Translator Disclaimer
1 June 2008 Increased per capita herbivory in the shade: Necessity, feedback, or luxury consumption
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Leaf chemistry and physiology vary with light environment and are often thought to directly affect herbivory patterns. Biotic (e.g., parasitoids and predators) and abiotic (e.g., temperature, relative humidity) factors known to influence herbivory also co-vary with light environment. Irrespective of mechanism, light-based differences in herbivore damage must be the result of variable herbivore abundance, per capita effects, or both. We examined the effect of light environment on leaf defence and leaf nutritional quality in Lindera benzoin (Lauraceae) and relate this to the abundance and impact of its lepidopteran herbivore Epimecis hortaria (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). In this system we consistently observe greater natural field herbivory in shade habitats relative to high light habitats, despite similar herbivore abundances; differences in herbivory are therefore most likely attributable to different per capita impacts of herbivores across environments. Potential herbivore behaviours responsible for the observed field pattern include increased foraging per day and longer developmental periods in shade habitats. A more complete understanding of observed herbivory patterns requires incorporating variation in herbivore behaviour as influenced by abiotic or biotic factors that co-vary with the different light environments.

Nomenclature: Gleason & Cronquist, 1991.

Norris Z. Muth, Emily C. Kluger, Jennifer H. Levy, Marten J. Edwards, and Richard A. Niesenbaum "Increased per capita herbivory in the shade: Necessity, feedback, or luxury consumption," Ecoscience 15(2), (1 June 2008). https://doi.org/10.2980/15-2-3095
Received: 11 April 2007; Accepted: 1 August 2007; Published: 1 June 2008
JOURNAL ARTICLE
7 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top