Translator Disclaimer
30 September 2019 Morphology of the Ovary and Spermatheca of the Leafcutter Ant Acromyrmex rugosus Queens (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The leafcutter ant Acromyrmex rugosus Smith (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) is considered a pest of several crops. In this study we investigated the morphology of the ovary and spermatheca of A. rugosus queens. The ovary is meroistic polytrophic with 12 ovarioles per ovary. Each ovariole has a short terminal filament, a germarium, and a long vitellarium with growth follicles. The nurse chamber near the germarium is larger than the egg chamber. The follicular cells surrounding the egg chamber are cuboidal, with a well-developed nucleus, whereas those surrounding the nurse chamber are flattened. The oocyte increases in volume along the ovariole toward the lateral oviduct. Oocytes have multiple accessory nuclei. Mature oocytes have cytoplasm rich in yolk granules. The reservoir epithelium of the spermatheca shows morphological differences, with both columnar and flattened cells. The spermathecal gland has elongated and acinus-like cells.

Leafcutter ants are eusocial insects that occur exclusively in the Americas and have a wide Neotropical distribution (Della Lucia et al. 2014). Species of the genus Atta and Acromyrmex (both Hymenoptera: Formicidae) cause significant economic damage to agriculture and forestry (Mundim et al. 2012). However, they also are useful, because colonies of these insects play a role in nutrient turnover, increasing soil nutrient concentration (Sousa-Souto et al. 2007; Sternberg et al. 2007; Pinto-Tomás et al. 2009).

The leafcutter ant Acromyrmex rugosus Smith (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) is found in the Cerrado and Caatinga biomes from Brazil, and it is considered a pest of cotton, beans, cassava, corn, orange, and eucalyptus plantations (Gonçalves 1961). Their colonies are monogy-nous, with a single reproductive queen, and the number of workers may range from 112 to 2,029 individuals (Soares et al. 2006).

In insects, the female reproductive tract consists of a pair of ovaries, lateral oviducts that open into a common oviduct, a spermatheca that usually contains an associated gland, and a vagina (Bünning 1994; Tsai & Perrier 1996). Each ovary is formed by elongated structures, termed ovarioles, that consist of a terminal filament, a germarium, and a vitellarium (Tsai & Perrier 1996; Belles & Piulachs 2015). In ants, the ovaries are classified as meroistic polytrophic in which the nurse cells accompany the oocytes, forming the ovarian follicles. These follicles consist of an oocytic chamber and a nurse chamber, surrounded by a layer of follicular cells (Antunes et al. 2002; Cruz-Landim 2009; Mao et al. 2016).

The anterior part of the ovariole, called a terminal filament, consists of a filiform aggregate of undifferentiated cells that joins the ovarioles to each other and to the body wall (Amaral & Machado-Santelli 2009; Cruz-Landim 2009). Oogenesis begins in the germarium with the division of germ cells (Pearson et al. 2016). Each cystoblast undergoes successive mitoses to produce a cyst with many cells. The oocyte originates from 1 of these cells, whereas the nurse cells originate from others (Buning 1994; Patrício & Cruz-Landim 2006). The main portion of the ovariole is the vitellarium, in which oocytes grow and store yolk (Cruz-Landim 2009; Farder-Gomes et al. 2019). As the oocytes mature, they move towards the ovariole, so that oocytes in early stages of development are at the germarium end and the mature ones are at the oviduct end, ready for fertilization (Farder-Gomes et al. 2019).

After mating, many female insects store spermatozoa in the spermatheca, which protects and supplies essential compounds for their survival and nutrition (Stacconi & Romani 2011; Pascini & Martins 2016). The spermatheca is an important structure for queen ants, as they mate only once and the amount of spermatozoa stored during the single nuptial flight determines their reproductive success and colony longevity (Tschinkel & Porter 1988; Baer et al. 2006).

The female reproductive tract of leafcutter ants has been studied in few species and exhibit a great variability in the number of ovaries and spermatheca (Tschinkel 1987; Antunes et al. 2002; Dijkstra et al. 2005; Ortiz & Camargo-Mathias 2006, 2007; Cardoso et al. 2008). Although these studies provide data on the morphology, more detailed information on anatomy and histology of the reproductive tract of A. rugosus are scarce, and additional studies are important for understanding the basic organization of this ant species, and allowing comparative studies with other ants. The objective of this study was to investigate the morphology of the ovary and spermatheca of A. rugosus queens.

Materials and Methods

Four A. rugosus queens were collected by nest excavation and 3 fertilized winged foraging females were collected from a trail in Florestal (19.871200°S, 44.423900°W), Minas Gerais State, Brazil. All queens were known to be fertilized because they had spermatozoa stored in the spermatheca. The specimens were dissected in 125 mM NaCl and the reproductive tract transferred to Zamboni's fixative solution (Stefanini et al. 1967) for 24 h. The samples were dehydrated in a graded ethanol series (70, 80, 90, and 95% for 15 min each). Next, the samples were embedded in historesin Leica, and the 3 µm thickness histological sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, analyzed with an Olympus BX-60 light microscope (Olympus Corporation, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan), and photographed with an Olympus QColor 3 camera (Olympus Corporation, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan).

Results

The reproductive tract of A. rugosus had a pair of ovaries with 12 ovarioles each, lateral oviducts connecting the ovaries to a common oviduct, a spermatheca, and an extensive network of trachea associated with the ovaries (Fig. 1).

Each ovariole had a short terminal filament in the apical portion, followed by a dilated apical region, the germarium, in which somatic and germinative cells were indistinguishable (Fig. 2A). After the germarium, the vitellarium was the longest ovariole region, with many follicles formed by egg, and nurse chambers with 11 nurse cells, surrounded by a layer of follicular cells, characterizing a meroistic polytrophic ovary (Fig. 2B).

The nurse chamber was larger than the egg chamber near the germarium, with large nurse cells with well-developed nucleus (Fig. 2B, C). In this region of the ovariole, oocytes in the initial stages of development showed basophilic and homogeneous cytoplasm (Fig. 2C). The follicular cells that surrounded the egg chamber were cuboidal and had a well-developed nucleus, whereas those surrounding the nurse chamber were flattened (Fig. 2C, E). The follicular epithelium was disrupted by a connection between the nurse and egg chambers, and the oocytes had multiple accessory nuclei (Fig. 2E).

Fig. 1.

General appearance of the Acromyrmex rugosus reproductive system. Ovariole (Ov); lateral oviduct (Lo); spermatheca (Sp); trachea associated with the ovarioles (white arrow). Scale bar: 500 µm.

img-A91_515.jpg

The oocytes increased in volume as they moved toward the lateral oviduct, and the egg chambers gradually became larger than the nurse chambers. During the oocyte maturation, yolk granules began to accumulate in the ooplasm (Fig. 2F, G). The nurse cells were restricted to a small region of the nurse chamber (Fig. 2H) and showed degenerative features, such as cytoplasmic reduction and nuclear chromatin condensation. The mature egg chamber showed flattened follicular cells and oocyte with cytoplasm rich in yolk granules (Fig. 2H).

Acromyrmex rugosus had 1 lobate spermatheca connected to the common oviduct via a narrow duct (Fig. 1). The epithelium of the spermathecal reservoir showed morphological differences, with the upper 2/3 formed by columnar cells and the remainder with flattened cells (Fig. 3A). The transition between the columnar and flattened epithelium occurred gradually (Fig. 3B). The spermatheca showed an external secretory portion with elongated, acinus-like cells forming the spermathecal gland (Fig. 3A, C). These cells had a well-developed nucleus and granule-rich cytoplasm (Fig. 3A, B). Muscle layers surrounded the entire spermatheca below the gland (Fig. 3A) and in the insertion region of the spermathecal duct. Many muscle formed the spermathecal pump (Fig. 3D).

Discussion

The number of ovarioles found in A. rugosus was different from that found in Acromyrmex subterraneus subterraneus (Forel) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), with 28 ovarioles per ovary (Antunes et al. 2002); Acromyrmex ameliae De Souza, Soares & Della Lucia (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) with 13 to 15 ovarioles per ovary (Soares et al. 2010); Acromyrmex octospinosus Reich (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and Acromyrmex echinatior (Forel) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), with 5 to 6 ovarioles per ovary (Dijkstra et al. 2005); and queens of the genus Atta with more than 300 ovarioles per ovary (Tschinkel 1987). The number of ovarioles per ovary in ants vary from 2 to 1,300 (Hölldobler & Wilson 1990), and may be related to the queen's reproductive capacity (Antunes et al. 2002). In addition, the number of ovarioles may be influenced by environmental and genetic factors, and food availability during larval development (Bergland et al 2008; Jervis et al. 2008; Green & Extavour 2012).

Fig. 2.

Light micrographs of an Acromyrmex rugosus ovariole. (A) Terminal filament (Tf) and germarium (Ge). Scale bar: 30 µm. (B) The vitellarium region with the egg chamber (Oc) and nurse chamber (Nc) at various stages of development, covered by follicular cells (Fc). Scale bar: 30 µm. (C) A follicle at the early stage of development with a small egg chamber (Oc) enveloped by cuboidal follicular cells (Fc) and a well-developed nurse chamber (Nc). N, nurse cell nucleus. Scale bar: 20 µm. (D) Flat follicular cells (Fc) covering the nurse chamber (Nc). Scale bar: 20 µm. (E) A follicle with an oocyte (Oc) with multiple accessory nuclei (black arrowhead). A disruption in the follicular epithelium that allows communication between the egg and nurse chambers (black arrow). Scale bar: 20 µm. (F) Oocytes (Oc) in the late maturation stages with a large number of yolk granules in the cytoplasm (black arrow), enveloped by cuboidal follicular (Fc) cells. The nurse chamber (Nc) is smaller than the egg chamber (Oc). Scale bar: 30 µm. (G) Cuboidal follicular epithelium (Fc) covering the oocyte (Oc). Scale bar: 20 µm. (H) A follicle at the final stage of development with degenerating nurse cells (Nc). Yolk granules in the ooplasm (black arrow). Oc, oocyte; Fc, follicular cells. Scale bar: 10 µm.

img-ASoK_515.jpg

Fig. 3.

Light micrographs of an Acromyrmex rugosus spermatheca: (A) General appearance of the spermatheca with regions of columnar (Ce) and flat (Fe) epithelia in the reservoir and spermathecal gland (Gl) containing cells with a well-developed nucleus (black arrow). Scale bar: 30 µm. (B) The reservoir epithelium and transition between columnar (Ce) and flat epithelia (Fe). Scale bar: 10 µm. (C) The spermathecal gland (Gl) containing cells with a well-developed nucleus (black arrow) and cytoplasm with granules. Scale bar: 10 µm. (D) The spermathecal pump with muscles (Mu) associated with the spermathecal duct (D). Scale bar: 10 µm. Lu, lumen; Mu, muscles.

img-AyJX_515.jpg

Nurse cells are important for oocyte development, producing RNA and proteins, which are transported to the oocyte through disruptions in the follicular epithelium (De Loof et al. 1990; Cruz-Landim 2009). The nurse cells of A. rugosus degenerated after transfer of their cytoplasm into the oocyte (nurse cell dumping), similar to that reported for other Hymenoptera (Amaral & Machado-Santelli 2009; Dong et al. 2010; Okada et al. 2010). The presence of accessory nuclei in A. rugosus oocytes has been reported in other hymenopterans (Martins & Serrão 2004), with a possible role in ribonucleoprotein production for special regions of the ooplasm (Bilinski 1991a, b).

The lobate spermatheca of A. rugosus is similar to that reported for other species in the genus Acromyrmex, as well as in other myrmicine ants (Wheeler & Krutzsch 1994; Ortiz & Camargo-Mathias 2006, 2007; Cardoso et al. 2008), suggesting that this spermathecal shape is common to this subfamily. The presence of columnar epithelium in the spermathecal reservoir wall of A. rugosus also has been reported in A. subterraneus subterraneus, Acromyrmex balzani (Emery) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), Acromyrmex landolti (Forel) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), and Acromyrmex landolti balzani Emery (Hymenoptera: Formicidae); however, only A. rugosus, A. subterraneus, and A. balzani have spermathecal glands (Ortiz & Camargo-Mathias 2007; Cardoso et al. 2008). The gland secretions act as nutrients for the spermatozoa, contributing to the maintenance of their viability for long periods (den Boer et al. 2009; Wolfner 2011). Columnar epithelium in the spermathecal reservoir has been claimed to play some role in the release of content to the lumen (Ortiz & Camargo-Mathias 2007). Further investigation is needed to determine whether or not secretion from reservoir epithelium and spermathecal gland have similar compounds and functions.

Attini queens mate only at the beginning of their reproductive life, but with many males (polyandry), and store all the spermatozoa in the spermatheca (Pabalan et al. 1996; Gotoh et al. 2009). Therefore, these queens should control the amount of spermatozoa used during oocyte fertilization. The spermathecal pump muscles found in A. rugosus may be responsible for opening and closing the spermathecal duct, and control the transport of spermatozoa to the reservoir during mating and from the reservoir to the common oviduct during egg fertilization (Cardoso et al. 2008).

Our results show that A. rugosus queens have a pair of meroistic polytrophic ovaries with 12 ovarioles each and only 1 lobate spermatheca with a differentiated reservoir epithelium. Data on the organization of the reproductive tract of Acromyrmex queens contributes to understanding the details of the reproductive biology of leafcutter ants, and allows comparative studies with other ants.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) – (Finance Code 001), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG), through the Fortis-UFV Program and Public Notice 01/2014, Universal Demand, Process: CAG - APQ-01842-14, for the financial support.

References Cited

1.

Amaral JB, Machado-Santelli GM. 2009. Three-dimensional reconstruction of ovaries of leaf-cutting ant (Atta sexdens rubropilosa) queens (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).Sociobiology53: 379–388. Google Scholar

2.

Antunes EC, Serrão JE, Della Lucia TMC. 2002. Morphology of the reproductive tract of Acromyrmex subterraneus subterraneus queens (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).Sociobiology39: 269–279. Google Scholar

3.

Baer B, Armitage AO, Boomsma JJ. 2006. Sperm storage induces an immunity cost in ants.Nature44: 872–875. Google Scholar

4.

Belles X, Piulachs MD. 2015. Ecdysone signalling and ovarian development in insects: from stem cells to ovarian follicle formation.Biochimica et Biophysica Acta1849: 181–186. Google Scholar

5.

Bergland AO, Genissel A, Nuzhdin SV, Tatar M. 2008. Quantitative trait loci affecting phenotypic plasticity and the allometric relationship of ovariole number and thorax length in Drosophila melanogaster.Genetics180: 567–582. Google Scholar

6.

Bilinski S.1991a. Are accessory nuclei involved in the establishment of developmental gradients in hymenoptera oocytes? Wilhelm Rouxs Archives of Developmental Biology199: 423–426. Google Scholar

7.

Bilinski S.1991b. Morphological markers of anteroposterior and dorsoventral polarity in developing oocytes of hymenopteran, Cosmoconus meridionator (Ichneumonidae).Wilhelm Rouxs Archives of Developmental Biology200: 330–335. Google Scholar

8.

Bünning J.1994. The Insect Ovary: Ultrastructure, Previtellogenic Growth and Evolution.Chapman & Hall, London, United Kingdom. Google Scholar

9.

Cardoso DC, Fortes JC, Cristiano MP, Zanuncio JC, Serrão JE. 2008. Spermathecae and associated glands of the ants Solenopsis saevissima and Acromyrmex subterraneus subterraneus (Hymenoptera: Myrmicinae).Sociobiology52: 377–385. Google Scholar

10.

Cruz-Landim C.2009. Abelhas – Morfologia e Função de Sistemas.Editora UNESP, São Paulo, Brazil. Google Scholar

11.

De Loof A, Geysen J, Cardoen J, Verachtert B. 1990. Comparative developmental physiology and molecular cytology of the polytrophic ovarian follicles of the blow fly Sarcophaga bullata and the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster.Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology96: 309–321. Google Scholar

12.

Della Lucia TMC, Gandra LC, Guedes RN. 2014. Managing leaf-cutting ants: peculiarities, trends and challenges.Pest Management Science70: 14–23. Google Scholar

13.

den Boer SPA, Boomsma JJ, Baer B. 2009. Honey bee males and queens use glandular secretions to enhance sperm viability before and after storage.Journal of Insect Physiology55: 538–543. Google Scholar

14.

Dijkstra MB, Nash DR, Boomsma JJ. 2005. Self-restraint and sterility in workers of Acromyrmex and Atta leafcutter ants.Insectes Sociaux52: 67–76. Google Scholar

15.

Dong SZ, Ye GY, Guo JY, Yu XP, Hu C. 2010. Oogenesis and programmed cell death of nurse cells in the endoparasitoid, Pteromalus puparum.Microscopy Research and Technique73: 673–680. Google Scholar

16.

Farder-Gomes CF, Santos HCP, Oliveira MA, Zanuncio JC, Serrão JE. 2019. Morphology of ovary and spermathecae of the parasitoid eibesfeldtphora tonhascai Brown (Diptera: Phoridae).Protoplasma256: 3–11. Google Scholar

17.

Gonçalves CR.1961. O gênero Acromyrmex no Brasil (Hymenoptera, Formicidae).Studia Entomologica4: 113–180. Google Scholar

18.

Gotoh A, Billen J, Hashim R, Ito F. 2009. Evolution of specialized spermatheca morphology in ant queens: insight from comparative developmental biology between ants and polistine wasps.Arthropod Structure & Development38: 521–525. Google Scholar

19.

Green DAII, Extavour CG. 2012. Convergent evolution of a reproductive trait through distinct developmental mechanisms in Drosophila.Developmental Biology372: 120–130. Google Scholar

20.

Hölldobler B, Wilson EO. 1990. The Ants.Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. Google Scholar

21.

Jervis MA, Ellers J, Harvey JA. 2008. Resource acquisition, allocation, and utilization in parasitoid reproductive strategies.Annual Review of Entomology53: 361–85. Google Scholar

22.

Mao N, Tang P, Tian HW, Shi M, Chen XX. 2016. General morphology and ultra-structure of the female reproductive apparatus of Trichomalopsis shirakii Crawford (Hymenoptera, Pteromalidae).Microscopy Research and Technique79: 625–636. Google Scholar

23.

Martins GF, Serrão JE. 2004. A comparative study of the ovaries in some Brazilian bees (Hymenoptera; Apoidea).Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia44: 45–53. Google Scholar

24.

Mundim FM, Bruna EM, Vieira-Neto EHM, Vasconcelos HL. 2012. Attack frequency and the tolerance to herbivory of Neotropical savanna trees.Oecologia16: 405–414. Google Scholar

25.

Okada Y, Miyazaki S, Miyakawa H, Ishikawa A, Tsuji K, Miura T. 2010. Ovarian development and insulin-signaling pathways during reproductive differentiation in the queenless ponerine ant Diacamma sp.Journal of Insect Physiology56: 288–295. Google Scholar

26.

Ortiz G, Camargo-Mathias MI. 2006. Morpho-physiological differences of the spermatheca of Attini ants (Hymenoptera: Myrmicinae).American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science1: 58–65. Google Scholar

27.

Ortiz G, Camargo-Mathias MI. 2007. Spermatheca of four species of ants of the tribe Attini (Hymenoptera: Myrmicinae). Morphological specialization.American Journal of Biological Sciences2: 5–12. Google Scholar

28.

Pabalan N, Davey KG, Packer L. 1996. Comparative morphology of spermathecae in solitary and primitively eusocial bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea).Canadian Journal of Zoology74: 802–808. Google Scholar

29.

Pascini TV, Martins GV. 2016. The insect spermatheca: an overview.Zoology121: 56–71. Google Scholar

30.

Patrício K, Cruz-Landim C. 2006. Ultrastructural aspects of the intercellular bridges between female bee germ cells.Brazilian Journal of Biology66: 309–315. Google Scholar

31.

Pearson JR, Zurita F, Tomás-Gallardo L, Díaz-Torres A, Díaz de la Loza MdC, Franze K, Martín-Bermudo MD, González-Reyes A. 2016. ECM-Regulator timp is required for stem cell niche organization and cyst production in the Drosophila ovary.PLoS ONE12: 1–25. Google Scholar

32.

Pinto-Tomás A, Anderson MA, Suen G, Stevenson DM, Chu FST, Cleland WW, Weimer PJ, Currie CR. 2009. Symbiotic nitrogen fixation in the fungus gardens of leaf-cutter ants.Science326: 1120–1123. Google Scholar

33.

Soares IMF, Della Lucia TMC, Pereira AS, Serrão JE, Ribeiro MMR, De Souza DJ. 2010. Comparative reproductive biology of the social parasite Acromyrmex ameliae De Souza, Soares & Della Lucia and of its host Acromyrmex subterraneus subterraneus Forel (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).Neotropical Entomology39: 714–719. Google Scholar

34.

Soares IMF, Della Lucia TMC, Santos AA, Nascimento IC, Delabie JHC. 2006. Caracterização de ninhos e tamanho de colônia de Acromyrmex rugosus (F. Smith) (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Attini) em restingas de Ilhéus, BA, Brasil.Revista Brasileira de Entomologia50: 128–130. Google Scholar

35.

Sousa-Souto L, Schoereder JH, Schaefer CE. 2007. Leaf-cutting ants, seasonal burning and nutrient distribution in Cerrado vegetation.Austral Ecology32: 758–765. Google Scholar

36.

Stacconi MVR, Romani R. 2011. Ultrastructural and functional aspects of the spermatheca in the American harlequin bug, murgantia histrionica (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae).Neotropical Entomology40: 222–230. Google Scholar

37.

Stefanini M, De Martino C, Zamboni L. 1967. Fixation of ejaculated spermatozoa for electron microscopy.Nature216: 173–174. Google Scholar

38.

Sternberg L, Pinzon MC, Moreira MZ, Moutinho P, Rojas EI, Herre EA. 2007. Plants use macronutrients accumulated in leaf-cutting ant nests.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London274: 315–321. Google Scholar

39.

Tsai JH, Perrier JL. 1996. Morphology of the digestive and reproductive systems of Dalbulus maidis and Graminella nigrifrons (Homoptera: Cicadellidae).Florida Entomologist79: 563–578. Google Scholar

40.

Tschinkel WR.1987. Relationship between ovariole number and spermathecal sperm count in ant queens: a new allometry.Annals of Entomological Society of America80: 208–211. Google Scholar

41.

Tschinkel WR, Porter SD. 1988. Efficiency of sperm use in queens of the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta (Hyenoptera: Formicidae).Annals of Entomological Society of America81: 777–781. Google Scholar

42.

Wheeler D, Krutzsch P. 1994. Ultrastructure of the spermatheca and its associated gland in the ant Crematogaster opuntiae (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).Zoomorphology114: 203–212. Google Scholar

43.

Wolfner MF.2011. Precious essences: female secretions promote sperm storage in Drosophila.PLoS Biology9: e1001191. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pbio.1001191 Google Scholar
Cliver Fernandes Farder-Gomes, Marco Antonio Oliveira, Terezinha Maria Castro Della Lucia, and José Eduardo Serrão "Morphology of the Ovary and Spermatheca of the Leafcutter Ant Acromyrmex rugosus Queens (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)," Florida Entomologist 102(3), 515-519, (30 September 2019). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.102.0312
Published: 30 September 2019
JOURNAL ARTICLE
5 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top