Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2017 Susceptibility of Bactericera cockerelli Sulc (Hemiptera: Triozidae) Nymphs to Sivanto® 200 SL (Flupyradifurone)
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Sivanto® 200 SL (flupyradifurone) was recently introduced into the Mexican market for the control of Bactericera cockerelli Sulc (Hemiptera: Triozidae) in different solanaceous crops such as potato, tomato, and pepper, which are important crops in Mexico. The objective of this study was to determine the toxicity of flupyradifurone on 5th instar potato psyllids in 3 field-collected populations and a laboratory susceptible one. There were no differences in susceptibility to flupyradifurone among the evaluated populations. The lethal concentration values (LC) at 50% of mortality ranged from 243.2 to 368.1 mg per L at 24 h, after 48 h of exposure, LC50 values were between 51.0 to 62.5 mg per L. The LC95 values at 24 h ranged from 2403 to 5265 mg per L, and at 48 h of exposure were between 506.5 to 936.9 mg per L. The relative toxicity (RT) at 50% of mortality was 4.07 to 4.97 times higher after 48 h than after 24 h. Moreover, an antifeedant effect associated with flupyradifurone decreased the amount of excreta after 24 h of feeding by 51, 42, and 75% at the flupyradifurone dosages of 30, 50, and 100 mg per L, respectively, relative to the untreated control.

The potato psyllid, Bactericera cockerelli Sulc (Hemiptera: Triozidae), is 1 of the most damaging pests of potato (Solanum tuberosum L. [Solanaceae]), tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L. [Solanaceae]), and pepper (Capsicum annuum L. [Solanaceae]) crops in Mexico, as well as in some regions of the United States and Guatemala (Munyaneza et al. 2007, 2009a, 2009b, 2009c, 2012). Besides the direct attack to the plant, this pest is able to transmit the bacteria Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum (Rhizobiaceae) (Rubio et al. 2006; Liefting et al. 2009), which reduces the fruit quantity and quality in the affected crops (Buchmann et al. 2011). This plant pathogen affects more than 35% of the potato-growing area planted in Texas, USA, causing yearly losses of more than US $25 million (CNAS, 2006).

In Mexico, most growers use insecticides as the only tool against the potato psyllid (Rubio et al. 2006; Vega et al. 2008), generating an intense selection pressure that increases the probability of developing resistance. Sivanto® 200 SL (flupyradifurone) is a new insecticide developed to control different species of sucking insects (Nauen et al. 2015). In Mexico, growers have been using this insecticide since 2015, and it is authorized and recommended for the potato psyllid control in the indicated crops. The objective of this study was to determine, under laboratory conditions, the toxicity of flupyradifurone to 5th instar nymphs of B. cockerelli from 3 fieldcollected populations and to determine if this insecticide exerts an antifeedant effect.

Materials and Methods

INSECTS

One of the populations was field-collected 3 times from the municipality of Tianguistenco, State of Mexico (Toluca Valley), Mexico, during Sep and Oct 2015 in commercial potato fields (19.1202°N, 99.4319°W). The second population was field-collected twice in the municipalities of Yecapixtla, Atlatlahuacán and Totolapan, State of Morelos, Mexico, during Sep 2016 from commercial tomato fields (18.9522°N, 98.8756°W). The third population was field-collected 1 time during Aug 2016 in the Municipality of Galeana, State of Nuevo León, Mexico, from commercial potato fields (25.0505°N, 100.6399°W). At each collection site, 3 sampling points located at least 1 km apart were randomly selected. At each point, ≥ 100 leaflets, 1 per plant, infested with nymphs were collected. At least 500 nymphs were collected per site. The individuals from the different collection sites, of each population, were mixed and placed in cages (70 × 50 × 50 cm) to obtain, under laboratory conditions, enough nymphs from the F1 generation to carry out bioassays. As a susceptible reference population we used a B. cockerelli population that had been reared under laboratory conditions free of selection pressure by insecticides since 2008. The insects were reared on > 50-d-old tomato plants, variety Rio Grande. In order to obtain nymphs of similar age, 2 tomato plants were introduced into the cages with adults and infested with at least 500 adults. They then were allowed to lay eggs for 24 h before being removed. Rearing was under greenhouse conditions at a temperature of 27 ± 5 °C and 70 ± 10% relative humidity.

INSECTICIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY

Laboratory tests were conducted with the commercial formulation of Sivanto® 200 SL (flupyradifurone, 200 g per L, soluble liquid, Bayer de Mexico S.A. de C.V.). To prepare the required insecticide concentrations, distilled water was used.

The leaf-dip test described for the pear psyllid (Psylla spp.) and proposed by the Insecticide Resistance Action Committee was used with slight modifications (IRAC 2009). Disks 3.3 cm in diameter were cut from leaflets from mid-height on > 50-d-old tomato plants. On each leaflet, 15–25 healthy 5th instars were deposited and after 30 min the infested leaf disk was dipped in a concentration of Sivanto® 200 SL for 10 s. Afterward, they were left in a laminar flow hood for 30 min to eliminate excess moisture and placed with the underside down in a Petri dish containing 2 mL 2% agar. Initially, we determined the range of concentrations that produced from 0 up to 100% mortality (biological response window). Then, at least 6 intermediate concentrations were included to evenly cover that range. Percent mortality was determined after 24 h and 48 h of exposure; a nymph was considered dead if it did not react to the touch of a paint brush. At least 5 replications were conducted on different days, and each replication included an untreated control. The highest level of acceptable mortality for the untreated control was 10% and corrected by means of the Abbott's formula (Abbott 1925).

Table 1.

Toxicity at 24 and 48 h of the insecticide Sivanto® 200 SL (flupyradifurone) applied to 5th instar nymphs in different populations of Bactericera cockerelli Sulc.

t01_704.gif

In all cases, the treated individuals were maintained under controlled conditions at 27 ± 2 °C, 70 ± 5% RH, and 16:8 h L:D photoperiod. The data on mortality were subjected to a Probit analysis with the Polo-Plus software program (Robertson et al. 2003), to calculate slope, lethal concentration (LC) at 50 and 95% of mortality, confidence limits at 95%, and parallelism (equal slopes) were interpreted using the Chi-square test at a 5% significance level. In addition, we determined the relative toxicity at 50% of mortality (RT50), which was obtained by dividing the LC50 of the corresponding population after 24 h by the LC50 of the same population after 48 h. The responses of the compared populations were considered to be not statistically different when the confidence limits overlap (Robertson & Preisler 1992).

ANTIFEEDANT EFFECT

The same experimental procedure as described above was used, except that we placed 10 fifth instars of the susceptible population on each leaf disc. Three concentrations of flupyradifurone (30, 50, and 100 mg per L) and 1 control with distilled water were tested. Each treatment was replicated 4 times. After 24 h, the number of excreta in each treatment was counted. The number of excreta were subjected to an analysis of variance by means of the SAS statistical software, version 9.4 (SAS Institute 2016), before analysis, the data were tested for normality, and transformation was not necessary. We used Tukey's means comparison test (P = 0.05) to establish differences among the evaluated treatments. It was assumed that the amount of excreta was positively correlated with the amount of food ingested by the nymph, which therefore reflected feeding intensity.

Results

There were no significant differences in susceptibility of nymphs to Sivanto® 200 SL among the evaluated populations, including the reference susceptible population, given that the confidence limits overlapped both at the LC50 level as well as at the LC95 level with both 24 and 48 h of exposure, respectively (Table 1). After 24 h, the LC50 values were between 243.2 (Morelos) and 368.1 mg per L (Toluca) (Table 1). After 48 h of exposure, the LC50 values decreased and were between 51.0 (Morelos) and 62.5 mg per L (Galeana) (Table 1). The Toluca population was not evaluated at 48 h because the controls had mortality above 10%.

After 24 h of exposure, the LC95 values were between 2403 (Morelos) and 5265 mg per L (Toluca) (Table 1). After 48 h of exposure, the LC95 values decreased relative to the values observed after 24 h and were between 506.5 (susceptible) and 936.9 mg per L (Galeana). When comparing the slopes of the populations, these were statistically equal at both 24 h (χ22, 3 = 3.83, P = 0.281) and 48 h (χ22, 2 = 2.98, P = 0.225).

Comparison of the values at the LC50 level of each population after 24 h with those at LC50 after 48 h showed significant differences in the response to flupyradifurone because the confidence limits did not overlap (Table 1). The values of RT50 were 4.07 to 4.97 times higher after 48 h than after 24 h.

As the concentration of Sivanto® 200 SL increased, the amount of excreta produced by the 5th instars decreased significantly with respect to the untreated control (F3, 12 = 20.8; df = 3,12; P < 0.0001) (Fig. 1). The percentage of excreta inhibition for the dosages of 30, 50, and 100 mg per L were 51, 42, and 75%, respectively, after 24 h.

Discussion

Insecticides have an important role in agriculture because they reduce yield losses caused by phytophagous insects (Oerke 2006). However, development of resistance due to continuous use of insecticides limits their use (Tabashnik et al. 2014). For this reason, insecticide use should be based on knowledge of the pest susceptibility and other factors such as effects on feeding behavior (Lagunes et al. 2009). Additionally, the needs of today's agriculture requires the development of novel tools and more environment-friendly approaches (Sparks & Lorsbach 2017).

Sivanto® 200 SL is an insecticide that displays both ingestion and contact activity (Nauen et al. 2015) to the potato psyllid. It is classified as a nicotinic receptor agonist and grouped in the new “D” category of group 4 of the insecticide classification proposed by the Insecticide Resistance Action Committee (IRAC 2017). Cross resistance in populations resistant to neonicotinoids, such as imidacloprid, has not been demonstrated.

Exposure time to an insecticide modifies the response values (fFrench-Constant & Roush 1990). As exposure time increases, the LC values decrease and the confidence limits become narrower. The RT50 increased from 4.07 to 4.97 when the nymphal exposure was increased from 24 to 48 h. We did not further increase the exposure time due to emergence of adults (MATR, personal observation).

The antifeedant effect of flupyradifurone observed in this study is consistent with the information documented by Nauen et al. (2015), who observed a reduction in the excretion of honeydew by adults of Myzus persicae (Sulzer) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) after 4 h following exposure on leaves of Brassica napus L. (Brassicaceae) treated with a concentration of 250 mg per L of this insecticide. This effect may lead to a decrease in the rate of diseases transmitted by vectors (Castle et al. 2009). In field experiments where Sivanto® has been used, it is associated with reduction in the incidence of zebra chip disease (Lewis et al. 2012; FSG, personal communication), though additional studies are needed to confirm this. The lack of differences in the susceptibility of the psyllids to flupyradifurone in the evaluated populations is likely due to the relatively short period of time that this type of insecticides has been used in Mexico (since the end of 2015).

Fig. 1.

Number of excreta produced after 24 h by 5th instars of Bactericera cockerelli Sulc treated with different concentrations of flupyradifurone. Treatments with the same letter are not significantly different (P ≥ 0.05; Tukey's test). Error bars represent standard error of the mean.

f01_704.jpg

The results obtained in this study indicate that field populations are susceptible to the insecticide flupyradifurone. This insecticide also reduces the feeding rate of the exposed nymphs of B. cockerelli. The results of this research may serve as a baseline reference for later studies.

Acknowledgments

MATR received a scholarship from Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT) Mexico.

References Cited

1.

Abbott WS. 1925. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. Journal of Economic Entomology 18: 265–267. Google Scholar

2.

Buchman JL, Sengonda VG, Munyaneza JE. 2011. Vector transmission efficiency of Liberibacter by Bactericera cockerelli (Hemiptera: Triozidae) in zebra chip potato disease: Effects of psyllid life stage and inoculation access period. Journal of Economic Entomology 104: 1486–1495. Google Scholar

3.

Castle S, Palumbo J, Prabhaker N. 2009. Newer insecticides for plant virus disease management. Virus Research 141: 131–139. Google Scholar

4.

CNAS - Center for North American Studies. 2006. Economic impacts of zebra chip on the Texas potato industry,  http://cnas.tamu.edu/zebra%20chip%20impacts%20final.pdf (last accessed 20 Jan 2017). Google Scholar

5.

fFrench-Constant RH, Roush RT. 1990. Resistance detection and documentation: the relative roles of pesticidal and biochemical assays, pp. 4–38 In Roush RT, Tabashnik BE [Eds.]. Pesticide Resistance in Arthropods. Chapman & Hall, New York, USA. Google Scholar

6.

IRAC - Insecticide Resistance Action Committee. 2009. Susceptibility Test Methods Series: Method 2 “Psylla spp.”,  http://www.irac-online.org/methods/psylla-spp-all-stages/ (last accessed 20 Jan 2017). Google Scholar

7.

IRAC - Insecticide Resistance Action Committee. 2017. Mode of action classification scheme, v 8.2, March 2017,  http://www.irac-online.org/documents/moa-classification/?ext=pdf (last accessed 12 Apr 2017). Google Scholar

8.

Lagunes A, Rodríguez JC, Loera JC. 2009. Susceptibilidad a insecticidas en poblaciones de artrópodos de México. Agrociencia 43: 173–196. Google Scholar

9.

Lewis M, Michels J, Bible J, Jones E, Lange R, Footle D, Brazille J, Crites S, Carroll B. 2012. Evaluating the efficacy of insecticides and insecticide regimes against potato psyllid to control zebra chip, pp. 140–144 In Workneh F, Rashed A, Rush CM [Eds.]. Proceedings of the 12th Annual 2012 Zebra Chip Reporting Session. San Antonio, Texas, USA. Google Scholar

10.

Liefting LW, Sutherland PW, Ward LI, Paice KL, Weir BS, Clover GRG. 2009. A new ‘Candidatus Liberibacter’ species associated with diseases of solanaceous crops. Plant Disease 93: 208–214. Google Scholar

11.

Munyaneza JE, Goolsby JA, Crosslin JM, Upton JE. 2007. Further evidence that zebra chip potato disease in the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas is associated with Bactericera cockerelli. Subtropical Plant Science 59: 30–37. Google Scholar

12.

Munyaneza JE, Sengoda VG, Crosslin JM, Rosa G, Sanchez A. 2009a. First report of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter psyllaurous’ in potato tubers with zebra chip disease in Mexico. Plant Disease 93: 552. Google Scholar

13.

Munyaneza JE, Sengoda VG, Crosslin JM, Garzón A, Cardenas OG. 2009b. First report of “Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum” in tomato plants in Mexico. Plant Disease 93: 1076. Google Scholar

14.

Munyaneza JE, Sengoda VG, Crosslin JM, Garzón A, Cardenas OG. 2009c. First report of “Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum” in pepper plants in Mexico. Plant Disease 93: 1076. Google Scholar

15.

Munyaneza JE. 2012. Zebra chip disease of potato: biology, epidemiology, and management. American Journal of Potato Research 89: 329–350. Google Scholar

16.

Nauen R, Jeschke P, Velten R, Beck ME, Ebbinghaus U, Thielert W, Wölfel K, Hass M, Kunz K, Raupach G. 2015. Flupyradifurone: a brief profile of a new butenolide insecticide. Pest Management Science 71: 850–862. Google Scholar

17.

Oerke EC. 2006. Crop losses to pests. The Journal of Agricultural Science 144: 31–43. Google Scholar

18.

Robertson JL, Preisler HK. 1992. Pesticide Bioassays with Arthropods. CRC, Boca Raton, Florida, USA. Google Scholar

19.

Robertson JL, Preisler HK, Russell RM. 2003. Polo Plus. Probit and logit analysis user's guide. LeOra Software, Berkeley, California, USA. Google Scholar

20.

Rubio OA, Almeyda IH, Ireta J, Sánchez JA, Fernández R, Borbón JT, Díaz C, Garzón JA, Rocha R, Cadena MA. 2006. Distribución de la punta morada y Bactericera cockerelli Sulc. en las principales zonas productoras de papa en México. Agricultura Técnica en México 32: 201–211. Google Scholar

21.

SAS Institute. 2016. SAS User's Manual 9.4. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA. Google Scholar

22.

Sparks TC, Lorsbach BA. 2017. Perspectives on the agrochemical industry and agrochemical discovery. Pest Management Science 73: 672–677. Google Scholar

23.

Tabashnik BE, Mota D, Whalon ME, Hollingworth RM, Carrière Y. 2014. Defining terms for proactive management of resistance to Bt crops and pesticides. Journal of Economic Entomology 107: 496–507. Google Scholar

24.

Vega MT, Rodríguez JC, Díaz O, Bújanos R, Mota D, Martínez JL, Lagunes A, Garzón JA. 2008. Susceptibilidad a insecticidas en dos poblaciones mexicanas del salerillo, Bactericera cockerelli (Sulc) (Hemiptera: Triozidae). Agrociencia 42: 463–471. Google Scholar
Manuel Alejandro Tejeda-Reyes, J. Concepción Rodríguez-Maciel, Elías Tapia-Ramos, Francisco Santos-González, Miguel Ángel Reyes-Pérez-Martínez, Santos Díaz-Martínez, and Mateo Vargas-Hernández "Susceptibility of Bactericera cockerelli Sulc (Hemiptera: Triozidae) Nymphs to Sivanto® 200 SL (Flupyradifurone)," Florida Entomologist 100(4), 704-707, (1 December 2017). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.100.0416
Published: 1 December 2017
JOURNAL ARTICLE
4 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top