Translator Disclaimer
8 April 2020 Seasonal Parasitism of the Leaf-Cutting Ant Atta sexdens Linnaeus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) by Phorid Flies (Diptera: Phoridae) in a Brazilian Cerrado-Atlantic Forest Ecotone
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Phorid flies (Diptera: Phoridae) parasitize insects of many orders including leaf-cutting ants, which are pests of several crops. These parasitoids may have a significant impact on ant behavior by altering their foraging rhythm. Seasonal variations in climatic variables, such as temperature and humidity, influence the abundance, activity period, distribution, and reproduction of insects. Therefore, knowledge of parasitoid seasonal patterns is important for biological control success. In this study we evaluate the parasitism of the leaf-cutting ant Atta sexdens L. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) by Apocephalus attophilus Borgmeier and Eibesfeldtphora tonhascai Brown (both Diptera: Phoridae) across seasons throughout a yr in a Brazilian Cerrado-Atlantic Forest ecotone, and compare their parasitism in a semi-deciduous seasonal forest fragment and urban area. The number of ants parasitized by A. attophilus and E. tonhascai was higher in the winter and spring, respectively, but similar in summer and fall. Apocephalus attophilus parasitism was negatively correlated with temperature but not with relative humidity, whereas ant parasitism by E. tonhascai presented no correlation with either parameter. The number of ants parasitized by A. attophilus and E. tonhascai in the semi-deciduous seasonal forest fragment was higher than in urban areas. Knowledge of biotic and abiotic factors influencing the population dynamics of phorid flies is important for rearing and releasing protocols for these parasitoids.

Phorid flies are small-sized, highly diverse insects, found in Neotropical regions with varying larval lifestyles (Disney 1994). Many species of this family parasitize bees (Core et al. 2012), termites (Neoh & Lee 2010), and leaf-cutting ant pests of several crops (Della Lucia et al. 2014; Farder-Gomes et al. 2016). Leaf-cutting ants are managed principally with insecticidal baits (Zanetti et al. 2003; Montoya-Lerma et al. 2012). Increasing global awareness regarding sustainable cultivation and pest control methods that are safer for the environment (Bale et al. 2008; Zheng et al. 2017) has driven the search for alternative methods to manage leaf-cutting ants.

Leaf-cutting ant parasitoids in the family Phoridae are specialists or generalists, coexisting in the environment and attacking ants of different head sizes (Bragança & Medeiros 2006). Additionally, these parasitoids can reduce plant material transported into the nests and ant traffic on trails (Martinez et al. 2014; Guillade & Folgarait 2015). Females of these insects lay an egg into the body of each ant with the larva subsequently feeding on host tissues (Bragança & Medeiros 2006; Farder-Gomes et al. 2016). Phorid flies have an evolutionary relationship with host ants, and require them as the only food source for their entire development. Therefore, fly richness correlates with ant richness (Elizalde & Folgarait 2010).

Landscape structure is important for parasitoid-host interaction (Thies et al. 2005; Liu et al. 2016b), and fragmentation and loss of environmental complexity may decrease natural enemy abundance (Elizalde & Queiroz 2013; Zhao et al. 2015). Highly diversified landscapes may provide multiple resources, such as nest sites, temporary refuges, and food (Alignier et al. 2014; Liu et al. 2016b), whereas agricultural landscapes, e.g., pasture and field crops, have fewer resources due to reduced habitat complexity (Kleijn et al. 2009; Thies et al. 2w011).

Changes in landscape structure also modifies microclimate, thereby affecting insect populations (Alignier et al. 2014; Aranda & Graciolli 2015). Climatic variables, such as temperature and humidity, influence the abundance, activity period, diversity, distribution, and reproduction of insects (Folgarait et al. 2005, 2007; Aranda & Graciolli 2015). Preferred climatic conditions differ between parasitoid species (Bragança & Medeiros 2006; Reese & Philpott 2012). For example, Pseudacteon laciniosus Brown (Diptera: Phoridae) was found to be more abundant in the wet season than in the dry, whereas Pseudacteon planidorsalis Brown (Diptera: Phoridae) showed the opposite pattern (Reese & Philpott 2012). Therefore, knowledge of parasitoid seasonal patterns is important for success of biological control. The objective of our study was to evaluate the parasitism of the leaf-cutting ant Atta sexdens Linnaeus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) by the phorids Apocephalus attophilus Borgmeier and Eibesfeldtphora tonhascai Brown (both Diptera: Phoridae) across seasons throughout a yr in a Brazilian Cerrado-Atlantic Forest ecotone, and compare their ant parasitism in a semi-deciduous seasonal forest fragment and urban area.

Materials and Methods

STUDY SITE

This study was conducted at the Universidade Federal de Viçosa campus Florestal (19.871194°S, 44.423916°W) in Florestal, Minas Gerais State, Brazil. This region corresponds to the Cerrado-Atlantic Forest ecotone (IBGE 2018). Mean temperature and relative humidity of each mo were obtained through the weather station on campus. The seasons are as follows: spring (Sep–Nov), summer (Dec–Feb), fall (Mar–May), and winter (Jun–Aug).

COLLECTION AND ANT REARING

Four A. sexdens nests were selected: 2 nests in a semi-deciduous seasonal forest fragment: (Nest 1: 19.876777°S, 44.413638°W) and (Nest 2: 19.884750°S, 44.416388°W); and 2 in urban areas around the campus: (Nest 3: 19.883750°S, 44.424055°W) and (Nest 4: 19.884833°S, 44.426611°W). The semi-deciduous seasonal forest fragment has an area of 7.1 ha, with the canopy not exceeding 20 m in height and with signs of anthropic disturbances. The ant nests within the forest fragment and urban area were isolated from each other by 200 and 300 m, respectively.

Approximately 200 workers were collected from each nest per mo between Nov 2012 and Nov 2013. Ants were collected between 7:00 PM and 10:00 PM along foraging trails. If ants were not foraging, a stick of wood was introduced into the nest entrance, and as soon as the ants left the nest, they were collected using forceps.

In the laboratory, ants of the same cohort nest were kept in a common plastic tray, fed daily with 10% honey water solution, and kept in an acclimatized chamber (25 ± 1 °C, 80 ± 5% RH, and 12:12 h [L:D] photoperiod). Dead ants were removed each d from trays and individualized in glass tubes sealed with cotton wool. These glass tubes were maintained in an acclimatized chamber and after 3 d, dead ants were observed under stereomicroscope (Zeiss Stemi DV4, Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany), to evaluate if they were parasitized by phorids. Parasitized ants were kept in the chamber until adult phorid emergence, and ants that were still alive 15 d after collection were discarded (Farder-Gomes et al. 2016). Flies were stored in plastic microtubes with 70% alcohol for further identification. Voucher specimens were deposited at the Laboratory of Entomology and Myrmecology, Universidade Federal de Viçosa campus Florestal, Florestal, Minas Gerais State, Brazil.

STATISTICAL ANALYSES

A chi-square test of independence was performed to determine if there was a significant relationship between the level of phorid parasitism and seasons, as well as the abundance of leaf-cutting ants parasitized by A. attophilus and E. tonhascai during seasons. Pearson's Correlation Coefficient was used to assess the relationship between the number of ants parasitized by either species to temperature and relative humidity. Moreover, the number of ants parasitized by A. attophilus and E. tonhascai in semi-deciduous seasonal forest and urban landscape was compared using chi-square test. All analyses were performed using R Statistical Software (R Core Team 2018), and differences were considered significant when P < 0.05.

Results

Parasitism of ants by phorid species was significantly influenced by season (χ2 = 74.6; df = 3; P < 0.05). The number of ants parasitized by A. attophilus was higher in the winter (χ2 = 33.3; df = 1; P < 0.05), and those by E. tonhascai in the spring (χ2 = 27.6; df = 1; P < 0.05) (Fig. 1). However, the number of ants parasitized by both parasitoids in summer (χ2 = 0.7; df = 1; P > 0.05) and fall (χ2 = 7.22; df = 1; P > 0.05) was similar (Fig. 1).

The number of ants parasitized by A. attophilus was negatively correlated with temperature (r = –0.722; df = 9; P < 0.05), but not with relative humidity (r = 0.150; df = 9; P > 0.05) (Fig. 2). The number of ants parasitized by E. tonhascai did not correlate with temperature (r = 0.040; df = 9; P > 0.05) or relative humidity (r = 0.243; df = 9; P > 0.05). In addition, parasitism by A. attophilus and E. tonhascai was significantly greater in the semi-deciduous (364 ants parasitized) (χ2 = 234.4; df = 1; P < 0.05) than the urban landscape (32 ants parasitized).

Fig. 1.

Number of leaf-cutting ants Atta sexdens parasitized by Apocephalus attophilus and Eibesfeldtphora tonhascai in a Brazilian Cerrado-Atlantic Forest ecotone. The seasons are as follows: spring (Sep–Nov), summer (Dec–Feb), fall (Mar–May), and winter (Jun–Aug).

img-z3-2_112.jpg

Discussion

We found that an increase in number of leaf-cutting ants parasitized by A. attophilus occurred with decreasing temperature, whereas the highest parasitism by this species appeared during winter, which indicated this species has a greater tolerance to low temperatures, similar to that reported for the phorids Pseudacteon borgmeieri Schmitz (Diptera: Phoridae) (Folgarait et al. 2003) and Lucianaphora folgaraitae Disney (Diptera: Phoridae) (Elizalde et al. 2018). A negative correlation between parasitism by A. attophilus and temperature also was reported from Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil (Martins 2015). Phorid flies commonly disappear during colder mo (Folgarait et al. 2003). Thus, a preference for lower temperatures may benefit A. attophilus by allowing it to explore hosts during periods where few parasitoids of other species may be present. In addition, results of our work showed that parasitism rates of A. attophilus on A. sexdens were not correlated with the relative humidity; conversely, other studies have reported an increase in parasitism by this species in the hottest and rainy seasons (Arruda et al. 2018; Farder-Gomes et al. 2018). This suggests that A. attophilus possesses a wide range of tolerance for some environmental conditions. On the other hand, greater leaf-cutter ant parasitism during the spring by E. tonhascai suggested better adaptation of this species to the climatic conditions of that season. Differences in the number of ants parasitized between seasons may allow for temporal segregation of parasitoid species throughout the yr with reduced interspecific competition (Guillade & Folgarait 2011; Arruda et al. 2018; Elizalde et al. 2018).

Fig. 2.

Correlation between temperature and the number of leaf-cutting ants Atta sexdens parasitized by Apocephalus attophilus (r = –0.722; df = 9; P < 0.05).

img-z3-6_112.jpg

As in our study, lack of correlation between E. tonhascai parasitism with either temperature or humidity may indicate that this parasitoid is more resistant to changes in climatic conditions. Apocephalus attophilus can parasitize leaf-cutting ants during the d and night, but E. tonhascai is active only during the d (Bragança et al. 2008). We hypothesize that light intensity may be an important determinant of abundance and parasitism, similar to that reported for Pseudacteon litoralis Borgmeier (Diptera: Phoridae) attacking Solenopsis saevissima (Smith) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil (Pesquero et al. 1996), but this hypothesis would need further investigation. The highest number of ants parasitized in the semi-deciduous forest fragment may be due to the landscape diversity of this area with alternative sites for feeding and refuge, enhancing parasitoid populations (Pozzebon et al. 2015; Liu et al. 2016b; Damien et al. 2017). This agrees with the higher number of ants parasitized by E. tonhascai, Eibesfeldtphora bragancai Brown (Diptera: Phoridae), and A. attophilus in a Cerrado fragment containing Eucalyptus sp. (Myrtaceae), showing that these parasitoids are sensitive to changes in landscape composition (Pesquero et al. 2010). Similarly, high landscape diversity increased the Trichogramma chilonis Ishii (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) parasitism rates on Helicoverpa armigera Hübner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) eggs (Liu et al. 2016a). The failure of the parasitoid Pseudacteon curvatus Borgmeier (Diptera: Phoridae) to establish itself in the states of Florida and Tennessee, USA, was attributed to insufficient vegetation cover and harsh environmental conditions (Graham et al. 2003). Therefore, the maintenance of native vegetation fragments is important to enhance natural enemy populations.

In summary, our study provides important ecological information about the interaction between the leaf-cutting ant A. sexdens and its parasitoids. Generally, the parasitism by phorid flies varied with season; A. attophilus parasitized more ants in winter and E. tonhascai in spring. Parasitism by A. attophilus was negatively correlated with temperature, and corroborates the preference of this species for lower temperatures. In addition, reduction of landscape complexity in urban areas may decrease the parasitism by parasitoid species. Therefore, biotic and abiotic factors that influence the population dynamics of phorids in the field must be understood to design mass rearing and releasing protocols for these parasitoids.

Acknowledgments

This study was financed by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) – (Finance Code 001), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG and Programa Cooperativo sobre Proteção Florestal (PROTEF) do Instituto de Pesquisas e Estudos Florestais (IPEF)). Phillip John Villani (University of Melbourne, Australia) corrected an edited English version of the manuscript.

References Cited

1.

Alignier A, Raymond L, Deconchat M, Menozzi P, Monteil C, Sarthou JP, Vialatte A, Ouin A. 2014. The effect of semi-natural habitats on aphids and their natural enemies across spatial and temporal scales. Biological Control 77: 76–82. Google Scholar

2.

Aranda R, Graciolli G. 2015. Spatial-temporal distribution of the Hymenoptera in the Brazilian Savanna and the effects of habitat heterogeneity on these patterns. Journal of Insect Conservation 19: 1173–1187. Google Scholar

3.

Arruda FV, Teresa FB, Martins HC, Pesquero MA, Bragança MAL. 2018. Seasonal and site differences in phorid parasitoidism rates of leaf-cutting ants. Environmental Entomology 1–7. Google Scholar

4.

Bale JS, Van Lenteren JC, Bigler F. 2008. Biological control and sustainable food production. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Science 363: 761–776. Google Scholar

5.

Bragança MAL, Medeiros ZCS. 2006. Ocorrência e características biológicas de forídeos parasitóides (Diptera: Phoridae) da saúva Atta laevigata (Smith) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) em Porto Nacional, TO. Neotropical Entomology 35: 408–411. Google Scholar

6.

Bragança MAL, Souza LM, Nogueira CA, Della Lucia TMC. 2008. Parasitismo por Neodohrniphora spp. Malloch (Diptera, Phoridae) em operárias de Atta sexdens rubropilosa Forel (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 52: 300–302. Google Scholar

7.

Core A, Runckel C, Ivers J, Quock C, Siapno T, DeNault S, Brown B, DeRisi J, Smith CD, Hafernik J. 2012. A new threat to honey bees, the parasitic phorid fly Apocephalus borealis. PLoS ONE 7: 1–9. Google Scholar

8.

Damien M, Le Lann C, Desneux N, Alford L, Al Hassan D, Georges R, Baaren JV. 2017. Flowering cover crops in winter increase pest control but not trophic link diversity. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 247: 418–425. Google Scholar

9.

Della Lucia TMC, Gandra LC, Guedes RN. 2014. Managing leaf-cutting ants: peculiarities, trends and challenges. Pest Management Science 70: 14–23. Google Scholar

10.

Disney RHL. 1994. Scuttle Flies: The Phoridae, vol. 1. Chapman & Hall, London, United Kingdom. Google Scholar

11.

Elizalde L, Folgarait PJ. 2010. Host diversity and environmental variables as determinants of the species richness of the parasitoids of leaf-cutting ants. Journal of Biogeography 37: 2305–2316. Google Scholar

12.

Elizalde L, Queiroz JM. 2013. Parasitoids of Acromyrmex (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) leaf-cutting ants in continuous and fragmented Atlantic Forest. Sociobiology 60: 397–404. Google Scholar

13.

Elizalde L, Guillade A, Folgarait PJ. 2018. No evidence of strong host resource segregation by phorid parasitoids of leaf-cutting ants. Acta Oecologica 93: 21–29. Google Scholar

14.

Farder-Gomes CF, Oliveira MA, Gonçalves PL, Gontijo LM, Zanuncio JC, Bragança MAL, Pires EM. 2016. Reproductive ecology of phorid parasitoids in relation to the head size of leaf-cutting ants Atta sexdens Forel. Bulletin of Entomological Research 107: 487–492. Google Scholar

15.

Farder-Gomes CF, da Silva VP, Pereira TPL, Serrão JE, Pires EM, Oliveira MA. 2018. Parasitism, sexual dimorphism and effect of host size on Apocephalus attophilus offspring, a parasitoid of the leaf-cutting ant Atta bisphaerica. PLoS One 13: e0208253.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208253 (last accessed 27 May 2019). Google Scholar

16.

Folgarait PJ, Bruzzone OA, Gilbert LE. 2003. Seasonal patterns of activity among species of black fire ant parasitoid flies (Pseudacteon: Phoridae) in Argentina explained by analysis of climatic variables. Biological Control 28: 368–378. Google Scholar

17.

Folgarait PJ, Patrock RJ, Gilbert LE. 2007. The influence of ambient conditions and space on the phenological patterns of a Solenopsis phorid guild in an arid environment. Biological Control 42: 262–273. Google Scholar

18.

Folgarait PJ, Bruzzone OA, Porter SD, Pesquero MA, Gilbert LE. 2005. Biogeography and macroecology of phorid flies that attack fire ants in south-eastern Brazil and Argentina. Journal of Biogeography 32: 353–367. Google Scholar

19.

Graham LC, Porter SD, Pereira RM, Dorough HD, Kelley AT. 2003. Field releases of the decapitating fly Pseudacteon curvatus (Diptera: Phoridae) for control of imported fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Alabama, Florida and Tennessee. Florida Entomologist 86: 334–339. Google Scholar

20.

Guillade AC, Folgarait PJ. 2011. Life history traits and parasitism rates of four phorid species (Diptera: Phoridae), parasitoids of Atta vollenweideri (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Argentina. Journal Economic Entomology 104: 32–40. Google Scholar

21.

Guillade AC, Folgarait PJ. 2015. Effect of phorid fly density on the foraging of Atta vollenweideri leafcutter ants in the field. Entomologia Experimentalis Applicata 154: 53–61. Google Scholar

22.

IBGE – Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. 2018. Infográficos: dados gerais do município.  https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/brasil/mg/florestal/panorama (last accessed 27 May 2019). Google Scholar

23.

Kleijn D, Kohler F, Báldi A, Batáry P, Concepción ED, Clough Y, Díaz M, Gabriel D, Holzschuh A, Knop E, Kovács A, Marshal EJP, Tscharntke T, Verhulst J. 2009. On the relationship between farmland biodiversity and land-use intensity in Europe. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Science 276: 903–909. Google Scholar

24.

Liu B, Yang L, Yang Y, Lu Y. 2016a. Influence of landscape diversity and composition on the parasitism of cotton bollworm eggs in maize. PLoS ONE 11: 1–12. Google Scholar

25.

Liu B, Yang L, Yang F, Wang Q, Yang Y, Lu Y, Gardiner MM. 2016b. Landscape diversity enhances parasitism of cotton bollworm (Helicoverpa armigera) eggs by Trichogramma chilonis in cotton. Biological Control 93: 15–23. Google Scholar

26.

Martins HC. 2015. Bioecologia de três espécies de forídeos parasitoides da saúva Atta bisphaerica. M.S. thesis. Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Google Scholar

27.

Martínez CL, Virgala MBR, Santadino MV, Haro AM, Barañao JJ. 2015. Estudios sobre el comportamiento de forrajeo de Acromyrmex lundi Guering (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) y su efecto sobre el crecimiento de procedencias de Eucalyptus globulus Labill. (Myrtaceae). Revista Árvore 39: 189–198. Google Scholar

28.

Montoya-Lerma J, Girald-Echeverri C, Armbrecht I, Farji-Brener A, Calle Z. 2012. Leaf-cutting ants revised: towards rational management and control. International Journal of Pest Management 58: 225–247. Google Scholar

29.

Neoh KB, Lee CY. 2010. Behavioral and morphological changes in soldiers of Macrotermes gilvus (Termitidae: Macrotermitinae) parasitized by Misotermes mindeni (Diptera: Phoridae). Environmental Entomology 39: 835–840. Google Scholar

30.

Pesquero MA, Campiolo S, Fowler HG, Porter SD. 1996. Diurnal patterns of ovipositional activity in two Pseudacteon fly parasitoids (Diptera: Phoridae) of Solenopsis fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Florida Entomologist 79: 455–457. Google Scholar

31.

Pesquero MA, Bessa LA, Silva LCM, Silva LC, Arruda FV. 2010. Influência ambiental na taxa de parasitismo (Diptera: Phoridae) de Atta laevigata e Atta sexdens (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Revista de Biologia Tropical 7: 45–48. Google Scholar

32.

Pozzebon A, Loeb GM, Duso C. 2015. Role of supplemental foods and habitat structural complexity in persistence and coexistence of generalist predatory mites. Scientific Reports 6: 14997. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14997 Google Scholar

33.

R Core Team. 2018. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Google Scholar

34.

Reese KM, Philpott SM. 2012. Environmental and habitat drivers of relative abundance for a suite of Azteca-attacking Pseudacteon phorid flies. Environmental Entomology 41: 1107–1114. Google Scholar

35.

Thies C, Roschewitz I, Tscharntke T. 2005. The landscape context of cereal aphid parasitoid interactions. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Science 272: 203–210. Google Scholar

36.

Thies C, Haenke S, Scherber C, Bengtsson J, Bommarco R, Clemen LW, Ceryngier P, Dennis C, Emmerson M, Gagic V, Hawro V, Liira J, Weisser WW, Winqvist C, Tscharntke T. 2011.The relationship between agricultural intensification and biological control: experimental tests across Europe. Ecology Applications 21: 2187–2196. Google Scholar

37.

Zanetti R, Zanuncio JC, Vilela EF, Leite HG, Jaffé K, Oliveira AC. 2003. Level of economic damage for leaf-cutting ants in Eucalyptus plantations in Brazil. Sociobiology 42: 433–442. Google Scholar

38.

Zhao ZH, Hui C, He DH, Li BL. 2015. Effects of agricultural intensification on ability of natural enemies to control aphids. Scientific Reports 5: 8024. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep08024 Google Scholar

39.

Zheng X, Lu Y, Zhu P, Zhang F, Tian J, Xu H, Chen G, Nansem C, Lu Z. 2017. Use of banker plant system for sustainable management of the most important insect pest in rice fields in China. Scientific Reports 7: 45581. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep45581 Google Scholar
Cliver Fernandes Farder-Gomes, Marco Antônio de Oliveira, Ana Carolina Ribeiro de Oliveira, Pollyana Leão Gonçalves, Evaldo Martins Pires, Antonio José Vinha Zanuncio, José Eduardo Serrão, and José Cola Zanuncio "Seasonal Parasitism of the Leaf-Cutting Ant Atta sexdens Linnaeus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) by Phorid Flies (Diptera: Phoridae) in a Brazilian Cerrado-Atlantic Forest Ecotone," Florida Entomologist 103(1), 112-115, (8 April 2020). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.103.0418
Published: 8 April 2020
JOURNAL ARTICLE
4 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top