Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 March 2018 Management of Flower Thrips in Florida Strawberries with Steinernema feltiae (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae) and the Insecticide Sulfoxaflor
Justin M. Renkema, Braden Evans, Shashan Devkota
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Flower thrips (mainly Frankliniella spp.) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) are common in Florida strawberries, causing bronzed fruit and reduced yields. As control relies on just a few insecticides, there is a need to evaluate novel management options and insecticides. The entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema feltiae (Filipjev) (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae) has been shown to be effective on flower thrips larvae in other plants, and the new insecticide sulfoxaflor has been effective on thrips in other crops. In winter 2016, S. feltiae was evaluated at 2 foliar application rates (2.47 and 4.94 billion infective juveniles per ha) in combination with and without the insecticide spinetoram by counting thrips in strawberry flowers and assessing numbers of damaged fruits. A second experiment was conducted to compare sulfoxaflor, spinetoram, and S. feltiae applications based on flower thrips thresholds. High and low S. feltiae rates did not reduce or suppress thrips and did not reduce fruit damage. Sulfoxaflor reduced thrips by 60 to 70% compared to the reduction caused by spinetoram. Hot, dry conditions likely limited the survival and effectiveness of S. feltiae. Sulfoxaflor appears to be a promising insecticide for flower thrips, and may reduce reliance on spinetoram by strawberry producers.

Thrips (Thysanoptera) are small, slender “fringe-winged” insects, of which many species are plant feeders, and some are significant pests of crops and commodities worldwide (Childers 1997). Thrips in the genus Frankliniella (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) (flower thrips) feed on swollen buds, open flowers, and developing fruits of many vegetables, fruits, and ornamentals, therein causing necrosis, cellular collapse, distortion, discoloration, silvering, or fruit abortion (Childers & Achor 1991; Childers 1997; Shipp et al. 2000). In strawberry, Frankliniella spp. and other genera have been linked to flower damage and fruit bronzing and scarring in many production regions, including the United States, Europe, Australia and Japan (Steiner & Goodwin 2005). The cosmopolitan Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) may have the greatest economic impact on strawberry, but relationships between F. occidentalis density and crop damage are variable (Steiner & Goodwin 2005; Coll et al. 2006; Atakan 2011). Frankliniella occidentalis has been established in Florida, USA, since 1982 and has affected strawberry production in the state since 2004 (Kirk & Terry 2003; Whidden 2004). In addition, the native Frankliniella bispinosa Morgan (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) occurs in strawberry in the southern half of Florida and likely causes flower and fruit damage, as it does in blueberry and bell pepper (Reitz et al. 2003; Rhodes and Liburd 2011). Frankliniella spp. can be difficult to manage because of their cryptic behavior, rapid reproduction, and the ability of F. occidentalis to develop resistance to insecticides (Immaraju et al. 1992; Broadbent & Pree 1997). Therefore, new approaches and tools for thrips management are needed for Florida strawberries.

Entomopathogenic nematodes have been widely assessed for suppression of life stages of agricultural pests that are spent primarily in the soil, where free-living infective juvenile nematodes occur (Gothro 2000). When the host insect's habitat is suitably humid and cryptic, entomopathogenic nematodes have shown some efficacy for suppression of above-ground pests (Olthof & Broadbent 1992; Williams & Walters 2000; Shapiro-Ilan et al. 2006). Several entomopathogenic nematode species attack soil-dwelling pupae of F. occidentalis (Ebssa et al. 2001), and Steinernema feltiae (Filipjev) (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae) is capable in the laboratory of causing mortality to the larval and pre-pupal stages (Buitenhuis & Shipp 2005). Wardlow et al. (2001) reported effective control of F. occidentalis with weekly applications, but Buitenhuis & Shipp (2005) reported no reduction of F. occidentalis after a foliar application in chrysanthemum, Dendranthema grandiflora Tzvelev (Compositae), flowers. Factors that affect entomopathogenic nematode efficacy include the innate infectivity of nematode species, differences in susceptibility of thrips developmental stages, differences among thrips species, the complexity of flowers and degree of concealment for entomopathogenic nematodes afforded by flowers, and addition of adjuvants that may facilitate entomopathogenic nematode movement and host finding by reducing rates of drying and desiccation (Kaya & Gaugler 1993; Broadbent & Olthof 1995; Baur et al. 1997; Buitenhuis & Shipp 2005; Cuthbertson et al. 2005).

Fig. 1.

Least square means (± 95% confidence intervals) for (A) adult and (B) larval thrips (Frankliniella bispinosa) per 10 strawberry flowers from research plots near Balm, Florida, sprayed 26 Feb, and 1, 5, and 9 Mar 2016 with Steinernema feltiae or insecticides. Means in each panel with the same letter are not significantly different (Tukey's HSD test, α = 0.05) (Experiment 1).

f01_102.jpg

In addition to non-chemical controls, new insecticides with novel modes of action will be useful for developing an effective management program for thrips in strawberries. The sulfoximines, in particular sulfoxaflor, act on insect nicotinic receptors, similar to other insecticide classes (spinosysns, neonicotinoids), but have a number of different structure-activity relationships that confer a unique mode of action (Watson et al. 2011; Sparks et al. 2013). Sulfoxaflor has potent insecticidal activity on many sap-feeding insects, and has not exhibited crossresistance when tested on imidacloprid-resistant strains of sweetpotato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) and brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stål) (Hemiptera: Delphacidae) (Babcock et al. 2011). For thrips control, 4-insecticide rotations including an application of sulfoxaflor were as effective as rotations without sulfoxaflor for suppression of flower thrips species in Florida strawberries; however, sulfoxaflor-specific data was not presented (Cleuver et al. 2016). Sulfoxaflor reduced melon thrips, Thrips palmi Karny (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), in eggplant (Seal 2012); citrus thrips, Scirtothrips citri (Moulton) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), in navel oranges and southern highbush blueberries (Haviland & Rill 2015; Van Steenwyk et al. 2016); and F. occidentalis in iceberg head lettuce (Natwick & Lopez 2014). Sulfoxaflor may be an effective alternative to commonly used insecticides for thrips in Florida strawberries, such as spinetoram and acetamiprid, but further testing is needed.

Thrips have become a major challenge for Florida producers of winter (Nov–Mar) strawberries (Cluever et al. 2016). As seasonal temperatures have been above historical average and freezing events rare in recent years in strawberry producing areas (FAWN 2017), flower thrips populations do not decline but remain high throughout the season. Wild hosts are common around fields; wild radish, Raphanus raphanistrum L. (Brassicaceae), seems to be increasing in abundance and produces flowers almost continuously throughout the strawberry season, acting as a reservoir for F. bispinosa (Cleuver et al. 2016). Chilli thrips, Scirtothrips dorsalis Hood (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), is a recent Florida invader of subtropical/tropical origin (Dickey et al. 2015) that damages new foliage of young strawberry plants and is having an increased impact with fall and winter temperatures, generally above-normal in recent years. Furthermore, the same insecticides are typically effective on flower and chilli thrips, so growers must carefully manage the timing of a limited number of applications. The objective of this study was to evaluate foliar applications of S. feltiae and the insecticide sulfoxaflor in Florida strawberries for suppression of flower-inhabiting thrips, and on strawberry yield. This research was conducted in an effort to provide Florida strawberry growers with additional tools to rotate with existing products and practices for thrips control.

Table 1.

Analysis of variance results and means (95% confidence limits) for thrips (Frankliniella bispinosa) and insidious flower bugs (Orius spp.) per 10 flowers, and thrips-damaged strawberries from plots sprayed with Steinernema feltiae, spinetoram, or both treatments 26 Feb to 9 Mar 2016 near Balm, Florida (Experiment 1). Means within columns followed by the same letter are not significantly different (Tukey's HSD, α = 0.05).

t01_102.gif

Materials and Methods

Two experiments to test efficacy of insecticides and an entomopathogenic nematode on flower thrips were conducted in plots of winter strawberries at the Gulf Coast Research and Education Center, Balm, Florida, USA (27.7621°N, 82.2258°W). Bare-root strawberry transplants (cv. ‘Radiance’) were set 14 Oct 2015 at 38 cm spacing in raised, black plastic-mulched beds at 1.2 m spacing. Fumigation with Telone® C-35 (1,3-dichloropropene + chloropicrin) occurred at bed formation on 20 Aug 2015. Plants were overhead irrigated for 10 d following transplanting and drip-irrigated and fertigated with 0.27 and 0.34 kg N per d from Nov to Jan and Feb to Apr, respectively. Round-up® (glyphosate) and Chateau® (flumioxazin) were applied to row aisles before transplanting to control weeds. Plants received weekly applications of fungicides and occasional applications of DiPel® DF (Bacillus thuringiensis, subsp. kurstaki) Berliner (Bacillales) to control lepidopteran larvae.

Each strawberry plot was a 10 m double-row, single bed (50–54 plants). Plots were laid out in 5 adjacent beds in a randomized complete block design, with a 1 m and 2 m unplanted buffer on the ends of plots within blocks and between blocks, respectively. Experiment 1 was conducted on the first, third, and fifth row, and Experiment 2 on the second and fourth row, so that there were unsprayed strawberry rows between plots for both experiments.

Treatments were applied at 940 L per ha with a CO2-powered backpack sprayer (R & D Sprayers, Opelousas, Louisiana, USA) at 60 PSI using a hand-held wand sprayer with 2 nozzles without filters. Insecticides, entomopathogenic nematodes, and controls (water) were mixed with the non-ionic surfactant, Induce® (0.25% v/v) (Helena Chemical Co., Collierville, Tennessee, USA). Applications were made 1 h prior to sunset to facilitate entomopathogenic nematode survival in flowers. Treatment efficacy was evaluated by randomly selecting 10 open flowers per plot and quickly placing them in plastic centrifuge tubes (50 mL) half-filled with 70% ethanol. In the laboratory, flowers were poured from tubes into Petri dishes and each flower was held with forceps and washed with additional ethanol before discarding it. Adult and larval thrips and predatory insidious flower bugs (Orius spp.) (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) in the ethanol were identified and counted under a stereomicroscope. Yield was evaluated by harvesting all ripe strawberries in each plot and evaluating for thrips-related damage, such as bronzing, scarring, or cracking.

Table 2.

Analysis of variance results and means (95% confidence limits) for thrips (Frankliniella bispinosa) and insidious flower bugs (Orius spp.) per 10 flowers, and thrips-damaged strawberries from plots sprayed with Steinernema feltiae, spinetoram, or sulfoxaflor 2 to 24 Mar 2016 near Balm, Florida (Experiment 2). Means within columns followed by the same letter are not significantly different (Tukey's HSD, α = 0.05).

t02_102.gif

EXPERIMENT 1

Treatment applications began when symptoms of flower thrips injury— flower abortion and petal browning or necrotic flecking—were first observed in late Feb and daily temperatures began to increase. Spinetoram (Radiant® SC, 11.7%, Dow AgroSciences, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA) at 85.5 mL active ingredient per ha, and S. feltiae (Nemasys®, BASF Corp., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA), prepared according to the manufacturer's specifications in cold water at 2.47 (low rate) and 4.94 (high rate) billion infective juveniles per ha, were applied 26 Feb, and 1, 5, and 9 Mar 2016. Treatments were spinetoram, S. feltiae low rate, or S. feltiae high rate applied on all dates; spinetoram applied on the first 2 dates followed by water or S. feltiae low rate on the final 2 dates; and a water only control on all dates. Flowers were sampled 26 Feb, and 1, 5, 9, and 16 Mar 2016, and strawberries were harvested 1, 5, 9, 14, and 19 Mar 2016.

EXPERIMENT 2

Initial treatments were spinetoram, S. feltiae (high rate) and sulfoxaflor (Closer® SC, 21.8%, Dow AgroSciences, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA) at 78.45g per ha. Treatments were re-applied when thrips numbers exceeded a threshold of 5 thrips per flower. Flowers were sampled 2, 7, 11, 15, 20, and 24 Mar 2016. Thrips were counted from at least 2 replications of each treatment to make subsequent application decisions. All treatments were applied 3 Mar 2016, S. feltiae was reapplied 7, and 16 Mar 2016, and spinetoram and sulfoxaflor were reapplied 16 Mar 2016. Water was applied to plots when thrips numbers were below threshold. Strawberries were harvested 21 Mar 2016. A subsample of adult thrips were randomly selected from each sample (15% of total, but a minimum of 8 or maximum of 20) and identified to species.

DATA ANALYSIS

For each experiment, a mixed-model analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test effects of treatments on numbers of total thrips, larval thrips, adult thrips, insidious flower bugs, yield per plant, and proportion of thrips-damaged strawberries. Sample date and date by treatment interaction were included as repeated measures, and block as random effect. Because yield and damage were evaluated only once in Experiment 2, there was no date term in the ANOVA. Numbers of total and adult thrips and yield were log (x) transformed, larval thrips log (x + 1) transformed, and insidious flower bug and damage square-root (x) transformed to normalize error variance and meet ANOVA assumptions. Means were compared using Tukey's HSD test at α = 0.05. Backtransformed means and 95% confidence intervals are displayed. JMP® Pro 12.0.1 (SAS 2015) was used for analysis.

Results

EXPERIMENT 1

All adult thrips in subsamples were F. bispinosa; no F. occidentalis, F. shultzei, or H. gowdeyi were identified, as in Cleuver et al. (2016). Applications of spinetoram at 2 times, 4 times, or 2 times the normal rate followed by a low rate of S. feltiae at twice the normal rate, reduced total thrips, adult thrips, and larval thrips compared to the control, but low or high application rates of S. feltiae did not (Table 1). Adult thrips numbers were lower in all plots on 9 Mar 2016 compared to 1 Mar 2016, whereas larval thrips numbers remained similar among all sample dates for the control and S. feltiae-treated plots (Fig. 1A, B). Applications of spinetoram + S. feltiae did not reduce adult or larval thrips compared to spinetoram alone (Fig. 1A, B). Numbers of insidious flower bugs differed among treatments, but no significant separation of means was detected using Tukey's HSD test. Four applications of spinetoram resulted in about half as many insidious flower bugs compared to the control (Table 1). There were no differences in total yield among treatments (F = 1.1; df = 5,79; P = 0.364) or among treatments by harvest dates (F = 0.9; df = 20,79; P = 0.904). The proportion of thrips-damaged fruit was greater in the control compared to spinetoram only treatments, but there were no differences between the control and S. feltiae-treated plots (Table 1).

EXPERIMENT 2

Numbers of total and larval thrips were affected by treatments, but adults were not affected (Table 2). There were about twice as many larval thrips with applications of S. feltiae compared to sulfoxaflor, and about half as many larvae when comparing spinetoram to sulfoxaflor (Table 2). Even though there was not a significant treatment by date interaction, adult thrips numbers appeared to be reduced to a greater extent in plots treated with spinetoram and sulfoxaflor compared to S. feltiae-treated and control plots. However, after 7 Mar 2016 adult thrips numbers were similar among treatments (Fig. 2A). Larval thrips numbers were reduced by spinetoram and sulfoxaflor as compared to S. feltiae treatments, and control was achieved for almost 2 wk following first application on 3 Mar 2016 (Fig. 2B). The number of insidious flower bugs was affected by treatment, with more than twice as many in control than spinetoram and sulfoxaflor plots (Table 2). Yield was not affected by the treatments (F3,9 = 1.4; P = 0.303). Thrips-damaged fruit was affected by treatment, with almost zero damage when spinetoram was applied, compared to about 1% when sulfoxaflor was applied and 3 to 4.5% in S. feltiae and control plots (Table 2).

Fig. 2.

Least square means (± 95% confidence intervals) for (A) adult and (B) larval thrips (Frankliniella bispinosa) per 10 strawberry flowers from research plots near Balm, Florida, sprayed 3, 7, and 16 Mar 2016 with Steinernema feltiae and 3 and 16 Mar 2016 with insecticides. Treatments were applied and reapplied when total thrips counts exceeded 5 per flower. Means in lower panel with the same letter are not significantly different (Tukey's HSD test, α = 0.05) (Experiment 2).

f02_102.jpg

Fig. 3.

Hourly temperature (left y-axis), rainfall, and relative humidity (right y-axis) 26 Feb to 25 Mar 2016 at Balm, Florida.

f03_102.jpg

WEATHER

Hourly weather data for Balm, Florida, USA, was downloaded from the Florida Automated Weather Network ( http://fawn.ifas.ufl.edu/). Daytime high temperatures typically ranged between 20 and nearly 30 °C, and nighttime temperatures ranged between about 10 to nearly 20 °C, with only a few nights falling below 10 °C (Fig. 3). Relative humidity was typically high at night (> 90%) and low during the day (40–50%) (Fig. 3). It was dry during both experiments; no rainfall occurred during Experiment 1 and only 2 rain events occurred during Experiment 2 (Fig. 3).

Discussion

Our results showed that sulfoxaflor controlled Florida flower thrips and reduced thrips-related fruit damage in Florida strawberry. However, S. feltiae was not effective at reducing or suppressing flower thrips or reducing strawberry damage. As research on management strategies for multiple species of thrips in Florida strawberry progresses, it will be important to rate the relative strengths of insecticides in order to develop optimal season-long rotations. Furthermore, factors affecting or limiting the efficacy and use of biological control organisms need to be explored to enable future research.

Spinetoram is an effective insecticide for control of multiple thrips species in a wide variety of crops, providing rapid-knockdown and sustained suppression of populations (Khaliq et al. 2014; Srivastava et al. 2014; Marasigan et al. 2016). Spinetoram is widely used in Florida strawberry and other horticultural crops, with the result that some F. occidentalis, but not F. bispinosa, populations have recently developed resistance (D. Sprague personal communication). Even though F. occidentalis was not widely reported by growers as a problem in the previous strawberry season, spinetoram is now also routinely used to control S. dorsalis early in the season, when strawberry plants first begin to flower. This study has shown that sulfoxaflor reduces flower thrips, reduces damage to strawberry, and does not adversely affect predatory insidious flower bugs, suggesting that it may be a suitable replacement for spinetoram. However, because the level of flower thrips reduction was not as great for sulfoxaflor as for spinetoram, sulfoxaflor may be better suited as a second application following spinetoram, in lieu of 2 successive spinetoram applications. The composition and order of insecticides is currently being evaluated in a season-long program for control of flower and chilli thrips in Florida strawberry crops.

Treatments of S. feltiae in strawberry plots resulted in no reduction of any thrips life stage or feeding damage. The most common factors limiting efficacy of foliar entomopathogenic nematode applications are susceptibility of the nematodes to ultraviolet light and desiccation (Gaugler & Boush 1978; Arthurs et al. 2004; Shapiro-Ilan et al. 2006). During these experiments, high temperatures and absence of rainfall likely caused significant desiccation and nematode mortality. An additional potential success-limiting factor is that the foliar environment may not provide sufficient support and leverage for S. feltiae to physically penetrate the host's spiracles (Eidt & Thurston 1995; Evans et al. 2015). Control of F. occidentalis with foliar applications of S. feltiae has been discussed (Shapiro-Ilan et al. 2006), although results have been variable (Arthurs & Heinz 2005; Beck et al. 2015). Only F. bispinosa was found in these experiments, and as these congenerics have similar life histories, we expected similar effects of S. feltiae. However, to our knowledge, S. feltiae has not been tested on F. bispinosa in a controlled environment, and subtle behavioral differences between these species may potentially alter their susceptibility to entomopathogenic nematodes. Entomopathogenic nematodes are virulent to soil-dwelling pupae of F. occidentalis (Chyzik et al. 1996; Ebssa et al. 2001; Premachandra et al. 2003), and some entomopathogenic nematodes in foliar applications likely land on the soil. However, in a raised-bed, plastic-mulched strawberry system, Frankliniella spp. are less likely to pupate in soil than on the plastic, under senescing leaves, or on living plant parts where entomopathogenic nematode survival, and thus infectivity rates, are likely to be low. Nematode species and strain may play a role in thrips suppression as well, as 2 strains of H. bacteriophora, for example, conferred very different levels of F. occidentalis control (Chyzik et al. 1996). The entomopathogenic nematode's foraging strategy and the location of the pupae in the soil likely play an important role in host infectivity dynamics (Kaya & Gaugler 1993; Chyzik et al. 1996).

Currently, sulfoxaflor (Closer®) is not registered for use in strawberry in the USA. Registration was cancelled late in 2015, but growers with product may still legally apply Closer®. Pending re-registration of Closer® in strawberry, as has occurred in other crops, growers will regain a valuable, additional tool for thrips insecticide rotation programs. Before entomopathogenic nematodes can be used for thrips management in Florida strawberry production, advancements in commercial delivery methods and application technologies will be necessary. For example, the thrips parasitic nematode, Thripinema nicklewoodi Siddiqui (Tylenchida: Allantonematidae), applied via infected thrips hosts rather than an aqueous suspension, has been shown to infect high numbers of F. occidentalis on foliage and persist for up to 9 generations (Arthurs & Heinz 2006). Overall, an improved integrated approach to thrips management in Florida strawberry is needed, with research focused on developing biological, chemical, and other methods that can be used to provide effective and economical control options.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Deborah Farr for assistance with field work. Funding was provided by BASF Corporation and Dow AgroSciences.

References Cited

1.

Arthurs S, Heinz KM, Prasifka JR. 2004. An analysis of using entomopathogenic nematodes against above-ground pests. Bulletin of Entomological Research 94: 297–306. Google Scholar

2.

Arthurs S, Heinz KM. 2006. Evaluation of the nematodes Steinernema feltiae and Thripinema nicklewoodi as biological control agents of western flower thrips Frankliniella occidentalis infesting chrysanthemum. Biocontrol Science and Technology 16: 141–155. Google Scholar

3.

Atakan E. 2011. Population densities and distributions of the western flower thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and its predatory bug, Orius niger (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) in strawberry. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 13: 638–644. Google Scholar

4.

Babcock JM, Gerwick CB, Huang JX, Loso MR, Nakamura G, Nolting SP, Rogers RB, Sparks TC, Thomas J, Watson GB, Zhu Y. 2011. Biological characterization of sulfoxaflor, a novel insecticide. Pest Management Science 67: 328–334. Google Scholar

5.

Baur ME, Kaya HK, Gaugler R, Tabashnik B. 1997. Effects of adjuvants on entomopathogenic nematode persistence and efficacy against Plutella xylostella. Biocontrol Science and Technology 7: 513–526. Google Scholar

6.

Beck B, Spanoghe P, Moens M, Pollet S, Temmerman F, Nuyttens D. 2015. Foliar applied entomopathogenic nematodes Steinernema feltiae are not suitable for controlling Thrips tabaci in leek. Bulletin of Insectology 68: 287–298. Google Scholar

7.

Broadbent AB, Olthof THA. 1995. Foliar application of Steinernema carpocapsae (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae) to control Liriomyza trifolii (Diptera: Agromyzidae) larvae in chrysanthemums. Biological Control 24: 431–435. Google Scholar

8.

Broadbent AB, Pree DJ. 1997. Resistance to insecticides in populations of Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) from greenhouses in the Niagara region of Ontario. Canadian Entomologist 129: 907–913. Google Scholar

9.

Buitenhuis R, Shipp JL. 2005. Efficacy of entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema feltiae (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae) as influenced by Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) developmental stage and host plant stage. Journal of Economic Entomology 98: 1480–1485. Google Scholar

10.

Childers CC. 1997. Feeding and oviposition injuries to plants, pp. 505–538 In Lewis T [ed.], Thrips as Crop Pests. CAB International, Cambridge, United Kingdom. Google Scholar

11.

Childers CC, Achor DS. 1991. Feeding and oviposition injury to flowers and developing floral buds of ‘Navel’ orange by Frankliniella bispinosa in Florida. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 84: 272–282. Google Scholar

12.

Chyzik R, Glazer I, Klein M. 1996. Virulence and efficacy of different entomopathogenic nematode species against western flower thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis). Phytoparasitica 24: 103–110. Google Scholar

13.

Cluever JD, Smith HA, Nagle CA, Funderburk JE, Frantz G. 2016. Effect of insecticide rotations on density and species composition of thrips (Thysanoptera) in Florida strawberry (Rosales: Rosaceae). Florida Entomologist 99: 203–209. Google Scholar

14.

Coll M, Sulochana S, Shouster I, Nenner Y, Steinberg S. 2006. Decision-making tools for Frankliniella occidentalis management in strawberry: consideration of target markets. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 122: 59–67. Google Scholar

15.

Cuthbertson AGS, North JP, Walters KFA. 2005. Effect of temperature and hot plant leaf morphology on the efficacy of two entomopathogenic biocontrol agents of Thrips palmi (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 95: 321–327. Google Scholar

16.

Dickey AM, Kumar V, Hoddle MS, Funderburk JE, Morgan K, Jara-Cavieres A, Shatters RG, Osborne LS, McKenzie CL. 2015. The Scirtothrips dorsalis species complex: endemism and invasions in a global pest. PLOS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123747. Google Scholar

17.

Ebssa L, Borgemeister C, Berndt O, Poehling H-M. 2001. Efficacy of entomopathogenic nematodes against soil-dwelling life stage of western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 78: 119–127. Google Scholar

18.

Eidt DC, Thurston GS. 1995. Physical deterrents to infection by entomopathogenic nematodes in wireworms (Coleoptera, Elateridae) and other soil insects. Canadian Entomologist 127: 423–429. Google Scholar

19.

Evans BG, Jordan KS, Brownbridge M, Hallett RHH. 2015. Effect of temperature and host life stage on efficacy of soil entomopathogens against the swede midge (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 108: 473–483. Google Scholar

20.

FAWN — Florida Automated Weather Network. Archived monthly average temperature. UF/IFAS Extension.  https://fawn.ifas.ufl.edu/data/reports/?res1501701462215  Google Scholar

21.

Gaugler R, Boush GM. 1978. Effects of ultraviolet radiation and sunlight on the entomogenous nematode Neoaplectana carpocapsae. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 32: 291–296. Google Scholar

22.

Gothro PW. 2000. Application of beneficial nematodes for control of fungus gnats, pp. 13–16 In Gothro PW [ed.], Proceedings of Beneficial Nematode Workshop. Application in Greenhouse, Nursery and Small-Fruit Operations. Integrated Plant Protection Center, Corvallis, Oregon, USA. Google Scholar

23.

Haviland DR, Rill SM. 2015. Citrus thrips control in southern highbush blueberries in California, 2014. Arthropod Management Tests 40: C11. Google Scholar

24.

Immaraju, JA, Paine TD, Bethke JA, Robb KL, Newman JP. 1992. Western flower thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) resistance to insecticides in coastal California greenhouses. Journal of Economic Entomology 85: 9–14. Google Scholar

25.

Kaya H, Gaugler R. 1993. Entomopathogenic nematodes. Annual Review of Entomology 38: 181–206. Google Scholar

26.

Khaliq A, Khan AA, Afzal M, Tahir HM, Raza AM, Khan AM. 2014. Field evaluation of selected botanicals and commercial synthetic insecticides against Thrips tabaci Lindeman (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) populations and predators in onion field plots. Crop Protection 62: 10–15. Google Scholar

27.

Kirk WDJ, Terry LI. 2003. The spread of the western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 5: 301–310. Google Scholar

28.

Marasigan K, Toews M, Kemerait Jr R, Abney MR, Culbreath A, Srinivasan R. 2016. Evaluation of alternative to carbamate and organophosphate insecticides against thrips and tomato spotted wilt virus in peanut production. Journal of Economic Entomology 109: 544–557. Google Scholar

29.

Natwick ET, Lopez MI. 2014. Insecticide efficacy against thrips in iceberg lettuce, 2013. Arthropod Management Tests 39: E32. Google Scholar

30.

Olthof THA, Broadbent AB. 1992. Evaluation of steinernematid nematodes for control of a leafminer, Liriomyza trifolii, in greenhouse chrysanthemums. Journal of Nematology 24: 612. Google Scholar

31.

Premachandra DWTS, Borgemeister C, Berndt O, Ehlers R-U, Poehling H-M. 2003. Laboratory bioassays of virulence of entomopathogenic nematodes against soil-inhabiting stages of Frankliniella occidentalis Pergande (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Nematology 5: 539–547. Google Scholar

32.

Reitz SR, Yearby EL, Funderburk JE, Stavisky J, Momol MT, Olson SM. 2003. Integrated management tactics for Frankliniella thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in field-grown pepper. Journal of Economic Entomology 96: 1201–1214. Google Scholar

33.

Rhodes EM, Liburd OE. 2011. Flower thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) dispersal from alternate hosts into southern highbush blueberry (Ericales: Ericaceae) plantings. Florida Entomologist 94: 311–320. Google Scholar

34.

SAS. 2015. JMP® Pro 12.0.1. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA. Google Scholar

35.

Seal DR. 2012. Controlling melon thrips on eggplants, 2011. Arthropod Management Tests 37: E24. Google Scholar

36.

Shapiro-Ilan DI, Gouge DH, Piggott SJ, Patterson Fife J. 2006. Application technology and environmental considerations for use of entomopathogenic nematodes in biological control. Biological Control 38: 124–133. Google Scholar

37.

Shipp JL, Wang K, Binns MR. 2000. Economic injury levels of western flower thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on greenhouse cucumber. Journal of Economic Entomology 93: 1732–1740. Google Scholar

38.

Sparks TC, Watson GB, Loso MR, Geng C, Babcock JM, Thomas JD. 2013. Sulfoxaflor and the sulfoximine insecticides: chemistry, mode of action and basis for efficacy on resistant insects. Pesticide Biochemistry Physiology 107: 1–7. Google Scholar

39.

Srivastava M, Funderburk J, Olson S, Demirozer O, Reitz S. 2014. Impacts on natural enemies and competitor thrips of insecticide against the western flower thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in fruiting vegetables. Florida Entomologist 97: 337–348. Google Scholar

40.

Steiner MY, Goodwin S. 2005. Management of thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in Australian strawberry crops: within-plant distribution characteristics and action thresholds. Australian Journal of Entomology 44: 175–185. Google Scholar

41.

Van Steenwyk RA, Bisabri B, Wong BJ, Poliakon RA. 2016. Insecticidal control of citrus thrips in citrus, 2015. Arthropod Management Tests. https://doi.org/10.193/amt/tsw056 Google Scholar

42.

Wardlow LR, Piggott S, Goldsworthy R. 2001. Foliar application of Steinernema feltiae for the control of flower thrips. Mededelingen Faculteit Landbouwkundige en Toegepast Biologishce Wetenschappen Universiteit Gent 66: 285–291. Google Scholar

43.

Watson GB, Loso MR, Babcock JM, Hasler JM, Letherer TJ, Young CD, Zhu Y, Casida JE, Sparks TC. 2011. Novel nicotinic action of the sulfoximine insecticide sulfoxaflor. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 41: 432–439. Google Scholar

44.

Whidden A. 2004. From your extension agent. Berry/Vegetable Times (Apr/May). University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences.  http://gcrec.ifas.ufl.edu/berry-vegetable-times-newsletter (last accessed 12 Jul 2017) Google Scholar

45.

Williams EC, Walters KFA. 2000. Foliar application of the entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema feltiae against leafminers on vegetables. Biocontrol Science and Technology 10: 61–70. Google Scholar
Justin M. Renkema, Braden Evans, and Shashan Devkota "Management of Flower Thrips in Florida Strawberries with Steinernema feltiae (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae) and the Insecticide Sulfoxaflor," Florida Entomologist 101(1), 102-108, (1 March 2018). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.101.0118
Published: 1 March 2018
KEYWORDS
Closer
Florida flower thrips
Frankliniella bispinosa
Nemasys
Radiant
spinetoram
trips de las flores de Florida
Back to Top