Translator Disclaimer
1 September 2012 Molecular Characterization of the cDNA Encoding Ecdysone Receptor Isoform B1 and Its Expression in the Oriental Fruit Fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae)
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The 20-hydroxyecdysone (20E) plays a critical role in a series of biological processes, via the ecdysone receptor/USP heterodimeric complex in arthropod. In order to clarify the regulatory mechanism of 20E, we characterized a full-length cDNA encoding a putative ecdysone receptor isoform B1 and named it as BdEcR-B1 in the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis. The BdEcR-B1 gene was 3,111 bp long, with an open reading frame of 2,304 bp, which encoded 767 amino acids with a predicated molecular weight of 83.3 kDa and an isoelectric point of 6.74. Alignment analysis revealed that the deduced protein sequence had 80% identity to EcR-B1 isoforms of various dipteran species, indicating that this gene was highly conserved during the evolution of the Diptera. Phylogenetic analysis suggested that BdEcR-B1 was orthologous to the EcR-B1 proteins identified in other insect species. Quantitative real-time PCR showed that BdEcR-B1 was expressed at all tested developmental stages, and the expression of BdEcR-B1 reached a significantly higher level just prior to the larval-pupa molt stage and in 4-d old pupa than those in other stages. Moreover, the BdEcR-B1 gene much more strongly expressed in gut and Malpighian tubule than those in the trachea and fat body, which suggests that this gene may be involved in tissue-specific function during larval development.

As the most active form of ecdysteroids in insects, 20-hydroxyecdysone (20E) plays a critical role in a series of biological processes during the whole life cycle, such as metamorphosis, development and reproduction (Henrich et al. 1998). The effect of 20E is transduced through a heterodimeric complex of 2 nuclear receptors, the ecdysone receptor (EcR) and ultraspiracle protein (USP) (Yao et al. 1992; Yao et al. 1993). The receptors directly initialize the expression of ecdysoneresponse gene cascades, which ultimately affect cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis on an organism-wide scale (Riddiford et al. 2000; Schwedes et al. 2011).

In Drosophila melanogaster, three EcR isoforms were identified: EcR-A, EcR-B1, EcR-B2, according to different promoters and splicing patterns (Talbot et al. 1993). All these isoforms share an identical C-terminal region, which include a highly conserved DNA binding domain (DBD) and a structurally conserved ligand binding domain (LBD). However, they have isoform-specific regions in the N-terminal, which is indicative of alternative splicing (Hu et al. 2003; Bain et al. 2007). It has been shown that different isoforms have different tissue-specific and developmentspecific expression patterns (Bender et al. 1997). Unlike EcR-A, which is highly expressed in adult stage, the EcR-B isoform, which participates in tissue remodeling in the larval stage, is highly expressed in larval-specific tissue, and mutations or RNAi against EcR-B will cause obvious defects in larval metamorphosis, such as arrested development and pupation failure (Bender et al. 1997; Schubiger et al. 1998; Tan & Palli 2008).

The oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel), is one of the most important pests of the horticultural industry in Asian and Pacific countries, because its larvae are frugivorous on more than 250 plant species including citrus and mango. Fruit infestation by fruit fly larvae causes direct fruit damage, fruit drop and export barriers in international trade through quarantine restrictions, all of which result in serious economic loses (Chen 2006; Stephens 2007). Having high mobility and fecundity as well as being very polyphagous, the oriental fruit fly is a dreaded invasive species and a major quarantine target (Clarke et al. 2005). Because of the economic importance of B. dorsalis and its development of resistance to insecticides, it is urgent to open new potential avenues for control. Here, we report the cloning and characterization of this insect's EcR-B1 cDNA and its expression patterns in different developmental stages and in the tissues of larvae using quantitative real-time PCR with indications that it provides a potential molecular target for controlling this pest.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Insects

Specimens of B. dorsalis were originally obtained in Fujian Province, People's Republic of China. The adult colony was reared at 27 ± 1 °C, 70 ± 5% RH, and 14:10 h L:D. Adults were fed an artificial diet, which on the basis of weight consisted of water, yeast, honey, and Vitamin C in the ratio: 500: 15:15:1. Eggs were placed for larval eclosion onto an artificial larval diet, which on the basis of weight consisted of corn flour, agar, wheat-germ flour, yeast, sugar, nipagin, sorbic acid, Vitamin C, and linolenic acid in the ratio: 600: 60: 250: 200: 200: 14: 7: 10: 1. This diet was poured into Petri dishes, allowed to cool, and then eggs from the adult colony were placed for hatching onto the surface of the cooled diet, and the larvae developed on it. Each petri dish was placed into a pot filled with sand until the larvae had pupated. After pupation, pupae were sieved out, placed into plastic cups and covered with sand. The plastic cups were placed in a cage to collect adults.

One-, 3-, 5-, and 7-d old larvae, 1-, 4-, 7-, and 10-d old pupae, and newly emerged female adults were chosen and stored at -80 °C until use. The fat body, gut, Malpighian tubule and trachea from the 7-d old larvae were dissected in 0.75% NaCl and immediately used for RNA isolation.

RNA Isolation and cDNA Synthesis

Total RNA was extracted from larvae using RNeasy® Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The total RNA was dissolved in 40 µL DEPCtreated water. The purity and quality of the RNA were tested by the ratio of OD260/OD280 and electrophoresis. High quality RNA was stored at -80 ° C. Two µg of RNA was used to synthesis cDNA by means of the PrimeScript® 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) with oligo (dT)18 primer and by means of the SMARTer™ RACE cDNA Amplification Kit (Clontech, California, USA), respectively. All reaction conditions were as stipulated by the manufacturer's instructions, and the synthesized cDNA was kept at -20 ° C for future use.

Obtaining Full-Length BdEcR-B1 and Validation of Opening Reading Frame (ORF)

Based on the transcriptome data of B. dorsalis, 2 pairs of gene-specific primers were designed to obtain the fragments of BdEcR-B1 (Shen et al. 2011). Gene-specific primers EcR-F/R1 and EcRF/R2 (Table 1) were designed to amplify 2 cDNA fragments (nucleotide 150 F- 851 F and 1094 F1621 F), and to generate 702 bp and 528 bp fragments, respectively.

The missing part was amplified using genespecific primers EcR-3R1, EcR-3R2 (Table 1) and RACE (Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends) technology were applied to obtain 3′-RACE of BdEcR-B1. In the first round reaction, 3′-RACE was performed by using 1 µL of 3′-RACE -ready-cDNA with Universal Primer Mix (UPM, Clontech) and EcR-3R1. Then nested PCR was conducted with the Nested Universal Primer (NUP, Clontech) and EcR-3R2.

PCR amplifications were carried out in a total volume of 25 µL, containing 15 µL ddH2O, 2.5 pL 10 × PCR Buffer (Mg2+ free), 2.5 µL Mg2+ (2.5 mM), 2 µL dNTP (2.5 mM), 1 µL, each primer (10 mM), 1 µL cDNA, and 0.25 µL rTaq™ polymerase (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). PCRs were conducted by the following thermal cycles: 3 min initial denaturation at 95 °C, followed by 34 cycles of 30 s at 95 °C, 30 s annealing at 58 °C, 1.5 min extension at 72 °C, with a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min.

TABLE 1.

SEQUENCE OF ALL PRIMERS USED IN THE STUDY OF ECDYSONE RECEPTOR ISOFORM B1 IN BACTROCERA DORSALIS.

t01_650.gif

The PCR products were analyzed on 1.0% agarose gel and stained with GoodView™ (SBS Genetech, Beijing, China). The target band of cDNAs were excised and recovered with the Gel Extraction Mini Kit (Watson Biotechnologies, Shanghai, China).

The purified cDNA fragments were cloned into pGEM®-T Easy vector (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin, USA). The ligation reactions were transformed into DH5α competent cells (Transgen, Beijing, China). Successful clones were picked out by standard ampicillin selection and PCR with gene-specific primers used before, and further sequenced in both directions with an ABI Model 3100 automated sequencer (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Shanghai, China).

DNAMAN 5.2.2 (Lynnon, BioSoft, Quebec, Canada) was applied to assemble the putative full-length of BdEcR-B1. To verify the full-length of cDNA, the primers EcR-FL-F and EcR-FL-R (Table 1) were designed to amplify the ORF of BdEcR-B1, which contained partial 5′ and 3′UTR. The PCR products were purified, cloned, and sequenced as described above.

Sequence Analysis

The full-length of the amino acid of BdEcR-B1 was compared with other EcR sequences by means of the “BLAST-P” tool at NCBI website ( http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). The sequence was edited with DNAMAN 5.2.2. SUMOylation motifs were predicted by SUMOsp 2.0.4 ( http://sumosp.biocuckoo.org/). The Neighbor-Joining method was carried out to construct a phylogenetic tree with 1000 replications as the bootstrap value by MEGA 5.04.

RT-qPCR Analysis

Developmental and tissue expression patterns of BdEcR-B1 mRNA were assessed by RT-qPCR. Total RNA was isolated from different tissues (fat body, gut, Malpighian tubule and trachea of the third instar larvae), 1- and 4-d larvae, using RNeasy® Plus Micro Kit with gDNA Eliminator spin column (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Total RNA for 7-d larvae, pupae and adults was extracted using TRzol (Biomed, Beijing, China), and then treated with RQ1 DNase (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). First-strand cDNAs were synthesized by PrimeScript® RT reagent Kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). RT-qPCR was conducted using SYBR Green detection system (iQ™ SYBR® Green Supermix, BOI-RAD, Hercules, California, USA) with Mx3000P thermal cycler (Stratagene, La Jolla, California, USA) and gene-specific primers EcR-Q-F and EcR-QR. The PCR amplifications were performed in a total volume of 20 µL, including 10 µL SYBR Green Mix, 7 µL ddH2O, 1 µL of each primer (10 mM) and 1 µL of template cDNA, following the common cycles: pre-incubation at 95 °C for 2 min, 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 15 s, annealing at 60 °C for 30 s, elongation at 72 °C for 30 s. After reaction, a melting curve analysis from 60 °C to 95 °C was applied to all reactions to ensure consistency and specificity of the amplified product. The α-tubulin gene was used as reference gene (GenBank accession number: GU269902) (Table 1), and the data was calculated using ΔΔCt method (Pfaffl 2001). All reactions were replicated 3 times.

Furthermore, the data of developmental expression and tissue-specific expression patterns were subjected an analysis of variance (ANOVA) (SPSS 12.0 for Windows) with the use of the LSD test to separate significantly different means.

RESULTS

Sequence Analysis of BdEcR-B1 cDNA

The BdEcR-B1 cDNA (GenBank accession number: JQ034623) was obtained by PCR. The full-length cDNA of BdEcR-B1 contains 3,111 nucleotides, including 192 bp of 5′-UTR and 615 bp of 3′-UTR. The 2,304 bp open reading frame (ORF) encoded a protein of 767 amino acids with a predicted molecular weight of 83.3 kDa and an isoelectric point of 6.74. The putative polyadenylation signal “AATAAA” motif was detected in the 3′-UTR.

The polypeptide exhibited 5 domains (A/B, C, D, E, F), which were characteristic of a member of the nuclear receptor (Fig. 1). In the A/B domain, BdEcR-B1 contained a highly conserved (K/R) RRW (K3-W6) motif, which belonged to the EcR-B1 isoform. In addition, several B1 isoform specific regions were found in the N-terminus, such as the S-rich (E18-S28), which consisted of acidic residues, the SP residues (S38-P39), and the modified DL-rich motif (V45-D55), which was composed of repeats of several bulky hydrophobic residues and acidic residues. Two zinc finger motifs (E240-V315) were found in the C domain. Furthermore, an “EGCKG” (P-box, E260-G264) and a “KFGRS” (D-box, K289-S283) were identified in C domain. Two heptapetide sequences, the potential nuclear location signal (NLS), “MKRREKK” (M320-K326) and “QKEKEKQ” (Q328-Q324) were found in the D hinge domain. SUMOylation sites were predicted by SUMOsp 2.0.4. The result indicated that the protein has 4 potential SUMOylation sites (ΨKxE, where Ψ indicates one or more large hydrophobic amino acids) at positions 326, 709, 729 and 750.

Phylogenetic Analysis

A phylogenetic analysis was conducted to clarify the relationships of BdEcR-B1 with other homologs from GenBank. Neighbor-joining algorithm analysis yielded that the BdEcR-B1 was most closely related to Ceratitis capitata EcR (CAA11907) (Fig. 2). Dipteran EcRs were clustered separately from the EcRs of insects in other Orders. In addition, BLAST-P analyses in the NCBI database showed that the deduced amino acid sequence of BdEcR-B1 shared 86% identity with C. capitata EcR (CAA11907), 83% identity with Drosophila sechellia (XP002043398), and 83% identity with Drosophila yukuba (XP001961340).

Expression Patterns of BdEcR-B1

To clarify the expression pattern of BdEcR-B1 gene in various developmental stages and tissues, RT-qPCR was performed. The results showed that transcripts of BdEcR-B1 were detected from the first day of larval to the newly emerged female adult (Fig. 3). Significantly higher expression of BdEcR-B1 gene appeared on the last day of larval stage and on the fourth day of the pupa stage (LSD test, P < 0.05). During the larval stage, the expression level of BdEcR-B1 appeared to increase progressively with each successive instar. However, there was no significant difference in the expression levels of BdEcR-B1 among the 1-d to 5-d old larvae, 1-d, 7-d, 10-d old pupae and the adult (Fig. 3).

The relative expression patterns of BdEcR-B1 in different tissues were shown in Fig. 4. BdEcR-B1 transcripts were observed in all tissues analyzed in this research. The expression levels of BdEcR-B1 in the gut and the Malpighian tubule greatly exceeded those in the trachea and fat body. Further, the expression of these transcripts in the trachea was significantly higher than in the fat body (LSD test, P < 0.05).

DISCUSSION

Physiological processes and development are coordinated by means of endocrine regulation mechanisms in response to internal and environment signals. Plasticity in endocrine regulation enables organisms to survive, thrive and reproduce while encountering environment changes (Gáliková et al. 2011). In insects, the ecdysone titer tightly coordinates physiological changes throughout the whole life cycle by transducing signals to target genes via the edysone receptor proteins (EcRs) and the Ultraspiracle protein (USP) (Yao et al. 1992; Thomas et al. 1993; Cruz, 2006). The EcRs in the 3 isoforms (EcR-A, EcRB1, and EcR-B2), are produced under the control of the EcR gene by using 2 different promoters and alternative splicing (Talbot et al. 1993). In D. melanogaster, isoform EcR-A acts as a weak activator and strong repressor, while isoform EcR-B acts either as a weak repressor or a strong activator (Hu et al. 2003). In this study, we cloned and characterized BdEcR-B1 cDNA from the oriental fruit fly. Sequence analysis showed that the BdEcR-B1 contains an open reading frame of 767 amino acid sequences with a predicted molecular weight of 83.3 kDa and a pI of 6.74. Like Aedes aegypti, C. capitata and Lucilia cuprina, the BdEcR-B1 exhibits typical domain structure (A/B, C, D, E, F domain) of the nuclear receptor family and belongs to the hormone receptor family with a double methionine in the initial position of the protein sequence (Cho et al. 1995; Hannan & Hill. 1997; Verras et al. 1999).

EcR isoforms have been identified in more than 51 species of insects and other arthropods, such as L. cuprina, Tribolium castaneum, Choristoneura fumiferana, and Spodoptera litura. EcR isoforms have common C/D, E and F domains, yet they have different N-terminal regions (Verras et al. 1999; Nakagawa & Henrich 2009; Hwang et al. 2010; Watanabe et al. 2010). In the C domain (DNA binding domain, DBD), there are two C4 zinc finger modules, which show sequence-specific DNA binding activity. In the E domain (ligand binding domain, LBD), there are some motifs for specific ligand binding, dimerization and transactivation. Another transactivation site is located in the A/B domain of the amino acid sequence. Comparison of BdEcR-B1 A/B domain to the corresponding sites of the B1 isoforms of other Dipteran species, revealed that BdEcR-B1 displays a highly conserved isoform-specific B1 microdomain, including the (KZR)RRW motif, the S-rich motif, the DL-rich motif, the SP residues and a modified EESS(T/S)EV(V/T)SS motif. The S-rich and DL-rich conserved motifs in the EcR-B1 iso- forms are structurally and functionally independent of each other, but they interact with essential co-regulatory proteins and play an important role in transcriptional regulation; and they have the similar functions in these species (Watanabe et al. 2010).

Fig. 1.

The complete cDNA sequence and deduced amino acid sequence of B. dorsalis ecdysone receptor (EcR) B1 gene (GenBank accession number: JQ034623). The 5′-UTR and 3′-UTR are lowercase. The start codon is indicated with bold and the stop codon is indicated with bold and asterisk. In the A/B domain, the (K/R) RRW motif is light shaded. The EcR-B1 isoform-specific regions: the S-rich motif, the SP-residues and the DL-rich motif are indicated with dotted line, wavy line and dark shaded, respectively. The zinc finger motifs are underlined and four cysteine residues are marked with asterisk. Both of the hepapeptide sequences are boxed. Four SUMOylation sites are double lined. The putative polyadenylation signal “AATAAA” in 3 -UTR is underlined.

f01_650.jpg

Fig. 2.

Phylogenetic tree based on the deduced amino acid sequence comparison of homologous EcR isoforms genes from various orders of insect. The topology was tested by bootstrap analysis with 1000 replicates. The numbers above the branch indicated bootstrap percentages.

f02_650.jpg

Amino acid sequence alignments were utilized to construct a phylogenic tree with BdEcR-B1 and 8 other insect EcRs. The data indicate that BdEcR-B1 conforms to the taxonomic analysis of various insects, and it shows high similarity to the other dipteran EcRs, which form a single cluster. In contrast, BdEcR-B1 shows much less similarity to the EcRs of species belonging to the Coleoptera, Homoptera, Hemiptera, Lepidoptera, Hymenoptera and Blattaria.

As a potential molecular target of ecdysone, the regulation mechanism of EcR isoforms in arthropod development have been well studied by mutational analysis in D. melanogaster, S. exigua, Tigrious japonicus, Nilaparvata lugens, Laodelphgax striatellus, and Sogatella furcifera. This analysis shows that some mutations result in the arrest of ecdysone-responses during metamorphosis (e.g., larval molting) and tissue remodeling (Hwang et al. 2010; Lam & Thummel. 2000; Schubiger et al. 1998; Verras et al. 1999; Wu et al. 2012; Yao et al. 2010). In insects, increased 20E levels can induce the expression of genes, which is essential for the synthesis of the new cuticle and the production of ecdysis-triggering hormone receptors preparatory to molting. The situation in B. dorsalis is similar to that in C. capitata, in which significantly high levels of CcEcR-B1 are found in late third instar larvae and in the middle of the pre-pupal stage, and these levels are higher than in earlier larval stages, or in the pupal stages or in the adult (Verras et al. 1999). In the water flea, Daphnia magna Strauss, the EcR-B expression is up-regulated more than 20-fold relative to initial the molt (Kato et al. 2007). A similar expression pattern occurs in D. melanogaster in which EcRB isoforms are highly expressed in the second and third instar larvae. The larvae with EcR-B mutants fail to molt with a newly duplicated cuticle. Interestingly, EcR over-expression during some sensitive stages also caused developmental arrest and lethality in Drosophila (Schubiger et al. 2003). Relatively high expressions of BdEcR-B1 gene occur in B. dorsalis just prior to the last larval instar to pupal molt and again during the mid-pupal stage. This suggests that these 2 critical times in metamorphosis, which might be vulnerable to interventions in the regulation of the ecdysone-mediated signal transduction via an increased EcR expression strategy. All the results indicate that normal levels of BdEcR-B1 in different developmental stages are crucial to ensure normal metamorphosis in B. dorsalis.

Fig. 3.

Expression patterns of the BdEcR-B1 in different developmental stages of S. dorsalis (bar graph represented Mean ± SE; different letters above each bar indicated the significant difference, P < 0.05, LSD in ANOVA). L and P represent larval and pupa, respectively.

f03_650.jpg

Fig. 4.

Expression patterns of the BdEcR-B1 in different tissues of larval B. dorsalis (bar graph represented Mean ± SE; different letters above each bar indicate significant difference, P < 0.05, LSD in ANOVA). FB, GUT, MT, and TR represent fat body, gut, Malpighian tubule, and trachea, respectively.

f04_650.jpg

EcR proteins are extensively expressed in different tissues, but those 3 isoforms are each expressed in a tissue- or cell-specific manner. Unlike EcR-A isoform, which predominately expresses in proliferative tissues, the EcR-B isoforms are expressed in larval-specific tissues that are dependent on 20E-triggered larvalspecific remodeling (Schubiger et al. 1998; Cruz et al. 2006). In holometabolous insects, midgut remodeling is important during metamorphosis, especially in mosquitoes; and EcR-B has been indicated to play an essential role in both histolysis of larval tissue and differentiation of imaginai diploid cells (Parthasarathy & Palli 2007). The EcR-B1 of Chilo suppressalis is expressed more highly in the midgut than either in the fat body or in the epidermis, which indicates that EcR-B1 may play an important role in remodeling (Minakuchi et al. 2002). At the onset of the larval-pupal molt in Bombyx mori, the EcR-B1 gene is significantly expressed in larval tissue, like fat body, epidermis, and salivary glands, and especially in wing discs in the last larval instar. This gene is also involved in programmed cell death in the anterior silk gland (Jindra & Riddford 1996; Goncu & Parlak 2009). Besides, EcR genes participate in the chitin biosynthesis pathway, which is the major polysaccharide layer in the trachea, muscle, cuticle and peritrophic matrix (Yao et al. 2010). In this study, we found that during the last larval stadium, the mRNA transcript of BdEcR-B1 is regulated in a tissuespecific manner in that relatively high amounts of mRNA are found in the gut and Malpighian tubule, and this indicates that the BdEcR-B1 is expressed in a tissue-specific manner, i.e., that the gut and the Malpighian tubule are the main expressing tissues, and that BdEcR-B1 may be essential in tissue remodeling.

In conclusion, we cloned and characterized the cDNA of ecdysone receptor isform B1 in the oriental fruit fly, and elucidated its temporal and tissue-specific expression pattern. Our present work suggests that BdEcR-B1 plays an essential role in larval molting and tissue remodeling. However, our data do not cover the details of other isoforms, nor elucidate its relationship to the USP throughout the whole life cycle. Further investigations will be focused on the EcR/USP relationship and the ecdysone-triggered gene cascade.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported in part by the National Basic Research Program of China (2009CB125903), Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing (CSTC, 2009BA1042, JJA80020), the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (IRT0976), the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (20100182120022), and the Earmarked Fund for Modern Agro-industry (Citrus) Technology Research System of China.

REFERENCES CITED

1.

D. L. Bain , A. F. Heneghan , K. D. Connaghan-Jones , and M. T. Miura 2007. Nuclear receptor structure: implications for function. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 69: 201–220. Google Scholar

2.

M. Bender , F. B. Imam , W. S. Talbot , B. Ganetzky , and D. S. Hogness 1997. Drosophila ecdysone receptor mutations reveal functional differences among receptor isoforms. Cell 91: 777–788. Google Scholar

3.

P. Chen , and H. Ye 2006. Population dynamics of Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) and analysis of factors influencing populations in Baoshanba, Yunnan, China. Entomol. Sci. 10: 141– 147. Google Scholar

4.

W. L. Cho , M. Z. Kapitskaya , and A. S. Raikhel 1995. Mosquito ecdysteroid receptor: Analysis of the cDNA and expression during vitellogenesis. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 25: 19–27. Google Scholar

5.

A. R. Clarke , K. F. Armstrong , A. E. Carmichael , J. R. Milne , S. Raghu , G. K. Roderick , and D. K. Yeates 2005. Invasive phytophagous pests arising through a recent tropical evolutionary radiation: the Bactrocera dorsalis complex of fruit flies. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 50: 293–319. Google Scholar

6.

J. Cruz , D. Mané-Padrós , X. Bellés , and D. Martín 2006. Functions of the ecdysone receptor isoformA in the hemimetabolous insect Blattella germanica revealed by systemic RNAi in vivo. Dev. Biol. 297: 158–171. Google Scholar

7.

H. Fujiwara , M. Jindra , R. Newitt , S. R. Palli , K. Hiruma , and L. M. Riddiford 1995. Cloning of an ecdysone receptor homolog from Manduca sexta and the developmental profile of its mRNA in wings. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 25: 845–856. Google Scholar

8.

E. Goncu , and O. Parlak 2009. Morphological changes and patterns of ecdysone receptor B1 immunolocalization in the anterior silk gland undergoing programmed cell death in the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Acta Histochem. 111: 25–34. Google Scholar

9.

G. N. Hannan , and R. J. Hill 1997. Cloning and characterization of LcEcR: A functional ecdysone receptor from the sheep blowfly Lucilia cuprina. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 27: 479–488. Google Scholar

10.

V. C. Henrich , R. Rybczynski , and L. I. Gilbert 1998. Peptide Hormones, Steroid Hormones, and Puffs: Mechanisms and Models in Insect Development, pp. 73–125 In L. Gerald [ed.] Vitamins & Hormones. Academic Press N. Y. Google Scholar

11.

X. Hu , L. Cherbas , and P. Cherbas 2003. Transcription activation by the ecdysone receptor (EcR/USP): identification of activation functions. Mol. Endocrinol. 17: 716–731. Google Scholar

12.

D. S. Hwang , J. S. Lee , K. W. Lee , J. S. Rhee , J. Han , J. Lee , G. S. Park , and Y. M. Lee 2010. Cloning and expression of ecdysone receptor (EcR) from the intertidal copepod, Tigriopus japonicus. Comp. Biochem. Phys. C: Toxicol. Pharmacol. 151: 303–312. Google Scholar

13.

M. Jindra , and L. M. Iddiford 1996. Expression of ecdysteroid-regulated transcripts in the silk gland of the wax moth, Galleria mellonella. Dev. Genes. Evol. 206: 305–314. Google Scholar

14.

M. Kamimura , S. Tomita , and H. Fujiwara 1996. Molecular cloning of an ecdysone receptor (B1 isoform) homologue from the silkworm, Bombyx mori, and its mRNA expression during wing disc development. Comp. Biochem. Phys. B: Biochem. Mol. Biol. 113: 341–347. Google Scholar

15.

Y. Kato , K. Kobayashi , S. Oda , N. Tatarazako , H. WataNabe , T. Iguchi 2007. Cloning and characterization of the ecdysone receptor and ultraspiracle protein from the water flea Daphnia magna. J. Endocrinol. 193: 183. Google Scholar

16.

G. Lam , and C. S. Thummel 2000. Inducible expression of double-stranded RNA directs specific genetic interference in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 10: 957–963. Google Scholar

17.

G. Martina , K. Peter , S. Gabriele , and F. Thomas 2011. Steroid hormone regulation of C. elegans and Drosophila aging and life history. Exp. Gerontol. 46: 141–147. Google Scholar

18.

C. Minakuchi , Y. Nakagawa , M. Kiuchi , S. Tomita , and M. Kamimura 2002. Molecular cloning, expression analysis and functional confirmation of two ecdysone receptor isoforms from the rice stem borer Chilo suppressalis. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 32: 999–1008. Google Scholar

19.

Y. Nakagawa , and V. C. Henrich 2009. Arthropod nuclear receptors and their role in molting. FEBS J. 276: 6128–6157. Google Scholar

20.

R. Parthasarathy , and S. R. Palli 2007. Stage- and cell-specific expression of ecdysone receptors and ecdysone-induced transcription factors during midgut remodeling in the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti. J. Insect Physiol. 53: 216–229. Google Scholar

21.

M. W. Pfaffl 2001. A new mathematical model for relative quantification real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 29: 2002–2007. Google Scholar

22.

L. M. Riddiford , P. Cherbas , and J. W. Truman 2000. Ecdysone receptors and their biological actions. Vitam. Horm. 60: 1–73. Google Scholar

23.

M. Schubiger , S. Tomita , C. Sung , S. Robinow , and J. W. Truman 2003. Isoform specific control of gene activity in vivo by the Drosophila ecdysone receptor. Mech. Dev. 120: 909–918. Google Scholar

24.

M. Schubiger , A. Wade , G. Carney , J. Truman , and M. Bender 1998. Drosophila EcR-B ecdysone receptor isoforms are required for larval molting and for neuron remodeling during metamorphosis. Development 125: 2053–2062. Google Scholar

25.

C. Schwedes , S. Tulsiani , and G. Carney 2011. Ecdysone receptor expression and activity in adult Drosophila melanogaster. J Insect Physiol. 57: 899–907. Google Scholar

26.

G. M. Shen , W. Dou , J. Z. Niu , H. B. Jiang , W. J. Yang , F. X. Jia , F. Hu , L. Cong , and J. J. Wang 2011. Transcriptome Analysis of the Oriental Fruit Fly (Bactrocera dorsalis). PLoS One 6: e29127. Google Scholar

27.

A. Stephens , D. Kriticos , A. L and Eriche 2007. The current and future potential geographical distribution of the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae). Bull. Entomol. Res. 97: 369–378. Google Scholar

28.

A. A. Sullivan , and C. S. Thummel 2003. Temporal profiles of nuclear receptor gene expression reveal coordinate transcriptional responses during Drosophila development. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 17: 2125–2137. Google Scholar

29.

W. S. Talbot , E. A. Swyryd , and D. S. Hogness 1993. Drosophila tissues with different metamorphic responses to ecdysone express different ecdysone receptor isoforms. Cell 73: 1323–1337. Google Scholar

30.

A. J. Tan , and S. R. Palli 2008. Edysone receptor isoforms play distinct roles in controlling molting and metamorphosis in the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 291: 42–49. Google Scholar

31.

H. E. Thomas , Stunnenberg , and H. G. , A. F. Stewart 1993. Heterodimerization of the Drosophila ecdysone receptor with retinoid X receptor and ultraspiracle. Nature 362, 471–475. Google Scholar

32.

M. Verras , M. Mavroidis , G. Kokolakis , P. Gourzi , A. Zacharopoulou , and A. C. Mintzas 1999. Cloning and characterization of CcEcR. Eur. J. Biochem. 265: 798–808. Google Scholar

33.

T. Watanabe , H. Takeuchi , T. Kubo 2010. Structural diversity and evolution of the N-terminal isoformspecific region of ecdysone receptor-A and-B1 isoforms in insects. BMC Evol. Biol. 10: 40. Google Scholar

34.

W. J. Wu , Y. Wang , H. J. Huang , Y. Y. Bao , and C. X. Zhang 2012. Ecdysone receptor controls wing morphogenesis and melanization during rice planthopper metamorphosis. J. Insect Physiol. 58: 420–426. Google Scholar

35.

Q. Yao , D. Zhang , B. Tang , J. Chen , L. Lu , W. Zhang 2010. Identification of 20-Hydroxyecdysone lateresponse genes in the chitin biosynthesis pathway. PLoS One 5: e14058. Google Scholar

36.

T. P. Yao , B. M. Forman , Z. Jiang , L. Cherbas , J. D. Chen , M. McKeown , P. Cherbas , and R. M. Evans 1993. Functional ecdysone receptor is the product of EcR and Ultraspiracle genes. Nature 366: 476–479. Google Scholar

37.

T. P. Yao , W. A. Segraves , A. E. Oro , M. McKeown , and R. M. Evans 1992. Drosophila ultraspiracle modulates ecdysone receptor function via heterodimer formation. Cell 71: 63–72. Google Scholar
Lin Cong, Wen-Jia Yang, Guang-Mao Shen, Wei Dou, and Jin-Jun Wang "Molecular Characterization of the cDNA Encoding Ecdysone Receptor Isoform B1 and Its Expression in the Oriental Fruit Fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae)," Florida Entomologist 95(3), 650-658, (1 September 2012). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.095.0316
Published: 1 September 2012
JOURNAL ARTICLE
9 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top