Translator Disclaimer
1 December 2018 Chironomidae (Insecta: Diptera) of Ecuadorian Highaltitude Streams: A Survey and Illustrated Key
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Chironomidae (Diptera) are among the most diverse and widespread aquatic insects, with roughly 5,500 described species inhabiting an enormous variety of aquatic ecosystems, ranging from moist soils to lakes and rivers, and even marine ecosystems. Despite its ubiquity, the group remains underrepresented in studies addressing aquatic insect assemblages of high-altitude systems, either glacier-fed or non-glacial, particularly in South America. Glacier-fed streams possibly are one of the harshest ecosystems in nature, and present a distinct downstream pattern in species distribution and diversity away from the constraining influence of the glacier. In this context, the goal of our study was to provide data on the chironomid fauna of glacier-fed streams, together with neighboring non-glacial streams in Ecuador, in order to contribute to the overall knowledge of tropical fauna in high Andean regions. Also, we sought to provide an identification key and photography material for future studies. Collections of non-biting midges were made in Ecuador during Jan 2008. In total, 1,412 specimens belonging to 16 genera and at least 23 species within the subfamilies Chironominae (3 taxa), Diamesinae (3 taxa), Podonominae (3 taxa), Orthocladiinae (13 taxa), and Tanypodinae (1 taxon) were found. The subfamilies Podonominae and Orthocladiinae predominated in terms of abundance. Parochlus was the most widespread genus of Chironomidae, while Cricotopus was the most diverse. This study contributes to the knowledge of the chironomid fauna in the high-altitude streams in Ecuador, and hopefully will motivate further studies in the area.

Non-biting midges (Insecta: Diptera: Chironomidae) are true flies, and the most widely distributed free-living holometabolous insects (Ferrington 2008). Chironomids inhabit an enormous variety of aquatic ecosystems, ranging from moist soils to pools in tree-holes, and from lowoxygen lake sediments to fast-flowing mountain streams (Ferrington et al. 2008). The adult life stage of chironomids is ephemeral, and most of the lifespan is spent in the larval stage (Thienemann 1954; Tokeshi 1995). The countless species and habitat diversity makes this family a valuable indicator species for lentic and lotic aquatic ecosystems, but also they are particularly well suited for phylogenetic and biogeographical investigations (Silva & Ekrem 2016). Nevertheless, in order to obtain the most biologically informative data, it is fundamental to identify taxa to species, because within a single genus, species may respond in a distinct manner to environmental changes (Lenat & Resh 2001). Generally, the lack of descriptions and keys to a local fauna precludes species determination, or workers choose to overlook the chironomids in favor of groups (e.g., Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera) that are more limited in number and diversity (Spies et al. 2009).

Approximately 900 chironomid species are recognized from the Neotropical region (Martin Spies, personal communication). This number has been increasing in recent years thanks to intense taxonomic work being conducted, particularly in Brazil and Argentina (e.g., Oliveira et al. 2013; Trivinho-Strixino et al. 2013, 2015; Andersen & Pinho 2014; Silva et al. 2014a, b; Andersen et al. 2015; Silva & Wiedenbrug 2015; Siri et al. 2015; Parise & Pinho 2016; Silva & Oliveira 2016; Silva & Ferrington 2018). When it comes to Ecuador, the chironomid fauna and its diversity remain poorly known (e.g., Brundin, 1966; Roback & Coffman 1983; Prat et al. 2010, 2011), most likely due to the insufficient number of scientists working with this group in the region.

High-altitude streams, especially those fed by glaciers, are possibly one of the harshest ecosystems in nature, and therefore typically present a distinct spatial pattern in the distribution of diversity and species assemblages downstream and away from the constraining influence of the glacier (Sæther 1968; Steffan 1971). Glacier-fed streams are characterized by a unique fluctuation pattern in discharge that is significantly different in temperate/arctic and tropical/equatorial glacierfed streams (Milner & Petts 1994; Jacobsen et al. 2010). Although the ecology (see Britain & Milner 2001) and fauna (e.g., Füreder et al. 2000; Lods-Crozet et al. 2002; Robinson et al. 2001; Lencioni et al. 2002) of temperate glacier-fed streams have been studied intensely, only a few studies were dedicated to the fauna of these ecosystems in the tropics (Jacobsen et al. 2010; Kuhn et al. 2011). In this context, the goal of our study was to provide data on the chironomid fauna of Ecuadorian high-altitude streams, both glacier-fed and non-glacial, in order to contribute to the overall knowledge of the tropical fauna in high-elevation Andean regions. Additionally, we also provide an identification key along with a photography catalogue of the chironomid larvae recorded in this study.

Materials and Methods

SITE DESCRIPTION

The Río Antisana is a headwater of the River Napo, a main tributary of the upper Amazon River. It originates at an altitude of 4,730 masl from the ‘Crespo’ glacier on Mount Antisana in the eastern Cordillera of the Andes of Ecuador (0.460000°S, 78.150000°W). Predominant soil types are hydrandepts and dystrandepts (both Andosols) with high volcanic ash content, low density and high phosphorous binding capacity (Buringh 1979). Air temperature, humidity, and solar radiation do not vary systematically during the year, whereas precipitation, cloud cover, and wind speed present more seasonal variability in the study region (Cadier et al. 2007). Mean annual precipitation is about 800 mm, falling mainly as snow and hail (Maisincho et al. 2007). Air temperature varies from about 3.7 °C at the lowest site to 1.3 °C at the upper site (Maisincho et al. 2007). The vegetation of the lower part of the study area is covered by low ‘páramo,’ a moorland type of vegetation with scattered bushes typical of the northern Andes. Above about 4,600 masl, vegetation is characterized as sporadic tufts of grasses and cushion plants. For more information on the study area, see Jacobsen et al. (2010).

COLLECTION AND IDENTIFICATION

Collections were made from a total of 17 sites in Jan 2008, 10 glacially influenced and 7 without glacial influence. The glacier-fed sites were located along a 4.3 km stretch of 3 streams originating side-byside from 3 glaciers on Antisana (Fig. 1). On each of these streams, 3 sites were selected at varying distance from the glacier snout, and situated between 4,051 and 4,835 masl. At each site, 5 quantitative Surber samples (0.05 m2, mesh size 200 μm) were collected randomly from pebble/cobble substratum in riffle⁄run habitats. In addition, a qualitative search was made for about 20 to 30 min in other microhabitats. The 5 non-glacial streams (7 sites, 3,925–4,105 masl) were sampled using only qualitative sampling (kicking technique). All samples were field-preserved using 70% ethanol. At each site, basic environmental variables were measured (Table 1). For detailed description of the methods used, see Kuhn et al. (2011). In the laboratory, the samples were rinsed through a 200 μm sieve, and larvae and pupae of Chironomidae were sorted under a stereoscopic microscope at 10× magnification, dehydrated in 96 and 99% ethanol, and slide-mounted in Euparal (ASCO Laboratories, Manchester, England) for species identification. Morphological identification was made based on the keys of Ruiz-Moreno et al. (2000), Epler (2001), Prat et al. (2011), Andersen et al. (2013), Trivinho-Strixino (2014), and, occasionally, original descriptions. Voucher specimens are deposited in the Biology Department, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Results

A total of 1,412 specimens were collected, and identified as 23 species (Table 2) belonging to 16 genera and 5 subfamilies: Orthocladiinae (13 taxa), Chironominae (3 taxa), Diamesinae (3 taxa), Podonominae (3 taxa), and Tanypodinae (1 taxon). Larvae of the subfamilies Orthocladiinae and Podonominae highly predominated in terms of abundance, comprising 60 and 39% of the total abundance, respectively. Chironominae were sampled seldomly and always in small numbers. Only 1 genus was recorded for Tanypodinae, Pentaneura Phillippi. Parochlus Enderlein was the most widespread genus of Chironomidae, while Cricotopus van der Wulp was the most diverse. In total, 21 taxa were recorded in glacier-fed streams, and 13 in non-glacial streams. Eight taxa occurred exclusively in glacier-fed streams, 1 taxon was exclusive for non-glacier streams, Orthocladius (Euo.) sp.; however, it was common in non-glacial streams. Parochlus sp. B and Podonomus Phillippi were typical for glacially influenced streams, and were rarely collected or not collected in the streams without glacial influence.

Key to subfamilies (only subfamilies recorded in the study are included)

1. Antenna retractile into the head capsule, prementum with well-developed ligula (Fig. 23) Tanypodinae

1.— Antenna not retractile, ligula never developed 2

2. Ventral part of mentum laterally developed into ventromental plates of different shape, usually striate and never with beard Chironominae

2.— Ventromental plates, if developed, never striated and sometimes with beard beneath 3

3. Procerci obvious, minimum 3× as long as wide, usually much longer (8–10×). Premandibles absent (Figs. 79) Podonominae

3.— Procerci less than 3× as long as wide, usually much less or reduced. Premandibles present 4

4. Prementum with 3 dense brushes of hair-like processes. Usually with distinctive ‘collar’ (occipital margin of the head). Mentum either very wide, with 2 narrow medium teeth and > 8 lateral teeth of similar size (Figs. 5–6), or with 1 very broad median tooth and 5 laterals (Fig. 4). Head dark brown, body ‘fleshy’ Diamesinae (Heptagyiini)

4.— Prementum with lamellae rather than brushes. Mentum usually narrower, with at most 3 median teeth. Body of various coloration Orthocladiinae

Notes: The only Tanypodinae recorded in the studied streams was Pentaneura sp. (Fig. 23). There was 1 specimen in the Surber samples of the Glacier stream 14, site 3 (farthest from the glacier terminus), and it is apparently very rare in the region.

Fig. 1.

Map of the Antisana stream system. For site codes see Tables 1 and 2. Glaciated area is marked with grey. Sites 1 to 10 are glaciated, sites 11 to 17 are non-glacial.

f01_663.jpg

Subfamily Chironominae

1. Antennae long, placed on pedestals (Fig. 3) Tanytarsini

1.— Antenna shorter, growing directly from head (Chironomini, Pseudochironomini) 2

2. Mentum with a single broad median tooth, ventromental plates slender, scarcely separated medially. Anal tubules elongate, manifold exceeding the length of parapods (Fig. 2) Manoa

2.— Mentum with paired median teeth, first laterals shorter than median and second lateral teeth, ventromental plates widely separated. Anal tubules shorter than parapods Polypedilum

Notes: The only Tanytarsini collected was 1 specimen of Tanytarsus sp. (Fig. 3) in stream 14, site 3. One individual of Manoa sp. (Pseudochironomini) was recorded in Glacier stream 15, site 3. Both taxa are particularly rare.

Table 1.

Basic environmental variables of the studied streams. For details see Kuhn et al. (2011).

t01_663.gif

Table 2.

Chironomid taxa recorded in the surveyed streams in the Antisana region, Ecuador, in Jan 2008. Numbers indicate summary abundance in 5 Surber samples; + indicate records in qualitative samples.

t02_663.gif

Figs. 2–7.

Manoa sp.: 2a. Labrum-epipharyngis. 2b. Antennae. 2c. Mentum, mandibles and ventromental plates. 2d. Posterior parapods and anal tubules, lateral view. Tanytarsus sp.: 3a Mandible. 3b. Mentum and ventromental plates. 3c. Head capsule, ventral view. 3d. Labro-epipharyngeal region (arrow indicates premandibles with 3 teeth). Limaya sp.: 4a. Mandible. 4b. Mentum. 4c. Antenna. 4d. Labro-epipharyngeal region. Paraheptagyia sp. A: 5a. Head capsule, dorsal view. 5b. Mentum and mandibles. 5c. Head capsule, ventral view, arrow indicates occipital margin. Paraheptagyia sp. B: 6a. Mentum. 6b. Mandibles. 6c. Anal end of body, lateral view. 6d. Head capsule, ventral view, arrow indicates occipital margin. Parochlus sp. A: 7a, e. Anal end with posterior parapods, procercus and anal setae, lateral and dorsal view. 7b. Mentum and mandibles. 7c. Claws of posterior parapods (note the 2 types of claws indicated by arrow). 7d. Antenna.

f02_663.jpg

Subfamily Diamesinae

1. Mentum with a very broad middle tooth and 5 lateral teeth, occipital margin moderately developed (in the fourth instar larva) (Fig. 4) Limaya

1.— Mentum with 2 slightly smaller but non-recessed median teeth and more than 8 pairs of lateral teeth 2

2. Occipital margin very strong, dark brown to black, close to 30% of the head (Fig. 5) Paraheptagyia sp. A

2.— Occipital margin narrow, dark brown (Fig. 6) Paraheptagyia sp. B

Notes: Both Paraheptagyia types occur together in middle stream sites, and P. type B could be just a younger instar of P. type A.

Subfamily Orthocladiinae

1. Anal end without procercus, or if present, without distinct anal setae and posterior parapods 2

1.— Procercus present, posterior parapods well developed 3

2. Anterior parapods basally fused, with numerous fine spines on basal part. Posterior parapods reduced but separate and bearing simple claws, there is a line of fine claws beneath. Mentum with a single median tooth with a nipple and 5 pairs of lateral teeth (Fig. 22) Smittia

2.— Anterior and posterior parapods missing. Mentum with a single broad media tooth and 5 pairs of laterals. Mandible with 4 inner teeth, second is smaller than first and third (Fig. 21) Pseudosmittia

3. Antenna subequal to, or longer than head capsule, 4 segmented (Fig. 10) Corynoneura

3.— Antenna shorter than half length of head, with 5 to 6 segments 4

4. Antenna about one-third as long as head capsule, head prolonged. Body setation strong and obvious even under small magnification (Fig. 18) Onconeura sp.

4.— Antenna shorter, body setation weak, head more round 5

5. Mentum with 2 or more median teeth 6

5.— Mentum with 1 median tooth 8

6. Median mental teeth higher and broader than first lateral teeth. Wedge shaped darkly pigmented tubercle below outermost lateral teeth (Fig. 15) Limnophyes

6.— Median teeth smaller and shorter than first laterals. No such structure below outermost lateral teeth 7

7. Antenna reduced, basal segment at most as long as wide, usually shorter. Median teeth minute, much lower than first and second lateral teeth (that are at least 2× as long as other laterals) (Fig. 17) Metriocnemus fuscipes gr.

7.— Antenna not reduced, basal segment longer than wide, median teeth the same level or just a bit lower than the first laterals. First and second lateral teeth less than twice as long as other laterals (Fig. 16) Metriocnemus eurynotus gr.

8. Median tooth broad, ≥⃒ 3× wider than the first lateral teeth and of triangular shape, ventromental plates well developed, extending well beyond lateral margin of mentum. Antenna with 6 segments; segment 6 hair-like (Fig. 20) arakiefferiella

8.— Median tooth < 3× wider than first lateral teeth -9

9. Median tooth obviously higher than first lateral teeth. Second lateral teeth reduced, pressed against first lateral teeth. Mentum and mandibles dark brown to black, outer margin of mandibles crenulated (Fig. 14) Cricotopus sp. D

9.— Median tooth subequal to first lateral teeth, mandibles and mentum light- to dark brown 10

10. Median tooth and first lateral teeth are equal in size, first laterals rounded, taller and broader than the rest of lateral teeth that are subequal and pointy. Head capsule dark (Fig. 19) Orthocladius (Euo.) sp.

10.— Median tooth broader than first lateral, head capsule yellow to brown 11

11. Seta submenti located well anterior to posterior margin of ventromental plates (Fig. 11) Cricotopus sp. A

11.— Seta submenti located beyond posterior margin of ventromental plates 12

12. Occipital margin broad and transparent, the same color as head capsule; ventral opening of occipital margin of trapezoidal shape (Fig. 13) Cricotopus sp. C

12.– Occipital margin narrow, darker than head capsule; ventral opening wide, without trapezoidal shape (Fig. 12) Cricotopus sp. B

Figs. 8–13.

Parochlus sp. B: 8a to c. Anal end with posterior parapod, procercus and anal setae, lateral (a, b) and dorsal view (c). Podonomus sp.: 9a. Anterior parapod with fan shaped arrangement of claws, lateral view. 9b, c. Anal end with posterior parapod, procercus, and anal setae, dorsolateral view. 9d. Larvae under low magnification. Corynoneura lobata group: 10a. Antenna. 10b. Mentum, mandibles, and labro-epipharyngeal region (arrows indicate bifid SI and pecten). 10c. Head capsule, dorsolateral view. Cricotopus sp. A: 11a. Labro-epipharyngeal region. 11b. Body. 11c. Body setation (indicated by arrow). 11d. Head capsule, ventral view (position of seta submenti indicated by arrow). 11e. Mandible. Cricotopus sp. B: 12a. Mandible. 12b. Head capsule, ventral view. 12c. Mentum view (position of seta submenti indicated by arrow). 12d. Body segment with seta (indicated by arrow). Cricotopus sp. C: 13a. Mandible. 13b. Head capsule, ventral view. 13c. Mentum (arrow indicates position of seta submenti).

f08_663.jpg

Fig. 14–19.

Cricotopus sp. D: 14a. Mentum. Arrow indicates the reduced second lateral tooth. 14b. Mandible. 14c. Head capsule, ventral view. Limnophyes sp.: 15a. Anal end of body, anal tubules are indicated by arrow. 15b. Antenna and mandible, arrow indicates long antennal blade. 15c. Mentum with wedge shaped tubercle (indicated by arrow). Metriocnemus eurynotus group: 16a. Mandible. 16b. Antenna. 16c. Mentum. 16d. Head capsule, ventral view. Metriocnemus fuscipes group: 17a. Antenna. 17b. Mandible. 17c. Mentum. Onconeura sp.: 18a. Head capsule. Arrow indicates antenna. 18b. Mentum and mandible. 18c. Antenna. 18d. Body segments with strong setation. Orthocladius (Euo.) sp.: 19a. Mentum. 19b. Head capsule, ventral view. 19c. Detail of occipital margin. 19d. Antenna and madible.

f14_663.jpg

Figs. 20–23.

Parakiefferiella sp.: 20a. Mandible. 20b. Antenna. Arrow indicates vestigial sixth segment. 20c. Mentum. Pseudosmittia sp.: 21a. Head capsule, ventral view. 21b. Anal end, ventral view. 21c. Mentum and mandible. Smittia sp.: 22a. Head capsule, ventral view. 22b. Mentum. 22c. Basally fused anterior parapods, with 2 types of claws (fine spines are indicated by arrow), lateral view. 22d. Posterior parapods (detail), ventral view. Arrow indicate a row of minute claws below regular size claws. 22e. Anal end of the body, ventral view. Pentaneura sp.: 23a. Head capsule, ventral view. 23b. Ligula and paraligula. 23c. Maxillary palp with sensilla. 23d. Anal end of body.

f20_663.jpg

Notes: The most common orthoclads are Cricotopus sp. A, C. sp. B, and C. sp. C. Even though these morphotypes are very similar, they can be distinguished as follows: Cricotopus sp. A (Fig. 11) has a characteristic body coloration; the first 3 body segments are pale, while the remaining are purple. Seta submenti is situated between ventromental plates. The head is dark brown, the mentum, mandibles, and occipital margin are dark brown to black. The apical tooth of mandible long and pointy. Abdominal segments with a pair of setal tufts (Fig. 11c) (also occurs in Cricotopus sp. B), but may be weak and easily overlooked. Cricotopus sp. A is common, most abundant in the uppermost site, also occurs at lower elevations, but much less frequently. The most obvious difference between Cricotopus sp. B (Fig. 12) and C. sp. C (Fig. 13) is the color and shape of occipital margin; although occipital margin of C sp. B is narrow and slightly darker than head capsule, C. sp. C has broad and pale occipital margin, about the same color as head capsule. In addition, ventral opening of occipital margin in C. sp. C has a characteristic trapezoidal shape, while that of C. sp. B is wide, without trapezoidal shape. Abdominal segments of C. sp. B bear very weak setal tufts (Fig. 12d); however, they could be easily overlooked. Both types are common in the glacier-fed sites; however, C. sp. B is most abundant in the middle ones, while C. sp. C is absent in the uppermost ones, and its abundance increases with decreasing altitude, and is most abundant in the lowermost sites.

Subfamily Podonominae

1. Dark brown to black head capsule and procerci, claws of anterior and posterior parapods arranged in comb shape, anal setae compact (Fig. 9). Common in all sites, most abundant in the uppermost ones, close to the glacier terminus Podonomus

1.— Pale to light brown head capsule, procerci and body 2

2. Light brown body with obvious setae, procerci 3 to 4× as long as broad, anal setae arranged in fan shape, head slightly curved (Fig. 7) Parochlus sp. A

2.— Body, head and procerci pale, procerci much longer than in the previous species, anal setae long and compact (parallel), body without setae (Fig. 8) Parochlus sp. B

Notes: Parochlus sp. A was common and abundant in all sites. Parochlus sp. B was much less frequent than Podonomus and Parochlus sp. A, and occurred at higher locations.

Discussion

The most abundant genus was Parochlus, occurring in almost all sampled sites. This is a cold-stenothermic genus with a wide ecological valence in running waters of high latitudes and high altitudes. The main habitats are different types of mountain streams, but several species prefer springs, and some occur among mosses in shallow tarns and other small water bodies (Wiederholm 1983). The genus seem to be confined to the southern temperate zones, included the Andean mountain chains and the South Shetland Islands in true Antarctic latitudes. In our study, 2 morphotypes of Parochlus were determined. Other commonly sampled Podonominae was Podonomus. Larvae of Podonomus are found inhabiting mainly cold streams and brooks. The genus in the southern hemisphere occurs from the highest areas of the Bolivian Andes to the Strait of Magellan in South America, as well as in Tasmania, New South Wales, and New Zealand in the Australian region (Brundin 1966).

The subfamily Orthocladiinae was represented by 8 genera, comprising 13 morphotypes. Cricotopus, represented by 4 morphotypes, was the most widespread orthoclad, occurring in all sites. The genus is one of the largest in the Orthocladiinae, comprising 5 subgenera, with worldwide distribution (Cranston et al. 1989, Ashe & O'Connor 2009), except for Antarctica. Cricotopus larvae occur in all types of water bodies, including some saline and coastal waters. The group often is recorded in association with aquatic macrophytes, algae, and sometimes cyanobacteria. Some larvae mine in macrophytes, many graze on the surfaces (Wiederholm 1983). Metriocnemus van der Wulp is a worldwide genus with more than 60 Holarctic species (Cranston et al. 1989) and 5 endemic species from the Neotropical region (Spies & Reiss 1996; Donato & Paggi 2005). However, none of the specimens from glacier-fed streams in Ecuador could be ascribed to any of the previously described species. The genus occurs in one of the widest biotope ranges of any dipteran genus (Sæther 1989), ranging from mosses and higher vegetation, pitcher plants and hollow trees, to margins of springs, ditches, streams, damp soils, and hygropetric biotopes, and occasionally also lakes and rock pools (Cranston & Judd 1987; Sæther 1989, 1995).

The subfamily Diamesinae was represented by 2 genera, Limaya Brundin and Paraheptagyia Brundin. The latter presented at least 2 morphotypes; however, Paraheptagyia sp. B might be just a lower instar of P. sp. A. Larval Paraheptagyia usually can be found in thin water films alongside waterfalls, or in the splash zone of streams.

Chironominae was the second least widespread subfamily sampled in this study, and always was collected in small numbers. The group was represented by only 3 genera: Manoa Fittkau, Polypedilum Kieffer, and Tanytarsus van der Wulp. The lack of Chironominae in our samples might be largely related to the preference for tropical and subtropical lowlands exhibited by most members of this subfamily. Furthermore, it is important to call attention to the first record of Manoa in high Andean regions. The genus was described from all stages from Amazonia, and a second adult species has been described from East Africa. Recently, the group was recorded from China (Qi et al. 2017) and the Dominican Republic (Silva et al. 2015). In the Everglades, Florida, USA, larvae of M. pahayokeensis Jacobsen & Perry are found in shallow water areas subject to fluctuating water levels and seasonal drying (Jacobsen & Perry 2002).

In our study, Tanypodinae were particularly rare; only 1 genus was recorded, Pentaneura Phillippi. This is a common genus occurring in the Nearctic and Neotropical regions (Ashe & O'Connor 2009), including some islands from the Caribbean region (Williston 1896; Ferrington et al. 1993, Silva et al. 2015). Larval Pentaneura have been recorded inhabiting a variety of aquatic systems, from ponds and lakes, associated with vascular hydrophytes and detritus, to small streams and large bodies of running water, usually living in erosion and depositional areas (Ferrington et al. 2008; Andersen et al. 2013). In the Neotropical region, Pentaneura often has been reported in greatest abundance from high-altitude headwater streams (Watson & Heyn 1992; Tejerina & Molineri 2007; Acosta & Prat 2010), ranging from 2,000 to 4,440 masl (Silva & Ferrington 2018).

The higher number of taxa recorded in glacier-fed streams (21) compared to non-glacial ones (13) is interesting, but the different methods of collection prevent us from comparison and general conclusions. However, 8 taxa occurred exclusively in glacier-fed streams (compared to only 1 taxon in non-glacier streams), which emphasizes the unique character of glaciated systems. However, in general, the most common taxa were the same in both stream types. The potential types of insect life cycles in glacier-fed streams are limited by the cold temperatures and marked seasonality. This biotope, known as kryal (Steffan 1971), is distinguished by very cold temperature (near 0 °C), highly turbid, and fast-flowing waters with low channel stability and seasonal flow regimes with high diel peaks in summer (Lods-Crozet 2002). In general, research on glacier-fed streams has not focused on the chironomid fauna. Therefore, even though the generic richness documented here seems to be lower than the actual richness of chironomids in glacier-fed streams in Ecuador, particularly considering the limited duration and extension of our study, our results represent an advance in the understanding of the chironomid communities in glacial meltwater streams. Comparing our results with Lods-Crozet et al. (2002), who sampled in 6 European glacier-fed streams, we could expect that some widespread cold-stenothermic species of the following genera are still found in aquatic ecosystems of high Andean regions in Ecuador: Diamesa Meigen, Eukiefferiella Thienemann, Orthocladius van der Wulp, and Thienemannia Kieffer. Even though our inventory documents a relatively species-poor chironomid community in glacierfed streams in Ecuador, we believe that collections in different periods and broadening the variety of sampling habitats and geographic area may reveal a greater diversity than currently detected. While recent years have seen increased activity concerning the chironomid fauna in the Neotropical region, the knowledge of the diversity and taxonomy as well as biogeography and phylogeny, especially in the high Andean regions, remains fragmentary (Acosta & Prat 2010). Thus, additional inventories are required to discover and analyze possible areas of endemism in Ecuador and the surrounding areas. The present study contributes to the knowledge of chironomid fauna in high-altitude glacier-fed and non-glacial streams in Ecuador and will hopefully motivate further studies in the area.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the field assistance of Patricio Andino, Rodrigo Espinosa, Jesper Kuhn, and Signe M. Vie. Useful comments of Narcis Prat to the identification are acknowledged. This study was funded by the National Science Centre, Poland, contract no. 2015/19/P/ ST10/04048. This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 665778. FLS was supported by fellowships from the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES - 2014/9239-13-8), and São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP - 2016/07039-8). The authors are grateful to the editor, John Capinera, and an anonymous reviewer for their valuable comments to the earlier version of the manuscript.

References Cited

1.

Acosta R, Prat N. 2010. Chironomid assemblages in high altitude streams of the Andean region of Peru.Fundamental and Applied Limnology177: 57–79. Google Scholar

2.

Andersen T, Cranston PS, Epler JH. 2013. Chironomidae of the Holarctic Region: Keys and Diagnoses. Part 1. Larvae.Insect Systematics and Evolution, Scandinavian Entomology66: 1–573. Google Scholar

3.

Andersen T, Mendes HF, Pinho LC. 2015. Mariambera, a new genus of Orthocladiinae from Brazil (Insecta: Diptera, Chironomidae).Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment50: 24–30. Google Scholar

4.

Andersen T, Pinho LC 2014. A new species of Saetherocryptus Andersen et Mendes, 2007 (Diptera: Chironomidae, Orthocladiinae) from the Amazon rainforest, Brazil.Norwegian Journal of Entomology61: 160–164. Google Scholar

5.

Ashe P, O'Connor JP. 2009. A World Catalogue of Chironomidae (Diptera). Part 1. Buchonomyiinae, Chilenomyiinae, Podonominae, Aphroteniinae, Tanypodinae, Usambaromyiinae, Diamesinae, Prodiamesinae and Telmatogetoninae.Irish Biogeographical Society & National Museum of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland. Google Scholar

6.

Brittain JE, Milner AM. 2001. Ecology of glacier-fed rivers: current status and concepts.Freshwater Biology46: 1571–1578. Google Scholar

7.

Buringh P. 1979. Introduction to the Study of Soils in Tropical and Subtropical Regions.Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen, The Netherlands. Google Scholar

8.

Brundin L. 1966. Transantarctic relationships and their significance, as evidenced by chironomid midges. With a monograph of the subfamilies Podonominae and Aphroteniinae and the austral Heptagyiae. Kungl.Svenska vetenskapsakademiens handlingar11: 1–474. Google Scholar

9.

Cadier E, Villacís M, Garcés A, Lhuissier P, Maisincho L, Laval R, Paredes D, Cáceres B, Francou B. 2007. Variations of a low latitude Andean glacier according to global and local climate variations: first results. Glacier Mass Balance Changes and Meltwater Discharge.IAHS Press Publications318: 66–74. Google Scholar

10.

Cranston PS, Judd DD. 1987. Metriocnemus (Diptera: Chironomidae) - An ecological survey and description of a new species.Journal of the New York Entomological Society95: 534–546. Google Scholar

11.

Cranston PS, Oliver DR, Sæther OA. 1989. Keys and diagnoses of the adult males of the subfamily Orthocladiinae (Diptera, Chironomidae), pp. 165–352 In Wiederholm T [ed.], Chironomidae of the Holarctic Region. Keys and Diagnoses.Adult Males, Scandinavian Entomology Supplement 34. Google Scholar

12.

Donato M, Paggi AC. 2005. A new Neotropical species of the genus Metriocnemus van der Wulp (Chironomidae: Orthocladiinae) from Eryngium L. (Apiaceae) phytotelmata.Zootaxa1050: 1–14. Google Scholar

13.

Epler JH. 2001. Identification Manual for the Larval Chironomidae (Diptera) of North and South Carolina: A Guide to the Taxonomy of the Midges of the Southeastern United States, Including Florida, North Carolina.Department of Environment and Natural Resources, and St. Johns River Water Management District, Raleigh, North Carolina, and Palatka, Florida, USA. Google Scholar

14.

Ferrington LC Jr. 2008. Global diversity of non-biting midges (Chironomidae, Insecta, Diptera) in freshwater.Hydrobiologia595: 447–455. Google Scholar

15.

Ferrington LC Jr , Berg MB, Coffman WP. 2008. Chironomidae, pp. 847–989 In Merritt RW, Cummins KW, Berg MB [eds.], An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America.Kendall/Hunt Publishing Co., Dubuque, Iowa, USA. Google Scholar

16.

Ferrington LC Jr , Buzby KM, Masteller EC. 1993. Composition and temporal abundance of Chironomidae emergence from a tropical rainforest stream at El Verde, Puerto Rico.Journal of Kansas Entomological Society66: 167–180. Google Scholar

17.

Füreder L, Schütz C, Burger R, Wallinger M. 2000. Seasonal abundance and community structure of Chironomidae in two contrasting high alpine streams.Verhandlungen des Internationalen Verein Limnologie27: 1597–1601. Google Scholar

18.

Jacobsen D, Dangles O, Andino P, Espinosa R, Hamerlík L, Cadier E. 2010. Longitudinal zonation of macroinvertebrates in an Ecuadorian glacier‐fed stream: do tropical glacial systems fit the temperate model?Freshwater Biology55: 1234–1248. Google Scholar

19.

Jacobsen RE, Perry SA. 2002. A new species of Manoa (Diptera: Chironomidae) from Everglades National Park.Journal of the North American Benthological Society21: 314–325. Google Scholar

20.

Kuhn J, Andino P, Calvez R, Espinosa R, Hamerlík L, Vie S, Dangles O, Jacobsen D. 2011. Spatial variability in macroinvertebrate assemblages along and among neighboring equatorial glacier-fed streams.Freshwater Biology56: 2226–2244. Google Scholar

21.

Lenat DR, Resh VH. 2001. Taxonomy and stream ecology - The benefits of genusand species-level identifications.Journal of the North American Benthological Society20: 287–298. Google Scholar

22.

Lencioni V, Maiolini B, Rossaro B. 2002. The kryal and rhitral chironomid community in the Carè Alto system (Italian Central-Eastern Alps).Verhandlungen des Internationalen Verein Limnologie27: 711–715. Google Scholar

23.

Lods-Crozet B, Lencioni V, Ólafsson JS, Snook DL, Velle G, Brittain JE, Castella E, Rossaro B. 2002. Chironomid (Diptera: Chironomidae) communities in six European glacier-fed streams.Freshwater Biology46: 1791–1809. Google Scholar

24.

Maisincho L, Cáceres B, Manciati C, Loyo C, Cuenca E, Villacís M, Paredes D, Garces A, Laval R, Mailler S, Bucher R, Delachaux F, Freire D, Chazarin JP, Francou B, Cadier E. 2007. Glaciares del Ecuador: Antisana y Carihuayrazo.Informe del Año 2005, IRD, INAMHI & EMAAP-Q, Quito, Ecuador. Google Scholar

25.

Milner AM, Petts GE. 1994. Glacial rivers: physical habitat and ecology.Freshwater Biology32: 295–307. Google Scholar

26.

Oliveira CSN, Silva FL, Trivinho-Strixino S. 2013. Thalassomyia gutae sp. n., a new marine chironomid (Chironomidae: Telmatogetoninae) from the Brazilian coast.Zootaxa3701: 589–595. Google Scholar

27.

Parise AG, Pinho LC. 2016. A new species of Stenochironomus Kieffer, 1919 from the Atlantic Rainforest in southern Brazil (Diptera: Chironomidae).Aquatic Insects37: 1–7. Google Scholar

28.

Prat N, Acosta R, Villamarín C, Rieradevall M. 2010. Guia para el reconocimiento de las larvas de Chironomidae (Diptera) de los ríos altoandinos de Ecuador y Perú - 3: clave para la determinación de los principales morfotipos larvarios.Proyectos de investigación CERA, FUCARA y BIQURA, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. Google Scholar

29.

Prat N, Rieradevall M, Acosta R, Villamarín C. 2011. Guia para el reconocimiento de las larvas de Chironomidae (Diptera) de los ríos altoandinos de Ecuador y Perú.Grupo de Investigación FEM Departamento de Ecología, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. Google Scholar

30.

Qi X, Wang XH, Andersen T, Lin XL. 2017. A new species of Manoa Fittkau (Diptera: Chironomidae), with DNA barcodes from Xianju National Park, Oriental China.Zootaxa4231: 398–408. Google Scholar

31.

Roback SS, Coffman WP. 1983. Results of the Catherwood Bolivian-Peruvian Altiplano Expedition. Part II. Aquatic Diptera including montane Diamesinae and Orthocladiinae.Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia135: 9–79. Google Scholar

32.

Robinson CT, Uehlinger U, Hieber M. 2001. Spatio-temporal variation in macroinvertebrate assemblages of glacial streams in the Swiss Alps.Freshwater Biology46: 1663–1672. Google Scholar

33.

Ruiz-Moreno JL, Ospina-Torres R, Gómez-Sierra H, Riss W. 2000. Guía para la identification genérica de larvas de quirono´midos (Diptera: Chironomidae) de la sabana de Bogota. III. Subfamilias Tanypodinae, Podonominae y Diamesinae.Caldasia22: 34–60. Google Scholar

34.

Sæther OA. 1968. Chironomids from the Finse area, Norway, with special reference to their distribution in a glacier brook.Archiv für Hydrobiologie64: 426–483. Google Scholar

35.

Sæther OA. 1989. Metriocnemus van der Wulp: a new species and a revision of species described by Meigen, Zetterstedt, Staeger, Holmgren, Lundstrom and Strenzke (Diptera: Chironomidae).Entomologica Scandinavica19: 393–430. Google Scholar

36.

Sæther OA. 1995. Metriocnemus van der Wulp; seven new species, revision of species, and new records (Diptera: Chironomidae).Annales de Limnologie31: 35–64. Google Scholar

37.

Silva FL, Ekrem T. 2016. Phylogenetic relationships of non-biting midges in the subfamily Tanypodinae (Diptera: Chironomidae) inferred from morphology.Systematic Entomology41: 73–92. Google Scholar

38.

Silva FL, Ferrington Jr LC. 2018. Systematics of the new world genus Pentaneura Phillipi (Diptera: Chironomidae: Tanypodinae): historical review, new species and phylogeny.Zoologischer Anzeiger271: 1–31. Google Scholar

39.

Silva FL, Oliveira CS. 2016. Tanypus urszulae, a new Tanypodinae (Diptera: Chironomidae) from the Neotropical Region.Zootaxa4178: 593–600. Google Scholar

40.

Silva FL, Oliveira CSN, Trivinho-Strixino S. 2014a. Metapelopia corbii gen. n., sp. n., a new Tanypodinae (Diptera: Chironomidae) from the Neotropical Region.Annales de Limnologie - International Journal of Limnology50: 85–95. Google Scholar

41.

Silva FL, Wiedenbrug S. 2015. Amazonimyia gigantae gen. n., sp. n., a new Tanypodinae (Diptera: Chironomidae) from the Neotropical Region.Zootaxa3947: 275–281. Google Scholar

42.

Silva FL, Wiedenbrug S, Farrell B. 2015. A preliminary survey of the non-biting midges (Diptera: Chironomidae) of the Dominican Republic.CHIRONOMUS Journal of Chironomidae Research28: 12–19. Google Scholar

43.

Silva FL, Wiedenbrug S, Oliveira CSN. 2014b. Denopelopia moema, a new Tanypodinae (Diptera: Chironomidae) from the Neotropical Region.Zootaxa3753: 297–299. Google Scholar

44.

Siri A, Campos RE, Donato M, 2015. A new species of Larsia Fittkau, 1962 (Diptera: Chironomidae: Tanypodinae) from phytotelmata of Aechmea distichantha Lemaire, 1853 (Bromeliaceae) in Argentina.Aquatic Insects36: 125–134. Google Scholar

45.

Spies M, Andersen T, Epler JH, Watson CN Jr. 2009. Chironomidae (non-biting midges), pp. 437–480 In Brown BV, Borkent A, Cumming JM, Wood DM, Woodley NE, Zumbado M [eds.], Manual of Central American Diptera, NRC Research Press, Ottawa, Canada. Google Scholar

46.

Spies M, Reiss F. 1996. Catalog and bibliography of Neotropical and Mexican Chironomidae (Insecta, Diptera).Spixiana Supplement22: 61–119. Google Scholar

47.

Steffan AW. 1971. Chironomid (Diptera) biocoenoses in Scandinavian glacier brooks.Canadian Entomologist103: 477–486. Google Scholar

48.

Tejerina EG, Molineri C. 2007. Comunidades de Chironomidae (Diptera) en arroyos de montaña del NOA: comparación entre Yungas y Monte.Revista de la Sociedad Entomológica Argentina66: 169–177. Google Scholar

49.

Thienemann A. 1954. Chironomus: Leben, Verbreitung und wirtschaftliche Bedeutung der Chironomiden.Die Binnengewässer, Stuttgart Germany. Google Scholar

50.

Tokeshi M. 1995. Life cycles and population dynamics, pp. 225–268 In Armitage D, Cranston PS, Pinder LCV [eds.], The Chironomidae. Biology and Ecology of Non-biting Midges.Chapman and Hall, New York, USA. Google Scholar

51.

Trivinho-Strixino S. 2014. Ordem Diptera. Família Chironomidae. Guia de identificaçāo de larvas, pp. 457–660 In Hamada N, Nessimian JL, Querino RB [eds.], Insetos Aquático na Amazônia Brasileira: Taxonomia, Biologia e Ecologia.Editora do Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Manaus, Brazil. Google Scholar

52.

Trivinho-Strixino S, Silva FL, Oliveira CSN. 2013. Tapajos cristinae n. gen., n. sp. (Diptera: Chironomidae: Chironominae) from the Neotropical Region.Zootaxa3710: 395–399. Google Scholar

53.

Trivinho-Strixino S, Wiedenbrug S, Silva FL. 2015. New species of Tanytarsus van der Wulp (Diptera: Chironomidae: Tanytarsini) from Brazil.European Journal of Environmental Sciences5: 92–100. Google Scholar

54.

Watson CN Jr , Heyn MW. 1992. A preliminary survey of the Chironomidae (Diptera) of Costa Rica, with emphasis on the lotic fauna.Netherlands Journal of Aquatic Ecology26: 257–262. Google Scholar

55.

Wiederholm T. 1983. Chironomidae of the Holarctic Region. Part. 1: Larvae.Entomologica Scandinavica Supplement19: 1–457. Google Scholar

56.

Williston SW. 1896. On the Diptera of St. Vincent (West Indies).Transactions of the Entomological Society of London3: 25. Google Scholar
Ladislav Hamerlik, Fabio Laurindo da Silva, and Dean Jacobsen "Chironomidae (Insecta: Diptera) of Ecuadorian Highaltitude Streams: A Survey and Illustrated Key," Florida Entomologist 101(4), 663-675, (1 December 2018). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.101.0404
Published: 1 December 2018
JOURNAL ARTICLE
13 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top