Translator Disclaimer
1 June 2004 Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of Bermuda
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

For more than 50 years, two exotic ant species, Linepithema humile (Mayr) and Pheidole megacephala (F.), have been battling for ecological supremacy in Bermuda. Here we summarize known ant records from Bermuda, provide an update on the conflict between the dominant ant species, and evaluate the possible impact of the dominant species on the other ants in Bermuda. We examined ant specimens from Bermuda representing 20 species: Brachymyrmex heeri Forel, B. obscurior Forel, Camponotus pennsylvanicus (De Geer), Cardiocondyla emeryi Forel, C. obscuriorWheeler, Crematogaster sp., Hypoponera opaciceps (Mayr),H. punctatissima (Roger), L. humile, Monomorium monomorium Bolton, Odontomachus ruginodisSmith, Paratrechina longicornis (Latreille), P. vividula (Nylander), P. megacephala, Plagiolepis alluaudi Forel, Solenopsis (Diplorhoptrum) sp., Tetramorium caldarium Roger, T. simillimum (Smith), Wasmannia auropunctata (Roger), and an undetermined Dacetini. Records for all but three (H. punctatissima, P. vividula, W. auropunctata) include specimens from 1987 or later. We found no specimens to confirm records of several other ant species, including Monomorium pharaonis(L.) and Tetramorium caespitum(L.). Currently, L. humile dominates most of Bermuda, while P. megacephala appear to be at its lowest population levels recorded. Though inconspicuous, B. obscurior is common and coexists with both dominant species. Paratrechina longicornis has conspicuous populations in two urban areas. Three other ant species are well established, but inconspicuous due to small size (B. heeri, Solenopsis sp.) or subterranean habits (H. opaciceps). All other ant species appear to be rare, including at least one, O. ruginodis, which was apparently more common in the past.

A battle for territorial supremacy has been raging on the Atlantic islands of Bermuda for more than 50 years. The combatants are two species of exotic ants, one Old World (the big-headed ant, Pheidole megacephala (F.)) and one New World (the Argentine ant, Linepithema humile(Mayr)). As documented in studies conducted 1927-1986 (Haskins 1939; Haskins & Haskins 1965; Haskins & Haskins 1988; Crowell 1968; Lieberburg et al. 1975), P. megacephala was the dominant ant in Bermuda when L. humile arrived in the 1940s. This new invader quickly overran much territory, excluding P. megacephala. Pheidole megacephala, however, persisted, and ever since, these two species have been contesting ever-shifting battlefronts between mutually exclusive territories. Largely ignored in this drama, however, are the other ant species in Bermuda.

Both P. megacephala and L. humile are well-known for killing off native invertebrates, particularly native ants (Erickson 1971; Human & Gordon 1996; Holway 1999; Vanderwoude et al. 2000; Wetterer et al. 2000; Wetterer et al. 2001; Wetterer 2002). This paper presents combined published, unpublished, and new ant records from Bermuda, provides an update on the conflict between the two dominant ant species, and examines the possible impact of the dominant ants on the other ant species that persist in Bermuda.

Published Ant Records from Bermuda

Many early accounts describe enormous ant plagues in Bermuda in the 17th and 19th centuries (Jones 1859; LeFroy 1882; Hurdis 1897; Kevan 1981), but no specimens of these ants are known and the species involved have never been identified. Wheeler (1906) proposed that the plague ants might have been Solenopsis geminata (F.) or Monomorium destructor (Jerdon).

In the first identification of an ant species from Bermuda, Kirby (1884) of the British Museum identified one ant species collected by the HMS Challenger expedition in April 1873 as Formica nigra L. (= Lasius niger (L.)). Kirby (1884) noted that this species was “probably introduced” and that “the specimens do not appear to differ from the ordinary European species.”

Dahl (1892) identified two species of ants from Bermuda, collected in 1889 by the Humboldt-Stiftung Expedition, as Pheidole pusillaHeer (= P. megacephala) and an Odontomachus species, “probably” Odontomachus insularis Guérin-Méneville.

Verrill (1902) reported that on expeditions to Bermuda in 1898-1901 “ants of several undetermined species were collected by us which have not yet been fully studied by a specialist.” Nonetheless, Verrill (1902) recognized specimens of the “small House-ant” Monomorium minutum (Buckley) (= Monomorium monomoriumBolton) and the “Garden-ant or Pavement-ant” Tetramorium caespitum (L.), and wrote: “probably these were early introduced from England.” In addition, Verrill (1902) received from V. Hayward specimens of P. megacephala collected on St. David’s Island, and received from L. Mowbray “a few Hymenoptera, including males, females, and very small workers of one or two species of the genus Pheidole, as determined by Mr. Th. Pergande. These are common, as House-ants, and destructive.” Verrill (1902) also mentioned “a few ants,” found in guts of the endemic Bermuda lizard Eumeces longirostris Cope. Finally, Verrill (1902) cited Kirby’s (1884) record of the “European Black ant” L. niger, and Dahl’s (1892) records of P. megacephala and Odontomachus sp. near insulans.

Wheeler (1906) made a comprehensive list of Bermuda ants, based on the three past accounts (Kirby 1884; Dahl 1892; Verrill 1902) and on new specimens supplied by T. Kincaid and J. H. Comstock. Of the 11 taxa on his list, Wheeler (1906) examined specimens of eight: Hypoponera opaciceps (Mayr), Odontomachus haematodes insularis ruginodis Smith (= O. ruginodis), Cardiocondyla emeryi Forel, P. megacephala, Brachymyrmex heeri Forel, Brachymyrmex heeri obscurior Forel (= B. obscurior), Prenolepis kincaidi Wheeler (= Paratrechina vividula (Nylander)), and Prenolepis sp. The other three records came from previously published reports: L. niger, M. minutum (= M. monomorium), and T. caespitum. Wheeler (1906) believed, however, that the last two records were probably misidentifications of Monomorium pharaonis (L.) and Tetramorium guineense (Bernard) respectively.

Ogilvie (1928) presented a Bermuda ant list that was the same as Wheeler’s (1906), except that it included O. haematodes insularis (= O. insularis) instead of O. ruginodis, and omitted Prenolepis sp.

Starting in 1927, Haskins repeatedly visited Bermuda, recording the ecological dominance of P. megacephala (Haskins 1939). Haskins (1939) noted that O. insularis was common in 1927, but became rare in the 1930s, writing: “In the few Odontomachus colonies remaining on the Islands great numbers of Pheidole workers are to be found killing and carrying off the larvae, fastening themselves in myriads to the bodies of the workers, and forcing their early abandonment of the site. Within another ten years, the Ponerine [Odontomachus] species, which inhabited Bermuda as its undisturbed Arthropod mistress for millennia, and has in fact developed a characteristic variety there, will have been exterminated.”

The first published record of L. humile in Bermuda included it as prey recovered from stomachs of exotic Anolis lizards (Simmonds 1958). Simmonds (1958) found 4105 prey in 176 Anolis grahami Gray specimens, of which 2176 were ants (21% L. humile, 26% P. megacephala, 52% Brachymyrmex sp., 2% ant species A), and 587 prey in 46 Anolis leachi Duméril & Birron specimens of which 153 were ants (97% L. humile, 3% Brachymyrmex sp.). Bennett & Hughes (1959) reported that L. humile “was first recorded in Bermuda in 1948 and has since become numerous.” Further, Bennett & Hughes (1959) reported that L. humile was gradually replacing P. megacephala. Nonetheless, Wingate (1965) found that P. megacephala was still common among 319 ant prey of 30 Anolis roquet (Lacépède) (12% L. humile, 85% P. megacephala, 3% B. obscurior).

Haskins & Haskins (1965) documented interactions in Bermuda between P. megacephala and L. humile, with some mention of other ant species, e.g., noting that “in 1933, no O. insularis could be found,” and that areas not occupied by either of the dominant species, “were extensively occupied by colonies of B. heeri, and required considerably more careful examination. Occasional colonies of Ponera opaciceps [= H. opaciceps] were also found in such areas.”

Crowell (1968) further studied P. megacephala and L. humile in Bermuda and noted four other ant species: B. obscurior, O. insularis, Wasmannia auropunctata (Roger), and Paratrechina sp. Crowell (1968) wrote: “the presence of Wasmannia auropunctata has been recognized by the Bermuda Department of Agriculture and Fisheries since 1950." Lieberburg et al. (1975), in another study of L. humile and P. megacephala in Bermuda, noted six other ant species: B. heeri, H. opaciceps, Odontomachus brunneus(Patten), W. auropunctata, Cardiocondyla sp., and Paratrechina sp. Crowell (1968) added a personal communication from C. Haskins who found one O. insularis colony in 1965.

Kempf (1972), in his catalog of Neotropical ants, listed ten taxa known from Bermuda: B. heeri, Brachymyrmex heeri aphidicola Forel (= B. obscurior), B. obscurior, C. emeryi, H. opaciceps, O. insularis, O. ruginodis, P. megacephala, Plagiolepis alluaudi Forel, and T. caespitum. Brandão (1991), in his addendum to Kempf’s (1972) catalog, listed B. obscurior, O. brunneus, O. insularis, and P. vividula from Bermuda.

Haskins & Haskins (1988) revisited Bermuda for a “final survey” of P. megacephala and L. humile. Haskins & Haskins (1988) wrote that “the genus Odontomachus (insularis and brunnei) . . . is now a rare form. Other long-term survivors include the genus Brachymyrmex (still relatively abundant in niches unoccupied by either tramp ant) and the genera Paratrechina, Cardiocondyla, Hypoponera, and Wasmannia.”

Hilburn et al. (1990) listed 14 ant taxa reported from Bermuda, eight apparently based on specimens (B. heeri, Brachymyrmex sp., C. emeryi, L. humile, Monomorium sp., Paratrechina sp., P. megacephala, and W. auropunctata) and six apparently from published reports (H. opaciceps, L. niger, M. pharaonis, O. brunneus, P. vividula, and T. caespitum). Hilburn et al. (1990) also listed three additional ant species that had been intercepted on goods being imported into Bermuda, but had not become established (Camponotus noveboracensis (Fitch), Crematogaster sp., and Paratrechina longicornis(Latreille)).

Materials and Methods

We looked for Bermuda ant specimens in the collections of the American Museum of Natural History, New York (AMNH), the Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia (ANS), the Bermuda Aquarium, Museum and Zoo (BAMZ), the Bermuda Dept. of Agriculture (BDOA), British Natural History Museum in London (BNHM), Harvard’s Museum of Comparative Zoology (MCZ), the Smithsonian Institute (SI), and Yale’s Peabody Museum (YPM).

From 27 February to 5 March 2002, we surveyed ants using visual search in a wide range of habitats. Our sites included both highly disturbed environments (e.g., port areas in Hamilton, St. George, and Ireland Island North) and lesser-disturbed reserve areas (e.g., Spittal Pond and Paget Marsh). We also surveyed ants on two small, isolated islands, Nonsuch and Horn. These two islands are nesting areas for the endemic cahow (Pterodroma cahowNichols & Mowbray). In addition, we resurveyed ten sites that Haskins & Haskins (1988) had repeatedly surveyed to evaluate changes over time in which ant species dominated an area. In June-August 2002, A. Lines, W. Sterrer, and Z. Amaral of the BAMZ collected additional ant specimens.

Stefan Cover examined most specimens. Mark Deyrup examined all specimens with uncertain identifications. Further evaluations were made by Xavier Espadaler (Monomorium, Plagiolepis), Bernhardt Seifert (Cardiocondyla), and James Trager (Paratrechina, Crematogaster). We will deposit vouchers at the BAMZ, MCZ, and Archbold Biological Station.

Results

We examined ant specimens from Bermuda representing 20 ant species, including nine new records (Table 1; for details species accounts). At the BNHM, we did not find the specimens Kirby (1884) identified as Lasius niger. At the YPM, Raymond Pupedis (pers. comm.) found catalog numbers for Hymenoptera specimens in alcohol collected in Bermuda: 4916-4928 (April 1901, AE Verrill & WJ Van Name) and 5003-5008 (Dec 1901, TG Goslin). We did not, however, find any of Verrill’s ant specimens in the pinned collection. Chris Cutler searched through all available old vials and bottles in the Yale collection with no success.

In 2002, we found L. humile in large numbers at all ten sites studied by Haskins & Haskins (1988; see Table 2). At four of the sites, we also found P. megacephala (Table 2). At the intersection of Knapton Hill Road and Harrington Hundreds, we found L. humile to the north of Knapton Hill Road and P. megacephala south of the road. At Spittal Pond Reserve, we found L. humile throughout, except for P. megacephala at the eastern entrance and parking area. At Newstead Hotel complex, we found L. humile throughout, except for P. megacephala at the westernmost end. Finally, on Ireland Island North, we found L. humile in all areas we searched, except for P. megacephala on the northeast corner, east of the entrance to the Maritime Museum and out the entire length of the North Breakwater, which serves as a cruise ship terminal.

Species Accounts

+ = new record for Bermuda. Collectors: H = DJ Hilburn et al., W = JK Wetterer & AL Wetterer in 2002, Collections: BDOA = Bermuda Department of Agriculture, BAMZ = Bermuda Museum, Aquarium and Zoo, BNHM = British Natural History Museum, London, MCZ = Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, YPM = Yale Peabody Museum.

1. Brachymyrmex heeri Forel

Specimens examined: No site data (1905, T Kincaid, MCZ). Near Hamilton (1910, EG Vanatta, ANS). Padet (sic.) Marsh (1922, HH Whelzel, MCZ). Paget (1925, L Ogilvie, MCZ). No site data (1925, L Ogilvie, AMNH). Hamilton (1934, NA Weber, MCZ). Many sites (1987-1988, H, BAMZ). Admiralty House (1987, H, BAMZ - male labeled “prob. Dolichoderine male det DR Smith”). BAMZ Ops (2001, L. Hinton, BAMZ). Bermuda Biological Station for Research (BBSR), under boards in wooded area (W). Blue Hole Park, forested area (W). Hamilton, waterfront, in a flower planter (W). Wreck Road (W). Jenning’s Road (2002, A Lines).

Wheeler (1906), Haskins (1939), Haskins & Haskins (1965), Kempf (1972), Lieberburg et al. (1975), and Hilburn et al. (1990) all recorded this species in Bermuda and it was the most common ant in the collections of Kincaid (in 1905) and Ogilvie (in 1925) in the MCZ. It was also common in Hilburn et al.’s collection of 1987-88. We collected this species in both natural and highly disturbed areas. This very small, orange, New World species is widespread and probably fairly common in Bermuda, but often overlooked because of its very small size.

2. Brachymyrmex obscurior Forel

Specimens examined: No site data (1905, T Kincaid, MCZ). Paget (1925, L Ogilvie, MCZ). Hamilton (1934, NA Weber, MCZ). Hamilton (1966, KM, BAMZ, male and queen). Paget (1971, N Krauss, SI). Many sites (1987-1988, H, BAMZ). Paget Parish (1987, H, BAMZ, labeled “Paratrechina sp. det DR Smith”). St. George’s (1987, R Gordon, BAMZ, queen, labeled “Paratrechina sp. det. D.R. Smith”). 19 sites (W).

Wheeler (1906), Simmonds (1958), Wingate (1965), Crowell (1968), Kempf (1972), Haskins & Haskins (1988), and Brandão (1991) all recorded the presence of B. obscurior in Bermuda. As noted in the specimens listed above, we found B. obscurior specimens in the BAMZ collection misidentified as “Paratrechina sp.” Many others were labeled “Brachymyrmex sp.”. Records listed as Brachymyrmex sp. and Paratrechina sp. by Hilburn et al. (1990) were probably all B. obscurior.

We collected B. obscurior at 19 locales across Bermuda, often in areas with dense populations of P. megacephala or L. humile. In some localities, where neither P. megacephala or L. humile were present (e.g., forest areas near Blue Hole), we found only this species and/or B. heeri. It appears to be the second most common ant species in Bermuda, after L. humile. We expect that a close inspection would find these ants at virtually every site in Bermuda. This New World species is extremely variable in size and color, making identification much more difficult.

+3. Camponotus pennsylvanicus (De Geer)

Specimens examined: Rockville Close, inside house (2002, E Beek, BDOA). Same site (W). Rockville Close, Bermuda Lumber Company (W).

A resident in Rockville Close reported to the BDOA that ants first she exterminated in her house in August 2001 had returned in January 2002. We collected specimens at the same house. At a lumberyard a few blocks away, employees told us that they often saw large ants. We searched an area where they had killed the ants earlier that day under Virginia cedar lumber from Florida, and found one live and several dead C. pennsylvanicus workers. It is unclear whether this North American carpenter ant is actually established in Bermuda. This species has a broad range in the US, from Pennsylvania to Florida, so it seems likely that climate would not limit its establishment in Bermuda. The BDOA had a number of samples of this species intercepted by quarantine in the past few years, often on imported Christmas trees and lumber (see below).

4. Cardiocondyla emeryi Forel

Specimens examined: No site data (1905, T Kincaid, AMNH). Ireland Island North, in grassy area outside clayworks (W).

Wheeler (1906), Kempf (1972), Lieberburg et al. (1975), Haskins & Haskins (1988), and Hilburn et al. (1990) also noted the presence of C. emeryi. This African native, though apparently not very common, certainly appears to be established in Bermuda. Due to its very small size, it is probably often overlooked.

+5. Cardiocondyla obscurior Wheeler

Specimen examined: Paget Parish (1987, H, BAMZ). Identified by S. Cover & B. Seifert.

This Old World tramp species is often misidentified as another tramp, C. wroughtonii, but may be distinguished from this species based on coloration and discriminate function analysis (Seifert 2003). Due to its small size, the species often may be overlooked.

+6. Crematogaster sp. male

Specimen examined: Berry Hill Road, light trap (1987, H, BAMZ, one male). James Trager identified this specimen as Crematogaster sp., Mark Deyrup concurred.

This species, collected only once, appears to be rare in Bermuda.

7. Hypoponera opaciceps (Mayr)

Specimens examined: Spittal Pond, black light (1987, H, BAMZ, one queen). Spittal Pond, under rock (W). Spittal Pond, near Spanish Rock (W). Ireland Island North, under board by dock (W, one queen), Jenning’s Road (2002, A Lines).

Wheeler (1906), Haskins & Haskins (1965, 1988), Kempf (1972), and Lieberburg et al. (1975) reported this species. Hilburn et al. (1990) questioned this record as “probably misidentified or no longer established,” but the BAMZ actually had a specimen collected by Hilburn. We found a small area near Spanish Rock where H. opaciceps was the only species present. This New World native is largely subterranean, and often overlooked.

+8. Hypoponera punctatissima (Roger)

Specimen examined: Hamilton (1910, EG Vanatta, ANS, one queen).

We have seen only one specimen of H. punctatissima from Bermuda. It is a well-known tramp species distributed throughout the tropics and subtropics and almost certainly an exotic in Bermuda. Due to its subterranean habits, H. punctatissima is probably often overlooked.

9. Linepithema humile (Mayr)

Specimens examined: No site data (1953, FD Bennett, BNHM). Many sites (1987-1988, H, BAMZ). 25 sites in Bermuda (W). Walsingham Jungle (2002, A. Lines). Spittal Pond (2002, A. Lines).

Starting with Bennett & Hughes (1959), every paper on Bermuda ants recorded this species. This South American native is currently the most common ant in Bermuda in both terms of the number of sites we found this species and in terms of its extremely high densities at these sites. We found this ant almost everywhere we collected in Bermuda, though we did not find it on three small islands we surveyed: Nonsuch Island, Horn Island, and Ordinance Island.

10. Monomorium monomorium Bolton

Specimens examined: Spittal Pond (1987, H, BAMZ, male labeled “Monomorium sp. male det DR Smith”). Ordinance Island, flowerbeds (W). Identified by X. Espadaler.

Verrill (1902) identified Monomorium minutum (= M. monomorium) and specimens of M. monomorium collected in 1987 and 2002 support this identification. Hilburn et al. (1990) list the above 1987 specimen as Monomorium sp. We collected this species at only one site, Ordinance Island, a small island where ships dock, connected to the town of St. George’s by a bridge. Monomorium monomorium is common in the Mediterranean. In the West Indies it has been recorded in Barbados (Kempf 1972).

11. Odontomachus ruginodis Smith

Specimens examined: No site data (1905, T Kincaid, AMNH). Near Sharks Hole (1910, EG Vanatta, ANS, labeled O. haematodes insularis det Gregg 1956). Nonsuch Island (1931, no collector data, AMNH, labeled O. haematodes insularis). Walsingham Jungle (2002, A Lines & W Sterrer, BAMZ). Identified by M. Deyrup.

Dahl (1892) identified Bermuda specimens as “probably” Odontomachus insularis. Wheeler (1906) recorded a closely related variety, now considered a separate species: O. ruginodis. Later authors list one or two Odontomachus species from Bermuda: O. insularis and/or O. brunneus. Based on worker morphology, Brown (1976) regarded O. ruginodis as synonymous with O. brunneus. Brown (in Deyrup et al. 1985), however, changed his mind, and again separated them into two distinct species. Because all specimens that we examined were O. ruginodis, we will assume that all other published records were this species as well.

Jeremy Madeiros (Bermuda Department of Conservation Services, pers. comm.) reported seeing this large trap-jaw ant twice at night in 2001, on Long Rock and near Spanish Rock. We searched the area around Spanish Rock for more than an hour without finding this ant. After we left Bermuda, Alex Lines & Wolfgang Sterrer of the BAMZ, collected two specimens in Walsingham. This species used to be common in Bermuda but now appears to be quite rare (see Introduction). It is considered to be native to the West Indies and the Bahamas (Deyrup et al. 1998), but may be exotic in Florida (Deyrup 1991).

+12. Paratrechina longicornis (Latreille)

Specimens examined: Brighton Nursery, on Poinsettia from California (1990, no collector data, BDOA). Hamilton, three sites (W). Ireland Island North, four sites (W).

Hilburn et al. (1990) recorded this species as intercepted on imported plants in 1971 and on imported Dahlia bulbs in 1987, but considered it not established in Bermuda. We found P. longicornis well established over broad stretches of the Hamilton waterfront as well as on a large portion of Ireland Island North. This conspicuous Old World tramp has never before been recorded out of quarantine in Bermuda.

13. Paratrechina vividula (Nylander)

Specimens examined: No site data (1905, T Kincaid, MCZ, types for Prenolepis kincaidi). Paget (1925, L Ogilvie, MCZ).

Paratrechina vividula has not been collected since 1925 and may be extinct in Bermuda. This Old World tramp species has been widely distributed through human commerce.

14. Pheidole megacephala(F)

Specimens examined: No site data (no date, Pergande collection, SI, “480” - probably collected ∼1890). No site data (1905, T Kincaid, MCZ & AMNH), Five sites (1910, EG Vanatta, ANS). Padet Marsh (1922, HH Whelzel, MCZ). Cooper’s Island (1922, HC Hoyt, ANS). Hamilton (1934, NA Weber, MCZ). Paget (NLH Krauss, 1971, SI). Many sites (1987-1988, H, BAMZ). 15 sites (W). Brimstone Hill (2002, Z. Amaral). Lambda Island (2002, A. Lines).

Every paper on Bermuda ants beginning with Dahl (1892) has recorded P. megacephala. Of 122 specimens collected by Vanatta in 1910, 117 were P. megacephala, suggesting that this species was dominant in Bermuda at this time. At the ten sites repeatedly surveyed since 1963, the latest survey found P. megacephala at four sites and L. humileat all ten, the lowest ratio of P. megacephala to L. humile yet recorded. Still, we found P. megacephala in numerous other sites in Bermuda, including three islands where L. humile was absent: Nonsuch Island, Horn Island, and Ordinance Island.

15. Plagiolepis alluaudi Forel

Specimens examined: No site data (1945, Stern & Pruit, SI, “NY-95303 46-1072 Surinam Cherry lvs”). No site data (1950, no collector data, SI, “NY110550 50-3046 on Zebrina pendula cut”). No site data (1950, no collector data, SI, “52-3330”), Warwick Parish (1987, J Hendrickson, BAMZ, “Brightside on Cassia”).

Kempf (1972) listed this species in the New World from Bermuda, St. Kitts, and St. Lucia. This small orange ant is an African tramp species that has been spread around the world, particularly in the Pacific, through human commerce (Wilson & Taylor 1967).

+16. Solenopsis (Diplorhoptrum) sp.

Specimens examined: Hamilton (1934, NA Weber, MCZ). Brimstone Hill (2000, no collector data, BDOA), BBSR, under boards and under concrete (W). Hamilton, waterfront, in planters (W). Hamilton, around Ambouy Point (W).

We suspect that this small orange thief ant is probably common throughout Bermuda, but generally overlooked due to its size and primarily subterranean habits. Thief ants commonly persist at high densities in areas invaded by dominant exotic ants such as P. megacephala and L. humile(Wetterer et al. 2001). The taxonomy of thief ants is in disarray and more than one species of thief ant may have been collected in Bermuda.

+17. Tetramorium caldarium Roger

Specimen examined: Newstead Hotel complex, west end (W).

We collected a single T. caldarium worker found battling with a P. megacephala worker on a bare dirt bank. It is the only species that we found for the first time in 2002. This Old World tramp species appears to be rare in Bermuda.

+18. Tetramorium simillimum (Smith)

Specimens examined: Padet Marsh (1922, HH Whelzel, MCZ). Ferry Point Park entrance, side of the road (W). Devonshire, Happy Talk Road (2002, A. Lines).

This Old World tramp species seems to have a long history in Bermuda but remains rare.

19. Wasmannia auropunctata (Roger)

Specimens examined: Paget (1925, L Ogilvie, MCZ).

We examined one W. auropunctata specimen collected by Ogilvie, though this species was not on Ogilvie’s (1928) list. Crowell (1968) recorded W. auropunctata and mentioned a 1950 record. Lieberburg et al. (1975), Haskins & Haskins (1988), and Hilburn et al. (1990) also reported W. auropunctata. Hilburn et al. (1990) wrote that this species is “now fairly common.” However, because we did not collect this ant and did not find any specimens collected by Hilburn, we believe that Hilburn and others may have mistaken other small orange ants in Bermuda (e.g., B. heeri, P. alluaudi, or Solenopsis sp.), as being W. auropunctata. Populations of W. auropunctata may have declined or become extinct in Bermuda. This ant was first recorded in Florida in 1924 and soon became a major pest. However, densities of W. auropunctata appear to have declined in many parts of Florida (Deyrup et al. 2000). Bermuda is the northernmost outdoor locale recorded for W. auropunctata (Wetterer & Porter 2003).

+20. Dacetine male

Specimen examined: Paget Parish, Malaise trap (1987, H, BAMZ, one male, labeled “Myrmacinae male, det DR Smith”).

No dacetines have been previously reported from Bermuda. Unfortunately, no one could identify this specimen to genus. Barry Bolton (BNHM, personal communication) wrote: “there is so little male-associated material that defining the genera on this sex just can’t be achieved yet. As far as I can tell, Strumigenys and Pyramica cannot be separated on males.” Xavier Espadaler determined that it was not a European species.

Unconfirmed Status (No Specimens Examined)

Lasius niger (L)

Although Kirby (1884) listed L. niger from Bermuda, Lasius specimens from Madeira and the Azores, originally identified as L. niger, have been recently reclassified as L. grandis (Seifert, 1992), so the same may be true for the Lasius of Bermuda. It is also possible that the ants were not Lasius at all. Clark (1930) re-examined other ant specimens evaluated by Kirby and considered his identifications and descriptions to be “worthless.” We did not find these specimens in the BNHM where Kirby worked.

Monomorium pharaonis(L)

Wheeler (1906) speculated without examination that Verrill’s (1902) M. monomorium specimens were actually M. pharaonis, a conclusion accepted by Ogilvie (1928) and Hilburn et al. (1990). Ogilvie (1928) wrote that M. pharaonis is a common house species, and Hilburn et al. (1990) wrote that it was “not an important household pest in Bermuda in recent years,” but it is unclear whether either actually examined any M. pharaonis specimens from Bermuda.

Paratrechina sp.

Crowell (1968), Lieberburg et al. (1975), Haskins & Haskins (1988), and Hilburn et al. (1990) reported an unidentified Paratrechina. Hilburn et al. (1990) wrote that this species was “now common and widespread.” However, all of the specimens from Hilburn et al. (1990) at the BAMZ labeled “Paratrechina sp.” were actually B. obscurior. The same may be true of the other records.

Prenolepis sp.

Wheeler (1906) wrote that the Prenolepis sp. sample collected by Kincaid included “seven workers, apparently all from the same colony, but varying much in size (from 2-3 mm). They are very pilose and pubescent, with subopaque surface and finely punctate mesonotum.” Wheeler (1906) felt that males were needed for definitive identification. We did not find these specimens at the MCZ, where Wheeler worked. It is possible that this species is a Paratrechina or perhaps a Plagiolepis.

Tetramorium caespitum (L)

Verrill (1902) recorded T. caespitum, the European “pavement ant,” in Bermuda. Wheeler (1906) speculated, without examining the specimens, that they were T. guineense. Tetramorium caespitum is common in Europe and Asia, as well as in the Azores. Tetramorium guineenseis native to Africa, though Wheeler (1906) was no doubt actually referring to Tetramorium bicarinatum (Nylander), a common tramp ant once considered a synonym of T. guineense. Unfortunately, we did not find any of Verrill’s specimens in the YPM, where he worked.

Ants Intercepted by Bermuda Department of Agriculture

Several species of ants in the BDOA collection were intercepted on incoming products, including: Camponotus floridanus, C. novoboracensis, C. pennsylvanicus, Camponotus sp. near pennsylvanicus, Camponotus zonatus, Crematogaster steinheili, and Pheidole moerens.

Discussion

Our study confirms the conclusions of earlier research (Haskins & Haskins 1965, 1988; Crowell 1968; Lieberburg et al. 1975) that Bermuda is largely partitioned between two dominant ant species, Pheidole megacephala and Linepithema humile. Although P. megacephala appeared to show a resurgence in the late 1960s and early 1970s (Table 2, Haskins & Haskins 1988), L. humile now has the upper-hand, dominating most parts of the main islands of Bermuda. The recent populations of P. megacephala in Bermuda appear to be the lowest recorded. Still, this species persists in pockets on the main islands and on small islands not connected to the main islands. We found that P. megacephala dominated and L. humile was absent on two small islands, Nonesuch and Horn, with breeding population of cahow (Pterodroma cahow), an endangered endemic bird. The absence of L. humile is relatively good news for the cahow because L. humile seems to pose a greater threat to ground-nesting birds than does P. megacephala. For example, Newell & Barber (1913) observed L. humile attacking young birds, swarming over and devouring nestlings.

In additional to the two dominant species, we examined specimens of 18 other ant species from Bermuda. Brachymyrmex obscurior, though small and inconspicuous, is very common in Bermuda and coexists with both L. humile and P. megacephala. Paratrechina longicornis, which was not previously reported from Bermuda, has substantial populations in two urban areas. Three other ant species appear to be well established, but very inconspicuous due to their very small size (Brachymyrmex heeri and Solenopsis sp.) or subterranean habits (Hypoponera opaciceps). The rest of the recorded ant species appear to be rare. Only three ant species with confirmed records from Bermuda have not been collected recently (1987 or later): Hypoponera punctatissima, Paratrechina vividula, and Wasmannia auropunctata. All three are common tramp species and almost certainly exotic to Bermuda.

It is an open question as to whether Bermuda ever had any native ants. It is feasible that Bermuda, like Hawaii, had no ants before people arrived. In fact, 13 of the 17 confirmed ant taxa in Bermuda identified to species are almost certainly exotic. Candidate for native status include Brachymyrmex heeri, Brachymyrmex obscurior, Hypoponera opaciceps, and Odontomachus ruginodis, all native to the West Indies and the Bahamas. Some species may have had native populations augmented by subsequent human-assisted immigration.

DNA analyses should be useful in evaluating native versus exotic status of ants in Bermuda, e.g., to determine whether or not populations of B. heeri, B. obscurior, H. opaciceps, and O. ruginodis show the genetic uniformity consistent with exotic introductions. DNA analyses may also allow evaluation of the geographic origins of populations of exotic species. DNA analyses of 35 of our L. humile specimens (five each from seven populations) showed that all individuals had the same haplotype for two mitochondrial markers (cytb and COI). These haplotypes have been found in one native Argentine population and in one introduced Chilean population, and but in no other introduced populations analyzed (V. Vogel et al., unpublished data; see Giraud et al. 2002).

More thorough ant surveys of Bermuda would be valuable. Of the 20 ant species with confirmed records from Bermuda, five have been collected only once. From this, we expect that there are several additional undocumented ant species established in Bermuda. The impact of ants on the native fauna and flora of Bermuda also deserves careful study.

Acknowledgments

We thank Wolfgang Sterrer, Jeremy Madeiros, David Wingate, Claire Jessey, Lisa Greene, & Steven DeSilva for help and encouragement in Bermuda; Stefan Cover, Mark Deyrup, Xavier Espadaler, Bernhardt Seifert, and James Trager for ant identification; Margaret Wetterer, Wolfgang Sterrer, and Mark Deyrup for comments on the manuscript; Raymond Pupedis and Chris Cutler for trying to find Verrill’s ants at Yale; Miguel Vazquez for help with the Resumen; Florida Atlantic University for financial support. This research was supported by a Wolfgang Sterrer Award from the Bermuda Biological Station for Research, Inc., and a David B. Wingate Research Grant Award from the Bermuda Zoological Society. This paper is Bermuda Biodiversity Contribution number 77.

References Cited

1.

F. D. Bennett and I. W. Hughes . 1959. Biological control of insect pests in Bermuda. Bull. Entomol. Res 50:423–436. Google Scholar

2.

C. R F. Brandão 1991. Adendos ao catálogo abreviado das formigas da região neotropical (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Rev. Brasileira Entomol 35:319–412. Google Scholar

3.

W. L. Brown Jr. 1976. Contributions toward a reclassification of the Formicidae. Part VI. Ponerinae, tribe Ponerini, subtribe Odontomachiti. Section A. Introduction, subtribal characters. Genus Odontomachus. Stud. Entomol 19:67–171. Google Scholar

4.

J. Clark 1930. New Formicidae, with notes on some little-known species. Proc. Royal Soc. Victoria 43:2–25. Google Scholar

5.

K. L. Crowell 1968. Rates of competitive exclusion by the Argentine ant in Bermuda. Ecology 49:551–555. Google Scholar

6.

F. Dahl 1892. Die Landfauna von Bermuda. In Ergebnisse der Plankton-Expedition 1889 der Humboldt-Stiftung (V. Hensen ed.) 1: 105-112. Google Scholar

7.

M. Deyrup 1991. Exotic ants of the Florida Keys. pp 15-22. In Proc. 4th Symp. Nat. Hist. Bahamas, Bahamian Field Station, San Salvador, Bahamas. Google Scholar

8.

M. Deyrup, L. Davis, and S. Buckner . 1998. Composition of the ant fauna of three Bahamian islands. pp. 23-31 In Proc. 7th Symp. Nat. Hist. Bahamas, Bahamian Field Station, San Salvador, Bahamas. Google Scholar

9.

M. Deyrup, L. Davis, and S. Cover . 2000. Exotic ants in Florida. Trans. American Entomol. Soc 126:293–326. Google Scholar

10.

M. Deyrup, J. Trager, and N. Carlin . 1985. The genus Odontomachus in the southeastern United States (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Entomol. News 96:188–195. Google Scholar

11.

J. M. Erickson 1971. The displacement of native ant species by the introduced Argentine ant Iridomyrmex humilis Mayr. Psyche 78:257–266. Google Scholar

12.

T. Giraud, J. S. Pedersen, and L. Keller . 2002. Evolution of supercolonies: The Argentine ants of southern Europe. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci 99:6075–6079. Google Scholar

13.

C. P. Haskins 1939. Of Ants and Men. Prentice-Hall, New York. 244 pp. Google Scholar

14.

C. P. Haskins and E. F. Haskins . 1965. Pheidole megacephala and Iridomyrmex humilis in Bermuda--equilibrium or slow replacement. Ecology 46:736–740. Google Scholar

15.

C. P. Haskins and E. F. Haskins . 1988. Final observations on Pheidole megacephala and Iridomyrmex humilis in Bermuda. Psyche 95:177–184. Google Scholar

16.

D. J. Hilburn, P. M. Marsh, and M. E. Schauff . 1990. Hymenoptera of Bermuda. Florida Entomol 73:161–176. Google Scholar

17.

D. A. Holway 1999. Competitive mechanisms underlying the displacement of native ants by the invasive Argentine ant. Ecology 80:238–251. Google Scholar

18.

K. G. Human and D. M. Gordon . 1996. Exploitation and interference competition between the invasive Argentine ant, Linepithema humile, and native ant species. Oecol 105:405–412. Google Scholar

19.

J. L. Hurdis 1897. Rough notes and memoranda relating to the natural history of the Bermudas. R. H. Porter, London. Google Scholar

20.

J. M. Jones 1859. The Naturalist in Bermuda. Reeves & Turner, London. 200 pp. Google Scholar

21.

W. W. Kempf 1972. Catálogo abreviado das formigas da região neotropical (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Stud. Entomol 15:3–344. Google Scholar

22.

D. K M. Kevan 1981. The terrestrial arthropods of the Bermudas: an historical review of our knowledge. Arch. Nat. Hist. 10:1–29. Google Scholar

23.

W. F. Kirby 1884. On the Hymenoptera collected during the recent expedition of H.M.S. “Challenger”. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. ser. 5 XIII:403–413. Google Scholar

24.

J. H. LeFroy 1882. Historye of the Bermudaes or Summer Islands. Edited from a manuscript written circa 1619-25 in the Sloane Collection, British Museum. Hakluyt Society, London. Google Scholar

25.

I. Lieberburg, P. M. Kranz, and A. Seip . 1975. Bermudian ants revisited: the status and interaction of Pheidole megacephala and Iridomyrmex humilis. Ecology 56:473. 478. Google Scholar

26.

W. Newell and T. C. Barber . 1913. The Argentine Ant. United States Dept. Agric., Bur. Entomol., Bull. 122. Google Scholar

27.

L. Ogilvie 1928. The insects of Bermuda. Dept. Agric., Bermuda, Hamilton. Google Scholar

28.

B. Seifert 1992. A taxonomic revision of the Palaearctic members of the ant subgenus Lasius s. str. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Abh. Ber. Naturkundem. Goerlitz 66:51–66. Google Scholar

29.

B. Seifert 2003. The ant genus Cardiocondyla (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)--a taxonomic revision of the elegans, bulgarica, batesii, nuda, shuckardi, stambuloffii, wroughtonii, emeryi, and minutior species groups. Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums Wien (In press). Google Scholar

30.

F. J. Simmonds 1958. The effect of lizards on the biological control of scale insects in Bermuda. Bull. Entomol. Res 49:601–612. Google Scholar

31.

C. Vanderwoude, L. A. Lobry de Bruyn, and A. P N. House . 2000. Response of an open-forest ant community to invasion by the introduced ant, Pheidole megacephala. Austral Ecol 25:253–259. Google Scholar

32.

A. E. Verrill 1902. The Bermuda Islands, an account of their scenery, climate, physiography, natural history, and geology with Sketches of Their Discovery and Early History, and the Changes in Their Flora and Fauna Due to Man. Trans. Connecticut Acad. Arts Sci 11:413–956. Google Scholar

33.

J. K. Wetterer 2002. Ants of Tonga. Pacific Sci 56:125–136. Google Scholar

34.

J. K. Wetterer and S. D. Porter . 2003. The little fire ant, Wasmannia auropunctata: distribution, impact, and control. Sociobiol 42:1–41. Google Scholar

35.

J. K. Wetterer, P. S. Ward, A. L. Wetterer, J. T. Longino, J. C. Trager, and S. E. Miller . 2000. Ants of Santa Cruz Island, California. Bull. South. California Acad. Sci 99:25–31. Google Scholar

36.

J. K. Wetterer, A. L. Wetterer, and E. Hebard . 2001. Impact of the Argentine ant, Linepithema humile (Mayr), on the native ants of Santa Cruz Island, California. Sociobiol 38:709–721. Google Scholar

37.

W. M. Wheeler 1906. The ants of the Bermudas. Bull. American Mus. Nat. Hist 22:347–352. Google Scholar

38.

E. O. Wilson and R. W. Taylor . 1967. Ants of Polynesia. Pacific Insects Monogr 14:1–109. Google Scholar

39.

D. B. Wingate 1965. Terrestrial herpetofauna of Bermuda. Herpetol 21:202–218. Google Scholar

Appendices

Table 1.

Ants of Bermuda.

i0015-4040-87-2-212-t01.gif

Table 2.

Sites surveyed by Haskins & Haskins (in 1963-1986) and the present study (in 2002).

i0015-4040-87-2-212-t02.gif
James K. Wetterer and Andrea L. Wetterer "Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of Bermuda," Florida Entomologist 87(2), 212-221, (1 June 2004). https://doi.org/10.1653/0015-4040(2004)087[0212:AHFOB]2.0.CO;2
Published: 1 June 2004
JOURNAL ARTICLE
10 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top