Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 January 2014 The Reproductive Performance of the Mupli Beetle, Luprops tristis, in Relation to Leaf Age of the Para Rubber Tree, Hevea brasiliensis
T. K. Sabu, P. M. Nirdev, P. Aswathi
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

An analysis of host plant leaf age preferences and phenology studies led to the predictions that tender rubber plant leaves are essential for the completion of the life cycle of the Mupli beetle, Luprops tristis Fabricius (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) and that low tender leaf availability during the post-dormancy stage will limit the beetle population. Analyses of the effects of feeding the beetles leaves of various ages, nitrogen (N) content, and moisture content on fecundity and the duration of post-dormancy survival were carried out. The results showed that tender leaf availability during the post-dormancy phase of L. tristis is a critical factor that determines the survival of L. tristis adults and the subsequent generation. The control of powdery mildew (Odium hevea) disease-mediated premature leaf fall in rubber plantations may regulate the beetle population. A peak in fecundity during the early phase of post-dormancy is proposed as an adaptive mechanism of L. tristis to synchronize egg production and feeding with tender leaf availability in rubber plantations. Variations in nutrient levels and moisture content between deciduous rubber tree leaves of different ages are attributed to the leaf nutrient resorption mechanism of senescing leaves. These results established that tender leaves with high N and moisture levels are essential for post-dormancy survival and that N influences fecundity. The results of the experiments could aid decision making regarding the population management and control of L. tristis in rubber plantations.

Introduction

Massive seasonal invasions of the Mupli beetle, Luprops tristis (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae), cause various problems. These beetles enter residential buildings following summer showers, are nocturnal, are attracted to light, produce allergenic defensive secretions, and go dormant for 8–9 months, making them an extreme nuisance in the rubber plantation belts of southern India (Sabu et al. 2008; Sabu and Vinod 2009a, b). Their very high abundance, concealment in rubber plantation litter layers, aggregation in residential buildings, and lack of natural enemies (Aswathi and Sabu 2011) make controlling them with conventional methods unfeasible. An analysis of their host plant preferences and habits revealed that plantation litter stands of rubber trees, Hevea brasiliensis (Willdenow ex Adrien De Jussieu) Müller Argoviensis 1865 (Malpighiales: Euphorbiaceae), are the breeding and feeding habitats, and prematurely fallen tender rubber leaves are the preferred food source (Sabu and Vinod 2009a, b; Sabu et al. 2012). The breeding phase of the post-dormancy beetles is perfectly synchronized with the annual leaf shedding and sprouting of new rubber plant leaves during the pre-summer period (Sabu and Vinod 2009b), and beetles of certain developmental stages (eggs, larval instars, pupae, and teneral adults) peak at the premature fall of the tender leaves (Vinod and Sabu 2009). These findings indicate that tender leaves are important for the completion of the life cycle of L. tristis and that the control of tender leaf availability will limit the beetle population (Sabu and Vinod 2009 b). An empirical analysis of how the lack of tender leaves will affect the reproductive performance and survival of post-dormancy beetles was undertaken as the primary objective of the present study.

The observation that L. tristis is attracted to and prefers to feed on tender leaves necessitates an analysis of the nutritional quality of leaves of various ages. There is widespread evidence from herbivorous insects that age-related variation in leaf nutrient quality, especially in nitrogen (N) and moisture levels, affects insect performance and that tender leaf availability is a major factor in determining the most suitable periods for larval development and for the optimal reproductive capabilities of adults (Schroeder 1986; Awmack and Leather 2002; Haukioja 2003; Riipi et al. 2004; Ruusila et al. 2005; Van Asch and Visser 2007). However, no data exist on the age-related variations of rubber leaf quality. Hence, age-related variations in N and moisture levels of rubber leaves of various ages were determined, and their influence on the reproductive performance and the survival of L. tristis beetles was assessed. These experiments tested if the prevention of premature leaf fall in rubber plantations, a practice almost abandoned in monoculture rubber plantations due to high labor costs, is likely to enable the control of the beetle populations. It is likely to be welcomed by farmers because it is environmentally friendly and because preventing premature leaf fall would lead to higher latex production. We are unaware whether the levels of the major leaf nutrients, sodium (Na), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), and magnesium (Mg), have any role in the selection of rubber litter by the beetles. Hence, in addition to N and moisture content, Na, P, Ca, and Mg leaf levels (Perry 1994; Lal et al. 2001) were also estimated in leaves of various ages.

Materials and Methods

Collection of beetles and the experimental set-up

L. tristis pupae were collected from the rubber tree plantation (H. brasiliensis clone RRII 105) near the Devagiri college campus located at Calicut (11° 15′ N, 75° 48′ E), in the Kerala state of India in March, 2009. Teneral adults were transferred into two large circular clay vessels (13 x 35 cm) that were capped with a nylon mesh net and placed in an environmental chamber (Yorco,  http://www.yorco.com) at 70% relative humidity and 33° C (representing the average temperature and humidity in the rubber plantation litter). They were fed a mixture of wilted tender, senescent, and dry rubber tree leaves. To simulate the onset of summer showers starting in the last week of April, rubber leaves were no longer provided, and water was sprayed using a mist sprayer to induce dormancy. A wooden box (15 × 7 × 3 cm) was provided as the dormancy shelter for the beetles (see Sabu et al. 2008 for details).

The experiment started in the last week of December, 2009 when the beetles started showing signs of arousal from dormancy. The beetles were sexed following the sternal-notch method (Vinod et al. 2008). Three leaf ages were tested: wilted tender leaves, yellowbrown senescent leaves, and dry leaves. Each replicate comprised one male-female pair in a small clay vessel (8 × 5 cm) covered with nylon mesh and kept in the environmental chamber. A small, moist piece of cotton placed on the net served as a source of water, and the excreta were removed on a daily basis. The eggs produced were counted and transferred into sterile plastic vials (5.5 × 4.5 cm) using a moist fine hair brush. For each pair, the mating duration, the frequency of oviposition, and the fecundity were recorded. Ten replicates for each leaf age were maintained; thus, a total of 30 beetle pairs were analyzed. A parallel stock of 10 pairs was maintained on each leaf age to replace individuals lost by mortality during the intermediate stages of the experiment. Mortality was estimated as the number of days taken to reach 25, 50, and 100% mortality. Replacement beetles were used only for estimations of fecundity.

The 50 eggs laid during the first 24 hours of oviposition were transferred to Petri dishes (9 × 1.5 cm) in the environmental chamber and monitored at six hour intervals. The number of eggs hatched and the duration of egg development were recorded. Neonate larvae that hatched within a six hour period were transferred to labeled plastic vials (5.5 × 4.5 cm) with a moist, fine hair brush. The vials were covered with fine cotton cloth until the emergence of the 3rd instar larvae to prevent the escape of small larval instars and thereafter with nylon mesh. Ten larvae per container were maintained to follow the development of successive larval instars as well as to avoid the inhibitory effect of crowding on larval development in tenebrionids (Tschinkel and Wilson 1971). Larval instars and adults were fed sliced tender rubber leaves. The durations of the larval and pupal stages were recorded.

Leaf collection

Leaves were collected from randomly selected trees from the same rubber plantation of uniform age raised from a single clone. Leaves of particular ages were not available from an individual tree for the entire course of the experiment, and hence leaves from several trees were used. By pooling leaves from several plants from the same plantation of the same clone and age, we hoped to obtain a fair estimate of nutrient concentrations. Tender leaves are distinctly different in color and size from mature leaves, which are small, brown, and smooth, and they were readily available during the early stages of foliage flush. To meet the requirement for tender leaves towards the late phase of the study, twigs of randomly selected trees were broken, and freshly sprouted leaves were collected from them. Senescent yellow-brown leaves were removed by gently flicking the leaves from the trees. Freshly fallen dry leaves that were brown-yellow were handpicked directly from the upper litter layers. Senescent and dry leaves were collected by tracking the trees that shed leaves late. Subsamples of the leaves collected for feeding the beetles were used for the chemical and moisture analyses.

Leaf nutrient quality estimation

Moisture content was determined by measuring the fresh weight (FW) of the leaves (to the nearest 0.001 g), drying them in paper envelopes at ambient temperature for three weeks, and re-weighing them (DW). Moisture content was calculated as (FW - DW)/FW (Nahrung et al. 2009). Following the moisture analysis, the dried leaf samples from each two weeks period were pooled, oven-dried (40 °C for 3 days), ground into powder with a blender, and used for the estimations of nutrient content. Nitrogen content was determined following the Kjeldahl method (Jackson 1973). The estimation of Na, K, Ca, and Mg levels was carried out following the Wet oxidation method (Jackson 1958; Adler and Wilcox 1985) using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer (Varian AA 240 FS, Varian Medical Systems,  http://www.varian.com), and P levels were determined by the Vanado molybdate method (Jackson 1973).

Statistical analysis

Ten replicates of each condition (tender, senescent, and dry leaves) were maintained. A preliminary analysis of the distribution of the data for each parameter was done with the Jarque-Bera test. The moisture content percentages were arcsine square root-transformed prior to statistical analysis. Significance levels of variation in the post-dormancy life spans of the beetles fed leaves of different ages and nutrient parameters (N, Na, K, Ca, Mg, P, and moisture content) were analyzed with oneway ANOVA tests followed by pairwise comparisons with Tukey tests. Variations in fecundity during different phases of postdormancy were analyzed with the Kruskal Wallis test followed by pairwise comparisons with Mann-Whitney tests (Weiss 2007). The influence of N and moisture content on biweekly fecundity of beetles fed tender leaves and on the post dormancy life-span of the beetles fed leaves of various ages was examined with multiple regression analysis. In this analysis, the qualitative variable (leaf age) was kept constant and treated as a categorical (dummy) variable. The relationship between N and moisture content was analyzed with the Pearson correlation test to explain the multicollinear relationship between the variables. The leaf minerals (peripheral variables) were excluded from the multiple regression analysis, as they lead to multicollinearity among the variables (Graham 2003; Gujarati 2011). The significance levels of all analyses were p < 0.05. Minitab 16 Academic software for Windows (Minitab 2010) was used for all statistical analyses.

Results

Beetles fed tender leaves entered into the reproductive phase, produced eggs, and survived for 135.55 ± 45.81 days, while those fed senescent and dry leaves lived for 28.25 ± 12.43 and 21.6 ± 10.36 days, respectively and did not produce eggs. The pre-oviposition period for beetles fed tender leaves was 13.9 ± 2.02 days, fecundity was 60.5 ± 40.23 eggs, egg laying events lasted for six months, and egg laying intervals were 6.9 ± 3.31 days.

Figure 1.

Fecundity* (mean ± SD) of post-dormancy Luprops tristis fed exclusively tender rubber leaves in relation to the phenology of Hevea brasiliensis leaf shedding (*Log transformed). The tan, brown, and light green boxes indicate falling leaves, sprouting, and light green leaves, respectively. High quality figures are available online.

f01_01.jpg

Figure 2.

Kaplan Meier survival curve of Luprops tristis fed tender, senescent, and dry rubber leaves. High quality figures are available online.

f02_01.jpg

Table 1.

Time (days) for post-dormancy Luprops tristis fed tender, senescent, and dry rubber leaves to reach 25, 50, 75, and 100% mortality.

t01_01.gif

Table 2.

Moisture content (%) and amounts of elements (mg/g) in leaves of the rubber tree, Hevea brasiliensis, of different ages. The different superscript letters within each column indicate means that differ significantly by a Student's t-test (p < 0.05).

t02_01.gif

Table 3.

Monthly variation in fecundity of pre-dormancy Luprops tristis in relation to the nitrogen level and moisture content of the tender leaves.

t03_01.gif

Two phases, an initial phase of four months of fecundity and an intervening one month eggless period in the 5th month, were distinct. The highest fecundity was recorded in the 2nd month of the post-dormancy phase (Figure 1 and Table 3). In total, 94% hatching was recorded. The duration of the egg incubation period was 3.43 ± 0.47 days, the larval instar phase lasted 33.74 ± 0.35 days, and the pupal phase lasted 3.08 ± 0.08 days.

Differences in the post-dormancy life span were distinct among the three cultures (F = 108.77, DF = 2, p < 0.05). Beetles reared on dry and senescent leaves had similar life spans (p > 0.05), whereas those fed tender leaves had a significantly longer life span (p < 0.05). The times until the post-dormancy beetles reached 100% mortality were 231 days when fed tender leaves, 56 days when fed senescent leaves, and 42 days when fed dry leaves (Table 1 and Figure 2).

Higher N content was recorded for tender leaves than senescent and dry leaves, and no variation was observed in the levels of N between senescent and dry leaves. Moisture content varied between leaf ages and was highest in tender leaves and lowest in dry leaves. Variation in the levels of the major leaf nutrients were noted, with P and K being highest in tender leaves, Ca being highest in dry leaves, and Na and Mg being highest in senescent and dry leaves (Table 2). Multiple regression analysis revealed a significant influence of the N level and moisture content on the lifespan of the post-dormancy beetles (p ≤ 0.05; F = 55.39; R2 = 0.89). Multiple regression analysis of the N and moisture leaf content on the fecundity of the beetles revealed a significant influence of N (p ≤ 0.05; T = 2.75; F = 41.73; R2 = 0.90) and no influence of moisture (p ≥ 0.05; T = 0.79; F = 41.73; R2 = 0.90) on fecundity. Pearson correlation analysis revealed a high correlation between N and moisture content (r = -0.99; p ≤ 0.05).

Discussion

Reproduction and survival of postdormancy L. tristis fed leaves of various ages

Post-dormancy L. tristis beetles fed senescent and dry rubber leaves exhibited significantly greater mortality and a failure to reproduce compared with those fed tender leaves, demonstrating that tender rubber leaves are essential for L. tristis to complete its life cycle. Earlier work on the link between the phenology of the rubber tree and the L. tristis life cycle revealed that the high abundance of L. tristis in rubber plantations is related to the advantages gained from feeding prematurely fallen tender leaves. Premature leaf fall is caused primarily by powdery mildew (Odium hevea) and Corynespora cassiicola. Hence, it was suggested that the control of the premature leaf fall in rubber plantations may enable control of the pest (Sabu and Vinod 2009b; Vinod and Sabu 2009; Sabu et al. 2012). The present study provides empirical evidence supporting these earlier predictions. Additionally, the inability of post-dormancy L. tristis to survive on senescent and dry leaves beyond 3–4 weeks suggests that reproduction depends on the availability of leaves from the premature leaf fall mediated by powdery mildew disease and not on those from the leaf fall associated with Corynespora that occurs 3–4 months later. Hence, the control of the seasonal premature leaf fall in rubber plantations caused by powdery mildew soon after leaf sprouting by spraying fungicides may enable control of this pest. These findings have great practical significance, as they reveal a strategy to tackle this pest that is otherwise not practically feasible either with beetle-directed pesticides or with natural enemies (Aswathi and Sabu 2011). Furthermore, it confirms that tender leaf availability is a major limiting factor regulating the life cycle of L. tristis in the moist south Western Ghats in addition to rainfall (Vinod and Sabu 2010). Since tender leaf resource availability is limited to the presummer period in monoculture rubber plantation belts, L. tristis would remain univoltine in the region.

The survival of post-dormancy L. tristis on dry leaves and its implications

Although post-dormancy L. tristis could not enter the reproductive phase, its ability to survive on dry leaves for 3–4 weeks indicates its remarkable potential to survive until leaf sprouting and subsequent tender leaf fall. This could be a strategy to counteract the high mortality experienced during the last phase of dormancy (Sabu et al. 2008), which if continued could lead to death of the entire postdormancy beetle population and prevent the production of the next generation. One quarter of the beetles perish during the 9 month dormancy period (see Sabu et al. 2008 for details). The present record of 75% mortality of post-dormancy L. tristis fed dry leaves within 3–4 weeks indicates that only onequarter of post-dormancy L. tristis returning to rubber plantations could survive and enter the reproductive phase upon the return of tender leaves. The high survival rate of postdormancy L. tristis fed tender leaves suggests that the availability of tender leaves of other rubber clones in the RI 115 plantation (other host plants are unlikely in monoculture rubber plantations) would lead to higher survival rates for the post-dormancy L. tristis and a rise in population. These findings provide an answer to the questions raised in earlier studies (Sabu et al. 2007; Sabu and Vinod 2009a) on whether the post-dormancy L. tristis that return to the plantations could survive on dry leaves during the initial phase of leaf fall in rubber plantations. They indicate perfect synchronization of the life cycle of the beetle with host plant phenology at two occasions—first at the time of post-dormancy return and the annual leaf shedding by rubber trees and later at the time of entry into the breeding phase and the premature leaf fall in rubber plantations (Sabu and Vinod 2009a).

Leaf age-related variations in mortality indicate that if annual leaf shedding and tender leaf availability are delayed, one could expect high mortality of post-dormancy L. tristis. Conversely, if the annual leaf shedding starts prematurely due to the early cessation of the monsoons and the onset of summer conditions, there would be low mortality and larger populations. Such variations in the annual leaf shedding and tender leaf availability could have caused the variation in the abundance of the L. tristis population and the intensity of infestation during certain years. Monitoring the variations in leaf shedding would enable the predictions of the severity of infestation necessary to initiate precautionary measures to limit the intensity of home invasions.

The high fecundity and prolonged postdormancy phase of L. tristis fed tender leaves

The fecundity of beetles fed exclusively tender leaves in laboratory conditions was higher than the fecundity in natural conditions (Sabu et al. 2008). Hence, upon premature leaf fall, the duration of the post-dormancy phase and fecundity will increase (60.5 ± 40.24 eggs in this study under ideal conditions, in contrast to 30.6 ± 13.92 eggs under natural conditions; Sabu et al. 2008) leading to larger populations and severe beetle aggregation. However, these conditions lead to the emergence of teneral adults with less time for food reserve accumulation and low survival chances during dormancy (Sabu et al. 2008). Currently, the RR 115 rubber clone with early leaf fall and leaf sprouting during January is being replaced by the RR 414, RR 424, and RR 430 rubber clones, which display delayed leaf shedding and leaf sprouting during February. The combined effect of the late leaf sprouting of the new clones and the early leaf shedding of the old RR 115 clones will lead to a prolonged period of tender leaf availability until the complete replacement occurs over a 10–15 year period. Hence, a further rise in the L. tristis population in this region is predicted.

A decline in fecundity towards the late phase of post-dormancy even when tender leaves are available indicates that fecundity variation during the post-dormancy L. tristis phase cannot be attributed to the leaf quality variation. Instead, this result could reflect an adaptive mechanism of L. tristis to synchronize egg production and the feeding phase with tender leaf resource availability to produce a new generation of beetles (class 1 type described earlier; see Sabu et al. 2008 for details) with more food reserves and better survival chances during the forthcoming dormancy phase. The eggless period towards the last phase of post-dormancy corresponds to the period of home invasion and the onset of rainfall. What leads to cessation of egg laying during this period is not understood, and it could be linked to the inherent genetic disposition towards dormancy (Denlinger 1986; Leather et al. 1995).

Leaf age-related variations in rubber leaf quality

Variations in the levels of major nutrients and moisture content occur in deciduous rubber tree leaves of various ages, and the highest levels occur in tender leaves, likely due to the leaf nutrient resorption mechanism of senescing leaves (Killingbeck 1996; Eckstein et al. 1998; Aerts and Chapin 2000; Van Heerwaarden et al. 2003). The nutrient resorption mechanism is considered one of the most important plant nutrient conservation mechanisms (Wright and Westoby 2003; Yan et al. 2006; Huang et al. 2007). Foliar nutrient concentrations remain relatively constant from the time of full leaf expansion to the beginning of senescence and then decrease rapidly as foliar nutrients are resorbed prior to abscission (Hevia et al. 1999). N, P, and K are mobile nutrients that are easily withdrawn from senescing tissues, and K is known for leaching (Perry 1994; Lal et al. 2001; Hagen-Thorn et al. 2006). Hence, the fall in the levels of N and P in older leaves is attributed to intensive nutritive resorption, and the fall in K levels is likely due to leaching loss during the prolonged monsoon period in addition to resorption. Earlier studies suggest that Mg is moderately resorbed (up to 20%), whereas Ca is not resorbed prior to leaf abscission (Hagen-Thorn et al. 2006). Ca is an immobile nutrient, leading to its higher concentration (Epstein 1972; Perry 1994; Lal et al. 2001) in senescent leaves. These data indicate that rubber is a “nutrient conservative” species with high nutritive resorption during leaf senescence, and the senescent and dry leaves are therefore of lower nutrient quality compared to tender leaves.

The effects of leaf age-related variations in chemical quality on the post-dormancy survival and fecundity of L. tristis

The present study reveals that tender leaves are essential for L. tristis to enter into the reproductive phase and complete its life cycle and that the levels of N and water, the two most important nutritional components for growth, are high in tender leaves; furthermore, herbivore performance (survival, growth, and reproductive capacity) was also high in tender leaves (Mattson 1980; Raupp and Denno 1983; Osier and Lindroth 2001; Awmack and Leather 2002; Holton et al. 2003). The high correlation between N and moisture content indicates that due to the multicollinearity between the variables in the regression analysis, the N values are masking the effect of moisture content on fecundity; otherwise, the moisture content would have been a significant contributor. No broad generalizations about the impacts of other minerals on the longevity and fecundity of L. tristis can be made from these data, as other nutrients and defensive components of the diet modify their effects (Martel 1998; Clancy 1992).

Conclusions

The results of the experiments, though conducted in controlled conditions, could be used to forecast the performance of L. tristis in field conditions and could be included in decisions on population management and control. The present study shows that the availability of tender leaves with high levels of N and moisture is a critical factor that determines the fate of adult post-dormancy L. tristis beetles and the survival of the next generation. Since post-dormancy L. tristis obtains tender leaves from the powdery mildew-mediated premature leaf fall, the control of the premature leaf fall will reduce the population of the next generation of beetles. Additionally, these results imply that because tender leaves are essential for the reproductive maturity of L. tristis and are available only for a limited period of time, because wet conditions drive the beetles indoors, it is highly likely that upon removing tender leaves, L. tristis will remain univoltine in the rubber plantation belts.

Acknowledgements

Financial assistance was provided by the Kerala State Council for Science, Technology and Environment (KSCSTE). The Government of Kerala is also gratefully acknowledged. The authors are grateful to Devagiri College management in Calicut for permission to collect the rubber leaves from the rubber plantation, K.T. Thomachen (St. Joseph's College, Devagiri, Calicut) for statistical support, and H.F. Nahrung (University of the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, Australia) for critical comments.

References

1.

PR Adler , GE. Wilcox 1985. Rapid perchloric acid methods for analysis of major elements in plant tissue. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 16: 1153–1163. Google Scholar

2.

R Aerts , FS. Chapin 2000. The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: A reevaluation of processes and patterns. Advances in Ecological Research 30: 1–67. Google Scholar

3.

P Aswathi , TK. Sabu 2011. Weaver ant (Oecophylla smaragdina), huntsman spider (Heteropoda venatoria) and house gecko (Hemidactylus frenatus) as potential biocontrol agents of the nuisance pest, Luprops tristis. Halteres 3(3): 56–61. Google Scholar

4.

Awmack Caroline S , Leather. Simon R 2002. Host plant quality and fecundity in herbivorous insects. Annual Review of Entomology 47: 817–844. Google Scholar

5.

KM. Clancy 1992. Response of western spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) to increased nitrogen in artificial diets. Environmental Entomology 21: 331–44. Google Scholar

6.

DL. Delinger 1986. Dormancy in tropical insects. Annual Review of Entomology 31: 239–244. Google Scholar

7.

RL Eckstein , PS Karlsson , M. Weih 1998. The significance of resorption of leaf resources for shoot growth in evergreen and deciduous woody plants from a subarctic environment. Oikos 3: 567–575. Google Scholar

8.

E. Epstein 1972. Mineral nutrition of plants: principles and perspectives. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. Google Scholar

9.

MH. Graham 2003. Confronting multicollinearity in ecological multiple regression. Ecology 84: 2809–2815. Google Scholar

10.

DN. Gujarati 2011. Econometrics by Example. Mc Graw-Hill. Google Scholar

11.

A Hagen-Thorn , I Varnagiryte , B Nihlgàrd , K. Armolaitis 2006. Autumn nutrient resorption and losses in four deciduous forest tree species. Forest Ecology and Management 228: 33–39. Google Scholar

12.

E. Haukioja 2003. Putting the insect into the birch-insect interaction. Oecologia 136: 161–168. Google Scholar

13.

F Hevia , ML Minoletti , KLM Decker , REJ. Boerner 1999. Foliar nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics of three Chilean Nothofagus (Fagaceae) species in relation to leaf lifespan. American Journal of Botany 86: 447–455. Google Scholar

14.

MK Holton , RL Lindroth , EV. Nordheim 2003. Foliar quality influences tree-herbivoreparasitoid interactions: effects of elevated CO2, O3, and plant genotype. Oecologia 137: 233–244. Google Scholar

15.

J Huang , X Wang , E. Yan 2007. Leaf nutrient concentration, nutrient resorption and litter decomposition in an evergreen broad-leaved forest in eastern China. Forest Ecology and Management 239: 150–158. Google Scholar

16.

ML. Jackson 1958. Plant tissue analysis- mineral constituents in soil chemical analysis, part 2. Prentice-Hall, Inc. Google Scholar

17.

ML. Jackson 1973. Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall. Google Scholar

18.

KT. Killingbeck 1996. Nutrients in senesced leaves: keys to the search for potential resorption and resorption proficiency. Ecology 7: 1716–1727. Google Scholar

19.

CB Lal , C Annapurna , AS Raghubanshi , JS. Singh 2001. Foliar demand and resource economy of nutrients in dry tropical forest species. Journal of Vegetation Science 12(1): 5–14. Google Scholar

20.

SR Leather , KFA Walters , JS. Bale 1995. The ecology of insect overwintering. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

21.

J. Martel 1998. Plant-mediated effects of soil salinity on a gall-inducing caterpillar Epiblema scudderiana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) and the influence of feeding guild. European Journal of Entomology 95: 545–57. Google Scholar

22.

WJ Mattson Jr. 1980. Herbivory in relation to plant nitrogen content. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11: 119–161. Google Scholar

23.

Minitab. 2010. MINITAB Statistical Software, Minitab Inc. Release 16 for Windows. Google Scholar

24.

HF Nahrung , RW Waugh , RA. Hayes 2009. Corymbia species and hybrids: Chemical and physical foliar attributes and implications for herbivory. Journal of Chemical Ecology 35: 1043–1053. Google Scholar

25.

TL Osier , RL. Lindroth 2001. Effects of genotype, nutrient availability and defoliation on aspen phytochemistry and insect performance. Journal of Chemical Ecology 27: 1289–1313. Google Scholar

26.

DA. Perry 1994. Forest Ecosystems. pp. 1–649. Johns Hopkins University Press. Google Scholar

27.

MJ Raupp , RF. Denno 1983. Leaf age as a predictor of herbivore distribution and abundance. In: RF Denno and MJ Raupp , Editors. Variable plants and herbivores in natural and managed system. pp. 91–124. Academic Press. Google Scholar

28.

ME Riipi , KL Haukioja , V Ossipov , S Ossipova , K. Pilaja 2004. Ranking of individual mountain birch trees in terms of leaf chemistry: seasonal and annual variation. Chemoecology 14: 31–43. Google Scholar

29.

V Ruusila , J Morin , T. Van Ooik 2005. Shortlived herbivore on a long-living host: tree resistance to herbivory depends on leaf age. Oikos 108: 99–104. Google Scholar

30.

TK Sabu , M Greeshma , P. Aswathi 2012. Host plant and leaf-age preference of Luprops tristis (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae: Lagriinae: Lupropini): A home invading nuisance pest in rubber plantation belts. Psyche Article ID 232735. Google Scholar

31.

TK Sabu , O Merkl , P. Abhitha 2007. A new Luprops species from Western Ghats with redescriptions of and identification key to the species of Peninsular India and Sri Lanka (Tenebrionidae: Lagriinae: Lupropini). Zootaxa 1636: 47–58. Google Scholar

32.

TK Sabu , KV Vinod , MC. Jobi 2008. Life history, aggregation and dormancy of the rubber plantation litter beetle, Luprops tristis, from the rubber plantations of moist south Western Ghats. Journal of Insect Science 8: 1. Available online:  http://www.insectscience.org/8.01/  Google Scholar

33.

TK Sabu , KV. Vinod 2009a. Population dynamics of the rubber plantation litter beetle Luprops tristis, in relation to annual cycle of foliage phenology of its host, the para rubber tree, Hevea brasiliensis. Journal of Insect Science 9: 56. Available online:  http://www.insectscience.org/9.56/  Google Scholar

34.

TK Sabu , KV. Vinod 2009b. Food preferences of the rubber plantation litter beetle, Luprops tristis, a nuisance pest in rubber tree plantations. Journal of Insect Science 9: 72. Available online:  http://www.insectscience.org/9.72/  Google Scholar

35.

L. Schroeder 1986. Changes in tree leaf quality and growth performance of lepidopteran larvae. Ecology 67: 1628–1636. Google Scholar

36.

WR Tschinkel , CD. Wilson 1971. Inhibition of pupation due to crowding in some tenebrionid beetles. Journal of Experimental Zoology 176: 137–146. Google Scholar

37.

M Van Asch , ME. Visser 2007. Phenology of forest caterpillars and their host trees: the importance of synchrony. Annual Review of Entomology 52: 37–55. Google Scholar

38.

LM Van Heerwaarden , S Toet , R. Aerts 2003. Current measures of nutrient resorption efficiency lead to a substancial underestimation of real resorption efficiency: facts and solutions. Oikos 101: 664–669. Google Scholar

39.

KV Vinod , KT. Sabu 2010. Dormancyinducing factors of rubber litter beetle, Luprops tristis (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Insect Science 17: 47–51. Google Scholar

40.

KV Vinod , TK Sabu , TM. Benny 2008. Sex determination of the live rubber plantation litter beetle, Luprops tristis: a novel method. Journal of Insect Science 8:12. Available online:  http://www.insectscience.org/8.12/  Google Scholar

41.

NA. Weiss 2007. Introductory statistics, 7th edition. Dorling Kindersley. Google Scholar

42.

IJ Wright , M. Westoby 2003. Nutrient concentration, resorption and lifespan: leaf traits of Australian sclerophyll species. Functional Ecology 17: 10–19. Google Scholar

43.

ER Yan , XH Wang , JJ. Huang 2006. Shifts in plant nutrient use strategies under secondary forest succession. Plant and Soil 289: 187–197. Google Scholar
This is an open access paper. We use the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license that permits unrestricted use, provided that the paper is properly attributed.
T. K. Sabu, P. M. Nirdev, and P. Aswathi "The Reproductive Performance of the Mupli Beetle, Luprops tristis, in Relation to Leaf Age of the Para Rubber Tree, Hevea brasiliensis," Journal of Insect Science 14(12), 1-11, (1 January 2014). https://doi.org/10.1673/031.014.12
Received: 17 April 2012; Accepted: 26 June 2013; Published: 1 January 2014
KEYWORDS
fecundity
leaf age performance
leaf nutrient resorption
leaf substrate quality
survival
Back to Top