Translator Disclaimer
1 September 2014 Genetic Evidence for Diversity of Spiralling Whitefly, Aleurodicus dispersus (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) Populations in India
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The spiralling whitefly Aleurodicus dispersus Russell (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), a highly polyphagous pest, has since about 2000 been an important pest of agricultural and horticultural crops in India. Despite its economic importance, little is known about the level and patterns of genetic variability in populations of the A. dispersus. In this study, we used the simple sequence repeats - polymerase chain reaction (SSR-PCR) technique was used to study the genetic diversity of A. dispersus in India. The present study is the first of its kind in India to utilize SSR markers for characterizing A. dispersus populations. A total of 356 different bands were scored using 18 primers for amplification. About 66.0% of alleles were polymorphic in A. dispersus populations. The SSR survey clearly detected moderate levels of polymorphism among the whitefly populations; multiple alleles were identified in many markers. The polymorphism information content (PIC) for SSR primers ranged from 0.0000 to 0.9541. Average genetic distances were estimated in our effort to investigate the level of DNA variation among the 7 geographic populations of A. dispersus from southern and northeastern India. The highest average genetic distance (0. 8182) was found between populations from Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh and Meghalaya and Mizoram. An UPGMA dendrogram based on similarity coefficients was constructed for the 7 populations analyzed. The A. dispersus population from Maharashtra was separated from those in the other 6 states viz., Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Mizoram and Meghalaya.

The spiralling whitefly, Aleurodicus dispersus Russell (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), is an insect pest of many tropical and sub-tropical crops. Aleurodicus dispersus, native to the Caribbean region of Central America (Russell 1965), is a highly polyphagous pest, which has an extensive host range covering 481 plant species belonging to 295 genera from 90 families of vegetables, fruits and ornamentals trees (Srinivasa 2000). In India, it was first recorded in 1993 at Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala on cassava (Palaniswami et al. 1995). Later it was reported from several parts of Kerala (David & Regu 1995; Ranjith et al. 1996), Tamil Nadu (David & Regu 1995), Karnataka (Mani et al. 2000), Andra Pradesh, Maharashtra (Charati et al. 2003), Orissa (CABI/EPPO 2006) and Mizoram (Boopathi 2008). The whitefly might have been introduced into India from neighboring countries like the Maldives (Muniappan 1996), Sri Lanka (Ranjith et al. 1996) and Myanmar (Boopathi 2008). Since 1993 the species has spread throughout the southern and northeastern India, thereafter it has become an important pest of agricultural and horticultural crops (Boopathi & Karuppuchamy 2013; Boopathi et al. 2013a). Direct feeding damage was caused by the piercing and sucking of sap from foliage by immature and adult stages of whiteflies (Boopathi et al. 2013b). When feeding, dense populations of this polyphagous pest caused premature leaf drops and produced ample honeydew which serves as a substrate for sooty mold growth, which led to the abandonment of cassava fields (Akinlosotu et al. 1993). Sooty mold blackens the leaf, decreases photosynthetic activity and decreases vigor often causing disfigurement of the host (Kumashiro et al. 1983; John et al. 2007). However, the colonization process and geographic source of the original population remain unknown. A molecular technique based on the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), the simple sequence repeats - polymerase chain reaction SSR-PCR, is being widely used in applied entomology (Harry et al. 1998). Many works have been done on the sweetpotato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), including genetic studies (Callejas et al. 2005), but very little on A. dispersus especially in India. Despite the economic importance of A. dispersus, little is known about the level and patterns of genetic variability in A. dispersus populations. Thus, in this project the SSR-PCR technique was used to obtain information on genetic variability of A. dispersus populations of India.

Materials and Methods

Insect Collections

Aleurodicus dispersus population was collected from 7 geographic regions of southern and northeastern States of India (Table 1). Aleurodicus dispersus adults were preserved in 70% ethanol until DNA extraction. Five adults from each population were analyzed to determine the genetic diversity of A. dispersus populations in India.

Isolation of DNA

The DNA was isolated by the CTAB (cetyl trimethylammonium bromide) method adopted from Gawel & Jarrett (1991) with necessary modifications. Prior to extraction, 1 adult female was taken into an autoclaved mortar containing 50 µL of pre-heated CTAB extraction buffer and the sample was ground using pestle. The samples were incubated at 65 °C for 45 min with CTAB extraction buffer. Equal volume of chloroform: isoamyl alcohol mixture (24: 1) was added and mixed by inversion for 15 min. The tubes were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 15 min. at 4 °C. The clear aqueous phase was transferred to a new sterile tube. One-third volume of ice cold isopropanol was added and mixed gently by inverting the tubes until DNA was precipitated out by incubating the tubes at -20 °C overnight. Then, it was centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 20 min. in 4 °C to pellet out the DNA. The DNA pellet was washed with 70% ethanol and dissolved in 20 µL of 1X TE buffer (pH 8.0). To eliminate the RNA and protein contamination from DNA, one-tenth volume of RNase (10 mg mL-1) and 1 µL of proteinase K (25 mg mL-1) was added to DNA sample and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min.

SSR - PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) Analysis

DNA samples from A. dispersus populations collected from 7 states of India were amplified using a set of 18 SSR primer pairs which included 7 SSR primers of A. dispersus (Ma et al. 2011) and 11 SSR primers of B. tabaci (De Barro et al. 2003; Tsagkarakou & Roditakis 2003; Gauthier et al. 2008) as detailed in Table 2. Preliminary studies were done using SSR primers of B. tabaci to know the genetic variation among the A. dispersus populations.

Polymerase chain reactions were performed in a thermocycler (BIORAD DNA engine, PTC-0200, Mexico). Eighteen different primers were used for amplification. Reactions were performed in a volume of 25.0 µL containing 16.5 µL of double distilled water, 2.5 µL of Tag buffer, 1.0 µL of dNTPS, 0.5 µL of MgCl2, 1.0 µL of forward primer, 1.0 µL of reverse primer, 0.5 µL of Tag DNA polymerase and 2.0 µL of the extracted Genomic DNA.

The reaction cycle comprised an initial 5.0 min of pre-denaturation at 95 °C, 40 cycles of amplification (1.0 min of denaturation at 95 °C; 1.0 min of annealing temperature ranging from 50.0 to 60.0 °C for different SSR primers as in Table 2; 1.0 min of extension at 72 °C), and 5.0 min of final extension at 72 °C. Followed the amplification, the samples were subjected to denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis as detailed below.

Table 1.

Aleurodicus dispersus dna samples collected from 7 geographic regions of southern and northeastern states of India.

t01_1115.gif

Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis

PCR products were run on 6% polyacrylamide gels, using a gel apparatus. The gel was pre-run for about 20 min. before loading the sample and maintained at 70 W for 2 h. After electrophoresis, the gel was separated from the plates and treated for 15 min in fixation solution (double distilled water and 0.5% v/v acetic acid) with gentle shaking, the gel was washed 2-times with distilled water for 2 min. The gel was stained in staining solution (0.1% w/v silver nitrate), the gel was washed 2 times with distilled water for 2 min, and then the gel was transferred to developing solution (1.5% w/v sodium hydroxide, 0.3% formaldehyde). The reactions were stopped by using stopper solution (double distilled water and 0.5% v/v acetic acid). The bands were then visualized by silver staining (Bassam et al. 1991; Chalhoub et al. 1997), dried overnight and photographed.

Statistical Analysis

Images were used to score the data for SSR analysis. Clearly resolved, unambiguous polymorphic bands were scored with the help of AlphaEase ® FC Software (Version 6.0). The scores were obtained in the form of a matrix with '1' and '0', which indicated the presence and absence of bands in each location, respectively. Allele scoring was done using the 100 bp marker lane as a reference. The sizes of the alleles are approximated by comparing with the band migration distance of the standard 100 bp ladder. The polymorphism information content (PIC) values are calculated for each SSR marker using the following algorithm. PIC = 1-Σ fi01_1115.gif i = 1 where fi01_1115.gif is the frequency of ith allele (Hildebrand et al. 1992).

Table 2.

SSR primers used for characterization of Aleurodicus dispersus populations collected from 7 geographic regions of southern and northeastern states of India.

t02_1115.gif

The data matrix was used to calculate Jaccard's similarity coefficient (Sneath & Sokal 1973) which does not consider the joint absence of a marker as an indication of similarity. A dendrogram was constructed by the Unweighted Pair-Group Method (UPGMA) (Sneath & Sokal 1973). The resulting matrix was used to calculate Manhattan distances between all pairs of populations. These analyses were performed using NTSYS-pc software, version 2.0 (Rohlf 1998).

Results

In the SSR analysis, all amplification products obtained were reproducible and consistent. The genetic variation among the seven A. dispersus populations collected from various geographic regions of India was investigated using SSR markers. Eighteen of the 45 primers screened produced clear bands on the SSR amplifications and were used for analysis. These primers amplified a total of 356 alleles (Table 3). The total number of alleles obtained from each primer ranged from 4 (AD26) to 79 (AY145458) with an average of 19.78 alleles per primer. Two hundred and thirty five (66.0%) out of 356 alleles were polymorphic for A. dispersus populations (13.06 polymorphic alleles per primer). Among 18 primers, 16 primers were polymorphic and the polymorphism ranged from 21.4 to 100%. The primers, Btls1-9, AY145464, AY183673, AY183675, AY183678, AY183679, AY183682, AD2, AD13, AD15, and AD26 were produced 100 % polymorphic patterns, while Btls1-14 and Btls1-13 produced monomorphic pattern. The polymorphism information content (PIC) for SSR primers ranged from 0.0000 to 0.9541. The PIC value was the highest in AD12 (0.9541), AY145458 (0.9492), and AD3 (0.9339). The size of amplification products from different primers ranged from 72 to 320 bp. An example of SSR amplification patterns of primer, AD3 is shown in Fig. 1 for different geographical regions of India.

Genetic relationships between populations are shown in Table 4. The average genetic distances were estimated to investigate the level of DNA variation among the 7 geographic populations of A. dispersus. The genetic distance varied from 0.6364 to 0.8182 among the 7 geographic populations of A. dispersus. The lowest average genetic distance was found between populations from Maharashtra and Karnataka (0.6364). The highest average genetic distance (0. 8182) was found between populations from Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh and Meghalaya and Mizoram.

An UPGMA dendrogram based on similarity coefficient was constructed for the 7 populations analyzed (Fig. 2). Three major clusters were evident. The first cluster contained A. dispersus populations from Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka. In the first cluster, Tamil Nadu population was separated from the other 3 states. The second cluster had populations from Mizoram and Meghalaya. The third cluster contained A. dispersus populations from Maharashtra which was separated from other 6 states of India. From cluster analysis is evident that Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu populations were distinct from each other.

Table 3.

Polymorphism information content (pic) of ssr markers in Aleurodicus dispersus populations of 7 geographic regions of southern and northeastern states of India.

t01_1115.gif

Fig. 1.

SSR profiles of the 7 Aleurodicus dispersus populations collected from southern and northeastern States of India. Abbreviations: TN: Tamil Nadu, AP: Andhra Pradesh, KA: Karnataka, MH: Mahashtra, MZ: Mizoram and ML: Meghalaya.

f01_1115.jpg

Discussion

Microsatellites (SSR markers) are short DNA fragments located throughout the genome, which contain tandemly repeated patterns of 2 to 6 basepairs. Because of their high polymorphism and co-dominance, these markers provide an effective tool of population genetic studies. SSR markers were isolated and utilized for studying genetic diversity in B. tabaci (De Barro et al. 2003; Tsagkarakou et al. 2007; Gauthier et al. 2008). SSR markers have been used to differentiate B. tabaci variants and to estimate the biotypes and genetic relationships of closely related populations from the same geographical location (De Barro et al. 2003; Tsagkarakou et al. 2007; Gauthier et al. 2008). The primer sequences of around 10 SSR markers are publicly available for studying the A. dispersus genome (Ma et al. 2011).

Table 4.

Average genetic distances among 7 Aleurodicus dispersus populations collected from southern and northeastern states of India.

t04_1115.gif

The present study is the first of its kind in India to utilize SSR markers for characterizing A. dispersus populations. Eighteen SSR primers were amplified in A. dispersus and they produced 356 alleles. The number of alleles produced by different primers ranged from 4 (AD26) to 79 (AY145458) with an average of 19.78 alleles per primer. Our SSR survey clearly detected moderate levels of polymorphism among the A. dispersus populations; multiple alleles were identified in many markers. These SSR allele numbers are higher than those reported from B. tabaci, i.e., up to 13 (Tsagkarakou & Roditakis 2003), 16 (De Barro 2005) and 24 (Gauthier et al. 2008) alleles. This might be due to smaller number of populations collected from geographically closer distances in the present study, whereas the populations from different countries across continents were compared in other studies. The polymorphism information content (PIC) value of each SSR marker is a measure of marker's diversity. PIC provides an estimate of discriminatory power of a locus by taking into account not only the number of alleles expressed, but also the relative frequency of those alleles.

In the present study, SSR markers showed 66.0% polymorphic alleles from 7 populations collected from different geographical regions of India. Similar results were reported by Ma et al. (2011) who observed that microsatellite markers had heterozygosity from Hainan and Canary Island, which ranged from 0.100 to 0.933. Several studies have been carried out to characterize the extent of genetic diversity and differentiation of whitefly populations (Rekha et al. 2005; De Barro 2005; Chu et al. 2007; Tsagkarakou et al. 2007). However, earlier Callejas et al. (2005) had reported that there were no differences in RAPD patterns among A. dispersus populations from different islands of the Canaries.

Cluster analysis showed that, in general, A. dispersus populations are scattered independently in the localities where the samples were collected, especially samples from the Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu populations and theses populations were distinct from each other. Nevertheless, some clusters were evident, joining populations according to the regions. This result suggests that a differentiation of populations has already occurred, mainly according to the geographical regions where populations are localized. The cluster analyses of the A. dispersus populations showed the heterogeneous set of groups and sub-groups, probably due to differences between several nutritional and behavioral factors. The differentiation observed could also be explained by the introduction of A. dispersus populations in different geographical regions of India from several rather than a single founder population, by the massive spread of this populations from other countries like Maldives (Muniappan 1996), Sri Lanka (Ranjith et al. 1996) and Myanmar (Boopathi 2008) in these populations that could have affected the allele frequencies in different geographical regions.

Fig. 2.

Dendrogram showing the UPGMA clustering of Aleurodicus dispersus populations collected from southern and northeastern States of India based on SSR markers.

f02_1115.jpg

Genetic variation was detected in all the populations analyzed. Considering only A. dispersus populations, an average Jaccard similarity of 0.7273 was observed between all populations analyzed. Moreover, UPGMA showed the clustering of individuals by geographical regions. More studies are necessary concerning molecular sequences (mitochondrial and nuclear genomes), host range phenotypes and mating compatibility to elucidate this controversy.

Acknowledgment

We are grateful to Dr. Prasad, Associate Professor, Andhra Pradesh, India; Dr. A.N. Shylesha, Principal Scientist, NBAII, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India; Dr. K. Rajasekar, Scientist (Soil Science), ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Mizoram Centre, Kolasib, Mizoram, India; Dr. Anjitha Alexander, Scientist (Agricultural Entomology), NRC on Citrus, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India; Dr. U. Amala, Scientist (Agricultural Entomology), NRC on Grapes, Pune, Maharashtra, India; Dr. T. Nagaraja, Ph.D. Scholar, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India; Mr. Amitosh, RA, ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region, Mizoram Centre, Kolasib, Mizoram, India Mr. Muthumariaapan and Mr. Mani for providing samples and helping in the collection of A. dispersus populations.

References Cited

1.

T. A. Akinlosotu , L. E. N. Jackai , N. N. Nitonifor , A. T. Hassan , G. W. Agyakwa , J. A. Odfbiyi , A. E. Akingbohungbe , and H. W. Rossel 1993. Spiralling whitefly, Aleurodicus dispersus in Nigeria. FAO Plant Prot. Bull. 41: 127–129. Google Scholar

2.

B. J. Bassam , G. Caetano-Anolles , and P. M. Gresshoff 1991. Fast and sensitive silver staining of DNA in polyacrylamide gels. Ann. Biochem. 196: 80–83. Google Scholar

3.

T. Boopathi 2008. Monitoring and management of pest complex of fruits, vegetables and spices in Mizoram, pp. 289 IN Annual Report of ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region 2008–2009. ICAR Res. Complex for NEH Region, Umiam, Meghalaya, India. Google Scholar

4.

T. Boopathi , and P. Karuppuchamy 2013. Evaluation of Ecofriendly Agents against Spiralling Whitefly, Aleurodicus dispersus Russell on Brinjal. Madras Agric. J. 100(4–6): 559–661. Google Scholar

5.

T. Boopathi , P. Karuppuchamy , M. Kalyanasundaram , S. Mohankumar , and M. Ravi 2013a. Relative efficacy of botanicals, an organic salt and fish oil rosin soap in controlling the spiralling whitefly, Aleurodicus dispersus Russell on cassava. Hexapoda 19(2): 59–66. Google Scholar

6.

T. Boopathi , P. Karuppuchamy , M. Kalyanasundaram , S. Mohankumar , and M. Ravi 2013b. Pathogenicity, ovicidal action, and median lethal concentrations (LC50) of entomopathogenic fungi against exotic spiralling whitefly, Aleurodicus disperses Russell. J. Pathogens. 7 pp. DOI:  http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/393787Google Scholar

7.

CABI/EPPO. 2006. EPPO A1 List of pests recommended for regulation as quarantine pests. EPPO Reporting Service, Paris, France.  http://archives.eppo.org/EPPOReporting/2006Google Scholar

8.

C. Callejas , F. J. Beitia , A. Gobbi , A. Velasco , and M. D. Ochando 2005. The use of RAPD markers to detect genetic patterns in Aleurodicus dispersus (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) populations from the Canary Islands. European J. Entomol. 102: 289–291. Google Scholar

9.

B. A. Chalhoub , S. Thibault , V. Laucou , C. Rameau , H. Holfe , and R. Cousin 1997. Silver staining and recovery of AFLPTM amplification products on large denaturing polyacrylamide gels. Biotechniques 22: 216–220. Google Scholar

10.

S. N. Charati , D. S. Pokharkar , and S. A. Ghorpade 2003. Abundance of spiralling whitefly, a newly introduced pest in Maharashtra State. J. Maharashtra Agric. Univ. 28: 83–84. Google Scholar

11.

D. Chu , T. Jiang , G. X. Liu , D. F. Jiang , Y. L. Tao , Z. X. Fan , H. X. Zhou , and Y. P. Bi 2007. Biotype status and distribution of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in Shandong province of China based on mitochondrial DNA markers. Environ. Entomol. 36: 1290–1305. Google Scholar

12.

B. V. David , and K. Regu 1995. Aleurodicus dispersus Russell (Aleyrodidae: Homoptera), a whitefly pest new to India. Pestology 19(3): 5–7. Google Scholar

13.

P. J. De Barro 2005. Genetic structure of the whitefly Bemisia tabaci in the Asia-Pacific region revealed using microsatellite markers. Mol. Ecol. 14: 3695–3718. Google Scholar

14.

P. J. De Barro , K. D. Scott , G. C. Graham , C. L. Lange , and M. K. Schutze 2003. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci in Bemisia tabaci. Mol. Ecol. Notes 3: 40–43. Google Scholar

15.

N. Gauthier , C. Dalleau-Clouet , and M. E. Bouvret 2008. Twelve new polymorphic microsatellite loci and PCR multiplexing in the whitefly, Bemisia tabaci. Mol. Ecol. Resources 8: 1004–1007. Google Scholar

16.

N. J. Gawel , and R. L. Jarret 1991. A modified CTAB DNA extraction procedure for Musa and Ipomoea. Plant Mol. Biol. 9: 262–266. Google Scholar

17.

M. Harry , S. Robin , and D. Lachaise 1998. L'utilisation de marqueurs génétiques polymorphes (RAPDs) en entomologie évolutive et appliquée. Ann. entomol. Soc. France 34: 9–32. Google Scholar

18.

C. E. Hildebrand , D. C. Torney , and R. P. Wagner 1992. Informativeness of polymorphic DNA markers. Los Alamos Sci. 20: 100–102. Google Scholar

19.

B. John , H. Darryl , and P. Greg 2007. Hort Guard TM Initiative AGWEST Spiraling Whitefly Aleurodicus dispersus Exotic Threat to Western Australia. DOI:  www.agric.wa.gov.au/objtwr/imported_assets/.../pw/.../fs01800.pdfGoogle Scholar

20.

B. R. Kumashiro , P. Y. Lai , G. Y. Funasaki , and K. K. Teramoto 1983. Efficacy of Nephaspis amnicola and Encarsia haitiensis in controlling Aleurodicus dispersus in Hawaii. Proc. Hawaiian Entomol. Socie. 24(2 and 3): 261–269. Google Scholar

21.

G. C. Ma , X. Wu , C. L. Ma , H. L. Wu , H. Y. Hu , L. M. Niu , and Y. G. Fu 2011. Isolation and characterization of polymorphic microsatellite loci in Aleurodicus dispersus (Hemiptera, Aleyrodidae). Gen. Mol. Res. 10(4): 2523–2526. Google Scholar

22.

M. Mani , M. S. Dinesh , and A. Krishnamoorthy 2000. Biological control studies on the spiralling whitefly, Aleurodicus dispersus Russell (Aleyrodidae: Homoptera), In Entomology Congress 2000, Trivandrum, Kerala, India. Google Scholar

23.

R. Muniappan 1996. Spiralling whitefly threat. The Hindu, dated 16.3.1996. p. 12. Google Scholar

24.

M. S. Palaniswami , K. S. Pillai , R. R. Nair , and C. Mohandas 1995. A new cassava pest in India. Cassava Newsl. 19: 6–7. Google Scholar

25.

A. M. Ranjith , D. S. Rao , and J. Thomas 1996. New host records of the “Mealy Whitefly”, Aleurodicus dispersus Russell in Kerala. Insect Environ. 2(2): 35–38. Google Scholar

26.

A. R. Rekha , M. N. Maruthi , V. Muniyappa , and J. Colvin 2005. Occurrence of three genotypic clusters of Bemisia tabaci and the rapid spread of the B biotype in south India. Entomol. Exper. et Appl. 117: 221–233. Google Scholar

27.

F. J. Rohlf 1998. NTSYSpc Numerical Taxonomy and Multivariate Analysis System Version 2.0 User Guide. Applied Biostatistics Inc., Setauket, New York. 37 pp. Google Scholar

28.

L. M. Russell 1965. A new species of Aleurodicus Douglas and two close relatives. The Florida Entomol. 48: 47–55. Google Scholar

29.

P. H. A. Sneath , and R. R. Sokal 1973. Numerical Taxonomy. W. H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco. Google Scholar

30.

M. V. Srinivasa 2000. Host plants of the spiralling whitefly, Aleurodicus dispersus (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Pest Mgt. Horticul. Ecosys. 6: 79–105. Google Scholar

31.

A. Tsagkarakou , and N. Roditakis 2003. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci in Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Mol. Ecol. Notes 3: 196–198. Google Scholar

32.

A. Tsagkarakou , C. S. Tsigenopoulos , K. Gorman , J. Lagnel , and I. D. Bedford 2007. Biotype status and genetic polymorphism of the whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in Greece: mitochondrial DNA and microsatellites. Bull. Entomol. Res. 97: 29–40. Google Scholar
T. Boopathi, S. Mohankumar, P. Karuppuchamy, M. Kalyanasundaram, M. Ravi, B. Preetha, and R. Aravintharaj "Genetic Evidence for Diversity of Spiralling Whitefly, Aleurodicus dispersus (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) Populations in India," Florida Entomologist 97(3), 1115-1122, (1 September 2014). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.097.0318
Published: 1 September 2014
JOURNAL ARTICLE
8 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top