Translator Disclaimer
1 April 2006 SYMMETRY BREAKING IN INTERSPECIFIC DROSOPHILA HYBRIDS IS NOT DUE TO DEVELOPMENTAL NOISE
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Hybrids from crosses of different species have been reported to display decreased developmental stability when compared to their pure species, which is conventionally attributed to a breakdown of coadapted gene complexes. Drosophila subobscura and its close relative D. madeirensis were hybridized in the laboratory to test the hypothesis that genuine fluctuating asymmetry, measured as the within-individual variance between right and left wings that results from random perturbations in development, would significantly increase after interspecific hybridization. When sires of D. subobscura were mated to heterospecific females following a hybrid half-sib breeding design, F1 hybrid females showed a large bilateral asymmetry with a substantial proportion of individuals having an asymmetric index larger than 5% of total wing size. Such an anomaly, however, cannot be plainly explained by an increase of developmental instability in hybrids but is the result of some aberrant developmental processes. Our findings suggest that interspecific hybrids are as able as their parents to buffer developmental noise, notwithstanding the fact that their proper bilateral development can be harshly compromised. Together with the low correspondence between the covariation structures of the interindividual genetic components and the within-individual ones from a Procrustes analysis, our data also suggest that the underlying processes that control (genetic) canalization and developmental stability do not share a common mechanism. We argue that the conventional account of decreased developmental stability in interspecific hybrids needs to be reappraised.

Carla Rego, Margarida Matos, and Mauro Santos "SYMMETRY BREAKING IN INTERSPECIFIC DROSOPHILA HYBRIDS IS NOT DUE TO DEVELOPMENTAL NOISE," Evolution 60(4), 746-761, (1 April 2006). https://doi.org/10.1554/05-540.1
Received: 26 September 2005; Accepted: 3 February 2006; Published: 1 April 2006
JOURNAL ARTICLE
16 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top