Translator Disclaimer
1 March 2008 Aggregation of Calopteron discrepans (Coleoptera: Lycidae) Larvae Prior to Pupation
Author Affiliations +

Adult net-winged beetles of the genus Calopteron (Coleoptera: Lycidae) are aposematic models for a variety of beetle and moth mimics (Eisner et al. 2005). Calopteron larvae are reported to live in rotten logs, under loose bark or, less commonly, in soil or leaf litter. Lycid larvae are reported to be predacious by some authors (Miller 1988; Triplehorn & Johnson 2005) while other authors (Lawrence 1991; Marshall 2006; McCabe & Johnson 1979; Withycombe 1926) report that they feed on myxomycetes, fungi, or fermenting plant juices.

Last instar Calopteron terminale (F.), Calopteron reticulatum (F.) and Calopteron tropicum (L.) (as C. fasciatum F. [Withycombe 1926; Bocak & Matsuda 2003]) larvae are reported to form aggregations for pupation (McCabe & Johnson 1979; Moffat 1883; Withycombe 1926). Miller (1988) observed aggression between 2 early instars of C. reticulatum in the laboratory and concluded that either the aggressive tendencies are inhibited in last instars or that this species does not aggregate prior to pupation.

There are 3 species of Calopteron in North America north of Mexico. Two of these, Calopteron discrepans (Newman) and C. reticulatum, are nearly identical in appearance (and both are somewhat variable), being differentiated primarily on the basis of the color of the metasternum and second antennal segment (Dillon & Dillon 1961; Green 1952).

On Jan 15, 2007 two large aggregations (626 and 222 individuals, respectively) of C. discrepans pupae were observed on the trunks of saplings and a young tree in a floodplain forest in Alachua County, Florida. The forest canopy was dominated by southern live oaks, Quercus virginiana Mill. and sweet gums, Liquidambar styraciflua L., and the soil was covered with a thick layer of leaf litter. There were decaying logs in the area but not in close proximity to the pupal aggregations. Some adults had already emerged and were resting on surrounding vegetation when the aggregations were discovered. The aggregations were not removed from the field, though they were visited several times in order to document activity. Emergence continued until almost all individuals had emerged by mid-Feb.

The 2 aggregations were approximately 10 m apart, and pupae in each aggregation were partitioned between the trunks of 2 plants with the trunks less than 30 cm apart in each case. The aggregations began slightly above ground level and extended to a height of 80 cm. There were separated clumps of pupae within the main aggregations on 2 of the plants. Other saplings in the area contained no pupae. All 4 of the plants on which the pupae occurred were of different species (and in different families). Therefore, it is doubtful that the aggregating larvae were oriented toward a chemical cue from the plants. Earlier instars of Calopteron species are not known to be gregarious. Possibly an aggregation pheromone is involved.

Calopteron reticulatum adults contain pyrazines that likely impart the repugnant scent of the beetles and lycidic acid and other fatty acids that may render them distasteful to predators (Eisner et al. 2005). The integument of Calopteron larvae also displays bright, contrasting coloration and the larvae are likely distasteful. Pupation occurs within the last instar larval exuviae (Young & Fischer 1972). Pupae in the aggregations were shingled in tight masses (Fig. 1). The exuviae, which retain the larval coloration pattern (Fig. 2), likely provide not only shelter but aposematic benefit to the pupae. Aggregation of aposematic insects is generally believed to be adaptive as a defensive mechanism against predators (Riipi et al. 2001; Vulinec 1990), and that is likely the benefit of pupal aggregations of Calopteron. It also should be mentioned however, that similar, though smaller aggregations of cryptically colored larvae are known to occur in other lycid species.

Although a few mating pairs were observed near the aggregations, mating was never observed on the aggregated mass of pupae nor was there obvious evidence of pupal attendance by males. In fact, most of the resting adults on surrounding vegetation were not in copula. Male-female pairing is unlikely to be a major function of the pupal aggregations.

Voucher specimens of adults that emerged from these aggregations have been deposited in the Florida Collection of Arthropods, Division of Plant Industries, Gainesville, FL.

Summary

Pupal aggregation of Calopteron discrepans (Newman) is reported for the first time. Aggregation of the pupae cloaked in the brightly colored larval exuviae is believed to serve as a defensive mechanism against predators.

References Cited

  1. L. Bocak and K. Matsuda . 2003. Review of the immature stages of the family Lycidae (Insecta: Coleoptera). Jour. Nat. Hist 37:1463–1507. Google Scholar

  2. E. A. Dillon and L. S. Dillon . 1961. A Manual of Common Beetles of Eastern North America. Row, Peterson and Company, Evanston, IL. 884 pp. Google Scholar

  3. T. Eisner, M. Eisner, and M. Siegler . 2005. Secret Weapons: Defenses of Insects, Spiders, Scorpions, and Other Many-Legged Creatures. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. 384 pp.  Google Scholar

  4. J. W. Green 1952. The Lycidae of the United States and Canada. IV. The tribe Calopterini (Coleoptera). Trans. American Entomol. Soc. (Philadelphia) 78:1–19. Google Scholar

  5. J. F. Lawrence 1991. Lycidae (Cantharoidea). pp. 423-424 In F. W. Stehr [ed.], Immature Insects, Vol. 2. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, IA. 992 pp. Google Scholar

  6. S. A. Marshall 2006. Insects. Their Natural History and Diversity. Firefly Books, Buffalo, NY. 720 pp. Google Scholar

  7. T. L. McCabe and L. M. Johnson . 1979. Larva of Calopteron terminale (Say) with additional notes on adult behavior (Coleoptera: Lycidae). J. New York Entomol. Soc 87:283–288. Google Scholar

  8. R. S. Miller 1988. Behavior of Calopteron reticulatum (F.) larvae (Coleoptera: Lycidae). Ohio J. Sci 88:3119–120. Google Scholar

  9. J. A. Moffat 1883. Correspondence. Can. Entomol 15:179–180. Google Scholar

  10. M. Riipi, R. Alatolo, L. Lindstrom, and J. Mappes . 2001. Multiple benefits of gregariousness cover detectibility costs in aposematic aggregations. Nature (London) 413:6855512–514. Google Scholar

  11. C. A. Triplehorn and N. F. Johnson . 2005. Borror and DeLong’s Introduction to the Study of Insects. 7th ed. Thomson Brooks/Cole. Belmont, California. 864 pp. Google Scholar

  12. K. Vulinec 1990. Collective security: aggregation by insects as a defense. pp. 251-288 In D. L. Evans and J. O. Schmidt [eds.], Insect Defenses: Adaptive Mechanisms and Strategies of Prey and Predators. State University of New York Press. Albany, New York. 482 pp. Google Scholar

  13. C. L. Withycombe 1926. The biology of lycid beetles in Trinidad. Proc. Entomol. Soc. London 1:32–33. Google Scholar

  14. D. K. Young and R. L. Fischer . 1972. The pupation of Calopteron terminale (Say) (Coleoptera: Lycidae). Coleopt. Bull 26:117–18. Google Scholar

Appendices

Fig. 1.

Aggregation of Calopteron discrepans (Newman) pupae.

i0015-4040-91-1-124-f01.gif

Fig. 2.

Calopteron discrepans (Newman) pupa within last instar exuviae.

i0015-4040-91-1-124-f02.gif
Donald W. Hall and Marc A. Branham "Aggregation of Calopteron discrepans (Coleoptera: Lycidae) Larvae Prior to Pupation," Florida Entomologist 91(1), 124-125, (1 March 2008). https://doi.org/10.1653/0015-4040(2008)091[0124:AOCDCL]2.0.CO;2
Published: 1 March 2008
JOURNAL ARTICLE
2 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top