Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 December 2010 Gymnosporia Cryptopetala Reyes-Bet. & A. Santos (Celastraceae), a New Species from the Canary Islands
Jorge Alfredo Reyes-Betancort, Arnoldo Santos Guerra
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

REYES-BETANCORT, J. A. & A. S. GUERRA (2010). Gymnosporia cryptopetala Reyes-Bet. & A. Santos (Celastraceae), a new species from the Canary Islands. Candollea 65: 189–196. In English, English and French abstracts.

Gymnosporia cryptopetala Reyes-Bet. & A. Santos, a new species from the easternmost Canary Islands (Lanzarote and Fuerteventura), is described and illustrated. It belongs to sect. Tenuispinae and shows a close relationship with geographically distant species such as Gymnosporia tenuispina (Sond.) Szyszyl. and Gymnosporia emarginata (Willd.) Thwaites, among others species.

Introduction

The genus Gymnosporia (Wight & Arn.) Hook. f. has recently been reinstated to include all its thorny members, previously placed under Maytenus Molina. It comprises about 118 taxa, occurring in the whole of Africa, Madagascar and adjacent islands, southern Spain, the near Middle East, Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Vietnam, China, Taiwan, Ryukyu Islands (Japan), Malesia, Australia (Queensland), and the Polynesian Islands (Jordaan & van Wyk, 1999, 2003, 2006; Simmons, 2004). Molecular data also support that Gymnosporia, and Putterlickia Endl., are a natural group distinct from Maytenus (Simmons & al., 2001a, 2001b, 2008).

Besides the Canarian endemic Gymnosporia cassinoides (L'Hér.) Masf. (= Maytenus canariensis (Loes.) G. Kunkel & Sunding), recorded for all the Canary Islands except Lanzarote, a second species of the genus is found in the easternmost islands (Lanzarote and Fuerteventura). The first author who noted the presence of this second species was Kunkel (1973) who reported Gymnosporia sp. from Lanzarote, but without detailed data about its location, awaiting a correct determination. After this the same author added new localities for Lanzarote but plants were included under the name of Gymnosporia senegalensis (Lam.) Loes. (Kunkel, 1974, 1975, 1976). In spite of that, Kunkel showed doubts about the infraspecific range of Lanzarote plants (Kunkel, 1977). Santos & Fernández (1984) recorded this species also from Fuerteventura under the name Maytenus senegalensis (Lam.) Exell. Finally, Scholz (2005) added another locality for Fuerteventura, at Montaña de Cardones. The inaccessibility of the majority of plants in these two islands makes it difficult to study them, especially the flower and fruit characters. The study of new collections and the monitoring of some plants cultivated in the garden of the Instituto Canario de Investigaciones Agrarias at Valle Guerra (Tenerife) for more than twenty years led us to the conclusion that these plants belong to a new undescribed species.

  • Gymnosporia cryptopetala Reyes-Bet. & A. Santos, spec. nova (Fig. 1)

    Gymnosporia senegalensis auct. Canar., non (Lam.) Loes. 1893.

    Maytenus senegalensis auct. Canar., non (Lam.) Exell 1952.

    Typus: Spain. Canary Islands, Lanzarote: very rare in Famara cliffs, below El Castillejo, 1.IV.1980, A. Santos & M. Fernández 27078 (holo-: ORT; iso-: MA, PAL).

    Ab G. tenuispina affinis sed spinis patentis, robustioribus; foliis margine integro vel paucidentato; petalis brevioribus; capsula late conici-truncata vel subglobosa; arillo albo differt. Ab G. emarginata, G. diversifolia, G. leptopus et G. commiphoroides similis sed ab eis petalis brevibus, capsula et semina maioribus dignoscenda. Praeterea a G. diversifolia differt frutice rigidi, ramosissimi, foliis saepissime fasciculatis in brachyblastis bene evolutis, atque ab G. emarginata differt semina castanea. Ab G. commiphoroides affinis sed frutex robustior, inermis vel parvo spinosus, ramis cinereus et semina castanea distinguitur. Ab G. leptopus similis sed inflorescentia breviter pedunculatae instructa.

    Shrub up to 1.5 m high, normally dioecious, many branched, unarmed or thorny (specially in young stage); bark gray, reticulate (reddish, smooth with small white lenticels when young); branches terete, with well developed brachyblasts up to 1.5 cm. Thorns (modified stem with sharp point), when present, robust, axillary, patent up to 2.5 cm. Leaves fasciculate towards tips of brachyblasts (alternate in young branches), glabrous, thick, coriaceous, pale green; lamina narrowly oblanceolate to obovate, rarely elliptic-oblong, 15–40 × 5–25 mm, apex rounded or emarginate, shortly mucronate, margin thickened, usually entire or remotely crenate, reticulate venation usually obscure above, more prominent below; petiole short, 2–5 mm long, reddish. Inflorescence cymose, axillary or crowded at upper part of a short-shoot, subsessile to pedunculate up to 7 mm. Bracts triangular-lanceolate, margin fimbriate. Pedicels glabrous, 1–7 mm long, articulate below the middle. Flowers green-reddish, ± 3 mm in diameter. Sepals 5, triangular, ± 0.6–0.8 mm long, apex acute, margin ciliate-fimbriate. Petals 5, ovatelanceolate, 0.4–0.8 × 0.2–0.5 mm, margin ciliate-fimbriate, abaxially fused with brown at the tip. Disc narrow, fleshy, subpentagonal, adnate. Male flowers: stamens longer than ovary (filaments ca. 2 mm); anthers broadly ovoid; pistillode globose, small (semi-immersed), style very short, stigmas erect. Female flowers: disc narrower, staminodes shorter than stamens in male flowers (filaments ca. 1 mm); ovary 1/3 immersed in disc, 2 or 3 locular; 2 ovules per locule; style cylindrical, 2–3-branched (branches flattened), spreading. Capsule widely conic-truncate to subglobose, flattened (trigonous if 3-locular), flat-topped, apiculate, 2-valved or 3-valved, 7–10 × 8–11 mm, green-reddish to purple-red, turning light brown to purple-brown when dry. Seed 1–3, ellipsoid, brown, glossy, 4.5–5 × 3 mm; aril white (turning light brown when dry), cerebriform, an oblique basal rim.

  • Etymology. — The specific epithet refers to the inconspicuous petals of the plant.

  • Distribution and habitat. — Endemic to the easternmost Canary Islands, Lanzarote and Fuerteventura (Fig. 2). Growing on vertical, inaccessible cliffs, which constitute a refuge from goats and rabbits, very rare in lava flows, at altitudes of 80–650 m. Gymnosporia cryptopetala has its optimum in termophilous scrubs in the inframediterranean xeric semiarid bioclimatic belt growing jointly with Olea cerassiformis Rivas- Mart. & del-Arco, Phillyrea angustifolia L., Rhamnus crenulata Ait., Pistacia lentiscus L., etc. It can grow also in the inframediterranean desertic arid bioclimatic belt but in this case is located in the most humid stands like those found on north facing cliffs or lava flows.

  • Conservation status. — Gymnosporia cryptopetala is extremely rare and is known from few localities. In Lanzarote it grows in three different areas: in Montaña Halcones (Timanfaya National Park), where only one individual was recorded; in Famara Massif we know around four or five individuals (the inaccessibility of this area makes counting it difficult), and in the Malpaís de La Corona where only three individuals have been located. On the other hand, only eight or nine plants are known on Fuerteventura, one or two individuals near La Matilla, one in Montaña Cardones, one on the north facing slopes of Pico de la Zarza, and five in the Esquinzo Valley (Stephan Scholz pers. comm.). For this reason we propose CR D status (Critically Endangered, criteria “D”) according to the IUCN (2001) Red List Categories. Although all populations are included within the nature reserve network of Lanzarote or Fuerteventura (Ley 4/2006 de modificación del Texto Refundido de las Leyes de Ordenación del Territorio de Canarias y de Espacios Naturales de Canarias), the low proportion of female individuals demands its urgent inclusion in a rescue programme to preserve the genetic diversity of this species.

  • Relationships. — Hitherto specimens of this species have been identified as “Gymnosporia senegalensis”, but it differs in having well-developed brachyblasts, inconspicuous petals, and a fleshy basal aril. In our opinion, G. cryptopetala is better placed in sect. Tenuispinae Jordaan which includes taxa with capsules usually longer than 5 mm and arils which are reduced to rims at the base of seeds. Sect. Gymnosporia, to which G. senegalensis belongs, includes taxa with globose to subglobose, dark purple or reddish, small (usually less than 5 mm) capsules and where the aril partially enveloped the seed.

    From the morphological point of view this new species shows affinities with G. tenuispina (Sond.) Szyszyl., especially in the morphology of the fruit which is 3-gonous (or flattened if 2-locular), truncate, chartaceous and smooth (Robson, 1966). Nevertheless the Canarian plants have robust thorns (when present) longer than 1 cm long, always axillary (never terminating short branches); flowers are smaller (3–4 mm in diam not 5–7 mm); petals are less than 1 mm (2–2.5 mm long in G. tenuispina); capsule ovate to rounded (not obconic). Seeds 1–3, brown (purplish- or reddish-brown in G. tenuispina) and with a white aril (yellow in G. tenuispina).

    Gymnosporia cryptopetala shows clear affinites with other taxa in sect. Tenuispinae, like G. gariepensis Jordaan from the northern Cape of South Africa and southern parts of Namibia, G. commiphoroides H. Perrier and G. leptopus (Tul.) Baker from Madagascar, G. emarginata (Willd.) Thwaites from India and Sri Lanka and G. diversifolia Maxim. from Asia, but differs in the small size of the petals (0.4-0.8 mm long) which are longer than 1 mm in the other species.

    The sexuality and biotype of G. cassinoides (hermaphrodite, small tree), the presence of larger petioles and leaves, dichasial inflorescences, well-developed petals and obconictrigonous fruits are characters which distinguish it from G. cryptopetala. Morphological differences between some species in this section are summarized in Table 1.

  • Discussion. — Plants studied from Fuerteventura show 3-valved fruits whilst plants from Lanzarote are 2-valved. Different colonisation events (including the founder effect) followed by isolation of populations of both islands provide a hypothetical explanation of the geographical distribution of this character. Despite this we consider this difference to be variability of the species itself, but it is important to keep in mind for conservation programs.

  • Gymnosporia cryptopetala has a well-defined distribution not shared with another species of sect. Tenuispinae (with the exception of the Canarian endemic G. cassinoides). This geographical disjunction between island species and the closest continental relatives is well-known in others endemic plants from the Canary Islands (Fig. 3; Perrier, 1946; Robson, 1966; Jordaan & van Wyk, 2003; Jordaan, 2005; Hyde & Wursten, 2009; Quanru & Funston, 2008), f.i. for Helichrysum Mill. (Galbany-Casals & al., 2009), Dracaena L. (Marrero & al., 1998) and Sideroxylon L. (Lobin & al., 2005).

    Gymnosporia cryptopetala seems to be another species that supports the hypothesis of a huge but fragmented arid belt reaching from the Namib Desert to the Western Sahara (including arid parts of the Cape Verde and Canary Islands) via Eastern Africa (Quézel, 1978; Bramwell, 1986; Jürgens, 1997).

  • Additional material examined. — Spain. Canary Islands, Lanzarote: Malpaís de La Corona, c. Peña del Artisco, 6.III. 2008, J. A. Reyes-Betancort & A. Perdomo 41123 (ORT). Fuerteventura: Montaña Aceitunal, 19.V.1979, A. Santos & M. Fernández 25305 (ORT); Valle de Esquinzo, 400 m, 24.VI.1980, M. Fernández 27219 (ORT); Valle de Esquinzo, 400 m, 20.II.2007, S. Scholz 39426 (ORT); Valle de Esquinzo, 350 m, 24.II.2006, S. Scholz 47903 (TFC); way up to Pico de la Zarza, 500 m, 25.IV.1979, A. Santos & M. Fernández 25304 (ORT); Montaña Cardones, 550 m, 13.V.2003, S. Scholz 46499 (TFC); ex horto Casa Sick (Esquinzo), 15.I.2009, S. Scholz 41096 (ORT).

  • Fig. 1.

    Gymnosporia cryptopetala Reyes-Bet. & A. Santos. A. Branch showing leaves, a young branch (on the right) and fruits (on the left); B. Branch showing well developed brachyblasts; C. Leaves; D. Female flowers; E. Sepal; F. Two petals; G. Lateral and cross section views of the fruit; H. Seed with aril.

    [Drawings by J. A. Reyes-Betancort]

    f01_189.jpg

    Fig. 2.

    — Present day distribution of Gymnosporia cryptopetala Reyes-Bet. & A. Santos (black dots) in the eastern Canary Islands.

    f02_189.jpg

    Fig. 3.

    — Distribution map of the species of Gymnosporia sect. Tenuispinae mentioned in the text. Gymnosporia commiphoroides H. Perrier (white star), G. cryptopetala Reyes-Bet. & A. Santos (bull's-eye), G. leptopus (Tul.) Baker (black star), G. diversifolia Maxim. (black rhombuses), G. emarginata (Willd.) Thwaites (black dots), G. tenuispina (Sond.) Szyszyl. (black squares), G. gariepensis Jordaan (black triangles), G. cassinoides (L'Hér.) Masf. (white triangles).

    f03_189.jpg

    Table 1.

    — Some differential characteristics of the species of Gymnosporia (Wight & Arn.) Hook. f. mentioned in the text.

    t01a_189.gif

    Continued.

    t01b_189.gif

    Acknowledgements

    We would like to express our gratitude to Stephan Scholz who provided us with useful information on Fuerteventura populations of this new species. We are also indebted to the anonymous reviewer for their valuable comments and suggestions to the manuscript.

    References

    1.

    D. Bramwell (1986). Contribución a la biogeografía de las islas Canarias. Bot. Macaronésica 14: 3–34. Google Scholar

    2.

    M. Galbany-Casals , N. garcía-Jacas , LL. Sáez , C. Benedí & A. susanna (2009). Phylogeny, Biogeography, and Character Evolution in Mediterranean, Asiatic, and Macaronesian Helichrysum (Asteraceae, Gnaphalieae) Inferred from Nuclear Phylogenetic Analyses. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 170: 365–380. Google Scholar

    3.

    M. A. Hyde & B. Wursten (2009). Flora of Zimbabwe: Checklist: Celastraceae. [ http://www.zimbabweflora.co.zw/speciesdata/utilities/utility-display-checklist.php?family_id=53, retrieved 1 April 2009]. Google Scholar

    4.

    IUCN (2001). IUCN Red List categories and criteria, version 3.1. IUCN. Google Scholar

    5.

    M. Jordaan (2005). A new species of Gymnosporia (Celastraceae) from Southern Africa. Novon 15: 301–304. Google Scholar

    6.

    M. Jordaan & A. E. Van Wyk (1999). Systematic studies in subfamily Celastroideae (Celastraceae) in southern Africa: reinstatement of the genus Gymnosporia. S. Afr. J. Bot. 65: 177–181. Google Scholar

    7.

    M. Jordaan & A. E. Van Wyk (2003). Reinstatement of Gymnosporia (Celastraceae): implications for the Flora Malesiana region. Telopea 10: 155–167. Google Scholar

    8.

    M. Jordaan & A. E. Van Wyk (2006). Sectional classification of Gymnosporia (Celastraceae), with notes on the nomenclatural and taxonomic history of the genus. Taxon 55: 515–525. Google Scholar

    9.

    N. Jürgens (1997). Floristic biodiversity and history of African arid regions. Biodivers. & Conservation 6: 495–514. Google Scholar

    10.

    G. Kunkel (1973). Nuevas adiciones para la flora de las Islas Orientales. Cuad. Bot. Canaria 18–19: 25–31. Google Scholar

    11.

    G. Kunkel (1974). Resultados de dos viajes a Fuerteventura y Lanzarote. Cuad. Bot. Canaria 20: 17–23. Google Scholar

    12.

    G. Kunkel (1975). Inventario de los Recursos Naturales Renovables de la Provincia de Las Palmas (Islas Canarias, España). Cabildo Insular de Gran Canaria y Excma. Mancomunidad Interinsular de las Palmas. Google Scholar

    13.

    G. Kunkel (1976). Enumeración de las plantas vasculares del Parque Nacional de Timanfaya (Lanzarote) con notas adicionales. Cuad. Bot. Canaria 26–27: 41–58. Google Scholar

    14.

    G. Kunkel (1977). Endemismos Canarios. Inventario de las Plantas Vasculares Endémicas en la Provincia de Las Palmas. Ministerio de Agricultura. Google Scholar

    15.

    W. Lobin , T. Leyens , A. Santos Guerra , H. Costa Neves & I. Gomes (2005). The genus Sideroxylon (Sapotaceae) on the Madeira, Canary Islands and Cape Verde archipelagoes. Vieraea 33: 119–144. Google Scholar

    16.

    A. Marrero , R. S. Almeida & M. gonzález-Martín (1998). A new species of wild dragon tree, Dracaena (Dracaenaceae) from Gran Canaria and its taxonomic and biogeographic implications. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 128: 291–314. Google Scholar

    17.

    H. Perrier (1946). Gymnosporia. In : H. Humbert , Fl. Madagascar & Comores 116: 17–29. Tananarive Imprimerie Officielle. Google Scholar

    18.

    L. Quanru & M. Funston (2008). Gymnosporia. In : Z. Y. Wu , P. H. Raven & D. Y. Hong (ed.), Fl. China 11: 474–477. Science Press. Google Scholar

    19.

    P. Quézel (1978). Analysis of the Flora of mediterranean and Saharan Africa. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 65: 501–535. Google Scholar

    20.

    N. K. B. Robson (1966). Celastraceae. In : A. W. Exell & H. Wild (ed.), Fl. Zambes. 2: 355–418. Crown Agents. Google Scholar

    21.

    A. Santos & M. Fernández (1984). Notas florísticas de las islas de Lanzarote y Fuerteventura (I. Canarias). Anales Jard. Bot. Madrid 41: 167–174. Google Scholar

    22.

    S. Scholz (2005). Las plantas vasculares. Catálogo florístico. In : O. Rodríguez Delgado (ed.), Patrimonio Natural de la Isla de Fuerteventura: 241–280. Excmo. Cabildo de Fuerteventura, Gobierno de Canarias y Centro de la Cultura Popular Canaria. Google Scholar

    23.

    M. P. Simmons (2004). Celastraceae. In: K. Kubitzki (ed.), The Families and Genera of Flowering Plants 6: 29–64. Springer. Google Scholar

    24.

    M. P. Simmons , J. J. Cappa , R. H. Archer , A. J. Ford , D. Eichstedt & C. C. Clevinger (2008). Phylogeny of the Celastreae (Celastraceae) and the relationships of Catha edulis (qat) inferred from morphological characters and nuclear and plastid genes. Molec. Phylogen. Evol. 48: 745–757. Google Scholar

    25.

    M. P. Simmons , C. C. Clevinger , V. Savolainen , R. H. Archer , S. Mathews & J. J. Doyle (2001a). Phylogeny of the Celastraceae inferred from phytochrome B and morphology. Amer. J. Bot. 88: 313–325. Google Scholar

    26.

    M. P. Simmons , V. Savolainen , C. C. Clevinger , R. H. Archer & J. I. Davis (2001b). Phylogeny of the Celastraceae inferred from 26S nrDNA, phytochrome B, atpB, rbcL, and morphology. Molec. Phylogen. Evol. 19: 353–366. Google Scholar
    © CONSERVATOIRE ET JARDIN BOTANIQUES DE GENÈVE 2010
    Jorge Alfredo Reyes-Betancort and Arnoldo Santos Guerra "Gymnosporia Cryptopetala Reyes-Bet. & A. Santos (Celastraceae), a New Species from the Canary Islands," Candollea 65(2), 189-196, (1 December 2010). https://doi.org/10.15553/c2010v652a2
    Received: 30 April 2009; Accepted: 24 August 2010; Published: 1 December 2010
    KEYWORDS
    Canary Islands
    Celastraceae
    Gymnosporia
    taxonomy
    Back to Top