Translator Disclaimer
1 April 2007 Review of Aquatic In Situ Approaches for Stressor and Effect Diagnosis
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Field-based (in situ) approaches are used increasingly for measuring biological effects and for stressor diagnoses in aquatic systems because these assessment tools provide realistic exposure environments that are rarely replicated in laboratory toxicity tests. Providing realistic exposure scenarios is important because environmental conditions can alter toxicity through complex exposure dynamics (e.g., multiple stressor interactions). In this critical review, we explore the information provided by aquatic in situ exposure and monitoring methods when compared with more traditional approaches and discuss the associated strengths and limitations of these techniques. In situ approaches can, under some circumstances, provide more valuable information to a decision maker than information from surveys of resident biota, laboratory toxicity tests, or chemical analyses alone. A decision tree is provided to assist decision makers in determining when in situ approaches can add value.

Mark Crane, G Allen Burton, Joseph M. Culp, Marc S. Greenberg, Kelly R. Munkittrick, Rui Ribeiro, Michael H. Salazar, and Sylvie D. St-Jean "Review of Aquatic In Situ Approaches for Stressor and Effect Diagnosis," Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 3(2), 234-245, (1 April 2007). https://doi.org/10.1897/IEAM_2006-027.1
Received: 27 April 2006; Accepted: 1 June 2006; Published: 1 April 2007
JOURNAL ARTICLE
12 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top