Translator Disclaimer
1 July 2009 Postzygotic Isolation Over Multiple Generations of Hybrid Descendents in a Natural Hybrid Zone: How Well Do Single-Generation Estimates Reflect Reproductive Isolation?
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Understanding speciation depends on an accurate assessment of the reproductive barriers separating newly diverged populations. In several taxonomic groups, prezygotic barriers, especially preferences for conspecific mates, are thought to play the dominant role in speciation. However, the importance of postzygotic barriers (i.e., low fitness of hybrid offspring) may be widely underestimated. In this study, we examined how well the widely used proxy of postzygotic isolation (reproductive output of F1 hybrids) reflects the long-term fitness consequences of hybridization between two closely related species of birds. Using 40 species-specific single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers, we genotyped a mixed population of collared and pied flycatchers (Ficedula albicollis and F. hypoleuca) to identify grand- and great grand-offspring from interspecific crosses to derive an accurate, multigeneration estimate of postzygotic isolation. Two independent estimates of fitness show that hybridization results in 2.4% and 2.7% of the number of descendents typical of conspecific pairing. This postzygotic isolation was considerably stronger than estimates based on F1 hybrids. Our results demonstrate that, in nature, combined selection against hybrids and backcrossed individuals may result in almost complete postzygotic isolation between two comparatively young species. If these findings are general, postzygotic barriers separating hybridizing populations may be much stronger than previously thought.

© 2009 The Society for the Study of Evolution.
Chris Wiley, Anna Qvarnström, Gunilla Andersson, Thomas Borge, and Glenn-Peter Sætre "Postzygotic Isolation Over Multiple Generations of Hybrid Descendents in a Natural Hybrid Zone: How Well Do Single-Generation Estimates Reflect Reproductive Isolation?," Evolution 63(7), 1731-1739, (1 July 2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00674.x
Received: 25 September 2008; Accepted: 1 February 2009; Published: 1 July 2009
JOURNAL ARTICLE
9 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top