Translator Disclaimer
1 February 2005 Biological Control Insect Use of Fertilized and Unfertilized Diffuse Knapweed in a Colorado Grassland
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The responses and impacts of five insect species that feed on Centaurea diffusa Lamarck, diffuse knapweed, to soil nitrogen and phosphorus additions were studied in grasslands east of the Colorado Front Range. We predicted that fertilization was unlikely to have a direct effect on herbivory but that if the insects preferentially select vigorous plants, increased tissue nitrogen, plant density, or plant mass resulting from fertilization would increase plant susceptibility to biological control insects. Fertilization caused a modest increase in the biomass of C. diffusa adults and the nutritive content of aboveground plant biomass. Larinus minutus Gyllenhal, a seed head weevil, was less abundant and exhibited reduced impacts on fertilized C. diffusa plants. Abundance of gall fly larvae, Urophora spp., was negatively influenced by the presence of L. minutus and had no detectable effect on seed abundance. No positive or negative impacts of root feeders on knapweed were observed, but the root-feeding Cyphocleonus achates (Fahraeus) selected plants in fertilized plots, whereas the root phytophage Sphenoptera jugoslavica Obenberger was more common on knapweed in unfertilized plots. Our results indicate that these specialist biological control insects exhibit little preference based on plant biomass, density, or nutritive quality. However, variables that affect the timing of knapweed seed production, such as fertilization, mowing, and grazing, reduce insect impacts and may explain some of the regional variation in effectiveness of these insects as biological controls on knapweed.

K. D. Lejeune, K. N. Suding, S. Sturgis, A. Scott, and T. R. Seastedt "Biological Control Insect Use of Fertilized and Unfertilized Diffuse Knapweed in a Colorado Grassland," Environmental Entomology 34(1), 225-234, (1 February 2005). https://doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X-34.1.225
Received: 29 April 2004; Accepted: 1 November 2004; Published: 1 February 2005
JOURNAL ARTICLE
10 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top