google Scholar

    85.

    Tarkowski, R. 1991. Stratigraphy, macrofossils and palaeogeography of the Upper Cretaceous from the Opole Trough. Biuletyn Naukowy Akademii Górniczo- Hutniczej 51: 3–156. Google Scholar

    86.

    Toshimitsu, S. 1988. Biostratigraphy of the Upper Cretaceous Santonian Stage in northwestern Hokkaido. Memoires of the Faculty of Science of the Kyushu University D, Geology 26: 125–192. Google Scholar

    87.

    Tröger, K.-A. 1969. Bemerkungen zur Variabilität von Inoceramus koeneni G. Müller aus der subhercynen Kreide. Freiberger Forschungshefte C245: 68–81. Google Scholar

    88.

    Tröger, K.-A. 1974. Zur Biostratigraphie des Ober- Turon bis Unter-Santon aus dem Schahtaufschluss der Zeche Grimberg IV bei Bergkamen (BRD). Freiberger Forschungshefte C298: 109–138. Google Scholar

    89.

    Tröger, K.-A. 1981. Zu Problemen der Biostratigraphie der Inoceramen und der Untergliederung des Cenomans und Turons in Mittel-und Osteuropa. Newsletters on Stratigraphy 9: 139–156. Google Scholar

    90.

    Tröger, K.-A. 1989. Problems of Upper Cretacveous Inoceramid biostratigraphy and paleobiogeography in Europe and Western Asia. In J. Wiedmann (editor), Cretaceous of the Western Tethys. Proceedings 3rd International Cretaceous Symposium, Tübingen 1987: 911–930. Stuttgart: E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung. Google Scholar

    91.

    Tröger, K.-A., and W.K. Christensen. 1991. Upper Cretaceous (Cenomanian-Santonian) Inoceramid bivalve fauna from the island of Bornholm, Denmark. Danmarks Geologiske Undersogelse. DGU Serie A 28: 1–47. Google Scholar

    92.

    Tröger, K.-A., and H. Summesberger. 1994. Coniacian and Santonian bivalves from the Gosau-Group (Cretaceous, Austria) and their biostratigraphic and palaeobiogeographic significance. Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museum in Wien 96A: 161–197. Google Scholar

    93.

    Tsagarély, A. 1942. Les inocérames crétacés de la Géorgie. Académie des Sciencess de la RSS Géorgienne, Travaux de l'Institut Géologique, Série Géologique 1 (6), 90–205. Google Scholar

    94.

    Veatch, A.C. 1907. Geography and geology of a portion of southwestern Wyoming with special reference to coal and oil. Professional Paper of the Department of the Interior, United States Geological Survey 56. Google Scholar

    95.

    Walaszczyk, I. 1992. Turonian through Santonian deposits of the Central Polish Uplands; their facies development, inoceramid paleontology and stratigraphy. Acta Geologica Polonica 42: 1–122. Google Scholar

    96.

    Walaszczyk, I., and W.A. Cobban. 2000. Inoceramid faunas and biostratigraphy of the Upper Turonian-Lower Coniacian of the Western Interior of the United States. Special Paper in Palaeontology 64: 1–118. Google Scholar

    97.

    Walaszczyk, I., and W.A. Cobban. 2006. Palaeontology and biostratigraphy of the Middle-Upper Coniacian and Santonian inoceramids if the US Western Interior. Acta Geologica Polonica 56: 241–348. Google Scholar

    98.

    Walaszczyk, I., and W.A. Cobban. 2007. Inoceramid fauna and biostratigraphy of the upper Middle Coniacian-lower Middle Santonian of the Pueblo section (SE Colorado, US Western Interior). Cretaceous Research 28: 132–142. Google Scholar

    99.

    Walaszczyk, I., and C.J. Wood. 1998. Inoceramids and biostratigraphy at the Turonian/Coniacian boundary; based on the Salzgitter-Salder Quarry, Lower Saxony, Germany, and the Słupia Nadbrzeżna section, Central Poland. Acta Geologica Polonica 48: 395–434. Google Scholar

    100.

    Walaszczyk, I., R. Marcinowski, T. Praszkier, K. Dembicz, and M. Bieńkowska. 2004. Biogeographical and stratigraphical significance of the latest Turonian and Early Coniacian inoceramid/ammonite succession of the Manasoa section on the Onilahy River, south-west Madagascar. Cretaceous Research 25: 543–576. Google Scholar

    101.

    Walaszczyk, I., et al. 2010. The Salzgitter-Salder Quarry (Lower Saxony, Germany) and Słupia Nadbrzeżna river cliff section (central Poland): a proposed candidate composite Global Boundary Stratotype Section and Point for the Coniacian Stage (Upper Cretaceous). Acta Geologica Polonica 60: 445–477. Google Scholar

    102.

    Walaszczyk , et al. 2012. Testing the congruence of the macrofossil versus microfossil record in the Turonian-Coniacian boundary succession of the Wagon Mound-Springer composite section (NE New Mexico, USA). Acta Geologica Polonica 62: 581–594. Google Scholar

    103.

    Walaszczyk, I., L.F. Kopaevich, and V.N. Beniamovski. 2013. Inoceramid and foraminiferal record and biozonation of the Turonian and Coniacian (Upper Cretaceous) of the Mangyshlak Mts., western Kazakhstan. Acta Geologica Polonica 63: 469–487. Google Scholar

    104.

    Walaszczyk, I., et al. 2014a. Ammonite and inoceramid biostratigraphy and biogeography of the Cenomanian through basal Middle Campanian (Upper Cretaceous) of the Morondava Basin, western Madagascar. Journal of African Earth Sciences 89: 79–132. Google Scholar

    105.

    Walaszczyk, I., J.A. Shank, A.G. Plint, and W.A. Cobban. 2014b. Inter-regional correlation of disconformities in Upper Cretaceous strata, Western Interior Seaway: Biostratigraphic and sequencestratigraphic evidence for eustatic change. Geological Society of America, Bulletin 126: 307–316. Google Scholar

    106.

    Wegner, T. 1905. Die Granulaten-Kreide des Westfalischen Münsterlandes. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft 57: 112–232. Google Scholar

    107.

    Westermann, G.E.G. 2000. Biochore classification and nomenclature in paleobiogeography: an attempt at order. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 158: 1–13. Google Scholar

    108.

    White, C.A. 1879. Contributions to invertebrate paleontology, no. 1: Cretaceous fossils of the Western States and Territories. Department of the Interior. United States Geological Survey, 11th Annual Report of the Survey for the year 1877: 273–319. Google Scholar

    109.

    Wood, C.J., I. , Walaszczyk , R. Mortimore, and M. Woods. 2004. New observations on the inoceramid biostratigraphy of the higher part of the Upper Turonian and the Turonian-Coniacian boundary transition in Poland, Germany and the UK. Acta Geologica Polonica 54: 541–549. Google Scholar

    110.

    Woods, H. 1912. A monograph of the Cretaceous Lamellibranchia of England, vol. 2, part 8. Monographs of the Palaeontographical Society (for 1911): 285–340. Google Scholar

    111.

    Zonova, T.D. 1992. Cretaceous Inoceramids of eastern USSR. In T.D. Zonova, and K.O. Rostovtskev (editors), Atlas of the Mesozoic guide fossil faunal groups of southern and eastern USSR: 172–191. Transactions of VSEGEI, New Series 350: 375 pp. [in Russian] Google Scholar

    112.

    Zonova, T.D. 1993. Inoceramidae. In T.D. Zonova and A.I. Zhamoyda (editors), Atlas of the key paleontological groups of the Upper Cretaceous of Sakhalin: 85–143. Nedra; Sankt-Peterburg. [in Russian] Google Scholar
    Ireneusz Walaszczyk, A. Guy Plint, and Neil H. Landman "Chapter 2: Inoceramid Bivalves from the Coniacian and Basal Santonian (Upper Cretaceous) of the Western Canada Foreland Basin," Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 2017(414), 53-103, (26 June 2017). https://doi.org/10.1206/0003-0090-414.1.4
    Published: 26 June 2017
    Back to Top