Translator Disclaimer
1 March 2008 Efficacy of Entomopathogenic Nematodes Versus Diaprepes abbreviatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Larvae in a High Clay-Content Oxisol Soil: Greenhouse Trials With Potted Litchi chinensis
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

In a previous study, laboratory trials indicated that 9 strains and species of entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) were pathogenic against larvae of Diaprepes abbreviatus in an Oxisol from Puerto Rico. In this study we tested the efficacy of 5 species/strains of EPN in an Oxisol under greenhouse conditions. The nematodes were applied at 100 infective juveniles per cm2 to 19-L pots containing a high clay-content Oxisol (69% clay) and 3 seedlings of Litchi chinensis. All treatments significantly reduced the mean proportion of D. abbreviatus larvae surviving (ranging from 0 to 36%) compared to survival in untreated controls (ranging from 80 to 86%). This suggests that EPNs might be suitable to play a role in integrated pest management strategies against D. abbreviatus in tropical soils with high clay content.

Diaprepes abbreviatus (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) is a key pest of a wide variety of crops in Puerto Rico (Martorell 1976; O’Brien & Wibmer 1982). Adults feed on the foliage of fruit trees and other hosts (Simpson et al. 1996) and the larvae attack the roots, reducing yield, allowing the ingress of pathogenic organisms, or directly killing the tree by removing cortex from the roots, especially in seedlings (Knapp et al. 2000; Nigg et al. 2001; Quintela et al. 1998). Litchi chinensis Sonn. (Sapindaceae) is a tropical/subtropical fruit tree native to southern China (Morton 1987). Because of its marketability, some growers in Puerto Rico are attempting to cultivate orchards of L. chinensis, but there are currently no recommendations for dealing with the pests associated with this fruit tree in Puerto Rico, including D. abbreviatus. Recent surveys in Puerto Rico indicate that L. chinensis is a suitable host for D. abbreviatus and can suffer significant damage from the root-feeding larvae of this pest (Jenkins, unpublished data).

Entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) have a mutualistic association with bacteria found in their intestine and the nematodes are obligate parasites of insects (Poinar 1990). The infective juveniles move through the soil, either actively searching for suitable hosts or relying on the host to come to them (Lewis et al. 2006). The infective juveniles enter the host through natural openings, such as spiracles, the anus, or the mouth (Poinar 1990). Once inside the host, the nematodes release the mutualistic bacteria, which kill the host within 48 h (Poinar 1990). Two or 3 generations of nematodes are completed within the host cadaver before infective juveniles are released into the soil to search out new hosts (Poinar 1990).

Entomopathogenic nematodes have had a demonstrable effect against many soil-borne insect pests, including D. abbreviatus (McCoy et al. 2000; Shapiro-Ilan et al. 2002, 2005). However, it is generally thought that soils of high clay content, such as those common in Puerto Rico, reduce the efficacy of EPNs as biocontrol agents of soil-borne insect pests (Duncan et al. 2001; McCoy et al. 2002). Indeed, several studies have indicated that nematode dispersal is hampered in soils of high clay-content (Georgis & Poinar 1983; Barbercheck & Kaya 1991; Portillo-Aguilar et al. 1999). However, virulence and persistence of Steinernema riobrave (Cabanillas, Poinar & Raulston) and Heterorhabditis bacteriophora Poinar appeared to improve in a higher clay-content Entisol when compared to a sandy Spodosol and a sandy Entisol (Shapiro et al. 2000). Furthermore, recent laboratory trials indicated that some EPNs were efficacious in high clay-content Oxisols found in Puerto Rico (Jenkins et al. 2007).

The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of 5 species/strains of EPNs under greenhouse conditions in a larger volume of high clay-content soil than had been assayed in earlier laboratory trials. This would more rigorously test the EPN’s ability to locate their host in an experiment that more closely resembles a nursery or an orchard setting.

Materials and Methods

Soil (Oxisol, Coto clay, clayey, kaolinitc isohypoerthermic Typic Hapludox) was collected from the USDA-ARS Experiment Station in Isabela, P.R. The soil composition, determined by the hydrometer method, was 29.55% sand, 13.92% silt, and 60.88% clay and had a pH of 8.07. The proportion of total nitrogen in the soil, determined by the micro-Kjeldahl method, was 0.20. The concentration of other critical elements in the soil was determined by atomic absorption spectroscopy (K, Ca, Mg, Cu, Fe, Mn, and Zn) or the Bray II Method (P) and were as follows: P = 35 μg/g; K = 170 μg/g; Ca = 2,842 μg/g; Mg = 61 μg/g; Cu = not detected; Fe = not detected; Mn = 123 μg/g; and Zn = 4 μg/g.

Soil (22-23 kg) was placed into 19-L buckets (bucket dimensions = mouth diameter of 29 cm and depth of 36 cm). Three L. chinensis seedlings were planted in the soil in each bucket. Ten 9th through 11th instars of D. abbreviatus, obtained from the Florida Division of Plant Industry, were placed in 10 holes, each 10 cm deep, made with an auger around the 3 L. chinensis seedlings. Holes were manually filled with soil after placement of larvae.

Five strains/species of EPNs were assayed against larvae of D. abbreviatus: S. riobrave (strains 355, 7-12, and TP), S. diaprepesi Nguyen & Duncan, and Heterorhabditis megidis Poinar, Jackson, & Klein (UK211 strain). Prior to the assays, nematodes were reared in last instars of the greater wax moth, Galleria mellonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). All nematodes were reared at 25 ± 1°C according to procedures described in Kaya & Stock (1997). After harvesting nematodes from G. mellonella, the nematodes were stored in tap water at 13°C (Kaya & Stock 1997) for up to 1 week prior to the assays. Viability of all nematodes was >90% at the time of application.

Nematodes were applied 24 h after placement of D. abbreviatus larvae at the rate of 100 infective juveniles per cm2 in 1 L of water (surface area of soil = 660 cm2 × 100 infective juveniles/cm2 = 66,000 infective juveniles/bucket). Control buckets were treated with 1 L of water poured evenly over the soil surface. Buckets were then placed in a greenhouse at the USDA-ARS Tropical Agriculture Research Station in Mayaguez, PR (mean temperature 25°C, RH 74%). Each treatment was replicated 5 times and the entire experiment was repeated in a second trial a month later. After 14 d, the experimental units were dismantled and the number of living D. abbreviatus larvae was recorded in each bucket. Dead larvae were inspected under the microscope to confirm that death was caused by nematodes. Nematodes reared from cadavers were placed in a Petri-dish with 5 G. mellonella larvae and monitored to confirm pathogenicity.

Analysis of variance (PROC GLM) and Student-Newman-Keuls multiple range test (SAS 2003) were used to analyze the effect of EPN species/strain on the survival of D. abbreviatus larvae. Statistical analyses were conducted on arcsine transformed data (percent surviving).

Results

Analysis indicated that survival of D. abbreviatus larvae was reduced by EPN (for trial 1, F = 20.24, P < 0.0001, df = 1,5; for trial 2, F = 45.11, P < 0.0001, df = 1,5) (Table 1). We detected no surviving larvae in the buckets receiving S. riobrave (TP strain) in Trial 1 or in buckets receiving S. riobrave (355 strain) in both trials (Table 1). In the first trial no species/strains of EPN could be statistically differentiated based on the proportion of surviving D. abbreviatus larvae (arcsine transformed), but in the second trial all S. riobrave strains caused significantly lower larval D. abbreviatus survivorship than did S. diaprepesi or H. megidis (Table 1).

Discussion

Our results demonstrate that EPNs can provide high levels of D. abbreviatussuppression in an Oxisol under greenhouse conditions. Entomopathogenic nematodes have been reported to control D. abbreviatus under greenhouse conditions previously (Shapiro & McCoy 2000a; Shapiro-Ilan et al. 2003), however, this is the first report of efficacy in potted plants in a high clay-content soil. Thus, it is clear that, under the conditions of this study, the Oxisol’s texture is not a significant impediment to nematode movement and infection. It may be argued that since we only placed the D. abbreviatus larvae 10 cm deep, the nematodes did not have far to travel. However, in every case larvae were found in the lower half of the soil column (18 cm or deeper) and more than 85% percent of the larvae were found within 10 cm of the bottom of the bucket.

Previous assays of EPNs in Puerto Rico used large numbers of infective juveniles (>1000/cm3 of soil) and achieved only minimal control of D. abbreviatus (<50% survival) (Román & Figueroa 1985; Figueroa & Román 1990). Many previous evaluations in Puerto Rico were restricted to Steinernema carpocapsae (=Neoaplectana carpocapsae) (Román & Beavers 1983; Román & Figueroa 1985), a nematode that tends to inhabit the surface of the soil and would have little chance of encountering root-feeding grubs that tend to be found deeper in the soil (Lewis et al. 2006).

Although the volume and weight of soil used in this study (19 L, 22 kg) was vastly larger than in a previously conducted laboratory assay (0.087 L, 0.4 kg), the species/strains of EPNs performed similarly in both studies (Jenkins et al. 2007). The mean proportion of larval D. abbreviatus surviving were remarkably similar in both assays for treatments with S. diaprepesi (0.32-0.36 for the current study and 0.33 for Jenkins et al. 2007) and H. megidis (0.24-0.30 for the current study and 0.25 for Jenkins et al. 2007). This is somewhat unexpected given the larger volume of soil used in the current experiments, but we do note that the earlier laboratory assay did use a lower rate of EPNs (40 infective juveniles per cm2) (Jenkins et al. 2007). The 7-12 strain of S. riobrave appeared to perform better in the laboratory assay (mean proportion surviving = 0; Jenkins et al. 2007) than in the current study (mean proportion surviving = 0.12-0.26) whereas the 355-strain of S. riobrave appeared to perform better in the current study (mean proportion surviving = 0 for both trials) than in the laboratory assay (mean proportion surviving = 0.08; Jenkins et al. 2007). Treatment with the TP-strain of S. riobrave resulted in 0 percent survival in both the current and the laboratory study (Jenkins et al. 2007).

This study provides evidence (Trial 2) that, under the conditions tested, performances of S. riobrave strains are superior to those of H. megidis and S. diaprepesi. Superior virulence of S. riobrave has been observed previously in sandy soil (Shapiro & McCoy 2000b). In a laboratory study Stuart et al. (2004) observed superior virulence in the 7-12- and TP-strains of S. riobrave relative to the 355-strain, but no differences were observed among S. riobrave strains in our study. Nor was any difference among these strains observed in Jenkins et al. (2007). Possibly the discrepancy is due to different soil types (a sandy soil was used in the study of Stuart et al. 2004). The superior efficacy of S. riobrave indicates that this may be the nematode of choice for control of D. abbreviatus in an Oxisol. However, it is conceivable that other characteristics, such as persistence, could factor into the choice of nematode to use, e.g., S. diaprepesi is known to be highly persistent relative to S. riobrave, at least in its native soil (Duncan et al. 2003).

In summary, all 5 species/strains of EPNs assayed reduced the proportion of D. abbreviatus larvae surviving compared with the control treatment. The second trial indicated that all strains of S. riobrave were more efficacious than the other EPN species assayed. Field trials are needed to assess the efficacy of these EPNs under orchard conditions.

Acknowledgments

We thank Suzanne Fraser at the Florida Division of Plant Industry for providing us with Diaprepes abbreviatus larvae. We also thank Elkin Vargas for tremendous field and lab work and Ulises Chardon for analyzing the soil samples. Finally, we thank Robin Stuart and Wayne Gardner for reviewing earlier versions of this manuscript.

References Cited

1.

M. E. Barbercheck and H. K. Kaya . 1991. Effect of host condition and soil texture on host finding by the entomogenous nematodes Heterorhabditis bacteriophora (Rhabditida: Heterorhabditidae) and Steinernema carpocapsae (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae). Environ. Entomol 20:582–589. Google Scholar

2.

L. W. Duncan, J. G. Genta, and J. Zellers . 2001. Efficacy of Steinernema riobrave against larvae of Diaprepes abbreviatus in Florida soils of different textures. Nematropica 31:130. Google Scholar

3.

L. W. Duncan, J. H. Graham, D. C. Dunn, J. Zellers, C. W. McCoy, and K. Nguyen . 2003. Incidence of endemic entomopathogenic nematodes following application of Steinernema riobrave for control of Diaprepes abbreviatus. J. Nematol 35:178–186. Google Scholar

4.

W. Figueroa and J. Román . 1990. Parasitism of entomophilic nematodes on the sugarcane rootstalk borer, Diaprepes abbreviatus (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), larvae. J. Agric. Univ. Puerto Rico 74:197–202. Google Scholar

5.

R. Georgis and G. O. Poinar Jr. . 1983. Effect of soil temperature on the distribution and infectivity of Neoaplectana carpocapsae (Nematoda: Steinernematidae). J. Nematol 15:308–311. Google Scholar

6.

D. A. Jenkins, D. Shapiro-Ilan, and R. Goenaga . 2007. Virulence of entomopathogenic nematodes against Diaprepes abbreviatus in an oxisol. Florida Entomol 90:401–403. Google Scholar

7.

H. K. Kaya and S. P. Stock . 1997. Techniques in insect nematology. In L. A. Lacey [ed.], Manual of Techniques in Insect Pathology. Academic, San Diego, CA. Google Scholar

8.

J. L. Knapp, S. E. Simpson, J. E. Peña, and H. N. Nigg . 2000. Diaprepes root weevil host list. Fla. Coop. Ext. Serv. ENY-641 ( http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu). Google Scholar

9.

E. E. Lewis, J. Campbell, C. Griffin, H. Kaya, and A. Peters . 2006. Behavioral ecology of entomopathogenic nematodes. Biol. Control 38:66–79. Google Scholar

10.

L. F. Martorell 1976. Annotated Food Plant Catalog of the Insects of Puerto Rico. Agric. Exp. Stn., Univ. Puerto Rico, Department of Entomology. 303 pp. Google Scholar

11.

C. W. McCoy, D. I. Shapiro, L. W. Duncan, and K. Nguyen . 2000. Entomopathogenic nematodes and other natural enemies as mortality factors for larvae of Diaprepes abbreviatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Biol. Control 19:182–190. Google Scholar

12.

C. W. McCoy, R. J. Stuart, L. W. Duncan, and K. Nguyen . 2002. Field efficacy of two commercial preparations of entomopathogenic nematodes against larvae of Diaprepes abbreviatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in alfisol type soil. Florida Entomol 85:537–544. Google Scholar

13.

J. F. Morton 1987. Fruits of Warm Climates. Media Incorporated, Greensboro, NC. 506 pp. Google Scholar

14.

H. N. Nigg, S. E. Simpson, N. E. El-Gholl, and F. G. Gmitter Jr. . 2001. Response of citrus root-stock seedlings to Diaprepes abbreviatus L. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) larval feeding. Proc. Florida. State Hort. Soc 114:57–64. Google Scholar

15.

C. W. O’Brien and G. J. Wibmer . 1982. Annotated Checklist of the Weevils (Curculionidae sensu lato) of North America, Central America and the West Indies (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Mem. American Entomol. Inst 34:1–382. Google Scholar

16.

G. O. Poinar Jr. 1990. Biology and taxonomy of Steinernematidae and Heterorhabditidae. pp. 23-62 In R. Gaugler and H. K. Kaya [eds.], Entomopathogenic Nematodes in Biological Control. CRC, Boca Raton, FL. Google Scholar

17.

C. Portillo-Aguilar, M. G. Villani, M. J. Tauber, C. A. Tauber, and J. P. Nyrop . 1999. Entomopathogenic nematode (Rhabditida: Heterorhabditidae and Steinernematidae) response to soil texture and bulk density. Environ. Entomol 28:1021–1035. Google Scholar

18.

E. D. Quintela, J. Fan, and C. W. McCoy . 1998. Development of Diaprepes abbreviatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on artificial and citrus root substrates. J. Econ. Entomol 91:1173–1179. Google Scholar

19.

J. Román and J. B. Beavers . 1983. A survey of Puerto Rican soils for entomogenous nematodes which attack Diaprepes abbreviatus (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J. Agric. Univ. Puerto Rico 67:311–316. Google Scholar

20.

J. Román and W. Figueroa . 1985. Control of the larva of the sugarcane rootstalk borer, Diaprepes abbreviatus (L), with the entomogenous nematode Neoaplectana carpocapsae Weiser. J. Agric. Univ. Puerto Rico 69:153–158. Google Scholar

21.

SAS 2003. Version 9.1. SAS Institute, Cary, NC. Google Scholar

22.

D. I. Shapiro and C. W. McCoy . 2000a. Susceptibility of Diaprepes abbreviatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) larvae to different rates of entomopathogenic nematodes in the greenhouse. Florida Entomol 83:1–9. Google Scholar

23.

D. I. Shapiro and C. W. McCoy . 2000b. Virulence of entomopathogenic nematodes to Diaprepes abbreviatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in the laboratory. J. Econ. Entomol 93:1090–1095. Google Scholar

24.

D. I. Shapiro, C. W. McCoy, A. Fares, T. Obreza, and H. Dou . 2000. Effects of soil type on virulence and persistence of entomopathogenic nematodes in relation to control of Diaprepes abbreviatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Environ. Entomol 29:1083–1087. Google Scholar

25.

D. I. Shapiro-Ilan, D. H. Gouge, and A. M. Koppenhöfer . 2002. Factors affecting commercial success: case studies in cotton, turf and citrus. pp. 333-355 In R. Gaugler [ed.], Entomopathogenic Nematology. CABI, New York, NY. Google Scholar

26.

D. I. Shapiro-Ilan, E. E. Lewis, W. L. Tedders, and Y. Son . 2003. Superior efficacy observed in entomopathogenic nematodes applied in infected-host cadavers compared with application in aqueous suspension. J. Invertebr. Pathol 83:270–272. Google Scholar

27.

D. I. Shapiro-Ilan, L. W. Duncan, L. A. Lacey, and R. Han . 2005. Orchard crops. pp. 215-230 In P. Grewal, R. U. Ehlers, and D. Shapiro-Ilan [eds.], Nematodes as Biological Control Agents. CABI Publishing, New York, NY. Google Scholar

28.

S. E. Simpson, H. N. Nigg, N. C. Coile, and R. A. Adair . 1996. Diaprepes abbreviatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): Host plant associations. Environ. Entomol 25:333–349. Google Scholar

29.

R. J. Stuart, D. I. Shapiro-Ilan, R. R. James, K. B. Nguyen, and C. W. McCoy . 2004. Virulence of new and mixed strains of the entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema riobrave to larvae of the citrus root weevil Diaprepes abbreviatus. Biol. Control 30:439–445. Google Scholar

Appendices

Table 1.

Proportion of Diaprepes abbreviatus larvae surviving after 14 d exposure to nematodes. The nematodes were applied to potted Litchi chinensis held in 19 l of an oxisol from Puerto Rico.

i0015-4040-91-1-75-t01.gif
David A. Jenkins, David Shapiro-Ilan, and Ricardo Goenaga "Efficacy of Entomopathogenic Nematodes Versus Diaprepes abbreviatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) Larvae in a High Clay-Content Oxisol Soil: Greenhouse Trials With Potted Litchi chinensis," Florida Entomologist 91(1), 75-78, (1 March 2008). https://doi.org/10.1653/0015-4040(2008)091[0075:EOENVD]2.0.CO;2
Published: 1 March 2008
JOURNAL ARTICLE
4 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top