Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 June 2015 Colobura dirce dirce (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) Larvae Damaging Cecropia hololeuca (Rosales: Urticaceae) in the Zona da Mata, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Wagner de Souza Tavares, Sebastião Lourenço de Assis Júnior, Marcus Alvarenga Soares, José Cola Zanuncio
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The Atlantic Forest biome includes the middle region of the Zona da Mata (MRZM) in southeastern Minas Gerais, Brazil. Cecropia hololeuca Miq. (Rosales: Urticaceae) is an arboreal plant endemic to Brazil. Species of Colobura Billberg (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) are common in forested habitats in the Neotropical Region. The aims of this study were to report damage by C. dirce dirce L. larvae on C. hololeuca in the MRZM, and to review host plants of Colobura spp. Two hundred fifty-two larvae were found damaging twenty 50 cm tall C. hololeuca plants on the campus of the “Universidade Federal de Viçosa” in Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil, and brought to the “Laboratório de Controle Biológico de Insetos (LCBI).” Adults and exuviae of these larvae were deposited at the LCBI and identified in the “Departamento de Zoologia” of the “Universidade Federal do Paraná” in Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil, as C. dirce dirce. This is the first report of this lepidopteran on C. hololeuca in the MRZM. Seventeen species from 6 plant families have been reported as hosts for C. dirce dirce.

“Zona da Mata” is 1 of the 12 mesoregions of the Brazilian state of Minas Gerais, which consists of 142 municipalities grouped into 7 micro regions. One of these microregions is Viçosa, located in the middle region of the “Zona da Mata” (MRZM). The MRZM, located in the southeast of Minas Gerais, has 36,058 km2, and represents 6.2% of the area of this State (Resende et al. 2009). The native vegetation consists of tropical rain forest with dense trees and an expansion of the Atlantic Forest (Portugal et al. 2010). However, most of these native forests have been replaced by agricultural crops (banana, coffee, and sugarcane), pastures (Brachiaria spp.; Poales: Poaceae) and forages, and reforestation (Eucalyptus spp.; Myrtales: Myrtaceae) (Souza et al. 2009; Tavares et al. 2011). The terrain of MRZM is irregular, with hills, narrow valleys, and ancient crystalline rocks forming mountains. However, some cities, such as Viçosa, have flat terrain. The altitude of the MRZM ranges from 100 m in the valleys of the “Rio Pomba” and “Paraíba do Sul” to 1,889 m in the “Pico do Brigadeiro” (Nunes et al. 2009). The climate is montane subtropical with warm summers and cool winters featuring cold breezes and dense fog and with temperatures averaging 19 to 25 °C that are lowest at the higher altitude regions (Santana et al. 2010). Precipitation is greatest in summer and varies from 1,200 to 1,400 mm (Reis et al. 2007).

Cecropia hololeuca Miq. (Rosales: Urticaceae) is an arboreal plant endemic to Brazil, and it reaches 15 m in height in the Atlantic Forest (Godoy & Takaki 2004). Its fruits are the favorite food of the sloth (Vaughan et al. 2007), and it is attractive to many bird and mammal species (Grelle & Garcia 1999). This plant has soft wood, it is undemanding in soil fertility, is commonly found in deforested areas, and is used in restoration and landscaping (Sposito & Santos 2001a). The hollow stems of C. hololeuca are colonized by ants, especially Azteca spp. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), which protect the plant against herbivores in a symbiotic relationship (Sposito & Santos 2001b). Tea brewed from leaves of C. hololeuca has antidiabetic, antispasmodic, anthelmintic, decongestant, diuretic, expectorant, hypotensive, and wound-healing actions (Souccar et al. 2008; Aragon et al. 2010).

Species of Colobura Billberg (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) are common in forested habitats in the Neotropical Region (Muyshondt & Muyshondt 1976), and their range of distribution includes western Mexico, Ecuador west of the Andes, Venezuela to Bolivia east of the Andes, northern Paraguay, Argentina, southeastern Brazil, the Amazon basin in Guyana, and Trinidad (Hayward 1964; Willmott et al. 2001). Adults of Colobura spp. are common throughout the year in forests and secondary habitats from sea level to 1,600 m. Males are common in areas of human habitation and primary forests, and they are attracted to decomposing organic material (Willmott et al. 2001). Before this study, damage to C. hololeuca in the MRZM by larvae of Colobura dirce dirce L. (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) was unknown. Thus, the objectives of this study were to report on damage by larvae of C. dirce dirce on plants of C. hololeuca in the MRZM and to assemble published information concerning the hosts of Colobura spp.

Two hundred fifty-two larvae were found on 5 Apr 2013 damaging by defoliation 20 C. hololeuca plants at 50 cm height on the campus of the “Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)” in Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil (20°45′S, 42°52′W; 651 m asl). These larvae were brought to the “Laboratório de Controle Biológico de Insetos (LCBI)” and placed in cages (26 cm high × 16 cm wide × 16.8 cm long) with C. hololeuca branches exchanged daily until pupation. The stems of these branches were placed in glass tubes with water to reduce wilting of leaves. The adults from these larvae were fed—until they were killed and mounted—with nutrient solution (10.5 g honey, 1.05 L distilled water, 350 mL beer, 60 g sucrose, 1.05 g ascorbic acid, and 1.05 g nipagin) moistened on cotton swabs according to the method proposed for Anticarsia gemmatalis Hübner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) (Ferreira et al. 2008). After development, adult insects were killed in a killing chamber, mounted, and deposited at the LCBI at UFV. Some adults were sent to the “Departamento de Zoologia” of the “Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)” in Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil, for identification. For this study, we also assembled published information concerning host plants of Colobura spp.

Larvae pupated 8 d after collection and adults emerged 15 d after pupation. These insects were identified as C. dirce dirce by Dr. Olaf Hermann Hendrik Mielke. The collection of this species in the MRZM increases the number of regions from which it is known to occur. Seventeen species from 6 plant families have been reported as hosts of C. dirce dirce (Table 1).

Table 1.

Host plants of Colobura spp. (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) reported from the literature.

t01_00.gif

The presence of C. dirce dirce on 20 C. hololeuca plants at 50 cm height confirms the information of Mallet & Longino (1982) and DeVries et al. (1999) that larvae of this insect feed on plants in primary forests or in areas near to urbanization, and of Carneiro et al. (2008) that this subspecies occurs in the central-south region of Brazil. Furthermore, it confirms the polyphagous nature of this species and suggests that because of the lack of a preferred host species, C. dirce dirce might feed on other plants of different botanical families, which are abundant in the MRZM. Plants of agronomic importance, such as Eucalyptus spp. and Coffea spp. (Gentianales: Rubiaceae), are included as hosts of C. dirce dirce (Seitz 1914; Bodkin 1915; Biezanko 1949), suggesting that the devastation of the Atlantic Forest biome could cause this species to become a potential pest of crops.

Larvae were found in small groups, or even as lone individuals, and were clustered together on the adaxial part of the leaf. They preferred young leaves and left the leaf ribs intact. Solitary habits or occurrence of small groups of larvae on young trees or seedlings have also been reported by Willmott et al. (2001), who stated that larvae avoid mature leaves and large trees due to the high concentrations of toxic compounds, such as tannins. Natural enemies were not observed in larvae of C. dirce dirce.

Colobura dirce dirce has potential to damage and to complete its life cycle on C. hololeuca under natural conditions. Despite the large number of hosts of C. dirce dirce, more studies should be conducted to evaluate the effect of defoliation of this plant, which is important for feeding of sloths, birds, and mammals and in folk medicine used by the regional population.

We thank the “Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)”, “the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)” and the “Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG)” for financial support.

References Cited

1.

DMO Aragon , L Guarize , J Lanini , JC Costa , RMG Garcia , E. Scio 2010. Hypoglycemic effects of Cecropia pachystachya in normal and all oxan-induced diabetic rats. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 128(3): 629–633. Google Scholar

2.

M. Barcant 1970. Butterflies of Trinidad and Tobago. Collins, London, United Kingdom. Google Scholar

3.

CW. Beebe 1952. A contribution to the life history of Colobura (Gynaecia auct.) dirce dirce (Linnaeus) (butterfly). Zoologica 27(1): 32–40. Google Scholar

4.

CM. Biezanko 1949. II. Acraeidae, Heliconiidae et Nymphalidae de Pelotas e seus arredores (Contribuição ao conhecimento da fisiografia do Rio Grande do Sul). Livraria Globo, Pelotas, Brazil. Google Scholar

5.

GE. Bodkin 1915. Appendix III. Report of the economic biologist. Reports of the Department of Science and Agriculture (Georgetown) 1913/1914: 11 pp. Google Scholar

6.

V. Bönninghausen 1896. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Lepidopteren-Fauna von Rio de Janeiro. Verhandlungen des Vereins für Naturwissenschaftliche Unter-haltung zu Hamburg 9(1): 19–41. Google Scholar

7.

FM Brown , B. Heineman 1972. Jamaica and its Butterflies. E.W. Classey Ltd., London, United Kingdom. Google Scholar

8.

KS. Brown Junior 1992. Borboletas da Serra do Japi: diversidade, hábitats, recursos alimentares e variação temporal, pp. 142–187 In LPC Morellata [ed.], História Natural da Serra do Japi. Ecologia e Preservação de uma Área Florestal no Sudeste do Brasil. Editoria da Unicamp/FAPESP, Campinas, Brazil. Google Scholar

9.

SC Bruner , LC Scaramuzza , AR. Otero 1975. Catálogo de los Insectos que Atacan a las Plantas Económicas de Cuba. Segunda Edición. Academia de Ciencias de Cuba, Instituto de Zoología, La Habana, Cuba. Google Scholar

10.

E Carneiro , OHH Mielke , MM. Casagrande 2008. Butterflies of southern Santa Catarina Island, Florianopolis, Santa Catarina, Brasil (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea and Papilionoidea). SHILAP- Revista de Lepidopterologia 36(142): 261–271. Google Scholar

11.

LM. Constantino 1998. Butterfly life history studies, diversity, ranching and conservation in the Chocó rain forests of western Colombia (Insecta: Lepidoptera). SHILAP- Revista de Lepidopterologia 26(115): 19–39. Google Scholar

12.

PJ. DeVries 1986. Host plant records and natural history notes on Costa Rican butterflies (Papilionidae, Pieridae and Nymphalidae). Journal of Research on the Lepidoptera 24(4): 290–333. Google Scholar

13.

PJ. DeVries 1987. The butterflies of Costa Rica and their Natural History. Papilionidae, Pieridae, Nymphalidae. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey. Google Scholar

14.

PJ DeVries , R Lande , D. Murray 1999. Associations of co-mimetic ithomiine butterflies on small spatial and temporal scales in a neotropical rainforest. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 67(1): 73–85. Google Scholar

15.

H. Dewitz 1879. Naturgeschichte cubanischer Schmetterlinge. Nach Beobachtungen des Herrn Dr. Gundlach bearbeitet. Zeitschrift für die gesamten Naturwissenschaften 52(2): 155–174. Google Scholar

16.

M Elias , M Joron , K Wilmott , V Kaiser , KL Silva-Brandão , AVL Freitas , CA Mejia , LMG Pineres , AVZ Brower , C. Jiggins 2007. Phylogenetic hypothesis, pattern of speciation and evolution of wing pattern in neotropical Napeogenes butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Journal of Insect Science 7(29): 13-14. Google Scholar

17.

JAM Ferreira , JC Zanuncio , JB Torres , AJ. Molina-Rugama 2008. Predatory behaviour of Podisus nigrispinus (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) on different densities of Anticarsia gemmatalis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae. Biocontrol Science and Technology 18(7): 711–719. Google Scholar

18.

S Godoy , M. Takaki 2004. Effects of light and temperature on seed germination in Cecropia hololeuca Miq. (Cecropiaceae). Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 47(2): 185–191. Google Scholar

19.

CED Grelle , QS. Garcia 1999. Potential dispersal of Cecropia hololeuca by the common opossum (Didelphis aurita) in Atlantic forest, southeastern Brazil. Revue d'Ecologie la Terre et la Vie 54(1): 327–332. Google Scholar

20.

KJ. Hayward 1940. Ninfálidos argentinos. Notas adicionales. Anales de la Sociedad Cientifica Argentina 129(4): 43–47. Google Scholar

21.

KJ. Hayward 1964. Insecta, Lepidoptera (Rhopalocera). Familiae Nymphalidae arumet Heliconiidaearum 3, pp. 14721–14726 In HR Descole [ed.], Genera et Species Animalium Argentinorum. Guillermo Kraft, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Google Scholar

22.

KJ. Hayward 1969. Datos para elestudio de laontogenía de lepidópteros argentinos. Miscelánea. Instituto Miguel Lillo de la Universidad Nacional de Tucuman 31(1): 1–142. Google Scholar

23.

F. Hoffmann 1930. Gynaecia dirce L. (Nymphal.). International Journal of Entomology 24(23): 251–252. Google Scholar

24.

F. Hoffmann 1936. Beiträge zur Lepidopteren Fauna von Sta. Catarina (Süd-Brasilien). Entomologische Rundschau 53: 221–224. Google Scholar

25.

JLB Mallet , JT. Longino 1982. Hostplant records and descriptions of juvenile stages for two rare species of Eueides (Nymphalidae). Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 36(2): 136–144. Google Scholar

26.

LF. Martorell 1976. Annotated food plant catalog of the insects of Puerto Rico. Department of Entomology, Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Puerto Rico, Río Piedras, Puerto Rico. Google Scholar

27.

MM. Merian 1705. Metamorphosis insectorum surinamensium, In Qua erucae ac vermes surinamenses, cum omnibus suis transformationibus, ad vivum delineantur et describuntur, singulis eorum in plantas, flores et fructus collocatis, in quibus reperta sunt; tunc etiam generatio ranarum, bufonum rariorum, lacertarum, serpentum, araneorum et formicarum exhibetur; omnia in America ad vivum naturali magnitudine picta ataque descripta. Gerard Valk, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Google Scholar

28.

W. Müller 1886. Südamerikanische Nymphalidenraupen. Versuch eines natürlichen Systems der Nymphaliden. Zoologische Jahrbücher Systematik 1(1): 417–468. Google Scholar

29.

A Muyshondt Junior , A. Muyshondt 1976. Notes on the life cycle and natural history of butterflies of El Salvador. IC. Colobura dirce L. (Nymphalidae: Coloburinae). Journal of the New York Entomological Society 84(1): 23–33. Google Scholar

30.

LAPL Nunes , LE Dias , I Jucksch , NF Barros , MCM Kasuya , MEF. Correia 2009. Impact of monocultivation coffee on biological indicators of quality soil in the Zona da Mata (MG), Brazil. Ciência Rural 39(9): 2467–2474. Google Scholar

31.

LS Otero , LC. Marigo 1990. Butterflies. Beauty and Behavior of Brazilian Species. Marigo Comunicação Visual, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Google Scholar

32.

AF Portugal , ODV Costa , LM. Costa 2010. Physical and chemical properties of a soil under different production systems and forest in the Zona da Mata region of Minas Gerais State (Brazil). Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 34(2): 575–585. Google Scholar

33.

H Reis , JRS Scolforo , AD Oliveira , AT Oliveira Filho , JM. Mello 2007. Floristic composition analysis, diversity and similarity of Atlantic forest fragments in Minas Gerais State, Brazil. Cerne 13(3): 280–290. Google Scholar

34.

M. Remillet 1988. Catalogue des Insectes Ravageurs des Cultures en Guyane Française. Orstom, Paris, France. Google Scholar

35.

JLP Resende , CTJ Pádua , AD Oliveira , JRS Scolforo , LM. Coelho Junior 2009. Characterization of a forest incentive program in Minas Gerais State. Cerne 15(3): 295–302. Google Scholar

36.

ND. Riley 1975. A field guide to the butterflies of the West Indies. Collins, London, United Kingdom. Google Scholar

37.

SWJ Santana , R Barros , JB Torres , MGC. Gondim 2010. Thermal requirements of the coconut pest Atheloca subrufella (Hulst) (Lepidoptera: Phycitidae). Neotropical Entomology 39(2): 181–186. Google Scholar

38.

A. Seitz 1914. 3. Gattung: Morpheis Hbn. - 34: Gattung: Bolboneura Salv., pp. 433–477 In A Seitz [ed.], Die Gross-Schmetterlinge der Erde 5. Alfred Kernen, Stuttgart, Germany. Google Scholar

39.

J. Sepp 1848–1852. Surinaamsche Vlinders. Naar het levengeteekend. Papillons de Surinam Dessineés d'après Nature, 3 volumes. pp. 101–152 and 225–328, Zoon, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Google Scholar

40.

DS Smith , LD Miller , JY. Miller 1994. The Butterflies of the West Indies and South Florida. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom. Google Scholar

41.

C Souccar , RM Cysneiros , MM Tanae , LMB Torres , MT Lima-Landman , AJ. Lapa 2008. Inhibition of gastric acid secretion by a standardized aqueous extract of Cecropia glaziovii Sneth and underlying mechanism. Phytomedicine 15(6–7): 462–469. Google Scholar

42.

RM Souza , N Anjos , JC. Sorgato 2009. Occurrence of Naupactus cervinus (Boheman) in coffee plantation in the region of Zona da Mata mineira. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 33(1): 1967–1971. Google Scholar

43.

TC Sposito , FAM. Santos 2001a. Architectural patterns of eight Cecropia (Cecropiaceae) species of Brazil. Flora 196(3): 215–226. Google Scholar

44.

TC Sposito , FAM. Santos 2001b. Scaling of stem and crown in eight Cecropia (Cecropiaceae) species of Brazil. American Journal of Botany 88(5): 939–949. Google Scholar

45.

C. Stoll 1786. Aanhangsel van het Werk, de Uitlandische Kapellen, Voorkomende in de Drie Waereld-Deelen Asia, Africa en America, door den Heere Pieter Cramer, Vervattende Naauwkeurige Afbeeldingen van Surinaamsche Rupsen en Poppen; als Mede van Veele Zeldzaame en Nieuwe Ontdekte Uitlandische Dag-en Nagt-Kapellen. 1–42 and 1–8. Nic. Th. Gravius, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Google Scholar

46.

WS Tavares , JE Serrão , RA Barbosa , JC. Zanuncio 2011. Lagerstroemia speciosa (L.) Pers. (Lythraceae), a new host for the defoliator Oiketicus kirbyi Guilding [1827] (Lepidoptera: Psychidae). Tropical Lepidoptera Research 21(2): 100–104. Google Scholar

47.

C Vaughan , O Ramirez , G Herrera , R. Guries 2007. Spatial ecology and conservation of two sloth species in a cacao landscape in Limón, Costa Rica. Biodiversity and Conservation 16(8): 2293–2310. Google Scholar

48.

KR Willmott , LM Constantino , JPH. Hall 2001. A review of Colobura (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) with comments on larval and adult ecology and description of a sibling species. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 94(2): 185–196. Google Scholar

49.

JF Zikán , W. Zikán 1968. Inseto-fauna do Itatiaia e da Mantiqueira. III. Lepid. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira 3(1): 45–109. Google Scholar
Wagner de Souza Tavares, Sebastião Lourenço de Assis Júnior, Marcus Alvarenga Soares, and José Cola Zanuncio "Colobura dirce dirce (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) Larvae Damaging Cecropia hololeuca (Rosales: Urticaceae) in the Zona da Mata, Minas Gerais, Brazil," Florida Entomologist 98(2), 792-795, (1 June 2015). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.098.0262
Published: 1 June 2015
KEYWORDS
nymphalinae
Nymphalini
Papilio dirce
Papilionoidea
Back to Top