Translator Disclaimer
1 November 2009 Asymmetric, Bimodal Trade-Offs During Adaptation of Methylobacterium to Distinct Growth Substrates
Author Affiliations +

Trade-offs between selected and nonselected environments are often assumed to exist during adaptation. This phenomenon is prevalent in microbial metabolism, where many organisms have come to specialize on a narrow breadth of substrates. One wellstudied example is methylotrophic bacteria that can use single-carbon (C1) compounds as their sole source of carbon and energy, but generally use few, if any, multi-C compounds. Here, we use adaptation of experimental populations of the model methylotroph, Methylobacterium extorquens AM1, to C1 (methanol) or multi-C (succinate) compounds to investigate specialization and trade-offs between these two metabolic lifestyles. We found a general trend toward trade-offs during adaptation to succinate, but this was neither universal nor showed a quantitative relationship with the extent of adaptation. After 1500 generations, succinate-evolved strains had a remarkably bimodal distribution of fitness values on methanol: either an improvement comparable to the strains adapted on methanol or the complete loss of the ability to grow on C1 compounds. In contrast, adaptation to methanol resulted in no such trade-offs. Based on the substantial, asymmetric loss of C1 growth during growth on succinate, we suggest that the long-term maintenance of C1 metabolism across the genus Methylobacterium requires relatively frequent use of C1 compounds to prevent rapid loss.

© 2009 The Society for the Study of Evolution.
Ming-Chun Lee, Hsin-Hung Chou, and Christopher J. Marx "Asymmetric, Bimodal Trade-Offs During Adaptation of Methylobacterium to Distinct Growth Substrates," Evolution 63(11), 2816-2830, (1 November 2009).
Received: 21 November 2008; Accepted: 1 May 2009; Published: 1 November 2009

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.

Get copyright permission
Back to Top