Translator Disclaimer
1 August 2002 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND HOST GENOTYPE DIRECT GENETIC DIVERSITY OF VENTURIA DITRICHA, A FUNGAL ENDOPHYTE OF BIRCH TREES
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

We investigated whether genetic variation of a common foliar endophyte of birch trees, Venturia ditricha, is affected by environmental conditions or host genotype. Fungal samples were collected from 10 half-sibling families of mountain birch (Betula pubescens ssp. czerepanovii) grown in two environmental conditions with different daily average temperatures: a forested river valley and an adjacent open tundra (altitudinal difference 180 m). Genetic analysis of V. ditricha isolates was done using random amplified microsatellite polymerase chain reaction. We found that host genotypes, along with prevailing environmental conditions, influence the probability of infection by particular endophyte genotypes. The most susceptible host genotypes were highly infected with genetically similar endophyte genotypes, whereas the most resistant trees were poorly infected and they were infected by genetically dissimilar endophytes. Our results also showed environment–host genotype interactions, suggesting that the susceptibility of the host to a particular endophyte genotype may change in natural environments when environmental conditions are changed. It appears that a particular endophyte genotype needs to find the right host genotype for a successful infection. There are many host genotypes in natural stands; this means, from the point of view of the fungus, the environment is heterogeneous. Thus, under the influence of birch tree genotypes, genetically differentiated subgroups of the endophytic fungus may be formed in different environments.

Jouni U. Ahlholm, Marjo Helander, Janne Henriksson, Mary Metzler, and Kari Saikkonen "ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND HOST GENOTYPE DIRECT GENETIC DIVERSITY OF VENTURIA DITRICHA, A FUNGAL ENDOPHYTE OF BIRCH TREES," Evolution 56(8), (1 August 2002). https://doi.org/10.1554/0014-3820(2002)056[1566:ECAHGD]2.0.CO;2
Received: 4 February 2002; Accepted: 21 May 2002; Published: 1 August 2002
JOURNAL ARTICLE
8 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top