The establishment or colonization of natural enemies is a critical period of adjustment for the introduced individuals in the target area. Successful colonization and its effectiveness in control, depend on the intrinsic capabilities of the species and the interaction of physical and biotic factors (Callan 1969). Although the concept of establishment is simple, in practice it is a difficult task. From 4,769 introductions of predators and parasitoids made up to 1990, only 1,445 (30.3%) were established (Greathead & Greathead 1992). Diverse reasons have been mentioned of the traits likely to reduce the establishment of biological control agents. Among the most important are: adverse climatic condition, insufficient genetic variation, poor searching capacity, interference from chemicals or cultural practices, inadequate numbers of individuals introduced, lack of synchrony with the host and interference by native organisms (Hopper et al. 1993, Hopper 1996).
Prorops nasuta Waterston is an African parasitoid of the coffee berry borer (CBB) Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), which is considered as the main pest of coffee worldwide (Le Pelley 1968, Baker 1999). P. nasuta females usually spend most of its life inside of a coffee fruit infested by the CBB. The wasp feeds on all juvenile stages, but only paralyses and oviposits on the full-grown larvae and pupae. The larva starts to feed externally after hatching and one host is sufficient for the development of each wasp. When the parasite larva is fully developed, it spins a cocoon and enters to the pupal stage (Hargreaves 1935; Infante 1998). The life cycle of P. nasuta form egg to adult lasts 28 days at 22°C (Infante 2000), but adults remain in the coffee fruit for a few days more in order to copulate. As with other bethylids, this species has males emerging before their sisters with which they mate. The new generation of wasps leave the berry during the day, searching for infested coffee fruits (Hargreaves 1935, Murphy & Moore 1990).
In the last few years this parasitoid has been introduced to Mexico, Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, Ecuador, Colombia, Jamaica, Indonesia and India. In all these countries P. nasuta has been released and is presently under evaluation as a biological control agent (Klein-Koch et al. 1988, Barrera et al. 1990, Baker 1999). In the case of Mexico, repeatedly releases of parasitoids have been carried out in Chiapas since 1992. Recovery surveys indicated that up to now, there is no evidence of the establishment of P. nasuta in the country (Infante et al. 2001). Identifying the factors that interfere in the establishment of P. nasuta is essential to the success of biological control programmes for the CBB. For that reason, the present paper reports on some native arthropods that were found predating on this species in coffee plantations of Chiapas.
The wasps used in releases were reared in the laboratory on borer infested coffee fruits. Parasitoids were taken to the field as adults and released from one liter plastic jars directly onto the branches of coffee trees. From 1992 to 1996, ca. 156,000 individuals were released in the field usually in the morning (before 12:00 hr). Colonization sites for releases consisted of 22 locations, each approximately one-fourth of a hectare. Because few people observe insects under field conditions (P. S. Baker, personal communication), we stayed in the field for about 1-2 hours following parasitoid liberations, to observe the wasps and any possible interaction with other organisms. The organisms detected as interacting with P. nasuta were collected and taken to the laboratory for identification.
A list of arthropods preying on adults of P. nasuta is presented in Table 1. Meantime females were searching for infested fruits, they were easy prey for ants, which normally were present on coffee trees. It was possible to detect at least five species of ants preying on adults of P. nasuta. Also six species of spiders caught parasitoids on their webs. As spiders were collected in alcohol, it was not possible to verify their predation on P. nasuta. However, we would assume they do, considering they are generalist predators. Recent studies have reported that spiders, such as, Cyclosa caroli, Leucauge mariana and L. vetusta capture and consume individuals of the CBB and its bethylid parasitoid Cephalonomia stephanoderis (Henaut et al. 2001).
Because of the small size of P. nasuta (2 mm), observations were especially difficult to carry out. We could not measure the intensity in which predators were acting, but presumably they are only important during releases, or maybe when the new progeny of wasps leave the coffee fruits in searching for new hosts. Arthropods preying on P. nasuta were associated with old coffee trees and abundant shade. It is possible there are other species of ants and spiders predating on P. nasuta, as there is a great diversity and abundance of these organisms associated with coffee trees in Chiapas (Ibarra-Nuñez 1990, Ibarra-Nuñez & García-Ballinas 1998). Callan (1969) emphasized the jeopardy due to ants when colonizing natural enemies for classical biological control. Notwithstanding, Le Pelley (1968) stated that this sort of predation is incidental and only has a transitory effect, since there is no continuing association between predator and prey. According to the poor results in the establishment of P. nasuta in Mexico (Infante et al. 2001), is possible that predation is only a part of several factors that impede the establishment of P. nasuta. On the other hand, releasing parasitoids in the adult stage may not be favorable for this species. Because of that, it would be worth trying to release other biological stage. For instance, parasitoids could be taken from the laboratory to the field, in the pupal stage while they are still inside the coffee fruits. Coffee fruits could be placed inside a small cage hanging on a branch of coffee with a thread covered with grease to avoid ants and non-flying organisms. In this way, the wasps would emerge when favorable conditions exist. This sort of release might overcome some problems with predators and it would have the additional advantage of giving refuge and shelter to the wasps.
We are grateful to G. Hernandez and J. L. Barrera for technical assistance. Milimo Mebelo made helpful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.
Prorops nasuta is an African parasitoid that has been imported into Mexico for the biological control of the coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei. After being released for several years, the establishment of this parasitoid was never achieved. In the present paper we report some native arthropods that were found interfering with P. nasuta in coffee plantations of Chiapas during the release of parasitoids. Presumably predation by ants and spiders on adults of P. nasuta is only a component of several factors that impede the establishment of P. nasuta in this country. Releasing P. nasuta in the pupal stage instead of adults is discussed in order to enhance the potential of this species as a biocontrol agent.
- P. S. Baker 1999. La broca del café en Colombia. Informe Final del proyecto MIP para el café DFID-CENICAFE -CABI. Chinchiná, Colombia. 154 pp. Google Scholar
- J. F. Barrera, P. Baker, and J. Valenzuela . 1990. Introducción de dos especies de parasitoides africanos a México para el control biológico de la broca del cafeto Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Folia Entomol. Mex. 79:245–247. Google Scholar
- E. McC. Callan 1969. Ecology and insect colonization for biological control. Proc. Ecol. Soc. Australia 4:17–31. Google Scholar
- D. J. Greathead and A. H. Greathead . 1992. Biological control of insect pests by insect parasitoids and predators: the BIOCAT database. Biocontrol News Inform. 13:61N–68N. Google Scholar
- H. Hargreaves 1935. Stephanoderes hampei, Ferr., coffee berry borer in Uganda. East African Agr. J. 1:218–224. Google Scholar
- Y. Henaut, J. Pablo, G. Ibarra-Nuñez, and T. Williams . 2001. Retention, capture and consumption of experimental prey by orb-web weaving spiders in coffee plantations of Southern Mexico. Ent. Exp. Appl. 98:1–8. Google Scholar
- K. R. Hopper 1996. Making biological control introductions more effective. In Biological control introductions: opportunities for improved crop protection, J. K. Waage (ed.). BCPC, London. 144 pp. Google Scholar
- K. R. Hopper and R. T. Roush . 1993. Mate finding, dispersal, number released, and the success of biological control introductions. Ecol. Entomol. 18:321–331. Google Scholar
- G. Ibarra-Nuñez 1990. Los artrópodos asociados a cafetos en un cafetal mixto del Soconusco, Chiapas, Mexico. I. Variedad y abundancia. Folia Entomol. Mex. 79:207–231. Google Scholar
- G. Ibarra-Nuñez and A. Garcia-Ballinas . 1998. Diversidad de tres familias de arañas tejedoras (Araneae: Araneidae, Tetragnathidae, Theridiidae) en cafetales del Soconusco, Chiapas, Mexico. Folia Entomol. Mex. 102:11–20. Google Scholar
- F. Infante 1998. Biological control of Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in Mexico, using the parasitoid Prorops nasuta (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae). PhD Dissertation. Imperial College, University of London, U.K. 173 pp. Google Scholar
- F. Infante 2000. Development and population growth rates of Prorops nasuta (Hym., Bethylidae) at constant temperatures. J. Appl. Entomol. 124:343–348. Google Scholar
- F. Infante, J. Mumford, and I. Mendez . 2001. Non-recovery of Prorops nasuta (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae) an imported parasitoid of the coffee berry borer (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in Mexico. Southwest. Entomol. 26:159–163. Google Scholar
- C. Klein-Koch, O. Espinoza, A. Tandazo, P. Cisneros, and D. Delgado . 1988. Factores naturales de regulación y control biológico de la broca del café (Hypothenemus hampei Ferr.). Sanidad Vegetal 3:5–30. Google Scholar
- R. H. Le Pelley 1968. Pests of coffee. Longmans Green and Co. London. 590 pp. Google Scholar
- S. T. Murphy and D. Moore . 1990. Biological control of the coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae): previous programmes and possibilities for the future. Biocontrol News and Information 11:107–117. Google Scholar