Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 March 2018 Occurrence of Coccinellids that Prey on Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae) on Euphorbia heterophylla (Euphorbiaceae) and Chamaecrista fasciculata (Fabaceae) in a South Florida Residential Area
Joseph M. Patt
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Adding plant-based nutritional resources to a landscape may help to recruit and retain predaceous and parasitic arthropods. As a first step in determining whether the addition of nectary plants can increase the abundance and diversity of biocontrol agents of Diaphorina citri and psyllid suppression in urban and unmanaged landscapes in southern Florida, the occurrence of coccinellids was recorded on a native poinsettia, Euphorbia heterophylla (L.) and partridge pea, Chamaecrista fasciculata (Michx.) Greene, a native legume. Thirteen coccinellid species consisting of a total of 663 specimens were collected over the course of the 8-mo long sampling period. A total of 464 specimens comprising 12 species were collected from E. heterophylla from Jun to Oct, with 3 species, Coelophora inequalis, Cryptolaemus montrouzieri, Harmonia axyridis, comprising the majority of species collected. A total of 199 specimens comprising 6 species were collected from C. fasciculata from Sep to Feb. Nearly 80% of the specimens collected from C. fasciculata were C. montrouzieri.

Asian citrus psyllid (ACP), Diaphorina citri (Kuwayama) (Hemiptera: Liviidae), the vector of the causal agent responsible for citrus greening disease or huanglongbing (HLB), can thrive in urban areas, abandoned citrus groves, and other areas that are not managed to control the psyllid (Tsai et al. 2002; Halbert & Manjunath 2004; Chong et al. 2011; Kondo et al. 2015). Psyllids in these unmanaged areas often occur on the widespread ornamental shrub, orange jasmine (Murraya paniculata (L.) Jacq. [Rutaceae]), as well as citrus trees; from there they can readily disperse to nearby commercial groves and transmit HLB (Tiwari et al. 2010; Lewis-Rosenblum et al. 2015). Despite the significant threat these psyllids pose to the citrus industry, there are few practical options available for managing D. citri in urban and unmanaged areas. Biological control has long been thought to be the most promising means of suppressing D. citri in urban and unmanaged areas because the psyllids are vulnerable to attack by predaceous arthropods such as lady beetles, lacewings, and spiders, as well as by introduced parasitoids such as Tamarixia radiata (Waterston) (Hemiptera: Eulophidae) (Michaud 2001, 2002; Michaud & Olsen 2004; Pluke et al. 2005; Qureshi & Stansly 2009; Lozano Contreras & Jasso Argumendo 2012; Hall et al. 2013; Qureshi et al. 2014; Kondo et al. 2015).

Studies have shown that, in the absence of chemical spray controls, generalist predators can be relatively abundant in commercial citrus groves and can negatively impact D. citri populations (Michaud 2001, 2002; Michaud & Olsen 2004; Pluke et al. 2005; Qureshi & Stansly 2009; Qureshi et al. 2014). While generalist predators have the potential to reduce D. citri populations in urban and unmanaged areas, their frequency and distribution is largely unknown and their impact on D. citri populations has been reported to be uneven. For example, Tsai et al. (2002) saw very little evidence of generalist predator occurrence while documenting D. citri population dynamics on orange jasmine and citrus in south Florida. Chong et al. (2011) reported that the most common predators associated with orange jasmine hedges in south Florida were the coccinellids Harmonia axyridis (Pallas) and Chilocorus stigma (Say) (both Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) but these species also had low observed frequencies of occurrence.

Adding plant-based nutritional resources to a landscape may help to recruit and retain predaceous and parasitic arthropods (Landis et al. 2000; Wäckers et al. 2005; Lundgren 2009; Gurr et al. 2017). This is because, in addition to prey or hosts, many natural enemy taxa also rely on nectar and pollen at some point during their life cycles (Jervis et al. 1993; Wäckers et al. 2005; Lundgren 2009). Plant-based nutrients can be crucial to natural enemies during transit between locations, during periods of prey scarcity, and are often necessary for gamete maturation (Wäckers et al. 2005; Lundgren 2009). Because most natural enemies do not possess mouthparts that enable them to probe into floral tubes, they obtain nectar primarily from plant species with extrafloral nectaries or whose flowers have relatively exposed nectaries (Patt et al. 1997; Wäckers 2004). Many of the ornamental plant species commonly grown in southern Florida cannot provide nectar or pollen to D. citri natural enemies because they have been bred to have multiple petals that obscure or lack nectaries altogether, or have tubular flowers that prevent natural enemies from accessing the nectaries. It is therefore important to select ‘nectary plants’ that have either extrafloral nectaries or flowers whose nectaries are morphologically accessible to natural enemies (Patt et al. 1997; Sivinski et al. 2011; Géneau et al. 2012; Tschumi et al. 2014; Wäckers & van Rijn 2012).

As a first step in determining whether the addition of nectary plants might increase the abundance and diversity of biocontrol agents of D. citri and thus augment psyllid suppression in urban and unmanaged landscapes in southern Florida, the occurrence of coccinellids was recorded on two nectary plants grown in a residential area. Lady beetles were chosen as a focal taxon because they are among the most important predators of ACP (Michaud 2001, 2002; Michaud & Olsen 2004; Pluke et al. 2005; Qureshi & Stansly 2009; Lozano Contreras & Jasso Argumendo 2012; Qureshi et al. 2014; Kondo et al. 2015).

The two nectary plant species chosen for observation were partridge pea, Chamaecrista fasciculata (Michx.) Greene (Fabaceae), a native legume, and a native poinsettia, Euphorbia heterophylla (L.) (Euphorbiaceae). Chamaecrista fasciculata is an annual that tolerates nutrient-poor soils, withstands drought, and readily re-seeds (Houck & Row 2006). Commonly grown as an ornamental, its numerous and bright yellow flowers make it a popular choice for use in native gardens. It is also planted to support gamebirds, which feed on the seeds (Martin et al. 1951), and is a recognized wildlife conservation plant. Chamaecrista fasciculata has a single extrafloral nectary located at the base of the rachis of each compound leaf (Fig. 1A). Euphorbia heterophylla has numerous protruding nectaries within each inflorescence (Fig. 1B). Whereas E. heterophylla can be a serious annual weed of field crops such as soybeans and cowpeas (Wilson 1981), its nectary architecture and quick growth habit made it a useful species to investigate as a nectary plant in an urban setting.

Fig. 1.

Nectary plants monitored for presence of coccinellids. (A) Chamaecrista fascisculata foliage. (B) Euphorbia heterophylla with adult Harmonia axyridis. Arrows show nectaries.

f01_131.jpg

The studies were conducted in a residential neighborhood with mature live oak trees in Fort Pierce, Florida, USA, from Jun 2016 to Feb 2017. Fort Pierce has a subtropical climate and is located approximately 35 km southeast of the Indian River citrus growing region. The plants were grown in planters made from 79.5 L plastic storage boxes filled with ca. 60 L of commercial peat-based potting soil (Farfard 4P Mix, Sungro Horticulture Distribution, Inc., Agawam, Massachusetts, USA). Prior to filling with soil, the bottoms of the boxes were drilled to create 8 drainage holes (1.5 cm diam). Euphorbia heterophylla seeds were obtained by hand collection from plants growing in the study locality; C. fasciculata were obtained from a regional commercial seed supplier (Hancock Seed Company, Dade City, Florida, USA). The seeds were sown in 7.6 cm square pots and the seedlings transplanted to the planters when they had 4-6 true leaves. To provide each planter with equivalent amounts of plant mass when each species had reached maturity, each planter received either 15 E. heterophylla seedlings or 5 C. fasciculata seedlings. After transplanting, each planter was fertilized with ca. 40 g of 15-9-12 NPK plus micronutrients timed-release fertilizer (Osmocote, The Scotts Company, Maryville, Ohio, USA) and then watered as needed. Euphorbia heterophylla was grown in 32 planters and monitored for the presence of coccinellids from 1 Jun to 15 Oct 2016. Since E. heterophylla grows minimally in the cooler months of the year in south Florida, coccinellid monitoring was conducted on C. fasciculata from 28 Sep 2016 to 21 Feb 2017 in 8 planters. Sampling was terminated when the nectary plants began to senesce.

Coccinellid species diversity and abundance were determined from captures of adults made on (13.5 cm W × 20 cm H) yellow sticky card traps (Alpha Scents, West Linn, Oregon, USA). The sticky card traps were attached to bamboo stakes (100–120 cm) with twist ties and positioned so that they were level with the top of the nectary plant canopy. The bamboo stakes were inserted into the potting soil for stability. Four traps were placed at equidistant intervals across the length of the planter arrays. The traps were replaced weekly and returned to the lab for examination.

Thirteen coccinellid species consisting of a total of 663 specimens were collected over the course of the 8-mo sampling period (Table 1). A total of 464 specimens comprising 12 species were collected from E. heterophylla. Three species comprised the majority of species collected: Coelophora inequalis (F.) (38.6% of total specimens), Cryptolaemus montrouzieri (Mulsant), (30.2% of total specimens), and Harmonia axyridis (Pallas) (24.1% of total specimens) (all Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). A total of 199 specimens comprising 6 species were collected from C. fasciculata. Nearly 80% of the specimens collected from C. fasciculata were C. montrouzieri, Harmonia axyridis, Azya orbigera (Mulsant) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), and C. inaequlis comprised 12% of the specimens collected. Since sampling on this plant occurred only during the cooler periods of the yr, further studies are needed to determine the abundance and species composition of coccinellids that might be associated with C. fasciculata during the warmer months.

Eleven of the 13 species collected, comprising 97.5% of all specimens captured, are known to feed on D. citri (Table 1). These results indicate that E. heterophylla and C. fasciculata can be used to provide nourishment for coccinellids that prey upon D. citri in residential and urban areas and that insectary plants can perform in this capacity across seasons. Interestingly, the nectaries of E. heterophylla were observed to continue to secrete nectar during fruit maturation, perhaps taking on the function of an extra-floral nectary to nourish natural enemies of fruit and seed herbivores. Fruit maturation was sequential within E. heterophylla, so the nectaries in a single inflorescence-infructescence remained active for a period lasting many weeks. Chamaecrista fasciculata grew vigorously during most of the sampling period. Because polistine wasps were frequently observed foraging on the extra-floral nectaries over the course of the trapping period, it is assumed that the extra-floral nectaries remained active during the duration of the study period.

A number of other insectary plant species will be monitored in anticipated studies to determine their utility with respect to attracting coccinellids and other natural enemies of D. citri, such as lacewings and hoverflies, in urban and other kinds of unmanaged landscapes. These include crown-of-thorns (Euphorbia milii) (des Moulins) [Euphorbiaceae]), flowering buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum (Moench) [Polygonaceae]), and alyssum (Lobularia maritima ([L.] Desvaux) [Brassicaceae]). Natural enemies have been observed foraging on and benefitting from the flowers on these plants (Baggen & Gurr 1998; Chaney 1998; Wäckers & van Rijn 2012; Brennan 2013; Foti et al. 2017; Patt & Rohrig 2017). Since the establishment of T. radiata has both been erratic and unpredictable (Hall & Rohrig 2015; Kistner et al. 2016), it would be useful to know whether the inclusion of nectary plants in the target landscape would benefit this parasitoid. Ultimately we will need to determine whether insectary plant inclusion will result in an increase in natural enemy abundance and diversity and a concomitant reduction in D. citri populations in nearby host plants.

Table 1.

Occurrence of coccinellid species on inflorescences of Euphorbia heterophylla and Chamaecrista fasciculata grown in a residential area in south Florida.

t01_131.gif

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful to A. Tarshis Moreno and F. Manthey for assistance with field collection, trap analysis, and data compilation, and thanks Drs. Paul Robbins and Jawwad Qureshi and an anonymous reviewer for reviewing and improving the manuscript. Funding for this research was provided by the United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the United States Department of Agriculture for its use.

References Cited

1.

Baggen LR, Gurr GM. 1998. The influence of food on Copidosoma koehleri (Hymentoptera: Encryritidae), and the use of flowering plants as a habitat man-agement tool to enhance biological control of potato moth, Phthorimaea operculella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Biological Control 11: 9–17. Google Scholar

2.

Brennan EB. 2013. Agronomic aspects of strip intercropping lettuce with alyssum for biological control of aphids. Biological Control 65: 302–311. Google Scholar

3.

Chaney WE. 1998. Biological control of aphids in lettuce using in-field insectaries, pp. 73–83 In Pickett CH, Bugg RL [eds.], Enhancing Biological Control: Habitat Management to Promote Natural Enemies of Arthropod Pests. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA. Google Scholar

4.

Chong J-H, Roda AL, Mannion CM. 2011. Density and natural enemies of the Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) in the residential landscape of southern Florida. Journal of Agricultural and Urban Entomology 27: 33–49. Google Scholar

5.

Foti MC, Rostás M, Peri E, Park KC, Slimani T, Wratten SD, Colazza SD. 2017. Chemical ecology meets conservation biological control: identifying plant volatiles as predictors of floral resource suitability for an egg parasitoid of stink bugs. Journal of Pest Science 90: 299–310. Google Scholar

6.

Géneau CE, Wäckers FL, Luka H, Daniel C, Balmer O. 2012. Selective flowers to enhance biological control of cabbage pests by parasitoids. Basic and Applied Ecology 13: 85–93. Google Scholar

7.

Gurr G, Wratten SD, Landis D, Minsheng Y. 2017. Habitat management to suppress pest populations: progress and prospects. Annual Review of Entomology 62: 91–109. Google Scholar

8.

Halbert S, Manjunath KL. 2004. Asian citrus psyllids (Sternorrhyncha: Psyllidae) and greening disease of citrus; a literature review and assessment of risk in Florida. Florida Entomologist 87: 330–353. Google Scholar

9.

Hall DG, Richardson ML, Ammar E-D, Halbert SE. 2013. Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri, vector of citrus huanglongbing disease. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 146: 207–223. Google Scholar

10.

Hall DG, Rohrig E. 2015. Bionomics of Asian citrus psyllid (Hemiptera: Liviidae) associated with orange jasmine hedges in southeast central Florida, with special reference to biological control by Tamarixia radiata. Journal of Economic Entomology 108: 1198–1207. Google Scholar

11.

Houck MJ, Row JM. 2006. Plant Guide for Partridge Pea, Chamaecrista fasciculata (Michx.) Greene. USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service.  https://plants.usda.gov/plantguide/pdf/pg_chfa2.pdf  Google Scholar

12.

Jervis MA, Kidd NAC, Fitton MG, Huddleston T, Dawah HA. 1993. Flower-visiting by hymenopteran parasitoids. Journal of Natural History 27: 67–105. Google Scholar

13.

Kistner EJ, Amrich R, Castillo M, Strode V, Hoddle MS. 2016. Phenology of Asian citrus psyllid (Hemiptera: Liviidae), with special reference to biological control by Tamarixia radiata, in the residential landscape of southern California. Journal of Economic Entomology 109: 1047–1057. Google Scholar

14.

Kondo T, González FG, Tauber C, Guzmán Sarmiento YC, Vinasco Mondragon AF. 2015. A checklist of natural enemies of Diaphorina citri Kuyama (Hemiptera: Liviidae) in the department of Valle del Cauca, Columbia and the world. Insecta Mundi Paper 0457: 1–14. Google Scholar

15.

Landis DA, Wratten SD, Gurr GM. 2000. Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture. Annual Review of Entomology 45: 175–201. Google Scholar

16.

Lewis-Rosenblum H, Martini X, Tiwari S, Stelinski LL. 2015. Season movement patterns and long-range dispersal of Asian citrus psyllid in Florida citrus. Journal of Economic Entomology 108: 3–10. Google Scholar

17.

Lozano Contreras MG, Jasso Argumedo J. 2012. Identificación de enemigos naturales de Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) en el Estado de Yucatán, Mexico. Fitosanidad 16: 5–11. Google Scholar

18.

Lundgren JG. 2009. Relationships of Natural Enemies and Non-prey Foods. Springer Science and Business Media BV, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Google Scholar

19.

Martin AC, Zim HS, Nelson AL. 1951. American Wildlife & Plants. A Guide to Wildlife Food Habits. Dover Publications, Inc., New York, USA. Google Scholar

20.

Michaud JP. 2001. Numerical response of Olla v-nigrum (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) to infestations of Asian citrus psyllid (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) in Florida. Florida Entomologist 84: 608–612. Google Scholar

21.

Michaud JP. 2002. Biological control of Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae), in Florida: a preliminary report. Entomological News, Philadelphia 113: 216–222. Google Scholar

22.

Michaud JP. 2004. Natural mortality of Asian citrus psyllid (Homoptera: Psyllidae) in central Florida. Biological Control 29: 260–269. Google Scholar

23.

Michaud JP, Olsen LE. 2004. Suitability of Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri, as prey for ladybeetles. BioControl 49: 417–431. Google Scholar

24.

Patt JM, Hamilton GC, Lashomb JH. 1997. Foraging success of parasitoid wasps on flowers: interplay of insect morphology, floral architecture and searching behavior. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 83: 21–30. Google Scholar

25.

Patt JM, Rohrig E. 2017. Laboratory evaluations of the foraging success of Tamarixia radiata (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) on flowers and extra-floral nectaries: potential use of nectar plants for conservation biological control of Asian citrus psyllid (Hemiptera: Liviidae). Florida Entomologist 100: 149–156. Google Scholar

26.

Pluke RWH, Escribano A, Michaud JP, Stansly PA. 2005. Potential impact of lady beetles on Diaphorina citri (Homoptera: Psyllidae) in Puerto Rico. 2005. Florida Entomologist 88: 123–128. Google Scholar

27.

Qureshi JA, Stansly PA. 2009. Exclusion techniques reveal significant biotic mortality suffered by Asian citrus psyllid Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) in Florida citrus. Biological Control 50: 129–136. Google Scholar

28.

Qureshi JA, Kostyk BC, Stansly PA. 2014. Insecticidal suppression of Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae), vector of Huanglongbing pathogens. PLoS ONE 9: e112331. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112331. Google Scholar

29.

Sivinski J, Wahl D, Holler T, Al Dobai S, Sivinski R. 2011. Conserving natural enemies with flowering plants: estimating floral attractiveness to parasitic Hymenoptera and attraction's relationship to flower and plant morphology. Biological Control 58: 208–214. Google Scholar

30.

Tiwari S, Lewis-Rosenblum H, Pelz-Stelinski K, Stelinski L. 2010. Incidence of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus infection in abandoned citrus occurring in proximity to commercially managed groves. Journal of Economic Entomology 103: 1972–1978. Google Scholar

31.

Tsai JH, Wang J-J, Liu Y-H. 2002. Seasonal abundance of the Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri (Homoptera: Psyllidae), in southern Florida. Florida Entomologist 85: 446–451. Google Scholar

32.

Tschumi M, Albrecht M, Entling MH, Jacot K. 2014. Targeted flower strips effectively promote natural enemies of aphids. IOBC-WPRS Bulletin 100: 131–135. Google Scholar

33.

Wäckers FL. 2004. Assessing the suitability of flowering herbs as parasitoid food sources: flower attractiveness and nectar accessibility. Biological Control 29: 307–314. Google Scholar

34.

Wäckers FL, van Rijn PCJ, Bruin J. 2005. Plant-provided Food for Carnivorous Insects: A Protective Mutualism and Its Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom. Google Scholar

35.

Wäckers FL, van Rijn PCJ. 2012. Pick and mix: selecting flowering plants to meet the requirements of target biological control insects, pp. 140–165 In Gurr GM, Wratten SD, Snyder WE, Read DMY [eds] Biodiversity and Insect Pests: Key Issues for Sustainable Management. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Hoboken, New Jersey, USA. Google Scholar

36.

Wilson AK. 1981. Euphorbia heterophylla: a review of distribution, importance, and control. Tropical Pest Management 27: 32–38 Google Scholar
Joseph M. Patt "Occurrence of Coccinellids that Prey on Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae) on Euphorbia heterophylla (Euphorbiaceae) and Chamaecrista fasciculata (Fabaceae) in a South Florida Residential Area," Florida Entomologist 101(1), 131-134, (1 March 2018). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.101.0124
Published: 1 March 2018
KEYWORDS
Coccinellidae
conservation biological control
Control biológical de la conservación
extra-floral nectary
floral resources
nectar
néctar
Back to Top