Translator Disclaimer
1 September 2014 Color Polymorphism does not Affect Species Diagnosis of the Melon Aphid, Aphis gossypii (Hemiptera: Aphididae)
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The melon aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover (Hemiptera: Aphididae) has become a serious pest of wide spectrum of crops and is considered to be a potential vector of numerous plant pathogenic viruses worldwide. This pest exhibits color polymorphism in which dark green, pale green and yellow forms exist within a single colony on the same plant and also on different host plants. The co-occurrence of different color forms makes species diagnosis and identification of cryptic species difficult, while they have immense importance in quarantine and biosecurity. Therefore, establishing a tool that facilitates quick and accurate identification of A. gossypii is an urgent need. Molecular diagnosis is the most appropriate and becomes handy because it is independent of sex, polymorphism and life stage, and could be effectively used by person with no or little knowledge in aphid taxonomy. In this study, two mitochondrial markers i.e. cytochrome oxidase subunit gene I (COI) and the tRNA-leucine cytochrome oxidase subunit gene II (tRNA/COII) were tested for species diagnosis. Alignment of partial COI and tRNA/COII sequences from various color forms of A. gossypii collected from 6 different host plants viz., cotton, okra, cucumber, watermelon, aubergine and chili pepper revealed maximum sequence identity (99.7% and 99.4%) suggesting that molecular identification is independent of the color polymorphism in this species. Thus, it is concluded that, color polymorphism does not affect species diagnosis of A. gossypii. The study has unambiguously proved the utility of COI and tRNA/COII for a quick and accurate diagnosis of A. gossypii, which is a critical factor in elucidating virus transmission and implementing biological control.

The melon aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover (Hemiptera: Aphididae) is the most important cosmopolitan, extremely polyphagous invasive aphid species that affects numerous agricultural, horticultural and green house crops worldwide (Blackman & Eastop 1984). It is capable of transmitting more than 75 plant viruses and is considered to be the most versatile of insect vectors of plant viruses (Blackman & Eastop 2000). It exhibits greater diversity in terms of host suitability, life cycle and geographical range than any other aphid (Van Emden et al. 2007). It has an extremely complex clonal structure and great phenotypic plasticity. Aphis spp. are known to exhibit different color forms, as are evident in Aphis frangulae Kaltenbach (Thomas 1968), Aphis fabae Scopoli (Muller 1979), Aphis triglochinis Theobald (Hille Ris Lambers & Dicker 1965), Aphis schneideri (Born) (Rakauskas & Turcinaviciene 1998) and Aphis odinae Van der Goot (Blackman et al. 2011).

Extreme color variation has been observed to be a constant feature in colonies of A. gossypii, the variation being chiefly exhibited by the apterous forms which range from light yellow to blackish green (Wall 1933; Blackman & Eastop 1984; Dixon 1998). The species is best known for its heritable color polymorphism. It has been observed that apterous adult females of A. gossypii may exhibit three distinct colors, i.e. varieties of green to greenish black (dark green, pale green) with irregular darker shadings and lemon yellow (Pergande 1895) (Fig. 1), as a result of abiotic, viz., environmental (light intensity, photoperiod and temperature) (Markkula & Rautapaa 1967), nutritional (host plant) (Honek 1982; Weber 1985; Nevo & Coll 2001) and biotic factors (bacterial symbionts, predator attack and infection by pathogens) (Tsuchida et al. 2010).

The co-occurrence of different color forms of a single species on different hosts, at different time makes it difficult to identify morphologically similar Aphis spp. using conventional taxonomic keys (Patch 1926). Species in the genus, Periphyllus, are difficult to distinguish since they exhibit variable colors and are morphologically similar, e.g., misidentification of P. coracinus color forms (brown, brown-greenish and dark-green) as P. lyropictus (Kessler),which is amber colored with a brown design (Mackos 2007). Similarly, misidentification of the African sorghum head bug, Eurystylus marginatus Odhiambo (Hemiptera: Miridae) as E. oldi was due to variation in color (Sharma & Ratnadass 2000).

The variable form of A. gossypii has made it difficult to place the species in generic keys and the diverse coloring has been a further confusing circumstance (Wall 1933). At this juncture, molecular identification becomes handy as it is not limited by polymorphism, sex and life stage of the target species (Hebert et al. 2003; Asokan et al. 2011, 2013). Molecular techniques provide reliable data in the form of DNA sequences to identify target species and construct phylogenetic relationships (von Dohlen et al. 2006). The present study was conducted to identify A. gossypii in their various colors viz., dark green, pale green and yellow infesting 6 different host plants, namely, cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.; Malvales: Malvaceae), okra (Abelmoschus esculentus Moench; Malvales: Malvaceae), cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.; Cucurbitales: Cucurbitaceae), watermelon (Citrullis lanatus(Thunb.) Matsum & Nakai; Cucurbitales: Cucurbitaceae), aubergine (Solanum melongena L.; Solanales: Solanaceae) and chili pepper (Capisicum frutescens L.; Solanales: Solanaceae) using mitochondrial markers.

Various molecular markers have been employed by researchers for species identification and molecular phylogeny studies in aphids, viz., mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I (mt- COI) (Foottit et al. 2008; Wang et al. 2011), tRNA-leucine + cytochrome oxidase II (tRNA/ COII) (Kim et al. 2010), Cytochrome b (Raboudi et al. 2005), 16S rRNA (vonDohlen & Moran 2000), etc. Since, mitochondrial markers are based on maternally inherited characteristics having subjected to relatively less rapid rates of intra-specific evolutionary change and more reliably reflect inter-specific variation compared to nuclear molecular markers (Savolainen et al. 2005), they have been widely employed in molecular systematics of insects. In the present study, mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit gene I (COI) “barcode” (658bp) and tRNAleucine + cytochrome oxidase II (tRNA/COII) (813bp) regions were used for species diagnosis.

Fig. 1.

General view of Aphis gossypii Glover exhibiting color variations (A; 20x); and dark green, pale green and yellow forms (B, C & D respectively; 400x). A color version of this graphic can be seen online in supplementary material for this article in Florida Entomologist 97(3) (September 2014) at  http://purl.fcla.edu/fcla/entomologist/browse.

f01_1199.jpg

Materials and Methods

Maintenance of Stock Culture and Morphological Identification

The aphid samples used in this work were collected from cotton, okra, cucumber, watermelon, aubergine and chili pepper cultivated at Indian Institute of Horticultural Research (IIHR), Bengaluru, India (N 12° 58′ E 77°35′) during 2011–2012. Color variants of green apterous viviparous females were observed with the yellow ones. Live aphids along with the plant material were transferred to the laboratory, where a single apterous parthenogenetic viviparous adult female was used to establish a stock culture of this material in the laboratory and were maintained on respective hosts under glasshouse insectary conditions. Aphids were identified morphologically by Dr. Sunil Joshi of the National Bureau of Agriculturally Important Insects (NBAII), Bengaluru, India prior to molecular studies. The aphid specimens used for morphological as well as molecular analyses were collected and preserved in 70% ethanol at -20 °C until further use. Three individuals of each color form (dark green, pale green and yellow) of A. gossypii were randomly selected from different hosts as replications and were subjected to molecular analysis to evade sequencing error, if any. A color version of the graphics in this report can be seen online in supplementary material for this article in Florida Entomologist 97(3) (September 2014) at  http://purl.fcla.edu/fcla/entomologist/browse.

Table 1.

Details of Aphis gossypii color forms, its hosts and ncbi-genbank accession numbers.

t01_1199.gif

DNA extraction and Polymerase Chain Reaction

Total genomic DNA was extracted from individual aphid using modified CTAB method (Saghai et al. 1984) and the sample details are given in Table 1. An individual aphid was homogenized in 100 μL of extraction buffer containing CTAB-2%, 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 1.4 M sodium chloride, 20 mM EDTA, 0.1% of 2-mercaptoethanol using a sterile micropestle in 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube. The suspension was incubated at 65°C for 60 min and then an equal volume of chloroform: isoamylalcohol (24:1) was added. The suspension was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min at 8°C. The upper aqueous layer was transferred to a fresh microcentrifuge tube. DNA was precipitated by adding an equal volume of ice-cold isopropanol. The precipitated DNA was spun at 10,000 rpm for 10 min. The resultant DNA pellet was washed with 70% ethanol and dissolved in 30 μL DNase, RNase and Protease free molecular biology water. 5 μL of the extracted DNA was used as template for polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

The mitochondrial COI partial gene fragment was amplified using universal barcode primers (Folmer et al. 1994) (LCO1490F) 5′- GGTCAACAAATCATAAAGATATTGG -3′ and (HCO2198R), 5′-TAAACTTCAGGGTGACCAAAAAATCA-3′. Similarly, the tRNA/COII was amplified using 2993+ (5′-CATTCATATTCAGAATTACC-3′; Stern 1994) and A3772 (5′-GAGACCATTACTTGCTTTCAGTCATCT- 3′; Normark 1996). PCR was carried out in a thermal cycler (Eppendorf, New York, USA) with the following cycling parameters; For COI, 94 °C for 3 min as initial denaturation followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 47° C for 45 s, 72 °C for 45 s and 72 °C for 10 min as final extension. For tRNA/COII, 94 °C for 3 min as initial denaturation followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 46 °C for 60 s, 72 °C for 60 s and 72 °C for 10 min as final extension. PCR was performed in 25 μL total reaction volume containing 10 picomoles of each primer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.25 mM of each dNTP and 0.5U of Taq DNA polymerase (Thermoscientific, USA). The amplified products were resolved in 1.0% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide (10 μg/mL) and visualized in a gel documentation system (Syngene, USA).

Molecular Cloning and Sequencing

The PCR amplified fragments were eluted using Nucleospin® Extract II according to the manufacturer's protocol (Macherey-Nagel, Duren, Germany) and ligated into the general purposecloning vector, InsT/Aclone (Fermentas Life Sciences, Germany). Transformation was carried out according to manufacturer's protocol (Fermentas Life Sciences, Germany) and blue/white selection was done. All the white colonies (with insert) were maintained on LBA containing ampicillin (100 mg/mL), incubated at 37 °C overnight and stored at 4 °C. Plasmids were isolated from the overnight culture of 5 randomly selected positive colonies cultured in LB broth using GeneJET™ Plasmid Miniprep Kit (FermentasLife Sciences, Germany) according to manufacturer's protocol. Sequencing was carried out in an automated sequencer (ABI PrismR 3730 XL DNA Analyzer; Applied Biosystems, USA) using M13 universal primers both in forward and reverse directions.

Sequence Analysis

Homology search was carried out using BLAST ( http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov), compared with published sequences available in the NCBI and matched with the corresponding region of mitochondrial COI and tRNA/COII. The differences in COI and tRNA/COII sequences of A. gossypii color forms were determined using the sequence alignment editor BioEdit (Hall1999) version 7.0.5.3. All the corresponding sequences of A. gossypii color forms were deposited with the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), GenBank with accession numbers KF446143-KF446160 for COI and KF446161- KF446178 for tRNA/COII (Table 1). Sequences generated in the present study along with other widely distributed major aphid vectors of genus Aphis which are morphologically similar differing significantly with only few morphological characters, viz., Aphis glycines Matsumura, Aphis craccivora Koch, Aphis spiraecola Patch, Schizaphis graminum Rondani(as outgroup) (Retrieved from NCBI) were aligned using Clustal W algorithm in BioEdit v7.2.5. Of an 813 bp region determined for tRNA/COII, a 589 bp region could be aligned with sequences obtained from GenBank. Phylogenetic analysis of aligned sequences was done using MEGA. v5. 0. (Tamura et al. 2011). The method of neighbor-joining (NJ) with the Kimura two-parameter model (Kimura 1980) was utilized to build the phylogenetic tree. To assess the robustness of the tree, 1000 bootstrap replicates were selected. The maximum composite likelihood estimate of the pattern of nucleotide substitution for COI and tRNA/COII sequences of Aphis spp. was performed using MEGA v5. 0. (Tamura et al. 2011).

Results and Discussion

Sequencing partial COI and tRNA/COII genes yielded an approximately 700 and 850bp long fragment respectively, for three color forms of A. gossypii infesting 6 crops. Upon sequencing the fragment, 658 and 813bp nucleotides were obtained for COI and tRNA/COII, respectively. A comparison of the replicate sequences for all samples of A. gossypii showed no mismatch, indicating that there were no sequencing errors. BLAST search for the sequences obtained showed highest hits for the respective species. Pair wise alignment of COI and tRNA/COII gene sequences revealed maximum sequence identity (99.7% and 99.4%) with very few variable sites among the color forms which proved that the molecular identification is independent of color polymorphism of the target species.

Further, the phylogenetic tree generated using COI and tRNA/COII sequences of morphologically similar Aphis spp., demonstrated genetic distinction of the species with bootstrap values greater than 85% (Figs. 2 and 3). The sequence divergence among the genus Aphis comprising of 3 morphologically similar species i.e., Aphis glycines, A. craccivora and A. spiraecola based on COI sequences (658 bp) ranged between 3.8–7.6% (mean divergence of 6.13%, SE 0.55%). Similarly, the sequence divergence based on tRNA/ COII sequences (589bp) ranged 3.1–4.6% (mean divergence of 3.87%, SE 0.20%) indicating A. gossypii is more closely related to A. glycines than to A. spireacola and A. craccivora. In addition, the study showed that COI and tRNA/COII sequences are consistent among species and is able to differentiate the species well; thus mitochondrial markers proves to be a useful tool for identification of aphids.

Fig. 2.

Neighbor joining tree of Aphis gossypii color forms along with other morphologically similar Aphis spp. for partial sequences of COI with bootstrap support (1000 replicates). Bootstrap values greater than 85% are shown for branches. Schizaphis graminum was used as an outgroup. A color version of this graphic can be seen online in supplementary material for this article in Florida Entomologist 97(3) (September 2014) at  http://purl.fcla.edu/fcla/entomologist/browse.

f02_1199.jpg

The nucleotide frequencies for COI of Aphis spp. were 34.63% (A), 41.13% (T), 10.25% (C), and 13.98% (G). Similarly, the nucleotide frequencies for tRNA/COII of Aphis spp. were 41.10% (A), 39.44% (T/U), 7.49% (C), and 11.97% (G). The base composition of the COI and tRNA/COII gene fragments was biased toward Adenine (A) and Thymine (T). The overall transition (ti)/ transversion (tv) bias of Aphis spp.was R = 3.4 for COI and R=6.7 fortRNA/COII, where R = [A*G*k1 + T*C*k2]/ [(A+G)*(T+C)]. Codon positions included were 1st + 2nd + 3rd+Noncoding. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated from the datasets (complete deletion option in MEGA). Summary statistics for the different substitutional changes are shown in Table 2 and 3. Each entry showed the probability of substitution from one base (row) to another base (column) instantaneously. Rates of different transitional substitutions were indicated in bold and those of transversionsal substitutions are shown in italics. All these results clearly showed that molecular identification is not limited by color polymorphism of insect pests.

Fig. 3.

Neighbor joining tree of Aphis gossypii color forms along with other morphologically similar Aphis spp. for partial sequences of tRNA/COII with bootstrap support (1000 replicates). Bootstrap values greater than 85% are shown for branches. Schizaphis graminum was used as outgroup. A color version of this graphic can be seen online in supplementary material for this article in Florida Entomologist 97(3) (September 2014) at  http://purl.fcla.edu/fcla/entomologist/browse.

f03_1199.jpg

Table 2.

Maximum composite likelihood estimate of the pattern of nucleotide substitution for coisequences of Aphis spp.

t02_1199.gif

Species diagnosis of prolific aphid pests, especially A. gossypii, is very important worldwide to protect agricultural crops from the view point of quarantine and plant protection as this insect pest inflicts economic damage on numerous crops by direct feeding on plant phloem and by vectoring devastating plant diseases (Blackman & Eastop 2000). Due to its complex life cycles, parthenogenetic reproduction, sex, color morphs and the evolutionary tendency towards the loss of taxonomically useful morphological characters, the identification of A. gossypii is difficult (Foottit et al. 2008). There are implications for the identification of pest aphid species when individuals of the same species can differ depending on environmental conditions (Van Emden et al. 2007). For non-specialists, identification of aphids using morphology is difficult; because many species look very alike, even when they display strongly different ecology and leads to misidentification of species. Further, identification of aphid species is hampered by a considerable intraspecific color variation and continuous morphological variation.

Table 3.

Maximum composite likelihood estimate of the pattern of nucleotide substitution for trna/coii sequences of Aphis spp.

t03_1199.gif

Precision in species identification is the fundamental step for most aspects of biological science. In this regard, molecular identification employing COI and tRNA/COII has an added advantage of not being limited by color polymorphism, sexual forms and life stages of the target species. The present study evaluated the use of mitochondrial markers for quick and reliable identification of A. gossypii color forms amongst other Aphis spp., which are morphologically similar and genetically close. The Aphis spp. were differentiated clearly on the basis of DNA sequence data, which proved to be a valuable tool that could enable accurate identification of these serious insect pests by non specialists and can also be of great interest to detect new invasive species.The study clearly suggests either of COI or tRNA/COII marker can be used as a tool for rapid and reliable identification of A. gossypii from other closely related Aphis spp. irrespective of color polymorphism. Thus, the present investigation helps in quick, accurate, and timely identification of Aphis spp., a critical factor in understanding the fundamentals of species diagnosis, virus transmission, management and devising effective quarantine measures.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Director, Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bengaluru for encouragement and provision of facilities to carry out the research. Authors also thank Dr. Sunil Joshi, National Bureau of Agriculturally Important Insects, Bengaluru for morphological identification of aphids. Thanks are also due to Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), New Delhi for financial support through the Out Reach Programme on Management of Sucking Pests of Horticultural Crops. This paper is a part of doctoral degree work of the senior author.

References Cited

1.

R. Asokan , K. B. Rebijith , K. S. Shakti , and V. V. Ramamurthy 2013. Life stage independent identification of fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) using 28s rDNA sequences. The Bioscan 8(1): 253–256. Google Scholar

2.

R. Asokan , K. B. Rebijith , K. S. Shakti , A. S. Sidhu , S. Siddharthan , K. K. Praveen , R. Ellango , and V. V. Ramamurthy 2011. Molecular identification and phylogeny of Bactrocera species (Diptera: Tephritidae). Florida Entomol. 94(4): 1026–1035. Google Scholar

3.

R. L. Blackman , and V. F. Eastop 1984. Aphids on the World's Crops: An Identification Guide. Wiley, New York. Google Scholar

4.

R. L. Blackman , and V. F. Eastop 2000. Aphids on the World's Crops: An Identification and Information Guide. The Natural History Museum. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., New York. 414 pp. Google Scholar

5.

R. L. Blackman , M. Sorin , M. Andmiyazaki 2011. Sexual morphs and color variants of Aphis (formerly Toxoptera) odinae (Hemiptera, Aphididae) in Japan. Zootaxa 3110: 53–60. Google Scholar

6.

A. F. G. Dixon 1998. Aphid ecology. Chapman & Hall, London, United Kingdom. Google Scholar

7.

O. Folmer , M. Black , W. Hoeh , R. Lutz , and R. Vrijenhoek 1994. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome C oxidase Subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol. Marine Biol. Biotechnol. 3: 294–299. Google Scholar

8.

R. G. Foottit , H. E. L. Maw , C. D. Von Dohlen , and P. D. N. Hebert 2008. Species identification of aphids (Insecta: Hemiptera: Aphididae) through DNA Barcodes. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 8: 1189–1201. Google Scholar

9.

T. A. Hall 1999. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 41: 95–98. Google Scholar

10.

P. D. N. Hebert , A. Cywinska , S. L. Ball , and J. R. De Ward 2003. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc. R. Soc. London B Biol. Sci. 270: 313–321. Google Scholar

11.

D. Hille Ris Lambers , and G. H. L. Dicker 1965. Aphis triglochinis Theobald, 1926, as a pest of red currant and black currant. Entomol. Berichten 25: 5–6. Google Scholar

12.

A. Honek 1982. Color polymorphism in Acyrthosiphon pisum in Bohemia. Acta Entomol. Bohemoslovaca 79: 406–411. Google Scholar

13.

H. Kim , K. A. Hoelmer , W. Lee , Y. Kwon , and S. Lee 2010. Molecular and morphological identification of the soybean aphid and other Aphis species on the primary host Rhamnus davurica in Asia. Ann. Entomol. Soc. America 103(4): 532–543. Google Scholar

14.

M. Kimura 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16: 11–120. Google Scholar

15.

E. Mackos 2007. Aphids/Hemiptera, Aphidoidea on maple Acer platanoides in the urban green areas of the city of Lublin. Aphids and other Hemipterous Insects 14: 73–81. Google Scholar

16.

M. Markkula , and J. Rautapaa 1967. The effect of light and temperature on the color of the English grain aphid, Macrosiphum avenae (F.) (Hom., Aphididae). Ann. Entomol. Fennica 33: 1–13. Google Scholar

17.

F. P. Muller 1979. Eine gelbe Mutante der schwarzen Blattlaus Aphis fabae cirsiia canthoides Scopoli und Bastardierungsversuche. Biol. Zbl. 98: 449–457. Google Scholar

18.

E. Nevo , and M. Coll 2001. Effect of nitrogen fertilization on Aphis gossypii (Homoptera: Aphididae): variation in size, color, and reproduction. J. Econ. Entomol. 94: 27–32. Google Scholar

19.

B. B. Normark 1996. Phylogeny and evolution of parthenogenetic weevils of the Aramigus tessellatus species Complex (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Naupactini): Evidence from mitochondrial DNA sequences.Evol. 50: 734–745. Google Scholar

20.

Patch, 1926. The Melon Aphid. Maine. Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull. 326. Google Scholar

21.

T. Pergande 1895. The Cotton or Melon Plant Louse. Insect Life: 7: 309. Google Scholar

22.

F. Raboudi , P. Chavigny , M. Marrakchi , H. Makni , M. Makni , and M. F. Vanlerberghe 2005. Characterization of polymorphic microsatellite loci in the aphid species Macrosiphum euphorbiae (Hemiptera:Aphididae). Molec. Ecol. Notes 5: 490–492. Google Scholar

23.

R. Rakauskas , and J. Turcinaviciene 1998. New color form of Aphis schneideri (Born.) from Lithuania. Acta Zool. Lituanica Entomol. 8(3): 3–8. Google Scholar

24.

M. M. A. Saghai , K. M. Solima , R. A. Jorgenson , and R. W. Allard , R. W. 1984. Ribosomal DNA spacer-length polymorphisms in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81: 8014–8018. Google Scholar

25.

V. Savolainen , R. S. Cowan , A. P. Vogler , G. K. Roderick , and R. Lane 2005. Towards writing the encyclopedia of life: An introduction to DNA barcoding. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London, B, Biological Sciences 360: 1805–1811. Google Scholar

26.

H. C. Sharma , and A. Ratnadass 2000. Color variation in the African sorghum head bug. Intl. Sorghum and Millets Newsl. 42–43. Google Scholar

27.

D. L. Stern 1994. A phylogenetic analysis of soldier evolution in the aphid family Hormaphididae. Proc. R. Soc. London B Biol. Sci. 256: 203–209. Google Scholar

28.

K. Tamura , D. Peterson , N. Peterson , G. Stecher , M. Nei , and S. Kumar 2011. MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. (In press). Google Scholar

29.

K. H. Thomas 1968. Die Blattlause aus der engeren Verwandtschaft von Aphis gossypii Glover und A. frangulae Kaltenbach unter besonderer Berucksichtigung ihres Vorkommens an Kartoffel. Entomol. Abh. Staatl. Mus. Tierkunde Dresden 35: 337–389. Google Scholar

30.

T. Tsuchida , R. Koga , M. Horikawa , T. Tsunoda , T. Maoka , and S. Matsumoto 2010. Symbiotic bacterium modifies aphid body color. Science 330: 1102–1104. Google Scholar

31.

F. Helmut Van Emden , and Richard Harrington [Eds.]. 2007. Aphids as Crop Pests. CABI, Wallingford, UK. 717 pp. Google Scholar

32.

C. D. Von Dohlen , and N. A. Moran 2000. Molecular data support a rapid radiation of aphids in the Cretaceous and multiple origins of host alternation. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 71: 689–717. Google Scholar

33.

C. D. Von Dohlen , C. A. Rowe , and O. E. Heie 2006. A test of morphological hypotheses for tribal and subtribal relationships of Aphidinae (Insecta: Hemiptera: Aphididae) using DNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 38: 316–329. Google Scholar

34.

R. E. Wall 1933. A study of color and color variation in Aphis gossypii Glover. Ann. Entomol. Soc. America 26: 426–464. Google Scholar

35.

J. Wang , L. Y. Jiang , and G. X. Qiao 2011. Use of a mitochondrial COI sequence to identify species of the subtribe Aphidina (Hemiptera, Aphididae). ZooKeys 122: 1–17. doi:  10.3897/zookeys.122.1256Google Scholar

36.

G. Weber 1985. On the ecological genetics of Sitobion avenae (F.). Z. ang. Entomol. 100: 100–110. Google Scholar
D. Lokeshwari, N. K. Krishna Kumar, and H. Manjunatha "Color Polymorphism does not Affect Species Diagnosis of the Melon Aphid, Aphis gossypii (Hemiptera: Aphididae)," Florida Entomologist 97(3), 1199-1207, (1 September 2014). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.097.0327
Published: 1 September 2014
JOURNAL ARTICLE
9 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top