Translator Disclaimer
1 February 2008 Differences in Phyllotreta cruciferae and Phyllotreta striolata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) Responses to Neonicotinoid Seed Treatments
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Insecticidal seed treatments are used commonly throughout the Northern Great Plains of North America to systemically protect seedlings of canola (Brassica napus L. and Brassica rapa L.) from attack by the flea beetles Phyllotreta cruciferae (Goeze) and Phyllotreta striolata (F.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Here, we investigated differential responses by the two flea beetle species to the neonicotinoid seed treatments thiamethoxam (Helix and Helix XTra) and clothianidin (Prosper 400) in greenhouse experiments. P. cruciferae experienced higher mortality and fed less when exposed to these compounds than did P. striolata. Beetles of the overwintered and the summer generations responded differently when feeding on seedlings that developed with insecticidal seed treatments, with mortality higher for P. cruciferae in May than in August. When the two flea beetle species were held together at equal densities and allowed to feed on seedlings affected by the seed treatments, mortality of P. cruciferae significantly exceeded that of P. striolata. Differences in efficacies of these compounds for these beetles have ramifications for management strategies in regions where these insects occur sympatrically. Competitive release of P. striolata was previously reported to occur when P. cruciferae was excluded from brassicaceous crops; consequently, the consistent use of these seed treatments over millions of hectares of canola cropland may be a factor that contributes to a shift in prevalence of flea beetle pest species from P. cruciferae toward P. striolata.

J. A. Tansey, L. M. Dosdall, B. A. Keddie, and R. M. Sarfraz "Differences in Phyllotreta cruciferae and Phyllotreta striolata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) Responses to Neonicotinoid Seed Treatments," Journal of Economic Entomology 101(1), 159-167, (1 February 2008). https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493(2008)101[159:DIPCAP]2.0.CO;2
Received: 11 June 2007; Accepted: 15 September 2007; Published: 1 February 2008
JOURNAL ARTICLE
9 PAGES

This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
+ SAVE TO MY LIBRARY

SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission
Back to Top