Translator Disclaimer
8 April 2020 Insecticidal Compounds in Ricinus communis L. (Euphorbiaceae) to Control Melanaphis sacchari Zehntner (Hemiptera: Aphididae)
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The sugarcane aphid, Melanaphis sacchari Zehntner (Hemiptera: Aphididae), is recognized as an important pest of sorghum cultivation. The use of natural products in the form of botanical extracts represents an alternative for its control. In this investigation, we evaluated the insecticidal activity of hexanic, acetonic, and methanolic extracts of leaves, fruits, and roots of Ricinus communis L. (Euphorbiaceae). These were applied in contact bioassays at different concentrations to control apterous adults of M. sacchari. We found that the chemical components of lower polarity contained in the hexane extract of leaves (RcLH) produced the best biological effect, with 96% mortality at 72 h. Thin layer chromatography allowed fractions of this extract to be grouped into 7 categories (F1–F7) based on their chemical content. The F3 category produced 90% mortality at 10,000 ppm at 72 h in contact bioassays. The 1H and 13C nuclear magnetic resonance analysis in addition to the gas chromatography-mass spectrometry of F3 revealed the presence of myristic and stearic acid. Our results showed that the hexanic extracts of R. communis and their fatty acids may be an alternative for the development of new insecticides, constituting a better option in terms of effectiveness and lower toxicity compared with the synthetic products currently on the market used for their control.

Worldwide the USA and Mexico are the most important producers of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor [L.] Moench; Poaceae) (FIRA 2016). Historically, this ancient commodity is one of the most important cereals for animal feed (Chuck-Hernández et al. 2011). Melanaphis sacchari Zehntner (Hemiptera: Aphididae) is an economically important insect in many areas of Africa, Asia, Australia, and the Far East, but it is a severe sorghum pest in the USA and Mexico (Singh et al. 2004).

In 1970, M. sacchari entered the USA as a pest of sugar cane (Schenck & Lehrer 2000). By 2013, outbreaks of this pest were found in sorghum crops causing economic losses in North America (Armstrong et al. 2015). Although the buds of sugar cane can be infested with M. sacchari, no significant damage occurs to that crop (Medina et al. 2017). However, damage to sorghum by this aphid is considerably more serious. About 20 US states and sorghum-producing areas in Mexico have suffered severe damage since the introduction of this pest in 2013 (Bowling et al. 2016; Harris-Shultz et al. 2017). According to Nibouche et al. (2018) the change of host from sugar cane to sorghum may be due to a change in host preference, or the arrival of a new biotype of yellow aphid specializing in sorghum.

In Mexico, chemical insecticides such as neonicotinoids have been used to control this aphid (Tejeda-Reyes et al. 2017). The negative effects of these chemical compounds on human health have been reported (Müller et al. 2005), and they have been implicated in bee colony collapse (Medrzycki et al. 2003). In view of this situation, it is necessary to search for new alternatives for the control of agronomic pests, such as those from botanical extracts that are generally more environmentally friendly and less damaging to the health of humans as well as other non-target organisms (Isman 2008).

A plant species of possible interest for use to control M. sacchari is Ricinus communis L. (Euphorbiaceae), commonly known as “higueril-la.” This plant is native to Africa, although some authors suggest that it may have originated from India or China (Worbs et al. 2011). Currently, this plant species is widely distributed worldwide and has many industrial, ornamental, and medicinal applications (Rana et al. 2012). To date, a total of 83 compounds have been isolated from various parts of R. communis, including alkaloids, terpenoids, flavonoids, benzoic acid derivatives, coumarins, tocopherols, and fatty acids. These compounds have demonstrated cytotoxic, insecticidal, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant activity, and anti-asthmatic properties, among others (Ribeiro et al. 2016). We report here our investigations with polarity extracts of leaves, fruits, and roots of R. communis for their insecticidal effectiveness against M. sacchari, and to identify active compounds responsible for their bioactivity.

Materials and Methods

PREPARATION AND ANALYSIS OF PLANT EXTRACTS

Leaves, fruits, and roots of R. communis were collected in the community of Yautepec, Morelos, Mexico (18.8248611°N, 99.0963333°W) in Jan 2018. A specimen of the plant was identified by M.C. Gabriel Flores Franco, specialist taxonomist, at the Herbarium of the Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Conservación, at the Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, México, where it was deposited under catalog number 34874.

Prior to extraction, 100 g of leaves, 50 g of fruit, and 150 g of R. communis roots were dried outdoors in the shade for 15 d. Each plant part was macerated consecutively in 500 mL of 3 solvents of ascending polarity (n-hexane, acetone, and methanol) for 72 h. This process was conducted in triplicate. The solvent was removed by distillation under reduced pressure using a rotary evaporator (Buchi 205, Flawil, Switzerland). Extracts obtained were named depending on the solvent and part used: n-hexane extracts: leaf, fruit, and root; acetone extracts: leaf, fruit, and root; methanol extracts: leaf, fruit, and root.

The n-hexane leaf extract showed a higher mortality of aphids (96%), compared with the extracts of acetone (56%) and methanol (54%), and was further investigated to determine the bioactive components. Seven g were fractionated in a glass column previously packed with 60 g of silica gel 70–230 mesh (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). A gradient of n-hexane and ethyl acetate was used as the mobile phase, starting with 100% n-hexane and ending with 100% of the solvent of higher polarity, collecting 10 mL samples at each gradient. This process was monitored by thin layer chromatography. Thin layer chromatography was used to obtain fractions based on chemical content into 7 categories (F1–F7): F1 (2.4 g, 95:5), F2 (0.69 g, 90:10), F3 (1.5 g, 85:15), F4 (0.64 g, 80:20), F5 (0.13 g, 50:50), F6 (0.16 g, 30:70), and F7 (0.19 g, 100% ethyl acetate), then subsequently evaluated in contact bioassays described later.

The most active fraction (F3, 1.5 g) isolated from n-hexane extract: leaf was subjected to a column chromatographic fractionation packed with silica gel (25 g, 70–230 mesh, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). A gradient of n-hexane and ethyl acetate was used as the mobile phase, starting with 100% n-hexane and ending with 100% ethyl acetate. A total of 433 mg of a fraction obtained from F3 was separated in a reverse phase column packed with silica gel (1 g, RP-18, 40–63 µm, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) with water and acetonitrile as the mobile phase. Analysis of F3 using thin layer chromatography revealed, with Komarovsky reagent, the presence of 2 major products: myristic acid (25.4 mg) and stearic acid (26.3 mg). These were subsequently identified by nuclear magnetic resonance spectra recorded on a Bruker Advance III HD-600 at 600 MHz for 1H nuclear magnetic resonance and 13C nuclear magnetic resonance in CDCl3. The mass-coupled gas chromatograph data was obtained using an Agilent 5975C equipped with a long-duration ion multiplier triple-axis detector in electronic impact mode.

BIOASSAYS

Laboratory colonized adult M. sacchari maintained in a greenhouse at Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Conservación, at the Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, México were used in this study. Insects were maintained at the optimum temperature for insect reproduction of 25 ± 2 °C and fed hybrid sorghum variety M550 (Majestic Seeds Co., Hodges, South Carolina, USA).

Contact bioassays consisted of placing a 5 × 5 cm sorghum leaf into a 30 cm3 plastic Petri dish with filter paper on the bottom. One mL of distilled water was added to prevent the sorghum leaf from drying out. Ten M. sacchari were placed on a leaf using a camel hair brush. Ten µL of Tween 20 (0.2%) was added to each of the n-hexane and acetone extracts to allow them to be homogenized in 2 mL of water. A standard airbrush (Truper® Aero-35, Estado de México, México) was used to spray 0.15 mL of each mixture at concentrations of 2,500, 5,000, and 10,000 ppm onto the aphids. Two replicates were carried out with 5 repetitions per extract concentration in a completely randomized design. Percent aphid mortality was recorded at 24, 48, and 72 h after treatment. The synthetic chemical insecticide Confial® (active ingredient: 1% imidacloprid) and Tween 20 (0.2%) were used as controls.

STATISTICS

Mean percent mortality data were arcsine transformed prior to statistical analysis using an initial ANOVA test within a randomized study design. Post-hoc comparison of means was carried out using the Tukey test at (P ≤ 0.05) using SAS 9.0 (SAS 2002). Untransformed means are presented.

Results

The yield of R. communis leaves, fruit, and root obtained from the extracts were as follows: n-hexane leaf (8%), fruit (2%), and root (0.5%); acetone leaf (2%), fruit (4%), root (0.9%); methanol leaf (16%), fruit (4%), and root (3.8%). In general, hexane extracts provided the highest mortality (96%) at 10,000 ppm at 72 h (Table 1). Aphid mortality between 5,000 and 10,000 ppm was not significantly different during this period of time. At 10,000 ppm, hexane leaf mortality was not significantly different from that of hexane root and fruit, and the positive control, imidacloprid, at 72 h. At 48 h, hexane leaf at 5,000 and 10,000 ppm also showed no significant difference compared with the positive control, exhibiting mortalities of 70 and 94%, respectively. In the same way, hexane fruit and root at 10,000 ppm were not significantly different from the positive control at 48 h.

Table 1.

Mean percent mortality (± SD) of apterous Melanaphis sacchari from contact bioassays of various hexane extracts of Ricinus communis plant parts.

img-z3-4_91.gif

All acetone extracts were less effective compared with hexane extracts (Table 2). At 10,000 ppm, acetone leaf and root had the highest aphid mortality (56%), and were significantly lower than the positive control. On the other hand, it was observed that the percentage of mortality at 48 h of the 3 treatments was below 50%, with the exception of acetone root at 10,000 ppm, which had a mortality of 52%. Statistically, no treatment was as effective as the positive control (imidacloprid). Methanolic extracts of R. communis were also less effective than the hexane and acetone extracts (Table 3).

Of all the fractions evaluated, F3 was statistically equal at all concentrations in effectiveness compared with imidacloprid (Fig. 1). The F3 category consisted of myristic and stearic acids. The 1H nuclear magnetic resonance analysis of this fraction showed 4 multiple signals of δ 0.89 to 2.30 ppm, characteristic of fatty acids, and was confirmed with 13C nuclear magnetic resonance spectra by δ signals 13.82 to 43.81. In addition, the presence of a carbonyl confirmed the presence of these acids. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis yielded the following data: tetradecanoic (myristic) acid (6.8 min, 228 uma [M] + for C14H28O2) and octadecanoic (stearic) acid (8.4 min, m / z 284 uma [M + H] + C18H36O2).

Table 2.

Mean percent mortality (± SD) of apterous M. sacchari from contact bioassays of various acetonic extracts of Ricinus communis plant parts.

img-z3-12_91.gif

Discussion

The yellow aphid M. sacchari is an invasive species and the most important pest associated with sorghum cultivation. This insect has caused economic losses to farmers in the USA and Mexico, the top producers worldwide of this crop. The use of insecticides of synthetic origin represents the most effective option for their control because they are broad spectrum. The search for botanical alternatives for the control of M. sacchari is necessary because the use of bioinsecticides represents a more friendly option for the environment while minimizing the adverse impact to non-target organisms. Plants can defend themselves against the attack of aphids by producing secondary metabolites that can be used to control these insects. Ricinus communis is an interesting plant species with documented insecticidal activity (Rana et al. 2012). However, a literature search revealed little to no information regarding the use of extracts from this species for control of M. sacchari. Thus, to our knowledge, this is the first report on this subject. In our study, it was shown that hexane extracts from different parts of R. communis resulted in the highest mortality, compared with other extracts that were bioassayed with rates of 88 to 96% mortality occurring at 10,000 ppm, 78 to 94% at 5,000 ppm, and 60 to 76% at 2,500 ppm at 72 h. This is consistent with previous reports of other plant species for control of aphids. For example, Ateyyat and Abu-Darwish (2009) evaluated hexane bark extracts of Rhamnus dispermus (Ehrenb. ex Boiss.) (Rhamnaceae) to control the aphid Pterochloroides persicae (Cholodkovsky) (Hemiptera: Aphididae), reporting 40% mortality at 10,000 ppm in 72 h. Moreover, results of our investigation during the 48-h time period revealed insecticidal activity with ranges from 78 to 94% at 10,000 ppm, 32 to 70% at 5,000 ppm, and 38 to 42% at 2,500 ppm. This is similar to previous studies, such as that of Arya et al. (2014), who tested the oil ether extracts of R. communis seeds to control the aphid Lipaphis erysimi (Kaltenbach) (Hemiptera: Aphididae) with concentrations of 10,000 ppm and 5,000 ppm causing 100% and 75% mortality, respectively, in 48 h. Hewage et al. (1997) reported that the hexane extract of Pleiospermium alatum (Wight & Arn.) Swingle (Rutaceae) produced 90% mortality at 4,000 ppm at 48 h for the aphid Aphis craccivora (Koch) (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Another investigation, conducted by Rodríguez et al. (2012), demonstrated that oil ether extracts from Picrasma crenata (Vell.) Engl. (Simaroubaceae) produced 75% mortality at 6,000 ppm at 48 h in Myzus persicae Sulzer (Hemiptera: Aphididae).

Table 3.

Mean percent mortality (± SD) of apterous Melanaphis sacchari from contact bioassays of various methanolic extracts of Ricinus communis plant parts.

img-z4-4_91.gif

Fig. 1.

Mean percent mortality (± SD) of apterous Melanaphis sacchari from contact bioassays of various hexane leaf fractions and concentrations of Ricinus communis at 72 h compared with imidacloprid as a positive control. Means with different letters for each fraction were significantly different, Tukey's multiple comparison test (P ≤ 0.05).

img-z4-8_91.jpg

Our studies showed that the insecticidal action of hexane extracts 24 h after application of the treatments exerted an insecticidal effect, with mortality rates of 60 to 76% at 10,000 ppm and 22 to 50% at 5,000 ppm. These rates were similar to those published by Singh et al. (1988) to control the mustard aphid, L. erysimi, where hexane extracts from seeds of Azadirachta indica (A. Juss) (Meliaceae) produced 48% mortality at 5,000 ppm in 24 h. In addition, an investigation by Nia et al. (2015) showed that the Artemisia herba-alba (Asso) (Asteraceae) petroleum ether extract produced 40% mortality at 10,000 ppm in 24 h for the aphid M. persicae.

Considering that the cuticle of aphids is mainly composed of alkyl esters, the methyl esters of fatty acids, triacylglycerides, and free fatty acids (Brey et al. 1985), it is possible that the effectiveness of hexane extracts is due to the chemical affinity of low-polarity compounds present in the extract with the aphid cuticle. In contrast, the acetone and methanol extracts produced low mortality rates due to low affinity toward the fatty body of M. sacchari.

Our bio-directed study led us to the identification of 2 major fatty acids (myristic acid and stearic acid) which were present in the F3 fraction of hexane leaf. This mixture possessed the highest mortality (90%) at 10,000 ppm in 72 h. These 2 fatty acids had been identified previously in R. communis (Bigi et al. 2004; Ramos-Lopez et al. 2012). We are not aware of reports on the insecticidal activity of these 2 fatty acids for control of aphids. In conclusion, hexane extracts were found to possess very effective insecticides for control of M. sacchari. Ricinus communis may represent a plausible avenue in the development of novel biorationale products for agronomic crop pest control for control of aphids.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to the Programa para el Desarrollo Profesional Docente de México (PRODEP) for the scholarship provided to the first author (PRODEP-511-6 / 17-6413 / UAGro-219). This article is part of the thesis for a Doctorate in Natural Sciences of the Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos by the first author, C. Sotelo-Leyva. The last author, A. Zamilpa, expresses appreciation to the IMSS Foundation.

References Cited

1.

Armstrong JS, Rooney WL, Peterson GC, Villanueva RT, Brewer MJ, Sekula-Ortiz D. 2015. Sugarcane aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae): host range and sorghum resistance including cross-resistance from greenbug sources. Journal of Economic Entomology 108: 576–582. Google Scholar

2.

Arya H, Sing BR, Singh K. 2014. Insecticidal activity of petroleum ether extract of castor seeds against mustard aphid Lipaphis erysimi Kaltenbach. Advances in Bioresearch 5: 165–168. Google Scholar

3.

Ateyyat MA, Abu-Darwish MS. 2009. Short communication. Insecticidal activity of different extracts of Rhamnus dispermus (Rhamnaceae) against peach trunk aphid, Pterochloroides persicae (Homoptera: Lachnidae). Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 7: 160–164. Google Scholar

4.

Bigi MA, Torkomian LV, de Groote TCS, Hebling MJ, Bueno OC, Pagnocca FC, Fernandes JB, Vieira PC, da Silva MF. 2004. Activity of Ricinus communis (Euphorbiaceae) and ricinine against the leaf-cutting ant Atta sexdens rubropilosa (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and the symbiotic fungus Leucoagaricus gongylophorus. Pest Management Science 60: 933–938. Google Scholar

5.

Bowling RD, Brewer MJ, Kerns DL, Gordy JN, Seiter NE, Elliott NM, Buntin GD, Way MO, Royer TA, Biles S, Maxson E. 2016.Sugarcane aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae): a new pest on sorghum in North America. Journal of Integrated Pest Management 7: 1–13. Google Scholar

6.

Brey TP, Ohayon H, Lesourd M, Castex H, Roucachet J, Latge JP. 1985. Ultrastructure and chemical composition of the outer layers of the cuticle of the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 82: 401–411. Google Scholar

7.

Chuck-Hernández C, Pérez-Carrillo E, Heredia-Olea E, Serna-Saldívar S. 2011. El sorgo un cultivo multifacético para la producción de bioetanol en México: tecnologías, avances y áreas de oportunidad. Revista Mexicana de Ingeniería Química 10: 529–549. Google Scholar

8.

FIRA – Fideicomisos Instituidos en Relacion con la Agricultura. 2016. Panorama agroalimentario del sorgo. Dirección de Investigación y Evaluación Económi-ca y Sectorial. Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico. Google Scholar

9.

Harris-Shultz K, Ni X, Wadl PA, Wang X, Wang H, Huang F, Flanders K, Seiter N, Kerns D, Meagher R, Xue Q, Reising D, Buntin D, Cuevas HE, Brewer MJ, Yang X. 2017. Microsatellite markers reveal a predominant sugarcane aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) clone is found on sorghum in seven states and one territory of the USA. Crop Science 57: 2064–2072. Google Scholar

10.

Hewage CM, Bandara KANP, Karunaratne V, Bandara BMR, Wijesundara DSA. 1997. Insecticidal activity of some medicinal plants of Sri Lanka. Journal of the National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka 25: 141–150. Google Scholar

11.

Isman MB. 2008. Botanical insecticides: for richer, for poorer. Pest Management Science 64: 8–11. Google Scholar

12.

Medina RF, Armstrong SJ, Harrison K. 2017. Genetic population structure of sugarcane aphid, Melanaphis sacchari, in sorghum, sugarcane, and Johnson grass in the continental USA. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 162: 358–365. Google Scholar

13.

Medrzycki P, Montanari R, Bortolotti L, Sabatini AG, Maini E, Porrini C. 2003. Effects of imidacloprid administered in sub-lethal doses on honey bee behaviour. Laboratory tests. Bulletin of Insectology 56: 59–62. Google Scholar

14.

Müller N, Faria X, Facchini LA, Gastal A, Tomasi E. 2005. Pesticides and respiratory symptoms among farmers. Revista de Saúde Pública 39: 973–981. Google Scholar

15.

Nia B, Frah N, Azoui I. 2015. Insecticidal activity of three plants extracts against Myzus persicae (Sulzer, 1776) and their phytochemical screening. Acta Agriculturae Slovenica 2: 261–267. Google Scholar

16.

Nibouche S, Costet L, Holt JR, Jacobson A, Pekarcik A, Sadeyen J, Armstrong JS, Peterson GC, McLaren N, Medina RF. 2018. Invasion of sorghum in the Americas by a new sugarcane aphid (Melanaphis sacchari) superclone. PLoS ONE 13: 1–15. Google Scholar

17.

Ramos-López MA, González-Chávez MM, Cárdenas-Ortega NC, Zavala-Sánchez MA, Pérez S. 2012. Activity of the main fatty acid components of the hexane leaf extract of Ricinus communis against Spodoptera frugiperda. African Journal of Biotechnology 11: 4274–4278. Google Scholar

18.

Rana M, Dhamija H, Prashar B, Sharma S. 2012. Ricinus communis L.-A. Review. PharmaTech 4: 1706–1711. Google Scholar

19.

Ribeiro PR, de Castro RD, Fernández LG. 2016. Constituents of the oilseed crop Ricinus communis and their pharmacological activities: a review. Industrial Crops and Products 91: 358–376. Google Scholar

20.

Rodríguez S, Regonat M, Carrizo P, Meilán J, Wagner M, Gurni A. 2012. Activity of nonpolar extracts from Picrasma crenata (Simaroubaceae) against Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididadae). Revista Latinoamericana de Química 39: 113–120. Google Scholar

21.

SAS. 2002. SAS System for Windows, vers. 9.0. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA. Google Scholar

22.

Schenck S, Lehrer AT. 2000. Factors affecting the transmission and spread of sugarcane yellow leaf virus. Plant Disease 84: 1085–1088. Google Scholar

23.

Singh BU, Padmaja PG, Seetharama N. 2004. Biology and management of the sugarcane aphid, Melanaphis sacchari (Zehntner) (Homoptera: Aphididae), in sorghum: a review. Crop Protection 23: 739–755. Google Scholar

24.

Singh RP, Devakumar C, Dhingra S. 1988. Activity of neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss) seed kernel extracts against the mustard aphid, Lipaphis erysimi. Phytoparasitica 16: 225–230. Google Scholar

25.

Tejeda-Reyes MA, Díaz-Nájera JF, Rodríguez-Maciel JC, Vargas-Hernández M, Solís-Aguilar JF, Ayvar-Serna S, Flores-Yañez JA. 2017. Evaluación en campo de insecticidas sobre Melanaphis sacchari (Zehntner) en sorgo. Southwestern Entomologist 42: 545–550. Google Scholar

26.

Worbs S, Köhler K, Pauly D, Avondet MA, Schaer M, Dorner MB, Dorner B. 2011. Ricinus communis intoxications in human and veterinary medicine - a summary of real cases. Toxins 3: 1332–1372. Google Scholar
César Sotelo-Leyva, David Osvaldo Salinas-Sánchez, Guadalupe Peña-Chora, Adriana Gabriela Trejo-Loyo, Manasés González-Cortázar, and Alejandro Zamilpa "Insecticidal Compounds in Ricinus communis L. (Euphorbiaceae) to Control Melanaphis sacchari Zehntner (Hemiptera: Aphididae)," Florida Entomologist 103(1), 91-95, (8 April 2020). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.103.0415
Published: 8 April 2020
JOURNAL ARTICLE
5 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top