Translator Disclaimer
1 May 2009 Asymmetric Viability of Reciprocal-Cross Hybrids between Crested and Marbled Newts (Triturus cristatus and T. marmoratus)
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Hybridization between divergent lineages often results in reduced hybrid viability. Here we report findings from a series of independent molecular analyses over several seasons on four life stages of F1 hybrids between the newts Triturus cristatus and T. marmoratus. These two species form a bimodal hybrid zone of broad overlap in France, with F1 hybrids making up about 4% of the adult population. We demonstrate strong asymmetry in the direction of the cross, with one class (cristatus-mothered) making up about 90% of F1 hybrids. By analyzing embryos and hatchlings, we show that this asymmetry is not due to prezygotic effects, as both classes of hybrid embryos are present at similar frequencies, implicating differential selection on the two hybrid classes after hatching. Adult F1 hybrids show a weak Haldane effect overall, with a 72% excess of females. The rarer marmoratus-mothered class, however, consists entirely of males. The absence of females from this class of adult F1 hybrids is best explained by an incompatibility between the cristatus X chromosome and marmoratus cytoplasm. It is thus important to distinguish the two classes of reciprocal-cross hybrids before making general statements about whether Haldane's rule is observed.

© 2009 The Society for the Study of Evolution.
Jan W. Arntzen, Robert Jehle, Fevzi Bardakci, Terry Burke, and Graham P. Wallis "Asymmetric Viability of Reciprocal-Cross Hybrids between Crested and Marbled Newts (Triturus cristatus and T. marmoratus)," Evolution 63(5), 1191-1202, (1 May 2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00611.x
Received: 25 June 2008; Accepted: 1 December 2008; Published: 1 May 2009
JOURNAL ARTICLE
12 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top