Translator Disclaimer
30 September 2019 Response to Enantiomers of (Z3Z9)-6,7-Epoxy-Octadecadiene, Sex Pheromone Component of Ectropis obliqua Prout (Lepidoptera: Geometridae): Electroantennagram Test, Field Trapping, and in Silico Study
Author Affiliations +

Limited information on sex pheromone recognition by tea moths, Ectropis obliqua Prout (Lepidoptera: Geometridae), exists for this economically important pest of tea (Camellia sinensis L.; Theaceae). Pheromone binding proteins (PBPs), a sub-family of odorant-binding proteins, control transportation of pheromone molecules that may contribute to the discrimination of sex pheromone components. It has been reported previously that EoblPBP1 gene (a pheromone binding protein of E. obliqua) is highly expressed in antennae of the male moth. Based on this information, a reliable model of EoblPBP1 was constructed by homology modeling using the enantiomers of Z3Z9-6,7-epo-18:Hy docked into the hydrophobic cavity of the model. Docking results suggested similar binding affinities of this enantiomer to EoblPBP1. However, electroantennogram and field trapping experiments of E. obliqua males revealed that response to Z3Z9-(6S,7R)-epo-18:Hy was significantly greater than the opposite configuration, and suggested enantiomeric discrimination could occur on sex pheromone receptors of this species of tea moth.

The tea geometrid, Ectropis obliqua Prout (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) is a serious defoliator of tea bushes, Camellia sinensis L. (Theaceae), in southeastern China. Outbreak populations of this phytophagous pest can completely defoliate a tea bush, thereby causing severe reduction of tea production with considerable economic damage (Hazarika et al. 2009; Zhang et al. 2014). Heavy application of synthetic pesticides are still widely used to control this pest, which can result in undesirable residues on tea leaves and soil causing adverse health and environmental effects (Hazarika et al. 2001; Ye et al. 2014). The use of mating disruption strategies that employ area-wide application of sex pheromones to manage E. obliqua populations has become a promising alternative to pesticide applications (Hazarika et al. 2009). Attempts to identify sex pheromones of E. obliqua began 30 yr ago, but the components still have not been accurately identified (Li et al. 1988; Yao et al. 1991; Liu et al. 1994). Yang et al. (2015) examined the bioactive compounds extracted from female sex pheromone glands of E. obliqua and identified them as Z3Z9-6,7-epo-18:Hy (major component) and Z3Z6Z9-18:Hy (secondary component) (Fig. 1A). These researchers also reported on the behavioral responses of male moths of this species to these components in wind-tunnel and field bioassays.

Insect sex pheromones are hydrophobic molecules, so odorant binding proteins are needed to transport these molecules across the hydrophilic antennal lymph to olfactory receptor neurons located in male sensilla (Gómez et al. 2008). Odorant binding proteins are a group of small, soluble proteins in the sensillum lymph and are regarded as a first-layer filter to differentiate odorant molecules. Based on amino acid sequences and structural characteristics, lepidopteran odorant binding proteins can be divided into several groups, including pheromone binding proteins (PBPs) and general odorant binding proteins (Pelosi & Maida 1995). Pheromone binding proteins mainly bind to insect sex pheromones, and are thought to be involved in pheromone reception processes (Sun et al. 2013a; Jin et al. 2014) while general odorant binding proteins are believed to detect plant volatiles and sex pheromones (Liu et al. 2015a). Although several crystalline structures of pheromone binding proteins have been characterized, cloning, expression, and identification of their component parts have proven to be expensive and time consuming. Homology modeling, based on comparison of target and templates, provides a promising alternative to predict protein structures (Venthur et al. 2014). The modeled structures of pheromone binding proteins have been reported in several Lepidoptera insects such as Bombyx mori L. (Lepidoptera: Bombycidae) (Gräter et al. 2006), lymantria dispar L. (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) (Honson et al. 2003), Spodoptera litura F. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) (Liu et al. 2012), and so on. Furthermore, the structures of pheromone binding proteins, prediction of binding site, clarification of binding mode, and interactions of protein-ligands can be performed by molecular docking and molecular dynamics (Mutis et al. 2014).

Fig. 1.

Sex pheromone components of Ectropis obliqua Prout. (A) sex pheromone components; (B) enantiomers of Z3Z9-6,7-epo-18:Hy.


Recently, 2 enantiomers of the major sex pheromone components produced by female E. obliqua: Z3Z9-(6R,7S)-epo-18:Hy (1) and Z3Z9-(6S,7R)-epo-18:Hy (2) (Fig. 1B) have been synthesized successfully in a previous study by the current authors including electroantennagram responses (Yu et al. 2017). Moreover identification, characterization of odorant binding proteins, and their expression patterns from E. obliqua also have been accomplished (Sun et al. 2017). The EoblPBP1 protein previously has been found to be highly expressed in antennae of male moths, and has provided us an opportunity to understand the sex pheromone recognition in this species (Ma et al. 2016a). We report here on results from electroantennograms and field trap collections to examine the attractiveness of Z3Z9-6,7-epo-18:Hy enantiomers of female E. obliqua to males. Furthermore, a homology modeling method was used to construct structures of EoblPBP1 protein and molecular docking used to investigate the binding affinities of the different sex pheromone enantiomers.

Materials and Methods


Moths were collected by sweep net from Dong-zhi County (30.1000°N, 117.0200°E), Anhui Province, People's Republic of China, and identified as E. obliqua (Yang et al. 2015). Insects were maintained in a plastic jar (240 mL) covered with nylon mesh and reared at 25 °C, 60% to 70% RH, and a 14:10 (L:D) photoperiod. Eggs collected from females were very carefully transferred to another jar, and maintained in dry conditions until hatching. Hatched larvae were reared on fresh tea leaves under ambient environmental conditions in our laboratory. After pupation, pupae were sexed and maintained on moist sand (10:1 sand:water) until emergence. Adults that emerged were maintained separately in 240 mL plastic jars(Fukang Plastic Co. Ltd., Dongguan, Guangdong, China) with 10% honey soaked in cotton ad libitum.


Z3Z6Z9-18:Hy (a triene, chemical purity > 98%) was prepared from linolenic acid as described previously by Liu et al. (1994). A mixture of 3 corresponding racemic monoepoxydienes of this triene was prepared by oxidation with m-chloroperbenzoic acid. Flash chromatography was performed on silica gel to obtain racemic Z3Z9-6,7-epo-18:Hy containing hexane:benzene (5:1). Enantiomers of Z3Z9-6,7-epo-18:Hy were synthesized with chemical purity > 95% and ee > 80% from cis-2-butene-1,4-diol as previously reported by Yu et al. (2017).


Electroantennagram recordings were conducted with an EAG 2014 system (Syntech Co., Hilversum, Netherlands) consisting of a probe/ micromanipulator (MP-15), a data acquisition interface box (serial IDAC-2), and a stimulus air controller (CS-55). Before electroantennagram measurements, the system was cleaned using an active charcoal purified stream of air. Male E. obliqua antennae were freshly excised from 1-d-old individuals, and mounted onto an antenna holder in the electroantennagram probe electrogel (Spectro 360, Parker Laboratory, Princeton, New Jersey). A continuous air stream (flow rate, 2 L per min) created by the stimulus air controller was allowed to flow toward the antenna. Epoxide racemate and enantiomers of Z3Z9-6,7-epo-18:Hy were dissolved in n-hexane to produce 1 mg per mL solutions. It has been reported that (Z)-3-hexenol can elicit stable electroantennagram responses to antenna of male E. obliqua (Sun et al. 2014). Therefore, 10 µL (Z)-3-hexenol solution (0.005µg per µL) was used as the reference stimuli and 10 µL of n-hexane used as the solvent control (Luo et al. 2017). Ten µL of each test solution was placed on a small strip of qualitative filter paper (0.5 × 2.5 cm, fast-speed type; Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) and allowed to evaporate for 30 s. At this time, the strip was introduced into a Pasteur pipette (Jiechen Instruments Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China) (15 cm long) with its tip inserted into the tubing (8 mm in diam) up to 8 cm before the exit of the continuous air stream. The base of the pipette was connected to the pulsed air stream from the stimulus air controller. Stimuli with the test chemicals were provided to the insect antennae by puffing pulsed air for 0.3 s (flow rate, 2 L per min) at the base of the pipette. Each recording was repeated 6 times with different antennae in the following sequence: n-hexane, reference compound, test compound (3 times), reference compound, and n-hexane. Control-adjusted electroantennagram responses of the stimuli were presented as proportional responses relative to the reference stimuli (Zhang et al. 2014). Mean data were analyzed using a 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by LSD multiple comparison test. Differences were considered significant at P < 0.05.


Field trapping experiments were conducted in a tea orchard in Xian-Ning (29.8700°N, 114.2800°E), Hubei, China, during May 2016. A pheromone-baited water pan trap was used in all field experiments (Fig. 2). Traps were baited with synthetic compounds in a 4:6 ratio of triene; 6,7-epoxide enantiomers were injected into a green rubber septa (6 mm OD; Pherobio Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) that was suspended at 1.3 m from ground surface and spaced 10 m apart. Pheromone compounds were dissolved in distilled hexane to produce 1 mg per mL solutions and 10 µL of total volume injected into a blank septa. Septa injected with distilled hexane were used as a control. All septa were stored at 4 °C until use. Each treatment had 8 replicates, and trap positions within each replicate were randomized. Trap catches were checked the next d. Statistical significance of the differences between treatments was assessed by 1-way ANOVA, followed by Duncan multiple range test (P < 0.05).

Fig. 2.

Field trial of Ectropis obliqua Prout. (A) Water pan trap; (B) male moths captured.



A BLAST search (Altschul et al. 1990) of the amino acid sequence of EoblPBP1 was conducted against the current Protein Data Bank database ( to find structural templates. In this case, the crystalline structure of BmorPBP (Protein Data Bank ID: 1DQE) at a resolution of 1.8 Å was chosen as the template for EoblPBP1. Multiple sequence alignment was generated using the DNAMAN 8 software program (Lynnon Biosoft, San Ramon, California, USA). Using sequence alignments and the software template, Modeller 9.18 (Šali & Blundell 1993) was used to construct a 3-dimensional structure of EoblPBP1 using a comparative protein modeling method (i.e., homology modeling). Ten candidates were generated by Modeller and the structure with the lowest DOPE (Discrete Optimized Protein Energy) score was chosen as a solution. To refine the protein, the relax module of program Rosetta was used to give final structure of the target protein (Das & Baker 2008).


The structures of female E. obliqua sex pheromone components, Z3Z9-6,7-epo-18:Hy (6S,7R- and 6R,7S- enantiomer), were created and optimized using chemBio3D Ultra 13 (PerkinElmer, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA). Molecules were applied with MM2 forcefield and saved in a Protein Data Bank format. The Protein Data Bank files were uploaded to AutoDockTools (The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, USA) and saved as PDBQT format for docking. The AutoDockTools software was used also to assign polar hydrogens and add Gasteiger charges to the protein, then the structure saved in PDBQT file format. After preparation of protein and ligands, structures were docked into the model of EoblPBP1 using the AutoDock Vina 1.1.2 software (The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, USA). A docking grid with a size of 18 Å × 18 Å × 18 Å was used, and the grid center was set at 7.332 (X-axis), 22.972 (Y-axis), 3.629 (Z-axis). Free energy scores for ligands were calculated, and the lowest energy of the ligand-protein complexes was selected for analysis.


In the laboratory electroantennagram bioassays, male E. obliqua antennal response to 6S,7R-enantiomer was at the same level as epoxide racemate, but significantly greater than responses to the 6R,7S-enantiomer (P < 0.05) (Fig. 3). The results suggest that (6R,7S)-enantio-mer may not be the effective configuration.

In the field trapping experiment, the number of E. obliqua males captured in water pan traps was significantly greater for the 6S,7R-enantiomer (blend A) compared with 6R,7S-enantiomer (blend B) and control (P < 0.05) (Fig. 4).

Electroantennagram and field trapping results suggested a chiral discrimination of 1 or more particular proteins at the molecular level. In order to understand the interaction between sex pheromone molecules and the protein, structural information of EoblPBP1 was needed. Currently, there are no NMR or X-ray data for EoblPBP1. Therefore, based on the templates and our alignment results, the 3D model of EoblPBP1 was successfully generated. After refinement, the Verify Score of models by Profiles-3D was 65.13 (theoretical score 66.0542 and 29.7244) for EoblPBP1, implying that overall quality of the predicted EoblPBP1 structure was reliable. In addition, the Ramachandran plot of EoblPBP1 revealed that 95.8% of the residues were in the favored region, 4.2% of the residues were in the allowed region, and none were in the disallowed region (Fig. 5C).

Results of the predicted 3D structure showed that EoblPBP1 is compact and a stable globular protein that contains 6 α-helical domains: α1 (residues Glu6–Glu26), α2 (residues Ile32–Asn38), α3 (residues Pro49–Leu62), α4 (residues His76–His82), α5 (residues Asp86–Ser103), and α6 (residues Arg109–Leu127) (Fig. 5B). All 6 antiparallel α-helices form a compact hydrophobic binding pocket. Although there still are several hydrophilic amino acids inside the binding cavity, Thr117 and Arg121 interacted with the epoxy ring of ligands. Not surprisingly, 3 pairs of disulphide bridges were found in the structure that was confirmed to be a common feature of insect pheromone binding proteins.

Fig. 3.

Electroantennagram responses of male Ectropis obliqua Prout antenna to racemate and enantiomers of Z3Z9-6,7-epo-18:Hy. Data are mean ± SD (n = 6) of male E. obliqua antennal responses by 2 enantiomers and racemate of Z3Z9-6,7-epo-18:Hy: Z3Z9-6S,7R-epoxy-18:H, Z3Z9-6R,7S-epoxy-18:H, racemate.


Fig. 4.

Pan trap catches of male Ectropis obliqua Prout baited with binary blends of racemic and enantiomers of Z3Z9-6,7-epo-18:Hy with triene in Xian-Ning County, China. (A) Z3Z9-6S,7R-epoxy-18:H (6 µg) + Z3Z6Z9-18:H (4 µg); (B) Z3Z9-6R,7S-epoxy-18:H (6 µg) + Z3Z6Z9-18:H (4 µg); (C) blank lure (control). Data are mean ± SD (n = 8) of male E. obliqua trap catches in Xian-Ning County, China, May 2016 by 3 different combinations compared with water pan trap.


We found no discrimination between EoblPBP1 and ligands in our docking experiments, although the results showed that orientation and conformation of Z3Z9-6,7-epo-18:Hy enantiomers were clear. Two enantiomers were anchored in the same binding cavity with opposite epoxy ring orientation (Fig. 6C), surrounded by hydrophobic amino acids. No expected H-bonds were formed between Thr 117, Arg 121, and ligands (Figs. 6A, B). Van der Waals and hydrophobic interactions were important linkages between EoblPBP1 and epoxide ligands. When Z3Z9-6S,7R-epoxy-18:H was docked into the protein, the distance of oxygen in the epoxy ring and hydroxyl hydrogen in Thr 117 was found to be 4.5 Å (Fig. 6D). Moreover, interaction energies between ligands and EoblPBP1 confirm that Z3Z9-6S,7R-epoxy-18:H and Z3Z9-6R,7S-epoxy-18:H have similar binding affinity, though Z3Z9-6R,7S-epoxy-18:H has a lower energy value and is predicted to bind better than the opposite configuration (Table 1).

Fig. 5.

Modeled 3D structure and validation of EoblPBP1. (A) Sequence alignment of EoblPBP1 and template 1DQE_A. α-helices are displayed as squiggles. Identical residues are highlighted in white letters with deep blue background. (B) Overall structure of the EoblPBP1. Three disulfide bonds are in red. N-terminus, C-terminus, and α-helices are labeled. Two potential key residues: Thr117 and Arg 121 are in orange. (C) Ramachandran plot of EoblPBP1.


Fig. 6.

Results of docking Z3Z9-6S,7R-epoxy-18:H and Z3Z9-6R,7S-epoxy-18:H into predicted model of EoblPBP1. (A) Orientation of Z3Z9-6R,7S-epoxy-18:H in protein EoblPBP1. Supposed key residues are in red and labeled. (B) Orientation of Z3Z9-6S,7R-epoxy-18:H in protein EoblPBP1. Supposed key residues are in red and labeled. (C) Alignment of 2 enantiomers in different binding conformation. (D) The distance between oxygen in epoxy ring (Z3Z9-6S,7R-epoxy-18:H) and hydroxyl hydrogen in Thr 117 is labeled in yellow dotted line.



We found that the 6R,7S-enantiomer consistently produced a lower response and captured fewer male E. obliqua; this was caused by the presence of a “wrong” enantiomer. In this case, enantio-enriched but not enantio-pure Sharpless asymmetric epoxidation had occurred. Previously, epoxidation has been reported to account for 5% or more “incorrect” enantiomer synthesis (Katsuki & Sharpless 1980). We believe that a lower response of the 6R,7S-enantiomer could have been caused by the presence of trace amounts of 6S,7R-enantiomer. Mori (2007) investigated the stereochemistry-bioactivity relationships among pheromones and classified them into 10 categories. Based on our electroantennagram and field trapping results with that of Kenji's investigation (Mori 2007), we could assume that 6S,7R-enantiomer is bioactive, and its opposite enantiomer does not inhibit or promote a response in male E. obliqua. This is the most common relationship with about 60% of chiral pheromones belonging to this group. Pheromones in this category can be used as their racemates in practical applications (Mori 2007). Recently, Z3,Z9-6,7-epoxy-18:H and Z3,Z6,Z9-18:H also has been identified as a component of sex pheromone in Ectropis grisescens Warren (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) (Ma et al. 2016b). In a related study, Z3,Z9-6,7-epoxy-19:H was identified as a key substance which caused premating isolation of the 2 sibling moths: E. grisescens and E. obliqua (Luo et al. 2017). All of the reports were based on the racemate of Z3,Z9-6,7-epoxy-18:H. Considering the important role chirality plays, it is possible that these 2 sibling moths use different bioactive enantiomers as components of their sex pheromones that serve as an avenue of reproductive isolation.

Table 1.

Binding affinities of different enantiomers.


In 2 recent silico studies by Sun et al. (2013b) and Liu et al. (2015b), male moths of E. obliqua, EoblPBP1 was proven to be specifically expressed (and dramatically detected) in their antennae, and shared a similar tissue expression pattern with pheromone binding protein genes in other moths. These results suggested a clear implication of male E. obliqua attractiveness in response to female-produced sex pheromones of this species (Sun et al. 2017). Therefore, a predicted 3D model could be built and used to investigate the binding mode of the different epoxide enantiomers.

In conclusion, silico interaction between ligands and EoblPBP1 should be confirmed by further X-ray crystallography studies. We believe that the knowledge we generated regarding the molecular interactions of EoblPBP1 supports the use of these sex pheromones for pest management in the field. Complementary experimental assays, such as competitive binding assays and site-directed mutagenesis, could validate the results obtained in our experiments to facilitate further research into the olfaction mechanism of E. obliqua males. Such investigations would serve to support alternative pest control strategies through design and development of novel pheromone analogs, as well as inhibitors of pheromone degradation.


This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31200490), National Modern Agriculture Technology System (CARS-23), and Anhui Major Demonstration Project for Leading Talent Team on Tea Chemistry and Health. The senior author expresses his appreciation for the time spent at Mie University, Japan, with best wishes to Hirokata Katsuzaki and his team.

References Cited


Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. Journal of Molecular Biology 215: 403–410. Google Scholar


Das R, Baker D. 2008. Macromolecular modeling with rosetta. Annual Review of Biochemistry 77: 363–382. Google Scholar


Gómez VRC, Carrasco JV. 2008. Morphological characteristics of antennal sensilla in Talponia batesi (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 101: 181–188. Google Scholar


Gräter F, Xu W, Leal W, Grubmüller H. 2006. Pheromone discrimination by the pheromone-binding protein of Bombyx mori. Structure 14: 1577–1586. Google Scholar


Hazarika LK, Bhuyan M, Hazarika BN. 2009. Insect pests of tea and their management. Annual Review of Entomology 54: 267–284. Google Scholar


Hazarika L, Puzari K, Wahab S. 2001. Biological control of tea pests, pp. 159–180 In Upadhyay RK, Mukerji KG, Chamola BP [eds.], Biocontrol Potential and Its Exploitation in Sustainable Agriculture. Springer, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. Google Scholar


Honson N, Johnson MA, Oliver JE, Prestwich GD, Plettner E. 2003. Structure-activity studies with pheromone-binding proteins of the gypsy moth, lymantria dispar. Chemical Senses 28: 479–489. Google Scholar


Jin JY, Li ZQ, Zhang YN, Liu NY, Dong SL. 2014. Different roles suggested by sex-biased expression and pheromone binding affinity among three pheromone binding proteins in the pink rice borer, Sesamia inferens (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Insect Physiology 66: 71–79. Google Scholar


Katsuki T, Sharpless KB. 1980. The first practical method for asymmetric epoxidation. Journal of the American Chemical Society 102: 5974–5976. Google Scholar


Li Z, Yao E, Luo Z, Liu T, Shang Z, Liu Z, Wang S. 1988. Preliminary structural elucidation of sex pheromone components of two geometrids in China: Semiothisa cinerearia Bremer & Crey and Ectropic obliqua Prout, pp. 29–32 In Proceedings of the China-Japan Seminar on Insect Semiochemicals, 6–8 Oct 1988, Beijing, China. Google Scholar


Liu NY, He P, Dong SL. 2012. Binding properties of pheromone-binding protein 1 from the common cutworm Spodoptera litura. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 161: 295–302. Google Scholar


Liu NY, Yang K, Liu Y, Xu W, Anderson A, Dong SL. 2015a. Two general-odorant binding proteins in Spodoptera litura are differentially tuned to sex pheromones and plant odorants. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology 180: 23–31. Google Scholar


Liu NY, Yang F, Yang K, He P, Niu XH, Xu W, Anderson A, Dong SL. 2015b. Two subclasses of odorant-binding proteins in Spodoptera exigua display structural conservation and functional divergence. Insect Molecular Biology 24: 167–182. Google Scholar


Liu T, Li Z, Luo Z, Jiang Y, Yao E. 1994. Synthesis of some bioactive components on Ectropis obliqua sex pheromone. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Nankaiensis 1: 82–85. Google Scholar


Luo Z, Li Z, Cai X, Bian L, Chen Z. 2017. Evidence of premating isolation between two sibling moths: Ectropis grisescens and Ectropis obliqua (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Journal of Economic Entomology 110: 2364–2370. Google Scholar


Ma L, Li ZQ, Bian L, Cai XM, Luo ZX, Zhang YJ, Chen ZM. 2016a. Identification and comparative study of chemosensory genes related to host selection by legs transcriptome analysis in the tea geometrid Ectropis obliqua. PloS One 11: e0149591. Google Scholar


Ma T, Xiao Q, Yu YG, Wang C, Zhu CQ, Sun ZH, Chen XY, Wen XJ. 2016b. Analysis of tea geometrid (Ectropis grisescens) pheromone gland extracts using GC-EAD and GC×GC/TOFMS. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 64: 3161–3166. Google Scholar


Mori K. 2007. Significance of chirality in pheromone science. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry 15: 7505–7523. Google Scholar


Mutis A, Palma R, Venthur H, Iturriaga-Vásquez P, Faundez-Parraguez M, Mella-Herrera R, Kontodimas D, Lobos C, Quiroz A. 2014. Molecular characterization and in silico analysis of the pheromone-binding protein of the European grapevine moth lobesia botrana (Denis & Schiffermüller) (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae). Neotropical Entomology 43: 266–275. Google Scholar


Pelosi P, Maida R. 1995. Odorant-binding proteins in insects. Comparative Biochemistry & Physiology Part B: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 111: 503–514. Google Scholar


Šali A, Blundell TL. 1993. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. Journal of Molecular Biology 234: 779–815. Google Scholar


Sun L, Mao TF, Zhang YX, Wu JJ, Bai JH, Zhang YN, Jiang XC, Yin KS, Guo YY, Zhang YJ. 2017. Characterization of candidate odorant-binding proteins and chemosensory proteins in the tea geometrid Ectropis obliqua Prout (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology 94: e21383. Google Scholar


Sun M, Liu Y, Walker WB, Liu C, Lin K, Gu S, Zhang Y, Zhou J, Wang G. 2013a. Identification and characterization of pheromone receptors and interplay between receptors and pheromone binding proteins in the diamondback moth, Plutella xyllostella. PloS One 8: e62098. Google Scholar


Sun M, Liu Y, Wang G. 2013b. Expression patterns and binding properties of three pheromone binding proteins in the diamondback moth, Plutella xyllotella . Journal of Insect Physiology 59: 46–55. Google Scholar


Sun XL, Wang GC, Gao Y, Zhang XZ, Xin ZJ, Chen ZM. 2014. Volatiles emitted from tea plants infested by Ectropis oblique larvae are attractive to conspecific moths. Journal of Chemical Ecology 40: 1080–1089. Google Scholar


Venthur H, Mutis A, Zhou JJ, Quiroz A. 2014. Ligand binding and homology modelling of insect odorant-binding proteins. Physiological Entomology 39: 183–198. Google Scholar


Yang Y, Zhang L, Guo F, Long Y, Wang Y, Wan X. 2015. Reidentification of sex pheromones of tea geometrid Ectropis obliqua Prout (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Journal of Economic Entomology 109: 167–175. Google Scholar


Yao EY, Li ZM, Lou ZQ, Shang ZZ, Yin KS, Hong BB. 1991. Report on structural elucidation of sex pheromone components of a tea pest (Ectropis obliqua Prout). Progress in Natural Science 6: 452–454. Google Scholar


Ye GY, Xiao Q, Chen M, Chen XX, Yuan ZJ, Stanley DW, Hu C. 2014. Tea: biological control of insect and mite pests in China. Biological Control 68: 73–91. Google Scholar


Yu J, Guo F, Yang YQ, Gao HH, Hou RY, Wan XC. 2017. Synthesis of the enantiomers of (3Z, 9Z)-cis-6, 7-epoxy-3, 9-octadecadiene, one of the major components of the sex pheromone of Ectropis obliqua Prout. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 28: 758–761. Google Scholar


Zhang GH, Yuan ZJ, Zhang CX, Yin KS, Tang MJ, Guo HW, Fu JY, Xiao Q. 2014. Detecting deep divergence in seventeen populations of tea geometrid (Ectropis obliqua Prout) in China by COI mtDNA and cross-breeding. PloS One 9: e99373. Google Scholar
Feng Guo, Jie Yu, Yunqiu Yang, and Xiaochun Wan "Response to Enantiomers of (Z3Z9)-6,7-Epoxy-Octadecadiene, Sex Pheromone Component of Ectropis obliqua Prout (Lepidoptera: Geometridae): Electroantennagram Test, Field Trapping, and in Silico Study," Florida Entomologist 102(3), 549-554, (30 September 2019).
Published: 30 September 2019

Back to Top