Translator Disclaimer
1 April 2000 WHY IT IS DIFFICULT TO MODEL SPERM DISPLACEMENT IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER: THE RELATION BETWEEN SPERM TRANSFER AND COPULATION DURATION
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

We have investigated the effects of experimental manipulation of copulation duration on sperm displacement in Drosophila melanogaster. Both spermless and normal males were used as second (displacing) males in the experiments. Displacement induced in the absence of sperm, that is, by males that pass accessory gland fluid alone, was a relatively inefficient process and produced much lower levels of displacement than normal males. Therefore, the presence of second-male sperm is necessary (but unlikely sufficient) for the high levels of displacement commonly observed in D. melanogaster. Furthermore, when second matings were interrupted at various times after the initiation of copulation, the distribution of displacement was strongly bimodal. We conclude that sperm transfer is relatively rapid, beginning shortly after the initiation of copulation, and is essentially complete before the midpoint of copulation. Therefore, sperm transfer bears no simple relation to copulation duration. Because it would be difficult to manipulate the numbers of sperm transferred by manipulating copulation duration, methods used to study sperm displacement in other insect species are unlikely to be appropriate for D. melanogaster. We also investigated why males mate for more than twice the duration that appears to be necessary to complete sperm transfer. Experimental interruption of first matings indicated that the extra copulation time serves to delay female remating, rather than to increase that rate at which of offspring are sired before remating.

Corresponding Editor: T. Markow

A. S. Gilchrist and L. Partridge "WHY IT IS DIFFICULT TO MODEL SPERM DISPLACEMENT IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER: THE RELATION BETWEEN SPERM TRANSFER AND COPULATION DURATION," Evolution 54(2), (1 April 2000). https://doi.org/10.1554/0014-3820(2000)054[0534:WIIDTM]2.0.CO;2
Received: 18 February 1999; Accepted: 1 October 1999; Published: 1 April 2000
JOURNAL ARTICLE
9 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top